For some, apparently including the younger Hariri, Syria could provide a buffer against this eventuality. Saad has journeyed to Damascus in an attempt to sidle up to Syrian President Assad.
This moves follows closely a rapproachment between Saudi Arabia and Syria.
However, the STL operates independently of any government and Western governments, notably the US and France have firmly resisted entreaties to intercede with the STL.
Moreover, the initial price US officials believe Assad wants Lebanon to pay is a denunciation of the STL and a cut-off in Lebanon's financial contribution to this international organization. This seems to be what the Saudis would prefer as well, say key State Department officials. Says one veteran insider, "The Saudis want to kill the STL. Lebanon is not important enough to them anymore."
What does concern the Saudis the most, is, of course, the Iranian threat. But here too, say US officials, Riyadh has been less than a reliable partner. Says one key US official, "The Saudis -- and by extension, the Arabs -- want the Iranian `problem' solved. But just want us to make it go away." Or as one of his colleagues put it this week,
"We [Saudis] don't want to take any risks. You do it" [Parenthetically he added, "They act lot like Abu Mazen."]
In "solving' the Iranian problem, top US officials believe they have gone a long way, notably with the increasingly burdensome sanctions that have been applied to Iran. Although Iranian businessmen have shouldered most of the burden so far, some analysts say it is only a matter of time before the political elite has to grapple with increasing isolation. "The Iranians were first surprised when we got the UN resolution," argues one key US official. Next, the EU [European Union] expanded them dramatically. Now, we have the Asians, especially the Japanese and South Koreans, cooperating." Treasury, long active in going after banks and businesses cooperating with banned Iranian entities, are now, under the continued leadership of Under Secretary Stuart Levey, become even more aggressive. And even when some in the Administration albeit, a minority, talk of trying again to engage the Iranian leadership in a dialogue, along comes the likes of President Ahmadinejad spinning conspiracy theories ....
Most analysts say Ahmadinejad is playing to a domestic audience. Under attack by key figures in the clerical establishment, he is engaged in nothing less than a struggle for control in Teheran. With subsidies to be ended, there is fear of a public backlash [even though the time line for their elimination could be as long as five years]. And although these officials believe the opposition "Green Movement" is "effectively non-existent" to use a senior State Department words, Ahmadinejad's supporters still attack its leadership both rhetorically and most recently physically with assaults on their homes. "There is a warning there for all who dissent," says one US official. "And as long as Ahmadenijad has the backing of the "Supreme Leader" he will continue to be successful [This official is convinced that Ayotollah Khameini - the Supreme Leader -- still finds Ahmadinejad useful as a "lightning rod" or "foil" for his own hard line views."]
As for the allure of attracting Syria away from Iran's orbit, veteran US analysts consider it a waste of time for the US as well as other more interested parties, including the Saudis and some European governments.
They argue that the Syrians already believe they are on a roll.
Assad, in their view, has already discounted US and Israeli complaints about handing over missile systems to Hezbollah [Survey May 26, 2010]; brought Saudi King Abdallah back to him, kept his relationship with Iran and continues playing politics (albeit with modest success) in Iraq.
For the US to add an approach on the peace process, says this official, "...would only feed his arrogance."
No comments:
Post a Comment