- Finland Prepares For Large Military Drills To “Keep Russia’s Aggression In Check”
- Russian MiG-41 Stealth Interceptor And US Boeing X-51 Hypersonic Aircraft
- Russian Military Counterintelligence Detained Alleged Ukrainian Spy In Crimea
- How Will Iran, Russia And Turkey React To U.S. Decision To Stay In Syria After Defeat Of ISIS?
Saturday, 25 November 2017
“israel’s nuclear arsenal threatens global security” is locked israel’s nuclear arsenal threatens global security
Israel’s nuclear arsenal threatens global security
News ID: 4154396 –
Iranian Ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Reza Najafi made the remarks while addressing a meeting of the IAEA’s 35-member Board of Governors in Vienna on Friday.
He later slammed the West’s double standard approaches on Israel’s move to develop its nuclear program in violation of all international regulations.
The Iranian envoy also highlighted the repeated demands of the international community and the IAEA resolutions that the Israeli regime immediately join the NPT and Israel’s nuclear installations be subjected to the full monitoring of IAEA safeguards.
“The Zionist regime has unfortunately overlooked legitimate demands of the international community over the past years and continued to advance its military nuclear program in blatant violation of all international regulations and with the blind support of certain countries,” the official continued.
He added Israeli military nuclear activities are the main cause of concern among regional nations and the international community and urged the UN nuclear agency to closely and seriously attend to the issue.
Najafi also urged a complete ban on any type of nuclear cooperation with Israel.
“Israel’s nuclear scientists’ free access to nuclear facilities of some states occurs at a time when nuclear scientists from the NPT countries are assassinated by Israeli-led terrorists in the Middle East.”
Israel is estimated to have 200 to 400 nuclear warheads in its arsenal. The regime, however, refuses to either accept or deny having the weapons.
It has also evaded signing the NPT amid staunch endeavor by the United States and other Western states on international levels in favor of its non-commitment to the accord.
Also at the meeting, the Iraqi envoy, representing Arab League member states, in a statement condemning Western support for nuclear capabilities of the Zionist regime who caused failure of the 2015 NPT conference, called for the unconditional adherence of Israel to the NPT and inclusion of all nuclear facilities of Israel under the IAEA safeguards and emphasized that, to this end, the issue of Israel’s nuclear capabilities that threaten the region and the world should remain on the agenda of the Agency.
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
“PUTIN IS NOW THE WORLD’S ENERGY CZAR”
“PUTIN IS NOW THE WORLD’S ENERGY CZAR”
25.11.2017
Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries’ most powerful internal alliance, bringing together the oil producer group’s Gulf members, is disintegrating fast. As a six-month-old spat between Saudi Arabia and Qatar deepens, the organization’s Gulf ministers will have to scrap their tradition of meeting behind closed doors to agree policy before OPEC holds its twice-yearly talks, OPEC sources say.
“We used to have a WhatsApp group for all ministers and delegates from the Gulf. It used to be a very busy chat room. Now it’s dead,” said a senior source in the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries.
Four other sources told Reuters that there had been no official contact on oil policy between the Gulf Arab nations, in a grouping known as the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC).
The GCC includes OPEC members Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Qatar and non-OPEC Oman and Bahrain. OPEC meets on November 30 in Vienna to decide whether to extend global output cuts beyond March. Saudi Arabia and the UAE cut ties with Doha in June, saying Qatar backed terrorism and was cozying up to rival Iran. Qatar rejected the accusation.
“The ministers can’t meet,” another OPEC source said. “They may relay the message through the Kuwaiti or the Omani oil ministers, but Saudi and the UAE cannot meet publicly with the Qataris.”
Kuwait and Oman have refrained from taking sides in the dispute, over which Kuwait’s Emir Sheikh Sabah has led regional mediation.
None of the OPEC sources suggested the Qatar crisis would derail a widely expected decision by OPEC to extend price-boosting output cuts until the end of 2018, as almost all producers agree on the need to maintain policy. But dialogue within OPEC is likely to be complicated as the stand-off strikes at the heart of OPEC’s efforts to form a united front to stabilize a fragile oil market. It may also weaken the group’s Sunni faction at a time when predominantly Shi‘ite Iran and Iraq are raising their game.
”If the GCC is dead politically, then it will certainly have implications for OPEC policies. Not that it will necessarily disrupt decision-making, but it is making it more challenging and complicated,” the senior OPEC source said. “Qatar is not talking to the Saudis or the UAE, so OPEC’s Sunni wing is weaker. On the other hand you have the rapprochement between Iran and Iraq, a Shi‘ite alliance long in the making,” the senior source added.
As OPEC president in 2016, Qatar was instrumental in bringing together oil producers — including non-OPEC Russia — to agree to the supply-reduction deal. Since engineering Russia’s pact with the OPEC to curb supplies a year ago, Putin has emerged as the group’s most influential player. As one senior OPEC official put it on condition of anonymity, the Russian leader is now “calling all the shots.”
“Putin is now the world’s energy czar,” said Helima Croft, a former Central Intelligence Agency analyst who directs global commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets LLC in New York.
The current prices and geopolitical realities suggest the accord will be rolled over, according to Edward C. Chow, a fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington and a former Chevron Corp. executive.
“It’s mutually beneficial,” Chow said. “The Saudis need a large oil-producing partner to effectively influence the market and the potential for a greater geopolitical and economic role in the Middle East for Russia makes compliance with production cuts an expedient move for Moscow.”
Related Articles
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
استهداف مصر ومحاولات اغتيال في لبنان
استهداف مصر ومحاولات اغتيال في لبنان
نوفمبر 25, 2017
ناصر قنديل
– قد يظنّ البعض أن لا علاقة بين الاستهداف الأمني الكبير الذي تعرّضت له مصر، وبين الاستهداف الذي كان لبنان سيعيش تحت وطأته لولا اكتشاف جهاز أمن الدولة له وإحباطه في مهده، لكن الوقائع المتزامنة للعمليتين، في وقت كان لبنان يعرف أصعب أزماته الحكومية المفخّخة والمفتوحة على مشروع فتنة أهلية، تقول إنّ تفجير لبنان الذي لعبت مصر دوراً كبير في منع حدوثه، ليس بعيداً عن تفسير الرابط من جهة وتحديد الجهة التي تقف وراء العمليتين الخطيرتين معاً.
– في مصر مئات الشهداء والجرحى وضرب لهيبة الدولة وأجهزتها، ودفع الناس في سيناء خصوصاً لليأس من وعود الدولة بالقضاء على الإرهاب، لينصاع بعضها للتعاون مع رموز هذا الإرهاب، بقوة المثال الذي يقدّمه الإرهاب على قدرته على التحرّك، والتجذّر والمثابرة، ويدفع بأغلب السكان للنزوح عن سيناء طلباً لأمن مفقود، وشروط حياة الحدّ الأدنى، وهذا يعني الاقتراب من تحويل سيناء مركزاً بديلاً للإرهاب بعد خسارة العراق وسورية، وإعلاناً للاقتراب أكثر من ليبيا، حيث مصر معنية أيضاً، ومن أوروبا حيث الهدف الأهمّ للإرهاب، وأوروبا كانت في الأزمة اللبنانية الأخيرة شريكة مصر في احتواء عناصر التفجير، التي قالت عنها «إسرائيل» إنها فرصة ذهبية لا يجوز تفويتها لجعل حزب الله يدفع ثمن تهديده أمن «إسرائيل» في الداخل اللبناني وعلى أيدي اللبنانيين.
– في لبنان محاولة طازجة لاغتيال وزير الداخلية نهاد المشنوق والوزير السابق عبد الرحيم مراد، كلّ منهما كان يلعب في جبهته عنصر التبريد والتواصل مع الضفة الأخرى، لتشكيل خط وسط يستطيع صناعة تسوية، ولكلّ منهما بالمناسبة علاقته العميقة والوطيدة بمصر، ولو نجحت المحاولة لا سمح الله لكانت أصابع الاتهام ستتجه فوراً، كما جرت العادة في حالات مشابهة لحزب الله،
والمحاولة أُجهضت باكتشاف المكلَّف بالتحضير للعملية من الموساد «الإسرائيلي»، وهو مخرج وممثل لبناني، يصعب توقّع قيامه بمهام أمنية على هذه الدرجة من الخطورة، والمحاولة على خلفية مواكبة مشروع تفجير لبنان التي أريد لها أن تبصر النور مع استقالة مفخّخة لرئيس الحكومة سعد الحريري، وقطع الطريق على مشاريع التهدئة، والخاسر الرئيسي من إجهاض التفجير بحلقاته كلها هي «إسرائيل»، وهذا لم يعُد استنتاجاً، بل حقيقة مع بيان الجهاز الأمني اللبناني الذي كشف العملية وأجهضها.
– نجح لفترة بعض المندسّين لحساب «إسرائيل» في الجسم الإعلامي العربي بتسخيف كلّ اتهام لـ «إسرائيل» بالتخريب، ولولا النجاح الأمني اللبناني بكشف المعلومات وتوثيقها لكان اتهامنا لـ «إسرائيل» موضع سخرية من الكثيرين لكن المهمّ الآن هو أن ينتبه المصريون إلى أنّ تنامي دور مصر في التفاهم الفلسطيني ومشروع المصالحة على قاعدة حفظ سلاح المقاومة، مصدر أرق وغضب لـ «إسرائيل»، وأن ينتبهوا إلى أنّ تقدّم موقفهم في سورية ونحوها لا يريح «إسرائيل»، وأنّ دور مصر في وأد التفجير في لبنان فجّر الغضب «الإسرائيلي» لأنه أجهض خطة «إسرائيلية» بالكامل.
– في زمن ينطق فيه ولي العهد السعودي بخطاب «إسرائيلي» في توصيف يشبّه إيران بألمانيا النازية، وهو وصف أطلقه مارتن أنديك، السفير الأميركي الأسبق لدى كيان الاحتلال، يصير تفجير لبنان بيد سعودية لحساب «إسرائيل»، وتدخّل مصر وأوروبا لمنع التفجير، بمثابة وقوف على خط الحرب. ومخطئ مَن يتوقع النظر للأمر بعين السعي لإزالة سوء تفاهم، ففي اللحظات الصعبة التي يعيشها «الإسرائيليون» ومثلهم الحكم السعودي الجديد، تدير «إسرائيل» كلّ شيء، بعين الحرب ولغتها، ولا تملك إلا الذراع الأمنية. وهي في حال إفلاس سياسي وعجز عسكري. والأمن هنا تفجير واغتيالات وإرهاب، والحليف الأقرب والأفعل لهذه المرحلة هو التنظيمات الإرهابية بالواسطة أو مباشرة، وسيناء محور صفقة بين «إسرائيل» والتنظيمات الإرهابية.
– إذا كان تعليق الرئيس المصري على ما استهدف مصر، الغالية على كلّ عربي، أنّ مصر تقاتل وحدها يقصد تجاهل قتال سورية والعراق وقوى المقاومة للإرهاب فهو مخطئ، خصوصاً أنه سبق وأعلن أنّ مصر ستكون وجهة الإرهابيين بعد هزيمتهم في سورية والعراق، لكن إنْ كان قصده أنّ سورية والعراق قاتلا ومعهما حلفاؤهما من المقاومة وإيران وصولاً لروسيا، بينما حلفاء مصر يتركونها وحدها، فهو محقّ، لكن ذلك يطرح السؤال عن السبب، أليس باختيار الحلفاء الخطأ، والسؤال الأهمّ عن: كيف يجب أن تتصرّف مصر؟
– التهديد الضمني للرئيس سعد الحريري في كلام ولي العهد السعودي إن عاد لرئاسة الحكومة، يحمل الكثير من المعاني.
Related Videos
Related Articles
- Lebanon State Security: ‘Ziad Itani’ Arrested on Charges of Collaborating with Israeli Enemy
- امن الدولة اللبنانية يوقف “المسرحي زياد عيتاني” بجرم التخابر والتعامل مع العدو الإسرائيلي واعترافه بمهام كلف بتنفيذها بينها رصد سياسيين؟
- مذبحة في سيناء ومحاولة لاغتيال المشنوق ومراد… رسائل «إسرائيلية» لمصر ولبنان
- مذبحة في مسجد للصوفية في سيناء: تحويل المواجهة في اتجاه «طائفي»
- مصر أقوى من الهمجية!
- Egypt Will ‘Vigorously’ Respond to North Sinai Attack: Sisi
- ماذا تنتظر مصر للخروج من العباءة السعودية و انتزاع دورها المفقود؟
- » الدور الحمائي للإرهاب الصهيوني يحمي الإرهاب الوهابي
- Hezbollah Denounces Terrorist Attack in Egypt’s Arish: Outcome of Takfiri Thought
- Sinai Mosque Attack: 150+ Dead & Injured in N Egypt
- نتنياهو: الزعماء العرب ليسوا عائقا أمام توسيع العلاقات مع “إسرائيل” وما نخشاه هو الشعوب العربية
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
With the fake excuse of “fighting ISIS” gone the USA still intends to illegally stay in Syria
Russia Today — Nov 23, 2017
The US plans to keep its troops in Syria long after the defeat of ISIS – the goal used to justify their illegal presence in the first place – because the Syrian government and its ally Iran would “win” if they were withdrawn, the Washington Post reported.
The Trump administration is “expanding its goals” in Syria to include a “potentially open-ended commitment” to support the Kurd-dominated Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), the newspaper reported on Wednesday, citing several anonymous US officials. The change comes as the defeat of the Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS) terrorist group in Syria seems imminent.
Washington has been justifying its deployment of ground troops in Syria, which violates the embattled nation’s sovereignty, by citing the need to fight IS. US Defense Secretary James Mattis last week went so far as to erroneously claim that the US had been given a mandate to be in Syria, stating: “You know, the UN said that … basically, we can go after ISIS. And we’re there to take them out.”
While Washington has a history of skipping UN approval for its military interventions, be it in Syria or in other sovereign states, it appears that the semblance of legitimacy for keeping hundreds of troops in Syria is about to be dispelled. WaPo sources say that Washington actually sees its boots on the ground as a source of leverage in dealing with the government of President Bashar Assad and his allies.
“An abrupt US withdrawal could complete Assad’s sweep of Syrian territory and help guarantee his political survival – an outcome that would constitute a win for Iran, his close ally. To avoid that outcome, US officials say they plan to maintain a US troop presence in northern Syria… and establish new local governance, apart from the Assad government, in those areas,” the newspaper said.
If true, it means Washington will be actively promoting Kurdish separatism to spite Damascus and Tehran, while paying lip service to preserving Syria’s territorial integrity.
“The conditions are there for the counter-ISIS campaign to morph into a counter-Iran campaign,” Nicholas Heras of the Washington-based Center for a New American Security told WaPo. “By placing no timeline on the end of the US mission… the Pentagon is creating a framework for keeping the US engaged in Syria for years to come.”
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
Debunking israeli Hasbara Myths one by one
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
The Truth Will Get You Into Trouble
By Gilad Atzmon
Perhaps in the goyim’s world, the truth will set you free, but in the Jewish Chronicle’s universe, the truth gets you into trouble. In the ghetto, the truth is at best an obstacle and at worst, a bitter enemy that must be suppressed. The Jewish Chronicle today reveals that an inquiry has been launched into the conduct of a truth telling teacher who had the audacity to present historical facts in the “presence of pupils.”
Apparently, Ethan Saunders, who teaches history and politics at Jewish Free School, “strongly defended” Ken Livingston’s truthful statements about Zionist collaboration with Nazis. Saunders’ statements came during a book launch for Dr. David Hirsh’s latest book, ‘Contemporary Left Antisemitism.
Hirsh, an anti intellectual academic and a dedicated hasbara mouthpiece, complained to the JC:
‘“There were questions from students and then a teacher stood up at the back and, in a fairly kind of belligerent way, said: ‘I don’t agree with anything you said.’ He said that I hadn’t told the whole story to the students; it was a pretty clear allegation not only that I kind of got it wrong, but that I was speaking in bad faith.”
Doing things in bad faith is symptomatic of Hirsh’s conduct as a notorious Zionist disinformation merchant. Many, including yours truly, have pointed out his duplicitous inclinations in the past.
Mr. Saunders reportedly said:
“You (Hirsh) haven’t explained to the students about the Ha’avara Agreement and the real collaboration between the Nazis and the Zionists. […] You haven’t explained that it was Israel who was responsible for nurturing Hamas at the beginning, and Hamas is a creature of Israel’.”
The 1933 Haavara Agreement points at a clear collaboration between Nazi authorities and the Zionist entities. It is also true that Israel, and in particular Ariel Sharon (as the head of IDF’s Southern Command), planted the seeds of Islamic resistance in the 1970s.
Still, Hirsh whined to the JC that “He [Saunders] strongly defended Livingstone – his defence of Livingstone was that Livingstone was correct.”
Neither Hirsh nor the JC even try to dispute the validity of Saunders’ remarks. Instead they reveal their anxiety that the truth may actually set the Jewish students free. “I’ve no idea what he teaches his students,” Hirsh told the JC, “but I have to tell you that [at this event] what he was clearly trying to teach his students was something which I would worry about. What he was trying to teach them was certainly a cause for concern.”
Hirsh, the JC and other Jewish institutions clearly regard facts and proper historical thinking as a lethal threat. Why? If Jews delve into their past in an attempt to understand its historicity, they may well gather that they are repeating the exact mistakes in the present!
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
'They never send their children to fight for their country'
Reported by Gilad Atzmon
Israel’s deputy foreign minister Tzipi Hotovely attacked U.S. Jewry in an interview with i24 News on Wednesday. Hotovely referred to American Jews as “people that never send their children to fight for their country, most of the Jews don’t have children serving as soldiers, going to the Marines, going to Afghanistan, or to Iraq. Most of them are having quite convenient lives…”
PM Netanyahu was very quick to condemn his deputy minister. This is understandable, after all Jews being reluctant to fight American wars doesn’t fit nicely with the embarrassing fact that America has been fighting Israeli wars for a while. The pro-war Neocon school is largely a Zionist gathering and the Jewish American Lobby has been pushing for the escalation of immoral interventionist conflicts in Iraq, Syria, Libya and Iran.
Haaretz writes today that “the U.S. military stopped recording the religion of recruits decades ago, but until then Jews served in slightly greater proportion than their percentage in the general population.” It would be fascinating to find out what the current figures are.
If they want to burn it, you want to read it!
Update: Haaretz didn’t do its homework. Apparently, there is a record available of faiths within the USA military. It reveals that out of the 1.300.000 American soldiers, only 4.515 are Jewish. Jews make only 0.3% of the American military. Israeli Deputy foreign minister Tzipi Hotovely was telling the truth. Jews are seriously under represented within the American military!
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
B is for Book Burners
The New York Daily News reports that Leaders of a prominent West Side synagogue are threatening to cancel a book fair next month unless a nearby store ditches a pro-Palestine children’s book.
“P is for Palestine” teaches children the alphabet using Palestinian references. But Rabbi Ammiel Hirsch (photo above) of the Stephen Wise Free Synagogue said it also glorifies violence.
“The book states that ‘I is for Intifada,’ Arabic for rising up for what is right, if you are a kid or grownup!” Rabbi Hirsch said in an open letter posted on the temple’s website. “The intifada was not ‘a rising up for what is right.’ It was a mass descent into immorality.”
It would be helpful if the Rabbi explains to us how a popular uprise against a brutal racist occupier is ‘immoral.’ I would also like to learn from the rabbi whether book burning is a reform Jewish value, it has clearly become a popular exercise.
The book “P is for Palestine” is on sale at the Book Culture bookstore on Columbus Ave. on the Upper West Side.
Or buy online here
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
The MBS – Blackwater marriage of convenience
November 23, 2017
by Ghassan Kadi for the Saker blog
Mohamed Bin Salman’s (MBS) royal Saudi coup is still in the making and its stories of mystery and intrigue are unfolding.
Some recent articles written about this unprecedented Saudi development have focused on whether or not MBS was actually desirous of instigating reform within the kingdom of sand and capable of putting together the infrastructure that made such reform possible and how. Other more cynical articles have cast little doubt on his ability to create any change and classified him as yet another puppet of the legacy that his grandfather King Abdul Aziz, the founder of the Saudi dynasty, has forged with the West. In between the two extremes, many perhaps waited in anticipation to see what was to happen next in the now quick-changing kingdom that did not change at all in essence for nearly a hundred years.
To put recent developments into perspective, we must objectively look at MBS’s achievements and failures since his rise to prominence; with a special emphasis on the developments of the last few weeks.
MBS has failed to turn previous Saudi Government failed policy on Syria to his advantage by distancing his own legacy from it. If anything, the outcome of the Syrian opposition conference that was held in Riyadh was a farcical outcome of Saudi diplomacy. Not only did this conference coincide with the 20th of November 2017 Putin-Assad Sochi victory summit, but it is still “demanding” the removal of Syrian President Assad from power.
The arrogant and seemingly naive Saudis seem to be still under the illusion that they are able to dictate terms of settlement of the “War on Syria” despite the fact that they have put all of their efforts into winning it but have lost decisively. However, the more painful fact for them is that they lost without a single bargaining chip remaining for them to capitalize on.
Whilst MBS can be “excused” for not being able to find a face-saving way out of Syria, he has failed abysmally in the war that he orchestrated in Yemen, and as this war drags on, the international community is beginning to wake up to the atrocities and genocide that the Saudi-led coalition is inflicting upon Yemen, and no one can be held more accountable for this military failure and crime against humanity than MBS himself.
MBS also failed to contain the loss he “inherited” from the failures of previous Saudi policies in Lebanon and Iraq. If anything, his determination to remain steadfast with these has turned regional Saudi policies into a total joke.
So where did MBS score any success, if any at all?
In my previous related articles and herein, I have mentioned and reiterate that MBS is increasingly gaining popularity within the ranks of young and educated Saudi men and women of all ages and in general amongst the grass-roots of the population. Hence, in this venture, he is scoring two birds with a single stone. In rounding up more popular support, he is confiscating and freezing badly-needed cash under the pretext of corruption.
The estimates of the number of incarcerated Saudi princes and businessmen are not any less subject to a game of guess work than the funds involved in this kerfuffle. Ignoring how many men have been put under detention, the tally of funds confiscated and frozen is estimated at a minimum of USD 150 bn to a maximum of USD 800 bn.
Given that the total official Saudi savings reserve is in the tune of “only” USD 700 bn after decades of high financial times, even the low estimate of USD 150 bn is a huge sum by proportion and by any proportion of course. It is little surprise that MBS is trying to replenish into the coffers of the state such sums, and if he manages to do it, it would be to his credit.
Whilst on the subject of official Saudi savings, after many decades of huge petroleum exports and at elevated prices, the Saudi savings reserve figure should be in the vicinity of a few trillion dollars. But a huge proportion of Saudi petro-dollars has been squandered on royal funds, holidays yachts, prostitutes, drugs, bribes, theft, corruption at all levels, and on this account and this account only, MBS can be acknowledged for bringing corrupt individuals to account.
But whether or not MBS is able to stamp out corruption and/or whether or not he is guilty of the same charge, as his cousins and some others argue, how much command does he have over the affairs of the kingdom, and over the royal family he staged a coup against?
Inside, unconfirmed reports allege that whether or not MBS has any command on traditional local troops that he can rely on, he is not taking any second chances.
To elaborate, the reader ought to be reminded that the Al-Saud legacy built its reign of power (and terror) on Wahhabism and money. Wahhabism was used as the doctrine, and money was the catalyst for buying loyalty and support.
With MBS’s purge on the royals, no traditional royal supporter with known wealth is left feeling safe. How can they feel safe if they hear reports of news of princes like Al-Walid bin Talal not only being in custody, but also getting tortured and his assets frozen and sieged by the state?
In my previous article, The Second Saudi Dynasty: MBS’s Reset Button, http://thesaker.is/the-second-saudi-dynasty-mbss-reset-button/ , I wondered how can MBS count on any local supporters. Apparently, he is not.
Recent inside information that was later on published in various media, reports that MBS has been using Blackwater to do his dirty work.
If those reports are true, MBS has hired Blackwater to arrest, with orders to kill whoever resists arrest, Saudi princes and high-ranking businessmen, and to answer to no one but him. In retrospect, the fatal shooting of Prince Abdul Aziz, son of former King Fahed, was highly unlikely to have been done by a Saudi as this would attract a death sentence in the event of the coup failing.
It has even been reported that Blackwater personnel are driving around in tinted Saudi Police and security agency personnel vehicles in a manner that is totally unbeknown and hidden from the Saudi public. This cannot be corroborated any more than they can realistically be dismissed.
If true, such reports indicate that MBS’s coup is not over. They indicate that he is not taking any chances, but most practically, they indicate that he trusts no one; no one expect Blackwater.
Most importantly and significantly however, such news, if confirmed, indicates that MBS does not have a true hold on power. If such is the case, and seeing the ambition he has, there is more reason to believe that MBS is going to have no choice but to go with his cousins all the way to the wire and until he has destroyed them all and confiscated all of their assets.
After all, he needs their money to achieve his dreams and get his kingdom out of its financial mess. He needs to blame his failure on them. He needs to eliminate any possible claim they can make for the throne.
Almost overnight, MBS has changed Saudi Arabia from a kingdom of sand upon which Al Saud reigned with a solid foothold and strong base, to a kingdom of quick-sand upon which princes and power brokers no longer have a leg to stand on. They either have to pledge total and unconditional loyalty to MBS or fear persecution. On the other hand, if they do pledge that loyalty, and MBS’s coup fails as a result of a counter-coup, then they will risk being seen as enemies of the winners of the counter-coup. It is a damned if you do and a damned if you don’t situation.
Not any less perplexing than the dilemma of the princes is the dilemma of the lower tiers of power in Saudi Arabia; especially senior military officers and their subordinates. With its tribal mentality, Saudi Arabia has had several tiers of armed forces, some of whom are loyal to particular princes rather than to the state itself. Prince Mutaib for example, the son of former King Abdullah, was until the 4th of November, the Minister of the National Guard. The hierarchy within the National Guard are loyal to him personally, and now the big boss is in jail. MBS therefore has a few options; either to coerce those military officers to become loyal to him under the risk of them stabbing him in the back, or, to throw everyone in jail and bring his own people in. But, where would he bring his own people in from and who are they to begin with? After all, and despite all the great power he gave himself, he is Mr Johnny-come–lately and he hasn’t had the advantage of time to slowly build his own army. His practical alternative was based on pragmatism and securing his own safety, and to that effect, he cannot find a more faithful and better trained army than Blackwater. And even though Blackwater does not come cheap, but clearly to MBS the objectives he seeks justify the costs.
Some may argue that Blackwater can also be bought by counter coup leaders and even foreign governments. Whilst this is possible, MBS remains to have no better alternative. However, one would imagine that for a company like Blackwater, to guarantee its business success and continuity, it would have a strict code of conduct that stipulates that it will refrain from entering contractual agreements that can generate conflict of interest between its clients. After all, and irrespective of its criminal and underhanded mercenary modus operandi, who would hire it knowing beforehand that it is in the habit of breaking contracts and replacing them with ones with the adversaries? Whilst it is arguable as to whether or not any client of Blackwater can actually take legal action against it and win is another story because, without any doubt, Blackwater, inhumane and criminal as it is, cannot afford to see its reputation ruined.
To sum it up therefore, whilst MBS’s coup is still in the making and its final outcome remaining unclear, what is evident is that MBS does not have enough local Saudi power base that he can rely on in the upper echelons of power. Whilst his grass root popularity among the general population is on the rise, traditional power brokers can neither be supportive of him, seen to be supportive or seen to be against him. Either way, and even though some of them could potentially become strong and faithful proponents of MBS, at the moment any pledges of allegiance are highly risky for all involved.
In his reliance on Blackwater however, MBS is achieving a more guaranteed short term objective. However, this policy can backfire very violently; because it is allowing certain key Saudi power brokers to sit on the fence for a little longer until they see who is the final winner in all of this for them to eventually back.
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
Lebanese actor arrested for spying on behalf of Israel
Lebanese actor arrested for spying on behalf of Israel
BEIRUT, LEBANON (6:40 P.M.) – The Lebanese actor, Ziad Itani, was arrested by the State Security Directorate General, Friday, after it was discovered he was spying on behalf of Israel.
Itani admitted to the Lebanese security forces that he was in constant contact with an Israeli intelligence officer in Turkey before he was apprehended on Friday.
According to a communique from the State Security Directory General, Itani was plotting to assassinate the Lebanese Interior Minister, Nihad Mashnouq, and former minister, ‘Abdel-Rahman Murad.
Itani will be formally charged in the coming days.
Lebanon State Security: ‘Ziad Itani’ Arrested on Charges of Collaborating with Israeli Enemy
State Security arrested on 23/11/2017 the Lebanese Actor and Playwright, Ziad Ahmed Itani, on charges of collaborating and communicating with the Israeli enemy, State Security Directorate General said in a communiqué on Friday.
After several months of monitoring, follow-up and investigations within and outside Lebanese territories, a specialized unit of the State Security, under direct instructions and orders from the Director General, Major General Tony Saliba, managed to virtually confirm the offenses against the suspect Ziad Itani.
During interrogation, Itani confessed to his charges, and acknowledged the tasks he was assigned to implement in Lebanon.
Itani acknowledged that he was tasked to monitor a group of high-level political figures, and consolidate relationships with their close associates, in order to get the most details about their lives and jobs and focus on their movements.
He was also tasked to provide them with extensive information on two prominent political figures, whose identity will be disclosed in subsequent statements.
The General Directorate follows up on this dossier under the supervision of the concerned judiciary.
Source: NNA
Related Articles
- امن الدولة: توقيف زياد عيتاني بجرم التخابر والتعامل مع العدو الإسرائيلي واعترافه بمهام كلف بتنفيذها بينها رصد شخصيات سياسية
- كُلِّف برصد شخصيات لبنانية … توقيف زياد عيتاني بجرم التعامل مع إسرائيل
- من مناضلة إلى مشتبهٍ فيها بالتعامل مع العدو الإسرائيلي!
- تل أبيب تكشف للمرة الأولى: لدينا علاقات سرية مع الرياض
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
Saudi Arabia Has Become An «Irrational Actor in ME»
24-11-2017 | 16:10
Saudi Arabia has become much more aggressive in the Middle East as the United States has pulled back from its traditional role in the region, according to Philippe Dauba-Pantanacce, global geopolitical strategist at Standard Chartered bank.
“We’re seeing a series of miscalculations … We tend to think that Saudi Arabia has become an irrational actor in the Middle East,” Dauba-Pantanacce told CNBC Thursday.
His comments come as the Sunni Islamic kingdom’s foreign policy actions are increasingly forcing instability upon smaller nations, where analysts believe Saudi Arabia is seeking to amplify sectarian divisions. These moves have unfolded against the backdrop of escalating competition between Saudi Arabia and its Shia arch-rival Iran.
“I say this because every single foreign venture they (Saudi Arabia) try has reached the opposite result that they wanted. In Yemen, in Qatar, and now in Lebanon,” he said.
In the latest twist to come out of Middle East geopolitics, Lebanon’s Prime Minister Saad Hariri on Wednesday suspended his previous resignation, apparently in order to open “a new gateway for responsible dialogue,” he said in a statement. Whether this came with Saudi approval is not yet known.
The prime minister returned to Beirut Tuesday night following an unexpected two-week stay in Saudi Arabia, where he delivered a shock resignation from the capital Riyadh on November 4. This prompted widespread speculation that the prime minister was “held hostage,” as well as consensus among analysts that Saudi Arabia forced Hariri to resign.
“What Saudi Arabia is miscalculating is that in (holding) the PM of Lebanon probably against his will in the country, it has managed the feat of unifying all of Lebanon against Saudi, including the constituency of Lebanon that is traditionally sympathetic to Saudi,” the strategist explained.
An ‘outbreak of unity’
A diverse country of 18 different religious groups, Lebanon’s fragile political system is based on power-sharing between Sunnis, Shiites and Christians. This often results in a fractured and gridlocked government and society, most vividly manifested in a bloody 15-year civil war that only ended in 1990.
Hariri, a Sunni who holds Saudi citizenship and is a traditional Saudi ally, has since 2016 led a consensus government including Shia political party and group Hezbollah — something the Saudis apparently would not tolerate. The group, which Saudi Arabia classifies as a “terrorist” organization, is Lebanon’s most powerful political body.
Saudi Arabia’s efforts are part of its campaign to isolate Hezbollah and freeze its involvement in regional conflicts in which the Sunni kingdom has interests, like Yemen and Syria. But as Dauba-Pantanacce explained, its military campaign in Yemen has actually prompted greater Iranian involvement there, and its actions concerning Lebanon have brought the fractured country together.
Supporters of Lebanon’s resigned Prime Minister Saad Hariri hold up placards demanding his return from Saudi Arabia on the starting line of Beirut’s annual marathon on November 12, 2017. Hariri announced on November 4 in a televised statement from Riyadh that he would be stepping down from the post, sending shock waves through Lebanese politics.
Supporters of Lebanon’s resigned Prime Minister Saad Hariri hold up placards demanding his return from Saudi Arabia on the starting line of Beirut’s annual marathon on November 22, 2017. Hariri announced on November 4 in a televised statement from Riyadh that he would be stepping down from the post, sending shock waves through Lebanese politics.
“We see an outbreak of unity in Lebanon for their PM because they saw the attitude of Saudi Arabia as humiliating for Lebanon. It’s interesting that we’ve seen this unity against Saudi — Saudi probably outplayed its hand in this conflict,” he told CNBC.
Dauba-Pantanacce attributed the kingdom’s intensifying foreign aggression to Saudi Arabia’s new leadership, headed up by the young Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. The prince has moved to consolidate power through both foreign interventions like its offensive in Yemen and a domestic “anti-corruption” purge of government officials. Dauba-Pantanacce also noted the US’s “retrenchment” from its traditional role in the region as partly to blame for growing Saudi influence.
Source: CNBC, Edited by website team
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)