Search This Blog

Loading...

Monday, March 5, 2012

Israeli Knesset member: Syria opposition desires ‘peace with Israel’

Israeli opposition lawmaker Isaac Herzog said today that factions in the Syrian uprising seek peace with his country, according to The Associated Press.

Herzog, son of the late former president Chaim Herzog and a member of the Labor Party serving in Israel’s Knesset, said he had been in contact with the Syrian opposition but there was no immediate confirmation from its members.

The AP said Herzog, a member of the Knesset committee on Foreign Affairs and Defense, had said today that the Syrian opposition want to “be friends” with Israel and called for Israel to provide them medical assistance but not weapons. The news agency said he refused to name his interlocutors to protect them from retribution by the Syrian regime but claimed they were allies of the main rebel factions.

More from GlobalPost: Ehud Barak: Israel to put an end to lopsided prisoner swaps
Like its predecessor under Hafez al-Assad, the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is a bitter enemy of Jerusalem, has fought wars against the Jewish State and sponsors organizations which attack Israel and Israelis.
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Canadian professor debunks USrael lies about Iran

Last month, Professor Dr. Michael Keefer (University of Guelph), writer and author of book, entitled, ‘Anti-Semitism: Real and Imagined’ gave a speech at the Bloor Street United Church in Toronto. The topic of his speech was ‘From Media Lies to Hot Wars’. Watch the speech video below.

Michael Keefer is a welknown activist against anti-Semitism, however, he believes that hate propaganda against Islam and Muslim is also anti-Semitism (there are far more semite Muslims than Jews). His brilliant article on ‘Anti-Semitism in Canada’, in which he reminds Canadian how the Mackenzie King government rejected Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany during the 1930s, destruction of a Montréal-area synagogue during Sabbath service and signs posted in front of many stores and restaurants reading “No Jews or Dogs Allowed” in Montral, Toronto and Calgary.

Dr. Michael Keefer refuted the usual USraeli claim that Iranian President called for the disappearance of Israel from map – even though Benji Netanyahu threatened for the wipe off Lebanon from map only last month. Keefer claimed that Israel and its proxies in the US are edging the US toward a war of aggression against Islamic Republic that would openly be genocidal. He claimed that the mainstream media and western and Israeli government officials have been using deception to stir-up war fever. He also claimed that economic and political instabilities make new wars in the Middle East very attempting for both US and Israeli elites.

The Zionist-controlled mainstream media is recycling some of the lies it propagated in 2002-03 to whip-up support for US attack on Iraq which did not pose a threat to the US, but Israel declared it as “existential threat”. Why? Because Saddam Hussein had non-existent nuclear bombs and was bent on bringing a new Jewish holocaust. Now, the media and Israeli leaders have change “Q” in Iraq to “N” – despite the fact that US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta and Israeli intelligence officials have said, as recently as January 2012, that Iran doesn’t have nuclear weapons.

“Leon Panetta said: ‘Are they trying to develop nuclear weapons? No, but we know they’re trying to develop a nuclear capability and that’s what concerns us.’ PBS News correspondent Margaret Warner edited her statement leaving out the first part of his statement (where he said they weren’t trying to develop nuclear weapons),” said Keefer.

In Canada, Foreign Minister John Baird constantly repeating the soundbite “Iran is the greatest threat to peace and security in the world,” buttressed by Prime Minister Harper making similar comments, helps instill the message that war with Iran is necessary for our very survival,” wrote Scott Stockdale in the Canadian Charger.


River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Declaring Al-Quds the Capital of Palestine, Arabs and Muslims in Beirut

Batoul Wehbe

Al-Quds forum participantsSupporting the Resistance in Palestine Committee organized a forum on Al-Quds (Jerusalem) in Resalat Hall, Beirut on Sunday in the presence of political parties and national factions from Lebanon and Palestine.

Speeches at the forum, under the title “Declaration of Al-Quds as the capital of Palestine, the Arabs and Muslims,” stressed the importance of Al-Quds as the inevitable capital of Palestine in the face of Zionist aggressions and schemes to Judaize it.

The Al-Quds forum began with the singing of the Lebanese and the Palestinian anthems followed by a speech delivered by Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah in which he warned against the Israeli enemy’s attempts to declare Al-Quds as the capital of the Jewish people, indicating that regional changes demonstrate the near achievement of Al-Quds liberation.


Palestinians Strong with Your Solidarity

Archbishop Atallah HannaHead of the Orthodox Church Archbishop Atallah Hanna, in turn, hailed Sayyed Nasrallah's stances and told the participants in the forum that Palestinians are "strong with your solidarity with us because you are entrusted to the issue of Al-Quds as the cause of the Muslims, Christians and Arabs since it is the holy city which hosts the most important holy sites in Islam and Christianity.”
“Our holy city is going through tragic circumstances since its occupation in 1984 through the weakening of the Palestinian and Arab presence and violation of Al Aqsa Mosque and other sanctities, however, these attempts are doomed to fail,” Archbishop Hanna said in a live video link from Al-Quds stressing the importance of unity among Muslims and Christians for the sake of Al-Quds’ liberation.

Jaafari Mufti Ahmad QabalanLebanon Victories Role Model to Palestine

In turn, Lebanese Jaafari Mufti Sheikh Ahmed Qabalan said in his speech during the ceremony that “after the victory of Islamic revolution in Iran, the first action Imam Khomeini did towards Al-Quds was establishing the resistance.” “With the May (2000) and July (2006) victories, triumph had turned to be exemplar in Al-Quds,” Sheikh Qbalan said, stressing “the necessity of activating the Palestinian armed resistance through cooperation between the factions and resistance forces.”


Zionists’ Desecration of Al-Aqsa a Slap to Arab Revolts
Islamic Jihad Representative in Lebanon Abu Imad RifaiFor his part, Palestinian Islamic Jihad representative in Lebanon noted that the battle for Al-Quds is a civilization one between a ‘Berberic approach’ that wants to control people and erase their civilizations and loot their sacred site through wars and settlements and another ‘liberation approach’ based on jihad and resistance. “Zionists’ attempts to storm Al-Aqsa in the view of Arab revolts are a slap in the face of these revolutions, especially in Egypt,” Abu Imad Rifai pointed out, wondering where are the ‘Arab League’ and the ‘Organization of Islamic Action’. He indicated that the policy of negotiations lost Palestinians 75% of the land of the West Bank and encouraged Israelis to try to Judaize Al-Quds.

Muslims Ought to Face the Cancerous Tumor (Israel)

Iranian Ambassador in Lebanon Ghadanfar RoknabadiSpeaking during the forum, Iranian ambassador in Lebanon Ghadanfar Roknabadi assured that Palestine will not remain under occupation. “They accuse Iran of beating the drums of war and facing peace projects. We ask them What peace do you mean? With Israel? We announced from the beginning that we do not recognize this entity,” Roknabadi said. The Iranian ambassador called upon all Muslims to unite and stand together to face this ‘cancerous tumor’ which Imam Khomeini said must be wiped off the map.

Battle for Al-Quds in Our Favor

Hamas Representative in Lebanon Ali BarakahHamas movement representative in Lebanon Ali Barakah warned that Al-Quds and the holy Islamic and Christian sites are in danger today because of Israeli practices, pointing out the next battle will be for the benefit of Muslims. “How would we enter Al-Aqsa mosque, is it through negotiations and compromises?”
Barakah wondered stressing that the only way is to destroy all that was built by the usurper entity by struggle and war. “The battle to liberate Al-Quds is coming and is finished” in the favor of Palestinians.
Source: Al-Manar Website

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Richard Foyer: ‘Israel-Firster to anti-Zionist regime’

Richard Foyer is American Jewish writer and former Zionist supporter of Israel. He is author of recent book ‘Breakthrough’. In the book, Richard, records the evil policies of the Zionist regime in the Middle East for years and also analyzes why and how the Zionist government of Israel and their supporters in the US create fear against the Palestinians to gain support. Until a few years ago, he was blind supporter of Israel. He had believed that Israel was right in invading Lebanon in 2006 and Gaza in 2008-09. The two Israeli invasions resulted in killing more than 2,500 civlians, creating over one million refugees and destroying infrastrucures in both countries.

Born into a Zionist Jewish family, Richard Foyer was a diehard supporter of the Zionist regime. He grew-up with the beliefs that Jews have biblical rights to the Holy Land (Palestine) and Israel is world’s only safe heaven for the Jews. He also believed that Arab countries bordering Israel were bent on driving Jews to the Sea.

Richard Foyer, who was once member of the Israel Lobby (AIPAC) – is now one of the strongest voices of anti-Zionism in the US. Though, Richard Foyer still believes in the Zionist narrative of Holocaust (‘Six Million Died’) – he believes that Zionists have been exploting the Jewish tragedy by calling opponents of Israeli policies, “Holocaust denier” or “Hitler”. Israel’s first prime minister, David Ben Gurion, started this exploitation by calling Egyptian President Gamal Abdul Nasser, “Hitler” and blamed him for pursuing a second Holocaust. These days, Zionist leaders are accusing Iranian people and their leaders for the same crimes.

According to Richard Foyer, the way to achieve peace in the Middle East is to convince people who think Israel can do no wrong to take a hard look at the facts, to convince them to learn what happened during the bloody formation of Israel, to make them see what is still happening to the Palestinian people today, you might want to know what makes a Zionist tick.

Last year, Richard Foyer was interviewed by the Press TV (watch video below). In the interview, Richard tells the story of how he himself went from being a diehard supporter of Israel, from someone raised in a Reform Jewish household who saw Israel as that plucky little democracy trying to provide a secure home for the long-beleaguered Jews to someone who now supports the Palestinians in their struggle for justice, he provides us with an inside look into the mind of a Zionist — his own — and how being confronted with the more grim reality changed his mind and the reality of the Palestinian struggle.

He says during his visit to Occupied Palestine, he never faced Jewish-hatred from the native Muslim and Christian Palestinians – even when he told them that he is an American Jew and Israeli (dual) citizen. He was told that the root of the Israel-Palestine conflict is not religion but Zionism.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Is the Angry Arab an Anti-Racist Racist?

DateSunday, March 4, 2012 at 2:19PM AuthorGilad Atzmon

Deliberation's Editor

http://www.deliberation.info/
We have noticed that As’ad Abu Khalil AKA Angry Arab is critical of our writer Gilad Atzmon whom he labels as an anti Semite and a racist.
Angry Abu Khalil failed to substantiate his accusations against Atzmon. Needless to say we also have never found a single anti-semitic or racist argument or statement in Atzmon’s writings.”
antiracist_racistIn the last few days, to our great surprise, we became aware that Angry Abu Khalil is constantly engaged in racially driven theories and his terminology is openly racist. Khalil refers to and interprets people according to the colors of their skin. He is clearly obsessed with White Men and White Europeans . The Angry Abu Khalil web site is saturated with racist remarks and biologically determinist statements. For instance in his blog post White Man and Paul Newman Angry Abu Khalil writes “the White Man is not a racial category–or it is not merely a racial category but also a political and epistemological category.” Not only Angry Arab agrees that ‘White Man’ is partially a racial category, he even goes as far as linking skin color with political stand and epistemology. The meaning of it is clear. Angry Arab is a racist and a biological determinist. It is more than likely that when Abu Khalil accuses Atzmon for being a ‘racist’ he actually projects from within himself.

For some peculiar reason Angry Abu Khalil portrays himself as an anti-racist. The truth of the matter is more unfortunate. Like his Anti Zionist Zionists (AZZ) allies, Angry Arab is an Anti-Racist Racist (ARR). It is far from surprising that like his Marxist Jewish allies, Abu Khalil was critical of Mearsheimer’s and Walt’s study of the Israeli Lobby. ARR Abu Khalil is basically a racist Zionist collaborator. He is a Sabbath Goy.

The following is an open letter to Angry Abu Khalil by Palestinian activist Sami Ibrahem.

LETTER TO AN ANGRY ARAB

Dear As’ad Abu Khalil

I am writing this letter as a comment on your speech in Birmingham University February 2012.In your speech you refereed to the occupier power in Iraq,Afghanistan and Palestine as a white man i feel this is racist and offensive language against all white people. As you know yourself a lot of white people joined the struggle in south Africa against the Apartheid regime. Recently I’ve noticed you posted on your blog an attack on Mr Gilad Atzmon and I quote:
” People have been asking me about him a lot as of late: in the UK and the US. I make it very clear: this is somebody that we should reject from the pro-Palestinian advocacy movement. He is anti-Jewish and his offensive language against Jews and Judaism should be categorically rejected. I would put the name of Israel Shamir in the same category. Anti-Semites belong to the Zionist side, and not to our side. “ Posted by As’ad Abu Khalil 28.February 2012.

Surely you have no right to dictate to us on the pro- Palestinian advocacy movement especially after you failed to present any evidence for your alleged accusation. Secondly you started your quote ‘people have been asking me about him a lot’ and my question to you why people would ask you about Mr Atzmon ?

Dear Mr Abu Khalil can I remind you of a quote by the Nazi minister of Enlightenment Joseph Goebbels in regard to spreading lies and propaganda about other.

” There comes a time when you just have to shake your head in amazement”. Joseph Goebbels, the Minister of Enlightenment and Propaganda for Adolph Hitler, and acknowledged as one of the most brilliant propagandists in history was correct when he said…

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

Today we see Goebbel’s doctrine repeated by The Angry Abu Khalil a man of no professional integrity.

Yours Sincerely
Sammi Ibrahem
GiladAdd The wandering who- Gilad Atzmon
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Breaking the Chains of Arrogance



I have just finished reading the heartfelt plea of Paul Eisen inviting his fellow Jews to abandon their "supremacist inclinations" (which I content is a result of long-term ideological indoctrination with concepts such "chosen-ness" in which 67% of "Israeli" Jews believe ) and to embark on a journey of self-reflection, and to ask themselves some tough questions for once, rather than continuing to blame the entire world and accusing the entire humanity of harbouring intrinsic, inexplicable and incurable feelings of "hatred towards Jews", which erupts randomly and violently around the globe for no particular reason.



Eisen's genuine plea inspired me to myself to rethink and reflect.

It has been said that we are not bodies with souls, but rather souls which are given physical bodies temporarily, through which we can come to learn and expand if we choose to.

We make our journeys through life independently yet our paths cross, and our experiences are interconnected by communication, exchange of feelings, actions, reactions and interactions.

All our options remain open, if we comprehend the simple reality of our humble existence: we humans (Jews or non) are NOT the "masters of the universe", we are NOT Gods, neither are we "Gods in the making" for that matter, and from this elementary perspective, our human reality appears humble.

So, by simply accepting that viewpoints appear different when approached from different angles, and by keeping our hearts and minds open to the fallibility and the limitation of our own singular conclusions, then our various understanding of the same information is facilitated, better comprehension emerges when viewed from different sides. Thus correct, just and innovative path toward understanding the mysterious "other", and towards the realization of infantility of ideas like superiority of self or inferiority of "others" become self-evident, which in turn enables us to explore ways of solving discord without the "need" to destroy the "other".

Accepting the fact that we stand on equal footing in our quest for answers, and that non of us has more claim to truth than the other by virtue of "birth", and as we climb up the mountain of self discovery leaving our ego behind, we learn to see multiple perspectives , we grow spiritually and our horizon expands. By realizing how microscopic, thus vulnerable we are in relation to the infinite, and by accepting the relativity of our perspective and the deficiency of our restricted paradigm, we come to our senses and allow the very feelings of modesty and humbleness which are basic prerequisites for individual compassion and the emergence of sustainable, cohesive societies

However, IF we choose NOT to take that inner path of self-discovery, self-check and self-realization, if we deprive ourselves the ability to see the others' view point, we restrict our views into a one-point linear-perspective, which in turn results in a stunted growth condition.

As it has been emphasized by many insightful prophets and inspired teachers, arrogance is one of the most poisonous traits in human character. It is one of the most dangerous obstacles that blocks our ability to learn and expand.

An arrogant soul, person or group would struggle to accept that there might be a perspective that differs from his/ her own, thus their ability to learn is significantly reduced, so they keep doing the same mistakes over and over and over again... quite sad really, when we think about it.

Unfortunately, no one can help people with such attitude except themselves, because their overgrown ego and their uncontrollable arrogance would always stand in the way, separating them from the rest of humanity. By their refusal to accept the multiplicity of perspectives, they fail to comprehend that outside their own little bubble things might be viewed differently. So when an exchange of opinions occurs or when they are invited to do some self-reflection, instead of appreciating the sincerity of heart in which the advice is given, they perceive such differences of opinion and criticism as an existential threat.

The problem remains, as long as arrogance is kept unchecked, or fostered to become a prominent feature in our souls, we won't be able to accept the concept of the fallibility of our opinion, the vulnerability of our existence, the limitation of our comprehension and the imperfection of our beings.Therefore, self-reflection and looking at the self with a critical eye becomes almost an impossibility, which in turn disables us from learning and spiraling upwards, and like a child who keeps putting his finger in the fire and getting burned each time, and as long as we fail to make the link between acts and consequences, we would get stuck in a never-ending perpetual vicious circle of mistakes and pain, and so it goes . . .

The problem remains as long as arrogance is kept unchecked, or even fostered to become a prominent feature in our souls, thus rendering us incapable to accept the concept of the fallibility of our opinion, the vulnerability of our existence, the limitation of our comprehension and the imperfection of our beings. Therefore, critical introspection rendered impossible, we remain incapable to learn and to spiral upwards, and remain like a child who keeps putting his finger in the fire and getting burned each time. Whomever fails ore refuses to recognize the direct link between acts and consequences, is stuck in a never-ending perpetual vicious circle of mistakes, destruction, and pain... and so it goes .


Putin returns to presidency after election victory

Russia elections
Russian leader Vladimir Putin on Sunday reclaimed the Kremlin in a crushing presidential election victory that he declared was honest but the opposition said was undermined by serial violations.
Putin was on course for a first round election knockout with over 60 percent of the vote, initial results showed, with his main rival the Communist Party chief Gennady Zyuganov a distant second.

In a late night appearance before over 100,000 supporters outside the Kremlin, Putin declared that he had won a clean fight and said Russian voters had sabotaged attempts to break up the country.

"We have won in an open and honest battle," Putin said with tears in his eyes and his voice hoarse with emotion, standing on a stage alongside outgoing outgoing President Dmitry Medvedev on Manezh Square.

"I promised you we would win, we won. Glory to Russia!" Putin said, adding that voters had defeated provocations that aimed "to break up the Russian state and to usurp power."
The supporters filled the square, spilling over into the streets, waving Russian flags and chanting "Putin, Putin!"

But the Russian strongman also faces an emboldened protest movement against his rule which was not represented by any single candidate in the elections but had succeeded in holding three massive rallies over the last three months.

Putin will now in May formally reclaim the Kremlin post he occupied for two terms from 2000-2008 after his four-year stint as prime minister under the presidency of his protege Medvedev.
(Reuters)

Russians Vote for President, Putin Poised to Win
Local Editor
Russians are voting on Sunday to elect a president for the fifth time in the nation’s post-Soviet history, with Prime Minister Vladimir Putin bidding to return to the Kremlin for a third term.

Four other candidates, Communist leader Gennady Zyuganov, nationalist Liberal Democratic Party head Vladimir Zhirinovsky, A Just Russia Party leader Sergei Mironov and the only independent, billionaire Mikhail Prokhorov - are also running in the March 4 vote. Putin, 59, who was Russia's president from 2000 to 2008 and has been prime minister since then, has led the race.

Putin's victory was not in doubt in voting from the Pacific coast to western borders with the European Union, and from the Arctic north to the frontier with China.

The man credited by many Russians with rebuilding the country's strong image and overseeing an economic boom in his 2000-08 presidency hoped to win outright in the first round and portray this as a strong mandate for six more years in power, Reuters said. Early signs were that turnout would be high. Officials said more almost 48 percent of voters had cast their ballots by 3 p.m. Moscow time (1100 GMT), more than at this stage in the 2008 vote that elected Putin's ally, Dmitry Medvedev, to the Kremlin.

"I think the elections will be legitimate, fair, and Putin will win in the first round, unless the court rules otherwise," Putin's spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, was shown saying confidently on Internet and cable television channel TV Dozhd.

Opinion polls showed Putin, who has remained Russia's dominant leader despite stepping aside in 2008 because he was barred from a third straight term by the law, would win 59 to 66 percent of the vote, enough to avoid a second-round runoff.
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Republican ‘Holocaust denier’ for Congress

Vietnam War veteran, Arthur Jones, 64, from Lyons (Illinois) is seeking Republican Party ticket to run for the 3rd Congressional District of Illinois against Israel-Firster Rep. Dr. Daniel William Lipinski (D). Dan Lipinski is anti-Castro, Anti-Qaddafi and anti-Ahmadinejad.

Israel Hasbara machine has come into full gears to demonize Arthur Jones as he doesn’t belive in Jewish Holocaust and is against American military attacks against Iran to please Israel. According to Arthur Jones’ campaign website, he is against US wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as new US military adventures in other countries.

Arthur Jones’ problem with the Zionist Jews goes back to 1976 when he challenged then Zionist Mayor Henry Mair (died 1994) and lost. Since then, he had dropped from the local political arena. When asked what made him return to politics now – he said mainly due to Lipinski’s strange affiliation with Israel Lobby (AIPAC).

AIPAC was bragging on their website how (Lipinski) is ‘spearheading’ the effort in the House of Representatives with a Jewish congressman from Virginia named Frank Wolf,” Jones said. “The two are spearheading an effort in the House to get tough with Iran, including closing off any oil exports to China that could lead to World War III.”

These war-mongering fools in congress like Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney – we can’t let Iran have one nuclear weapon but we let Israel have all the nuclear weapons they want,” Jones said. “This is ridiculous.”

Arthur Jones, like Mel Gibson’s father, also believes the Holocaust never happened.
As far as I’m concerned, the Holocaust is nothing more than an international extortion racket by the Jews,” Jones said. “It’s the blackest lie in history. Millions of dollars are being made by Jews telling this tale of woe and misfortune in books, movies, plays and TV. The more survivors, the more lies that are told.”
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Palestine solidarity movement on the defensive as AGM votes for zionist formulations

DateSunday, March 4, 2012 at 6:01AM AuthorGilad Atzmon
GiladAdd The wandering who- Gilad Atzmon

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Sayyed Nasrallah: Arabs, Muslims, Christians All Entitled to Defend al-Quds

Nour Rida
 
Hizbullah Secretary General His Eminence Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah inaugurated the Forum entitled "Declaration of al-Quds as the capital of Palestine, the Arabs and Muslims," which took place in Resalat hall in Beirut on Sunday.

Following the recitation of verses of the Holy Quran, and the singing of the Lebanese and Palestinian National Anthems, Hizbullah Secretary General appeared via video link to deliver his word on this event.

Sayyed Nasrallah, at the beginning of his speech, noted that "The cause of al-Quds with all its different aspects remains to be a unique cause to all Muslims and Christians worldwide, as it is the holy land that brings all monotheistic religions together, and holds within its folds the sanctities of Muslims and Christians embodied in al-Quds holy mosque and the Holy Sepulture."


"Israeli" Theft of al-Quds

Sayyed Nasrallah stressing the necessity of defending al-Quds, pointed out that this holy city has been under occupation since decades and has been declared by the Zionist usurping entity as the capital of its manmade artificial entity it calls "Israel"; he also pointed out that the Zionist entity studies a draft-law in the Knesset to declare the holy city of Muslims and Christians as the capital to the Jewish People.

His Eminence added that the region has been divided in Sykes-Picot agreement [the secret agreement that took place in 1916 for the dismemberment of the region back then] in order to take control of al-Quds, and that other schemes to divide the region have come to light, the last of which was the New Middle East Scheme that was foiled by the resistance movements.

Sayyed Nasrallah emphasized that al-Quds is the heart of the region, "Tell me where al-Quds is, I tell you where the region would be," he said. His Eminence went on to say "al-Quds is subject to judaization and desecration by the settlers, and its original [Palestinian] people have been exiled and displaced so that al-Quds becomes of a one 'known' color."

Defending al-Quds Our Duty

Sayyed Nasrallah then underscored the duty of each and every Arab, Muslim, and Christian towards the holy land that has been taken up by the "Israeli" occupier since 1948.

"We are before a unique reality in al-Quds. Each and every Palestinian, Arab, Muslim, and Christian holds national, ethical and religious responsibility before this holy city, before its future, identity, and fate," Sayyed Nasrallah said, stressing that "we all believe in judgment's day, and we will all be asked in the hereafter what have we done for the sake of liberating al-Quds since the time it was occupied."

Defending Islamic and Christian sanctities in al-Quds as well as confronting the attempts of Judaizing this holy city through a well-studied and calculated project is our duty, also serious effort and work is required, Sayyed Nasrallah assured.



As for the so-called negotiations concerning retrieving al-Quds as the Palestinian capital, Sayyed Nasrallah explained that such a choice is not realistic, especially that the "Israelis" consider al-Quds as their ultimate capital and in light of the Western and American support to the state of "Israel" and its security, which was described by the US president Barack Obama as ‘sacred' a few days ago.

Sayyed Nasrallah criticized leaders in the region, as none of them had voiced opposition to Obama's stance. [Reiterating his continuous support for the Zionist entity, US President Barack Obama described Thursday his US support for "Israel" as "sacrosanct". During a re-election campaign fundraiser in New York, Obama stated that he wanted "Israel" to maintain its military superiority as he prepares to meet with "Israeli" Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.]

Sayyed Nasrallah, hence, reiterated that the only remaining choice is resistance, especially that there have been major changes in the region and the world, which indicate the liberation of al-Quds has become even closer. One of the indications, Hizbullah leader noted, is the steadfast of the Palestinian peoples throughout the past years despite
all the violations that took place against them. He reiterated that the Palestinian cause has been alive all the way until this day.

Liberation of al-Quds Near

Hizbullah Secretary General said there are important elements that play a major role in the struggle of liberating al-Quds, including the toppling of the Shah regime in the Islamic Republic of Iran, which ultimately supports the Palestinian righteous cause, the declaration of leader of the Islamic Revolution His Eminence Imam Ali Khamenei the last Friday of every Month of Ramadan as "al-Quds" Day, the accomplishments of the resistance in Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq, also the dramatic change that took place in Egypt and Iraq.

Furthermore, Sayyed Nasrallah also said that among the important elements of winning this struggle is the weakness of the United States and "Israel", also the failure of the settlement and normalization project, as well as readiness of the people to adopt the choice of resistance as they have proved throughout the past years. "All these are factors that imply the liberation of al-Quds has become so near," Sayyed Nasrallah assured. On this note, Sayyed Nasrallah hailed the Islamic republic of Iran for the role it has been playing in supporting the Palestinian cause as it has been a role model in supporting and backing just causes of the Arabs and Muslims.

Hizbullah Secretary General said also that forty years have already passed to the beginning of the Zionist occupation of this Holy land, and now comes the beginning of its end. He stressed that from the very womb of suffering and major challenges, new generations that believe in jihad [struggle] came to light.

His Eminence noted that the first signs of liberation were the South Lebanon 2000 liberation, following the July 2006 victory in Lebanon and then the "Israeli" assault on the Gaza Strip that reaped only failure. Again, Sayyed Nasrallah reiterated that the era of victories has arrived while that of defeats has come to an end.

Source: moqawama.org

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

The Atzmon Defamation League (ADL)

By Gilad Atzmon
Atzmon_defamation_LeagueAt the bottom of that page you will find the current and most updated list of individuals who believe that the Palestinian solidarity movement should operate as a Stalinist synagogue. The Atzmon Defamation League is a list of a few Tribal Marxists and one angry Arab collaborator who added their name to an open declaration. They all agree that Atzmon should be silenced.

Amidst the success of my latest book The Wandering Who and my current USA coast to coast tour, the Atzmon Defamation league is in a state of a panic. They have a good reason: my very simple message spreads very fast, and it questions — If Israel defines itself as the Jewish State and its tanks are decorated with Jewish symbols, then aren’t we entitled to ask who are the Jews? What is Judaism? What is Jewishness? And what are the relationships between those three?

So far, my American tour seems to progress very well. My very experienced tour manager insists that it is actually a breakthrough. In spite of the Zionist and the Anti Zionist Zionists’ (AZZ) relentless campaign against me, I give a talk every night, I give three to five interviews a day (radio and TV), I meet the most wonderful people on this planet, I speak about Jazz, Jewishness and apartheid, and I explore the true meaning of the Jewish State and its lobbies around the world.

And yet, my detractors seem to be devastated. My personal Defamation League is clearly outraged by some of my statements — they insist that I am a ‘racist’ and ‘anti Semitic’. They contend that people like me do not have room in the ‘Palestinian solidarity movement’. Is it that they know better who is ‘kosher’ and who is not?

Yet, in spite of their efforts they have still failed to find even a single racist or anti semitic statement in my entire body of work. As embarrassing as it may be, in the list of quotes they cherry picked, I actually refer to Jewish ideology, Jewish culture and Jewish heritage — but I never criticise Jews as a race, a people or an ethnicity. The reason is obvious: I am a humanist and an anti racist. I oppose Jewish racism and exceptionalism, whether it is Zionist or ‘anti’ Zionist.

If anything, the list of quotes that was initially put together to defame me, actually achieves the complete opposite: it stands as a glimpse into Jewish Marxist morbid philosophy. And it certainly suggests what the topics are that the Anti Zionist Zionists want us to avoid.

They for instance, do not want us to explore the colonial hoax — They quote my attack on one of their ideological mentors, the archaic Two-Stater Marxist, Moshe Machover:
“Machover’s reading of Zionism is pretty trivial. ‘Israel,’ he says, is a ‘settler state.’ For Machover this is a necessary point of departure because it sets Zionism as a colonialist expansionist project. The reasoning behind such a lame intellectual spin is obvious. As long as Zionism is conveyed as a colonial project, Jews, as a people, should be seen as ordinary people. They are no different from the French and the English, they just happen to run their deadly colonial project in a different time.” (http://www.gilad.co.uk/)

Where is the problem exactly? Is it really anti-Semitic or racist to suggest that the Marxist colonial paradigm is a lame spin? Clearly not: it may be right or wrong but it isn’t anti-Semitic. The truth of the matter is that Israel and Zionism are not colonial projects and have never been. Colonialism presents a clear materialist and spiritual exchange between a Mother State and a Settler State. But the Jewish State has never had a Mother State. In other words, Israel is a Jewish nationalist settlement project and its Jewishness is inherent to its racist, tribal, exceptionalist nature.

My Private Defamation League also wants to prevent us from looking into Jewish heritage and the role of the Old Testament in shaping the unethical Israeli attitudes, politics and practices. They quote me saying,
“The never-ending robbery of Palestine by Israel in the name of the Jewish people establishes a devastating spiritual, ideological, cultural and, obviously, practical continuum between the Judaic Bible and the Zionist project. The crux of the matter is simple yet disturbing: Israel and Zionism are both successful political systems that put into devastating practice the plunder promised by the Judaic God in the Judaic holy scriptures”. (“Swindler’s List: Zionist Plunder and the Judaic Bible,” Redress Information & Analysis, April 5, 2008)

I am trying to figure it out: why, exactly, are a bunch of alleged ‘progressive’ Jews and one Angry Arab opposing a search into the topic?

The answer is immediate: they obviously realise that in my writing I do not differentiate between Zionism and Anti Zionist Zionists. As far as I am concerned, they are both equally racist and supremacist.

“Sadly, we have to admit that hate-ridden plunder of other people’s possessions made it into the Jewish political discourse both on the left and right. The Jewish nationalist would rob Palestine in the name of the right of self-determination; the Jewish progressive is there to rob the ruling class and even international capital in the name of world working class revolution”. (Ibid)

Is it really racist to criticise Israel or Jewish Marxism ala Bund? Are Jewish political ideologies beyond criticism? Is this the true meaning of chosen-ness?

The Atzmon Defamation League wouldn’t allow us to discuss Jewish ideological supremacy. For some reason they are convinced that there is something wrong in my suggesting that,
“I do not consider the Jews to be a race, and yet it is obvious that “Jewishness” clearly involves an ethno-centric and racially supremacist, exclusivist point of view that is based on a sense of Jewish “chosen-ness.” (“An Interesting Exchange With A Jewish Anti Zionist”)

The message is clear: The Atzmon Defamation League contends that Jews are somehow special and beyond criticism — but they won’t allow us explore this specialness

The Atzmon Defamation League is pretty amusing, in spite of the fact that the league is engaged in a rabbinical excommunication exercise against me. They are criticising me for pointing out what the Jewish Herem exercise is all about.
“Neither the Zionists nor the ‘anti Zionists’ managed to drift away from the disastrous herem culture. it seems that the entire world of Jewish identity politics is a matrix of herems and exclusion strategies. In order to be ‘a proper Jew,’ all you have to do is to point out whom you oppose, hate, exclude or boycott. (“The Herem Law in the context of Jewish Past and Present,”)

My Defamation League doesn’t want the Jews to learn or understand their past. Like Zionists, they want to control the vision of Jewish history. Hence I am quoted saying ,
“Within the discourse of Jewish politics and history there is no room for causality. There is no such a thing as a former and a latter. Within the Jewish tribal discourse every narrative starts to evolve when Jewish pain establishes itself. This obviously explains why Israelis and some Jews around the world can only think as far as ‘two state solution’ within the framework of 1967 borders. It also explains why for most Jews the history of the holocaust starts in the gas chambers or with the rise of the Nazis. I have hardly seen any Israelis or Jews attempt to understand the circumstances that led to the clear resentment of Europeans towards their Jewish neighbours in the 1920s-40s.” (Jewish Ideology and World Peace,”)
Needless to say that I am very proud by each of the quotes picked by my private detractor league. This bunch of Anti Zionist Zionists attempt to block any possible criticism of Jewish identity politics and Jewish history. Like any hard core Zionist my Marxist Defamation League succumbs to the vision that Jews are somehow special. They must believe that Jewish history, culture, ideology and identity are beyond criticism.

But they don’t stand a chance. We will open this discourse. We will celebrate our freedom to think, to exchange and to explore.

Tragically enough, the Atzmon Defamation League, refrains from engaging in an intellectual or ideological exchange. The meaning of it is devastating. Like the Zionists, the so called Jewish ‘anti’ Zionists have managed to exclude themselves from the most crucial discourse regarding Jewish identity politics. Voluntarily and consciously they set themselves apart from the public discourse. They react exactly like the Israelis; they build around themselves a wall of deafness and blindness. This wall is consistent with their Jewish ideological philosophy but it is also symptomatic of their growing irrelevance.

Let’s meet the Atzmon Defamation League*
  • As’ad AbuKhalil, The Angry Collaborator News Service, Turlock CA
  • Max Ajl, essayist, rabble-rouser, proprietor of Jewbonics blog site, Ithaca NY
  • Electa Arenal, professor emerita, CUNY Graduate Center/Hispanic & Luso-Brazilian Literatures and Women’s Studies, New York NY
  • Gabriel Ash, International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network, Geneva, SWITZERLAND
  • Dan Berger, Wild Poppies Collective, Philadelphia PA
  • Lenni Brenner, author, Zionism in the Age of the Dictator, New York NY
  • Susie Day, Monthly Review, New York NY
  • Todd Eaton, Park Slope Food Co-op Members for Boycott/Divestment/Sanctions, Brooklyn NY
  • S. EtShalom, Registered Nurse, Philadelphia PA
  • Sherna Berger Gluck, Prof. Emerita, California State University/Israel Divestment Campaign, CA
  • Andrew Griggs, Café Intifada, Los Angeles CA
  • Ken Hiebert, activist, Ladysmith, Canada
  • Elizabeth Horowitz, solidarity activist, New York NY
  • Karl Kersplebedeb, Left Wing Books, Montreal, CANADA
  • Mark Klein, activist, Toronto, CANADA
  • Mark Lance, Georgetown University/Institute for Anarchist Studies, Washington DC
  • David Landy, author, Jewish Identity and Palestinian Rights: Diaspora Jewish Opposition to Israel, Dublin, IRELAND
  • Bob Lederer, Pacifica/WBAI producer, Queers Against Israeli Apartheid, New York NY
  • Matthew Lyons, Three Way Fight, Philadelphia PA
  • Karen MacRae, solidarity activist, Toronto, CANADA
  • Marvin Mandell and Betty Reid Mandell, co-editors, New Politics, West Roxbury MA
  • Matt Meyer, Resistance in Brooklyn, New York NY
  • Michael Novick, People Against Racist Terror/Anti-Racist Action, Los Angeles CA
  • Sylvia Posadas (Jinjirrie), Kadaitcha.com, Don’t Play Apartheid Israel, Noosa, AUSTRALIA
  • Roland Rance, Jews Against Zionism, London, UK
  • Liz Roberts, War Resisters League, New York NY
  • Emma Rosenthal, contributor, Shifting Sands: Jewish Women Confront the Israeli Occupation, Los Angeles CA
  • Ian Saville, performer and lecturer, London, UK
  • Joel Schwartz, CSEA Local 446, AFSCME, New York NY
  • Simona Sharoni, SUNY, author, Gender & the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Plattsburgh NY
  • Abraham Weizfeld, author, The End of Zionism and the liberation of the Jewish People, Montreal, CANADA
  • Laura Whitehorn, former political prisoner, NYS Task Force on Political Prisoners, New York NY
  • Ben White, author, Palestinians in Israel: Segregation, Discrimination, and Democracy, Cambridge, UK
*Surprisingly enough, the ADL list above refrained from adding my arch-detractor Tony Greenstein. Is it because even they do not like to be associated with a person with such a vile past and sad reputation? I plead my private defamation league to show some mercy and comradeship and let Mr. Greenstein settle within their club.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!