George Galloway MP to British Prime Minister David
Cameron:
What is the difference between the jihadists in Mali we oppose and the jihadists in Syria we back?
Response to David
Cameron
Bradford West MP George Galloway responded to Prime
Minister David Cameron's refusal to answer a parliamentary question, by
resorting to a cheap insult, by detailing the Arab tyrannies and puppet
presidents Britain backs.
'I asked a reasonable question, to detail the
difference between the jihadists in Mali we oppose and the jihadists in Syria we
back and in response to a legitimate inquiry I received a sneering insult more
fitted to the gutters of Eton than the Mother of all Parliaments,' Galloway
said. 'Britain is guilty to backing the worst, most bloodthirsty dictators in
the world, bar none. This country backs and arms the foul Saudi Arabian
sheikhdom which has the least democracy and probably the worst human rights
record on the planet.
Then there's Bahrain. And what about Egypt
where this government backed Mubarak until almost the end? And it is less than a
week ago, isn't it, that the Foreign Office was warning British citizens to get
out of Benghazi immediately for fear of their lives - at risk from the same
jihadis we supplied, armed and fought for.'
Galloway added: 'I have
written to the Prime Minister today about his response to me and I will be
interested how he responds.'
Below is the text of the
letter:
Wednesday 30th January 2012
Dear Prime
Minister,
I'm sure on reflection you will realise that your answer to me
today was beneath you and unbecoming for a British Prime Minister. I will deal
with the complete absence of a substantive reply in a moment. But let me deal
first with the vulgar abuse.
I do not support any Arab dictatorship,
unlike you. It is you who is selling weapons to the dictatorship in Saudi Arabia
and providing military training there. It is you who is supporting the Bahraini
dictatorship. It is you who supported the Mubarak dictatorship until its last
hours. Ditto the late dictatorship in Tunisia, Yemen etc. It is you who has the
warmest possible relations with the dictatorships in the Gulf. I could go on,
believe me. I, on the other hand, have spoken, written and broadcast against all
Arab dictatorships. Perhaps your staff, in preparing your reply, will provide
you with the evidence of this. I also read Frankenstein until the end.
I
told one of your predecessors, Lady Thatcher, on the eve of the triumph of those
whom your party routinely described as 'Afghan freedom fighters' that she "had
opened the gates to the barbarians.... And that a long dark night would now
descend upon the people of Afghanistan". I warned repeatedly against the folly
of the creation of the Arab-Afghan force which became Al Qaida. Immediately
after 9/11 I said in the House that "I despise Osama Bin Laden, the medieval
obscurantist savage. The difference is that I have always despised him. I
despised him when you (pointing at the Tory benches) were giving him guns and
money".
I find it genuinely inexplicable that you are doing it all over
again. This is a tragedy which begins to look farcical when one considers the
issue which I raised today with you.
We are now killing Al Qaida in Mali and
helping Al Qaida kill in Syria - killing Christians, killing Shiites, killing
Kurds, killing Druze, killing Sunnis who won't join their jihad, and soon, trust
me, they will be killing each other.
There may be "key differences"
between Al Qaida in Mali and their counterparts in Syria. I asked you to explain
these to the House today. You refused. But it is a question which will not go
away before a puff of vulgar abuse.
I look forward to your reply. I am
seeking to publish this letter.
Yours sincerely,
George Galloway
MP
Wednesday, 30 January 2013
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!
No comments:
Post a Comment