Tuesday, 22 April 2014
Mazbout asks: WHAT HAPPENED TO ANIS NACCACHE?
Listen to Nakash here
And watch him here
What a coincidence Naqash was hosted by Al-Manar on April 17 and by the Radio and the Channel of the Resistance after 2 days. So Mazbout should ask: What happened to Al-manar and Al-nour, why they host people who have different views???.
A question Mazbout will never ask because it will reveal his true face.
FOR THOSE WHO DON’T KNOW ARABIC. AS HE DID BEFORE IN REPORTING THE INTERVIEW OF MOHAMAD SADIK AL HUSAINI,MAZBOUT WAS NOT HONEST HERE.
“EGYPTIANS ARE VERY SENSITIVE TOWARDS INTERVENING IN THEIR INTERNAL AFAIRS” ANIS SAID AND ADVISED ALL TO LEAVE THE EGYPTIANS ALONE TO SOLVE THEIR PROBLEMS. CONCERNING IRAN, HE SAID, IRAN IS AGAINST ISOLATING BROTHERHOOD, BUT CAN’T CHANGE THINGS GOING ON GROUND, IRAN SHOULD MIND ITS BUSINESS, BECAUSE TAKING POSITIONS SHALL NOT CHANGE ANTHING AND WOULD SEVER THE RELATIONS WITH EGYPT. THE ELECTIONS IN EGYPT, IRAQ, ALGERIA, LEBANON, AND SYRIA, SHALL NOT CHANGE ANYTHING, THE POWER BALANCE ON GROUND WILL DECIDE THE WINNER
ِAnd finally, watch this on Iranian channel Al-aalam
Upon hearing security counselor Anis Naccache yesterday who was hosted by the Radio of the Resistance we heard surprising unexpected things from the security counselor who used to voice the Iranian view point . What we heard is a defender of al Sisi rule instead , considering him a Nasserite who will not fail the people who voted for him . Naccache considered both al Sisi and Subahi as Nasserites and therefore- whoever wins-whether al Sisi or Subahi- Egypt will be in good hands .
The thing -as we see it – is that al Sisi had already failed the Egyptians by claiming to be Nasser’s inheritor while we all know he is Mubarak’s man and served under Mubarak’s rule and probably will continue along this line . No mention of the Saudi role in supplying him with money , no mention of the Israelis funding his electoral campaign, no mention of the tightening the siege on Gaza that became worse than Mubarak’s days . Of course,
Naccache would have preferred that the Muslim Brothers were not banned but his problem is that he considers all Arab armies to be threatened equally by the western establishment and puts them all on par overlooking the fact that some of them are coordinating with Israel in security matters and have deals and agreements with the Israelis like the Egyptian army . Why put all armies on par ?
What is visible is that Naccache seems to have changed sides and is no more voicing the Iranian view point which is something we could not explain . When asked about the Iranian stand point that tends to defend the Muslim Brothers against the attempt at targeting them and excluding them from the political scene and even eliminating them . Naccache said : my advice to the Iranians is to leave Egypt alone . Let Egypt manage its own business , Egyptians will sort out their choices and fare well . Leave Egypt alone said Naccache . This to say that Iran never meddled in Egyptian affairs but have always spoken of unity and solidarity among Egyptians seeing the measures taken regarding the Muslim brothers as working against this unity and solidarity.