Friday, 1 March 2013

Racist BDS منظمة مقاطعة اسرائيل وتسويق فكرة العنصري

By Daniel Mabsout,

racist

Omar Barghouti – on “White People”

The Use of the terms white race on behalf of Barghouthi is because BDS has a racist agenda. This agenda is expressed in describing the Arab/ Israeli struggle as a Jewish/ non Jewish struggle between Jews and non Jews . THis has for goal to shift the struggle from its real identity towards an assumed religious identity in conformity with the original scheme of the colonizers. According to this new identity Muslims and Arabs are supposed to act as a race or a religion facing another one , on par with their racist enemy . Thus , thanks to the racial nature of the struggle, Israel can acquire the legal status of an Apartheid state that will require anti racist policies , and Arabs can remain confined within a certain religion and lose the human, national and universal dimension of their cause and become alienated from it . The one that benefits from this whole set up is Israel of course . Arabs and Palestinians are at their disadvantage in the racial conlict where they have been drawn and to which they have no clue . This racial attitude displayed by BDS is accompanied by another sectarian attitude that promotes a certain religious sect at the expense of another . What happened with George Galloway was a set up – as he describes it himself – and just the beginning , BDS will slowly reveal more of its racist sectarian designs in the future .

ان استخدام عبارة "العرق الأبيض" من قبل عمر البرغوثي الناشط في منظمة مقاطعة إسرائيل هو بسبب كون المنظمة تحمل أجندة عنصرية . تتجلى هذه الأجندة في توصيف الصراع العربي الإسرائيلي على أنه صراع يهودي\لا يهودي بين اليهود و غير اليهود. هذا من شأنه أن ينقل الصراع مع إسرائيل من أرضيته الحقيقية نحو أرضية دينية إفتراضية تنسجم مع المشروع الإستيطاني البريطاني الأساس...ي . بحسب هذه الهوية الإفتراضية، فإن العرب و المسلمين سيواجهون عدوهم بصفتهم ينتمون إلى دين معين بالتساوي مع الأعداء اللذين يواجهونهم . هكذا ، و بسبب طبيعة الصراع العنصري الديني المفترض، فإن إسرائيل ستكتسب الصفة القانونية الخاصة بالدولة العنصرية التي تتطلب محاربتها اعتماد سياسات مناهضة للعنصرية من قبل العرب و الفلسطينيين. هكذا يبقى العرب محصورين في إطار ديانة محددة و يفقدون البعد الإنساني و الوطني و الكوني لقضيتهم كما يفقدون الصلة المباشرة بهذه القضية
.
إن المستفيد الأول من هذا الإخراج هو إسرائيل دون أدنى شك. أما العرب و الفلسطينيون، فإنهم في ذلك الصراع العنصري خارج إطارهم الطيبعي و لا يملكون مفاتيحه. إن هذا الموقف العنصري الذي تتبناه منظمة مقاطعة إسرائيل بشخص الناشط عمر البرغوثي تترافق مع موقف اخر يتبنى هذه المرة أجندة مذهبية لصالح مذهب معين على حساب اخر. إن ما حدث للسيد جورج غالاواي في حرم جامعة أوكسفورد كان أمرا مدبرا كما وصفه غالاواي نفسه. و ما تلك الحادثة إلا البداية حيث أن منظمة مقاطعة إسرائيل سوف تظهر تدريجيا في المستقبل كافة سياساتها التي تنطلق من مبدأ عنصري يليه موقف مذهبي من القضية العربية و الفلسطينية.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Weekly Report on Israel's Terrorism against the State of Palestine

Weekly Report On Israeli Human Rights Violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (21- 27 February 2013)      
Thursday, 28 February 2013 00:00  
Israeli soldiers arrest a number of Palestinian boys following clashes at al-Jalama checkpoint near Jenin

 
Israeli Forces Continue Systematic Attacks against Palestinian Civilians and Property in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt)
 
The Israeli forces continued to open fire at the Palestinian civilians in the border area of the Gaza Strip
 
3 Palestinian civilians, including a child, were wounded in the northern Gaza Strip.
 
9 Palestinian civilians, including 3 children, were wounded in different shooting incidents in the West Bank.
 
8 of whom were wounded in Qasra village, southeast of Nablus, during a joint attack launched by the Israeli forces and settlers.
 
The Israeli forces conducted 51 incursions into Palestinian communities in the West Bank.
 
At least 56 Palestinian civilians, including 26 children, were arrested.
36 of whom were arrested during incursions, 17 in peaceful protests and 3 from their farmlands.
 
The Israeli forces continued to attack Palestinian fishermen in the sea.
 
A Palestinian fisherman was wounded and fishing boats were attacked 7 times during the reporting period.
 
The Israeli forces continued to use excessive force against peaceful protests in the West Bank.
 
33 Palestinian civilians, including 9 children, were wounded in solidarity demonstrations supporting the Palestinian prisoners in the Israeli jails.  
 
Israel has continued to impose a total closure on the oPt and has isolated the Gaza Strip from the outside world.
 
At least 4 Palestinian civilians, including a child, were arrested at checkpoints.
 
The Israeli forces have continued settlement activities in the West Bank, and Israeli settlers have continued to attack Palestinian civilians and property.
The Israeli forces confiscated 3 truckloads of base course during the establishment of a street in Hebron.


Many Palestinian farmers were denied access to their farmlands adjacent to settlements.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

US PLEDGES $60M TO SNC-FSA IN FINAL BID TO FORCE THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ON THE SYRIAN PEOPLE

Behind the Scenes: Syrian Opposition to Talk with Gov’t without Preconditions
Well informed sources in the Russian foreign affairs confirmed the information that the Syrian opposition is ready to go into negotiations with the Syrian government without preconditions that President Assad should not be part of the process. The Russian sources say that opposition is displaying a more realistic approach after the recent achievements of the governments on both military and political levels.
Friends of Syria Conference .. as seen by Syrians

 

US PLEDGES $60M TO SNC-FSA IN FINAL BID TO FORCE THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ON THE SYRIAN PEOPLE  


Posted on February 28, 2013 by Veritas

US Secretary of State John Kerry arrives for a press conference at the end of a meeting of the 'Friends of the Syrian People (FOSP) Ministerial' group on February 28, 2013 in Rome. (AFP Photo / Alberto Pizzoli)The US will provide the Syrian opposition with $60 million in aid, Secretary of State John Kerry announced on Thursday. The non-lethal assistance will include the delivery of food and medical supplies directly to the rebels for the first time.
“No nation, no people should live in fear of their so-called leaders,” Kerry said in a speech after attending a ‘Friends of Syria’ meeting in Rome.
The move aims to increase pressure on Syrian President Bashar Assad to step down, and pave the way for a democratic transition, Kerry said, adding that the aid is intended to help the opposition govern newly liberated areas of Syria.
“For more than a year, the United States and our partners have called on Assad to heed the voice of the Syrian people and to halt his war machine,” Kerry said. “Instead, what we have seen is his brutality increase.”
كيري في تركيا : رسم الأولويات المشتركة ...محمد نور الدين
But despite the ‘brutality’ comment, Kerry said that Washington will not provide weapons to opposition fighters. The news may be seen as a disappointing blow to anti-Assad forces, who have called for Western arms.
The decision to provide aid directly to the Syrian rebels represents a policy change within the Obama administration. Until now, the US has never directly delivered assistance to opposition fighters. “Given the stakes, the president will now extend food and medical supplies to the Syrian opposition, including the Supreme Military Council,” Kerry said.
US officials said the rations and medical supplies are to be distributed only to members of the Free Syrian Army; the aid will be delivered to the rebels through their military council.
Washington will also send technical advisers to the Syrian National Coalition offices in Cairo to oversee the aid distribution. The advisers will be from non-governmental organizations and other non-profit groups.
The US has already provided $385 million in humanitarian aid to Syrian civilians and $54 million in communications equipment, medical supplies, and other non-lethal assistance to the political opposition.
Syrian opposition leader Moaz Khatib also took to the podium after the meeting, pleading directly to Assad to step down.
“Bashar Assad, you have to behave as a human being for once in your life,” Khatib said. “Enough killing, enough slaughtering, enough arresting. Bashar, you need to make one reasonable [act] in your life time to save this country.”
“The regime has to go. We need to dismantle all the security apparatus,” Khatib said, adding that the Syrian government should be forced to establish humanitarian corridors to allow aid to reach the areas hardest hit by violence.
In a final statement after the Rome meeting, the Friends of Syria deplored the “unabated” arms supply to Assad, likely referring to Russia and Iran, countries viewed as Assad’s traditional allies.
The Thursday Friends of Syria meeting almost failed to materialize: Earlier this week, the Syrian opposition voiced frustration over the “shameful” failure of the international community to put an end to the country’s civil war by refusing to attend the talks.
The leaders finally agreed to attend, after Kerry and his British counterpart William Hague insisted the talks would discuss concrete steps forward.
Meanwhile, the European Union has amended sanctions on Syria to permit the supply of armored vehicles, non-lethal military equipment, and technical aid to the opposition, provided they are intended to protect civilians.
The new sanctions exempt “non-lethal military equipment or…equipment which might be used for internal repression,” and “non-combat vehicles…fitting with materials to provide ballistic protection.”
The decision comes after weeks of negotiations between EU states regarding the arms embargo on Syria. Some member nations were in favor of easing the embargo to help rebels, while others worried that allowing more arms into Syria could fuel the violence.
According to UN estimates, more than 70,000 Syrians have been killed in the nearly two-year-long uprising against President Assad. Some 860,000 Syrians have fled abroad, and several million others have been displaced within the country.
RT

$60 million Syrian opposition aid attempt to ‘make it popular among the civilian population’

كشف الناطق الرسمي بإسم التيارات الإسلامية في سوريا "الشيخ" معاذ الصفوك "ان الفصائل الاسلامية في سوريا كتنظيم القاعدة، وجبهة النصرة، والسلفيين، وكافة الكتائب العسكرية الإسلامية ستتوحد تحت راية جبهة "البنيان المرصوص" بحيث سيكون هناك قيادة مركزية لهذه الجبهة في كل محافظة".
The US has for the first time provided direct aid to the rebel fighters in Syria. John Laughland, from the Institute of Democracy and Cooperation, believes the move is an attempt to prop up a movement that has failed to take root among the Syrian people.
RT: The US is promising direct steps in aiding the rebels… Is this what the opposition wants? Is this help direct enough?
John Laughland: No they want arms, they want even more help. Nonetheless, it is a very significant intervention – $60 million should not be sneezed at, and what the Americans are trying to do is to prop us a project that so far has failed. If we look back to 2011, when Hilary Clinton was calling for the overthrow of Assad, they expected the regime in Syria to fall very quickly, and that hasn’t happened. However great the rebels’ gains may have been, the regime is still fighting back and it shows no signs of collapsing. Instead, it is the opposition that is fractured. Famously, the Syrian national Council is a ragbag of different interests, and one of the people speaking to John Kerry, Moaz al-Khatib, has of course called for direct negotiations with the Syrian government. So, the opposition is breaking up, and there are plenty of forces in the opposition, at least according to my sources in the region, who are bitterly disappointed with the West.

Rebels pray inside a cave in the village of Kfarruma in the flashpoint Syrian province of Idlib near the border with Turkey, on February 10, 2013. (AFP Photo/Daniel Leal-Olivas)
Rebels pray inside a cave in the village of Kfarruma in the flashpoint Syrian province of Idlib near the border with Turkey, on February 10, 2013. (AFP Photo/Daniel Leal-Olivas)
RT: Do you think that Washington isn’t offering more direct help because the opposition is divided?
JL: I think it’s a very significant development, because after all the ordinary Syrian population is suffering very greatly from this opposition, from this so-called liberation. These paramilitary groups cannot provide any basic services, they are not the state. They don’t run hospitals, they don’t run the police, they don’t run the water supply and so on. People are fleeing from the areas where these rebels are located. So as I say, this is an attempt to prop an opposition which is failing on its own terms. It’s an attempt to make it popular among the civilian population. And I am sure that many Syrians who watched the meeting in Rome, and who have seen al-Khatib and many others hobnobbing with John Kerry will draw the conclusion that the opposition is a Western puppet, and that will surely not be good for its image back home in Syria.
RT: Will this aid actually help the rebels win the war?
JL: I don’t know. I think that on paper, it is intended to make them more popular with the civilian population. We all know that arms can get to rebels and indeed are getting to rebels through indirect means, and that they are being funnelled there by American allies Turkey and Saudi Arabia. So, whether the United States itself is sending them is actually neither here nor there.

Syrian rebels gather under a bridge during shelling by regime forces in the northwestern Syrian town of Jisr al-Shughur on January 25, 2013. (AFP Photo)
Syrian rebels gather under a bridge during shelling by regime forces in the northwestern Syrian town of Jisr al-Shughur on January 25, 2013. (AFP Photo)
Ultimately, I do not think that a lack of weapons is their problem. Their problem is their lack of political consistency, the fact that they’ve made them unpopular in Syria itself, and that after all they are not a state, but a rebel group and that they can’t provide living conditions for the people who have come under their power.
RT

In Strange Paradox, Kerry to Back Armed Groups and Speed Up political process

Feb 28, 2013

 
PARIS,(SANA)- In a strange paradox, US Secretary of State, John Kerry on Thursday expressed Washington’s desire to find means to speed up the political process which aims at ending the crisis in Syria, and its desire to help and back the armed terrorist groups in the country.
 
During a press conference with his French counterpart in Paris , Kerry said “The Syrian opposition is in need for more aids to reach areas inside Syria”, yet he didn’t specify the type of aid his country wants to provide after he said in London that Washington seeks to exert pressure on the Syrian Government to change what he called” its calculations on the ground”.  
Kerry claimed that “Washington wants to provide consultation to the Syrian opposition on ways of stepping up a political dialogue that would be the best way of stopping the bloodshed and of protecting the interests of the Syrians.” 
At the same time, American media sources said that the USA is planning to send military vehicles and armors to the armed groups in Syria and to provide the military training to them. 
He added that this requires changing what he called “the current calculations of President Bashar al-Assad”, adding “We are in need for convincing him of this, and I think that the opposition is in need for more help to be able to achieve this issue.”
 
Kerry neglected any stance that helps the political dialogue, and he only promised to back the armed groups in a way that encourages them to continue their criminal acts of killing, terrifying the innocent citizens, and destroying the governmental institutions.
 
R. al-Jazaeri /

US will Boost Support for Syria’s Armed Opposition
 
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

George Galloway speaks for BDS as much as anyone


By Paul Larudee

MP George Galloway is an advocate of and participant in BDS (boycott, divestment and sanctions) toward Israel.

Anyone who participates in boycotting, divesting from or sanctioning anything that supports Israel is part of BDS. It includes those who defend Israel itself but oppose and boycott Israeli settlements in the West Bank, and it includes those who oppose anything and everything that has to do with Israel, up to and including its very name. The critical Zionist's limited boycott of settlement products helps the rejectionist's total boycott and vice versa.

There is no single standard for BDS, no single person who speaks for the entire movement, no wrong way to practice BDS. No one can be excommunicated or found in violation of the movement's principles. All may participate in their own way. The error is to think that there is a formal apparatus or coalition that speaks for everyone.

To be sure, there is a group calling itself the Palestinian BDS National Committee (BNC). However, that group appears to speak less for Palestinians and more for western groups, with carefully crafted policies and statements designed to assure that Zionists critical of Israel are not offended by anti-Zionist statements. Thus, for example, this group was quick to issue a disclaimer that Galloway's refusal to debate an Israeli Zionist did not come within its BDS policies. However, this does not mean that Galloway's action is not a form of BDS and that he is not one of many advocates for this form of protest.

The BNC appears to have started in 2005 as a largely Palestinian movement with the issuance of a statement signed by more than 170 Palestinian organizations. However, it has progressively relied less on Palestinian support and more on western collaboration, including that of "soft" Zionists, to the extent that it modified its statement of objectives to comply with their preferences, without consulting its Palestinian board or the signatories of the original statement. We must therefore conclude that the current BNC represents a different constituency today than it did in 2005 and is thus only a portion of the overall movement.

This is not to say that the anachronistically-named BNC is not performing a useful function by organizing a section of the BDS movement. All BDS efforts are welcome. However, it would be a mistake to imagine that it speaks for the entire movement or even for significant number of Palestinians. Truth be told, it is hardly known in Palestine and neighboring countries, although the accomplishments of the BDS movement of which it is a part are celebrated widely. On the other hand, it is rare for Palestinians in the Middle East to hear about those achievements through the BNC.

We all have a responsibility to participate in BDS even if we may have different reasons for doing so. George Galloway has his own standards for participation, and many applaud him and his integrity, while others may disagree. This does not mean that he is acting counter to BDS, but only to a particular group's standards for BDS. No group should claim to set the standard for everyone else, but all should be transparent about who they are, whom they represent and the processes and motivations that drive their statements and policies.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

"I'm one of the master race chosen ones-you are our slaves"

Video: Israeli settler lecturing Palestinian farmers — ‘You’ll all be our slaves, if you’re worthy, if you behave well’
by on February 27, 2013 


This video, recorded December 27, 2012 by a B'Tselem volunteer, documents a Jewish settler attempting to convince Palestinian farmers, he is the rightful owner of their land using a logic only some people can appreciate. The conversation is taking place after an Israeli High Court decision resulting from a petition filed by the Palestinian owners demanding access to their land which has been obstructed for years.

This is privately owned agricultural land belonging to villagers of Yasuf, located in the Salfit region in the heart of the West Bank. Yasuf land is almost completely surrounded by illegal settlements and outposts, including the radical settlement of Tapuach, site of a Kahanist yeshiva. Yasuf villagers have suffered violent attacks for years and the farmers have been denied access to thousands of dunams of their land since 2001.

First the farmers were violently evicted from their land by settlers, who then placed "an embankment and stones" blocking the access road. Later,  without any legal authorization, the military abetted the settlers by placing a gate across the road. 'Tapuach West' is an illegal outpost near Tapuach, and it's the road between the settlement and the outpost cutting off Yasuf farmer's access.

12 Palestinian land owners from the village filed a petition with Israel's High Court demanding access to their land in 2010. They were represented by Yesh Din. The outcome of that hearing, last November, resulted in this decision:
Deputy President Justice Naor added: “There is a difference between recognizing and tolerating (an illegal situation - H.A.). If the land owners cannot access their land, that is a situation we cannot tolerate. The balance here derives first of all from the starting point, that they are entitled to reach their lands," said Naor. “If there are lawbreakers, it is the duty of the military commander to deal with them. His job is to ensure their access, and if there are lawbreakers he must deal with them. If anyone uses violence the State must confront them.It is the State's job to maintain order."
Ahead of the hearing the State announced that the military commander had recently, following the petition, issued a closed military zone order for a large part of the area to which access requires military coordination. Therefore, a decision was made at the end of the hearing that the petitioners and representatives of the army and the settlement would visit the site together and examine the actual restrictions on access. The sides were asked to submit to the court within 60 days their updated positions about the points of contention there remain afterwards, if any.

Yossi Gurvitz writing for Yesh Din , explains more context in a report of another recent ""price tag" pogrom" against the village on February 18th.
This morning a "price tag" pogrom took place in the Palestinian village of Yasouf. If the name Yasouf is vaguely familiar to you, this is probably because in 2009, it became the target of the most famous price tag attack: the burning of its mosque. It's worth mentioning the response of the Shomron local council at the time (Hebrew): it called the attack an "act of madmen or a provocation," piously adding that it hoped the police would find those responsible. That was two years prior to Shahar Ginossar of Yediot Ahronot reporting that the Shomron local council created the policy of "price tag" and even funded it. The "price tag" people are the military arm of the settlement establishment, the hoodlums used when violence and plausible deniability are necessary. "Price tag" attacks have become so common that they're barely reported; they used to make headlines, but this morning the attack in Yasouf merited barely a newsflash.

The choice of Yasouf as a repeat target of "price tag" attacks becomes more understandable, when you realize that the village is now fighting against the taking over of its lands by settlers, who do so aided and abetted by the IDF. The village dares to fight for its rights, so it gets a small dose of terror, as a reminder of the price of messing not only with the military arm of the government of Israel, but also with the military arm of the settler movement, which is far more ruthless.

In December 2010, the villagers petitioned the High Court of Justice, represented by attorneys Michael Sfard, Shlomi Zecharia, Avishar Lev and Muhammad Shqayer of Yesh Din's legal team. The petition was against the army and the civil administration, demanding the villagers receive access to their lands. Since early 2001, the army prevented the villagers from accessing thousands of dunams of its lands. Later, "Tapuach west" was established on some of those lands,an outpost illegal even according to the government of Israel. "Tapuach west" blocked the villagers' access to their lands, as did the road paved illegally, between Tapuach- a settlement created by Kahane supporters and its outpost- “Tapuach West”. The local council responsible both for the settlement and the outpost? Why, it's the Shomron local council.

At first, the settlers prevented the villagers from reaching their lands with the usual violence, and then the army got involved, and erected a gate which is never open, thus turning what was a lawless land grab into something semi-official. Later, the army declared much of the territory a closed military zone, thus officially preventing the villagers – not the invading settlers – from reaching what is, without any legal contest, their land, from which they live.

Some two years after the petition was filed, in November 2012, it was first debated by the court – hey, it's just some Palestinians robbed of their livelihood, what's the rush? – a hearing during which the justices were sharply critical of the behavior of the army and civil administration. Justice Naor said that "The balance here derives first of all from the starting point, that they are entitled to reach their lands. If there are lawbreakers, it is the duty of the military commander to deal with them. His job is to ensure their access, and if there are lawbreakers he must deal with them. If anyone uses violence the State must confront them. It is the State's job to maintain order."

So, until the government enforces order - which it is loath to do when Jews are involved – the terrorists residing in the Shomron local council will try to make it clear to the petitioners that they are messing with the wrong people. Luckily, the petitioners refuse to bend. To the poor record of law enforcement officials in defending the Palestinians in the occupied territories from the theft of their lands and violence against them – which, again, is basically all the army is allowed to do there, legally – we can add their pathetic inability to capture the "price tag" pogromchiks. Their proven record of inaptitude has already led the local residents to tell us that they are unwilling to press charges, since the treatment of their complaints is a bad joke and the process is a waste of their time.

In that regard, the terrorists – with the quiet support, both by action and inaction, of the IDF, the Shin Beth and the police – have already won.
- See more at: http://www.yesh-din.org/infoitem.asp?infocatid=270#sthash.NaB16nl7.dpuf
This morning a "price tag" pogrom took place in the Palestinian village of Yasouf. If the name Yasouf is vaguely familiar to you, this is probably because in 2009, it became the target of the most famous price tag attack: the burning of its mosque [Ed note: this attack]. It's worth mentioning the response of the Shomron local council at the time (Hebrew): it called the attack an "act of madmen or a provocation," piously adding that it hoped the police would find those responsible. That was two years prior to Shahar Ginossar of Yediot Ahronot reporting that the Shomron local council created the policy of "price tag" and even funded it. The "price tag" people are the military arm of the settlement establishment, the hoodlums used when violence and plausible deniability are necessary. "Price tag" attacks have become so common that they're barely reported; they used to make headlines, but this morning the attack in Yasouf merited barely a newsflash.
The choice of Yasouf as a repeat target of "price tag" attacks becomes more understandable, when you realize that the village is now fighting against the taking over of its lands by settlers, who do so aided and abetted by the IDF. The village dares to fight for its rights, so it gets a small dose of terror, as a reminder of the price of messing not only with the military arm of the government of Israel, but also with the military arm of the settler movement, which is far more ruthless.
In December 2010, the villagers petitioned the High Court of Justice, represented by attorneys Michael Sfard, Shlomi Zecharia, Avishar Lev and Muhammad Shqayer of Yesh Din's legal team. The petition was against the army and the civil administration, demanding the villagers receive access to their lands. Since early 2001, the army prevented the villagers from accessing thousands of dunams of its lands. Later, "Tapuach west" was established on some of those lands,an outpost illegal even according to the government of Israel. "Tapuach west" blocked the villagers' access to their lands, as did the road paved illegally, between Tapuach- a settlement created by Kahane supporters and its outpost- “Tapuach West”. The local council responsible both for the settlement and the outpost? Why, it's the Shomron local council.
At first, the settlers prevented the villagers from reaching their lands with the usual violence, and then the army got involved, and erected a gate which is never open, thus turning what was a lawless land grab into something semi-official. Later, the army declared much of the territory a closed military zone, thus officially preventing the villagers – not the invading settlers – from reaching what is, without any legal contest, their land, from which they live.
Some two years after the petition was filed, in November 2012, it was first debated by the court – hey, it's just some Palestinians robbed of their livelihood, what's the rush? – a hearing during which the justices were sharply critical of the behavior of the army and civil administration. Justice Naor said that "The balance here derives first of all from the starting point, that they are entitled to reach their lands. If there are lawbreakers, it is the duty of the military commander to deal with them. His job is to ensure their access, and if there are lawbreakers he must deal with them. If anyone uses violence the State must confront them. It is the State's job to maintain order."
So, until the government enforces order - which it is loath to do when Jews are involved – the terrorists residing in the Shomron local council will try to make it clear to the petitioners that they are messing with the wrong people. Luckily, the petitioners refuse to bend. To the poor record of law enforcement officials in defending the Palestinians in the occupied territories from the theft of their lands and violence against them – which, again, is basically all the army is allowed to do there, legally – we can add their pathetic inability to capture the "price tag" pogromchiks. Their proven record of inaptitude has already led the local residents to tell us that they are unwilling to press charges, since the treatment of their complaints is a bad joke and the process is a waste of their time.
In that regard, the terrorists – with the quiet support, both by action and inaction, of the IDF, the Shin Beth and the police – have already won.  
I'm wondering if perhaps the discussion taking place in the video last December was as a result of the decision, at the behest of the court, to "visit the site together"?
Now, you listen to me. Soon the Messiah will come. He'll be here any minute. You understand this well. It's also written in the Koran. When the Messiah comes, you'll be our slaves.
Wrap your head around that.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

From Prison And Exile To Power

uuuuuuuu



The phenomenon of promoting leaders on behalf of the world order goes back to Nelson Mandela whereby the freedom fighter who was sentenced to jail and had spent a good deal in prison was chosen and brought to power as a symbol of the victory of the Resistance over Apartheid. No doubt that Mandela was chosen carefully when the world establishment decided to abort the revolution that was progressing and was about to cease power. The world establishment decided then to interfere and to strike a deal with Mandela and with those who were ready to compromise . Mandela - in this sense- is a manufactured hero and everything speaks for this truth . The revolution was thus deprived of its victory in favor of a certain settlement that kept South Africa under control.

No doubt that the thing the world order fears most is the unknown , is people and nations acting on their own and achieving autonomy and independence. This is something the World Order can neither stand, nor afford, that is why it has accommodated to revolutions and has even started to conduct and monitor social uprisings . What we have been witnessing in the Arab spring is not any different whereby exiled leaders like Tunisian al Ghannoushi were called to play their role in the whole setting and according to a deal that will keep them under control . The leader brought -in this way – to power will be willing to compromise . Ghannoushi is the Mandela of Tunisia who was rewarded with power against concessions given to the world order in terms of rallying against Syria . As for the Palestinians, something is being prepared for them -no doubt- in some prison or some remote place that will witness the birth of their savior at the hands of the mid wife called the world order. Attention is being drawn to Marwaan al Barghouthi as a possible choice for a potential hero that will serve foreign interests and will be responsible for aborting what ever remain of the Palestinian Resistance under the label of the Resistance itself.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Palestine: Prisoner Torture Ignites West Bank Flashpoints

Palestinian demonstrators wave their flags under a covered passage during a protest in support with Palestinian prisoners on hunger strike in Israeli jails in the northern West Bank village of Araba, near Jenin, on 1 February 2013. (Photo: AFP - Saif Dahlah)
 
Published Thursday, February 28, 2013
 
Ramallah – In the occupied West Bank, protests took a dramatic turn after Palestinian detainee Arafat Jaradat was tortured to death in Israeli custody.
 
Over the past few weeks, ongoing rallies have protested the mistreatment of hunger-striking Palestinian prisoners, but Jaradat’s death escalated events to the point where many are reminded of the first weeks of the 2000 intifada, when hundreds of Palestinians flocked to Israeli army checkpoints, armed with stones and Molotov cocktails.

“In the clashes taking place near Ofer Prison, the youths only call an ambulance when someone is hit with live ammunition,” said a Red Crescent paramedic. “But for those hit by rubber bullets or tear gas, it is simply not possible to deal with all their injuries.”

The paramedic was referring to the sheer magnitude of the confrontation currently taking place with the occupation forces in Ramallah, the old city of Hebron, and in other parts of the occupied West Bank.

While the Palestinian National Authority (PNA) security forces try to stop protesters from reaching flashpoints across the West Bank, several Palestinian factions are seeking to catch up with the angry street, even if belatedly so.

Yet demonstrators chant slogans that denounce the stances of the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Palestinian factions alike. They have called on Palestinians to engage in efforts to save the prisoners, particularly after Jaradat’s death.

The clashes seem to be fiercest in Hebron when compared to other flashpoints, like the Qalandiya checkpoint south of Ramallah and the Huwwara checkpoint south of Nablus.

One protester remarked that “Oslo was just an attempt to force us to travel several kilometers before we could reach the occupation forces.” Indeed, confrontations are now restricted to the entrances of residential conglomerations in the West Bank where Israeli forces are deployed. This is unlike in the past when the Israeli army was present inside Palestinian cities, as well as refugee camps.

Palestinian Prisoners Fuel Protests

Amid both ominous and hopeful talk of a third intifada, the ever escalating issue of Palestinian detainees held by Israel remains the main driver of protests.

The Israeli army conducts habitual arrest campaigns, detaining Palestinians for long periods of time without disclosing information as to their whereabouts or charges. In many instances, lawyers are barred from visiting their clients.

This has prompted Israeli and Palestinian figures to stress that a failure to address the detainee issue would lead to further escalation.

It is in this context that Qaddoura Fares, chairperson of the Palestinian Prisoner Club, has stated that “the Palestinian side has sought to coordinate with the Israeli Shin Bet to contain the clashes, but to no avail, as Israeli politicians are preoccupied with building a coalition government.”

The protesting Palestinian youths are far removed from the statements being made by the so-called peace camps on both sides. They are also unconcerned by the remarks of PA officials about Israel deliberately provoking an escalation prior to US President Barack Obama’s anticipated visit.

Even as the PNA forces seek to contain any demonstrations that could pose a threat to the occupation army, the ongoing protests have redeemed the forms of popular resistance exercised by Palestinians during the first and second intifadas. It is no secret that the occupation army seeks to avoid aggravating the confrontations by steering them away from major roads that link cities together.

In order to contain the crisis, Israeli political analysts have proposed that Israel release a batch of Palestinian prisoners. The Israeli press has also carried explicit calls to spare Israelis a third intifada, and to restore calm to the West Bank.

This article is an edited translation from the Arabic Edition.

 
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Oscar to Hollywood’s “Argo”: And the Winners are … the Pentagon and the Israel Lobby

DateTuesday, February 26, 2013 at 8:17AM AuthorGilad Atzmon
hollywoodForeign policy observers have long known that Hollywood reflects and promotes U.S. policies (in turn, is determined by Israel and its supporters). This fact was made public when Michelle Obama announced an Oscar win for “Argo” – a highly propagandist, anti-Iran film. Amidst the glitter and excitement, Hollywood and White House reveal their pact and send out their message in time for the upcoming talks surrounding Iran’s nuclear program due to be held tomorrow - February 26th. 
   
Hollywood has a long history of promoting US policies. In 1917, when the United States entered World War I, President Woodrow Wilson’s Committee on Public Information (CPI) enlisted the aid of America ’s film industry to make training films and features supporting the ‘cause’. George Creel, Chairman of the CPI believed that the movies had a role in “carrying the gospel of Americanism to every corner of the globe.”

The pact grew stronger during World War II, when, as historian Thomas Doherty writes, “[T]he liaison between Hollywood and Washington was a distinctly American and democratic arrangement, a mesh of public policy and private initiative, state need and business enterprise.” Hollywood ’s contribution was to provide propaganda. After the war, Washington reciprocated by using subsidies, special provisions in the Marshall Plan, and general clout to pry open resistant European film markets[i].

Hollywood has often borrowed its story ideas from the U.S. foreign policy agenda, at times reinforcing them. One of the film industry’s blockbuster film loans in the last two decades has been modern international terrorism. Hollywood rarely touched the topic of terrorism in the late 1960s and 1970s when the phenomenon was not high on the U.S. foreign policy agenda, in news headlines or in the American public consciousness. In the 1980s, in the footsteps of the Reagan administration’s policies, the commercial film industry brought ‘terrorist’ villains to the big screen (following the US Embassy takeover in Tehran – topic of “Argo”) making terrorism a blockbuster film product in the 1990s.

Today, whether Hollywood follows US policy or whether it sets it, is up for discussion. But it is abundantly clear that Hollywood is dominated by Israelis and their supporters who previously concealed their identity. According to a 2012 Haaretz article
“from the 1930s until the mid-1950s, Hanukkah never appeared on screen. This was because the Jewish studio heads preferred to hide their ethnic and religious heritage in attempting to widen the appeal of their products. Jews were thus typically portrayed as participants in an American civil religion, whose members may attend the synagogue of their choice, but are not otherwise marked by great differences of appearance, speech, custom, or behaviour from the vast majority of American”.
This is no longer the case.
In sharp contrast to its past, Hollywood “celebrated” Israel ’s 60th “birthday” [occupation] with a Gala called “From Vision to Reality”. Israeli TV blog wrote of the Gala: ‘Don’t Worry Israel, Hollywood is behind you’. Actor Jon Voight said: “World playing a dangerous game by going against Israel”. Israeli businessman and Hollywood producer Arnon Milchan, was a longtime weapons dealer and Israeli intelligence agent who purchased equipment for Israel’s nuclear program (the book, “Confidential: The Life of Secret Agent Turned Hollywood Tycoon Arnon Milchan,” written by Meir Doron and Joseph Gelman, recounts Milchan’s life story, his friendships with Israeli prime ministers, U.S. presidents and Hollywood stars).

It is important to understand Hollywood not only in the context of a multi-billion dollar industry, but the propaganda aspect of it and as one of the most powerful and universal methods of spreading ideas through visual propaganda. “Propaganda is defined as a certain type of messaging that serves a particular purpose of spreading or implanting a particular culture, philosophy, point of view or even a particular slogan”. With this capability, Hollywood owns the world of ideas on a scale too large and too dangerous to ignore – see this excellent example by Gilad Atzmon – Hollywood and the Past.
Atzmon writes:
“History is commonly regarded as an attempt to produce a structured account of the past. It proclaims to tell us what really happened, but in most cases it fails to do that. Instead it is set to conceal our shame, to hide those various elements, events, incidents and occurrences in our past which we cannot cope with. History, therefore, can be regarded as a system of concealment. Accordingly, the role of the true historian is similar to that of the psychoanalyst: both aim to unveil the repressed. For the psychoanalyst, it is the unconscious mind. For the historian, it is our collective shame.”
As Hollywood and the White House eagerly embrace “Argo” and its propagandist message, they shamelessly and deliberately conceals a crucial aspect of this “historical” event. The glitter buries the all too important fact that the Iranian students who took over the U.S. Embassy in Tehran , proceeded to reveal Israel ’s dark secret to the world. Documents classified as “SECRET” revealed LAKAM’s activities. Initiated in 1960, LAKAM was an Israeli network assigned to economic espionage in the U.S. assigned to “the collection of scientific intelligence in the U.S. for Israel ’s defense industry”[ii].
As it stands, the purpose of the movie and its backers was to push the extraordinary revelations to the background while sending a visual message to the unsuspecting audience – to lay the blame of the potential (and likely) failure of the upcoming negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program on the Iranians — the gun-wielding, bearded Iranians of “Argo” who deserve America’s collective punishment and the crippling, deathly sanctions.

Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich is a Public Diplomacy Scholar, independent researcher and writer with a focus on U.S. foreign policy and the role of lobby group.
 
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

BASHAR AL-JAAFARI: SYRIA NEEDS REAL, UNBIASED ASSISTANCE FROM THE UN Posted on February 28, 2013 by Veritas


Posted on February 28, 2013 by

Al-Jaafari: Syria Needs Real Aids Not a Highlight Inconsistent with Actual Events
Feb 28, 2013

NEW YORK, (SANA)- Syria needs real unbiased aids and not just a highlight on the humanitarian situation that is inconsistent with the precise evaluation and description of what is actually taking place in the country, said Syria’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Bashar al-Jaafari.
 
Al-Jaafari’s remarks came in a press statement following a closed-door session of the UN Security Council on the situation in Syria held on Wednesday.
 
He dismissed as “having nothing to do with reality “the statements made on the humanitarian situation in Syria by UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs, UN High Commissioner for Refugees and UN Secretary General’s Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict.
 
These statements came in line with “the unilateral outlook to what is happening in Syria”, said al-Jaafari, lashing out at the UN representatives for refraining to admit that the Syrian government has actually been cooperative with each one of them, a cooperation that resulted in signing what was called “the response plan”.
H. Said
 
 
 
الجعفري: ما تحتاجه سورية مساعدات موضوعية وحقيقية وغير منحازة.. ما تفعله دول الخليج أشبه بالسينما وماحصل في مؤتمر الكويت بازار إنساني..
أكد الدكتور بشار الجعفري مندوب سورية الدائم لدى الأمم المتحدة أن تركيز الأضواء على الوضع الإنساني في سورية لا يلبي التوصيف الدقيق لما يجري فيها ولايزال بعض أعضاء مجلس الأمن يتجاهل العديد من المعطيات الهامة مشيرا إلى أن ما تحتاجه سورية هو مساعدات موضوعية وحقيقية وغير منحازة إضافة إلى تشجيع كافة الأطراف للانخراط في الحوار الوطني.

وقال الجعفري في حديث صحفي عقب جلسة مغلقة عقدها مجلس الأمن أمس حول الأوضاع في سورية إن ما قاله كل من وكيلة الأمين العام للأمم المتحدة للشؤون الإنسانية والمفوض السامي للأمم المتحدة لشؤون اللاجئين والممثلة الخاصة للأمين العام حول العنف الجنسي في النزاعات فيما يخص الوضع الإنساني لا يمت لواقع الحال بصلة وفقا للأرقام لأنه لايأخذ باعتباره البعد السياسي للأزمة في سورية وهو رهينة للرؤية الأحادية لما يجري في سورية إضافة إلى أنه لايعترف بتعاون الحكومة السورية مع كل منهم وهو التعاون الذي أثمر نتائج إيجابية تمثلت في توقيع ما يسمى بخطة الاستجابة الموقعة بين الحكومة السورية والأمم المتحدة.

الحكومة السورية تتعاون بشكل وثيق مع وكيلة الأمين العام للشؤون الإنسانية فاليري اموس

وقال الجعفري إن الحكومة السورية تتعاون بشكل وثيق مع وكيلة الأمين العام للشؤون الإنسانية فاليري اموس وبموجب هذا التعاون سمحت لـ 11 منظمة غير حكومية دولية تعمل في المجال الإنساني أن يكون لها حق الوصول وإيصال المساعدات الإنسانية ضمن الأراضي السورية وتدرس الحكومة السورية حاليا منح ثلاث منظمات دولية غير حكومية إضافية تراخيص للعمل في سورية كما سمحت لحوالي 111 منظمة غير حكومية سورية أن تعمل في توزيع المساعدات الإنسانية داخل كل الأراضي السورية دون أي تمييز.

وأوضح مندوب سورية أن ممثل الأوتشا وممثلو المنظمات غير الحكومية الدولية والوطنية قاموا بحوالي 200 زيارة ميدانية داخل الاراضي السورية وقال "أنا اتحدث عن هذه النقطة لأن لها علاقة بموضوع "حق الوصول" والحكومة السورية منحت هذا الحق لكافة المناطق داخل الأراضي السورية وذلك إنطلاقا من سورية ذاتها وسمحت دمشق بحق الوصول إلى أربع مناطق في شمال سورية قريبة جدا من الحدود مع تركيا حيث تم توزيع المساعدات الإنسانية لمحتاجيها".

وحول ما تحدثت به الممثلة الخاصة للأمين العام حول العنف الجنسي في النزاعات زينب حواء بنغورا قال الجعفري أنا شخصيا لا أجد مصطلح "العنف الجنسي" دقيقا وأنا أصفه بالجرائم الجنسية ويجب تقديم مرتكبيها للعدالة ولهذا قامت الحكومة السورية بتشكيل لجنة وطنية للتحقيق في كافة الجرائم المرتكبة ومنها جرائم العنف الجنسي ضد النساء والأطفال ليس هذا فحسب بل يمكننا أن نرى في الصفحات الأولى من الصحف الدولية ومنها الأميركية والتركية والبريطانية صورا لأطفال تم تجنيدهم من قبل المجموعات الإرهابية المسلحة للمشاركة في القتال وهذا يعني أن هناك أبعادا أخرى للأزمة يجب علينا أن ناخذها بعين الاعتبار.

هناك برنامج سياسي غير أخلاقي يتاجر بالوضع الإنساني للاجئين السوريين

وأشار الجعفري إلى أن التركيز على البعد الإنساني لا يرتبط بالواقع لأن هناك برنامجا سياسيا غير أخلاقي يتاجر بالوضع الإنساني للاجئين السوريين من ناحية تنظيم مؤتمرات دولية يمكن تسميتها بمؤتمرات دولية إعلامية فقط يتم فيها تقديم تعهدات وتبرعات لمن يسمون باللاجئين وهذا أمر غير لائق أخلاقيا.
وقال الجعفري: سأعرض عليكم وثيقة من الأوتشا حيث يمكن أن نرى قيمة التبرعات الفعلية وقيمة ما تم دفعه وهو مقدار ضئيل جدا من مبلغ مليار ونصف المليار دولار التي قوبلت بالتصفيق في مؤتمر الكويت حيث تلقت الأوتشا وفقا لآموس نفسها حوالي 200 مليون دولار فقط.
وأضاف مندوب سورية الدائم إنه وفقا لخطة الاستجابة الوطنية والمبالغ التي يجب أن تخصص للمساعدات الإنسانية داخل سورية والتي تعادل 519 مليون دولار تم دفع ما يعادل 20 بالمئة منها فقط وفيما يتعلق بخطة الإستجابة الإنسانية المخصصة للاجئين السوريين خارج سورية والتي تعادل مليار دولار وفقا للأوتشا حصلت الأوتشا فقط على 19 بالمئة موضحا أن هذه الأرقام تظهر أن ماحصل في الكويت كان عبارة عن بازار إنساني فقط للإعلام ومجالا للتبجح لدول الخليج التي تدعي أنها تهتم بالوضع المأساوي للاجئين السوريين خارج سورية أو النازحين داخلها.

وبين الجعفري أن الكويت والسعودية والإمارات العربية تعهدت كل منها بـ 300 مليون دولار وفي نفس اليوم وبينما كان المؤتمر مازال منعقدا سحبت السعودية تعهداتها وكذلك الإمارات والكويت التي لم تدفع ما وعدت به " هذه أشبه بالسينما" معيدا إلى الأذهان ماتم الحديث عنه من تخصيص مبلغ 4 مليارات ونصف المليار دولار كتبرعات للفلسطينيين في غزة بقمة شرم الشيخ ولم يتم دفع أي من هذا المبلغ للفلسطينيين حتى مدارس الأونروا التي تم تدميرها من قبل اسرائيل في غزة لم يتم إعادة بناؤها حتى الآن.
وقال الجعفري: لهذا نحتاج أن ننظر إلى الصورة بأكملها وبشكل إيجابي.. نعم لدينا وضع إنساني في سورية ولدينا أزمة إنسانية ونحتاج للمساعدة من الأمم المتحدة ووقعنا إتفاقا مع الأوتشا ونتمنى للأوتشا النجاح.. كل هذا صحيح لكن علينا جميعا أن نلتزم بقرار الجمعية العامة 46-182 الذي يحترم سيادة سورية وغيرها من الدول عند توزيع المساعدات الإنسانية.. نحن نطلب هنا فقط أن نعمل في ظل هذا القرار.
وفي رد على سؤال حول دور مجلس الأمن تجاه ما يجري في سورية أجاب مندوب سورية إن تركيز الأضواء على الوضع الإنساني في سورية لا يلبي التوصيف الدقيق لما يجري فيها مذكرا أن بعض أعضاء مجلس الأمن حتى الآن وبعد مضي سنتين لا يزالون يتجاهلون العديد من المعطيات الهامة مشيرا في هذا الصدد إلى إرسال الحكومة السورية لمجلس الأمن حتى الآن نحو300 رسالة مليئة بالمعلومات وأحدها يتعلق بتزويد مجلس الأمن بأسماء 143 إرهابي أجنبي مع جنسياتهم وتاريخ دخولهم إلى سورية قادمين من حدود مجاورة وطلبت تعميمها بشكل فوري وتم ذلك فقط قبل ثلاثة أيام حيث استغرقت رسالة واحدة ثلاثة شهور لتعميمها كوثيقة رسمية مع أنها تتضمن وقائع وأسماء.
العديد من الدول التي اجتمعت في مؤتمر الكويت هي سبب معاناة السوريين
ولفت الجعفري إلى أن وكالة رويترز نشرت اليوم خبرا مفاده أن هناك شحنات من الأسلحة المتطورة وصلت للمجموعات الإرهابية المسلحة عبر تركيا كما ذكرت صحيفة نيويورك تايمز أن هناك شحنة من الأسلحة من كرواتيا مولتها السعودية وصلت للمجموعات الإرهابية المسلحة عبر الأردن مؤكدا أن هذه الوقائع ليست من وكالة الأنباء السورية وعلى مجلس الأمن أن يركز على هذه الوقائع والنقاط ليقف على حقيقة مايجري في سورية.
وردا على سؤال حول المساعدات التي تقدمها السعودية والإمارات والكويت للمعارضة قال الجعفري إن العديد من الدول التي اجتمعت في مؤتمر الكويت هي سبب معاناة السوريين لأنها ذاتها الدول التي تدعم وتمول وتسلح وتدرب الإرهابيين وتعطيهم التغطية الإعلامية لتصويرهم كمقاتلين من أجل الحرية وليس كإرهابيين يدمرون البنية التحتية والمشافي والمدارس والمطارات ويهاجمون الطيران المدني والبعثات الدبلوماسية.
وبشان مؤتمر مايسمى " أصدقاء سورية" الذي سيعقد في روما والتقارير التي تقول بأن الإدارة الأميركية تعهدت بتقديم مساعدات غير قاتلة للمعارضة قال مندوب سورية الدائم لدى الأمم المتحدة إن ما تحتاجه سورية هو مساعدات موضوعية وحقيقية وغير منحازة كما تحتاج لتشجيع كافة الأطراف للانخراط في الحوار الوطني وتحتاج أن يتم إقناع من يقوم بدعم المسلحين بالجلوس إلى طاولة الحوار وحل الوضع في سورية بموجب قراري مجلس الأمن ووفقا لـ "بيان جنيف".. ليس علينا أن نبدأ من الصفر من خلال اجتماعات أخرى بينما لدينا الأرضية جاهزة.. السوريون لايحتاجون مؤتمرات أخرى كمؤتمر روما إذا كانوا فعلا أصدقاء للشعب السوري فعليهم الاهتمام بكل الشعب السوري.
من يريد الحوار لايضع شروطا مسبقة
وجوابا على سؤال حول شرط "تنحي الرئيس قبل البدء بالحوار" قال الجعفري " إن هذا طرح ساذج فمن يريد الحوار لايضع شروطا مسبقة فهو يسمى حوارا وطنيا وليس حوارا وطنيا بشروط مسبقة" مؤكدا أن الحاجة إلى تسوية سياسية تتطلب الجلوس إلى طاولة المفاوضات والتحدث إلى من يختلف معك في الرأي.
وحول الجلوس إلى طاولة الحوار مع المعارضة المسلحة واستعداد مندوب سورية الدائم لدى الأمم المتحدة للجلوس معها في الولايات المتحدة قال الجعفري إن التفاوض يتم من خلال وفود مخولة فالحكومة كلفت وزير المصالحة الوطنية والوزير هو من يجلس على طاولة الحوار وعلى الطرف الآخر أن يخول ممثلين عنه مبينا أن المسألة هي أن يقبل هذا الطرف مبدأ الحوار ومبدا التسوية السلمية ومبدأ وقف العنف والإجرام واحترام السيادة وعندها سيكون هناك وفد من الحكومة ووفد من المعارضة يتفقان حول برنامج العمل الذي يلبي تطلعات الشعب السوري وهذا ماكان وراء المشروع والبرنامج السياسي الذي طرحته الحكومة منذ فترة.. " على السوري ان يحاور السوري" وهذا مانصت عليه مبادرات كوفي عنان والأخضر الإبراهيمي وهي مبادرة يقودها السوريون أنفسهم.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Thursday, 28 February 2013

Sayyed Nasrallah Refutes Rumors, Stresses: “We Won’t Be Dragged into Sedition”

 


 
Marwa Haidar
 
AsSayyed Nasrallah his eminence appeared on Wednesday on al-Manar TV to refute rumors over his health condition, Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah warned that there have been sides who seek sectarian sedition in Lebanon.

Sayyed Nasrallah said that there are clerics among the Sunni sect, who have been adopting an escalating rhetoric, wondering if "their incitement is based on realities or illusions."
His eminence also tackled the electoral law, calling for discussing the proposal of a law based on single district with proportional representation.

Hezbollah S.G.said that there is an armed campaign aimed to displace people who live in villages located in the Syrian border, stressing that these people have been defending themselves.

Sayyed Nasrallah also urged the government to convene in order to discuss the ranks and salaries system and to settle this issue.

“SOME SEEK SECTARIAN SEDITION AMONG MUSLIMS

Sayyed Nasrallah warned that some people have been seeking sectarian sedition, noting that there are clerics among Sunni sect who have been adopting an inciting rhetoric.

“There are sides that are driving sectarian strife, especially between Sunnites and Shiites, in an accelerated manner,” Sayyed Nasralla addressed his people on al-Manar TV

“There are MPs and clerics among the Sunni sect who have been adopting an escalating rhetoric,” his eminence said, wondering: “This incitement is based on realities or illusions?”

“If it’s based on realities let us sit together and talk about it in order to solve the problem. But is it is based on illusions, let us know who has been seeking sedition in our country.”

Sayyed Nasrallah also stressed that “we must not sit and simply watch who are seeking strife, and this needs wise people who intervene in a bid to reconcile between the sides who are at odds.”
“I say to those who simply watch any dispute that the “strife is not in favor of any side in this country.”

“WRONG CALCULATIONS”

On the issue of Sidon and the threats made by Imam of Bilal Bin Rabah Mosque Sheikh Ahmad Assir, Sayyed Nasrallah warned against “wrong calculations”, but stressed that Hezbollah “won’t be dragged into sedition.”

Asking whether the residing in Sidon needs permission from one side or another, Syyed Nasrallah said: “we were engaged in Sidon’s liberation… and after the Israeli withdrawal from the city we have apartments, houses, mosques and complexes there since 20 or 25 years.”

“We didn’t have an office near a Mosque, however this mosque was built near the office,” Sayyed Nasrallah said referring to Bilal Bin Rabah Mosque.

Assir threatened last week that a Hezbollah office near his mosque should be evacuated by Hezbollah members. However Sayyed Nsrallah stressed that this office was established even before Bilal Bin Rabah Moasque was built.

“ORTHODOX PROPOSAL OR SINGLE DISTRICT WITH PROPRTIONAL SYSTEM”Sayyed Nasrallah

Speaking about the electoral law, Sayyed Nasrallah called to seriously discuss the law of single district with proportional representation.

His eminence said that this proposal is the most appropriate electoral law since it goes beyond the negative points of the Orthodox Gathering proposal.

He also said that “there are foreign and local powers that have been driving for delaying the elections.

Responding to claims that Hezbollah favors postponing elections, Sayyed Nasrallah stressed “it’s of Hezbollah’s interest to hold the elections on time.”

However, he said that some sides prefer to delay the elections, as they bet on the fall of the Syrian regime.
“Who wants to delay the elections, let him announce his intention and causes without accusing others of being interested in the delay.”

ARMED CAMPAIGN AGAINST LEBANESE BORDER VILLAGES

Sayyed Nasrallah indicated there has been an armed campaign against some Lebanese villages on the Syrian border.

“These campaigns are aimed at displacing the people of these villages. These people hold weapons to defend themselves, and their land.”

In this context, Hezbollah S.G. said “it is their right to defend themselves,” but stressed that they should not attack any one.

Syrian armed opposition has occupied some Shiite villages in Syria, as it displaced its people whose some of them are now seeking shelter in the region of Bekaa and Hermel.”

ISSUES OF RANKS AND SALARIES, KIDNAPPING

On the other hand, Sayyed Nasrallah urged the government to settle ranks and salaries system, calling for a quick and exceptional session in which this issue will be approved and then to refer it to the Parliament.

Meanwhile, his eminence tackled the kidnapping Lebanon has been witnessing since weeks ago, considering this issue a dangerous one.

He called for a national cooperation to confront this phenomenon, stressing that the state, security body and the judicial authority should hold their responsibilities in this problem.
Source: Al-Manar Website
27-02-2013 - 20:19 Last updated 27-02-2013 - 22:03

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!