On July 29, in an interview with UK Channel 4, former Israeli ambassador to Washington, Michael Oren, called Gaza-ruling Islamic resistance: “a vicious, medieval, racist, genocidal organization”. One has to excuse Oren for his rubbish Talmudic belief.
The truth of the matter is Hamas has always successfully resisted world’s fourth most powerful and brutal army based on it moral superiority. While Washington and most of European capitals have designated Hamas as a “terrorist organization”, it has won the hearts of the public around the world by showing their condemnation of the Zionist entity through mass protests in almost every 193 world nation-states including the Zionist-occupied western nations.
It has been proven again and again, that when it comes to Israel’s interests, there is no “Left”. Last month, the US Senate voted unanimously to “defend Israel” against Hamas. The Senators who pledged their “moral loyalty” to a foreign state, included the “only senator belonging to the Left”, Sen. Bernie Sanders (Jewish).
“Once isolated and with their backs against the wall, the Palestinians prevailed militarily, politically, strategically, diplomatically and most important, spiritually. The reason? With your back to the wall and a gun to your face, it is pretty difficult to bend over,” says Israeli-born British author Gilad Atzmon.
On September 30, 2009, James Gundun, an investigative journalist and editor ofThe Trench, posted a warning to Barack Obama, saying that Israel cannot defeat Islamic resistance Hamas.
“Herein lie President Obama’s choices. He can continue to let Israel act unilaterally and with impunity in the West Bank and Gaza – and risk a Third Intifada. He can continue to let Israel dominate the peace process and control who America negotiates with – and risk a Third Intifada. The path least headed towards a Third Intifada is objective handling of Israel and engagement with Hamas, ironic as that may seem to America. 2010 could catapult Hamas back into the West Bank and the peace process, at which point exclusion will no longer be possible,” wrote Gundun.
On August 1, 2014, investigative journalist, Alcibiades Bilzerian, posted an article, entitled Hamas May Be the Most Moral “Terrorist” in History. Personally, I would give that honor to Lebanese Islamic Resistance Hizbullah. Watch a video below.
“One man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist. In the United States and European Union, the distinction between terrorist and freedom fighter depends on the amount of political donations your allies give. Israel lobbyists in America and Europe have provided hundreds of millions of dollars to ensure that Hamas is known to the world as a terrorist organization. Israel, on the other hand, is considered an upstanding member of the international community (contrary to all the facts of course). Instead of getting bogged down in an examination of Hamas’ historical fight to end Israeli occupation,let’s compare the behavior of Hamas and the colonial apartheid regime of Israel during this latest war to determine which side is truly the terrorist organization,” Bilzarian said. Read the answers here.
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!