In a joint appearance of “Israeli” and Saudi Arabian officials, the kingdom’s Prince Turki al-Faisal and “Israeli” regime’s Maj. Gen. Yaakov Amidror shared a stage Thursday night in Washington, debating ways to advance a two-state solution between “Israelis” and Palestinians, while also expressing common concerns over the Iranian nuclear deal and growing instability in the region.
Al-Faisal, the former Saudi intelligence chief and ambassador to Washington, insisted that the so-called Arab Peace Initiative, a Saudi proposal to end the “Israeli”-Palestinian conflict that was endorsed by the Arab League in 2002, was the path toward reaching a final-status agreement.
Amidror, a former “Israeli” security adviser to “Israeli” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, urged the Arab world to form an “umbrella of cooperation” with the “Israeli” apartheid regime to bring the Palestinians to the negotiating table.
The Saudi prince repeatedly denounced “Israel’s” presence in the West Bank and said that peace throughout the Middle East would not be realized until Palestinian statehood was achieved. “There has to be a lifting of the occupation,” he said. “The Palestinians have to have their own country.”
“Maybe your optimistic view of the Palestinians is too optimistic,” Amidror replied, criticizing the Palestinians’ unwillingness to negotiate.
On the Iran nuclear deal, both former officials expressed concern about Tehran acquiring weapons capability.
Al-Faisal said the Middle East should remain a “weapons of mass destruction free zone” and that “all options” would be on the table if the Islamic Republic began to move toward the bomb, including Saudi Arabia acquiring its own nuclear weapon capability.
Amidror said he thought Iran would work to build a bomb “toward the end of the agreement. In principle, the Iranians can go nuclear and from the “Israeli” point of view, this is a threat to existence, and we will not let this happen.”
While al-Faisal indicated a level of partnership, between Saudi Arabia and the “Israeli” entity when it comes to regional threats, he circled back to the “Israeli”-Palestinian conflict to suggest it obstructed Arab states’ ability to work with the “Israeli” regime.
“Cooperation between Arab countries and “Israel” in meeting threats, from wherever they come, whether Iran, is better fortified if there is peace between the Arab nations and “Israel”,” he said.
The two also presented similar positions on the situation in Syria, including the reign of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and the rise of Daesh [Arabic acronym for “ISIS” / “ISIL”].
“We all know what a monster Assad is,” al-Faisal told those gathered at the event, emphasizing a collective responsibility for the political and humanitarian catastrophe that has unfolded in Syria. “I blame us all for what is happening in Syria,” he said.
Amidror reiterated the “Israeli” position to remain out of the war in Syria, saying that “”Israel” seeks to avoid involvement in the sectarian conflict sweeping the Arab world,” but that “the best outcome for Syria is to become free and democratic.”
He contended that Syria was evidence that other conflicts in the region had taken a greater toll than the “Israeli”-Palestinian one. “The number of Arabs that have been killed by Arabs is greater than the number of Arabs that have been killed by Jews,” he said.
The two former officials also addressed the US role in the region. Moderator Robert Satloff, executive director of the Washington Institute, asked the panelists to discuss a recent series of interviews US President Barack Obama gave with The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg, in which the president articulated a vision of US retrenchment in the Middle East.
Al-Faisal said the “strategic relationship with the US will remain, from the Saudi point of view,” while stressing the main difference between the two countries was on the “Israeli”-Palestinian conflict. Amidror, similarly, said the difference between the “Israeli” entity and the United States was also “on the Palestinian issue.”
Amidror added that there was “no substitute for the United States of America in the Middle East” and that those “who think other countries can do what the United States used to do is a big mistake.”
Al-Faisal indicated he saw a change in the relationship and the US role in the region and said he believes “there needs to be a reevaluation and recalibration of the relationship.” He also expressed some empathy for the president’s position: “Americans feel too much used to be expected of them. And they shouldn’t feel obliged to take certain responsibilities that they did before.”
Source: News Agencies, Edited by website team
06-05-2016 | 14:45
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
No comments:
Post a Comment