False Semites
By Robert Thompson
Nov 14, 2008, 13:23
http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/article_28759.shtml
Adolf Hitler swallowed whole the silly theory that there exists a Jewish race, propounded by men such as the German Wilhelm Marr and the Hungarian Theodor Herzl. This led him and his followers to work closely with the Zionists to 'persuade' all the Jews in Germany to leave, after having been robbed of all their possessions, to go to join in the 'settlement' of Palestine then under British Empire mandate from the League of Nations. The British Empire took Palestine as part of its claim to have a right to control its (the words used were "zones of influence") 'share' (the southern part) of what had been, under the Ottoman Empire, greater Syria, while France took the northern part and divided it into the present-day Syria and the Lebanon.
Over the years, this close working relationship between the Nazis and the Zionists grew stronger, as the British authorities made pathetic attempts to limit the flow of Ashkenazim into Palestine, and one of the men involved was the late Adolf Eichmann, whom the Zionists later decided to kill off to prevent him from telling the full tale of how the Zionists came to fight the British in Palestine at a time when they were fighting the Nazi war machine elsewhere. Mr Eichmann must have expected to be able to live in peace, and have been shocked to have his former allies turn on him, and put him to death after a Soviet-style show trial.
Facts can spoil a true story, and no-one is more aware of this than the Zionists, so they have since pretended that their efforts to hamper the British war effort never occurred.
There were three leading Zionist terrorist organisations, Irgun Zvai Leumi, the Stern Gang and Haganah, and since 1948 the two former were absorbed by Haganah to form the Zionist armed forces which now terrorise the whole of the Near and Middle East.
It is interesting to note that the father of Mr Obama's choice as right-hand man, Mr Rahm Emanuel, was a member of the Irgun Zvai Leumi, and thus fought on behalf of the Nazis against the British administration in Palestine.
What Marr, Herzl and Hitler overlooked was that their use of the expression "anti-semite" was false. Around the Mediterranean and also towards the east, Jewish missionaries had been converting people of any and every race to Judaism, and there were strong and lively Jewish communities in all the major seaports of Europe and North Africa as well as eastwards and southwards on the route to India. This was before the birth of Jesus, and had nothing to do with any dispersion of people within the Roman Empire.
Much later, other Jewish missionaries went northwards and managed to convert certain tribes in the Caucasus, who found this highly convenient to avoid coming under the rule either of the supposedly Christian Byzantine Empire or of the Muslim Caliphate. These people used Hebrew as their liturgical language, and they created the Talmud unknown for centuries to other Jews, but their Aryan language added many words from the Hebrew to become what we now know as Yiddish. These Yiddish-speaking people migrated north and west to settle in the lands which stretch from what is now Russia to the Germanic speaking territories now known as the Netherlands, the Moselle, Alsace and Switzerland. They thus had no historic biological link with the inhabitants of the Holy Land as known to the twelve tribes and once forming the kingdoms of Israel and Judah, but they had the same respect for Jerusalem as the Holy City as did the Sephardic Jews from the south and west, and also Christians and Muslim.
In order to make their claim to invade the Holy Land seem respectable, the Zionists decided to change from using the Aryan Yiddish as their major means of communication in favour of a modernised version of the semitic Hebrew, which was invented almost from scratch, but used ancient Hebrew as its foundation.
The Zionists have managed to persuade large numbers of people, particularly in the United States, that they are the biological heirs to the ancient people of Israel, and that they are therefore entitled to effect ethnic cleansing of the genuine descendants of the ancient people who have converted either to Christianity or Islam, and to replace them with Ashkenazim brought in from all around the world. This cruel aim has had unfailing support from successive régimes ruling the United States, and now appears to benefit from the fullest backing from Mr Obama, who does not seem to care that innocent men, women and children are suffering persecution intended to make them abandon their right to live in their own historic homes and lands. I personally refuse to accept that laws which discriminate against persons on the grounds of their supposed religion or race can be considered 'democratic' in the word's modern sense, and the oppressed, as in the Holy Land, have no chance to live in freedom. These false semites should be forced by the "International Community" (whatever that may be) to comply with every United Nations Resolution to give back their rights to the Palestinian people.
So sorry, but time for yet another reality-check:
ReplyDeleteGENETIC EVIDENCE LINKS JEWS TO THEIR ANCIENT TRIBE
Genetic evidence continues to provide additional proof to the claims that the Jewish people are descended from a common ancient Israelite father: Despite being separated for over 1,000 years, Sephardi Jews of North African origin are genetically indistinguishable from their brethren from Iraq, according to The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
They also proved that Sephardi Jews are very close genetically to the Jews of Kurdistan, and only slight differences exist between these two groups and Ashkenazi Jews from Europe.
And see this one from the prestigious Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America:
JEWISH AND MIDDLE EASTERN NON-JEWISH POPULATIONS SHARE A COMMON POOL OF Y-CHROMOSOME BIALLELIC HAPLOTYPES
...The results support the hypothesis that the paternal gene pools of Jewish communities from Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East descended from a common Middle Eastern ancestral population, and suggest that most Jewish communities have remained relatively isolated from neighboring non-Jewish communities during and after the Diaspora....
Evidence for Common Jewish Origins. ...Several lines of evidence support the hypothesis that Diaspora Jews from Europe, Northwest Africa, and the Near East resemble each other more closely than they resemble their non-Jewish neighbors.... First, six of the seven Jewish populations analyzed here formed a relatively tight cluster in the MDS analysis...
Second, despite their high degree of geographic dispersion, Jewish populations from Europe, North Africa, and the Near East were less diverged genetically from each other than any other group of populations in this study (Table 2). The statistically significant correlation between genetic and geographic distances in our non-Jewish populations from Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa is suggestive of spatial differentiation, whereas the lack of such a correlation for Jewish populations is more compatible with a model of recent dispersal and subsequent isolation during and after the Diaspora...
In summary, the combined results suggest that a major portion of NRY biallelic diversity present in most of the contemporary Jewish communities surveyed here traces to a common Middle Eastern source population several thousand years ago. The implication is that this source population included a large number of distinct paternal and maternal lineages, reflecting genetic variation established in the Middle East at that time. In turn, this source diversity has been maintained within Jewish communities, despite numerous migrations during the Diaspora and long-term residence as isolated subpopulations in numerous geographic locations outside of the Middle East.
And we also see it from the The Cohen Modal Haplotype (CMH) and the 1997 study published in Nature Magazine (also one of the leading scientific journals):
“Y Chromosomes of Jewish Priests” (Nature Volume 385 2 January 1997)
Silly fools.
I brought scientific studies and Michael brings a brain fart.
ReplyDeleteLOL!
Sceintific studies indeed, you are an idiot.
ReplyDeleteOnly 15% of Israeli jews are semitic, that's a fact if you know what that means.
Israel deliberately forgets its history
http://mondediplo.com/2008/09/07israel
An Israeli historian suggests the diaspora was the consequence, not of the expulsion of the Hebrews from Palestine, but of proselytising across north Africa, southern Europe and the Middle East
By Schlomo Sand
Every Israeli knows that he or she is the direct and exclusive descendant of a Jewish people which has existed since it received the Torah (1) in Sinai. According to this myth, the Jews escaped from Egypt and settled in the Promised Land, where they built the glorious kingdom of David and Solomon, which subsequently split into the kingdoms of Judah and Israel. They experienced two exiles: after the destruction of the first temple, in the 6th century BC, and of the second temple, in 70 AD.
Two thousand years of wandering brought the Jews to Yemen, Morocco, Spain, Germany, Poland and deep into Russia. But, the story goes, they always managed to preserve blood links between their scattered communities. Their uniqueness was never compromised.
At the end of the 19th century conditions began to favour their return to their ancient homeland. If it had not been for the Nazi genocide, millions of Jews would have fulfilled the dream of 20 centuries and repopulated Eretz Israel, the biblical land of Israel. Palestine, a virgin land, had been waiting for its original inhabitants to return and awaken it. It belonged to the Jews, rather than to an Arab minority that had no history and had arrived there by chance. The wars in which the wandering people reconquered their land were just; the violent opposition of the local population was criminal.
This interpretation of Jewish history was developed as talented, imaginative historians built on surviving fragments of Jewish and Christian religious memory to construct a continuous genealogy for the Jewish people. Judaism’s abundant historiography encompasses many different approaches.
But none have ever questioned the basic concepts developed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Discoveries that might threaten this picture of a linear past were marginalised. The national imperative rejected any contradiction of or deviation from the dominant story. University departments exclusively devoted to “the history of the Jewish people”, as distinct from those teaching what is known in Israel as general history, made a significant contribution to this selective vision. The debate on what constitutes Jewishness has obvious legal implications, but historians ignored it: as far as they are concerned, any descendant of the people forced into exile 2,000 years ago is a Jew.
Nor did these official investigators of the past join the controversy provoked by the “new historians” from the late 1980s. Most of the limited number of participants in this public debate were from other disciplines or non-academic circles: sociologists, orientalists, linguists, geographers, political scientists, literary academics and archaeologists developed new perspectives on the Jewish and Zionist past. Departments of Jewish history remained defensive and conservative, basing themselves on received ideas. While there have been few significant developments in national history over the past 60 years (a situation unlikely to change in the short term), the facts that have emerged face any honest historian with fundamental questions.
Founding myths shaken
Is the Bible a historical text? Writing during the early half of the 19th century, the first modern Jewish historians, such as Isaak Markus Jost (1793-1860) and Leopold Zunz (1794-1886), did not think so. They regarded the Old Testament as a theological work reflecting the beliefs of Jewish religious communities after the destruction of the first temple. It was not until the second half of the century that Heinrich Graetz (1817-91) and others developed a “national” vision of the Bible and transformed Abraham’s journey to Canaan, the flight from Egypt and the united kingdom of David and Solomon into an authentic national past. By constant repetition, Zionist historians have subsequently turned these Biblical “truths” into the basis of national education.
But during the 1980s an earthquake shook these founding myths. The discoveries made by the “new archaeology” discredited a great exodus in the 13th century BC. Moses could not have led the Hebrews out of Egypt into the Promised Land, for the good reason that the latter was Egyptian territory at the time. And there is no trace of either a slave revolt against the pharaonic empire or of a sudden conquest of Canaan by outsiders.
Nor is there any trace or memory of the magnificent kingdom of David and Solomon. Recent discoveries point to the existence, at the time, of two small kingdoms: Israel, the more powerful, and Judah, the future Judea. The general population of Judah did not go into 6th century BC exile: only its political and intellectual elite were forced to settle in Babylon. This decisive encounter with Persian religion gave birth to Jewish monotheism.
Then there is the question of the exile of 70 AD. There has been no real research into this turning point in Jewish history, the cause of the diaspora. And for a simple reason: the Romans never exiled any nation from anywhere on the eastern seaboard of the Mediterranean. Apart from enslaved prisoners, the population of Judea continued to live on their lands, even after the destruction of the second temple. Some converted to Christianity in the 4th century, while the majority embraced Islam during the 7th century Arab conquest.
Most Zionist thinkers were aware of this: Yitzhak Ben Zvi, later president of Israel, and David Ben Gurion, its first prime minister, accepted it as late as 1929, the year of the great Palestinian revolt. Both stated on several occasions that the peasants of Palestine were the descendants of the inhabitants of ancient Judea (2).
Proselytising zeal
But if there was no exile after 70 AD, where did all the Jews who have populated the Mediterranean since antiquity come from? The smokescreen of national historiography hides an astonishing reality. From the Maccabean revolt of the mid-2nd century BC to the Bar Kokhba revolt of the 2nd century AD, Judaism was the most actively proselytising religion. The Judeo-Hellenic Hasmoneans forcibly converted the Idumeans of southern Judea and the Itureans of Galilee and incorporated them into the people of Israel. Judaism spread across the Middle East and round the Mediterranean. The 1st century AD saw the emergence in modern Kurdistan of the Jewish kingdom of Adiabene, just one of many that converted.
The writings of Flavius Josephus are not the only evidence of the proselytising zeal of the Jews. Horace, Seneca, Juvenal and Tacitus were among the Roman writers who feared it. The Mishnah and the Talmud (3) authorised conversion, even if the wise men of the Talmudic tradition expressed reservations in the face of the mounting pressure from Christianity.
Although the early 4th century triumph of Christianity did not mark the end of Jewish expansion, it relegated Jewish proselytism to the margins of the Christian cultural world. During the 5th century, in modern Yemen, a vigorous Jewish kingdom emerged in Himyar, whose descendants preserved their faith through the Islamic conquest and down to the present day. Arab chronicles tell of the existence, during the 7th century, of Judaised Berber tribes; and at the end of the century the legendary Jewish queen Dihya contested the Arab advance into northwest Africa. Jewish Berbers participated in the conquest of the Iberian peninsula and helped establish the unique symbiosis between Jews and Muslims that characterised Hispano-Arabic culture.
The most significant mass conversion occurred in the 8th century, in the massive Khazar kingdom between the Black and Caspian seas. The expansion of Judaism from the Caucasus into modern Ukraine created a multiplicity of communities, many of which retreated from the 13th century Mongol invasions into eastern Europe. There, with Jews from the Slavic lands to the south and from what is now modern Germany, they formed the basis of Yiddish culture (4).
Prism of Zionism
Until about 1960 the complex origins of the Jewish people were more or less reluctantly acknowledged by Zionist historiography. But thereafter they were marginalised and finally erased from Israeli public memory. The Israeli forces who seized Jerusalem in 1967 believed themselves to be the direct descendents of the mythic kingdom of David rather than – God forbid – of Berber warriors or Khazar horsemen. The Jews claimed to constitute a specific ethnic group that had returned to Jerusalem, its capital, from 2,000 years of exile and wandering.
This monolithic, linear edifice is supposed to be supported by biology as well as history. Since the 1970s supposedly scientific research, carried out in Israel, has desperately striven to demonstrate that Jews throughout the world are closely genetically related.
Research into the origins of populations now constitutes a legitimate and popular field in molecular biology and the male Y chromosome has been accorded honoured status in the frenzied search for the unique origin of the “chosen people”. The problem is that this historical fantasy has come to underpin the politics of identity of the state of Israel. By validating an essentialist, ethnocentric definition of Judaism it encourages a segregation that separates Jews from non-Jews – whether Arabs, Russian immigrants or foreign workers.
Sixty years after its foundation, Israel refuses to accept that it should exist for the sake of its citizens. For almost a quarter of the population, who are not regarded as Jews, this is not their state legally. At the same time, Israel presents itself as the homeland of Jews throughout the world, even if these are no longer persecuted refugees, but the full and equal citizens of other countries.
A global ethnocracy invokes the myth of the eternal nation, reconstituted on the land of its ancestors, to justify internal discrimination against its own citizens. It will remain difficult to imagine a new Jewish history while the prism of Zionism continues to fragment everything into an ethnocentric spectrum. But Jews worldwide have always tended to form religious communities, usually by conversion; they cannot be said to share an ethnicity derived from a unique origin and displaced over 20 centuries of wandering.
The development of historiography and the evolution of modernity were consequences of the invention of the nation state, which preoccupied millions during the 19th and 20th centuries. The new millennium has seen these dreams begin to shatter.
And more and more academics are analysing, dissecting and deconstructing the great national stories, especially the myths of common origin so dear to chroniclers of the past.
Shlomo Sand is professor of history at Tel Aviv university and the author of Comment le people juif fut inventé (Fayard, Paris, 2008)
Gee that's fascinating. Unfortnately for you, Jewish history is too well-documented,and the DNA studies only confirm what we all know.
ReplyDelete