Search This Blog

Loading...

Friday, January 7, 2011

Jen Marlowe: One Family in Gaza (video)

Friday, January 7, 2011 at 9:44AM Gilad Atzmon
Just months after the Israeli assault that killed 1,390 Palestinians, I visited Gaza. Among dozens of painful stories I heard, one family stood out. I spent several days with Kamal and Wafaa Awajah, playing with their children, sleeping in the tent they were living in, and filming their story.

Wafaa described the execution of their son, Ibrahim. As she spoke, her children played on the rubble of their destroyed home. Kamal talked about struggling to help his kids heal from trauma.

What compelled me to tell the Awajah family's story? I was moved not only by their tragedy but by the love for their children in Wafaa and Kamal's every word.

Palestinians in Gaza are depicted either as violent terrorists or as helpless victims. The Awajah family challenges both portrayals. Through one family’s story, the larger tragedy of Gaza is exposed, and the courage and resilience of its people shines through.

For more information or to purchase a DVD or organize a screening, please contact donkeysaddle@gmail.com


One Family in Gaza from Jen Marlowe on Vimeo.
 
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

13 IOF bullets penetrated the head and heart of an elderly Palestinian man

[ 07/01/2011 - 02:48 PM ]

Qawasmi's wife showing journalists where her husband was murdered in cold blood

AL-KHALIL, (PIC)-- Haj Omar al-Qawsmi, 65 years, was asleep in his bed at 4:15 Friday morning when IOF troops quietly sneaked into his flat and went straight to his bedroom and riddled his head and upper body with 13 bullets leaving his brain splattered on the floor mistaking him for Wael al-Bitar.

His wife was praying when she heard the shooting and she cried aloud, the occupation soldiers immediately closed here mouth and dragged her to another room, when they ascertained her identity and that of her husband they went to Wael al-Bitar’s flat searched the flat and arrested him. The IOF soldiers also questioned Wael’s wife before leaving according to the family.

Meanwhile the family of Mohannad Neiroukh, another captive in Abbas’s jails who was released after 40 days of hunger strike, said that the IOF troops encircled their home and raided it amid firing of flares and stun grenades and took Neiroukh, who is unconscious, to an awaiting ambulance.

The family of Majd Obaid said that IOF troops encircled their home, broke windows and doors and took Majd, who is not able to walk after going through a 40-day strike in Abbas’s jails, to an awaiting ambulance.

The same was relayed by the families of Ahmad Oweiwi and Wisam al-Qawasmi about the kidnapping of their sons who were only released on Thursday evening from Abbas’s jails by IOF troops.

Israeli occupation kidnaps five Palestinians hours after being released from PA


River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Dagan: Hezbollah’s Firepower 90% Stronger than World Countries

07/01/2011 Meir Dagan, who retired from his post as Mossad chief on Thursday after eight years, does not believe Iran will have nuclear capability before 2015.

In a summary given to the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, Dagan claimed that Iran was a long way from being able to produce nuclear weapons, following a series of “failures” that had set its program back by several years. Therefore, he said, Iran will not get hold of the bomb before 2015 approximately.

Dagan handed over the job to his successor, Tamir Pardo, in the Prime Minister’s Bureau Thursday morning, after having parted from the ministers during last Sunday’s cabinet session.

The former Mossad chief had said on various occasions in the past that Israel should go to war only if attacked, or if in immediate danger of survival.

According to a Wikileaks report, Dagan told a senior American official that it would take a series of coordinated moves to stop the Iranian nuclear program. He reportedly suggested increasing the economic sanctions against Iran, preventing the export of products required for the nuclear project to Iran, covert warfare, and encouraging minority and opposition groups to “topple” the Iranian regime.

Analysts told Israeli daily the Jerusalem Post Iran would use Hezbollah to launch massive rocket attacks against Israel if Tel Aviv targets Tehran's nuclear facilities.

"The Iranians – who are largely responsible for building up Hezbollah to such an extent that today it has more firepower than 90 percent of the countries of the world – would 'call in their chips,' and the organization would launch massive rocket attacks against Israel's home front," the analysts said about a possible Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear facilities. "It is probable some of the Hezbollah attacks would come from Syria, which means that Damascus would be drawn into the conflict," according to the daily.

The analysts told the Post that the new Mossad chief is climbing to the top of the intelligence community pyramid with working assumptions already in place on a number of issues, notably the possible strike on the nuclear facilities and its aftermath.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Those who sow hate can only blame themselves when they reap it multi-fold‏

By Nahida

Jewish zionists continue their malevolent acts of sowing hate, causing mayhem, setting ablaze regions and destabilizing societies of multi-faiths, multi-cultures who have peacefully coexisted for millennia, watch how they do it on their prime TV shows:


This was aired by "israeli" TV just days before the bombings of a Copt (Christian) Church in Alexandria (Egypt), on New Year's eve.


The sudden multiplication by such bloody attacks on Christians in Muslim countries (Iraq, Egypt, Sudan...ect) has all the marks of Mossad's false flag operations. Only haplessly ignorant people would believe that Muslims have suddenly, out of the blue, developed hatred of Christians, and are bent on killing them and destroying their churches which they have protected for centuries.

Even the pro-west Egyptian diplomats are overt on their assumption that this is Mossad's deed. In fact the date itself has their signature. Christmas and new year!

==============================

Flash back:

FALSE FLAG OPERATIONS

The zionist not only that they have their hands dripping of the blood of Palestinians since they decided to rob Palestine, they murdered their own “friends” and “allies”; as when they bombed the USS Liberty in order to blame it on Egypt

They even did it against their own people, as they did to Iraqi Jews to force them to flee their homes

And they have been doing again with commendable achievement in Iraq to flare up a civil and sectarian war:

DIVIDE AND CONQUER is their best game



Iran mosque blast plotters admit Israeli, US links: report

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=8657

==============================

Operation Susannah



In 1956, as reported by the Times Of London, during one of Israel's perpetual wars with its neighbors, the Israeli Mossad tried to trick the United States into siding with Israel against Egypt by blowing up a US facility in Cairo and blaming the Egyptians for it. The plot was wrecked when the operatives were caught and confessed, creating a huge scandal. This event was referred to as the Lavon Affair named after the Israeli Defense Minister, Pinhas Lavon, at that time.
 
THE LAVON AFFAIR: IS HISTORY REPEATING ITSELF?

{……….In 1954, Israel sponsored bombings against US and UK interests in Cairo aiming to cause trouble between Egypt and the West.[4] This operation, latter dubbed the Lavon Affair cost Israeli defense minister Pinhas Lavon his job. Israel (where it is known as “The Unfortunate Affair”) finally admitted responsibility in 2005.[5]………}

Operation Susannah


http://www.conservapedia.com/Mossad#Operation_Susannah

Operation Susannah was a false flag operation conducted in 1954 by Israeli operatives in Egypt against American and British targets, designed to appear as though Egyptian Arabs had carried out the attacks. Israeli agents had infiltrated Egyptian society and recruited Egyptian-born Jews to carry out the operation. The U.S. Information Agency libraries in Alexandria and Cairo as well as a British-owned theater were bombed on July 14, 1954. No injuries or casualties occurred during the bombings, except to one of the operatives, when his bomb exploded prematurely. Egyptian authorities uncovered the operation, initially not realizing it was an Israeli operation. After the Israeli spy ring was broken up, trials followed. Two suspects were acquitted, while two culprits were hanged, and several others were sentenced to lengthy prison terms. One or two other operatives committed suicide.

Israeli defense minister Pinhas Lavon was forced to resign in 1955. Consequently, the aftermath of Operation Susannah is often called The Levon Affair.

THE JEWS OF IRAQ
by the Iraqi Jew Naeim Giladi

The Iraqi Jew Naeim Giladi wrote a book detailing how Israelis performed terrorist actions and caused the deaths of many Jewish Iraqis during the 1950s so that Arab Iraqis can be blamed for it. The purpose of these terrorist actions was to cause Jews to migrate to Israel from Iraq. All but 6,000 of the 125,000 Jews in Iraq fled to Israel.

THE JEWS OF IRAQ - inminds.com

The Jews of Iraq - bintjbeil. com


"I write this article for the same reason I wrote my book:
to tell the American people, and especially American Jews, that Jews from Islamic lands did not emigrate willingly to Israel; that, to force them to leave, Jews killed Jews; and that to buy time to confiscate ever more Arab lands, Jews on numerous occasions rejected genuine peace initiatives from their Arab neighbors.

I write about what the first prime minister of Israel called "cruel Zionism."

I write about it because I was part of it.


==============================

King David’s hotel

Menachem Begin was the terrorist head of the Irgun when it bombed
the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, killing nearly 100 people.

 Begin had been a criminal in the Soviet Union (1940) before bringing his terror methods to Palestine.

On the morning of July 22, 1946, a group of 15-20 Irgun terrorists dressed as Arabs entered the King David Hotel in Jerusalem. They unloaded 225 kilograms of explosives hidden in milk churns.(1) The King David Hotel housed the Secretariat of the Government of Palestine and Headquarters of the British Forces in Palestine. When a British officer became suspicious, a shootout took place and the Irgun lit the fuses and fled. The explosion destroyed part of the hotel and killed 91 people. Most of the victims were British but 15 innocent Jews also died. It must not be felt that Begin was merely suspected of being behind these murderous deeds. Begin admitted that the Irgun committed these acts and that they were necessary for the establishment of a Jewish state.






The Outrage  King David Hotel

USS Liberty

On June 8, 1967 Israel used unmarked fighters and torpedo boats to launch an hour and one-half attack on the American Navy ship the USS Liberty, costing 34 American lives and 171 wounded. The Israelis first attacked the Liberty's radio towers in an attempt to stop the Sixth Fleet from learning that the Israelis were the attackers. After unmarked Israeli fighters horrendously bombed and strafed the Liberty, Israel sent in torpedo boats to finish the job. They even machine gunned the deployed life rafts in an effort to ensure that there would be no survivors (witnesses) who could expose them. Just as in the Lavon Affair, Israel hoped to blame this act of war on their enemy, the Egyptians. This time, only the courage and resourcefulness of the Liberty's crew prevented a further compounding of the travesty.

http://home.cfl.rr.com/gidusko/liberty/

The air strike on Libya
On April 15, 1986 US war planes bombed the Libyan cities of Tripoli and Benghazi. They destroyed the home of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi and killed at least 30 civilians, including many children. Gaddafi himself, the main target of the air strike, was not hurt.

According to Victor Ostrovski, a defector from the Israeli Mossad, the US was tricked into bombing Libya when the Israeli Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Tripoli which sent out fake orders to "terrorists" which the US could intercept. The faked orders caused Libya to be blamed for a German disco bombing. As a result of this fake transmission, Reagan used it as evidence to bomb Libya killing 30 innocent people including Qaddhafi’s baby daughter.

http://100777.com/node/101


Attempt to blow the Mexican Congress

It was Israelis who were armed with 9mm pistols, nine grenades, explosives, three detonators and 58 bullets and caught in Mexico in an attempt to blow the Mexican Congress up on October 10, 2001, one month after 911. Curiously these Israelis were found not with Israeli passports in their possession but with Pakistani passports. The Israelis were booked for conspiracy to destroy a building by means of an explosive by the Mexican police.

If they were successful in blowing up the Mexican Congress then like 911 it would have been blamed on Muslim terrorists, especially if Pakistani passports were found at the scene of the crime. They got caught red-handed here and only God knows how many other incidents that innocent Muslims are being blamed for that was really done by Israelis.

See the following link for more on this:


9/11

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=kwSmFnlwrK0&feature=related

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw&NR=1

BBC Reported Building 7 Collapse 20 Minutes Before It Fell

http://youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29gbc&feature=related

Israeli 911 terrorism ties FOX news report now CLASSIFIED

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=j7T4DhDLPrY&eurl=http://zionofascism.wordpress.com/2007/03/30/evidence-of-israels-911-involvement/


ISRAEL WAS BEHIND FAKE EVIDENCE


It is now official: Israeli spies fed fake evidence to US government

http://nowarforisrael.com/

http://www.amconmag.com/03_24_03/cover.html

Netanyahu: 9/11 attacks good for Israel

ttp://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/975574.html

16/04/2008

The Israeli newspaper Ma'ariv on Wednesday reported that Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu told an audience at Bar Ilan university that the September 11, 2001 terror attacks had been beneficial for Israel.

"We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq," Ma'ariv quoted the former prime minister as saying. He reportedly added that these events "swung American public opinion in our favor

mossad and 9-11

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDsW4DyyZvU

Zelikow's Key Role in 9/11 Cover-Up

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nbak9KOINgo&feature=related


Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth
http://pl911truth.com/


9 11 truth
http://www.911truth.org/

Architects& Engineers for 9 11 truth
http://www.ae911truth.org/

Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice
http://stj911.org/


pilots for truth 9 11

http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/

7/7 London Bombings

"Ludicrous Diversion – 7/7 London Bombings", Documentary, 28mn
You probably think you know what happened that day. But you don’t.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4943675105275097719
==============================

Israelis support nuking Iran

FROM THE HORSE'S MOUTH:
Poll: 71% of Israelis want U.S. to strike Iran
Poll: Most Israelis support using nukes

*****************************

The zionazi criminals don’t realize that the world would never be as merciful or as compassionate as the Palestinians when retribution comes to plague them
They never learned the basic lesson:
Those who sow hatred can only blame themselves when hatred comes bouncing back at them in multi-fold

nahidazionists get the hell out of Palestine’
~ Helen Thomas

To defeat the aggressors is not enough to make peace durable. The main thing is to discard the ideology that generates war.
 ~ Ludwig von Mises

Courage doesn't always roar. Sometimes courage is the little voice at the end of the day that says . . .  I'll try again tomorrow.      
 ~ Anne Henninghake


Justice in the Bazaar

Posted by Qifa Nabki ,
The Syrian-Saudi negotiations over the fate of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) are a persistent topic in the Arab press these days.

According to an interview with Saad al-Hariri which will appear tomorrow in al-Hayat, an agreement about how to mitigate the STL’s repercussions has already been reached, and is just waiting implementation on the Lebanese scene. For background on this issue,

I recommend reading the International Crisis Group report, as well as a recent opinion piece by Michael Young.

It will be interesting to see how the Syrian-Saudi agreement is unveiled and presented to the Lebanese public. The gist of the “concessions” expected of Hariri is straightforward: he will be required to help distance Lebanon from the Tribunal in some fashion. Whether this involves going so far as to end Lebanon’s cooperation with and recognition of the STL is uncertain, but we can assume that he will, at the very least, cast doubt on the legitimacy of the STL’s proceedings, and categorically reject the validity of any indictments against members of Hizbullah.

On the other hand, the question of what concessions (if any) will be extracted from Hizbullah is much more perplexing. Unlike Hariri — who has already made some initial concessions  — Hizbullah has not indicated that it will budge from its maximalist position of rejecting the STL as a Zionist plot targeting the resistance. In the International Crisis Group’s discussion of the “contours of a possible deal” (see pp. 28-29) there is no hint at what price Hizbullah and its allies might pay to make the STL become a distant memory. The formulas presented are all essentially March 14 concessions.

The current situation reminds me of an encounter I had several years ago when I was living in Morocco, studying the music of the great chaabi ensemble, Nass el-Ghiwane. I spent the first couple months of my stay in Fes, where I befriended a rug merchant named Ahmad who owned a small shop deep in the old medina.

Over the course of the year, I bought several rugs from Ahmad, which I gave as gifts to friends and family members. As one might expect, each purchase was preceded by a long bargaining process, accompanied by cups of mint tea and endless amusing discussions about history, religion, and politics.

As I neared the end of my stay in Morocco, I set off to visit Ahmad with the intention of buying one last rug from him. It was a beautiful piece: a large, hand-knotted crimson rug with faint tracings in an eggshell color, hanging on a wall in the shop. I had been eyeing it covetously throughout my time in Morocco, but the asking price was well above my budget: $400, which was at least four times more than my piteous, penniless self had previously spent on any other rug in his shop.

When I came to him and expressed my interest, he smiled knowingly and replied: “Of course, ya habibi. Name your price.”

I gritted my teeth and said, almost apologetically, “I’ve got a hundred dollars. Can we make a deal?”
As it turns out, I was telling the truth. I had no more than one hundred dollars left in my savings, but Ahmad didn’t know that, and so he assumed that my offer was  part of a routine bargaining strategy. He thereupon settled into his familiar protestations about the value of the rug, the craftsmanship, and the great loss he would incur by giving it away for such an insultingly low sum.

Over the next two hours, Ahmad’s asking price fell steadily as we chatted in our usual meandering way. My offer, however, remained the same: “One hundred dollars. Take it or leave it.”

As afternoon turned to evening, a group of Ahmad’s friends assembled in his shop, watching this negotiation with amusement. Finally, Ahmad gave up. “Ok. One hundred dollars,” he said. “But you have to buy me a pack of cigarettes.”

I started to insist that I didn’t even have the money to buy him a pack of cigarettes, when his brother leapt to his feet, grabbed me by the arm, and led me outside.
“You will go buy him a pack of cigarettes,” he hissed at me,
 pressing some of his own money into my hand.
I was baffled. “Why? What does it matter?”

His brother shook his head and left me in the street holding a couple of coins for cigarette money.
It took me a while to understand this strange exchange, but it eventually became clear. The symbolic value of the pack of cigarettes was more important to Ahmad, in the context of our bargaining process, than the $100 I paid him at the end. Why? Because it represented something above my original offer. It was more than what I had originally offered to pay. Even if it was only a paltry amount, and even if the whole bargaining process was an elaborate charade, the fact that he had extracted something from me that I hadn’t been willing to pay was a necessary condition of a successful transaction.

This is not so different, I would suggest, than the position that Hariri finds himself in today. He has already brought his “price” down by exonerating Syria and recognizing the existence of “false witnesses”. He has also exonerated Hizbullah’s leadership from any connection with the crime and offered to help sell the narrative that the perpetrators were rogue elements. All that’s left is for him to join his opponents in claiming that the STL was infiltrated by Israel and that his father was the victim of a Zionist plot.

That he can probably do. But I would argue that he needs something in return — the proverbial “pack of cigarettes” — or else, I believe, he will not be able to contain the fallout of Sunni humiliation and frustration that will result from the lopsided transaction.

This doesn’t mean that any paltry concession by Hizbullah will be enough to enable Hariri and his government to sweep the STL under the rug. Depending on the nature of the evidence in support of the indictments, selling at such a low price — with or without a pack of cigarettes from Hizbullah — may be more politically damaging for Hariri than simply resigning from his post. But in the absence of some kind of meaningful concession from Hizbullah, it is hard to see what kind of solution Syria and Saudi Arabia could possibly have in store.

Berri, Hariri: Saudi-Syrian Initiative Completed, Effective



River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

IOF Strike Gaza, Execute Old Palestinian Man, kidnaps five Palestinians hours after being released from PA

Qawasme's wife

07/01/2011 Israeli occupation troops shot an old Palestinian man in Al-Khalil early Friday while he was sleeping in his bed. The man killed was identified as Amr Qawasme, 66.

Qawasme 's son said that "Israeli soldiers enter our house while my mother was praying so they put her in my disabled brother’s room, then they entered my father’s bedroom and shot him.

The soldiers left the house after they arrested the citizen Wael Mohammed Said Al-Bitar, who lives on the first floor in our house. "

"After the soldiers arrested Wael Bitar, we went into our house and were surprised to see our father dying in a pool of blood. We didn't hear any gun-fire, they must have used silencers," he explained. Qawasme’s son also said that they "immediately opened fire when they came into my father's room, without verifying his identity."

Medical sources said an old Palestinian man, who was reported to be an unarmed civilian, was brought dead to hospital with several bullet wounds to the upper part of his body.

An Israel military spokesperson expressed “regret” for the mistake of killing an innocent civilian who was not involved in any “terror activity”. "He was not a target, it was definitely not intentional," he said.

The Israeli army was raiding Al-Khalil to re-arrest six Hamas members that the Palestinian Authority had released only the day following an intervention from the emir of Qatar. The PA had taken the six into custody in September in a campaign to arrest Hamas activists after a drive-by shooting against Israeli settlers in the area.

Hamas movement said that it “holds the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank responsible, along with the occupation, for this crime,” Hamas spokesperson Sami Abu Zuhri told reporters at a news conference in Gaza City, describing it as a “dangerous escalation.”

In a separate development, Israeli warplanes have carried out three airstrike on the Gaza Strip, but there is no word yet on any possible casualties. Two of the air raids targeted the east of Gaza City and the third airstrike hit an area east of Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip. The Israeli military has not commented on the attack so far.

Israeli occupation kidnaps five Palestinians hours after being released from PA


[ 07/01/2011 - 12:33 PM ]

AL-KHALIL, (PIC)-- IOF troops kidnapped, Friday at dawn, five Palestinian men from the southern West Bank city of al-Khalil, only hours after being released from PA jails after spending 40 days on hunger strike reflecting a high degree of security coordination between Abbas’s militia and the IOF.

The wife of Wael al-Bitar told PIC that a large number of IOF troops raided their neighbourhood and entered her uncle’s flat and killed while he was asleep thinking that he was her husband.

“It seems they went by mistake to my uncle’s flat, they killed him and assaulted his family then forced them on the street,” she said.

She considered what has happened an exchange of roles between the PA and the Israeli occupation and held Mahmoud Abbas personally responsible for what happened and added: “let the whole world see what happened to us at the hands of Fatah’s authority and the [Israeli] occupation in the West bank.”

Local sources also informed the PIC correspondent that IOF troops raided at the same time all homes of the captives who were only released on Thursday evening from Abbas’s jails.

The sources said that as well as Wael al-Bitar, the IOF kidnapped Mohannad Neiroukh (who was unconscious), Majd Obaid, Ahmad al-Oweiwi and Wael al-Qawasmi.

The IOF action created a state of rage in the city with the people and the families of the kidnapped men holding Abbas’s authority full responsibile for what happened.

The PA had released six men after went on a hunger strike for 40 days to protest being kept in jail despite a court ruling over a year ago ordering their release.


River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Israel's Knesset Targets Leftist Organizations

 by Stephen Lendman

Numerous previous articles explained Israel's hardline anti-democratic agenda, several accessed through the following links:

http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2010/10/israeli-knessets-anti-democratic-agenda.html

http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2010/11/lurching-toward-gomorrah-growing.html

http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2010/12/israels-sham-democracy.html

Now the latest. On January 5, Israel's Knesset, by a 47 - 16 vote, approved forming a parliamentary committee to investigate leftist Israeli organizations. Among them, B'Tselem issuing a same day press release headlined, "B'Tselem proud of its activities and completely transparent. The Knesset's decision is what harms Israel's international status," adding:

"We are proud of our work to promote human rights in the Occupied Territories, which is conducted legally and with complete transparency. Persecution and attempts at silencing will not stop us. In a democracy, criticism of the government is not only legitimate - it is essential. B'Tselem calls on all members of the Knesset to hold an informed debate on the information provided by human rights organizations, instead of harassing and smearing those who dare to question and criticize."

The statement continued, saying:

-- the inquiry's purpose isn't to establish facts; it's to smear;

-- B'Tselem's donor list is public information, available online;

-- its financial reports are available at the NGO Registrar's office that just awarded B'Tselem a Certification of Proper Administration; and

-- if MKs care about Israel's deteriorating international standing, "they should stop promoting parliamentary initiatives that will only cause it to plummet even further."

Israel's media are all over this story. In America, major broadsheets like The New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune and Wall Street Journal ignored it, showing their usual one-sided support for Israel's worst crimes, belligerence and extremism, including by legislators.

Even Israel's right-wing Jerusalem Post (JP) expressed concern. One article headlined, "Left-wing NGOs mad Knesset to probe foreign funding," said:

"Left-wing NGOs railed on Wednesday evening against the" Knesset vote. "Hours after (its debate), Government Services Minister Michael Eitan (Likud) wrote a letter to Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu complaining that Deputy Minister Danny Ayalon had intentionally misled MKs and the public" with information he provided as justification for the probe.

JP's earlier July 15, 2010 Ruth Eglash article headlined, "Legislation against left-wing NGOs could harm Israelis," saying:

"A spate of legislation aimed at local NGOs critical of Israel could end up limiting freedom of speech and expression of every Israeli," according to Ronit Heyd, Executive Director of SHATIL, The New Israel Fund's Empowerment and Training Center for Social Change Organizations in Israel, saying:

"The most worrying trend over the last year is that most people do not really understand that our democracy is now under serious threat. Currently it only affects a certain group in society; human rights organizations, (but) in the future it could affect other communities and individuals who do not agree with the mainstream view or the views and policies of the country's decision-makers."

At the time, besides other extremist Knesset legislation, she referred to a new bill passed its preliminary reading to prohibit Israelis from backing the global BDS movement, or receive money from supportive international organizations.

Heyd added:

"There is a serious need for concern when the government is trying to silence dissenting voices, trying to silence any voice in society that criticizes the way the government is working."

Doing so is the essence of despotism, the track Israel, like America, is further along on than most people in either country recognize.

On January 5, Haaretz writer Jonathan Lis headlined, "Leftist groups: 'Witch hunt' against us will destroy democracy in Israel," saying:

"Israeli left-wing organizations decried Wednesday('s) Knesset plenum decision to support a panel of inquiry to investigate certain groups suspected of 'delegitimizing' the Israeli Defense Forces."

The next step involves a Knesset House Committee debate, then a vote on whether foreign states, international organizations or others linked to alleged terrorist groups provide funding.

According to Peace Now Director-General Yariv Oppenheimer:

Knesset approval is "another step on the path toward wiping out democracy in Israel" by trying to persecute critics.

The New Israel Fund (NIF) said the decision "proves how much the stature of Israeli democracy has deteriorated - even in the house of legislators," acting more like despots than legitimate lawmakers. "Democracy cannot function properly without freedom of expression, freedom to sound criticism of the system, and active human rights groups. The political persecution of human rights groups cause great damage to Israel across the world, and this is precisely what will lead to the delegitimization (of Israel) and the representation of it as a McCarthyite state in which a witch hunt is taking place" lawlessly.

The Public Committee Against Torture in Israel (PCATI) called the move "authoritarian, immoral and illegitimate," adding that it mourns the "slow but sure death" of Israeli democratic values.

In total, 16 human rights groups signed an open letter in protest, including B'Tselem, the Association of Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI), Yesh Din, Machsom Watch, Adalah, Mossawa Center, Ir Amin and Hotline for Migrant Workers.

"Investigate us all, we have nothing to hide," they said. "You are invited to read our reports and our publications. We will be happy if for a change you relate in a germane way to our questions instead of trying to besmirch us. It did not work in the past and it will not work this time."

A second Jonathan Lis article headlined, "Knesset votes to probe Israeli groups accused of 'delegitimizing' IDF," saying:

The approval came "after Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein ruled in August that no investigation should be launched against such groups." Opposition MKs and human rights groups vocally disapproved. As a result, the Knesset debate was stormy, "charged, (and) filled with heckling and interruptions." So much so that security guards were present "to prevent physical altercations" between opposing sides.

MK Nitzan Horowitz called the initiative "a shame on the Knesset....The persecution campaign against human rights and citizens rights groups has reached a new low. (It's) a brutal act of political persecution using a coalition majority and Knesset funding, under the legal guise of an investigation committee. Human rights and citizens rights groups save the honor of Israel in the world and maintain its character as a democratic state." Extremist MKs want to destroy it. "All to whom Israeli democracy is dear must oppose this committee of persecution."

Gideon Levy's Critical Op-Ed

In Haaretz on January 6, he headlined, "When did it become illegal to be a leftist in Israel," saying:

"The police, the legal system, the Knesset, the Shin Bet, and the IDF have joined forces with the propagandists of the right to act as prosecutors without a trial." Coming next perhaps will be "declar(ing) the left an illegal entity....From then on, whoever thinks left, acts left, demonstrates left or tolerates left will belong in jail."

Israel stands humiliated, shamed and exposed for its extremism. As a result, a "land-stealing settler is a Zionist; a warmongering right-winger is a patriot; an inciting rabbi is a spiritual leader; a racist who expels foreigners is a loyal citizen. Only the leftist is a traitor."

What Knesset members proposed would even make Joe McCarthy and some of today's American right-wingers blush. Though never finding any, McCarthy targeted alleged communists for political advantage. America's current Congress pursues terrorists, again for the same purpose and as justification for Washington's imperial wars.

As a result, personal safety in both countries is jeopardized. The common atmosphere is charged with extremism, racism, militarism, and opposition to anyone challenging state authority, especially its most lawless aspects, targeting innocent people at home while rampaging abroad against groups or nations posing no threat to either country.

In Israel, solidifying occupation control reigns terror against anyone pursuing freedom and justice issues, and without pretext waging all-out war, justifying it as self-defense against terrorism.

For Jews and Israeli Arabs, "(o)ne single law could simplify matters: Let every Israeli know that (it's) forbidden to believe in a just Israel, forbidden to fight against any of its injustices, forbidden to struggle for its soul."

It begs the question: is Israel's democracy so anathema that even blowing its cover is acceptable. Targeting human rights defenders proves it.

A Final Comment

Ramzy Clark, former US Attorney General, now progressive anti-war activist and International Action Center founder led a solidarity delegation to Gaza, beginning on January 5 when he met with Palestine's elected Prime Minister, Ismail Haniyeh.

Their schedule also includes meetings with human rights activists, survivors of loved ones killed during Cast Lead, and public meetings to address attendees. On return, they plan "to help bring truth about Gaza to the people of the United States," denied it by America's dominant media.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

posted by Steve Lendman @ 2:30 AM

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Palestinian refugees in Brazil live in miserable condition

[ 07/01/2011 - 10:54 AM ]

RAMALLAH, (PIC)-- Hundreds of Palestinian refugees forced out of their homes in war-torn Iraq and settled eventually in Brazil have complained of the miserable conditions they and their families are experiencing because no one is taking care of them.

In an appeal they sent to international human rights institutions, including the UNHCR, the refugees asserted they haven’t tasted the meaning of living since they arrived in Brazil two years ago, adding that many of them suffer from chronic diseases but no adequate medical attention was given to them in this regard.

"Many of us are sick but no one extend a hand of help for us… the ESAF organization that supervise us isn't fit to care for animals let alone caring for human being? This organization pays no respect to the simplest human needs… if they promise they tell a lie, and they rarely visit us… they don’t mind what happens to us", said the refugees in the appeal call.

They added, "The UNHCR which is the sponsor of all this program specified a period of two years for a humanitarian program it had planned for us since we left Iraq, but the period has expired now, and they told us to mange our own affairs from now on".

But the refugees confirmed they couldn’t manage their own affairs due to the poor economic condition and inadequate job opportunities in Brazil that made them unable to find job and live independently.

"We are foreigners here, and we have a culture, language, and traditions which are different from that of Brazilians that must be taken into consideration before anyone ask us to manage our own affair", the refugees underlined, fearing they and their families would end up begging in the streets and searching for food in the garbage.

As far as the Palestinian embassy in Brazil is concerned, the refugees underscored that officials of the embassy did not even bother themselves to pay a visit to the refugees despite the persistent appeals they are sending to them to look into their situation.

"If no one could ensure an honorable life conditions for us and for our children, then they should work hard to return us back to our own country Palestine" they stressed.

Tens of thousands of Palestinian refugees living in Iraq were forced out of their homes at gunpoint at the hands of armed Iraqi militias shortly after the USA and its allies invaded Iraq and ousted Iraq's President Saddam Hussein in 2003.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

An Assassination, or a declaration of war?

By Dr. Bouthaina Shaaban

Western newspapers were unanimous last week that Israeli intelligence was behind the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientist Majid Shahriari and wounding his colleague Fereidoun Abbasi in Tehran (The Independent, 30/11/2010; The Guardian, 2/12/2010; Haaretz, 4/12/2010). An article in Time magazine said that Mosad death squads, in cooperation with American and Western intelligence agencies carried out the assassination in order to “slow down the Iranian nuclear program as an alternative for a military strike”.

It is remarkable that three events happened on the same day: November 29, 2010: publishing WikiLeaks documents mostly about “concern” regarding the Iranian nuclear program, assassinating Majid Shahriari and the appointment of Tamir Pardo as head of Mossad, the agency most renowned worldwide for its involvement in assassinations. Some Western papers even boasted that the assassination was the “latest gift presented by former Mossad chief Meir Dagan”.

No Israeli source had any qualms acknowledging that the Mossad had death squads operating against those considered by the Israeli government as Palestinian, Arab and even Western enemies. It had actually admitted that it killed Iranian nuclear scientist Ardashir Hosseinpour in 2007. He was poisoned by gas. A European intelligence official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said “Israel has shown no hesitation in assassinating weapons scientists of hostile regimes in the past.

They did it with Iraq and they will do it with Iran when they can”. (See “Israel launches covert war against Iran” (The Daily Telegraph, Feb., 16, 2009). Reva Bhalla, a senior analyst with Stratfor, the US private intelligence company with strong government security connections, said “the strategy was to take out key people” (Ibid.). Israeli analyst Yossi Melman adds that “Israel is part of a detailed and elaborate international effort to slow down the Iranian program" (Ibid.).
Sources concur that Mossad carries out its operations in cooperation and coordination with Western intelligence agencies which share Mossad’s objectives, as in the case of assassinating the Hamas operative Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in Dubai.

A report drafted by the human rights division at the US State Department (March 3, 2009) revealed that Mossad, in coordination with US forces in Iraq managed to assassinate 350 Iraqi nuclear scientists, 300 university professors, in addition to hundreds of army officers, pilots and experts in designing and launching missiles. The American report said that the main task of the Mossad death squad, operating in Iraq since the American invasion of 2003, was to eliminate distinguished Iraqi nuclear scientists and former civilian and military engineers after Washington failed to persuade them to cooperate and work in the United States. Israel, however, saw that the mere existence of these scientists constituted a threat to Israeli long-term national security.

According to most published reports, Mossad is working in cooperation with American and Western intelligence; therefore, it is naïve for the Arabs to ask, or expect, any Western country to condemn Israel’s deliberate acts of killing whether against Palestinian leaders like Ahmad Yasin and Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, or Iranians, or anyone the Israeli government thinks that he threatens its national security. The question is: what is the difference between Mossad’s acts: murder, poisoning, explosions and assassinations, and the acts of the terrorist groups the West continues to complain about because they seek to eliminate those they think pose a threat to them? Isn’t killing the same in both cases? And where is the international law and legality the West keeps talking about as a mark of civilization which separates them from terrorism?

After the WikiLeaks scandal, it has become clear that Western countries justify what they want with disregard to human rights, peoples’ interests or the law. The way they treat other peoples is not without Western racism and superiority. Otherwise, why wouldn’t Arab countries possess nuclear knowledge, since they have signed the non-proliferation treaty, while Israel and the United States have not signed it and use these weapons whenever they want?

So, we should read the United States’ withdrawal on Dec. 7, 2010 of its demand that Israel freeze settlement building as an acknowledgement on its part that it could not be “an impartial mediator” for peace between Arabs and the Israelis. This claim has been belied by American funding of the Israeli arsenal of mass destruction weapons, Israeli settlement and supporting the brutal Israeli blockade on civilians in Gaza and preventing them from remaining on their land or restoring their rights. It has become clear that the United States has handed over the running of its Middle East policy to Israel; it has given in to Israel’s desire for killing and settlement building. It has also been proven that the West is working in cooperation with Israel against Arabs and Muslims whenever Israel wants to kill more of them. What is new in this regard is perhaps that the old form of wars is over because it proved costly and unviable, particularly after the war on Iraq in 2003, on Lebanon in 2006, on Gaza in 2008-2009 and the ongoing war in Afghanistan which is becoming a quagmire with no end in sight.

So, killing, assassination, sabotage and espionage have, from now on, become the official policy used by Israel and its Western allies to destabilize Arab and Muslim countries. Does not this mean that resistance, in all its forms, of this bloody and evil alliance against Arabs – and which has proven its effectiveness against Israeli military arsenal - is the most valid method in today’s wars in order to achieve and maintain independence, to gain and defend freedom and achieve scientific progress?

Prof. Bouthaina Shaaban is Political and Media Advisor at the Syrian Presidency, and former Minister of Expatriates. She is also a writer and professor at Damascus University since 1985. She’s got Ph.D. in English Literature from Warwick University , London . She was the spokesperson for Syria . She was nominated for Nobel Peace Prize in 2005. She can be reached through nizar_kabibo@yahoo.com

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

US Budget Cuts: Less Troops to Afghanistan, F-35 Production Freeze

07/01/2011 The US is planning to cut its defense expenditure by $78bn in a move that includes freezing the Pentagon's budget by 2015, shrinking army and marine troop levels and abandoning plans for the acquisition of new weapons technology.

The Pentagon overhauled the Lockheed Martin Corp F-35 fighter program for the second time in a year and said it would buy 41 Boeing Co F/A-18 warplanes over the next three years to offset slower production of the Lockheed plane.

The budget cuts are subject to the approval of the US congress, and involve a further $100bn in cost saving measures. The changes mean that the military would see annual budget increases that barely exceed inflation in coming years and that its budget will effectively remain frozen in 2015 and 2016.

US Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates on Thursday said the cuts are a result of the "extreme fiscal duress" facing the country.

In a news conference, Gates said the White House's proposed budget for the Pentagon next year would be $553 billion, excluding the cost of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, less than a 1 percent increase over what it requested for 2011. Although he said the military could live with flat budgets in the coming years, Gates warned that deeper cuts in troop levels, overseas bases and weapons programs would be "risky at best and potentially calamitous."

Admiral Mike Mullen, the chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff, said he thinks the war in Afghanistan will shrink by 2014, when the US plans to hand over security responsibilities to the Afghan government.

This comes while the United States has ordered an additional 1,400 Marines to southern Afghanistan to preempt a Taliban spring offensive, despite a planned troop drawdown starting in July. This announcement was approved by Gates on Wednesday.

Sources in Washington told Ynet that the halt in the production of the advanced stealth jets would not affect the expected delivery of 20 planes to Israel, but that any additional request for combat aircraft on Israel's part would be affected.

Israel's Ambassador to Washington Michael Oren said about three weeks ago that in spite of the failed Israeli- Palestinian talks, Tel Aviv still expected to receive the second F-35 squadron.

The first deal states that Israel would receive an F-35 squadron from 2015 to 2017 for $96 million per plane, along with simulators, spare parts and maintenance equipment, at a total cost of $2.75 billion.

But according to Gates, freezing the F-35 project would save the Pentagon some $4 billion. He said he was aware of the fact that in order to maintain American interests in the world, the US Army must strictly examine its expense procedures.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Rawabi developer Masri helps deepen Israel's grip on West Bank

Ali Abunimah, The Electronic Intifada, 6 January 2011

Bashar Masri with Leocadia Zak, Acting Director of the United States Trade Development Agency, after singing an agreement at Rawabi, March 2010. (Haytham Othman/MaanImages)

Bashar Masri, the Palestinian businessman and CEO of the company that is developing the Rawabi luxury real estate project in the occupied West Bank, appears to be actively helping Israel deepen its hold on the Palestinian economy despite his earlier claims that he is trying to help end this relationship.

On 30 December, The Electronic Intifada reported that the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions National Committee (BNC) in Palestine had expressed serious concerns following reports that a dozen Israeli companies have been contracted to take part in the construction of Rawabi, billed as the "first planned Palestinian city" ("Role of Israeli firms raises boycott concerns about Rawabi").

In comments sent to The Electronic Intifada prior to the 30 December article, Masri claimed that using Israeli firms was a matter of necessity due to severe Israeli restrictions on the Palestinian economy in the occupied West Bank.

Masri is CEO of the Ramallah-based Bayti Real Estate Investment Company which is building Rawabi. He is also founder of the firm Massar International which along with Qatari Diar is financing the project.

Masri stated "It is also a well-known fact that our economy is very much dependent on Israel. Of course we do not like it but we have no choice."

But in fact Masri appears to have made the choice to work closely with the Israeli government and businesses in order to bring even more Israeli companies into the occupied West Bank. This not only makes it harder for Palestinian firms to establish themselves against Israeli businesses which have a built-in advantage since Israel is the occupying power, but is in flagrant violation of the 2005 Palestinian civil society call for boycott, divestment and sanctions.

On 28 January 2010, for example, Masri gave a talk in Tel Aviv co-hosted by the Israel-America Chamber of Commerce and a body called the Israeli-Palestinian Chamber of Commerce, titled "Prospects for Investing in the Palestinian Authority." Advertised in Hebrew on the Israel-America Chamber of Commerce website, attendees were required to pay an entrance fee of up to 200 shekels ($56 US).

The Israeli-Palestinian Chamber of Commerce (IPCC) appears to be a body established and controlled by Israel to facilitate even deeper Israeli control and exploitation of the Palestinian economy. One of its projects, for example, is to produce a "Palestinian Business Guide" to help Israeli firms benefit from the advantages that military occupation as well as collaboration between the occupation army and Palestinian Authority security forces confer on them. As stated on the IPCC website:

"Trade between Israel and the Palestinian Authority is vast and in 2008 reached 15 billion [shekels] [$4.25 billion US]. In 2009 it continued to flourish as a result of the improvement in the security situation, measures taken by the Israeli government and increased trust between the two business communities. In spite of all this, there is no full and up-to-date information about the Palestinian market available for Israeli and foreign companies who wish to find business partners in the West Bank. Therefore, the IPCC has decided to compile a comprehensive study of the Palestinian economy, which will offer up-to-date information about businesses, their background and products, thus enabling Israeli and foreign companies [to] find partners in a quicker and easier manner."

IPCC also says it works closely with the Israeli ministry of foreign affairs. It was launched at a May 2009 "gala" in Tel Aviv, attended by Quartet envoy Tony Blair, Israeli Vice Prime Minister Silvan Shalom and Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon of the notoriously racist Yisrael Beiteinu party. More than 200 Israeli businesspersons attended the gala and among the thirty or so Palestinians who attended, according to the IPCC website, were Bashar Masri, Nafez Hirbawi, Ziad al-Bandak and Mahmoud Abu Ein, all businessmen with close ties to the Western-backed Palestinian Authority of Mahmoud Abbas. Al-Bandak is a longtime advisor to Abbas and former PA minister.

Underlining that IPCC is part and parcel of the Israeli occupation, the organization's CEO is none other than Israeli Lt. Col (ret) Avi Nudelman who, according to his resume on the IPCC website, spent most of his military career either in intelligence or as a military ruler in the occupied West Bank. In 1998 Nudelman "served as the head of the security coordination office (DCO) in the Ramallah district, and later the head of the liaison for the Palestinian security apparatus in the West Bank." From 2003-06, Nudelman "served in the Strategic Division in the IDF [Israeli army] as the head of the Palestinian branch," according to the IPCC website.

Preceding Nudelman as head of the IPCC was Ofir Gendleman, long an Israeli diplomat, who was appointed last May by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as Israel's "Arabic-language spokesman for public diplomacy." No other staff or board members are listed on the IPCC website.

As The Electronic Intifada also reported on 30 December, the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions National Committee (BNC) specifically criticized Masri's Rawabi project for decisions that "undermine the boycott campaign and principles of national consensus among Palestinians, as well as promot[ing] a 'business-as-usual' approach to Israel."

Masri's cooperation with the Israeli government to deepen Israeli involvement in the West Bank stands in contrast with recent confirmation in a 2008 cable from the US embassy in Tel Aviv, made public by Wikileaks, that Israel operated a policy of deliberately keeping the economy of the besieged Gaza Strip "on the brink of collapse" ("Cashless in Gaza?"). One of the architects of the policy was senior Israeli government advisor Dov Weisglass who notoriously explained in 2006 that "the idea is to put the Palestinians [in Gaza] on a diet but not to make them die of hunger" ("Gaza on the brink of explosion as aid cut-off starts to bite," The Observer, 16 April 2006).

Masri previously confirmed to The Electronic Intifada reports that he had hired Weisglass, now a private attorney, to assist Masri in a failed bid to purchase a financially-troubled Israeli settlement housing project in Jabal Mukaber, occupied East Jerusalem. Masri, however, did not respond to repeated requests for comment for this article.

The 2005 Palestinian call for boycott, divestment and sanctions urges a complete economic, academic and cultural boycott of Israel -- modeled on the one that helped end apartheid in South Africa -- until Israel respects and recognizes Palestinian rights and complies with international law.

Masri as well as other Palestinian businessmen who promote normalization with Israel seem to be doing all they can to undermine this campaign, while making handsome profits along the way.

Ali Abunimah is co-founder of The Electronic Intifada, author of One Country: A Bold Proposal to End the Israeli-Palestinian Impasse and is a contributor to The Goldstone Report: The Legacy of the Landmark Investigation of the Gaza Conflict (Nation Books).

Editor's Note: This article was corrected to reflect that Bashar Masri's talk at the Israel-America Chamber of Commerce was scheduled for 28 January 2010, and not 28 January 2011.

Israel and Arab Jews

Thursday, January 6, 2011 at 8:35AM Gilad Atzmon
The amazing story of Naeim Giladi

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Jerusalemite officials urge Masri to get hunger strikers released from PA jails


[ 06/01/2011 - 04:51 PM ]

OCCUPIED JERUSALEM, (PIC)-- The Jerusalemite officials facing exile from occupied Jerusalem urged Palestinian businessman Munib Al-Masri to intervene to have the hunger strikers released from the Palestinian authority's jails and help end their suffering.

This came during Masri's visit to their sit-in tent at the Red Cross headquarters on Wednesday.

The officials, two lawmakers and one former minister, stated during the meeting that the PA and its security apparatuses are intransigent on the release of the hunger strikers and refuse to respect the law.

They added that this situation obstructs any efforts made to end the inter-Palestinian division.

Masri came along with his wife and his elder son to the sit-in tent and he listened to the latest developments on Israel's daily violations in Jerusalem and its intent to exile the three officials from this city.

For its part, the family of detainee Muhannad Nairoukh, one of the hunger strikers in PA jails, said the PA intelligence resumed interrogating its son as a prelude to submitting his file to the military prosecutor during the coming hours.

The mother of Nairoukh said that she saw her son Muhannad very exhausted as he was being interrogated by PA intelligence officers.

In a separate incident, a large number of PA security militia men and women stormed on Wednesday Shams company which is owned by the family of Tamam Abu Assaud, a noted national female figure who is being held in a PA jail in Nablus.

The militia women slapped Najayeb, the daughter of Abu Assaud, verbally abused her, confiscated her cell phone and handed her a summons from the PA intelligence.

The daughter of Abu Assaud is exposed to constant harassment by the PA intelligence officers in order to pressure her to stop talking to the media about her imprisoned mother.

Palestinian citizens released recently from PA jails reported that the intelligence would hold a military trial against Abu Assaud in the coming days.

The PA security militias also kidnapped two Palestinian citizens affiliated with Hamas Movement in Ramallah city, according to local sources on Thursday.

A PA militia court in Jericho city sentenced detainee Yasser Amro from Al-Khalil city to eight months in prison. Amro was an ex-detainee in Israeli jails.

Father of hunger striker: My son is still on hunger strike

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Iraq Was Heaven Says The Last Jew in Iraq

Thursday, January 6, 2011 at 8:28AM Gilad Atzmon



River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian