Saturday 2 May 2020

بين «أم هارون» و«مخرج 7»: mbc وكراً علنيّاً للتـــطبيع الثقافي



الأربعاء 29 نيسان 2020


بين «أم هارون» و«مخرج 7»: mbc وكراً علنيّاً للتـــطبيع الثقافي
من مسلسل مخرج 7
لدى مباشرة مستشار البيت الأبيض وصهر الرئيس الأميركي، جاريد كوشنير، بإطلاق صفقة القرن في حزيران (يونيو) الماضي، والحديث عن «استثمارات مالية» ستتدفق على الأراضي الفلسطينية، والدول العربية المجاورة، دخل الإعلام الخليجي وقتها على الخطّ، واضعاً كلّ ثقله للتسويق للدعاية المسمومة. راح يتلاعب بالمصطلحات ويطوّعها خدمةً للمشروع الأميركي – الصهيوني. قناة «العربية» شكّلت رأس حربة في الترويج للصفقة، من خلال ترداد كلام كوشنير بوصف الصفقة «فرصةً لمستقبل أفضل للفلسطينيين». شكل الإعلان عن «صفقة العار» المدخل الأوضح والمعلَن لتصفية القضية الفلسطينية، ومحاولة إغراق باقي الشعوب التعيسة التي تعيش بجوارها بالأموال. الخطة الأميركية، فرملت، بعد رفض فلسطيني رسمي وشعبي، واجتياح كورونا للعالم. تغيّرت الأجندات، واستحوذ الوباء على المشهد السياسي والإعلامي. لكن مع وصول شهر الصوم، بدأت تتبدى مشهدية أخرى، تتقاطع مع ما حصل قبل عام تقريباً، في دول الخليج. هذه المرة، دخل صنّاع الدراما على الخط، ووضعوا ثقلهم على شبكة mbc السعودية، واستغلوا الشهر الكريم، لبثّ مزيد من السموم، واللعب على المغالطات التاريخية، سعياً للعبور نحو بوابة التطبيع المباشر مع الاحتلال الإسرائيلي وأنسنته.
ضمن هذا السياق السياسي جاء مسلسل «أم هارون» (تأليف محمد وعلي شمس، إخراج محمد جمال العدل)، الذي نجح في إثارة الجدل منذ طرح إعلانه الترويجي قبل أيام من رمضان. تعالت الأصوات، متّهمةً المسلسل بأنسنة الجلاد، واستخدامه الدراما للولوج صوب التطبيع. المسلسل الذي مُنع في الكويت، بسبب تعارضه مع توجهات البلد الخليجي حيال الشعب الفلسطيني، تصدرت بطولته الممثلة الكويتية حياة الفهد، التي جسّدت سيرة «أم هارون» اليهودية، في إطلالة على حياة يهود الخليج، وتحديداً في الكويت خلال أربعينيات القرن الماضي. تتشارك الفهد في إنتاج العمل من خلال شركتها «الفهد» بالتعاون مع شركة «جرناس» للإماراتي أحمد الجسمي. وكلاهما يعمل كمنتج منفّذ لدى الشبكة السعودية. علماً أن المسلسل صوّر بالكامل في الإمارات، بعد حيازته إجازة نصّ هناك.
حراك إلكتروني سريع، جابه الأفكار المسمومة التي يصدّرها المسلسل، ودعا إلى مقاطعته، بما أنه يستخدم اللغة الدرامية، ويتكئ على المغالطات التاريخية، لإثارة التعاطف مع اليهود الذي يعودون إلى «أرضهم» (أي فلسطين) وفق سياق المسلسل! على رأس هذه الحملات «اتحرك» التي دعت إلى مقاطعة المسلسل، واعتباره مروّجاً «لإزالة الحاجز النفسي والعدائي» لدى العرب تجاه «إسرائيل»، من خلال الدعوة إلى التعايش معها. مع بدء حلقات المسلسل، ظهّرت أكثر فأكثر الرسائل التطبيعية والخادعة، خاصة في إخفاء أي ذكر لفلسطين، مقابل الاعتماد على الرواية الصهيونية في عودة الصهاينة إلى «إسرائيل». الجدل المثار حول المسلسل الخليجي، لم يقف عند حدود أخذ ورد عربي، بل دخل الإسرائيليون مباشرةً على الخطّ، والتقطوا الضجّة المثارة حوله، وراحوا يشيدون في إعلامهم بالعمل. وكذلك فعل المتحدّث باسم الجيش الصهيوني أفيخاي أدرعي.
«سعوديون ضد التطبيع» تصدّت للمسلسلين وعرّت مضامينهما

على مقلب مشابه، يسير بالتوازي مع «أم هارون» مسلسل آخر يندرج ضمن إطار الكوميديا: «مخرج 7» (تأليف خلف الحربي ــــ إخراج أوس الشرقي)، يتصدّر بطولته الممثل السعودي ناصر القصبي، ويقحم في حبكته، القضية الفلسطينية أيضاً. وفي بعض حواراته الذي انتشر أخيراً على السوشال ميديا، يجاهر المسلسل باعتبار أنّ «إسرائيل» ليست عدواً، متبنّياً للمرة الأولى خطاباً تطبيعياً واضحاً ومباشراً. في الحلقة الشهيرة للمسلسل، الذي يمثّل فيها القصبي دور الأب القلق على صداقة ابنه الصغير مع صبي إسرائيلي يتشارك معه الألعاب الإلكترونية، يدور حوار بين القصبي وبين الممثل راشد الشمراني. يشنّ الأخير هجوماً على الفلسطينيين، واصفاً إياهم بالأعداء، لأنهم «يهاجمون السعودية»، ومدّعياً أن المملكة «شنت حروباً» كرمى لفلسطين. لكن بحسب الشمراني، هؤلاء لم «يقدّروا» تضحيات السعودية، واعتبرهم «أسوأ من الإسرائيلي»! ويتابع الشمراني كلامه، جازماً: «إسرائيل موجودة عاجبكم أو مش عاجبكم»، ساخراً من الحديث عن نهاية «إسرائيل»، ومستخدماً خطاباً انبطاحياً استسلامياً يعتبر أننا لم نحقق شيئاً إلى يومنا هذا بخصوص القضية الفلسطينية، سوى «الكلام والجعجعة». المقطع تُرجم إلى العبرية، وعُرض على منصات الإعلام الإسرائيلي، وحظي بإشادة منه، بما فيها قناة 12 الصهيونية. إذ نقلت صفحة «سعوديون ضد التطبيع» قبل أيام هذه الإشادة واعتبار القناة الصهيونية في تقرير لها بأنّ المسلسل «ينقل رسائل إيجابية تجاه إسرائيل»، ويدعو إلى التعامل التجاري معها، ويصنف إسرائيل بأنها «ليست عدواً». وخلص تقرير القناة إلى توصيف ما حدث بأنه «تغيير جذري يتجاوز عتبة التطبيع». هكذا، بدا مسار واحد ومباشر يجمع الشبكة السعودية والإعلام الإسرائيلي، في ردّ مباشر والتقاط للغضبة العربية جراّء المضامين التي تخرج علناً للمرة الأولى درامياً. أمر حاولت التخفيف منه أو الاستخفاف به وسائل إعلامية سعودية، كصحيفة «الشرق الأوسط»، التي سمّت ما حدث بـ«فوبيا التطبيع» في محاولة لتسطيح ما يُعرض على الشبكة السعودية.
إلّا أن المنصات الافتراضية المناهضة للتطبيع لم تكتفِ بالشجب، إذ انطلقت حملات عدة على رأسها «سعوديون ضد التطبيع»، التي تضمّ أكاديميين ونشطاء سعوديين، يعملون جاهدين على تفكيك الخطاب التطبيعي المسموم من البوابة الدرامية. هؤلاء نجحوا في الأيام الماضية، في تعرية الرسائل التطبيعية في كلا المسلسلين، وعرضوا نقاشات هادئة وحاسمة، معتبرين أنّ ما تقدمه mbc، يهدف إلى تشويه الوعي التاريخي، وشرذمة الصف العربي المناصر للقضية الفلسطينية… صفّ يقف إلى جانبه السعوديون شعباً لا حكّاماً!

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

ZeroHedge, a response to Mr. Littlejohn & the future of dollar dominance

April 30, 2020


ZeroHedge, a response to Mr. Littlejohn & the future of dollar dominance
by Ramin Mazaheri for The Saker Blog
It was very pleasant and informative to read Mr. Gary Littlejohn’s April 19 article, Strengthening the US Dollar: Comments on Ramin Mazaheri. I am very happy that he agreed with my article No, the dollar will only strengthen post-corona, as usual: it’s a crisis, after all, which sought to temper the eager glee of those whom I call the “dollar demisers” with some historical facts and socialist-based analysis.
What it seems Mr. Littlejohn essentially did was combine my analysis with a very popular article from “high finance dissident” site ZeroHedge, “Down The Rabbit Hole” – The Eurodollar Market Is The Matrix Behind It All, penned by Michael Every of the Netherlands’ Rabobank, and then add his own considerable insights and commentary.
Mr. Littlejohn wrote such a fine article that I am happy to respond to both his and ZeroHedge’s articles.
He began, ”This supportive response aims to provide recent relevant evidence that many of the likely changes Mazaheri describes are already happening very quickly.”
Things are indeed happening very quickly, but they could also be arrested quicker than people think. My article was a counterweight to the idea that the US (and their Western allies, and their client/puppets) is somehow entirely out of control of this process – it is not. I hope that I have overestimated a prediction of 20-30 years more of dollar dominance, but my article demonstrated how from 2008-20 they have more than just weathered a Great Recession they primarily caused. There will be a true anti-dollar revolution, but nobody can accurately predict any revolution – who could have even predicted this Great Lockdown hysteria?
I’m very glad Mr. Littlejohn agrees with the class-based analysis that the 1% is indeed international – it is not some tinfoil-hat conspiracy claim. This fundamental tenet of socialist analysis seems odd in the West only because it is so rarely said – after all, hedge funds, billionaires and wannabe-billionaires decide the editorial policy of Western media.
But, above all, this remains a competition between two ideologies: capitalist-imperialist cultures (and their repressed client states) and socialist-inspired cultures. The latter culture acknowledges this openly – the former hide and denies it, famously declaring an ideological “end of history“. Both of these cultures remain supranational in scope and reach, even if capitalist-imperialists continue to falsely assume their global political dominance and persist with their “clash of civilisations” (which first came for the Muslims) with a book of self-flattering “universal values” at the tip of their spear.
What Westerners have started to realise – 2008 began this process and the looming 2020 crisis will accentuate it – is that the neoliberal empires they cheered on always intended to come for their 99% as well. For proof just look at Greece, the Yellow Vests and the decade-long austerity self-cannibalisation of the Eurozone. There are those who believe the upcoming explosion of this critical mass will cause the revolution implied by the fall of the dollar – this article will pose an alternative view; it’s a view which Westerners cannot even conceive of much less discuss because – of course – they have no enemies, There Is No Alternative, their ideology conquered even before their armies arrived, they are so willing to die for their own rightly-guided governments… right?
Mr. Littlejohn was right to marvel at the primacy of Western/international high finance in his discussion of the enormous consequences of the recent decisions by the Fed & ECB to purchase corporate bonds.
If we care about our nation, then we must ensure corporations and individuals (and in the US corporations are now legally treated as individuals, in a major 1%er victory) are legally and fiscally subservient to not only our nation’s laws but our nation’s moral values (i.e. the spirit of the law). Capitalist-imperialist ideologies do not have this type of patriotism: their patriotism, due to a system predicated on competition and not cooperation, cannot be displayed via this positive defense but only via a very negative attacking – be it Putin, Russia, Muslims, those on the other side of the political aisle, socialists, the Iraqis, the Vietnamese, the Algerians, etc.
Mr. Littlejohn writes of the corporate debt purchases: ”This seems to allow the development of a possible strategy that discriminates against foreign-owned companies (such as Chinese-owned Huawei) to be starved of Fed funds.
Indeed it does. But nations have a right to defend themselves (like with protectionism), after all; contrarily, national aggression (like with blockades) is the cardinal sin of international law. The new Fed-Treasury open alliance, with BlackRock as their bureaucratic arm, is a problem for the American citizen in that the priority is not the elevation of American corporations/individuals, but of Western/international high finance.
This lack of patriotism is rightly offensive to the many Tyler Durdens of ZeroHedge, but because they reject socialist analysis they don’t fully understand it nor can they proffer actual solutions instead of a useless, destructive Fight Club-esque rage.
ZeroHedge: the West does not rule the whole world, try as they might
It’s important to note the very fair criticism often made of “dissidents-but-not-really” like ZeroHedge: they have been wrong for years. They keep saying that capitalism is about to collapse because just look at this excellent data we culled and this fine analysis… and yet it has not collapsed. This doesn’t make ZeroHedge permanently wrong, necessarily – it could make them ahead of the curve. Mr. Littlejohn was quite right in relying on them as he did.
I also wonder if ZeroHedge would do any better if they were put in charge of the Western economy? ZeroHedge’s editorial line is resolutely Austrian/Chicago economics. They do not publish any articles advocating socialist reforms, but they do publish many anti-socialist diatribes which may or may not be reprinted from the 1930s. Indeed, I am always flattered when they do occasionally reprint some of my geopolitical articles, and I definitely find it very amusing because many of the comments are – and this is a direct quote: “This is the worst thing I have ever read on ZeroHedge!” LOL!!! Well, they are based around socialism, not Austrian/Chicago economic brutality, selfishness and egotism. But when it comes to economics ZeroHedge is not about providing balance and objectivity – they are trying to protect their investments.
But in most newspapers the best, objective hard news about foreign countries is actually found in the business section – they need some truth because they are trying to protect their investments. ZeroHedge is indeed indispensable during this economic crisis because of their excellent taste in culling key hard business news from around the world – we can never find such contrarian-yet-factual, everything-is-not-100%-rosy, up-to-the-minute hard news at any of the Mainstream Media business sections or websites. ZeroHedge knows what to look for regarding Western economic problems and it wants them fixed – they are trying to protect their investments.
One of the favourite sources of analysis for ZeroHedge is Rabobank. Perhaps it is because they are Dutch, and their “junior partner” status in the North European strangulation of Latin Europe gives them some pause regarding the ruthlessness of the Germanic-Austrian-Chicagoan mindset? Perhaps because it is a bank based not only around cooperatives but agriculture as well that they have a very un-New York City view on the desirability of empire? Or maybe not… anyway.
As Mr. Littlejohn wrote of their “Rabbit Hole” article: “It treats the global market for Dollars under a single label, namely Eurodollars, but if one adopts that approach then it tends to downplay the historical significance of the rise of the petrodollar….” Indeed to both assertions – calling the eurodollar the “matrix behind it all” is rather magical thinking – it would be nice if the flaws of capitalism-imperialism could be entirely sourced to this one issue but, alas…. I think Mr. Littlejohn may agree with me that Every overrates the exceptionalism and risk of eurodollars. It’s very name is misleading – “globodollars” would be more accurate than “westdollars”, as socialist countries have participated. Eurodollars are a key part of offshore banking money laundering – they are not some new development – and I will discuss later how they are still, in application and spirit, dollars.
Yet the Rabobank analysis of the future of dollar dominance by Every is useful and has great merit. Here is how Every sees the possible outcomes of this QE Infinity post-corona hysteria world:
“Indeed, look at the Eurodollar logically over the long term and there are only three ways such a system can ultimately resolve itself:
  1. The US walks away from the USD reserve currency burden, as Triffin said, or others lose faith in it to stand behind the deficits it needs to run to keep USD flowing appropriately;
  2. The US Federal Reserve takes over the global financial system little by little and/or in bursts; or
  3. The global financial system fragments as the US asserts primacy over parts of it, leaving the rest to make their own arrangements.”
Thus, the first possibility is for the US to abandon dollar dominance via essentially declaring bankruptcy/refusing to pay debts.
The third possibility is for the global financial system to collapse and for the US to assert primacy over parts of it. But this idea is inherently flawed: socialist-inspired systems would NOT fragment, due to the independent, anti-capitalist, anti-Western nature of their systems.
Argue all you want about how China, Iran, Cuba, Vietnam and others would be negatively impacted by the Great Depression II, but I will argue just as long about how all their laws, governmental economic control, and a culture of interventionism will allow socialist-inspired nations to weather this storm EXACTLY as they have weathered Hot War, Cold War and Western blockades. This report for PressTV I did from Havana on “How the Cuban blockade works” opens with a rare sight in Cuba: a billboard. It reads “The blockade: the longest-running genocide in human history.” What is Great Depression 2 compared to that, at least for Cubans?
So I would not be arguing small points, indeed: Cuba exists, Iran exists, China exists – all resist. Every fatally assumes that the West and the entire globe are synonymous – they absolutely are not!
Thus, option three’s critical mistake is seemingly caused by common Western arrogance: It is not “The global financial system fragments” but the “WESTERN financial system fragments”. Again, this is not a small difference between our analyses: the West does not run the entire globe, try as they might and as self-flattering as that has been for them to insist. Here is the new, corrected option #3:
The WESTERN financial system fragments as the US asserts primacy over parts of it, leaving the rest to make their own arrangements.
The West’s incestuous 1% will maintain their primacy over the West and their most-favoured puppets, i.e. no change, except for the obvious, looming degradation of THEIR financial system.
Yet Every seems to believe some clients will perhaps slip away from the US/West – really? When he writes “leaving the rest to make their own arrangements” he is completely vague, probably because he is used to equating “the West” with “the world”: how can a nation leave the world, after all? No wonder he is vague. What Every fails to see is that any nation making “arrangements” outside of the West’s orbit can only go over to a necessarily China-focused – which is to say, a socialist-inspired bloc-focused – arrangement which is indeed already in place.
How can it not be binary in this fashion?
Is Every saying that some nations will soon adopt the 1979 slogan of the Iranian Islamic Revolution – “Neither East nor West but the Islamic Republic of Iran”? That would be quite interesting and I would cheer very loudly… but I do not expect that many nations will reclaim their sovereignty in such an emphatic fashion in 2020. Every is predicting revolutions (and many of them), which is even riskier than predicting a date for a Covid-19 vaccine.
And why should we be optimistic, when all it takes is some bribes and just a couple thousand soldiers to hold a nation’s capital, transportation hubs and sources of natural wealth (as in all over West Africa with France) – why would the Western 1% just “leave the rest” alone? That would be terrible for the capitalist bottom line: if France stops getting African uranium for peanuts then the consumer costs of their nuclear-dependent energy system will skyrocket, to give a single example among many. Thus, any nation which says to the West that they want to “make their own arrangements” will either need strong patrons (i.e., the anti-Western socialist-inspired bloc), or 1979-Iran style determination for true independence.
Anyway, no nation is a (geopolitical) island – Iran’s turn away form the West necessarily implied a turn to the East, and today they are China’s most trusted non-Oriental ally. Every, in a historical nihilist fashion, negates the existence and reality that There Is An Alternative… sorry Westerners, this IS real and is not some mere fad.
While the US (which leads the Western 1%) may say, “You want your money? Come get it,” (option 1) they will definitely not abandon neo-colonialism (option 3), which is so very, very profitable.
Thus, we appear to be stuck with option 2 – “The US Federal Reserve takes over the global financial system little by little and/or in bursts;”.
But we are not: Every is entirely mistaken to present that as some sort of new development!
The Western central banker collusion which was the “solution” to the 2008 crisis was based around following the diktat of top US bankers regarding when to issue QE and when to enact ZIRP (Zero Interest Rate Policies). Discussing this evidence that the Fed has colluded with the central banks of their allies was the basis of my 10-part series on the Western “bankocracy” from last winter, but the idea that bankers collude is not at all a new development in socialist thought.
Therefore what will happen is his third option, but accurately modified: The global Western financial system fragments, as the West asserts primacy over as many puppets/clients as possible, but the persistent economic success of the socialist-inspired camp attracts fresh allies.”
Such a development is entirely in keeping with my original article’s thesis of continued, but not endless, dollar dominance. The competition between two ideologies has never ended: the fallout from the corona hysteria may indeed bust out capitalism-imperialism but it cannot & will not cause the socialist-inspired camp to suddenly quit just as their popularity and relative strength is about to peak; just as after 2008 China peaked so high that they were able to end the (allegedly) “unipolar” world.
So where do we go from here? Answer: a slow decline for the West, which – again – is NOT the entire globe
I will keep saying it because it is true: Even if we judge via their own capitalist metrics, China, Vietnam, Iran – these countries have soared over the past four decades while the real economy of the West has been trashed. Iran only began to have postwar hardship when the inhuman Western blockade ramped up with the EU, US, UN triple sanctions of 2011. Even Cuba has had more economic growth and stability since the end of the Special Period (the fall of the USSR) than the West! ZeroHedgers will protest, “But we said not THIS capitalism (the neoliberal form)”, but it’s not like they have remained anywhere but the powerless fringe and, anyway, that is not my problem.
So a “slow decline” is imprecise journalism – it is a continued decline. Maybe a drastic plummeting in dollar dominance is indeed around the corner, but anyone in April 2020 who says they can predict the future is lying.
So what was Every’s take on the most certain scenario? We should learn it because despite its flaws, caused by its unbalanced and blinkered pro-“capitalism with Western characteristics”, it’s a very fine article.
“In other words, the BIS (Bank for International Settlements) is making clear that somebody (i.e., the Fed) must ensure that Eurodollars are made available on [a] massive scale, not just to foreign central banks, but right down global USD supply chains. As they note, there are many practical issues associated with doing that – and huge downsides if we do not do so. Yet they overlook that there are huge geopolitical problems linked to this step too.
Notably, if the Fed does so then we move rapidly towards logical end-game #2 of the three possible Eurodollar outcomes we have listed previously, where the Fed de facto takes over the global financial system. Yet if the Fed does not do so then we move towards end-game #3, a partial Eurodollar collapse.”
Again it’s a fine analysis but hobbled by the same two flaws: Every does not realise that #2 (“where the Fed de facto takes over the global financial system Western financial system”) has already happened, although it certainly must increase in order to forestall #3; and he does not realise that the Fed will NOT take over the financial systems of the “socialist-inspired bloc” with any amount of QE due to the laws, culture and modern history of said bloc. I hope it’s clear where Every goes astray and why.
This is also not my problem, but: To preserve the Western system we should assume that the long, LONG-awaited downloaning of Western QE “right down global USD supply chains” has finally come. However, it has come too late, and it has only finally arrived on top of the economic disaster which is the suicidal (for the West’s lower classes) Great Lockdown, and it will be expressly designed to be just enough downloaning to forestall mass domestic revolt yet not enough to prohibit the endless increasing of the 1%’s market concentration.
QE Infinity (barring an absurd amount of downloaning, which is politically impossible and would amount to a debt jubilee) cannot forever forestall a dollar collapse, but the “dollar demisers” falsely believe that fiscal policy/money issuance is the only tool the Western elite has. The end-of-the-dollar-revolution will not occur after, as I wrote in my first article, rounds of QE are rotated among different allies, and – as needed – massive Western propaganda campaigns, very watered-down but socialist-inspired concessions to the 99%, debt moratoriums, military distractions and maybe even World War III. Maybe even World War IV, too, and this is why I don’t exaggerate against a culture which believes deeply in their “clash of civilisations”:
The Western 1% simply cannot get “in” the socialist-inspired bloc or the yuan – after all, the aristocratic class in Iran, Cuba, China and elsewhere was totally expelled (to the West) – think they won’t make the dollar their “last stand” and use all their tools? As always, the West underrates the totalitarian nature of their most successful sons and daughters, but Iranians, Cubans and others do not. Yes, the economic scale of the crisis in 2020 is (potentially) revolutionary, but anyone who says it has already gone beyond the capacity of the Western 1% to rein it in and keep profiting… all this accuracy-driven journalist can say is, “Maybe, it’s still early.”
At the heart of Every’s argument, ZeroHedge’s complaints, Austrian/Chicagoan indignation that a national economy is indeed the same as a household, and also the West’s many “dissidents but not really” is a common theme that capitalism will implode because they cannot keep “rolling the debt over”. This is essentially echoed by Trotskyism, which holds that capitalism will eventually crumble under the weight of its own contradictions. (It is also notable that all these Westerners also think that the West – which has no enemies, which has no competition, to which no credible alternative exists – can never be defeated, only implode. More arrogance, but I have digressed.)
But they can keep rolling it over.
Again, they can keep rolling it over.
Every believes that the “eurodollar” is so very risky and exceptional because, “They (are dollars which) are not under the US’ legal jurisdiction, nor are they subject to US rules and regulations.” What he has ignored is that the high-finance holders of these dollars and markers are still very, very much informal upholders of the US-led Western system: Every has ignored culture, psychology and history in favor of a purely legal view of these eurodollars, instead of how the owners of these eurodollars operate in practice.
The Caymans, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Hong Kong and Singapore (all in the top 13 for eurodollar-dependant nations) – we should be worried that these tax havens will disobey the US and jeopardise the system? We should believe that they are even being honest about their claimed dollar reserves? We should be worried that the 1% is going to start sending their dollars to the average person instead of into these tax havens, creating a liquidity crisis? Anyone who has their money in the Caymans is certainly a parasite on society – we should worry for them, or fear them creating a “moral hazard” reckoning-implosion of the Western financial system? If all these eurodollars in the Caymans disappeared the real global economy would be fine – some rich people would be forced to get by on what’s in their Swiss bank accounts. Eurodollars are a problem – they are often the imaginary credit used by the elite who manipulate the West’s imaginary FIRE/QE economy – but there are bigger fish to fry in April 2020.
However, at root the Eurodollar system is based on using the national currency of just one country, the US, as the global reserve currency. This means the world is beholden to a currency that it cannot create as needed,” – exactly: a large percentage of these tax-haven eurodollars are hoarded, immorally stolen dollars, but they are still dollars. Again, they are not being held by the types of people who can be called “revolutionaries” or “patriots” or “moralists”, LOL – they will not be used in international warfare against the West because they are part of a truly supranational 1% Western financial system. They are held by people who are very over-leveraged, true, but these are not people whom repo men visit, eh? Again – it’s still the dollar which is in charge, and the dollar is on the 1%’s side, not America’s side.
Every’s “nationalist” view – that the Caymans are about to make a geopolitical power play – lacks the wider, better perspective provided by the socialist lens: the Western 1% can indeed collude to create more dollars as they need, and they have since 2008. This group can, “keep USD flowing out or else a global Eurodollar liquidity crisis will inevitably occur”, which Every mistakenly fears. They can indeed keep “rolling it over” via QE Infinity – the fact that QE Infinity is a term which journalists finally devised came up after years of foolish waiting for QE to end shows that the Western 1% has a very sound, but immoral, grasp on reality.
Fundamental question: Why would the West stop rolling it over?
If you ask ZeroHedge they might say – with an oxymoronic “capitalist idealism”: because we can’t reward excessive greed nor failure. LOL….
But who among the West’s high-finance 0.01% will be the class traitor who calls in the marker which implodes the system? He or she would implode his or herself, as well. The West is so big it is not just one person who can implode it, anyway: there is no single marker with a “quadrillion” after the number.
And forget mass domestic protests (which will be banned for months and months in the few Western countries which actually have a protesting culture) because whoever heard of mass protests for “reformism” (which is all Western semi-dissidents propose)? That is nonsensical – mass protests either lead to revolution or they fizzle quickly in the “can’t we all just get along”, middle-class, political status quo-ism which defines the West’s eternally anti-socialist culture.
Thus there is no saviour – individual or national – to be had – there is only long, hard opposition via socialism, which is an entirely new system that has fixed the errors of the old capitalism-imperialism system. Therefore the only entity which could cause the system to explode – if we are being pragmatic – is a bloc led by China. Only they have they weight, combined with their allies, to ever break the dollar’s dominance. But they are not going to do that next Tuesday:
They are not economically strong enough, nor are their few allies, nor do they have enough allies, nor could they be aided within a Western society which has nearly no “5th columnists” but merely “semi-dissidents” whose greatest minor achievement is to not want more war/blockades with the socialist-inspired bloc (because it could blow up the planet, negatively affect the rainforest, trigger negative emotions, disrupt the avocado-toast supply chain, etc.). Look at where we are in April 2020: it is a radical, unheard of idea to be reading of any “socialist-inspired bloc” – how can we say that China today is anywhere as omnipresent and dominant as the USSR-led bloc was in, say, 1945, ’55, ’65, ’75 or ‘85? Many of you right now are denying this idea that in 2020 there is any possible “socialist-inspired bloc” – remember that your (likely) reactionary grandfathers and grandmothers had no such illusions of their total victory.
This relative weakness, this inability to provide an alternative to dollar dominance, is why Iranians will tell you: China is not going to “save” anyone except for China, because they are not strong enough. Iran was the first non-Oriental country to learn this fact, even if some in Iran haven’t learned it yet.
However, what China will do is work with you – they will create long-term plans with you (as China and Iran have done on the Belt and Road Initiative) if you prove your socialist and anti-imperialist bonafides. They will work with you even if you are imperialist-capitalists – it is the only way to gain strength and ultimately beat them.
Every, ZeroHedge, the countless Western Rabobanks – they believed the socialist-inspired bloc had been crushed; they are incredibly upset that the 2008 Great Recession and the phony QE “solution” has permitted China to rise and have the temerity to question their neoliberal, neo-imperial, greedy “universal values”. China is indeed now a threat to the West but it is not yet what the USSR was for decades – a concrete alternative which was willing to foot your bills (the USSR was the only empire where the centre bled for the periphery) while your national culture reforms itself away from imperialist ideals in order to (don’t you get this yet?) break the grip of international high finance on your people.
Thus, the dollar will not be beaten next Tuesday.
This is why corona hysteria will ultimately be manipulated by the Western 1% to strengthen the dollar, i.e. – their dollar and not America’s dollar. Barring reforms – and I have seen none which hyper-financialisation did not take advantage of since 2008 – 2008 will only largely repeat itself.
Indeed, it would take a revolution for a Western crisis to be unsuccessfully manipulated… but “semi-dissidents”, i.e. liberal reformists, hold out that mere false hope. They don’t see – like China, Iran, Cuba and others – that the Western 1% will do, like Mario Draghi of the ECB, whatever it takes to maintain their neoliberal empire.
The proof that this analysis is correct could not be more clearly illustrated than by World War I: a war started by international high finance to forestall the victory of socialism and to defend capitalism-imperialism despite its failure for their 99%.
Mr. Littlejohn grasps these historical concepts, and their political-moral implications, far more than the rabidly capitalist ZeroHedge and their preferred analysts.
Mr. Littlejohn and the dream of Eurasia, a concept which strikes down European exceptionalism
I disagree with Mr. Littlejohn where he gives his extension of Every’s three-outcome analysis:
Even a partial Eurodollar collapse would do serious damage to those countries (more than half) which have sought emergency IMF support, and so this new power gives the Fed enormous political leverage over most major economies and over multilateral agencies such as the IMF, the World Bank or even the European Union [EU]. Given that Trump sees the EU as a potential competitor to the USA, and given the low proportion of US Dollars that its major economies have in relation to their trading needs, the EU is very vulnerable to US economic pressure in the present circumstances.”
Indeed, the developing world who are Western clients and not socialist-inspired clients will have huge problems very shortly. The impact of the Great Lockdown hysteria on the developing world is another article I have been meaning to write, but it will be an extension of Part 3 from the “bankocracy” series: QE paid for a foreign buying spree: developing countries hurt the most.
However, while Trump (who looks even riskier post-corona to the 1% free-trade globalists than he did in November 2016, when they did all the could to prevent his election and his protectionist ideas) may personally see the EU as a competitor, the many people richer than him know that this is not the case – the US and EU will continue to collude. Ergo, not only does the Fed want that “enormous political leverage” but the European 1% wants the Fed to have it, too. The dollar needs to remain in charge for the Western financial system to profitably continue for Europe’s 1% – the structure of the Eurozone was penned by the US for precisely this reason, as was the Plaza Accord for the yen. (As I wrote in the final part of a 7-part series in 2017, which socialistically examined the QE crisis in the Eurozone, “With the Plaza Accord of 1985, Japan adopted the US-orchestrated neoliberal changes that were designed to suck the surpluses from Japan back into the United States.”)
Thus the Fed’s sidelining (outspending) of the IMF and World Bank (but not the ECB, as they can print money) should be viewed as what it is – increased market concentration which will profit the Western 1%, as predicted by Marx. Every’s analysis is so unblinkered-capitalist that he likely cannot see this Eurogroup-Fed alliance, but the fine analyst Alastair Crooke alludes to it; however, Crooke still fails to use the socialist class analysis lens and instead fundamentally looks at such global political changes via a slightly-wider but still outdated nationalist lens.
Europe’s 1% may publicly gripe against the Fed’s decisions but they cannot go against them without effectively declaring war on the dollar. The US, Eurozone, Japan, and Saudi economies, plus their clients, are all intertwined – happily, for their 1%. If they did declare war on the dollar they would only have two options:
  1. Join the socialist-inspired bloc – this means renouncing capitalist-imperialist culture, and that will never happen.
  2. Europe carves out a “Third Way”, in a drastic revolution to the binary ideological system which has raged for over a century. This revolution has been so very often discussed in Europe but it has never, ever happened precisely because Europeans are so very devoted to their capitalist-imperialist culture. They have proven that they don’t want a Third Way, should one even exist. Talk of a “Third Way” has proven to be merely a way for Europeans to arrogantly assert their alleged exceptionalism/chauvinism. At some point they will give up and embrace “Eurasia”, but that is a ways away.
I think Mr. Littlejohn need not worry about “if the Euro collapses as a currency in the coming depression” – the euro, the yen and the dollar will all strengthen in a crisis because that is when investors seek safe havens and these are three of the four biggest global economies in what is soon to be an increasingly economically-depressed global market. All three also collude to fix their currencies relative to each other, due to the interconnected nature of the Western 1%, so while they will jockey for position for export power it is only within agreed-upon limits as it is as a fundamentally-united trio, and also fundamentally (as of 2008) united against the yuan, the champion currency of the socialist-inspired bloc.
So, overall, I think perhaps Mr. Littlejohn underestimates the way the euro/EU can burst free of these bonds to become a sovereign counterweight to the dollar/US, and also that Europe will embrace a culturally-unwanted idea of Eurasia anytime soon. Crooke does a good job in his article of linking the actions of the Fed with what I wrote about in Part 3 of the 2017 series, The hopelessly corrupt structure of the Eurozone & the Eurogroup. I think we simply have to look at how then-Economy Minister Emmanuel Macron organised the takeover of national giant Alstom Energy for GE in 2015 to show that Europe’s leaders will prioritise the US 1% (who are richer and thus have more influence ) than the EU’s 1%. It’s not a “new” or “slow” decline for Europe, but a “continued” decline as well.
Europe does not want sovereignty, which is a modern concept; sovereignty has become “modern” because it has been wiped out by Western-led globalisation. The neoliberal (and thus also neo-imperial) empire which is the EU does not respect sovereignty but suppresses it, as Europe is obviously NOT modern.
It’s difficult to change the matrix which modern Western commentators place the world upon – nationalism, imperialism-as-inevitable, chauvinism against non-Western cultures, existentialism (the feeling of being trapped due to not perceiving any alternative) and the historical & political nihilism which is the legacy of WWII.
It’s thus a radical, unheard of concept which still easily upends Every’s analysis – the West is NOT the entire world. New York, London, Paris and Tokyo will grow even more powerful post-corona due to even-greater wealth/market concentration, but their Greeces, “Flyover Country” and their developing world clients will continue to be bled. And as Western inequality, dominance, militarism and market concentration re-doubles amid their supranational financial system chaos, a whole other bloc is poised to not just weather the storm but thrive amid the post-corona chaos precisely because they rejected the Western legal and cultural system.
It’s not that as if these entities didn’t all collude to try and stop China’s rise – WWII was only more murderous to the Soviets, after all – it’s that they could not. It’s not as if they didn’t beg the CCP to change their laws to allow foreign control of Chinese industries – it’s that China would not. The West finally gave up because the CCP made the Western 1% too much money while still retaining control and serving the Chinese people. It’s not as if the West hasn’t tried to get Iran to go “neoliberal” (LOL) and sell off the 90% of the non-Black Market, non-carpet economy which the Iranian government controls – it’s that they could not. It’s not as if the West hasn’t tried to break Cuba, North Korea and others – it’s that they could not.
You cannot stop an idea, especially a superior idea.
My original article was aimed at the hasty, gleeful “dollar demises” and sought to, as the French say, “put some water in your wine”. The West’s “double bubble economy + Great Lockdown hysteria” crisis now is indeed enormous, but it cannot possibly ruin the socialist-inspired bloc – only themselves because that is THEIR economy, not ours.
That is a very sober – and not immoderately gleeful – analysis from the socialist-inspired bloc.
Mr. Littlejohn is on the right track and hopeful that Europe will come around – who would argue with hope in right action? I would remind Mr. Every that there IS an alternative and that it is not new. I would remind ZeroHedge that socialism does not ban competition and that socialism WILL win the binary ideological struggle, as they have been doing since 1980 (as ZeroHedge keeps pointing out via their fine documenting of the West’s continued economic failures).
I thank Mr. Littlejohn for his time, consideration and efforts.
***********************************
Corona contrarianism? How about some corona common sense? Here is my list of articles published regarding the corona crisis, and I hope you will find them useful in your leftist struggle!
Ramin Mazaheri is the chief correspondent in Paris for Press TV and has lived in France since 2009. He has been a daily newspaper reporter in the US, and has reported from Iran, Cuba, Egypt, Tunisia, South Korea and elsewhere. He is the author of the books ‘I’ll Ruin Everything You Are: Ending Western Propaganda on Red China’ and the upcoming ‘Socialism’s Ignored Success: Iranian Islamic Socialism’.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

الحريري يجمع رؤساء الحكومات: دياب غريمنا

 الجمعة 1 أيار 2020

الحريري يجمع رؤساء الحكومات: دياب  غريمنا
(أ ف ب )

من المبكر القول «مبروك للبنان». ذلك مسار طويل مليء بالمطبّات ستسير عليه الخطة المالية التي أقرّتها الحكومة أمس. لكن مع ذلك، فإن حسّان دياب ردّدها أكثر من مرة، مبدياً التفاؤل بخطة حكومته التي «تنتهي بها وعبرها مرحلة التخبّط في سياسات مالية أوصلت البلد إلى حالة الانهيار الحالية».
تلك عبارة يتحسس منها كثيرون، من مردّدي نغمة «الحكومة تسعى إلى الانتقام من الحريرية». يتجاهل هؤلاء حقيقة أن المشكلة الأولى للحكومة أنها لا تزال ترفض محاسبة من أوصل البلاد إلى ما وصلت إليه، وفي مقدمتهم الحريرية وشركاؤها. والمقصود هنا سياسات الأب والابن ومن مثّلهما في رئاسة الحكومة، ومن عاونهما ومكّنهما من تنفيذ السياسات التي أوصلت البلاد إلى ما وصلت إليه. مع ذلك، لا يتردّد رؤساء الحكومة السابقون، بالوقوف سداً منيعاً أمام محاولات نبش المغارة. صار البحث عن الأموال المسلوبة انتقاماً. وصارت الإشارة إلى فشل رياض سلامة في القيام بوظيفته انتقاماً. وصار المس بمصالح المصارف التي تسرق الناس انتقاماً. لكن أن يسارع أربعة رؤساء حكومة قادوا البلد إلى الغرق، على الأقل منذ عام ٢٠٠٥ إلى عام ٢٠٢٠، لتحميل مسؤولية الانهيار إلى خلفهم الذي لم يمض على تولّيه مسؤوليته المئة اليوم، فذلك مسموح. فات الحريري هنا أن حرده بعد تقديم استقالته في تشرين الأول الماضي، ورفضه القيام بأي إجراء من شأنه الحد من الانهيار، الذي كان يتسلل إلى جسد الدولة، يكفي لمساءلته.
خطة دياب وحكومته ليست مثالية. يسهل نقدها وانتقادها في كثير من البنود، لكن هذا لا يمكن أن يكون حقاً لمن قاد البلاد إلى الانهيار.
نجيب ميقاتي يكره الحريري والحريري يكرهه. ذلك لا يحتاج إلى دليل، لكن يجمعهما كره دياب أيضاً، الآتي من خارج النادي، الذي يضمهما إلى فؤاد السنيورة وتمام سلام. لا دور لهذا النادي سوى التحريض الطائفي والمزايدات. ميقاتي يجيد هذه اللعبة، وكذلك السنيورة. لكن الحريري، آكل حقوق مئات العائلات من موظفي مؤسسات المستقبل، فيسمح لنفسه بتقييم خلفه، وبتحديد متى يجب أن تسقط حكومته. صدّق الحريري أنه ابن انتفاضة ١٧ تشرين. لكنه أفتى أمس بأن «المتظاهرين ليسوا من جمهوري، فجمهور رفيق الحريري ما بيعتدوا وما بيكسروا وما بيدمروا». ليس هذا فحسب: «جمهورنا يعرف ما تمر به المنطقة وينتظر حتى يستطيع التغيير».
لرؤساء الحكومة السابقين أن يتّهموا من يشاؤون، لكن عليهم تسليم السنيورة إلى القضاء

ثقة الحريري بنفسه تسمح له بالافتراض أن الناس سيصدقونه، عندما يعاهدهم، مع ناديه، بأن «نبقى أمناء لقضاياهم ومشكلاتهم التي هي مشكلات وطنية لا يمكن تجاهلها ولا غض النظر عن الإساءات التي تسبب بها هذا العهد وحكومته لجمهور المواطنين ولنظام لبنان ودستوره». ماذا عن الإساءات التي سببتها حكومتا العهد الأولى والثانية برئاسة الحريري، أحد طرفي التسوية الرئاسية؟
يتذاكى الحريري عندما يدعو إلى «العودة إلى إقرار الإصلاحات الواجب اعتمادها من دون أي تأخير، بدلاً من التلهّي بحرف الانتباه عن جذور المشكلات وأسبابها الحقيقية. وبالتالي، افتعال معارك سياسية لن تؤدي إلا إلى مزيد من الاحتقان والتوتر في البلاد، وإلى تبديد الموارد وفرص الخروج من المآزق المنهالة على لبنان». لا داعي للتوقف عند التهديد الذي تتضمنه هذه العبارة، لكن لا بد من التنبه فعلاً إلى «جذور المشكلات». يحلو لرؤساء الحكومة السابقين أن يختصروا «المشكلات الحقيقية» بقطاع الكهرباء وما سبّبه من مفاقمة للدين العام. هذا جزء من الحقيقة. الكهرباء واحد من مزاريب الإنفاق التي لم يوقفها أحد. لكن تبقى الإشارة إلى جذور المأزق ناقصة، إذا لم توجه أصابع الاتهام إلى السنيورة. أول أشكال الفساد كان التلاعب وعدم التدقيق بالحسابات المالية للدولة منذ عام ١٩٩٣ حتى عام ٢٠٠٩.
يمكن لرؤساء الحكومة السابقين أن يتهموا من يشاؤون، لكن عليهم، على الأقل، تسليم السنيورة إلى القضاء، الذي يُمنع من فتح الملف من جهة، ثم تتم المطالبة باستقلاليته من جهة أخرى. ليس هذا فحسب. لمزيد من الدعم للقضاء، لا ضير في أن ترفع المرجعية الدينية الخطوط الحمر!
حكمة أمس، كانت في البند الثالث من بيان رؤساء الحكومة: التوقف عن محاولات تحويل النظام اللبناني من نظام ديموقراطي برلماني الى نظام رئاسي، كما التوقف عن ضرب صلاحيات رئاسة الحكومة وجعلها مطيّة طائعة صاغرة لأحقاد أو أطماع صغيرة لهذا أو ذاك…
يحار المرء هنا من يصدق. ميقاتي الذي لطالما اتهم الحريري بالتفريط بصلاحيات رئاسة الحكومة، أم الحريري الذي سار في تحالف ظنّه مربحاً، ليس لرئاسة الحكومة طبعاً، بل لشخصه. ثم خرج عندما لم يحقق مبتغاه، متذكراً صلاحيات المنصب وحقوق الطائفة.
في المحصلة، أعطى الحريري الفرصة لدياب، بعدما اطمأن إلى أن صندوق النقد حاضر في الخطة الحكومية. قال الحريري: «سنقرأ الخطة، وإذا كانت جيدة فسنتعاون بالعمل على إنجاحها، وإذا فشلت الحكومة فأنا طبعاً مع إسقاطها في شكل شنيع».
المهمة ثقيلة أمام الحكومة، ليس لأن الحريري يراقب عملها، بل لأن «الدولة في حالة انهيار شبه كامل، والواقع المالي يستند إلى أرقام غير واقعية، واستقرار سعر صرف الليرة اللبنانية هو وهم نعيشه ونصدّقه»، كما قال دياب عقب انتهاء جلسة مجلس الوزراء الذي أقرّ بالإجماع الخطة المالية الاقتصادية.

الحكومة تقرّ الخطة الاقتصاديةتنطلق الخطة الاقتصادية للحكومة من ضرورة البدء فوراً بتنفيذ الإصلاحات على مستوى إدارة الدولة، والسياسة المالية، والقطاع المالي، والمصرف المركزي، والحساب الجاري، وميزان المدفوعات، وهي حدّدت أهدافاً على مدى خمس سنوات، منها:
ــــ انحسار العجز في الحساب الجاري إلى 5.6 بالمئة.
ــــ الحصول على دعم مالي خارجي يفوق 10 مليارات دولار، بالإضافة إلى أموال مؤتمر سيدر.
ــــ العودة إلى النمو الإيجابي اعتباراً من عام 2022.
ــــ اعتماد الدعم المباشر وغير المباشر للفئات غير الميسورة وتنفيذ برامج اجتماعية في هذا المجال.
ــــ العودة إلى الفائض الأولي في المالية العامة في عام 2024، وهيكلة محفظة الدين السيادي وتقليص نسبة الدين العام إلى الناتج المحلي إلى ما دون 100 بالمئة.
ــــ إعادة هيكلة القطاعين المصرفي والمالي للسماح للاقتصاد بإعادة الانطلاق وتوفير فرص عمل جيدة ومستدامة.
وأشار دياب إلى أن الخطة بنيت على أسس تسمح للبنان بالحصول على الدعم الدولي المطلوب لجهة إعادة إطلاق العجلة الاقتصادية، وإعادة رسملة المصارف والمؤسسات، وتأمين شبكات الأمان الضرورية والبنى التحتية التي طال انتظارها، وذلك لإعادة إخراج معظم اللبنانيين من حالة الفقر والعوز.
وأوضح دياب أن الحكومة ستقوم بالإصلاحات الأساسية، مثل قطاع الكهرباء ونظام نهاية الخدمة وتعويض الصرف والضرائب العادلة والتصاعدية التي لا تصيب العمل والإنتاج. وسوف تحظى مسألة استعادة الأموال المنهوبة بحيّز أساسيّ من عمل الحكومة للتعويض على اللبنانيين عن الجرائم التي اقترفت بحقهم.
أما على صعيد القطاع المصرفي، فتهدف الخطة إلى حماية أموال المودعين وتقوية المصارف وإعادة هيكلتها، لكي تستطيع تأمين أموال الناس والخدمات الأساسية للاقتصاد، على أن يعيد البنك المركزي التركيز على عمله الأساسي، أي حماية الاستقرار الاقتصادي والمالي والنقدي.
باختصار، قال دياب: توجد خسائر كبيرة في النظام، ويجب أن نتعاون في تحمّلها، دولة ومصرفاً مركزياً ومصارف، لكي نعاود الانطلاق باقتصادنا في أسرع وقت. وسوف نسعى إلى امتصاص الخسائر بشكل عادل، أي من دون تحميل من لم يستفد من سياسة الماضي أية أعباء. نريد مساهمة من الفوائد الخيالية التي دفعت، ومن الذين جنوا أرباحاً من الهندسات، وأيضاً من الذين خالفوا القوانين وسرقوا المال العام.
إضافة إلى الخطة الاقتصادية، وافق مجلس الوزراء على عرض وزارة الطاقة والمياه لاستراتيجية التحوط لمصلحة مؤسسة كهرباء لبنان من مخاطر تقلبات أسعار المشتقات النفطية وتكليف وزارة المالية بتسديد كلفة الـ call options لتغطية تقلبات سعر النفط.
كما أقر مشروع قانون يرمي الى تعديل صلاحيات هيئة التحقيق الخاصة المنشأة بموجب القانون الرقم 44/2015 (مكافحة تبييض الأموال وتمويل الإرهاب)، وفق ملاحظات هيئة التشريع والاستشارات ووزارة المال.
ووافق على مرسوم يرمي إلى نقل موظفين إلى ملاك التفتيش المركزي وتعيينهم بوظيفة مفتّش معاون (فئة ثالثة) في المفتشية العامة التربوية في الملاك المذكور.
Related

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

GOLAN HEIGHTS ESCALATION AND NEW DRAMA IN IDLIB



Early on May 1, several missiles launched from the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights hit positions of the Syrian Army near Tell Ahmar and Quneitra city. The strike reportedly led to no casualties among Syrian personnel, but destroyed several pieces of military equipment.
This was the second Israeli strike on Syria in less than a week. On April 27, Israeli airstrikes hit the countryside of Damascus, including the al-Mazzeh Airport. Pro-Israeli sources claim that underground facilities of the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps were the target.
Meanwhile, a new drama is developing in the militant-held part of Greater Idlib. After briefly clashing with the Turkish Army near Nayrab, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham found themselves in the center of a new scandal.
On April 30, the group’s fighters were confronted by supporters of other radical groups in the town of Maaret Elnaasan in western Aleppo. According to pro-opposition sources, the main reason of tensions is the decision of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham to open a crossing for commercial purposes to the government-held area. This initiative faced resistance among militant groups directly controlled by Turkey. The Turkish Army even tried to block a road towards Maaret Elnaasan. However, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham militants were able to suppress the protest and the crossing was opened. The further protests that continued on May 1 forced Hayat Tahrir al-Sham to close the crossing.
Earlier in April, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham tried to open a similar commercial crossing near Saraqib, but this attempt was also blocked by Turkish-led forces.
Representatives of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham claim that the opening of such crossings is vital to contain the developing economic crisis in the militant-held area. According to them, a large part of goods produced within the militant-held area, first of all food, is being sold in the government-controlled territory.
Various fees on commercial activities and contraband traffic are among key sources of the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham budget, which has been facing difficulties amid the shirking funding from its foreign sponsors. On the other hand, the ability to fill own budget from independent sources of income allows the terrorist group to remain to a large degree independent from direct Turkish support. Thus, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham is capable of remaining a relatively independent player and the most powerful militant group in the entire Greater Idlib.
At least 4 Syrian soldiers were killed and several others were injured in an ISIS attack on the army convoy near the T3 pumping station in the province of Homs. The terrorists used an improvised explosive device to strike the bus moving within the convoy and then shelled it with machine guns.
The attack likely came in response to the intensified security efforts of the army in the Homs-Deir Ezzor desert. Just recently, government troops eliminated several ISIS militants and captured 2 vehicles belonging to the terrorist group.
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Saudi writer asks Netanyahu to ‘wipe Palestinians off the world’

Source

US Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) (L) talks with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) during a rally with fellow Democrats before voting on H.R. 1, or the People Act, on the East Steps of the US Capitol on March 08, 2019 in Washington, DC. (AFP photo)
Saudi writer Rawaf al-Saeen (Photo via Twitter)

A Saudi writer Saudi wittier has called on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “to wipe Palestinians off the world,” claiming that Palestinians are not Arabs and have no “land or cause”.
“I am ready to sleep beside a Jew, but not a Palestinian. I would host a Jew at my house but won’t let a Palestinian in my home,” Saeen said in an incendiary rant published on YouTube.
Addressing the Palestinian nation he also said, “That land is the Israeli soil… (Former Israeli prime ministers) Yitzhak Shamir, Yitzhak Rabin and Golda Meir were heroes, but Netanyahu is a coward, because he has not burned you. I do not know the reason given his possession of numerous weapons.”
Saeen also urged the Israeli prime minister to seal the border of the occupied territories in order to prevent Palestinians from immigration.
Scores of commentators later took to social media to criticize Saeen’s remarks.
The Saudi writer had earlier taken jibes at Sweden-based Palestinian cartoonist Mahmoud Abbas over a caricature of an Arab man struggling amid the global oil crisis.
“The purpose of the cartoon is to show the oil crisis and its impact on the Arab world and the Middle East region – as it relies heavily on oil as a primary source of income,” Abbas later told Middle East Eye online news outlet.
He maintained that his cartoon was not about Saudis.
Moreover, the new television series “Umm Haroun” produced by the London-based Saudi-owned Middle East Broadcasting Company (MBC) has provoked a storm in the Arab world, with critics regarding the drama as an invitation to normalize ties with Israel.
Palestinian Hamas resistance movement denounced the TV series as a “political and cultural attempt to introduce the Zionist project to Persian Gulf society.”
Related

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!