REGIME CHANGE INC. (FROM PLAN B TO C) ZIONIST, NEOCONS, GLOBALISTS AT ''U.S.I.P.'' DICUSS ''SYRIA THE DAY AFTER'' (REGIME CHANGE)

The U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) brought Syrian opposition members together on Thursday (10/4) to discuss the Day After Project, an eight-month effort to plan for a post-Assad Syria, coordinated by USIP and created by a group of 50 academics and opposition members. Although the report was released in August, this was the first presentation the report to the U.S. public.

The project was divided into working groups, and each panelist focused their remarks on their respective sections.

Amr al-Azm introduced the report and briefly discussed the Economic and Soc
ial Reconstruction working group,

Afra Jalabi spoke on the Transitional Justice working group, Murhaf Jouejati focused on security sector reform, Rafif Jouejati represented the Economic and Social Reconstruction group, and Rami Nakhla of USIP discussed the Executive Committee. Steven Heydemann, Senior Adviser for Middle East Initiatives at USIP, introduced the panelists and served as moderator.

For full event notes, continue reading or click here for a PDF.




Steven Heydemann introduced the general structure of the report and stressed that it is not an aspirational document, but a practical guideline for the regions of Syria already under the control opposition control. Although the authors were not expecting rolling implementation of the plan, Heydemann said this kind of flexibility was emblematic of the report’s continued evolution.

Heydemann introduced the transitional justice section, noting ongoing violence in Syria has increased fear, tribal rivalries, and a desire for revenge, which terrifies Assad supporters. Tribal justice will help assuage fears without falling back on cycles of revenge, Heydemann said.

[ED NOTES:WHOS HE? Steven Heydemann serves as vice president of the Grants and Fellowships program at the USIP "and as special adviser to the Muslim World Initiative

(WHO ARE THEY?A US CONGRESS FRONT POSING AS A GLOBALIST THINK TANK,WHOS MOST NOTABLES ARE MONA YACOUBIAN A ZIONIST, FROM WORLD BANK,RAND CORP. AND CFR) .HE'S ALSO AFFILIATED WITH Syrian Center for Political and Strategic Studies, Advisory Board NOTABLES FROM THERE ARE THE SYRIAN MB PUPPET, KHADAMS DOG WHOS RUNNING NATIONAL SALVATION FRONT IN D.C. ''AMMAR ABDULHAMMID'' WHOS TIED TO NECONS AND ZIONISTS AT HUDSON,NED,HERITAGE ETC..NOW,WHO'S U.I.S.P.? ITS A federal institution created and funded by Congress WHO ELSE IS ALIGEND WITH U.I.S.P.?THE SON OF FATHER OF COLORED REVOLUTION..PETER ACKERMAN Peter Ackerman is on "the U.S. Advisory Council of the United States Institute of Peace." Directors THIS ACKERMAN.. Uprooted Palestinians: Regime Change, Inc. Denies Its Own Existence
ALSO SEE.. RightWeb Group Watch, Report on the US Institute of Peace An in-depth expose of this group and its ties to US intelligence and rightwing "think tanks". ON USIP... ALSO READ.. Washington's Plan B for Syria Operation Peace Institute "Peace Spooks"

Amr al-Azm noted the project sought to answer the question, “what comes next?” The Day After Project originally convened on January 2, 2012 and split into the six working groups to formulate specific recommendations. Al-Azm said the transition must begin now so the opposition can “hit the ground running when Assad falls.” Large sections of “liberated” Syria are already “living and practicing” the report, helping the authors improve the document and prepare a workable plan to roll out across the country when the time comes, al-Azm said.

[ED NOTES;WHO IS HE?WHO DOES HE REPRESENT?ZIO ARAB FRAUD,COMES FROM FIKRA FORUM.. Contributors The Fikra Forum was set up by The Washington Institutue for Near East Policy (or WINEP), which in turn was set up by AIPAC ALSO SEE Fikra: Israeli Forum for Arab Democrats 

Heydemann introduced the transitional justice section, noting ongoing violence in Syria has increased fear, tribal rivalries, and a desire for revenge, which terrifies Assad supporters. Tribal justice will help assuage fears without falling back on cycles of revenge, Heydemann said.

I WRITE FOR A PRO PUPPET
SAUDI MONARCHY PAPER

Afra Jalabi called Syria a “deeply traumatized society” after four decades of suffering and collective punishment under Assad. Disappearances, torture and violence have intensified over the past 18 months, which explains a determination never to return to the old system. Syrians must commit to using rule of law to heal these wounds, and Jalabi said traditional paralegal methods, like tribal mediation, will help. A transitional truth committee should be created to deal with lingering resentments, Jalabi concluded.

[ED NOTES:WHO IS SHE?WHO IS SHE REPRESENTING?SHE WAS 2004 PARTICIPANT IN 2004 Participants Synthesis Dialogues "The Association for Global New Thought (AGNT) convened the third Synthesis Dialogues with His Holiness, the Dalai Lama (HE IS OF COURSE ON THE CIA PAYROLL) The Dalai Lama's hidden past | Green Left Weekly How CIA helped Dalai Lama to end up in exile | Global Research BESIDES THAT SHE COMES TO US VIA WISE MUSLIM WOMENS ORGANIZATION...Afra Jalabi | WISE Muslim Women Known For: Columnist for the Saudi daily Al Yaum(PRO SAUDI GOV DAILY),
Who supports WISE? The Rockefeller Brothers Fund http://www.wisemuslimwomen.org/about/#sponsors   

Murhaf Jouejati addressed security, citing lessons from Libya and Iraq to help avoid a militia takeover, protect sovereignty, and establish an apolitical national police force. “There will be some measure of chaos the day after Assad falls,” Jouejati said, and the shabiha will seek to add to the violence and insecurity. However, many militias already endorsed civilian authority over the security sector, and while some elements of the militias combined with the army and police force, Jouejati stressed the need to totally revamp the intelligence services and Interior Ministry.

[ED NOTES;WHO IS MURHAF?http://elliott.gwu.edu/faculty/parttime_j.cfm (SCROLL DOWN).. Murhaf Jouejati is an expert on Middle East affairs with a particular focus on Syrian politics. He has over two decades of experience researching and working on the political, social, and economic aspects of the Middle East. From 2000-02, he was a resident scholar at the Middle East Institute[ED NOTES:ZIONIST ARABS] in Washington.[ED NOTE;MIDDLE EAST INSTITUTES FUNDING - Chevron Corporation Coca-Cola Company Conoco Phillips ExxonMobil Raytheon
Saudi Aramco Shell DIRECTOR'S CIRCLE - BAE Systems Land & Armaments DynCorp International Kuwait Petroleum Corporation USA, Inc Riyad Bank Northrop Grumman Halliburton http://www.mideasti.org/
[ED NOTES:YES, BIG OIL,PUPPET GULF MONARCHY BANKS AND TOP WEAPONS MANUFACTURERS!!! He has been a frequent guest on NPR[NATIONAL ''PENTAGON'' RADIO!!!

I'M A REGULAR AT A
U.S. FEDERAL INSTITUTION
MASKERADING AS AN
INDEPENDENT THINK TANK

Rafif Jouejati said economic reconstruction will be dictated by immediate needs of hundreds of thousands of returning refugees and internally displaced and widespread devastation of the country’s infrastructure. The concurrent objectives will be to consolidate peace, stop the killing, ensure humanitarian care, build infrastructure for resettlement, empower local communities by creating jobs, return to macroeconomic stability, and dismantle the Ba’athist structure of bribery and nepotism.
Heydemann briefly discussed the strong support for the Day After report, including official endorsements from the European Parliament and the Syrian National Council.

 [ED NOTES:WHO IS RAFIF?SHE IS THE LOCAL SPOKESWOMAN FOR LOCAL COORDINATNG COMMITTEES IN SYRIA(WHY IS SHE HANGING WITH ZIONISTS,NEOCONS,GLOBALISTS?)LOL Rafif Jouejati is the English spokeswoman for the Local Coordinating Committees in Syria, Oust Assad With a Plan in Place - Room for Debate - NYTimes.com [ED NOTE;RETHORICAL QUESTION-WHY IS THE SYRIAN LCC'S SPOKESWOMAN AT A ''U.S. FEDERAL INSTITUTION'' TIED TO PETER ACKERMAN ,WHOS A STAUNCH ADVOCATE OF REGIME CHANGE INC. AND COLORED REVOLUTIONS?LOL Rafif Jouejati (RafifJ) on Twitter
https://twitter.com/RafifJRafif Jouejati. @RafifJ. Activist until Assad is prosecuted & Syria is free. Nothing else matters. English spokesperson, LCC-Syria TURNS OUT SHES ALSO BEEN HANGING OUT WITH? Rafif Jouejati; Ami Ayalon; “2 Days in New York” - CastTV Rafif Jouejati, Spokesperson, Syrian Local Coordination Committee. Ami Ayalon, former director of the Israeli Security Agency known as Shin Bet [ED NOTES:OH WHAT A TANGLED WEB THEY WEAVE,WHEN FIRST YOU MUST PRACTICE TO DECEIVE...KEY WORD HERE,PRACTICE!!LOL




Heydemann briefly discussed the strong support for the Day After report, including official endorsements from the European Parliament and the Syrian National Council.

Rami Nakhla stressed the report is not telling the government what to do, but rather explaining how to do it. He expects continued imput from the Day After Association, USIP, and the Transition Support Network in Turkey. The document is already circulating inside Syria among the various regions, generations, and religious groups. One important key for the transition will be to protect “vulnerable communities,”   Asked to hypothesize on a timeframe for the fall of the regime, the panelists were hesitant to be very specific but each called it “a matter of time.”

Al-Azm said the regime’s resources are stretched thin, but as long as the regime holds Homs and Damascus, Assad can maintain power. He guessed a transition would take place by next summer. Jouejati noted peaceful demonstrations are gaining strength, even in Assad’s hometown, bolstered and defended by thousands of defected soldiers.All panelists agreed a cease-fire is not a credible option due to Assad’s history of broken promises and diplomatic subterfuge.

Jalabi and Jouejati agreed both sides of the conflict must be held to the same human rights standards, including possible ICC hearings after the transition. “We must be better than the regime,” Jouejati said. Jalabi and Heydemann cited capital punishment as among the most contentious issues within the Day After community, especially when it comes to punishment for Bashar al-Assad.

Jalabi said the group held heated discussions over the best way to protect minority rights in the future, with some members advocating for a confessional system of allocated parliamentary seats, although the committee ultimately agreed the confessional systems of Lebanon and Iraq were poor models for building national identity.

Jalabi stressed that Syrian citizenship will be paramount after Assad, adding the international community must find a way to come together to support the transition, reserving special criticism for Iran, Russia and Hezbollah for their ongoing support of the regime. Jouejati and Jalabi concluded by reiterating that the regime is on its last legs, making the Day After Project all the more important.

[ED NOTES:ON THAT NOTE, I HOPE YOU ENJOYED TODAYS SHOW, A MENSTRUAL SHOW OF CONSPIRING PARTIES REPRESENTING, NOT SYRIAS INTERESTS BUT RATHER THE ZIONISTS,NEOCONS,GLOBALISTS,AND OUT RIGTH NEOCOLONIAL POWERS,STAY TUNED UNTIL THE NEXT EPISODE,I'M YOUR ANCHOR

ALI ALVES,SEE YOU NEXT TIME..

ALI ALVES,SEE YOU NEXT TIME..

 

Posted byNysoulcontrolla aka Aliat12:43 PM

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Tunisian 'suspects' in the Benghazi killings, arrested in Istanbul ...

FLC

Oh what a hub Turkey has become! WHY did they fly to Turkey? We venture a guess: To enter Syria & proceed with killing!

[Bloomberg] "... The suspects, identified as Tunisians, were detained late yesterday as they attempted to enter the country with fake passports, Kanal D said.Abunaker Feraz of Benghazi, who lived near the base of the Islamist group suspected of carrying out the attack, said on Sept. 22 that, “Ansar al-Shariah includes someone from Afghanistan, someone from Tunisia, someone from Libya.”
Turkish police were questioning the suspects, Kanal D said. It was not clear whether the suspects might be extradited to Libya or the U.S., Kanal D said. Turkish authorities were not available for comment...."

The Calling

Lauren Booth Story

 

Call to Prayer in Church 



 
Call to prayer 



A view on the Qur'an

Qur'an Recitation

Danny Ayalon and the Jewish refugee fallacy

By Daniel Haboucha

The Israeli government has recently launched a campaign to win international recognition for the plight of the approximately 700,000 Arab Jews, or Mizrahim, who fled their homes during the 20-odd-year period following Israel's establishment in 1948. Speaking with much fanfare at a symposium hosted by Israel's UN delegation in New York last week, Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon stated that there will be no peace (between Israel and the Palestinian Authority) until the Arab League compensates these Jewish refugees. He has indicated that abandoned Palestinian holdings in Israel might be somehow balanced against abandoned Jewish holdings in Arab countries. The Israel lobby in the US and Canada — including all of the usual suspects — has enthusiastically jumped on the bandwagon. Comparing the expulsion of Jews from Arab countries to the expulsion of Palestinians from Israel, Alan Dershowitz proclaimed, "The situation faced by Jews in Arab countries was much worse than that faced by Palestinians in Israel."

My father and his entire family were forced to leave Egypt in the early 1960s, abandoning their community, their country of birth, and much of their property. Their traumatic uprooting after centuries of life in the Middle East is an egregious example of systemic religious persecution, and one that unquestionably merits redress. Yet, efforts to equate my "plight" today with the plight of a Palestinian of my age who grew up in a refugee camp (mere kilometers from my beautiful Jerusalem apartment) are manifestly absurd.

The first immediately obvious question is, why is this happening now? Why is the government of Israel suddenly seeking to reopen an issue that has been closed for the better part of a century? And why has it consistently refused to pursue such claims in the past, despite decades of lobbying by a group calling itself the World Organization of Jews from Arab Countries?

I believe there are two answers to this question, the first pragmatic and the second ideological.
1. Victims of Zionism

Israel, through its entire history, has maintained a position of non-responsibility for the creation of the Palestinian refugee problem. The official Israeli narrative, as stated in a Ministry of Foreign Affairs publication, is that the Palestinian refugees left Israel voluntarily or at the behest of Arab leaders. When Yitzhak Rabin wrote a description in his memoirs of how he personally oversaw the expulsion of nearly 70,000 Palestinian civilians from Lydda and Ramle during a week of fighting in June 1948, Israeli authorities went so far as to censor the testimony of their former prime minister. Now, however, in drawing a direct parallel between the Jews who were forcibly dispossessed by Arab governments and the Palestinians, the Israeli government finally appears to be acknowledging its role in creating the Palestinian refugee crisis, with all of the political and diplomatic consequences this implies.

Shining a spotlight on the plight of Arab Jews risks raising some uncomfortable questions about Israel's own role in the creation and perpetuation not only of the Palestinian refugee issue, but also the Jewish one. Israel's founders knew long before 1948 that the establishment of a Jewish state in the heart of the Arab world would spell catastrophe for the Jews living in the region. In declaring Judaism to be a nationality, Zionism transformed Jews in Arab countries from members of a deeply rooted religious minority into "enemy nationals." When made aware of the impending danger faced by the Jews of Iraq in the 1940s due to mounting hostility toward Zionism, David Ben Gurion felt responsible for the harm he suspected would befall them; he referred to these Arab Jews as potential "victims" of the Zionist movement (quoted in Meir-Glitzenstein "Zionism in an Arab Country" p. 140).

The State of Israel in many cases actively precipitated Jewish emigration, sending emissaries to Arab countries in order to persuade Jews to leave. Their methods were not always sanguine. For example, in Egypt, the position of Jews deteriorated markedly in 1954 after a group of local Jews was caught carrying out acts of terrorism and sabotage at the behest of Israel. Israel publicly acknowledged responsibility for this only in 2005. Similarly, Jewish emigration from Iraq accelerated in 1951 after the bombing of a synagogue; this act was blamed at the time (by British consular officials and many Iraqi Jews) on Zionist agents. To my knowledge, there is no conclusive evidence supporting this claim, yet it is lent credibility by the recent admission by a former member of the Iraqi Zionist underground that members of his group did employ such tactics. The passage in Ben Gurion's diary that discusses the report he received on this matter from his intelligence chief remains buried under censors' ink.

Compounding their hardships, Arab Jews who settled in Israel were subjected to deep systemic discrimination, economically disenfranchised, and treated as culturally inferior. This phenomenon is still something of a sore wound in Israel, and is documented extensively in an emerging field of literature.

"You wanted to fit in. You even changed your names. Jojo was no longer worthy. And Farha became notorious. You tasted the Honey; It wasn't always sweet. You spilled the Milk, But didn't cry over it" – Lehakat Sfatayim, "From Morocco to Zion"

2. How many homelands?

On an ideological level, equating Jewish refugees from Arab countries with Palestinian refugees from Israel fundamentally undermines the Zionist narrative, according to Iraqi-Israeli sociologist Yehouda Shenhav. According to Shenhav, a central element in the Zionist mythos is the idea that the Jews who immigrated to Israel from Arab countries did so not out of compulsion but because of their "Zionist yearnings" for their homeland. Zionism's foundational tenet is that Jews are a nation, and that their homeland is not in Egypt, or Ethiopia, or Yemen, but rather in Israel. Mizrahim who settled in Israel were treated at the time by the government — at both a legal and a rhetorical level — not as refugees who had been forced from their homeland, but as compatriots returning to their homeland after years in exile. Ayalon's initiative prompted Palestinian-Israeli member of parliament Ahmed Tibi to ask glibly, "How many homelands do [Jews] get to have?"

Belief in the voluntary and ideologically driven nature of the Mizrahi migration to Israel is not only deeply ingrained in the Zionist narrative, it is also central to the personal narratives of many of those who were displaced, who forcefully reject Ayalon's take on history:

"I have this to say: I am not a refugee. I came at the behest of Zionism, due to the pull that this land exerts, and due to the idea of redemption. Nobody is going to define me as a refugee." – Iraqi-Israeli parliamentarian Ran Cohen

"We are not refugees. [Some of us] came to this country before the state was born. We had messianic aspirations" – Yemeni-Israeli speaker of Knesset Yisrael Yeshayahu.

"I do not regard the departure of Jews from Arab lands as that of refugees. They came here because they wanted to, as Zionists."– Iraqi-Israeli Knesset speaker Shlomo Hillel

"You, who left your faraway village. You, who ascended from your verdant town [...] You left your parents, your friends, and your brothers When you decided to emigrate Out of your love, for Zion!"– Lehakat Sfatayim

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Supremacy of "Peace Now" activists

Peace Now's ethnic-supremacist ideology
  as expressed in their own campaign

Syria / Turkey: NATO leaves Erdogan out in the cold – No Casus foederis

By Jerry Dandridge

– October 5, 2012 –

Syria / Turkey: No Syrian excuse because Investigations are still ongoing.

The news of last Thursday were coined by the events on the Syrian-Turkish borders and it is still sad that Western media only rarely confess that Turkey is the host of a lot of foreign armed fighters at their border to Syria and that the party of Erdogan allows these armed mercenaries and foreign fighters to cross this border as they like.

This Turkish government even supports these religious fanatics and radical fighters in a lot of ways while some U.S. Intelligence agents and other agents from other Western Intelligence services care about the replenishment and distribution of weapons and ammo.

Not to mention that even ambulances are used to transport these armed fighters and that the Red Cross were already in the news because they delivered food to the armed fighters and not to the civilians in a small Syrian village some months ago. That`s really not the way how the Red Cross should act in any case.

Yesterday`s report by the German State television channel ZDF at 16:00 o`clock said clearly that the “Syrian rebels have perpetrated the attack on Turkey”. In the news shows called “Heute in Europa” (“Today in Europe”) it was clearly audible for every consumer at home.



But now, this part of the report about the Syrian / Turkish border problems is suddenly missing. That is truly not the way how the so-called “free press” should act and to re-edit own reports always stinks. Of course, the most Germans will not hear or read about this.

The most Germans do believe what their evening news is telling them and do not put these reports into question. They grew up with the opinion that their “Free Press” is the best press and always near the truth. Of course, this makes a lot very easy for the German media and, in addition, for the German government (eminently).

Even if this statement that “the Syrian rebels were responsible for the attack of a Turkish border village” was just a slip of the tongue, why re-edit it and to delete this small piece? Of course, the editorial office of the German State television channel ZDF did this willfully after the broadcast of this report when they have noticed that they have either made a fatal slip of the tongue or used too much truth in their coverage of Syria accidently.

After all, they have reported that the so-called Syrian rebels have attacked Turkey that is not mentioned anywhere else. But as already stated yesterday, considering the locations and reactions, it is truly possible that the Western-backed armed fighters and Obama-supported al Qaeda groups are responsible for this and that some sides wanted to create another pretext for an NATO alliance case (Casus foederis) to finally enter Syria and to create buffer zones for further military actions.

The Article 5 of the so-called NATO Treaty governs mutual defense in the event of an attack on a member nation of the NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization / some call it North Atlantic Terror Organization).

In addition to the statement that the Syrian rebels are responsible for the provocation against Turkey, the video reports of both German state television channels, ARD and ZDF, have always shown the flags of Turkey, the Syrian rebels (French mandate flag) and some al Qaeda flags, while the correspondent was never willing to explain that these flags are typical flags of al Qaeda groups.
Of course, these correspondents should mention this because the people in the West have a huge claim to hear the truth and these descriptions of flags and symbols. There was no official flag of Syria in these reports. No Syrian flag was visible.

Thus, it seems like the most soil on the Turkish-Syrian border is occupied by these armed groups and that the Syrian army is not really around in some areas. In addition, the place from which the attack on the Turkish border village was launched is known as a place where regularly fights between the Western-/Erdogan-backed fighters and the Syrian Arab Army.

In addition, the easy question “Who benefits from the attack and a possible NATO involvement” should give a correct answer of who could be responsible for this attack and the attempt to create another pretext by a false-flag action.

Made the German media station ZDF a mistake or was it the truth that they have not really told to their audience since the beginning of the situation within Syria? What has caused this reporting? And as if this message should be corrected quickly, one is able to suddenly find some headlines, which make clear that the Syrian government side is responsible for the shelling, of course. In addition to the afterwards edited clip by ZDF.

Of course, for Western media of the democratic states it is immediately clear and certain that the Syrian Arab Army is responsible for the attack of this Turkish border town, even if the investigations are still ongoing and even if there is, to be honest, still no evidence for this. As usually, these Western so-called journalists act like speaking trumpets of their governments that are partly blackmailed by other states and organizations.

Or like France and Germany, which are also interested in the economic benefits after the fall of the Syrian government and the (killing?) fall of the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. But to be honest, also the German and French government knows that this would just trigger more violence first. It seems that some leaderships of Western countries are either stupid or schizophrenic; not to mention that they have already proven that they do not care about murdered Syrian civilians and the truth of events as long as it serves their imperialistic policy and questionable geo-political goals.


(Weapons for peaceful protesters in Syria)

Who cares about evidence and the truth as long as one is able to blame the Syrian government and the Syrian Arab Army? It seems no so-called journalist in the West cares about the truth or facts. The investigation is still ongoing and as al-Jaafari has told, the Syrian side has not yet excused for this. Why not? Because nothing is confirmed and the investigations are continued.

The bulletin news by Reuters were again false and just another propaganda piece. As usually, these media agencies like Reuters, BBC, ARD, CNN, FoxNews, ZDF, and so on, report what they want and are not interested in excuses afterwards, even it was already confirmed that their coverage of this event was false.

In addition, journalists from BBC still act like they are the criterion for true reports and objective coverage. It is questionable if they either swallow unknown drugs or if they are really that dumb and arrogant to not recognize the biased crap that BBC is reporting since months, even since years, about different events on this planet.

Some would say that’s just the general British attitude but this is sure wrong. There are British people on social media networks like e.g. Twitter, who are smart, honest, and able (also willing) to recognize the contradictory and biased reporting. Not to mention that these people also put the dubious sources of these reports into question. (For example, the really strange and ludicrous Syrian Observatory for Human Rights) For example, British people should follow Mr. Charles Shoebridge ‏(@ShoebridgeC) at Twitter.

One has to wonder, who is really interested in an escalation of the situation in the Middle East and particularly between Syria and Turkey. As the Syrian and Turkish people have already proven, the most people of these two countries are not interested in an escalation of their relationships. In addition, it seems like the most Turks do reject the anti-Syrian policy of Erdogan and his party.



The side that is interested in an escalation of the situation between Turkey and Syria is everybody, who has repeatedly called for an “international intervention” in Syria in recent months.

But such a “no-fly zone” (Libya is a very bad and sad example of NATO hypocrisy) and the establishment of so-called “humanitarian corridors” would only provide fields of action for more terrorism, violence, and further military actions against the sovereign and secular state of Syria. In addition, much more civilians would be killed by NATO imperialism that is covered by the phrase of bringing democracy and freedom to a foreign country.

Who brags again and again that he has occupied (ehm “liberated”) the Syrian villages at the Syrian-Turkish border and also brags again and again that he has successfully occupied the whole border area between Turkey and Syria? Yes, it is the so-called “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) that is supported by Turkey, the West, and Gulf States like Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

Thus, when the border area and border towns are occupied by the Western-backed terrorist groups, it is just logical that the launch of the attack at the Turkish border village was carried out by this persons and not by the soldiers of the Syrian Arab Army, because allegedly, according to the “Free Syrian Army” (FSA), there are no Syrian soldiers anymore in this area.

All these questions can be answered. The “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) and Turkey. Why should the Syrian government in this delicate situation, just attack the neighboring country that is a member of NATO and force the implementation of Article 5 and so on..? That would be stupid, and somehow, it would also be suicidal.

The Syrian government or regime is not interested in an open war with Turkey or the whole NATO member states. In addition, the Syrian President, but also other Syrian politicians, have always stated that they have no interested in harming the Turkish people because the Turkish people are not responsible for the violence in Syria and the Turkish people are Syria`s sisters and brothers.

One should consider whether this shelling was not an intended provocation by the Western-backed “Free Syrian Army” (FSA), in order to provoke a war. The armed terrorists, radicals, and religious fanatics of the “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) and the other Obama-backed al Qaeda groups realize again and again that their strategy in Syria has failed. They have no real chance against the Syrian Arab Army and the most inhabitants of Syria do not support these armed radicals. Thus, these armed NATO-backed groups have already changed their strategy a bit and have increased their terrorist acts, bombing, and the inhuman violence against Syrian soldiers and civilians.

With the events of Wednesday, the shelling from Syria at the Turkish border town Akcakale, it is not yet absolutely clear who was behind the attack and what led to the grenades that have crashed into the city. In addition, the fast response by Turkey and the quick meetings do raise questions.

Unfortunately, the whole mass media in the West has quickly condemned the Syrian Arab Army without having any evidence for their headlines or claims. The German State television channel, a German propaganda agency, the ZDF, has then reported in their regularly news show “Heute in Europa” that the Syrian rebels have forced the provocation and were responsible for the attack at the Turkish border town. As stated, the editorial office from ZDF has changed these lines afterwards. The same night of the day of the attack of the Turkish border town, Turkey has responded to this attack with the shelling of Syrian military bases.

A NATO emergency meeting was triggered, of course. On Thursday morning, the Turkish parliament has passed a bill which justifies the retaliation that was already carried out. In addition, this bill allows the Turkish army to carry out attacks on Syrian soil in future. The bill was adopted by a large majority that is 320 against 192 votes. No surprise, Erdogan`s dangerous party has long ago cared about the fact to have a huge support in the Turkish parliament and that “unwanted” generals of the Turkish army are arrested.

Both the Turkish opposition and peace activists have protested outside the seat of the Turkish Parliament. Their protest was abruptly brought to an end when police targeted them with tear gas and used more and more violence against the peaceful protesters.

Nothing new: The Turkish policy (of Erdogan`s party) and Erdogan’s dreams, the Ottoman Empire, at least to partially erect the Ottoman Empire again, do not allow any peaceful protests that are not congruent with Erdogan`s visions and politics.

That Erdogan does not care about some killed Turkish or Kurdish persons at the border area of Turkey was already clear. In recent months, there were regularly clashes between pro-Syria protesters and the Turkish security forces.

Erdogan wants a war to prove that he is a good NATO slave and American friend.

Since the NATO emergency meeting has not yielded to the desired goals, Turkey tried it in the UN Security Council, but Russia has blocked here. Lavrov said that is was tragic and sad mistake by Syria if the “attack was really carried out by the Syrian Arab Army”.

Even if the UN Security Council (UNSC) has strongly condemned Syria, the Panel remains almost incapacitated. Yet the calls on Syria to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of its neighbors sound very provocative and ridiculous because which Western country and imperialistic war monger does respect the Syrian sovereignty? Nobody.

In contrast, they support armed groups and al Qaeda fighters in Syria. Deliver weapons, ammo and other equipment to them; and the nice uncle Erdogan is even the willfully host of armed Islamists, mercenaries and other radical persons. Turkey is involved directly in the Syrian crisis from the beginning.

It now remains to be seen how today’s Friday will be. The waves between Turkey and Syria seem to have decreased a bit. The negotiations must be conducted with the current Syrian government, but unfortunately, the Western-backed gunmen, the religious fanatics, and the Obama-supported fighters of al Qaeda have other interests than negotiations.

It may be that this scenario will continue for a long grueling time, as long as these radical fighters and inhuman religious animals are supported with money and weapons by so-called democratic governments in the West. Not to mention the sons of Judas Iscariot in the Gulf (the regimes of Qatar and Saudi Arabia), who betray their Arab and Muslim brothers since a long time.

Mother Agnes Mariam: Extended interview:

http://www.sbs.com.au/news/video/2286750554/Mother-Agnes-Mariam-Extended-interview

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Iran Warns of State-Sponsored Cyber Attacks

Local Editor

Iranian authorities said Friday that their computer systems are being targeted extensively, and although assaults are waged at the Iranian computer infrastructure are nothing new, the coinciding attacks suggest a cyber-war could indeed be heating up between American entities and the United States’ foreign adversaries. Mehdi Akhavan Behabadi, secretary of the High Council of Cyberspace, told the Iranian Labour News Agency that his country is cracking down on access to content on the Web as investigators try to determine the perpetrators behind the attacks this week that are affecting several sectors of the Iranian e-grid. “Yesterday we had a heavy attack against the country's infrastructure and communications companies which has forced us to limit the Internet," Behabadi told Reuters news agency in an article published Wednesday. "Presently we have constant cyber-attacks in the country. Yesterday an attack with a traffic of several gigabytes hit the Internet infrastructure, which caused an unwanted slowness in the country's Internet.” Iranian official suspect the assault on their systems are state-sponsored as well, while previously, engineers and computer experts have linked at least two types of viruses acting maliciously on Iran’s computer to the United States: the Stuxnet worm and the Flame virus. This time around, Behabadi once again suggests that the assault is more than just a maneuver from a few well-coordinated computer hackers. "All of these attacks have been organized. And they have in mind the country's nuclear, oil, and information networks,” he adds to Reuters. Although the US had not admitted responsibility in either Flame or Stuxnet, the malware has long been assumed to have been developed in cooperation with American engineers. Experts at Russia’s Kaspersy Labs reported last month that they identified three new, similar viruses that they believe are related to the others sent to infect Iran, saying the malware’s coding “fits the profile of military and/or intelligence operations."

Wolf: When Missiles Fall, We’ll be on Ropes

Local Editor

"When the missiles fall, we'll be on the ropes," "Israeli" War Technology Directorate chief Brig.-Gen. Ofer Wolf

The outgoing "Israeli" general warned "Israel" that "In a total war scenario that includes missile strikes, it will be hard for use to realize our logistical capabilities."

"We're not as bunkered as we should be, we don't have storage based on an underground infrastructure, and our supplies are not sufficiently protected," Wolf stated.

In an interview with "Israeli" "Globes", Wolf highlighted that "In time of war, some of the supplies available for the army will used up within days."

"We'll have to produce what we'll need in real time, during the fighting, but we cannot manufacture underground. At the same time, I am also talking about the storage of munitions, fuel, and other critical items for waging war. As far as I'm concerned, there's a lot of frustration, and the situation is worrying," he stated.

 

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

 

ONLY 24 hours prior to the Syria-Turkey border skirmishes, ...

Via FLC

Via 'b'

"... Both Syrian and Turkish authorities “should exercise maximum restraint” since radical members of the Syrian opposition might deliberately provoke cross-border conflicts for their own benefits, Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov said yesterday.  

The diplomat said Moscow has been worrying about the situation on the Syria-Turkey border. Ankara has repeatedly complained of artillery and gunfire spilling over its border and last week signaled it would take action if there was a repeat of a mortar strike on its territory from inside Syria. Turkey has sent a diplomatic note to Syria over the mortar bomb that hit the southeastern province of Akçakale on Sept. 28.... 

“In our contacts with partners in NATO and in the region, we are calling on them not to seek pretexts for carrying out a military scenario or to introduce initiatives such as humanitarian corridors or buffer zones,” Gatilov said...."

 

People ALL over Turkey: "No war on Syria",

VIDEO-PICS-People ALL over Turkey protest against government's approval of millitary action.. chanting "We don't want to be a tool for imperialists", "No war on Syria",
[ED NOTES:SOURCES CLICK PICS THEN SEE ADRESSES



VIDEO OF ANTI WAR PROTEST TURKEY

0:23

TRANSLATE

Taksim'de Binlerce Kişi Suriye İle Savaşa Hayır Dedi - Muazzam Kalabalık 04.10.2012

2:10

VIEW ORIGINAL

LAST DAKKIKA!! LAST MINUTE Syria Turkey War

LAST MINUTE Syria Turkey War! LAST MINUTE Syria Turkey War! LAST MINUTE Syria Turkey War! LAST MINUTE Syria Turkey War!

• NEW

9 hours ago | No views

by RAPTV1453

1:24

Thousands protest in Turkey over Syria mandate

Protesters take to the streets in Ankara and Istanbul after Turkey's parliament approved military operations against targets in Syria following ...

• NEW

1 hour ago

PICS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted byNysoulcontrolla aka Aliat3:28 PM
 

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!