Friday, 8 May 2009

Hariri Tribunal Seeks Help from Lebanon Neighbors


Hariri Tribunal Seeks Help from Lebanon Neighbors
Readers Number : 29

08/05/2009 The head of the court created to try the killers of Lebanon's Rafiq Hariri said Friday he wanted a deal with countries in the region to simplify the surrender of suspects.

"I have already prepared a draft agreement on judicial cooperation which should be offered to all the countries of the region: Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Iran, Turkey, Israel," Antonio Cassese said.

The Italian judge heads the tribunal created to try those responsible for the 2005 car bombing that killed former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri and 22 other people. The tribunal currently has no suspects in custody since ordering the release last week of four pro-Syrian generals held by Lebanon for nearly four years without charge.

The accord envisaged by Cassese would allow prosecutors to interview witnesses in the mentioned countries, to have suspects summoned to The Hague for questioning, and facilitate the transfer of accused persons. It aims to find a way round the fact that the national laws of some countries prevent them from surrendering suspects without an extradition treaty.

It would also be submitted to countries like France, the United States and Argentina that have large Lebanese communities, Cassese said. "That does not mean that we expect there is a suspect or witness or fugitive (there)," said the judge, at the seat of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon at Leidschendam near The Hague.

He added that "probably, many countries will never accept" the agreement, and may prefer to work with the tribunal on a case-by-case basis which would be "less quick, but not impossible". He hoped to hand drafts of the deal to ambassadors in The Hague in the next few weeks and finalize its negotiation and ratification by December.

Cassese said he would visit Beirut in June or July, after the Lebanese parliamentary elections, for a courtesy call on the new government and talks with lawyers and judges about the tribunal's rules and procedures.

Mehlis Insists: Detention of Four Generals Was Legal!
Readers Number : 53

08/05/2009 Former head of the International Independent Investigation Commission (IIIC) Detlev Mehlis insisted on Friday that the arbitrary detention of the four Generals over the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri was legal when he left his post.

Knowing that the detention was arbitrary and without charges, the former IIIC head claimed that his recommendation to the Lebanese judicial authority to arrest the four Generals was based on the legal system adopted in Lebanon, Germany and France, which allows taking suspects into custody to prevent them from fleeing.

Mehlis went on to say to claim that the detention of the four Generals, who were released last week after four years of an arbitrary detention, was not only based on the testimony of Mohammad Zuhair Siddiq, but other witnesses, in addition to the "evidence" found in the houses of the four generals. "The IIIC would have retracted its decision to detain the General if it proved to be wrong," he added.

He also said he thought that the investigation process would finish in one year, adding that if it was on the right track, the case would have already been closed.


Madsen: Cheney Had Death Squad, Killed Hariri & Hobeika
Mehlis..The German Fox Who Hunts His Prey At Any Cost

Dahlan's new definiton of collaboration


Dahlan's new definiton of collaboration


"The Palestinian Authority has established a special counter-intelligence squad in its West Bank-based security services to uncover agents working for Hamas and Hezbollah, the daily Haaretz reported yesterday.Haaretz said that the Palestinian Authority (PA) security services have so far arrested dozens of Palestinians suspected of collaborating with the two groups."


Posted by As'ad at 7:24 AM

Construction of a Palestinian "outpost" next to the settlers outpost in Hebron

Link




(c) Anne Paq/Activestills.orh, Hebron, 08.05.2009.

Today there was a very brave and bold action in Hebron. A group of Palestinians, Israelis and internationals built in a few minutes a shack on the lands of the Jabari family in protest of the illegal building of settlements, just next to a new settlers' outpost located close to the settlement of Kyriat Arba on 8.05.2009. The settlers tried to destroy the shack and even attempted put it on fire but they did not manage. They also repeatedly attacked and provoked the group. I was myself kicked above the knee.
The Israeli soldiers and police arrived at the scene and violently pushed the group away while the settlers were allowed to stay. 8 Israelis, 2 Palestinians were detained.

see the video:


and the article:
outh protest against consrtuction of illegal Israeli outpost; settlers throw burning rags at internationals
Date: 08 / 05 / 2009 Time: 14:12
تكبير الخط تصغير الخط
Photos courtesy of
Youth Against Settlements [Ma'anImages]
Hebron – Ma’an – Israeli soldiers detained five Israeli citizens working as peace activists protesting the establishment of an on illegal settlement east of Hebron in the West Bank.

The Israeli activists, along with a dozen international activists and Palestinians were demonstrating near the land of Issa Jaber in the Al-Buwaira area of Hebron.
Protesters built small booth, mirroring a hut constructed on the land last month by Israeli settlers on Palestinian-owned land. According to the group Youth Against Settlements, the settlers are trying to impose a “de facto” situation on the land and create an illegal settler outpost on the area and effectively annex the land.

According to the youth, Israeli soldiers arrived shortly after 10am, when the hut was built. The soldiers took positions around the settlers, who were pelting the protest hut with stones, heavy tools and gas-soaked rags set aflame. The whole incident, said the youth group was “under the leadership of their fundamentalist leader Baroukh Marzel.”

Israeli soldiers told activists they were no longer permitted to use the land and launched sound bombs at the tent. Troops arrested the Israeli activists, under a legal dictate that prohibits Israeli citizens from entering areas of the West Bank under Palestinian Authority control.

In addition to the five Israelis, and three international activists, local resident Wael Azaatari, was also arrested. The rest of the protesters were forcibly removed from the area.


Aujourd'hui, une action tres courageuse et temeraire s'est deroulee à Hébron, pres de la colonie de Kyriat Arba. Un groupe de Palestiniens, Israéliens et internationaux a construit en quelques minutes une construction sur les terres de la famille dans Jabari juste à côté d'un des nouveaux avant-poste construit par les clons il y a quelques semaines. Les colons ont bien entendu essayé de détruire la cabane et même tenté d' mettre le feu mais ils n'ont pas reussi. Ils ont également attaqué à maintes reprise le groupe et ont multiplie les provocation. J'ai moi-même reçu un coup de pied au-dessus du genou.
Les soldats israéliens et la police sont arrivés sur les lieux et ont poussé violemment le groupe tandis que les colons ont été autorisés à rester. 8 Israéliens, 2 Palestiniens ont été arrêtés.


Posted by Anne Paq at 8:10 AM






(c) Anne Paq/Activestills.org, Hebron, 08.05.2009
Posted by Anne Paq at 7:53 AM

The Pace of the American-Syrian "Tango" Quickened.....US renews sanctions against Syria



This is How You Do the American-Syrian Tango.....


Jeffrey Feltman (hated former US ambassador to Lebanon and arch Zionist) and Syrian Deputy Foreign Minister Going at it today......


The Pace of the Dance is Set to Quicken Soon.....

# posted by Tony : 4:48 PM

Link to my Comment: The Donkey from Yankeevile PREYING on the American-Syrian Tango

I would add the following on the American-Syrian Tango

In the FT, here

"...The sanctions, which were introduced by the Bush administration in 2004, will remain in place for another year, a state department official told the Financial Times.

The order mainly affects weapons trade, Syrian Air, and the property of people with links to anti-Israeli groups including Hamas, Hizbollah and Palestinian Islamic Jihad....

“Unfortunately, it remains Syrian policy to continue a destabilising agenda in the region,” representatives Mark Kirk (Republican-Illinois) and Eliot Engel (Democrat-New York) wrote in a letter to the president.

“Weakening sanctions now, just before the Lebanese parliamentary election in June, would embolden Syria’s attitude toward Lebanon and potentially cause certain factions to question the new administration’s resolve regarding Lebanon’s independence,” they said.

But Joshua Landis, a Syria expert at Oklahoma university, said that renewing the sanctions sent the wrong signal. “It was promulgated by the Bush White House, which believed that it could break Syria through a combination of economic, judicial, military and diplomatic pressure. Intimidation did not work,” Mr Landis wrote in a posting on his Syria Comment blog.

“Obama has promised that he will change the nature of US relations in the region. If he renews the Bush sanctions it will be a step in the wrong direction. What impression will it leave in Damascus or the Arab street? Certainly not a good one,” he wrote..."

Posted by G, Z, & or B at 10:41 AM

And this: Netanyahu: Israel will NEVER withdraw from Golan
Haaretz, here

"Remaining on the Golan will ensure Israel has a strategic advantage in cases of military conflict with Syria," Netanyahu said during a briefing he gave to the reporters.....Netanyahu said that he intends to emphasize to Obama the need to deal with Iran and its "nuclear program, which is a major obstacle to peace in the Middle East."

Posted by G, Z, & or B at 12:35 PM

"A Boy, a Wall, and a Donkey" by Hany Abu Assad

Contributed by Ali

Ali said...
UP
Shame on you for humilating Donkeys.Check this
A Boy, a Wall, and a Donkey" by Hany Abu Assad
7:07 AM, May 08, 2009

uprooted Palestinian said...
AliI appologize to all donkeys, except those walking on 2 legs.
Thanks for the link

"A Boy, a Wall, and a Donkey" by Hany Abu Assad




Labels: , , ,


Netanyahu to Form Committee to Tackle Int’l Lawsuits





Netanyahu to Form Committee to Tackle Int’l Lawsuits

07/05/2009 A ministerial committee headed by Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman will be appointed to lead the Israeli struggle against lawsuits filed around the world against military and defense establishment officials, ministers and Israeli public figures.

The Israeli government is slated to approve the appointment of the committee during Sunday's cabinet meeting. The committee's main objective will be to foil, by any means, any such legal proceedings.

The committee will be continuing the work started by the intra-ministerial team appointed for this purpose by the previous government, headed by then-Justice Minister Daniel Friedmann.

But the Netanyahu government takes international lawsuits very seriously, and will appoint a broader and "heavier" committee to tackle them. The committee will include eight ministers and the attorney general.

The committee's first mission will be to face the reopening of a Spanish investigation against six Israeli figures including Binyamin Ben-Eliezer and Dan Halutz into the 2002 assassination of Hamas official Salah Shehadeh, in which 14 civilians were killed.

Israeli sources have called the renewed investigation a "cynical move".

The committee will be headed by Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, and will include Attorney General Menachem Mazuz, Defense Minister Ehud Barak, Interior Minister Eli Yishai, Justice Minister Yaakov Ne'eman, Deputy Premier and Minister for Regional Development Silvan Shalom, Welfare and Social Services Minister Isaac Herzog, Minister of Information and Diaspora Yuli Edelstein and Minister Yossi Peled.

The proposal to have the committee formed will be filed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. According to the proposal, committee will have the following authority: "To deal with the diplomatic and political aspects arising from the State of Israel and its citizens' exposure to the proceedings of international lawsuits, including the aspects pertaining to dealing with individual lawsuits. The committee will discuss the various options for promoting understanding and agreement with countries around the world to minimize and prevent the abuse of universal authorities. The committee will have at its disposal experts from the field of international law, the field of politics, and the field of PR on the international plane."


Barak: I Will Work to Have Spanish Lawsuit Annulled
Batoul Wehbe Readers Number : 222

05/05/2009 Commenting on the Spanish court's decision to proceed with an investigation against Israeli officials suspected of crimes against humanity, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak said he would appeal to the top Spanish offices to have the lawsuit annulled. "There is no army as moral as the Israeli army," he added.

Several Israeli officials voiced their objections on Monday to Spanish judge Fernando Andreu’s announcement that he plans to continue a war-crimes probe into the involvement of Israeli politicians and military officials in the 2002 bombing of Hamas resistance senior official Salah Shehadeh’s residence which killed him and another 14 people mostly women and children.

Barak said he would turn to the Spanish government with a request to prevent the probe. “I do not doubt that the people involved in the assassination acted with a clear mind and a single goal, to protect the citizens of Israel.”

The Israeli justice ministry lashed out at the Spanish decision as “judicial terrorism” and accused the Palestinian Center for Human Rights, which initiated proceedings, of exploiting the Spanish judiciary to distort Israel’s image and advance a political agenda against it.

DICHTER “SURPRISED”
Former minister Avi Dichter, a suspect in the probe, said Monday, “I'm surprised that in a country like Spain a judge finds it difficult to distinguish between war on terror and what he terms 'crimes against humanity.'” “The death of innocent civilians is unfortunate”, Dichter alleged, but the fault lies with “terrorists who turn civilians into a human shield.”

However, Dichter said he was not overly concerned regarding the probe, despite the fact that Andreu could issue an arrest warrant for his arrest that would be valid throughout the European Union. “I can buy Belgian chocolate here and watch Spanish soccer games on television,” he said.

WHO GAVE SPAIN THE RIGHT TO JUDGE?

Dichter's fellow suspect, Major-General Doron Almog, expressed outrage at the ruling. “What is Spain to get involved in an internal affair? What moral high ground do they have? What superior justice do they have? Who gave them the right to judge between us and the Palestinians, or to decide what's legal and what isn't?”

Both Almog and Dichter warned that similar cases were likely to follow the Spanish case. Other EU nations, including Britain, allow court cases involving foreign nationals on foreign soil.

Alon Ben-David, an Israeli military analyst, said that Israel knows how to contain a matter like this. “Had the Israeli government took a step in the appropriate time, the probe wouldn’t have reached to the court. But the stone entered the well and we need many wise men to get it out,” he added.

The suspects named by Andreu are then-Defense Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer, former Israeli occupation forces Chief Moshe Yaalon, then-Air Force Commander Dan Halutz, former GOC Southern Command Doron Almog, Giora Eiland, then-head of the Israeli National Security Council and Mike Herzog of the Defense Ministry.

PTT Happy Birthday from Uprooted Palestinians and congrtulation for your great work

Palestine Think Tank: celebrating our first year!

By Gilad Atzmon • May 7th, 2009 at 21:18 • Category: Gilad Atzmon, Ideas and Projects, Israel, Newswire, Opinions and Letters, Our Authors, Palestine, Religion, Resistance, Somoud: Arab Voices of Resistance, War, Zionism

WRITTEN BY GILAD ATZMON


Back in January, at the peak of the Israeli sinister campaign in Gaza, I spoke to Mary on the phone. The situation was rather grave. We were both pretty depressed. Though it was rather obvious that Israel wouldn’t win that genocidal war, it was also evidently clear that Israel was not going to stop in its tracks. It had managed to detach itself from any recognisable notion of humanism. It wasn't concerned at all with its image around the world. As the Israelis were pouring WMDs on Gazans and the numbers of Palestinian casualties were mounting, we learned that 94% of Israeli Jews supported the genocidal tactics. As if this was not enough, we also learned that all over the world Jews were rallying in support of their criminal nation state. In Palestine Think Tank, like in many other solidarity sites and blogs, we were working around the clock disseminating the information and analysis. That morning when talking to Mary I complained to her that we were publishing papers everyday: news reports from Gaza, some illuminating critical reading of the situation, enlightening, refreshing political analysis, our posts were receiving thousands of entries and yet, I expressed my concern, we failed to make it to the main press. Mary was quick to correct me. “Gilad, you may fail to see it, we do not want to assimilate into the so-called media, we do not need them. From now on we are the media.”



That night I performed in Oxford. When I eventually made it home at 3 am, 2,000 fresh emails blocked my inbox. Many messages were congratulating me for being courageous, a few promised to poke my eyes out or break my fingers. I couldn’t grasp what really happened. I am used to Zionist abuse as much as I am accustomed to very empathic messages from humanists around the world. However, I had never seen it with such intensity. I failed to figure out what happened but I was too tired to engage in it all, I just closed my eyes.

In the morning Mary's text message woke me up at around 9 am. From the text I learned that she was apparently very proud and yet I failed to figure out why exactly. I called her. This is when I learned about the Turkish Prime Minister Tayep Erdogan citing a paper we published on PTT at the World Economic Forum.

I realised that Mary was right. We do not need the BBC, CNN, the Guardian or the New York Times. As far as the Palestinian discourse is concerned, we are indeed the media and we are not alone. We are there together with the people in Gaza, in the West Bank and with thousands of activists, bloggers, writers and free thinkers all around the world. We are together at the forefront in a bitter battle for a better world.

I’ve been writing about the conflict since 2001. In the early days I was very popular here in Britain. I was regarded as the ‘ultimate good Jew’. The Guardian commissioned me to write about Jazz. The BBC commissioned me to compose peaceful music. The so-called ‘Jewish anti-Zionists’ booked seats for my concerts weeks in advance, hoping that not before too long I would join them in manipulating the peace movement into submission. They obviously gambled on the very wrong horse.

It didn't happen. It didn’t take long before I realised the obvious: Israel was the Jewish state. I grasped also that Zionism was a continuation of Jewishness. I realised that Zionism and Jewish anti-Zionism are both supremacist ideologies for being racially orientated precepts. I comprehended that the war in Iraq served Israeli interests. Seemingly, in the leftist circles that were quick to embrace me, I couldn't say it all. Tragically and devastatingly, I found out that the left in Britain was handled as if it was a private Jewish tribal affair. It couldn’t suit me. I obviously did not want to operate as a Jew. Not even as a good Jew or a Marxist one. I left Israel for a reason. I did it because I decided, at least to try, to join humanity as an equal member. Being a ‘chosen one’ didn’t appeal to me and the more I looked into it, the concept of Chosen Socialists seemed to me lame on the verge of amusing.

I wanted to say what I think and feel. Yet, it was clear to me that Palestinian solidarity was far from being a free discourse. There were too many things that we couldn’t say or express.

I am a jazz musician. Not only do I believe in freedom, I have made freedom into my bread and butter. As much as I try to reinvent myself night after night in clubs and concert halls around the world, for me, to grasp the Israeli/Palestinian conflict is to elaborate on the issues courageously: to revise and reinvent myself intellectually and ethically rather than repeating a given mantra. For me to understand the conflict is to self-reflect. For me to criticise Jewish power is to primarily look in the mirror and bash the Jew in me. For me, to liberate Palestine is also to liberate the Palestinian solidarity discourse of Jewish hegemony.

This is exactly what we are trying to do in PTT. Sadly enough, for a resistance movement, we suffer a severe shortage of intellectual discourse. This is the outcome of years of devastating gatekeeping. I confess, I probably failed to liberate a single Palestinian so far but I feel that in PTT we have managed to introduce a free form of intellectual debate. We are not afraid of dealing with any given topic. Naturally, we deal with Jewish identity and power. We talk about global Zionism. We obviously refrain from any racial reference to Jewishness. This is quite easy, considering the fact that Jews are not a race.

The other day, I learned that PTT’s ranking within the Palestinian Authority is less than 5000, this means that we are one of the most read English language political magazines in Palestine. I know that in an Internet Café in a refugee camp in Lebanon, PTT is set as a default welcome page. This is what we’ve achieved in just one year. I am proud and I want to thank everyone who helped us to achieve it all. We had too many writers to mention. I would like to thank all the very many sites and blogs that circulate our materials. The adorable Tlaxcala who translate our materials, sometimes even before we post them. As far as the old-fashioned media is concerned, they are indeed in trouble. We have better analysts, better writers, dedicated readers, a network of supporters and translators but most important, the truth is in our side.

If Freedom is primarily freedom of spirit, we better just start there, the liberation of Palestine will follow soon.



A Year of Publishing Dangerously, WRITTEN BY MARY RIZZO

It was precisely a year ago today that Palestine Think Tank was launched. It was the result of three friends pooling together their resources to create something that was more than the sum of its parts. All of us already had popular outlets, but our objective was to create a new, larger, shared platform for ourselves and for others with the same goal we’ve already had as our priority: a Free Palestine.



It of course takes much more than one, a dozen or a thousand sites to make a Free Palestine. Just what it takes we all have yet to discover, but we are convinced that in order to get a free Palestine, the bare requisite is that those who face this issue are capable and willing before all else to Free our Minds.

This is why Palestine Think Tank has recruited some of the best writers and artists, and why some of the best writers and artists have approached Palestine Think Tank for publication. Some might consider us hardliners, in that we believe in resistance, open discourse, the rule of law as opposed to vague calls for peace. Yet choosing not to assume a moderate, all-encompassing line that might be pragmatic, was not a difficult choice at all. To be a “moderate” we see as dishonest. So we remain true to ourselves and our cause, and those who come to read, to write and to create for Palestine Think Tank know our principles because they share them. The beauty of Palestine Think Tank is that its space provides a platform for the widest possible range of perspectives and analysis so that the goal we all seek can have the widest possible support.

We don’t check ID cards at the door. There is no ethnic discrimination for participation. In fact, we find that limiting and exclusionist (when not outright exclusivist). Those who contribute can be Palestinian, Israeli, Jewish, Muslim, Christian, Atheist, Hindu, American, European, Asian, Arab, Persian, Male, Female, Young, Old, Marxist, Anarchist, Libertarian, Progressive, Islamist, Arab Nationalist, Palestinian Nationalist, Anti-Imperialist, etc. All we require of them in the way of being is that they share one opinion: That Zionism is Racism and Israel is a Racist State based on Discrimination of non-Jews. That’s the simple opinion that people who contribute here share, and the way that they analyse overcoming that state of affairs is what our platform is here to provide. We have a space for thoughtful discourse, wide-ranging and varied, but all contributors must share the view that the only way to free Palestine is to resist thought control, to express reasoned-out views and fight any attempts to distort facts and attempts to give false information. However, the main voice that matters to us is the voice of Somoud: the Arab Voice of Resistance, and our site reserves the main position for these people who we believe should rightfully dominate the discourse, as they are the subjects of Israeli and Imperialist oppression. The quantity of amazing texts that have filled that space is proof that our intuition was right. The Somoud posts are the heart and soul of Palestine Think Tank.

The variety of our contributions is reason to feel thankful to all the men and women who have been part of this adventure. At this moment, our site has approximately 950 posts by more than a hundred authors. More than half of the posts are by women, and three-quarters are written by non-Western writers. This may be an absolute record for sites regarding Palestine, and it most certainly is a record for Palestinian News Sites in English. Our articles generally originate at Palestine Think Tank, then they are reprinted, translated, republished and linked around the world. Our readers span the entire globe, with daily visits from an average of 50 countries, sometimes peaking at 100 different countries on given days.

We realise that this year has been especially tragic for the Palestinian people. The devastation that has been brought upon them by Israel, supported and justified by the Western Mainstream Media indicates to us that providing information and analysis alone is not enough.

In order to truly bring forth our desire of a free Palestine the only way forward is that we must support resistance.

What is resistance? We’d like to offer a brief reply. When responding to a post on a site that commented on several of our articles, there was a reference to Peace Initiatives. While it is true that all of us want peace and we all want it to be an immediate and lasting peace, it is also true that peace initiatives often do not have that kind of intention, vitiated at the source as they are by a misrepresentation of what peace actually means.

In part of the reply to that query, one of our editors wrote this brief summary:

Consider that there are 3 players in the Middle East: 1) the Israelis, 2) the Palestinians, 3) so-called internationals who are then subdivided into; a) “international community” i.e., the West; b) those who are not included in the West. Mind… I think that the West includes for instance the regimes of Jordan and Egypt, but not the national population, which are in part b.


If you are still following me, the needs of the groups are as follows: for 1) something they call security, which includes remaining a Jewish state; for 2) need for freedom and safety (different than security because they are undergoing an existential threat and need protection from their aggressor who does not allow them their rights. 3a) wants stability and security so that their economic interests will not be damaged; 3b) seeks justice along with safety, but does not have the power to determine achieving any of this without in some way receiving help from 3a.


So, what 1 (Israel) calls “peace” means: to be left in peace;


2 (Palestinians): peace is to survive and obtain rights according to laws that already exist but are not applied, so peace is dependent upon struggle first (resistance that will succeed);


3a (Western International Community): that Israel wins or at least that the resistance does not, because resistance is contagious;


3b (Non-Western Internationals): that the resistance wins, so that the power differences can be reduced. They believe prosperity for the region will follow.


So, in the light of this, all peace initiatives that have been drawn up, Oslo, Annapolis, Geneva, etc… do not take into account the needs of 2 and 3b, who are the underdogs whose rights are being violated. They are designed to dislodge resistance, therefore, to maintain or institutionalise inequality between people.


It is not that I’m an enemy of Israel per se, I am an enemy of racist Israel. If they tomorrow decided to allow the right of return, that would make me change my tune. It is not enough to claim they want peace and would stop the occupation or the settlements. This is a lie. If they wanted it, it would have been done years ago or they could do it overnight. It is not in their plans.

So, I support the resistance, it is supported by all international treaties against occupying powers. Israel militarily occupies Palestine and mentally occupies the rest of us by making us think that the way to peace is through an agreement. This won’t ever happen. Not after the recent war either… These forces are not seeking peace, just destruction, and they have to be treated as the war criminals they are.



There it is, in a nutshell, to Free Palestine requires analysis and resistance. We have to understand the mechanisms, then we have to follow that up with actions, which means to support the resistance fearlessly, because only the resistance will lead to freedom. We won’t always be right in our analysis, since we are limited humans, and our actions won’t always bring the effects we seek because we are powerless when divided, but the alternative is unacceptable. So here we are.

We wish to thank all of our dear friends who have been there with and for us through these trying times. It’s not always been an easy ride, and providing fresh, new, strong content is a task that requires time, energy and love, and we thank our friends, contributors, supporters and "fans" have generously "been there". In the comments section we will name people who have given a special contribution to our efforts, because they deserve public thanks for the support and time they have dedicated.



A special thanks to our very dear friend, the one and only Carlos Latuff for creating yet another unforgettable image!

Tagged as: , , , , , , , , ,



Gilad Atzmon is a jazz musician, composer, producer and writer.
Email this author All posts by Gilad Atzmon

The Big (Hidden) Agenda

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

LOL: Arab Foreign Ministers decide to file a lawsuit against occupation


Arab Foreign Ministers decide to file a lawsuit against occupation

[ 08/05/2009 - 11:05 AM ]


CAIRO, (PIC)-- Arab Foreign Ministers meeting in Cairo on Thursday decided to file a lawsuit with the International Court of Justice against the Israeli occupation for its drive to Judaize Jerusalem.

A diplomatic source at the Arab League said that the ministers had three issues on their agenda; dangers engulfing Jerusalem, discussion of the report by the committee commissioned to investigate Israeli war crimes during the war on Gaza and to reach a common Arab stand towards the latest developments in the Arab-Israeli conflict.

The Ministers called on the UN Security Council, the Quartet committee and concerned regional and international organisations to intervene to stop Israel measures in east Jerusalem, which the ministers said aim to Isolate Jerusalem, uproot its Arab residents and Judaize the city.

They also called for financial support to help Palestinian residents of Jerusalem withstand Israeli pressures to leave.

The Ministers also decided to form a committee of legal experts to confront the Israeli occupation practices in Jerusalem.

They called for an intensification of the efforts to bring Israelis accused of committing crimes against humanity and genocide to justice.

The meeting was attended by ministers of half the member countries, the other half was represented by ministerial officials who had full authority to vote.

The Donkey from Yankeevile PREYING on the American-Syrian Tango

Link


This is How You Do the American-Syrian Tango.....Jeffrey Feltman (hated former US ambassador to Lebanon and arch Zionist) and Syrian Deputy Foreign Minister Going at it today......
The Pace of the Dance is Set to Quicken Soon.....

# posted by Tony : 4:48 PM



Comment: The American-Syrian Tango worries AIPAC, Israel and off cource the Donkey preying from YAKEEVILE.

Israel is worried of possible breakdown of U.S.-Israel cooperation under Obama, and the Donkey (posing as a "Great" anal-ysist), is worried of possible breakdown of Syria-Hamas/Hezbullah/Iran cooperation.

Hamas was all the time under his fire, accused of using resistance to get to negociation table.

Out of sudden he joined a writer (who cannot be named For personal security reasons) in spreading Zionist rumors claiming that Hamas starts feeling the heat from Syria.


BTW, more than one year ago the Donkey preyed that It was more Tango, that Syrian and American are bedfellows,

However, the above worries raise a big question (Bigger than Tony's one cell brain):

Is Hamas worried off or Happy for The American-Syrian Tango set to Quicken Soon??

In other words: Is Hamas using the resistance to get to negociation table?

If so why should feel the heat from Assad calling Obama's adminstration to talk to Hamas and Hezbullah?

However, Obama still hoping that Mubarak woluld deliver a domesticated Hamas, rejected Assad's proposals for opening talks with Hamas and Hizbullah, saying the two groups had to renounce violence first, While both Syrai and Iran affirmed solidarity with resistance.

Isn't "absolutely strange for someone voicing such a call to ask the Hamas leaders to leave the country," Thus commented Ali Baraka, the deputy representative of Hamas Movement to Syria, on the Zionist's rumors.

Or

Is Hamas a resistance movement worried of the American-Syrian quickenning Tango?
If so why the same Donkey is worried for the Fath-Hamas Tango performed in Cairo:

He preyed
Flashback: "So when I (THE DONKEY) hear Hamas declaring that it would stop an Israeli invasion of Gaza, I just shake my Head. (AND OFF COURSE HIS LONG EARS)"
"Stupid" Hamas, went to the TANGO party in Cario after after the Gaza "Suicidal" Tango "facing the Israeli tanks and missiles, and white phosphore, to stop selling out Palestinian rights, not to give "political cover to ....puppets who will betray the Palestinians is an act of betrayal on the part of Hamas itself."
In refusing a Government controlled by ramallah traitors, Hamas, as I expected in a previous comment disapointed both Donkey's preying from Yankeevile and Ramallah, consequently Abbas is considering forming New Gov't without Hamas
Finally,

Donkeys neither play piano, neither football, nor understand the bloody rules of the so called Tango.
Donkeys are know as the best for carring "HUGE BURDENS OF BOOKS" without understanding them. Besides BREYING, nowadays "Modern" Donkeys, can cut and paste, decorate, blog and Anal-yse
UP

ISRAELI ACTIVIST TO BE JAILED FOR CARING


LINK

Poster for a movie made about Nawi and his heroism

Israeli Activist To Be Jailed For Caring

By Neve Gordon

06 May, 2009
The Guardian

Without international intervention, Israeli human rights activist Ezra Nawi will most likely be sent to jail.

Nawi is not a typical rights activist. A member of Ta'ayush Arab-Jewish Partnership he is a Jewish Israeli of Iraqi descent who speaks fluent Arabic. He is a gay man in his fifties and a plumber by trade. Perhaps because he himself comes from the margins, he empathizes with others who have been marginalized ~ often violently.

His "crime" was trying to stop a military bulldozer from destroying the homes of Palestinian Bedouins from Um El Hir in the South Hebron region. These Palestinians have been under Israeli occupation for almost 42 years; they still live without electricity, running water and other basic services and are continuously harassed by Jewish settlers and the military ~ two groups that have united to expropriate Palestinian land and that clearly have received the government's blessing to do so.


As chance would have it, the demolition and the resistance to it were captured on film and broadcast on Israel's Channel 1. The three-minute film ~ a must see ~ shows Nawi, the man dressed in a green jacket, not only courageously protesting against the demolition but, after the bulldozer destroys the buildings, also telling the border policemen what he thinks of their actions.


Sitting handcuffed in a military vehicle following his arrest, he exclaims: "Yes, I was also a soldier, but I did not demolish houses. The only thing that will be left here is hatred."

The film then shows the police laughing at Nawi. But in dealing with his audacity, they were not content with mere ridicule and decided also to accuse him of assaulting a policeman. Notwithstanding the very clear evidence (captured on film), an Israeli court recently found Nawi guilty of assault in connection with the incident, which happened in 2007, and this coming July he will be sent to prison. Unless, perhaps, there is a public outcry.

Nawi's case is not only about Nawi. It is also about Israel and Israeli society, if only because one can learn a great deal about a country from the way it treats its human rights and pro-democracy activists.

Most people are not really surprised when they read that human rights activists are routinely arrested, prosecuted, imprisoned and harassed in Syria, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Morocco and several other Middle Eastern countries. Indeed, it has become common knowledge that the authoritarian nature of these regimes renders it dangerous for their citizens to actively fight for human rights.

In this sense, Israel is different from most of its neighbours. Unlike their counterparts in Egypt and Syria, Israeli rights activists, particularly Jewish ones, have been able to criticise the policies of their rights-abusive government without fear of incarceration.


Up until now, the undemocratic tendencies of Israeli society manifested themselves, for the most part, in the state's relation to its Palestinian citizens, the occupied Palestinian inhabitants and a small group of Jewish conscientious objectors.

People might assume that Nawi's impending imprisonment as well as other alarming developments (like the recent arrest of New Profile and Target 21 activists, who are suspected of abetting draft-dodgers) are due to the establishment of an extreme right wing government in Israel.


If truth be told, however, the rise of the extreme right merely reflects the growing presence of proto-fascist elements in Israeli society, elements that have been gaining ground and legitimacy for many years now.



Nawi's case, for what it symbolises on both an individual and societal level, encapsulates the current reality in Israel. His friends have launched a campaign, and are asking people to write letters to Israeli embassies around the world. At this point, only international attention and intervention can make a difference.

Neve Gordon teaches politics at Ben-Gurion University. Read about his book Israel’s Occupation @ www.israelsoccupation.info
My Photo Posted by Barbara L at 1:58 AM Links to this post

Are You Legally Anti-Semitic? The New Discourse on anti-Semitism

Are You Legally Anti-Semitic?

Antisemitism as defined by Congress and the US State Dept

Image ‘Copyleft’ by Carlos Latuff

On Oct 16, 2004 AD, President Bush signed into law the global anti-Semitism review act; which is quite interesting. The United States state Department list the following sets of beliefs as being anti-Semitic.

1. Any assertion that the Jewish community controls government, the media, international business and the financial world is anti-Semitic.

2. Any strong anti-Israel sentiment is anti-Semitic.

3. Virulent criticism of Israel’s leaders, past or present, is anti-Semitic.

4. Criticism of the Jewish religion or its religious leaders or literature, especially the Talmud and the Kabala is anti-Semitic. [I wonder if that includes the traditions of the elders that Jesus criticized. “And woe unto the Pharisees” that Jesus said.]

5. Criticism of the US government and congress for being under influences of the Jewish/Zionist community, including AIPEC, is anti-Semitic.

6. Criticism of the Jewish/Zionist community for promoting Globalism, [the New World Order] is anti-Semitic.

7. Blaming Jewish leaders and their followers for inciting the Roman crucifixion of Christ is anti-Semitic.

8. Diminishing the 6 million figure of the holocaust victims is anti-Semitic.

9. Calling Israel a racist state is anti-Semitic.

10. Asserting that there exists a Zionist conspiracy is anti-Semitic.

11. Claiming the Jews and their leaders created the Bolshevik revolution is Russia is anti-Semitic. [I guess you have to revise history].

12. Making derogatory statements about Jewish persons is anti-Semitic. Now isn’t this interesting and all inclusive?

source

P.S. If you have functioning brain matter between your ears, you're probably legally anti-semitic. Anti-semitism seems to go hand and hand with truth and knowing truth.

Shafiq Morton
May 6, 2009

Those who criticize Israel or those who interrogate Zionism (the ism that gave birth to Israel) are often labeled "anti-Semitic" by the Zionist lobby. This lobby, a world-wide movement, is seen to be most influential in the United States where it vigorously defends the interests of Israel.

To view Israel unsympathetically means vilification by this group: it avows political critique is something that threatens the existence of all Jews. Yet, ironically, some of the most ardent critics of Israel have been Jews – academics and political liberals who have not denigrated their Jewishness in any way because of their conscience.

The truth is that the Jewish community (13, 3 million worldwide) is hardly a monolithic group that unquestioningly supports Israel’s policies. Studies by American academics, such as Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer, have graphically – if not uncomfortably – pointed to this.

In the multi-faceted Diaspora, it’s becoming evident – particularly since Gaza – that reservations have emerged about Zionist hasbara. This is the spin that suggests Israel is a country enjoying an exclusive right to be a victim, and that Israel can spurn international law because of this.

Often depicted as the "Israeli David" versus the "Arab Goliath", the scenario is met in the Arab street with the comeback that the reverse is true. Israel has the deterrent of nuclear power and the best-equipped military in the Middle East. The Palestinians don’t even have generals.

The curse is that if a Jewish person breaks ranks with Israeli policy or Zionist ideology on humanitarian or political grounds, he or she becomes "self-loathing". This is similar to Islamic extremism, which deems that I’m a hypocrite if I don’t subscribe to its edicts.

But as Not in My Name founder Steven Feuerstein has explained: "We criticize Israel because of, not in spite of, our Jewish values."

One wonders then what people such as Professor Judah Magnes, founder of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, would think of today’s situation. He warned over 50 years ago of the dangers of nationalist Zionism becoming an "idol" of the Jewish people.

This is the peril of ideology being the sole medium of a nation’s socio-political discourse. The result is that the mores of humanity, and faith, are minimized. Ideology, often a virulent form of nationalism, is elevated to the altar of the black-white absolute. This is exactly where these isms become idolatrous extremes unto themselves.

In 2009 the ethos of the Zionist voice "being everywhere and saying the same thing" (as suggested by James Zogby of the Arab-American Institute) has seen Zionism becoming the demi-god of anti-Jewish conspiracy. The mantra of a "Jew behind every bush" happens precisely because the lobbyists have created this monster themselves.

This leads to the question: can the development of 21st century anti-Semitism be traced directly back to the lobbyists, to their total obeisance to Israel?

What role have organizations such as the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the international Zionist Congresses played in bringing the anti-Semitic house down on not only themselves, but possibly all Jews?

My response would be that they have played a hugely significant role. That and the nagging intransigence of Israel – a political reality, yes – but nevertheless a state in as much need of moral introspection and political rectitude as her dictatorial and corrupt Arab neighbours.

It’s my belief that conspiracy has led to a totally new discourse on anti-Semitism. And whilst I’m in agreement with a number of Jewish scholars that the nature of anti-Semitism might have changed, it’s obvious that I already differ on its dynamics.

For example, Canadian MP Professor Irwin Cotler – co-founder of the inter-parliamentary Coalition for Combating Anti-Semitism – would most likely be aghast at my idea that the growth of 21st century anti-Semitism could ever be self-inflicted.

However, I do agree with him on a point made in the Jerusalem Post (24 February 2009) that anti-Semitism has shifted from Jewish people in host societies to Israel. But where I would wholly disagree is that Israel – the so-called "collective Jew" – is an innocent victim still seeking acceptance in the world of nations.

Prof Cotler cannot wish away historical truths, such as the 1948 Nakba. This is the Palestinian catastrophe, one that caused two-thirds of the indigenous Arab population to be displaced. The Professor has to concede that the painful legacy of the Nakba is still unresolved after 60 fractious years.

He also has to concede that even the Israeli bete-noire, Hamas, has acknowledged the reality of Israel: for why has it spoken of a truce based on 1967 borders? And if Hamas is anti-Semitic due to its disavowal of the Zionist state, then it must be mentioned that Likud’s manifesto refuses to acknowledge Palestinian statehood too.

Coherent criticisms against the policies of Zionism – as we’ve already said – are concerns about humanitarian and socio-political issues in the Zionist state, not Judaism. There is a vital distinction. Zionism is a man-made, political system that cannot be exempt from scrutiny.

In his Jerusalem Post article Prof Cotler says that contemporary anti-Semitism is "the canary in the mineshaft of evil" and identifies three kinds: genocidal, ideological and legalized.

Prof Cotler writes that the most "lethal" type of modern anti-Semitism is genocidal. It manifests itself in three forms: state-sanctioned (Iran), in movement charters (Hamas) and in religious writs (fatwas) where "Death to Israel" takes on real meaning.

The second type is ideological. Here the Prof argues that it "disguises" itself as part of the struggle against racism. He expresses discomfort at Zionism being equated with racism, and with Israel being labeled an "Apartheid" or "Nazi" state". These he sees as tools of ideological anti-Semitism.

The third category is legalized anti-Semitism, where all of the above join to de-legitimize and to actively seek out Israel "for differential and discriminatory treatment in the international arena".

And whilst I find Prof Cotler’s points interesting, if not contentious, my departure point is more the language of the discourse, rather than his fears – real or imagined.

For like Abraham Weizfeld, a Canadian-based Jewish activist, I believe that the "inflated language" currently used in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has become thoroughly demeaning.

As he points out, the fear-mongering of Israel’s Deputy Defence Minister, Matan Vilnai, that Hamas rockets would bring a second "Shoa" (Holocaust) upon the people of Gaza, hardly justified it becoming an extended metaphor.

The subsequent Israeli invasion of Gaza saw violations of the Geneva Convention and possible war crimes, but it was not a "Holocaust". Calling Gaza a "Holocaust", he said, was not even useful. Rather than illustrating what happened, it thoroughly degraded the Palestinian cause.

Indeed, in the Middle East I’ve seen "inflated" language detract from the real concerns, thus allowing politicians to avoid the hard questions and for the issues to become clouded with emotionalism.

For example, a Palestinian figure shouting "Jewish pigs", the "disciples of Satan" and "Nazis" is hardly indulging in constructive political oratory. However, can Menachim Begin proclaiming that Yasser 'Arafat is "a beast with hair", or Yitzak Shamir pronouncing that Arabs are a "plague of locusts", be regarded as any less publicly anti-Semitic?

In my own personal experience, the above kind of Middle East tête-à-tête has had horrific consequences. The language of anti-Semitism can be a deadly, double-edged sword.

When the late Hamas leader, Dr 'Abdul 'Aziz Rantisi, told me in an interview that suicide was forbidden in Islam, but that "when they [the Israelis] stop killing our children, we’ll stop killing theirs," I was shocked.

But then Dan Halutz, a former IDF chief-of-staff, had refused in Ha’aretz newspaper to call Palestinians "innocent civilians", bizarrely persisting with "uninvolved civilians" instead. His chilling reply to innocent bystanders being killed in Israeli operations was almost identical to Rantisi’s:

"…I am very sorry about innocent children who are killed. But anyone who sets out to murder children in Israel has to take into account that [his] children are liable to be killed [too]…"

After one particular visit to Palestine/Israel after the 2000 Intifada, I had had to seriously ask myself whether the conversation between the sons of Abraham had become so debased we now had justify killing children. I felt deeply that all of us had to disengage quickly from this hateful dialogue in the interest of lucid thought, and for the sake of future generations.

But how? It was a depressing moment. If people couldn’t even speak to each other, there was little hope. Through despair and self-doubt, I consulted the Qur’an. Had our anti-Jewish rhetoric and inflated language derived somewhere from creed?

The Holy Book mentions the Bani Isra’il, the Jews, more than twenty times. Qur’anic verses are interpreted according to two principles: 'am (general) and khass (specific). General verses become rulings. Specific verses, which refer to specific historical instances, don’t.

The Qur’anic verses concerning Jews spoke of reminders of God, of favors, of broken covenants, of the consequences of disputing Sacred Law, of Moses and of the human condition. And more pertinently, the verses were overwhelmingly specific.

In other words, there was no Qur’anic decree permitting me to dishonor Jews. Together with Christians and ancient Sabians, they were to be regarded as "People of the Book", a people worthy of esteem.

Prophetic example spoke only of the same. Muhammad [SAW] honored the Jewish tribes in Medina, his capital, and only acted against them when they broke pacts and agreements.

Traditions reveal that a young Jewish boy used to accompany Muhammad [SAW], that the Rabbi Mukhairiq fought with him in battle, that he married a Jewish woman and that even his suit of armor was borrowed from a Jew. And when a Jewish funeral bier passed by, he stood up out of respect, telling his Companions that the dead man was a son of Adam too.

A brief examination of Jewish commentary was equally illustrative. The Babylonian Talmud revealed that gentiles had to be honored by Jews. Poor gentiles had to receive charity and their sick had to be visited. Understood in proper context as an interpretation of G-d’s word, the Talmud evinced no hostility to Muslims (or Christians) whatsoever.

If the holy traditions spoke with such eloquent nobility, and if authentic religion was not the root of the problem, I had to ask what had gone wrong with Muslim-Jewish relations. What had fostered the inflated language of hatred and calumny so characterizing the discourse today? The sorry answer screamed from the page: political Zionism.

Prof Cotler was right. Israel had become the focus of anti-Semitism, but – as I’ve already explained – for reasons of self-imposed conspiracy and political obduracy on humanitarian issues. Yes, indeed, the canary is singing in the mineshaft of evil, but not for the reasons the honorable Prof Cotler thinks it is.

-Shafiq Morton is a Cape Town based photo-journalist, author and radio show host. He contributed this article to PalestineChronicle.com.

:: Article nr. 54031 sent on 07-may-2009 09:52 ECT