I came across the following article yesterday, and I wondered why people, through they know, or can deduce the actual facts, they still twist the facts in a way that may seem convincing, but, of course, to the fable minded and/ or apologists and biased, which are regrettably too many out there.
"Israel had no choice over Gaza flotilla: Flotilla activists had ample opportunity to defuse the situation before the IDF arrived – instead they decided on violence."
Israel had no choice...this is ridiculous! Of course they had multiple choices, but opted, as they always did, to aggression; a natural Israeli way of thinking since Israeli craniums contain nothing but criminality forged over centuries by the instructions of the Talmud; a book written by Satanic hands.
"Seth Freedman - guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 1 June 2010 14.30 BST"
"The tragic events of Monday morning are, rightly, sending shockwaves around the world – but blaming the IDF alone for the carnage flies in the face of the facts.Video footage from an on-board news agency clearly shows a premeditated attack on Israeli soldiers, with activists using iron bars and other weapons to assault the troops and giving the IDF carte blanche to respond with force against them."
It is true that a video footage shows all the above. Nevertheless, this footage proves nothing but a fight between the activists and the IDF. First of all, the IDF has no right to board a ship in the international waters whatever the circumstance are. Secondly, the people on the ship have all rights to attack the invaders. If I wake up early in the morning to find someone in my house, I'll do my maximum best to incapacitate him , or act as a coward. Did the IDF expect the activists to chose the later?!
_______________
"That there was a Nobel peace prize laureate on board is irrelevant. That there were electric-powered wheelchairs among the cargo is irrelevant. That Gazans are suffering immensely from the years'-old siege of their land is unpalatable and unfortunate –
Is this "Seth freedman" a lunatic. The above is totally important and absolutely relevant, and palatable by anybody who has commonsense. It shows motives of actions of either side, signs indicative of the purpose of the mission and this particular incident. If Mr. Seth fails to see that, then he is totally stupid or biased.“Israel had given countless warnings to the activists not to proceed with their trip without first allowing the freight on their ships to be checked; Israel had repeatedly offered to allow the aid in as long as the activists handed it over to the army to be inspected."
In fact, Israel has no business to do with a ship in the international water, unless we're still living the piracy period of the olden days. Warned or not, Israel is not the king of the mid seam or the guardian thereof. It is a fact that the ship was attacked while it was still in the international waters. Why did not Israel wait until the ship sailed in the territorial waters. The above is a blatant lie, a total bias, and crystal-clear piracy."
“At the same time, those supposedly bringing "aid" to the people of Gaza have form for using alleged acts of humanitarianism as cover for weapons smuggling – and Israel has every right to defend its own citizens from the consequences of such illicit transfer of arms. There is not a country on earth that would not take similar steps to protect its people; there is not an army on earth that would not allow its soldiers to respond with force to neutralise a life-threatening attack on their fellow troops."
The above is another Zionist propaganda; a tactic - the Jewish propaganda machine always used - through charges at your opponent to put him on the defensive, and keep him busy so that you will gain time of fabricating more lies, or destroying evidences. Israel could have done what she wanted by waiting until the ship became a target in the territorial waters. But what do you expect from a whore state?!! "The activists who launched the vicious assault on the boarding soldiers knew full well what they were doing. They had issued threat after threat against the IDF in the days building up to this morning's clash, with convoy organiser Huwaida Arraf brashly declaring his group's unwavering dedication to reaching Gaza: "They are going to have to forcefully stop us." Club-wielding assailants might not fit the cute and cuddly image of stereotypical aid workers, but there can be no doubt from the evidence that those attacking the Israeli forces were not the archetype of calm and measured peace activists."
Aside from Mr. Seth's cynical description of the activists way of fighting, what he mentioned above confirms that both sides knew damn well in which way either side was going to re-act, thus confirming my point that Israel instigated the whole incident by their unlawful boarding of a ship outside the Israeli territorial waters. In actual fact, it does not matter whether the activists threw the first punch. Please, give me a break...armed to the teeth, the thieve is already in my house."
"One of the first diplomatic reactions to the deadly affair came from Murat Mercan, a lawmaker from Turkey's ruling party: "I was expecting an intervention. I was not expecting bloodshed, the use of arms and bullets." The official Turkish line is that Israel has behaved in an "unacceptable" fashion, yet – unsurprisingly – not one Turkish politician has had the honesty or courage to lay an iota of blame at the feet of the ultra-violent activists. Without such a sustained attack on the troops, Mercan's predictions of a blood-free intervention would have come to pass: but he, like many others in his position, prefers not to dwell on such minor details if it means having to concede even an inch of ground to the Israelis."
How can you lay blames on people who were in a ship on its way to carry out a noble mission, and woke up to find a whole bunch of pirates on deck, and others descending on ropes to the ship's deck from a a chopper. Who is to blame here; the aggressors or those who are defending themselves?
"Reports have surfaced claiming that an activist tore a soldier's machine gun from his grasp and used it to shoot him with: what might have seemed a far-fetched story spun to improve the IDF's standing over the attack is given far more credence when considered in the context of quite how savagely numerous activists greeted the arrival of the troops on to the ship. Those on board the ship had ample opportunity to defuse the situation in the days and hours leading up to the commandos' arrival: instead, they decided that violence was the best way to play their hand, and given their intransigence, there was only ever going to be one outcome."
WOW, hasn't this guy hear about "the pattern of behavior"? Is this why he wants to isolate this incident from other incidents which are of the same nature (different shit, but the same smell) What a hypocrite this guy is?
"The immediate response of hundreds of civilians in Turkey – attacking consulates, fighting with local police – is another example of the resorting-to-violence mob's myopic behaviour that so impedes efforts to resolve the Israel-Palestine imbroglio using peaceful and diplomatic means. Violence is the stock in trade of extremists on both sides of the Israeli-Palestinian war: settlers and soldiers on one side, militants and terror leaders on the other; pretending that the violence emanates from the Israeli side only is a spurious and senseless way to paint the picture."
This guy is not only ignorant, but he is, or pretends not to know of what is going in in Israel. Israelis are blood-thirsty criminals.
"When Israel's wrongs are brought to light, they deserve condemnation as much as those of the Palestinians, but that does not mean automatically that in any situation the default position ought to be Israel is guilty until proven innocent. In the case of the Freedom flotilla, Israel made repeated efforts during recent weeks to assist the activists in their mission and avoid bloodshed."
Lies, lies, and more lies to be believed by those who are feeble-minded.
"Even during the raid, troops did not fire on those on board at first, instead simply trying to go about their business of inspecting the cargo."
They illegally boarded a ship in the international waters (which shows on whose side's shoulder aggression falls), oh, but they are civilized as they (despite they have raided my apartment) did not throw the first punch. WOW.
"When they were attacked with venomous force by the activists, they were left with no choice but to respond in kind. Those are the only facts that matter here, and all the kneejerk Israel-hating in the world won't absolve the activist aggressors from their share of guilt for the horrific events that unfolded today."
Chairs, iron rods, and the likes can in no way be venomous force against machine guns and commandos who are well trained and have had the control in their hands. I give up...This guy is a certified nut.
Long live, Palestine
"In the wider political context, Israel's government and army are clearly at fault over a myriad of issues, as are the leaders and politicians of Hamas – but what took place aboard the Freedom flotilla must be viewed in isolation in terms of the violence from both sides, rather than used as yet another rod with which to beat Israel simply because it suits certain parties to do so."
Posted by Aadel M Al-Mahdy at
3:22 PM
Uprooted Palestinian
No comments:
Post a Comment