Zionism, since founded said: "GOODBYE TO PEACE"
You know that "Peace" has never been on the zionist table, and it you who warned that "the zionists threaten the world to take it down with them if they go down".
On the table we have Samson option, and the only option to save the world peace, is to kill the Zionist beast.
In a previous article you aked: Do most Israelis and many other Jews NEED to feel persecuted?
You concluded: "Yes, Jews (most of them) do need to feel persecuted."
You told your readers how your jewish accountant. and your "best friend in the world, for more than 40 years", who after meeting "Mother Israel refused to believe you "saying that the war in 1967 was a war of Israeli aggression, because if he do “everything crumbles”
I would say everything crumbling now.
The "Sons of Mother Israel", who learned from their mother to deny the existance of Palestinians, are frightened by the change of the tide, the truth that "Israel was created, mainly, by Zionist terrorism and ethnic cleansing", the hard realities of demography and the international efforts to De-legitimize Israel.
Therefore, using your words, "it’s hard to see what Barack Obama or anyone else can do to move the Israelis toward a just peace, one that would be acceptable to the vast majority of Palestinians"
Obama, in his complete surrender to Zionism, thinks he would save America from going down with Israel, putting Palestinians, Arabs, and Muslims, between two bitter options, complete surrender to Zionism, or War. Obama to UN: More Blood Will Be Shed if Peace Talks Fail
"It should be clear to all that efforts to chip away at Israel’s legitimacy will only be met by the unshakeable opposition of the United States...... "
Yes Alan, Obama may bribe and bully the discredited Palestinian Authority (Actually the bribe started in Oslo) into accepting crumbs from Zionism’s table, and he hopes that such acceptance may provoke a Palestinian civil war on the long way to close the Palestine file.
You asked: Could that be what Zionism really wants, in order to have a pretext for completing the ethnic cleansing of Palestine?
Abbas – ‘The double agent’ in his meeting with Leaders of American Jewish Community expressed his understanding of Israel’s security concerns, " the security of Israel is our security" Abbas said.
In response to a question about Hamas, Abbas said, “we have a problem with Hamas. Leave this problem to us. Let us focus on the final agreement between us and the Israelis and after that we will handle this issue internally.”
In my opinion, the effotrs to egage Hamas under the slogan of Palestinian reconciliation, (Quartet conditions) has lead and shall lead to nowhere. The palestinian stage in Jerusalem and West bank is ripe for a third Intifada against the Palestinian Authority's security apparatus created "to serve and protect the occupier and relieve the Israeli army as much as possible of the burden of occupation".
In my view the most appropriate response to Obama from the Palestinians, Arabs, Muslims, and Humanity would be: Kill the BEAST.
Lessons of resistance from southern Lebanon
*******************************************
ALAN HART: OBAMA SPEAKS AT THE UN….GOODBYE TO PEACE
24. Sep, 2010 On marks out of ten for his speech to the UN on the subject of ending the conflict in and over Palestine that became Israel, I’d give President Obama minus five.
“After 60 years in the community of nations, Israel’s existence must not be a subject for debate,” Obama proclaimed. “It should be clear to all that efforts to chip away at Israel’s legitimacy will only be met by the unshakeable opposition of the United States.”
The question is – WHICH Israel must not have its existence debated?
Israel inside its borders as they were on the eve of the 1967 war or the greater Israel of today? That’s not a question Obama is prepared to ask let alone answer.
In my view the most appropriate response to Obama from the Arab and wider Muslim would be something this: All American presidents who refuse to demand (with the promise of sanctions if necessary) that Israel end its occupation of all Arab land grabbed in 1967 will only be met by the unshakeable opposition of all Arabs and other Muslims everywhere.
We now know what Obama himself expects of those Arabs who “count themselves as friends of the Palestinians”. They “must seize the opportunity for a peace agreement that will lead to a Palestinian state.” They can do that, Obama added, “by supporting the Palestinian Authority financially and politically and by coming to terms with Israel’s existence.”
Again the question – the existence of WHICH Israel must the Arabs come to terms with?
To Obama I say, “Mr. President, until you are prepared to answer this question, you will have no credibility whatsoever in the Arab and wider Muslim world, at least far as ‘the street’ (the masses) is concerned.”
Obama’s notion that there is an opportunity for a peace agreement to be seized can only be the product of desperate and deluded wishful thinking on his part unless he believes that he can bribe and bully the discredited Palestinian Authority into accepting crumbs from Zionism’s table. It’s not totally impossible that he might be able to do so, but that would only provoke a Palestinian civil war.
Could that be what Zionism really wants, in order to have a pretext for completing the ethnic cleansing of Palestine?
Perhaps most depressing of all was Obama’s statement about the need for an independent Palestinian state. It is required, he said, to provide Israel with “true security”. No mention of it being needed to go some way to righting the terrible wrong done to the Palestinians in Zionism’s name.
We know the answer. Nothing.
Uprooted Palestinian
No comments:
Post a Comment