BRITTISH IMPERIAL COMMANDER OF AFGHANISTAN ADMITS US ,ZIONIST TURKEY,QATAR,SAUDIS ARMED REBELS... UK ‘may be drawn into Syria action’
Britain will find it increasingly difficult to avoid taking part in action in Syria, a former Army commander has warned. Colonel Richard Kemp, who led UK forces in Afghanistan, said the escalating civil war meant it was more likely that Western governments would intervene to stop the bloodshed spreading to neighbouring countries.Col Kemp said: “Whether or not Assad falls, the question of military intervention will remain a live issue. External intervention has been under way in Syria for months, with Russia arming the regime.
“At the same time Saudi Arabia and Qatar, with US and Turkish facilitation, have been arming and funding the opposition; and this covert support has been substantially responsible for the progress opposition forces have made in recent weeks.
Options could include arming opposition fighters, diverting cash to rebel authorities or joining a coalition for military action.Col Kemp’s comments came in A Collision Course for Intervention, a paper published by the Royal United Services Institute as tension is ramped up along Syria’s borders, sparking fears of wider regional conflict.
[ED NOTES: THE ROYAL UNITED SERVICES INSTITUTE PAPER '' A COLLISION COURSE FOR INTERVENTION'' IN A FEW WORDS,
''We are not moving towards intervention but intervention is certainly moving towards us," says Professor Michael Clarke, RUSI’s director-general. I personally believe any form of Western intervention will end as badly or worse than not intervening at all but still, worth a read.
ALSO SEE: VIDEO: What the International Community can do in Syria
Ivo Daalder, US Ambassador to NATO, talks to RUSI.
[ED NOTES;THE UK MILITARY THINK TANK IS BASICALLY JUSTIFYING MILITARY INTERVENTION UNDER NATO THRU THE USUAL GUISE OF R2P,HOWEVER,WHEN ONE CONSIDERS WHO RUSI REALLY IS,WHOS NEHIND THEM AND WHAT IT STANDS FOR ,THE NEOCOLONIAL AGENDA BECOMES MORE CLEAR(SEE AT BOTTOM)...
Ivo Daalder, US Ambassador to NATO, talks to RUSI.
[ED NOTES;THE UK MILITARY THINK TANK IS BASICALLY JUSTIFYING MILITARY INTERVENTION UNDER NATO THRU THE USUAL GUISE OF R2P,HOWEVER,WHEN ONE CONSIDERS WHO RUSI REALLY IS,WHOS NEHIND THEM AND WHAT IT STANDS FOR ,THE NEOCOLONIAL AGENDA BECOMES MORE CLEAR(SEE AT BOTTOM)...
George W. Bush addresses RUSI
The important role played by RUSI within the UK military-industrial complex was attested to when George W. Bush visited London in November 2003. The only speech he made during the entire visit was co-hosted by RUSI [2]. Critics pointed to the anti-democratic symbolism of this, given that he had declined to address Parliament. The WSWS wrote "Despite his paeans to democracy, Bush chose not to address the House of Commons, the proverbial 'Mother of Parliaments', because of concern that antiwar MPs might disrupt the speech or heckle him. Instead, he spoke before a carefully vetted audience assembled under the auspices of the Royal United Services Institute and the International Institute for Strategic Studies." [3]. Rear Admiral Richard Cobbold is the director of the Royal United Services Institute for Defence Studies (RUSI) [1].
He is also the Chair of the Advisory Board of the Asia-Pacific Foundation [2].
[ED NOTES;AND NOW THE FINAL BLOW...
Commendations
I know what valuable work, in the cause of peace and security, the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies carries out in maintaining the essential links between the Armed Forces and those who make decisions under economic and political disciplines.”
|  | ||
For nearly two-hundred years, the Royal United Services Institute has driven the global debate on defence and security issues and it is now the pre-eminent forum for the innovative critical thinking that is so essential for the policy-makers of today and tomorrow.
|  | ||
As the United Kingdom’s foremost independent Defence think tank, RUSI has a long historic record of producing stimulating events, challenging research and insightful publications. In this rapidly changing defence and security environment, when the need for swift and rigorous analysis is essential, RUSI’s work is ever more important.
|  | ||
RUSI stands out as a distinctive voice in the public debate on defence, security and foreign policy, a home for innovative ideas and research, and the bearer of a proud record of 180 years of independent thinking and objective analysis.
|  | ||
As a leading platform for debates on defence and security, RUSI’s role has been quintessential in fostering cooperation, promoting dialogue and offering strategic solutions to national and international defence and security-related issues. The events it has hosted over the years and the values that it has been upholding have made it into the highly revered institution it is today.
|  | ||
RUSI continues to be among the world’s foremost venues for research and discussion on defence and security issues.
|  | ||
The Royal United Services Institute has been an acknowledged leader in the debate on defence and security, been respected around the world for its contribution over nearly two centuries to that debate, and is now leading the debate about homeland security and global terrorism.”
|  | ||
As a facilitator of the exchange of ideas and information, and as an educator of the policy-maker of the present and future, the Institute is second to none.”
|
|
0 comments:
Post a Comment