Unconfirmed “leaked” documents indicate Washington-approved, Qatari-funded
false flag attack using Libyan chemical weapons in Homs, Syria.
The e-mail reads:
Image: Libyan Mahdi al-Harati of the US State Department, United Nations, and the UK Home Office (page 5, .pdf)-listed terrorist organization, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), addressing fellow terrorists in Syria. Harati is now commanding a Libyan brigade operating inside of Syria attempting to destroy the Syrian government and subjugate the Syrian population. Traditionally, this is known as “foreign invasion.”
It cannot be said for certain whether the e-mail allegedly sent by Britam is genuine, but the West is openly subverting Syria through the funding and arming of terrorists from across the Arab World. Terrorists are confirmed to be moving through NATO-member Turkey, with the Turkish government’s explicit assistance. Heavy weapons are both being supplied and paid for by the West, and likewise brought across Syria’s borders through NATO-member Turkey.
Despite this, the momentum of NATO’s armed, proxy-aggression toward Syria has been broken multiple times. Threats of a no-fly zone are waning as NATO’s proxies are neutralized with little left to establish a no-fly zone over. The fear now for NATO and its various partners across the region, from Israel to Erdogan in Turkey, to Qatar and Saudi Arabia, is that there will be nothing left of the so-called “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) to intervene on behalf of.
With time running out and the Syrian people still stalwartly defending their nation, it is possible that the desperate measures described in the alleged e-mail from Britam have been considered – as the rhetorical groundwork to accommodate such measures has already been long-ago laid out by the complicit Western media. The purpose of exposing this alleged e-mail is not necessarily to accuse Britam, but to remind readers to be vigilant. And should “chemical weapons” be used in Syria in an apparent joint Syrian-Russian operation, Britam, the United Kingdom, and Qatar should be the first suspects that come to mind.
‘Syria militants possess chemical weapons’
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
Documents
allegedly “hacked” belonging to UK-based defense contractor Britam (official website here) appear
to show the company considering an offer from Qatar to use Libyan chemical
weapons in Homs, Syria in order to frame both the Syrian and Russian
governments. The plan involves using Britam’s Ukrainian mercenaries and
Soviet-era chemical weapon shells brought in from Libya’s large, Al
Qaeda-linked, Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) controlled arsenals.|
Phil
We’ve got a new offer. It’s about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington.
We’ll have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin g-shell from Libya similar to those that Assad should have. They want us to deploy our Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and make a video record.
Frankly, I don’t think it’s a good idea but the sums proposed are enormous. Your opinion?
Kind regards
David
It should be remembered
that this is not confirmed – and there is most likely no way that it can ever be
confirmed. However, in light of recent,
and continuous attempts by the Israelis and NATO to justify a military
intervention in Syria based on fears of “chemical weapons,” and considering how
a nearly decade-long war and occupation was fought in neighboring Iraq under
similar and patently false pretenses, every potential piece of evidence
should be taken seriously.
It should also be
remembered that during the Iraq War, British special forces were caught carrying
out false flag attacks, dressed as sectarian extremists in Basra, Iraq, and
shooting at Iraqi policemen. After the British soldiers were arrested, the
British army attacked the police station they were being held at to free
them. The precedence of Western nations using false flag operations, including
terrorism, to achieve geopolitical objectives beyond their borders most
certainly exists.
The Libyan Connection
Mention of acquiring
chemical weapons from Libya is particularly troubling. Libya’s arsenal had
fallen into the hands of sectarian extremists with NATO assistance in 2011 in
the culmination of efforts to overthrow the North African nation . Since then,
Libya’s militants led by commanders of Al
Qaeda’s Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) have armed sectarian extremists
across the Arab World, from as
far West as Mali, to as far East as Syria.
In addition to small arms,
heavier weapons are also making their way through this extensive network. The
Washington Post in their article, “Libyan
missiles on the loose,” reported:
“Two former CIA counterterrorism officers told me last week that technicians recently refurbished 800 of these man-portable air-defense systems (known as MANPADS) — some for an African jihadist group called Boko Haram that is often seen as an ally of al-Qaeda — for possible use against commercial jets flying into Niger, Chad and perhaps Nigeria.”
While undoubtedly these
weapons are also headed to Niger, Chad, and perhaps Nigeria, they are veritably
headed to Syria. Libyan LIFG terrorists are
confirmed to be flooding into Syria from Libya. In November 2011, the
Telegraph in their article, “Leading
Libyan Islamist met Free Syrian Army opposition group,” would report:
Abdulhakim Belhadj, head of the Tripoli Military Council and the former leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, “met with Free Syrian Army leaders in Istanbul and on the border with Turkey,” said a military official working with Mr Belhadj. “Mustafa Abdul Jalil (the interim Libyan president) sent him there.”
Another Telegraph article,
“Libya’s
new rulers offer weapons to Syrian rebels,” would admit
Syrian rebels held secret talks with Libya’s new authorities on Friday, aiming to secure weapons and money for their insurgency against President Bashar al-Assad’s regime, The Daily Telegraph has learned.
At the meeting, which was held in Istanbul and included Turkish officials, the Syrians requested “assistance” from the Libyan representatives and were offered arms, and potentially volunteers.
“There is something being planned to send weapons and even Libyan fighters to Syria,” said a Libyan source, speaking on condition of anonymity. “There is a military intervention on the way. Within a few weeks you will see.”
Later that month, some
600 Libyan terrorists would be reported to have entered Syria to begin
combat operations and
have been flooding into the country ever since.
Image: Libyan Mahdi al-Harati of the US State Department, United Nations, and the UK Home Office (page 5, .pdf)-listed terrorist organization, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), addressing fellow terrorists in Syria. Harati is now commanding a Libyan brigade operating inside of Syria attempting to destroy the Syrian government and subjugate the Syrian population. Traditionally, this is known as “foreign invasion.”
Washington Post’s reported
“loose missiles” in Libya are now turning up on the battlefield in Syria. While
outfits like the Guardian, in their article “Arms and the
Manpads: Syrian rebels get anti-aircraft missiles,” are reporting the
missiles as being deployed across Syria, they have attempted to downplay any
connection to Libya’s looted arsenal and the Al Qaeda terrorists that have
imported them. In contrast, Times has published open admissions from terrorists
themselves admitting they are receiving heavy weapons including surface-to-air
missiles from Libya.
In Time’s article, “Libya’s
Fighters Export Their Revolution to Syria,” it is reported:
Some Syrians are more frank about the assistance the Libyans are providing. “They have heavier weapons than we do,” notes Firas Tamim, who has traveled in rebel-controlled areas to keep tabs on foreign fighters. “They brought these weapons to Syria, and they are being used on the front lines.” Among the arms Tamim has seen are Russian-made surface-to-air missiles, known as the SAM 7.
Libyan fighters largely brush off questions about weapon transfers, but in December they claimed they were doing just that. “We are in the process of collecting arms in Libya,” a Libyan fighter in Syria told the French daily Le Figaro. “Once this is done, we will have to find a way to bring them here.”
Clearly NATO intervention
in Libya has left a vast, devastating arsenal in the hands of sectarian
extremists, led by US State
Department, United Nations,
and the UK
Home Office (page 5, .pdf)-listed terrorist organization LIFG, that is now
exporting these weapons and militants to NATO’s other front in Syria. It is
confirmed that both Libyan terrorists and weapons are crossing the
Turkish-Syrian border, with NATO assistance, and it is now clear that heavy
weapons, including anti-aircraft weapons have crossed the border too.
The Guardian reported in
their November 2011 article, “Libyan
chemical weapons stockpiles intact, say inspectors,” that:
Libya’s stockpiles of mustard gas and chemicals used to make weapons are intact and were not stolen during the uprising that toppled Muammar Gaddafi, weapons inspectors have said.But also reported that:
The abandonment or disappearance of some Gaddafi-era weapons has prompted concerns that such firepower could erode regional security if it falls into the hands of Islamist militants or rebels active in north Africa. Some fear they could be used by Gaddafi loyalists to spread instability in Libya.
Last month Human Rights Watch urged Libya’s ruling national transitional council to take action over large numbers of heavy weapons, including surface-to-air missiles, it said were lying unguarded more than two months after Gaddafi was overthrown.
On Wednesday the UN secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, said the UN would send experts to Libya to help ensure nuclear material and chemical weapons did not fall into the wrong hands.
And while inspectors claim
that Libya’s chemical weapons are in the “government’s” hands and not
“extremists’,” it is clear by the
Libyan government’s own admission, that they themselves are involved in
sending fighters and weapons into Syria.
Bottom LineIt cannot be said for certain whether the e-mail allegedly sent by Britam is genuine, but the West is openly subverting Syria through the funding and arming of terrorists from across the Arab World. Terrorists are confirmed to be moving through NATO-member Turkey, with the Turkish government’s explicit assistance. Heavy weapons are both being supplied and paid for by the West, and likewise brought across Syria’s borders through NATO-member Turkey.
Despite this, the momentum of NATO’s armed, proxy-aggression toward Syria has been broken multiple times. Threats of a no-fly zone are waning as NATO’s proxies are neutralized with little left to establish a no-fly zone over. The fear now for NATO and its various partners across the region, from Israel to Erdogan in Turkey, to Qatar and Saudi Arabia, is that there will be nothing left of the so-called “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) to intervene on behalf of.
With time running out and the Syrian people still stalwartly defending their nation, it is possible that the desperate measures described in the alleged e-mail from Britam have been considered – as the rhetorical groundwork to accommodate such measures has already been long-ago laid out by the complicit Western media. The purpose of exposing this alleged e-mail is not necessarily to accuse Britam, but to remind readers to be vigilant. And should “chemical weapons” be used in Syria in an apparent joint Syrian-Russian operation, Britam, the United Kingdom, and Qatar should be the first suspects that come to mind.
‘Syria militants possess chemical weapons’
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!
No comments:
Post a Comment