On Alan Hart and naked Hypocrisy

In his latest article, with the headline:  Hypocrisy at its most naked, Alan Hart, in his opening paragraph, criticized Russia and China’s veto of the UN Security Council resolution which condemned Syria over its "brutal crackdown on anti-government protesters". I don't expect MR. Linkman, to tell his readers who are the so-called anti-government protesters, and what's their real agenda.

Alan Mocked Susan Rice, who "will cast the U.S. veto to kill the Palestinians’ bid for Security Council recognition of their statehood (if the bid gets to the Security Council)", for saying:

"The United States is outraged that this council has utterly failed to address an urgent moral challenge and a growing threat to regional peace and security"

But he claimed the UN Security Council resolution against syria "contained a weak reference to the possibility of sanctions against Damascus". Therefore, Russia and China’s Veto reflects "short-term, short-sighted, political self-interest of leaders and their governments."  

Again, no surprise, I don't expect Mr. Linkman to say the Veto reflect the Long-term, strategic Russia and China’s interests, in fighting the USA, without shotting a single bullet, that losing, what Mr. Linkman called "Bashar al-Assad’s monster regime", means removal of the corner stone of the axis of resistance, and pave a new way, for another Big Bang (USRAEL NEW MIDDLE EAST) after the failure of July's war Big Bang.

Back to Alan's claim that the Russia and China’s veto of the UN Security Council "is, of course, the same Susan Rice who will cast the U.S. veto to kill the Palestinians’ bid for Security Council recognition of their statehood (if the bid gets to the Security Council)".

"It is apparently of no concern to her and her master that the Security Council has utterly failed, time and time again, to address the criminal policies of the Zionist (not Jewish) state of Israel, policies which present a far more urgent moral challenge and growing threat to regional peace and security than what Bashar al-Assad’s monster regime is doing in Syria." he added,

He avoided telling his readers what "Bashar al-Assad’s monster regime is doing in Syria." and how it threaten the regional peace and security?. Therefore, I have to read between the lines.

Syria, as Ahmad Jibreel said from Tahran few days ago, was the the Palestininan resistance's safe haven.

Syria was "Father" Palestine's base since early 60's, almost ten years before Hafez Assad, from Syria he shot his first bullet, and paved the way to 1967 defeat. After, Black September, "Father Palestine" returned to Hafez Assad's Syria, and after his Lebanon's adventure, and Mr. Linkman's "little peace conspiracy" Arafat dropped his gun and moved to Tunis, while all other resistance factions moved north and east to continue their armed resistance.  

In hosting the Resistance Leaders, supporting the resistance in Iraq, Lebanon and Palestine the Syrian "Monster" foiled Mr. Linkman's "little peace conspiracy", and still threatening the new "Big Bang" (the new "Father" Palestine's bid.)

Commenting on professor Shlomo Avineri, most recent article is in Ha’aretz: No realistic chance of permanent Middle East peace.

"In his speech to the UN General Assembly, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas once again made a common Palestinian mistake: a Palestinian leader does not have to persuade the nations of the world, but rather the Israelis. A Palestinian state will arise only if the Palestinians convince the Israelis that they are indeed ready to live in peace and mutual recognition." Shlomo Avineri

Alan wrote: "In theory that makes a lot of sense, but it ignores the fact that most Israeli Jews have been brainwashed by Zionist propaganda and, as a consequence, need to feel threatened, need to believe they are the victims and not the oppressors."

I am not surprised with Mr. Harts, even after  Gilad Atzemon's Bombshell: "The Wandering Who", is insisting that the problem is Zionism and it's propaganda brainwashing most Israeli Jews, not in Jewishness, not in Jewish culture and identity.

Alan put it another way, "most Israeli Jews do not want to believe that the Palestinians (the vast majority of them) have long been ready for peace on terms which any rational government and people in Israel would have accepted with relief."

I will put it a third way, Mr. Linkman, it's not mine, there is no peace in Jewish Language , Shalom means security for Jews and Jews only, thus said Gilad Atzemon, I would add that explain why Rabin was assassinated and the rise of Likud, "who do not want to believe that the Palestinians" (not the vast majority of them, Mr. Linkman, unless you consider the uprooted Palestinians in Diaspora and within their own land are not Palestinians) "have long been ready for peace on terms which any rational government and people in Israel would have accepted with relief.", instead of accepting "Shalom" terms they assassinated Rabin, and killed his OSLO.

Finally Mr. Linkman concluded "That being so, there isn’t a snowball’s chance in hell of peace unless and until an American president has the freedom and the courage to use his leverage to compel Israel to end its occupation of all Arab land grabbed in 1967."

I Put it this way: That being so, there isn’t a snowball’s chance in hell of "regional peace and security unless the Zionist Monster is killed the occupied Zionized western countries are liberated, and Palestine is liberated from river to sea.

In case you missed it: "All vows, oaths, promises, engagements, and swearing,......"

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian