Uprooted Palestinians are at the heart of the conflict in the M.E Palestinians uprooted by force of arms. Yet faced immense difficulties have survived, kept alive their history and culture, passed keys of family homes in occupied Palestine from one generation to the next.
Fourteen years ago, on August 13, 2006, the Zionist occupation committed horrible crime by killing dozens of Lebanese at a residential complex in Beirut’s southern suburb, Dahiyeh. In two minutes, eight buildings turned into rubble when Israeli warplanes threw 23 tons of smart bombs on Al-Imam Al-Hassan Complex.
The massacre took place shortly after the Zionist government announced on that day it had agreed to a cessation of hostilities with Lebanon, in a clear proof that this regime breaks its words and is hostile by nature.
Fourteen years on the war which was full of massacres, devastation and a lot of pain, this entity appears with a new language. Few days after the massive blasts at Beirut Port on August 4, 2020, Tel Aviv lit up its city hall with the Lebanese flag, in a move that was even met by protest inside the Zionist entity.
Moreover, the Israeli regime, which was established on the blood of the Palestinians, offered to send aid to devastated Beirut following the tragedy of the port.
“I expressed Israel’s willingness to send humanitarian aid which must be delivered directly to the population,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told French President Emmanuel Macron in a phone call on Tuesday (August 11).
Netanyahu’s “tenderness” didn’t stop here. The Israeli PM, and out of his “keenness” on the safety of the Lebanese people, told the French president that the arms of the “devil” Hezbollah must be taken out of populated areas across Lebanon.
Such language may deceive some countries like the UAE, which announced on Thursday it was normalizing ties with the Zionist entity, in a move that is expected to be echoed by other Arab states.
Unlike other countries, the honored people of Lebanon will never be fooled. They know very well that all the Israeli moves towards Lebanon are aimed at one goal: Disarming Hezbollah.
Since its defeat on the hands of Resistance fighters in 2006, the Zionist entity spared no effort to reach its goal. However, this enemy has forgotten major fact: The people who witnessed the divine victory in 2006 know very well that the Resistance weapons have been the source of this pride, and they will never accept that the Resistance would abandon its weapons.
The people who rushed to return to their destroyed houses as soon as the cessation of hostilities took effect at 8:00 a.m. on Monday, August 14, 2006 are now more determined to defend their land.
The children who were displaced from their southern towns in 2006 have now joined the Resistance ranks and are well prepared to take part in the game-changing surprise promised by Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah if a new aggression is launched against Lebanon by the Israeli enemy.
Some Arab states may follow in UAE’s tracks, but surely Lebanon won’t be one of them, not only because the Zionist brutality can’t be forgettable, but also because the Lebanese people are still enjoying the divine victory of 2006 and preparing for the day when they will pray, along with the Palestinians, in Al-Quds!
Location: The southern suburbs of the Lebanese capital Beirut
Time: Early 1998
The commander of the Quds Force in Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps, Colonel Qassem Soleimani, who recently assumed his position, visits the military headquarters of Lebanon’s Hezbollah movement. He embraces each of its officers – some have since been martyred, and others are still fighting on the frontlines. It is a very warm embrace between Soleimani and his comrades in arms. The great jihadi leader, martyr Mustafa “Zulfiqar” Badreddine, rushes to embrace the man. Soleimani responds with a warmer hug.
The video clip reflects an exceptional relationship between two revolutionaries, whose joint struggle transcended the borders of Lebanon and occupied Palestine. Syria, from north to south, passing through its desert and levant, is the scene of qualitative achievements and successive victories. It is hard to deny this. But to distort this conception, the Saudi media machine created rumors and lies about the tense relationship between the two martyrs. It held Soleimani responsible for the assassination of Badreddine and accused him of masterminding it.
How can men embracing gunpowder and fire every day – with one foot on the brink of death – possess all this passion? A mujahid recalls the two great martyrs. Those who look closely at their videos during operations to secure Damascus at the “Triangle of Death” (the southern countryside of Damascus-Daraa- Quneitra) in the winter of 2015 feel the warmth of their embrace and realize the scope of the relationship that was greatly distorted. The faces, known in the Western media as a threat to global security, display feelings that are difficult to decipher or put in a single sentence. But in a single moment they mobilize multiple phases of love, determination, and valor.
Comrades close to the martyrs report how Sayyed prepared to meet Hajj Bozork (the great hajj in Farsi). He liked calling him that. He rushed to receive him at the gate with a smile that seldomly appeared on his face. A strong hug. An extended meeting and insistence of fruits being cut and placed before the dear guest, despite his refusal and coyness.
People close to them also recount novels of passion during the battles. One of its chapters involves martyr Ali Fayad aka Alaa Bosnia. In the battles of Sahel Al-Ghab, in the north of the country, he carried out a tight ambush – an art he excelled in. He recorded it and quickly sent it to Sayyed. His voice could be heard in the recording.
Someone asked him: “Is x person there, behind the lines?”
He tries to hide it and eventually says “yes”.
The mediator insists on letting Sayyed know that Alaa sent x person to the ambush. For his part, Sayyed insisted that the video reach Hajj Bozork, saying, “He will be very happy with what Alaa did. Send the video and tell him what happened … Tell him that there are lovers among us who are racing to offer sacrifices for the sake of this nation’s pride.”
Another person who attended one of the last meetings recounted that Sayyed whispered to Hajj Qassem when he was bidding him farewell. “Send my regards to the Leader (the leader of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, Grand Ayatollah His Eminence Sayyid Ali Khamenei) … Tell him your son Mustafa sends his regards and is telling you that the load on Hajj Qassem is great, so pray for him.”
As for the last meeting, at the Damascus airport the night Sayyed was assassinated (May 2016), the farewell lasted for about a quarter of an hour. They were supposed to go out together and meet later that same night. Sayyed insisted on staying for a while, and Hajj insisted on staying with him.
“It is not polite of me to leave and you are still here,” Hajj said. Sayyed insisted that Hajj leave. He returned less than an hour later as the sound of the explosion that killed Sayyed roared. That day, Hajj Qassem cried a lot – not for missing the “sword of the resistance”, but for missing the moment and an opportunity to reach the “goal”.
On that morning, he said, “Sayyed Mustafa’s name was written on that projectile for him to go alone, and God chose for him the best conclusion.”
Those who look at the faces of these two men, see the dark nightmare they represent to their enemies. Those who look carefully at the stillness of their eyes and the estrangement of their spirits which is apparent on their faces when they stand on the berms, realize very well that this axis has enough love to stock up on for the major battles.
Little has been said of about the many qualities of Mustafa Badreddine, who was also known as Sayyed Zulfiqar. But no matter what is said or written about this man, he is a book with profound chapters and connected paths. This book doesn’t only talk about the years of his jihad or his many military accomplishments, but it also sheds light on the knowledge, thoughts, and enlightenment he possessed since the early years of his life.
He never adopted an unwavering position or relied on rigid conclusions. Instead when completing any task, he worked on proposing new approaches where he saw new paths. Those around him might have thought he spoke different languages or read different dictionaries. He was known for his thirst of knowledge and reading despite being preoccupied – deserving the title “the Man of Surprises”.
The heart of the story
Mustafa grew up in the neighborhoods of the southern suburbs [of Beirut]. Like most revolutionary men and international leaders, he endured hardship. His actions were not limited to reacting, but he chose to take the initiative. His vision was not limited to Lebanon. He also focused on ‘Israeli’-occupied Palestine and al-Aqsa Mosque in addition to the universality of the objective which is based on the centrality of the larger project – the broader confrontation with the forces of arrogance. And here lies the heart of the story.
It was the peak of the “Israeli” aggression and invasion of southern Lebanon. Sayyed Zulfiqar, along with his comrade in arms jihadist leader Hajj Imad Mughniyeh, received his initial military training in a camp affiliated with the Fatah movement in the south.
He soon utilized his training and developed it in his own style. He then initiated a military course for a group of young men in a playground of one of the schools in Dahiyeh, forming the first nucleus of a jihadi movement that took many names at the time from “Work Committees” to “The Gathering of the Faithful Youth”.
That period was synonymous with revolution. Its first episodes were the heroic confrontation at the Khaldeh triangle during the Zionist invasion in 1982 as well as at the axis of the Faculty of Sciences in Hadath and the eastern entrance to the southern suburb.
I don’t have time to sleep
This article is not about Sayyed Zulfiqar’s achievements during confrontations that he engineered – from planning and implementation to supervision and from the time of the first shots until his martyrdom. During each confrontation in Lebanon and abroad, he inched closer to martyrdom.
Rather, this article explores the depths of this man who did not sleep, as his companions recall.
“I have no time to sleep. My enemy does not sleep,” he often said.
He was the man who gradually advanced the performance, tactics, mechanisms, methods, and planning of the resistance. He never omitted any detail when it came to field implementation, adopting advanced technology. He even paid attention to the appearance of fighters. He was eager to present the Mujahid in a full suit as if he were a groom on his wedding day – his hairstyle, military uniform, and polished shoes.
The former chief of staff of the occupation army, Benny Gantz, said in the wake of one of the qualitative confrontations in 2005 that “Hezbollah’s field operations are in an advanced stage. Every fighter with his military equipment is able to open a front alone.”
The school of Zulfiqar
Some of Sayyed Zulfiqar’s contemporaries say that he was a man with a great mind. He had unmatched motivation. He always tried to take the lead in dealing the first strike and was eager to make the last blow a courtesy of the resistance.
All the victories he planned – whether in the face of the “Israeli” enemy in and outside Lebanon or in defeating the takfiri enemy in Syria and elsewhere – attest that one of his most prominent achievements was the resistance’s school of military and security innovation. Sayyed Zulfiqar combined guerrilla warfare tactics with conventional combat methods. This school was unrivaled in the history of liberation movements.
The element of strength that formed the pillar of this school was the accumulation of expertise, experiences, training methods, and comprehensive knowledge in the arts of war – at the security and media level, or psychological warfare. All of these integrated and formed a circle of fire that surrounded the enemy in every confrontation – a circle he drew with his sweat, blood, and wounds. And following every victory, he prostrated expressing thanks to Allah Almighty during which the grains of sand loved to embrace his face.
Among the believers are men who have been true to their covenant with Allah; of them some have have been martyred; and some of them are still waiting, but they have never changed
Hezbollah announced early Monday it had shot down an Israeli drone after crossing the Lebanese airspace, fulfilling the Secretary General Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah’s promise to confront Israeli Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in the Lebanese skies.
In a statement, Hezbollah’s Media Relations Office said the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon “confronted with suitable weapons an Israeli drone as it crossed the Palestinian-Lebanese border towards the southern town of Ramieh.”
“The drone was downed in the outskirts of the town and now it is in the Resistance’s hand,” the statement added.
In an early strike on August 25, 2019 two explosive-laden Israeli drones fell down in Beirut’s southern suburb (Dahiyeh), hitting Hezbollah’s media center in Muawwad. The attacks, described by Sayyed Nasrallah as “very very dangerous” was preceded by Israeli strike which targeted Hezbollah post in Syria’s Damascus, killing two of the Lebanese Resistance fighters.
Tackling the event in that day (August 25), Sayyed Nasrallah vowed that Hezbollah will retaliate to Israeli aggression in Lebanon and Syria.
وحدَه السيد حسن نصرالله كان يعلم ماذا يفعل بوضع تصنيف عملية الردّ التي قررتها المقاومة على الغارة التي سقط فيها شهيدان للمقاومة في سورية، ضمن إطار العودة لقواعد الاشتباك المعمول بها منذ العام 2006، ومنع المحاولة الإسرائيلية لتغيير قواعد الاشتباك، والردّ الذي نفذته المقاومة جاء بفعل هذا التوصيف تحت غطاء وطني مثله بيان مجلس الدفاع الأعلى وتأكيده حق اللبنانيين بالدفاع بكل الوسائل. وبفعل هذا التوصيف كانت المتابعات التي رافقت العملية تائهة في علوم الحرب، بين عقول سياسية وعسكرية تقليدية قرأت العملية الجديدة للمقاومة كردّ موضعي مدروس بحساب عدم تصعيد الوضع ويشكّل رسالة رد على تمادي جيش الاحتلال، ترافق مع عدم وجود رغبة دولية وأميركية خصوصاً بالتصعيد، ما جعل كيان الاحتلال يحتوي العملية ويمتنع عن الذهاب لرد يؤدي للتصعيد، خصوصاً أنه على أبواب انتخابات لا تحتمل المخاطرة بتصعيد قد يؤدي للانزلاق للحرب.
محبّو المقاومة من أصحاب العقول التقليدية وضعوا نهاية الجولة برد رفع عتب من جيش الاحتلال وما رافقه من كذب بشأن وقوع الإصابات، في إطار حرص المقاومة بعدم توجيه ردّ يُحرج جيش الاحتلال ويكفي لتحقيق الهدف بتثبيت قواعد الاشتباك، وكارهوها ولو أظهر بعضهم خلاف ذلك تحدّثوا عن رد ورد على الرد متفق عليهما، بقنوات اتصال غير مباشرة، بعضهم قال روسية وبعض آخر قال فرنسية، لمنع التصعيد. فهل هذه هي الصورة الحقيقية لما جرى يوم الأحد في الأول من أيلول 2019 الذي صار يوماً تاريخياً؟
المقاومة تؤكد أنها لم ترد بعد على عملية الطائرتين المسيّرتين اللتين خرقتا سماء الضاحية ومثلتا محاولة جيش الاحتلال لتغيير قواعد الاشتباك، وأن الردّ عملياً محدّد بكلام السيد حسن نصرالله، عن توقيت ونوع التعامل الذي سيجري مع الطائرات المسيَّرة لجيش الاحتلال، باعتبارها منذ تاريخ عملية الضاحية، أكبر من انتهاك للسيادة يترك للدولة التعامل معه في إطار توثيق انتهاكات جيش الاحتلال للقرار 1701، لتصير عملاً عدوانياً سيتعرض للمواجهة، واستهداف ما تيسّر من المسيَّرات ضمن حساب يكفي لجعل حركتها مقيدة ومعقدة، ويحول دون استنزاف المقاومة لمواردها وقدراتها في حرب الطائرات المسيَّرة.
عملياً ردّ المقاومة كان على الغارة التي استهدفت مجاهدي المقاومة في سورية، وحملت اسمي شهيدي الغارة. وهنا نحتاج لبعض الهدوء والتأني في القراءة لنعرف ما جرى، ونضع من خلاله رؤية أي سياق يفتتح، وأي معادلة يرسم. فوجود المقاومة في سورية ينتمي لمرحلة ما بعد معادلات وقواعد اشتباك 2006، وما يحكم التعامل مع هذا الوجود لم ترسم له بعد قواعد اشتباك موضوعية يلتزمها الطرفان، المقاومة والاحتلال. بل هناك محاولات من الاحتلال لجعله هدفاً مشروعاً باعتباره وجوداً خارج لبنان، وسعي من المقاومة لجعل كل اعتداء يؤدي لسقوط شهداء موضوعاً للردّ المشروع. وكانت تجربة ثنائية عملية القنيطرة لجيش الاحتلال عام 2015 والرد عليها في مزارع شبعا عام 2015، النموذج الوحيد لهذه المحاولات، التي لم تتحول إلى قواعد اشتباك.
عملياً رد المقاومة فرض هذه المعادلة لحماية دماء مجاهديها في سورية وأي مكان في لبنان وخارجه، والآن صار اسمها قواعد اشتباك أضيفت لما سبقها الذي كان ميدانه الجغرافيا اللبنانية حصراً. فالردّ هنا فرض لقواعد اشتباك جديدة من جانب المقاومة وليس تثبيتاً لقواعد الاشتباك القديمة، لكن الرد يبدو أكبر من ذلك بكثير، بحيث يصير من السذاجة تصديق مجرد التفكير باعبتاره محدوداً وموضعياً ومدروساً. فكيف بالقول إنه متفق عليه؟ فنحن أمام أول عملية تستهدف جيش الاحتلال داخل جغرافيا فلسطين المحتلة عام 1948، من حدود دولة جوار عربي، ينتهي دون رد إسرائيلي بحجم ما يمثل، فيما العمل العسكري لجيش الاحتلال موضوع الردّ كان على وجود المقاومة خارج لبنان. وهو وجود لا يحظى بتغطية دولية تشرعنه، واستهدافه من جيش الاحتلال يحظى بالتفهم الدولي، وبالمقابل رد المقاومة يعتبر عدواناً على ما يعتبره المجتمع الدولي أرضاً إسرائيلية وليس أرضاً لبنانية محتلة، أو متنازعاً عليها، أو أرضاً عربية محتلة كالجولان أو الضفة الغربية، وهذا يعني ببساطة أن وجود المقاومة خارج لبنان بات محمياً بخط أحمر، وأن مواقع الاحتلال داخل فلسطين الـ 48 لم تعد خطاً أحمر.
ردّ المقاومة وما تلاه يقولان شيئاً جديداً كلياً، عبّرت عنه الخارجية الأميركية بما يشبه إعلان الخيبة من تهرّب جيش الاحتلال من الردّ، ومن يقرأه يظن أن الأمور ذاهبة إلى جولة تصعيد، بما تضمنه من تغطية لما وصفه بالحق المشروع لإسرائيل بالدفاع عن نفسها ، ولغة عصبية في الحديث عن تحميل حزب الله مسؤولية التصعيد وزعزعة الاستقرار في لبنان والمنطقة، والاستقرار لم يتزعزع ولا من يزعزعون. وقد مسح الاحتلال بجلده الإهانة وكذب بشأن إصابته لتفادي التصعيد، وجاء البيان الفرنسي مليئاً بالمعاني أيضاً بالتأكيد على الوقوف على مسافة واحدة من طرفين هما المقاومة و إسرائيل . وهو يباهي باتصالاته بكل منهما لمنع التصعيد. وهو يعلم أن أحدهما تعرّض للاستهداف خارج حدوده ، أي المقاومة، والثاني تعرض للاستهداف داخل حدوده ، أي كيان الاحتلال، وأن أحدهما دولة تقيم أفضل العلاقات مع فرنسا، والثاني حركة سياسية عسكرية تصنِّف فرنسا جناحها العسكري المعني بالرد على لوائح الإرهاب.
الذين كانوا في لبنان ينتظرون رد المقاومة ويفركون كفوفهم بانتظار الرد الإسرائيلي على الردّ أصابهم الإحباط، فقد سقطت نظرياتهم عن تعريض المقاومة لبنان لخطر حرب. ونعيق البوم والغربان عن الخراب والدمار ذهب هباء. فقد خذلتهم إسرائيل ، ولم يجدوا إلا الحديث عن حزنهم على غياب الدولة، أو عن قبول مسبق من جانب إسرائيل لصفعة وجودية تاريخية، اخترعوا له وجود تفاهم ضمني أميركي إيراني موهوم لضبط الردّ والردّ على الردّ.
ردّ المقاومة نصف حرب وليس عملاً موضعياً ولا يصلح ليكون رداً متفقاً عليه مع أي كان، فكيف مع الاحتلال المصاب في كبده اليوم، ليصير الردع الذي يحكم معادلة المقاومة والاحتلال، وقد ترسمل بقواعد جديدة بمدى ونوع أعمق بكثير من أن تفسره الانتخابات، أو حسابات نتنياهو، بل حدود قدرة الكيان سياسياً وعسكرياً وشعبياً على تحمّل اختبارات الحرب، الكيان الذي قدّم لنا السيد الإثبات أنه أوهن من أوهن من أوهن من بيت العنكبوت، وها هي إسرائيل المصابة في روحها أمام أعيننا، والأعمى وحده لا يريد أن يرى.
وحدَه السيد يعرف ماذا فعل، فقد غيّر قواعد الحرب وهو يتحدث عن منع العدو من تغيير قواعد الاشتباك، وما جرى سيغير معادلات حركة جيش الاحتلال في سورية والعراق وفلسطين، وكما كل مرة المقاومة تسجل السابقة وتفتح الطريق لتصير قانون حرب.
Hezbollah S.G. Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah addressing crowds in Sayyed Shuhada Complex in Dahiyeh on the third night of Ashura commemoration (Monday, September 2, 2019).
Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah advised the Israelis on Monday to save the date of September 1, 2019 when Lebanon’s Islamic Resistance carried out Avivim retaliatory strike, saying that the operation represented a new stage in the Israeli-resistance struggle.
Addressing crowds at Sayyed Shuhada Complex in Beirut’s Dahiyeh, Sayyed Nasrallah said while the Israeli enemy wanted to change rules of engagements with Hezbollah, the Lebanese Resistance, on its turn, broke red lines set by Tel Aviv.
His eminence stressed that Avivim strike was an achievement by itself, as it took place despite all Israeli and US threats as well as measures taken by the occupation army at the border with Lebanon.
Sayyed Nasrallah, meanwhile, said that the Resistance is committed to confront Israeli drones in the Lebanese skies, but noted, in this context, that its leadership will decide the right time and place for such confrontation.
Thanks and Salutes
After thanking God, Sayyed Nasrallah saluted Resistance fighters “who have been for eight days fully ready to retaliate for the Israeli aggression,” referring to Israeli strikes that killed two of Hezbollah fighters in Syria and the attack by two drones on Beirut’s Dahiyeh last week.
The Resistance leader then praised Lebanese Army and Lebanese people for their support and steadfastness in face of the Israeli aggression.
His eminence also hailed President Michel Aoun, Premier Saad Hairi and Speaker Nabih Berri over their national stances regarding the Israeli aggression.
Sayyed Nasrallah furthermore thanked Lebanese and some Arab media outlets over their coverage that refuted lies circulated by occupation army and media.
“We’ve Punished the Enemy”
Hezbollah S.G. stressed that the latest escalation started last week by the Israeli aggression in Syria and Dahiyeh, noting that Israeli explosive-laden drones, which fell down in Dahiyeh before dawn last Sunday (August 25), failed to achieve their goals.
“Since the first hours (of the aggression) we announced that we won’t keep mum and that we won’t accept new equations to be imposed, so we said that certainly we will retaliate.”
“We announced that the Resistance will retaliate. This announcement represents a point of strength for the Resistance,” Sayyed Nasrallah said during third night of the holy month of Muharram.
“What happened since last Sunday represented a punishment for the enemy…We are before a retaliatory attack on several levels including military and psychological ones.”
“The Israeli Army has evacuated all its posts and bases at the border in Lebanon since I announced my threats. I told them to hide and keep away (from potential targets), but what happened was that they have disappeared!”
“Tyrant Israel Humiliated”
“In the last eight days, the entire world saw Israel – the tyrant power- frightened, concerned and hiding in… It’s humiliation!” Sayyed Nasrallah said.
“On the other side, the Lebanese Army, the Resistance fighters and the Lebanese people stayed in their posts and towns (near the border)… It’s honor!”
Hezbollah S.G. noted, meanwhile, that Avivim strike took place during the day and not the night, stressing that the Resistance leadership deliberately decided to do so, in the Israeli depth and despite all risks and measures taken by the Israeli occupation.
“Despite all measures and fake targets set by the Israeli enemy, the Resistance exerted patience and accurately hit the target. What happened proves the Resistance’s courage, accuracy, responsibility.”
“No More Red Lines”
Sayyed Nasrallah stressed that what the Resistance’s operation in Avivim is an achievement since it took place despite threats and intimidation attempts, noting that one of the major red lines set by the Israeli enemy was broken during the strike.
“Territories occupied by the Israeli enemy in 1948 is one of the major red lines set by the Israeli enemy,” Sayyed Nasrallah said, stressing that the Resistance managed to launch an attack at this area, breaking the Israeli major red line.
“While the enemy wanted to change rules of engagements, the Resistance managed to break one of Israel’s major red lines,” his eminence said.
Sayyed Nasrallah addressed the Israeli as saying:
“September 1, 2019… save this date. It’s the start of a new stage of the situation at the border between Lebanon and the Palestinian occupied territories.”
Israeli Drones
Sayyed Nasrallah also vowed that the Resistance will confront the Israeli drones in the Lebanese skies.
“We have a new target today, which is the Israeli drones. In the last years we avoid this target over local considerations,” the Resistance leader said, stressing that it’s the Lebanese people’s right to defend their land.
“We will defend our land. We will confront these drones in the Lebanese skies.”
Sayyed Nasrallah noted that some parties will slam such moves under the pretext that they will rise tensions with the Israeli enemy.
In this context, Sayyed Nasrallah said:
“I tell those people, who are keen for stability in the region, that they have to talk to the international community in a bid to tell Israel that the Resistance won’t accept Israeli violation of the Lebanese sovereignty anymore.”
“Israelis have to know that what happened was because of (Israeli Premier Benjamin) Netanyahu’s idiocy,” Sayyed Nasrallah said, adding: “If Israel attacks us then we won’t recognize the so-called Blue Line.”
Hezbollah Secretary General His Eminence Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah stressed that “Israel” must pay a price for its aggression on Lebanon.
Addressing thousands of mourners on the first night of Ashoura, Sayyed Nasrallah highlighted that “there is no doubt that since last Sunday, Lebanon as well as the “Israeli” enemy have been living in a new phase and special conditions.”
Hailing the Lebanese national unity over the recent “Israeli” aggression, His Eminence praised the positions of the Lebanese President, House Speaker, Prime Minister and the Supreme Council of Defense
“The Lebanese consensus has its significance, especially when the enemy is exploiting the situation to incite on the resistance,” he added, reiterating that “the response on the “Israeli” aggression will be from Lebanon.”
Sayyed Nasrallah further clarified that “stating that the response is not in Shebaa Farms means that the response will be open because our response to previous operations was in Shebaa Farms.”
In parallel, the Resistance Leader emphasized: “We have been greatly patient when it comes to drones and the first response to the attack in the Dahyia means that we must start working to down it.”
“We have the right to down the drones, but that does not mean that we will down each one on every hour, day or week,” Sayyed Nasrallah elaborated.
According to His Eminence, Hezbollah Resistance works within a specific performance and tactic i.e. based on its will and estimation.
Based on this, he announced that the Resistance “will choose the time, place and reasons of response.”
Back to the recent “Israeli” drone aggression on Dahyia [Southern Suburbs of Beirut], Sayyed Nasrallah revealed that “the 1st drone was aimed to explode as well as the 2nd one. The two drones aimed to land, drop the bomb and leave in the middle of the night.”
“The “Israeli” must pay the price and the response is coming,” he declared, pointing out that “Israeli” prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s pretext is the claim of precision missiles, and then talking about a goal associated with the manufacture of precision missiles.”
According to His Eminence, “If we had precision missile factories, we would say that we have that, but we do not have precision missile factories.”
“We have precise missiles but we do not have factories for manufacturing it and if one day we were able to have these factories I will proudly announce that,” he said, accusing “Netanyahu for looking for a pretext to impose new rules.”
Meanwhile, His Eminence stated that “Netanyahu is lying to his people by alleging that through what happened in the Dahyia he disrupted the precision missiles factories. Netanyahu is lying to the “Israelis” and the international community.”
“We have in Lebanon what we need in any small or large confrontation from precise missiles,” Sayyed Nasrallah declared, underscoring that “the response to the “Israeli” aggression is final. The issue for us is about establishing rules and protecting a country.”
Warning that “through these drones, the “Israeli” can put bombs and land on the roof of any house, car or building and blow up,” His Eminence cautioned that “the exploding drones will open the door of assassinations in Lebanon.”
“The resistance is not interested in saying what is the response and everything that is being said is neither true nor accurate,” he added, noting that “the Resistance’s way of response is known to only few people and we have no sources and this confuses the enemy.”
Sayyed Nasrallah also said: “The subject of the response is in the hands of the resistance’s military commanders who know what they are doing. It is important to make the enemy understand that our country is not open for aggression.”
HEZBOLLAH LEADER REVEALS NEW DETAILS ON SOUTHERN BEIRUT DRONE ATTACK
Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah during a speech communicating the holy day of Ashura. Via al-Manar TV
Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah confirmed that the retaliation to the Israeli aggression in Dahiyeh was imminent regardless of the enemy threatening and menacing.
Speaking at the inauguration of the Muharram mourning ceremonies in Sayyed Shohadaa complex on Saturday night, Sayyed Nasrallah said Hezbollah appreciates the Lebanese stance concerning the Israeli aggression on Beirut’s southern suburb last week. “There was a national consensus on condemning what happened (in Dahiyeh) and considering it as a real aggression against Lebanon,” Sayyed Nasrallah said, hailing specifically the official stance of the Lebanese President Michel Aoun, Prime Minister Saad Hariri as well as that of Speaker Nabih Berri.
Sayyed Nasrallah stressed that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu adopted the aggressive actions in Syria, Iraq and Lebanon, adding “the Lebanese official and public stance was very important because the enemy strives on inciting people against the resistance.” “We should stop at Berri’s call to Amal movement to keep vigilant and ready, that means the resistance with all its factions and movements has a firm and coherent stance, cutting road against any delusions,” his eminence confirmed.
Concerning the venue of the resistance retaliation, Sayyed Nasrallah said it will be in Lebanon, not necessarily from Shebaa farms.
“The first retaliation on the Israeli aggression would be initiating our right to down Israeli drones,” Sayyed Nasrallah said, adding that the Israeli enemy should know well that the Lebanese airspace is not open to its drones and daily violations. The UN Security Council and all embassies that are calling officials today, have made no effort to stop the Israeli air violations in the past, his eminence indicated. “The Resistance will choose the right time and place to target the Israeli drones in our airspace,” the Hezbollah leader said.
We will follow a specific strategy, if commit ourselves to drop any drone then the Israeli will send us dozens daily to deplete our capabilities, the S.G. assured.
Sayyed Nasrallah revealed that the drones’ mission was deploying IEDs and detonating them. “The preliminary data from the drone did not show the presence of an explosive device, but on Monday the experts found a bomb in the drone, and therefore we are before a bombing attack without obvious Israeli fingerprints, but it is Allah’s mercy that led us to detect the operation, which forced the Israeli to confess it.”
Commenting on the Israeli claim that the Israeli drones in Dahiyeh were targeting a plant for producing precision-guided missiles, Sayyed Nasrallah said Netanyahu invented this claim to serve him as a pretext to attack Lebanon. “We are before a clear Israeli aggression, and Netanyahu’s claim of the existence of precision-guided missile factories was a pretext to justify targeting Lebanon and break the rules of engagement to impose new ones. Netanyahu wants to convince his people that he’s doing a great job, but he’s lying,” Sayyed Nasrallah said.
“There’s no plant for making precision-guided missiles in the place where the drones fell in Dahiyeh,” his eminence said, adding that Hezbollah doesn’t have any plant for producing precision-guided missiles, affirming that Hezbollah has enough missiles of that kind.
“Retaliating the Israeli aggression is inevitable,” Hezbollah leader assured. “Even enemies and adversaries say they understand our right to retaliate, but they try to convince us not to make any reaction or that the retaliation comes modest, but for us it’s not a matter of dignity rather than to affirm the rules of engagement and the logic of protection against any new Israeli aggression,” he said, adding that breaching the Lebanese airspace will open doors for assassinations through drones, “this can’t be tolerated.”
“‘Israel’ should pay the price, all the Israeli threatening and menacing will not keep us from retaliating.”
Sayyed Nasrallah concluded by saying that the resistance is not concerned with revealing any data about the retaliation. “Speculations in this regard are groundless, it’s the mission of field commanders who know exactly what to do, in terms of its time and scale. We intend to keep the enemy confused as it is now.”
“As President Aoun said, we will prove to the whole world that Lebanon is not a country open to aggression,” Sayyed Nasrallah ended up saying.
Nouvelles du front ukrainien, par Thierry Meyssan
-
Les États-Unis et la Russie veulent conclure la paix le plus vite possible
en Ukraine. Le problème n'est pas où l'on croit : il semble que les
straussiens ...
The man bankrupting America
-
“Go F*** Yourself, Scott: A Full Background Check on The Man Bankrupting
America, Human Skin Tag, Scott Bessent.“ (Blundell).In the same week,
different US...
Occult Utopia Of Jewish Golden Age
-
Occult Utopia Of Jewish Golden Age September 6 2026
___________________________________ More Vids! +BN Vids Archive! HERE!
________________________________...
And You Remain Impossible to Erase
-
There you are, the inspiring Imam, forever present in the conscience of the
honorable and the hearts of the loyal.
Father Dave Smith, Pray For (Mufti) Dr. Hassoun
-
Abducted by the terrorist regime in Syria in 2025, Sheikh Hassoun has been
sentenced to life in prison I spoke with Father Dave Smith, an Australian
Anglic...
Report on Beth Israel vigil 08-15-26
-
*Charlie Kirk and JFK*
John F. Kennedy was assassinated under questionable circumstances on
November 22, 1963, and Charlie Kirk fell on September 10 of la...
On The Road To International Anarchy
-
ON THE ROAD TO INTERNATIONAL ANARCHY— An Analysis (14 August 2026) by
Lawrence Davidson Part I — The Turn Toward […]
-
Hello all,
It is with great sadness that I share with you the passing of our beloved
sister, Mother, and Grandmother, the individual that you all knew ...
Best Horror Podcast
-
Best Horror Podcast Introduction: Horror podcasts […]
The post Best Horror Podcast appeared first on Copper Shock Horror Podcast.
Ikhras Endorses Muntadhar Al-Zaidi
-
“Oh parties of banditry and sectarianism and corruption, we have come and
our goal is to destroy you.” Ikhras formally endorses Muntadhar al-Zaidi,
Iraqi j...
Prince Charles: Foreign Jews behind bloodshed in ME
-
In May, 2017, British Crown Prince Charles declined an invitation from
Zionist entity’s president Reuven Rivlin‘s to attend the 100th anniversary
of the no...
Palestinian Women – One for All, All for One
-
Honouring All Palestinian Women by Honouring Three: Hanin Zoabi, Ahed
Tamimi, Samah Sabawi Vacy Vlazna “Palestinian women have always stood side
by side ...
US’s Saudi Oil Deal from Win-Win to Mega-Lose
-
By F. William Engdahl Who would’ve thought it would come to this? Certainly
not the Obama Administration, and their brilliant geo-political think-tank
neo-...
-
*Mordechai Vanunu wins human rights prize of Brazilian Press Association *
* http://www.alternativenews.org/english/index.php/features/updates/7038-mordechai...
Abdul Aziz Rantissi:
"My ultimate wish, my God, is to attain martyrdom,"...God granted him his wish on April 17, 2004, at the hands of Israeli assassins.
