Haniyeh to Iranian People: You Are Partners in Arab Victories

Updated
After kissing the Hand of Nato Mufti and meeting the leaders of Qatar, Bahrain and Kuwait, Haneya appeared in Tahran and delivered a speech before the millions of Iranians.

“The resistance will continue until all the Palestinian land, including Al-Quds, is liberated and all the refugees return," Haneyeh said. The Palestinian prime minister "rejected" the American and Zionist threats to the Islamic Republic, and the Western interference in the Arab and Islamic region, and stressed the importance of Islamic unity.

President of the Islamic Republic of Iran Mahmoud Ahmadinejad warned the people of the Arab and Islamic nation of wagering on the West to attain freedom and democracy, and asked the West to halt its interference in the region and its support to the occupying Zionists.

"Grand Ayatollah said no one doubted the sincerity of Mr. Haniyeh and his fellow combatants in continuing resistance and, pointing to the destiny of Yasser Arafat who was once a popular leader, adding that Arafat lost his position with regional nations because he deviated from the path of resistance."

Why would Khamenei remind Hamas about the destiny of Arafat if its sincerity in continuing resistance is not doubted?

I wonder if Haneya's rejecting Western interference in the Arabic and Islamic regoin is limited to Egypt, Tunis and Libya, or includes Syria?

Taking into consideration the developments in the Syrian scene after the anti-Syria campaign failure in both the Arab League and the UNSC, I am inclined to believe that Hamas is starting BIG U-TURN to return to its  old page, and Haneya without leaving Hamas position on Syrian\MB fence, is sending from Tehran an indirect message to Syria.

In other words, Hamas may have decided keep a distance from MB's sinking ship

More than one month ago, Sami Klaib, an Ex-Jazeerah jorunalist who left it with Ghassan bin Jedo because of its bias and fabrication, wrote about   Syria and Hamas Blame not Break, and concluded that:  No Valid Broker Damascus between Hamas Except Hezbollah "

In his latest transparent speech, Nasrallah talked about meeting some Islamist who advised him to stay on Syrian fence, to avoid losing support of Sunni masses, and who gave guarantees that nothing will change after the fall of Assad.

In his Ashurah speech, Nasrallah, indirectly addressed Hamas and Muslim Brothers in general, saying:

The enemy is this American Administration and its “tool” not “ally” in the region, Israel,

"O people and political forces, don’t be deluded by the American Administration as it is the one occupying your Palestine, violating your Al-Quds, threatening your Holy mosque, and it is the one responsible, even before the enemy, of holding thousands of Palestinians in prisons, and of displacing, torturing, and besieging them in Gaza and the West Bank.

Palestine should always remain the first central cause no matter how much the situation worsens, and the conflicts increased. This is what we believe in and work for.

In Egypt, major changes that shook Israel and urged Barack to have worries about them took place. We all have hope in Egypt, because any real transformation in Egypt for the sake of the nation and Palestine, will change Israel’s strategic atmosphere in the region, would limit Israel’s options in the region, and put it in front of a critical situation that threatens its existence.

This is the great challenge for the Egyptian political forces that will win in the elections and form the new authority. The challenge of Palestine, Al-Quds, Gaza, Camp David, and the country\s stance from this entity. "

We know that Hamas is torn in between being a resistance movement, and being the Palestinian branch of the International Muslim brotherhood, and was under external and internal pressure to  leave Syria. Hamas left Syria without declaring it.

As Hamad Bin Jasim expected, Hamas leadership realized that there is no Arab capital would welcome Hamas as a resistance movement. Most likely Hamas realized the promise to reconstruct Gaza are nothing but empty promises like the promises given by the Arab league after the 2008/2009 war on Gaza.

I guess, until the Syrian scene is clear Hamas Polical leadership would move to Gaza, and Haneya would replace Mishaal, and the later would leave Hamas to be the next Palestinian President. In other words Mishaal would negociate "Peace" and Haneya, would continue taking about full liberation from River to sea

Zahar, strongly criticize Palestinian Reconciliation Doha agreement

Zahar said the Agreement "constitutes a great danger for the project of the Islamic movement and an explicit recognition of the success of the Fatah programme based on cooperation and security coordination and negotiations and recognition of Israel at the time that the Arab and Islamic world opens to Hamas in recognition of the success of its resistance project." "the disadvantages of the agreement are endless because it contradicts the political process and the failure of Abu Mazen (Mahmoud Abbas) negotiating project and contrary to what was agreed in Cairo".

Zahar asked "In this atmosphere manufactured by Abu Mazen and security coordination between Israel and the West Bank devices could free and fair elections be conducted in the occupied West Bank? Therefore all awhat agreed in Doha contradicts reality and applicability and also compatibility wiyh  the Egyptian paper. He noted that the agreement contains several not agreed upon things, such as the issue of the return of Fateh Cadres to Gaza Strip and freedom. It is in the interests of the Fatah movement and not to favour reconciliation. More

• Ahmadinejad: Iran Renews Support for Liberating Palestine
• Hamas: No date fixed for second Mishaal visit to Jordan
• Hamas: Mashaal propose changing all leadership, military wing refuse

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!