Showing posts with label Gaza Freedom March. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gaza Freedom March. Show all posts

Thursday, 17 May 2012

“Lebanese Sides Aiding Terrorist Groups in Syria”

Local Editor
As he stressed that Syria has been facing a terrorist assault, Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Meqdad said arming terrorist groups has been taking place through the Lebanese-Syrian border.

faisal meqdad interview manarTalking to al-Manar channel on Wednesday, Meqdad urged “neighboring countries, including Arab states, not to overlook terrorism.”

“To our people in Lebanon we say do not permit those groups to practice terrorism through aids offered by some Lebanese,” Meqdad said adding that he did not mean the Lebanese government.

While answering if Syria has information about arms smuggling through Lebanon-Syria border, the Deputy FM said: “We have credible and accurate information in this issue. We know everything, as we know them by names”.

“It’s a well known party,” he said further about this side adding: “any way it declares that it gives support to these groups and it politically disagrees with Syria.”

“We are facing a terrorist assault and arming the terrorist groups comes through Lebanon-Syria border.”

The Syrian official also called on these sides to respect the neighborhood with Syria and “not to serve the agendas and orders by some Gulf states.”

But he also warned: “whom who provoke hostility to Syria will inevitably lose.”

Commenting about accusations made by Saudi foreign minister that Syria has inflamed the latest unrest in Tripoli, Meqdad said: “this is absolutely far beyond from reality, he (Saud al-Faisal) knows well who is behind funding terrorists in Syria.”

He also reminded that the Saudi FM had previously, along with others, declared that they were supporting the opposition in Syria.

Source: Al Manar TV
17-05-2012 - 10:49 Last updated 17-05-2012 - 10:49



River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Thursday, 21 July 2011

FPM, Hezbollah Famous for Seriousness, Struggle, Jihad

Hussein Assi
MP Youssef Khalil to Al-Manar Website:
  • March 14 Rhetoric Political; Aoun Dialogue Man
  • Setting Preconditions for Dialogue Obstructs Process
  • Dialogue Not Magical Tool… Yet, It Is Very Useful
  • Arab States Have No Unified Stance towards Lebanon
  • Aoun Did Not Promise; Patriarch Rahi Did Not Demand
  • Reports of Conflicts over Appointments Not Accurate
  • Government Facing Historic Challenge… But Will Succeed

Member of the Change and Reform parliamentary bloc in Lebanon MP Youssef Khalil declared his support for the call made by President Michel Sleiman to re-vivify the national dialogue table.
In an exclusive interview with Al-Manar Website, Khalil said that dialogue was very useful, even if it took some time. He found strange the preconditions set by the March 14 forces to take part in the dialogue process, and expressed belief that such rhetoric is political. He also questioned the usefulness of the participation of the Arab League in a Lebanese dialogue, noting at the same time that Arab states have no unified stance towards the Lebanese issue.
Khalil denied leaks about conflicts between the Free Patriotic Movement and its allies in the government over appointments. He also denied claims that FPM leader MP Michel Aoun has promised Maronite Patriarch Beshara Rahi that the General Security Chief post would be restored to Christians.
He said the government should succeed in its mission, and expressed belief that success in such sensitive circumstances was an honor.

Dialogue Must Be Responsible

MP Youssef Khalil told Al-Manar Website that participation in the national dialogue table was self-evident. He said that he personally believes national dialogue is very useful and beneficial, even if it took some time. He pointed, however, that dialogue was not a magical tool that could suddenly solve all issues.
He spoke of some ‘conditions’ for the dialogue to succeed. “These conditions might include the necessity to put a time frame for the dialogue, and to offer guarantees that the dialogue be based on logic and responsible behavior,” he said. In this context, he found strange how some parties want to reach a resolution of dissolving the Resistance’s weapons. “Dealing with such a sensitive and delicate issue must be responsible, given that the Resistance concerns the whole nation,” he added.
Khalil said that the Free Patriotic Movement leader MP Michel Aoun could not be against dialogue in principle. “MP Michel Aoun is the dialogue man number one,” he said. He also revealed that General Aoun was always ready for launching dialogue with all factions, stressing the need to give a national aspect for the dialogue, instead of political considerations.

‘MARCH 14’ RHETORIC BASELESS

Member of the Change and Reform bloc in the Lebanese parliament distinguished between Aoun’s conditions for dialogue, which seek to facilitate dialogue, and those set by the other bloc aimed at obstructing the whole process.
Khalil pointed in this context to the announcement made by the March 14 forces that their participation in the dialogue hinges on putting the Resistance’s arms under the control of the state within a certain timeframe, alongside Hezbollah’s approval, before the dialogue launch. He found strange such rhetoric, and called on all parties to propose logical solutions for discussion at the dialogue table at all levels, including the political, economic and social ones.
In conclusion, Khalil said that March 14’s rhetoric was not only political but also baseless. He noted that whoever sets preconditions on dialogue does not possess the sufficient courage to discuss things in depth.
The Lebanese lawmaker did not find any problem in the relation between the state and the Resistance, speaking of a kind of “integration” between both of them. However, he expressed openness and urged the March 14 forces to present their plan for objective, scientific discussion. “We don’t want to shift from the Resistance status to the incomplete peace status,” he stressed. “Let everyone assume its duties. We won’t accept that our dignity is not preserved anymore.”
Khalil also commented on March 14 forces’ condition that the Arab League takes part in the dialogue. He said that, in principle, there’s no problem with such participation. However, he added: “When the dialogue focuses on Lebanon, we’re supposed to resolve our issues as Lebanese without resorting to foreigners, with all our respect to Arabs who have helped us many times. Even more, Arab states have no unified stance towards the Lebanese cause, given that they have not experienced our tragedy and they have not lived under occupation from a fierce enemy.”

ALLY REMAINS ALLY, BROTHER

Turning to the ministerial issue, Khalil pointed to the cabinet’s recent agreement on various appointments in state positions. He denied all leaks about conflicts among allies over the appointments, and mainly over the sect of the General Security Chief. He noted that the FPM leader has frankly declared that there was absolutely no problem at all between him and his allies at the level of any name or post. “Anyway, the ally remains an ally and a brother,” Khalil said, as he stressed the necessity to respect the sectarian distributions, given that some Lebanese imagine conflicts and then believe themselves.
Khalil also denied claims that MP Michel Aoun has promised Patriarch Beshara Rahi that the post of the General Security Chief would be restored to Christians. “General Aoun does not promise anybody of anything which is also related to the others’ decisions and beliefs,” he explained. He expressed belief that Rahi himself did not demand any guarantees or promises from Aoun, as the Patriarch adopts a general policy related to the rights of all sects. “The Patriarch wants that all factions representing the Lebanese society feel they are partners in the rule, in a sense or another.”

THERE’S NO WAY GOVERNMENT COULD FAIL

To conclude, Khalil admitted that the Lebanese government, headed by Prime Minister Najib Miqati, was facing a historic challenge as its constituents, mainly the FPM and Hezbollah, are famous for their seriousness, struggle and Jihad. “Such parties did not enter the government to fail,” he asserted.
The Lebanese lawmaker, meanwhile, stressed that the social issues should be given the absolute priority. He expressed belief that the government could not fail in guaranteeing social security for all Lebanese as well as resolving the problems of optional security. “Otherwise, we will witness a dangerous precedent. However, I only see success for the government,” he said.
Khalil did not believe the Special Tribunal for Lebanon was threatening the government. He said that the government respects the international law, but will not accept that an international force would be a reason for an internal conflict in Lebanon. He said that the indictment in the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri’s case was not the end of the world.
While believing that the opposition would seek to topple the government and may resort to all possible and legitimate means to achieve this goal, he said that the government would have the honor to succeed in such delicate and sensitive circumstances. “This is the real challenge, and I believe the government will overcome it,” he declared. “There’s no way the government could fail in this mission. I can’t imagine that people who spent their lives in Jihad and struggle could enter the government to simply fail.”
Source: Al-Manar Website

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Tuesday, 8 March 2011

So, what is really going on? Pretexts?

Via Friday-Lunch-Club

(Al Akhbar)- Al Akhbar, a newspaper with a 'casual' association with PM designate Mikati had this: "US Sources informed Lebanese officials that the new strategy towards Lebanon is based on the premise of preventing President Najib Mikati from forming his government, and to allow economic, political and diplomatic pressures to take their tolls, ... rendering him unable to commit to a joint strategy with the components of March 8. The hoped for result is to, either give March14 (13 really) a 'blocking third' or declare forfeit. US sources said that the Lebanese-Canadian Bank episode is but an 'appetizer.'"

Posted by G, Z, or B at 6:59 PM


Local Editor

Loyalty to the Resistance Bloc MP Walid Sukariyeh considered that after the collapse of former PM Saad Hariri's government, the March 14 forces seek the collapse of PM-designate Najib Mikati's government, so that March 14 would get back to power and exploit it to serve its interests, and the US schemes.

Sukariyeh stated that the incitement title used is the resistance arms, yet that team [March 14] is false accusing the resistance that its weapons are used against the Lebanese, forgetting that the resistance liberated Lebanon in 2000.

MP Walid Sukariyeh also reminded that after the 2000 liberation, the resistance said it did not want any interests on the Lebanese level, nor does it want services or power, but all it wants is to defend Lebanon against the Zionist enemy.

On another hand, in an interview with Akhbar Al Yawm (Today's News) Agency, Loyalty to the Resistance Bloc MP clarified that Lebanon is not separated from its surrounding, but it is rather a part of the regional struggle.

In this context, Sukariyeh referred that Lebanon is exploited by regional and international schemes, and therefore when the government is to be formed, there must be taken into consideration what challenges are there in the region, and how could they be faced.

Furthermore, MP Walid Sukariyeh pointed out that PM-designate Najib Mikati has some time, especially in light of the latest developments on in the Arab region, and which also affected the US, "Israeli" and Arab countries' policies.

Sukariyeh stated this imposes on Mikati to take his time to study the changes and the upcoming policies, in order to specify the best government frame that would face the current instability.

MP Walid Sukariyeh affirmed PM Mikati should form a government that would provide a political management to save Lebanon from what is happening in the region, and prevent it from becoming part of the region disputes.
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Tuesday, 1 February 2011

GEORGE GALLOWAY SLAMS HOSNI MUBARAK [VIDEO]

One year ago somebody at H (Hasbara) PT, known as PTT smeared Galloway for trying to break the siege from Egypt ans crossing the limit of solidarity.

Pharaoh is not the enemy, therefore "Only apologizing to Egypt in a public press conference can make one forgive these fatal mistakes which made Egypt sound as THE enemy deflecting our sight from the real enemy"

The Neo-Handhla also wrote:

  • Let's assume that the Egyptian government was replaced with new democratically elected one, what do you think would happen?
  • Believe me, it is very simple.The tag Is ready: Eygpt for is a terrorist state. Full Stop!
  • Who can guarantee that the newly elected government and its president will not be the same as the previous regime?
  • Israel will rush to occupy Gazan borders again (let's say they will intensify their occupation and bring back their soldiers to Gaza/Egypt borders).
  • The Zionists will find it the moment of history when they can establish their dream of Greater Israel. They might not only occupy Sinai, but invade Egypt across the Red Sea until Israel reaches the Nile.
  • What may happen next is another story.
  • If the existing regime in Egypt or a newly elected one opens the borders with Gaza in the present conditions of Palestine, without any international guarantees that Palestine is going to be autonomous in controlling its own borders for the good of the people in Palestine and not to serve factions whose agendas are not acceptable to any patriot.
Read more

GEORGE GALLOWAY SLAMS HOSNI MUBARAK [VIDEO]

Via IP

30. Jan, 2011

“… Hosni Mubarak became an international criminal and an outlaw of the Arab world.”….GEORGE GALLOWAY

“The People... Want... To Topple The Regime!"

 
Thanks to Galloway, Gaza Freedom March, all Real Activists and the great people of Gaza -UP


River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Sunday, 16 January 2011

Ambassador Connelly, Nicholas Fettoosh, Michel Sleiman ...or the scramble to preserve the Cedar revolution ...

It was a very busy Sunday for US Ambassador Maura Connelly today, as the scrambled from one office to another in a bid to preserve March14th' 'advantage'.
Posted by G, Z, or B at 12:47 PM

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Wednesday, 23 June 2010

Gaza moves New York City mother from apathy to activism

Alex Kane writing from New York City, US, The Electronic Intifada, 22 June 2010


Debbie Mardon (left) and her Palestinian-American husband Mahmoud Bitar (center) attend a demonstration on 31 May demonstration in Times Square against Israel's attack on the Gaza Freedom Flotilla. (Ellen Davidson)

Last New Year's Eve, Debbie Mardon did not celebrate with noise makers or confetti -- instead, she headed to Cairo's main square to participate in the Gaza Freedom March with her daughter Jenna Bitar, 18, and son Joel, 23.

Amid police violence aimed at protesters and Egyptian security forces blockading them inside their hotel, Debbie, 55, a native New Yorker, said that protesting in Cairo "was the scariest thing I've ever done in my life."

It was an unlikely place to be for a previously apolitical mother who voted for George W. Bush and as recently as three years ago relied on right-wing radio hosts Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh to help her make sense of the world.

More than 1,300 activists from 43 countries traveled to Cairo to take part in the Gaza Freedom March, a demonstration aimed at bringing attention to the ongoing blockade of the Gaza Strip.

Since 2006, after the Islamist movement Hamas won democratic elections, Israel and Egypt have completely blockaded this besieged coastal strip on the Mediterranean, only allowing in basic humanitarian aid. The situation worsened in December 2008, when Israel invaded Gaza, eventually killing about 1,400 Palestinians, the majority of them civilians.

Debbie and her children, like the rest of the activists who participated in the Gaza Freedom March, were outraged at what many have labeled the "Gaza massacre."

The three-year journey for Debbie, her husband Mahmoud and their two children from political indifference to passionate involvement in the Palestine solidarity community has brought them closer together as a family, and they now regularly attend demonstrations together.

For Debbie, things came to a head during the attack on Gaza in the winter of 2008-09. It was a personally harrowing time -- both she and Mahmoud had lost their mothers and a good friend had been placed in a nursing home, and Debbie decided it was time to find out more about what was happening in Palestine.

She started attending talks and lectures about Palestine, and one in particular, featuring Norwegian doctor Mads Gilbert at Columbia University, left an indelible impression.

"It was jaw-dropping. He showed us photos of dying and maimed children, children burned from the white phosphorous, and the photos had me in tears. Then he said, this suffering is not caused by a natural disaster, it is political, it is foreign policy and you can no longer be silent while your government supports this. After that I made an effort to find out how I could get involved," Debbie said.

Native New Yorker

Debbie, tall, outgoing and buoyant, can be found in her fifth floor walk-up apartment on the Upper East Side. She is welcoming and quick to offer dinner and drinks. The apartment she shares with her Palestinian-American husband and two kids is snug, with enough room to feel comfortable but not enough to avoid each other if everyone's home.

There are pictures of Jenna in a Halloween costume in the kitchen, plants around the living room, a comfortable couch and a black cat named Blossom. Their bookshelf is filled with the works of Noam Chomsky, Chris Hedges and Norman Finkelstein and flyers advertising leftist events in the city are posted near the refrigerator.

Three years ago, Debbie would have been on the couch watching Bill O'Reilly and reading conservative Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan.

Debbie took comfort in Fox News' slant on the world. "I wanted to know that someone out there was watching so our country wasn't torn apart by unpatriotic voices," she said.

But for most of Debbie's life, politics were not important. One of five siblings, she grew up in the Bedford Park neighborhood in the Bronx and attended Walton High School. Her mother was a homemaker and her father worked as an electrician.

Debbie went to the City College School of Architecture, where she first met her future husband, Mahmoud Bitar, a Palestinian-American, at the end of their sophomore year. Mahmoud was taken with Debbie starting with the first time they met.

"We talked under a tree in the rain on campus. I saw her heart and fell in love," Mahmoud said.

When Debbie first met Mahmoud, she did not understand what it meant to be someone from Palestine. Mahmoud was uncomfortable with his heritage, and he let people, including Debbie when they started dating, think he was Jewish or Italian. Debbie recalls how "people said things to him like, 'You're not a Palestinian, you're too nice.'"

Born in the Old City of Jerusalem in 1958, Mahmoud was brought up immersed in the politics of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He lived in Jericho, a city in the West Bank, for the first ten years of his life after his family moved there because his father had set up a station in Jericho selling fruits and vegetables. In 1967, when the war broke out, Mahmoud and his family returned to Jerusalem after Israeli bombs killed three of his relatives.

As soon as Mahmoud and his two brothers were college-aged, their parents sent them to the United States. Mahmoud, now a US citizen, arrived in the country in 1977 on a student visa.

After getting married in 1980 and graduating from college three years later, Debbie and Mahmoud had their first child, Joel, in 1986, and their second, Jenna, in 1992. Debbie worked part-time at an architectural firm while raising their children.

Mahmoud, who has curly hair and seems to always have a twinkle in his eye, speaks in calm and at times airy tones, a contrast to Debbie's more forward and pointed way of talking. He currently works as an architect for New York City's Administration for Children's Services.

For most of their marriage and while raising Jenna and Joel, Mahmoud rarely talked about his childhood in Palestine.

"I never got a greater picture, it was just bad things were happening to the Palestinians, or at least my family that was Palestinian," Jenna said. "I visited there before I knew what was going on, for three weeks, with my grandparents when they were alive. I lived the life they lived for a bit, saw the checkpoints, but I didn't understand."

11 September 2001

The 11 September 2001 attacks jolted Debbie's political perspective, and made Mahmoud more nervous about his background as a Palestinian, especially as thousands of Middle Eastern men were profiled and arrested throughout New York City.

Debbie had just dropped Jenna off at school when she returned home and watched the second plane hit the World Trade Center on television.

Debbie turned to Fox News for clarity.

"That was the first time I started learning about foreign policy, and why someone would attack us," Debbie said.

But Debbie and Mahmoud rarely discussed post-11 September politics.

"We didn't discuss it, I just listened. Debbie's a leader by nature, so she always led with the remote control," Mahmoud recalled. "She had the remote control with her so she would pick the information, and I would retreat when I had really had enough of it."

Joel was apathetic about politics at the time, and Jenna stayed by her mother's side as she watched Fox.

Debbie's close attention to post-11 September politics did not last for too long after the Iraq War started in 2003, though, as her trust in the government slipped when the US did not find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

However, a series of events in 2008 would bring politics back into the family's life in a prominent way, and they have not turned back since.

Injustice and transformation

Debbie's family started attending the Redeemer Presbyterian Church almost twenty years ago. While they were initially drawn to the church, which met at Hunter College, by a smart and interesting pastor, over the years the congregation became a second family for all of them.

However, they were forced to leave this community in March 2008 after Mahmoud, who worked at the church on Sundays, was accused of stealing a CD of a church sermon. He was arrested by a City University of New York security guard and charged with assaulting an officer, resisting arrest and misdemeanor theft -- charges that Debbie and her family say were ridiculous and were later dropped.

"It was a small thing in the larger world, but it happened to us," Debbie recalled. "I thought that we would be immune to all this, and that the community we were a part of would care about truth and care about justice being served, but they didn't care about either of those things. It opened my eyes to greater injustices. I used to think that people who went to jail were probably guilty. But now, I thought, 'Oh my goodness! There are all these people in jail that are probably innocent.' Michael could've gone to jail, but he had a private lawyer. What happens if you're poor?" she said, using the nickname that Mahmoud had used when he first came to the US.

Nine months later, on 27 December 2008, Israel invaded the Gaza Strip, beginning what would be a devastating assault.

"It was during Gaza that we started to awaken," said Joel, who at the time was first foraying into politics by joining an antiwar organization at Hunter College and reading books about US foreign policy and the Israel-Palestine conflict. "Killing civilians indiscriminately with US weapons, paid for with our tax money, seemed to be so hideously wrong."

During what Amnesty International called "22 days of death and destruction," Debbie could not avoid the Gaza conflict, especially because Mahmoud's brother Farid, who was glued to Al-Jazeera's coverage of the assault, was emotionally devastated.

Joel, who was reading books like Noam Chomsky's The Fateful Triangle: The United States, Israel and the Palestinians, also started to talk with Debbie about the detrimental impact of US foreign policy on Palestine.

After those 22 days were over, Debbie started going to lectures and protests about the conflict and soon found herself enmeshed in the world of Palestine solidarity activism. Although described as the "leader" of the household, she was the last person to finally call herself an activist.

The assault on Gaza also made Mahmoud become more engaged with the Palestine solidarity movement.

"It's a natural conclusion to what happened in Gaza," Mahmoud said. "Our breath is being taken out of us. I felt an urgency to start having a voice."

In the last two years, the household has been transformed. Jenna described how sometimes, before she goes to sleep, Debbie will run into her room and "just read me books out loud," including passages from the work of Chris Hedges and Michael Parenti. "She'll come and say, 'I have to read you this passage, it's so good' and it'll be something sad and depressing," Jenna said, laughing.

These days, it is nearly impossible to miss Debbie and members of her family at activist events related to Palestine. The actions they frequent include protesting with Adalah-NY: The New York Campaign for the Boycott of Israel, in the group's campaign against Lev Leviev. An Israeli billionaire who owns a jewelry store in Manhattan, Leviev is involved with companies that invest in and construct illegal Jewish-only settlements on Palestinian land.

"She's really knowledgeable. She has really educated herself on Palestine," says Helen Schiff, a New York-based activist who has become close friends with Debbie over the past two years. "She has a voracious mind, and she's very, very smart."

However, her transition into political activism has not come without a cost for Debbie and her family. Her passion for politics has "caused a lot of stress on our relationship," said Mahmoud. "There's always a cost to anything, and it's drawing from our reservoir."

Some of her friends worry she is on the "wrong political track." One friend, Debbie said, told her, "I'm worried for your children."

Debbie believes that this kind of reaction stems from the fact that the life she and her family have chosen to live is unconventional.

"We're looking at the world from a whole different perspective, and it's a harder way to live. Most people that I know would not want that -- they would want a pretty status quo type of life," Debbie said.

While some of Debbie's friends avoid discussing Mideast politics with her, Debbie is eager to talk with friends who are interested in learning more about Israel's occupation of Palestine.

In 2009 Debbie took her brother to a talk by scholar Norman Finkelstein at the Brecht Forum, a political and social educational center on Manhattan's west side. Her brother, a Democrat and strong supporter of Barack Obama, said he was "shocked" by the realities of the situation in Gaza.

But for Debbie, knowledge is just the first step of many -- she helped raise money for students participating in the Gaza Freedom March in 2009, and helped organize a protest outside a Friends of the IDF fundraiser at the Waldorf-Astoria earlier this spring.

With Jenna attending college in the fall and Joel working as a doorman in the Upper East Side, Debbie plans to continue her part-time job, as well as her involvement in the Palestine solidarity movement.

"It is essential that the movement continue to grow. Hopefully, in this economic climate, Americans will decide that there are better uses for their money besides supporting unending wars that will fuel terrorism, not end it," Debbie said.

She used to think individuals could not change anything in the world. And she still thinks that.

"Over a long time you can change [the world], but personally, me? Coming along and changing anything, it's unlikely," Debbie said.

"But I can have a part ... I want to change things badly, but that's not even the thing that motivates me any longer," she said. "It's just that I can no longer sit by and watch things happen and not speak out and at least be a voice shouting out there."

Alex Kane is a 21-year-old college student, journalist and blogger based in New York City. He is a reporter for the Indypendent, and a frequent contributor to Mondoweiss. His articles have also appeared in Common Dreams, Red Pepper (UK), and Palestine Chronicle.

A version of this article originally appeared in the
Indypendent, a free New York City-based newspaper.

Monday, 21 June 2010

Al-Jazeera and Jordan Times: Is Erdogan a new Gamal abdel Nasser

UP's Comment:

Erdogan is Erdogan. On readings Al-jazeera and Jordan Times below tiltles wriiten after Flotilla Massacre, I remembered the Title:  "Mubarak is no Abdul Nasser and Galloway is no Salah Eddin" Given  at PTT to Yousef Abudayyeh Article, and the other Bullshit posted at that site, smearing Viva Palestina, and Gaza Freedom March.

Mubarak is no Nasser, but he is not the enemy, so leave him......
 
Commrade Yousef Abudayyeh can't "understand why anyone would want to send medical supplies in a break the siege effort through Egypt, and not cut through the borders from Lebanon or Jordan, (which is closer), and be in direct contact with the rogue state that is imposing the siege on the Palestinian people in the first place. "
"So unless these Internationals believe that they can export revolution into Egypt, so the traitor Mubarak Regime can collapse and the border between Gaza and Egypt then can be cracked open, I for one can not see the reason for not tackling the core problem, i.e., ‘Israel’ head on, unless they believe that a heart disease can be treated by putting a band aid on it. "


Most likey, our commrade will not understand why Lenanon's Flotilla would want to break the seage though sea and not cut through Fatima Gate at the borders, he will not understand why Hezbulla would say he has nothing to do with Lenanon's Flotilla.

and

Galloway is no Salah Eddin, he is seving another agenda (Iran), "And why are people surprised that someone like Galloway is in this for a reason other than breaking the siege ? .......


"People ,and I can name many Palestinian national leaders benefited from the suffering of our people many times and many are still are. So why someone like Galloway is beyond this ?

Why are you afraid of facing the loud and clear facts that is coming from people who dealt with these types first hand ? I believe that knowing the facts will help our people and their true supporters weed out the bad apples. ....."
 
And here Lamis Andoni Saying: Erdogan 'is no Gamal Abdel Nasser'
 
I agree generally with her but I don't like her title. Don't missundertand me, I am not saying Erdogan is the New Nasser, but I don't blame people saying that.
 
Erdogan is Erdogan, and Nasralla is Nasralla, though Arab masses consider him the New Nasser.
 
Yes Nasser "commanded an unrivalled influence over the Arab intelligentsia and masses during the late 1950s and 1960s, until his premature death in 1970." because the Arab Arab intelligentsia and masses of late 1950s and 1960 are not nowadays bought and demosticated intelligentsia and branwashed masses, divided into Sunna and Sheaa. May be this would explain why some Sunni arabs are suspicoius about Iran and Sheaa Nasrallah, and why 1950s and 1960 Shea Arabs were not suspicious about Sunni Naser.



Yes " Regional powers, such as Iran and Turkey, have stepped in to fill a leadership gap that has emerged partly as a result of Egypt's 1979 peace treaty with Israel, the US occupation of Iraq and the general decline in pan-Arab solidarity."
 
I would add thanks for Assad, the Syrian Fox who, because Syria can't alone fill the leadreship gap, and with realistic reading of the policies inivted Iran and Turkey to step in.
 
I think Lamis is hinting to Syria in Saying: "Even as Turkey is attacked in the West for supposedly "turning eastward" and favouring its "cultural affinity" with Muslim countries, the Arab world continues to see it as a bridge to the West and a potential mediator with the US and Israel." Because Moderate Arabs don't need a mediator with the US and Israel.
 
I claim Assad in calling Turkey to sponsor indirect talks with the zionist entity smartly played on  the Turkish "declared goal of being a bridge between East and West" I calain he knows in Advance that Turkish Mediation shall lead to nowhere. By Nowhere I mean Peace with the Jewish State. 
 
When Assad proposes regional alliance with Iran and Turkey, the Palestinian Idiot, "Based on the alliance proposed by Assad" expected a "joint Syrian-Iraqi-Turkish-Israeli-U.S.-Iranian military exercises pretty soon? Why not? It is all for "regional stability" and to defeat "Al-Qaeda!"
 
In realty the outcome of the Turkish mediation between Syria and Israel, Syria and Hamas prior to the latter's war against Gaza was Turky "calling off joint military maneuvers with" it's "long-standing ally," and "leaving the podium at Davos after an angry exchange with Shimon Peres, the Israeli president"
 
The same Idiot, on seieng the real Turkish-Israeli Flotilla exercise in Mediterian, and Erdogan's casting as a hero in the Arab imagination, he tuned 180 degree to ask Erdogan not to trust Arab traitors (The traitors are Syria, Hezbullah and Arab masses)
 
Finally don't miss reading the Zionist Advise posted below the other article calling Erdogan as New Nasser.
 
"The Muslim Arabs should be more careful choosing their hero`s of age."

**********************************************************
 
Jordan Times: Turkish PM Erdogan is the new Gamal Abdel Nasser

By Lamis Andoni

Gamal Abdel Nasser commanded an unrivalled influence over the Arab world during the 1960s[GALLO/GETTY]





A recent poll has revealed that 43 per cent of Palestinians in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip view Turkey as the regional country that is most supportive of their cause.

The survey was conducted following the deadly Israeli interception of a Gaza-bound international aid flotilla that claimed the lives of nine Turkish nationals.

Egypt, once the leader of the Arab world, came a very distant second, with just 13 per cent.

Wave of admiration




Although no similar polls were conducted elsewhere in the Arab world, press reports, opinion columns and the Turkish flags waved during anti-Israel protests, seem to indicate that Turkey is emerging as the new popular - or at least respected - regional leader.

Even Arab governments seem to have been swept up in this new wave of admiration for Turkey in the wake of its insistence on an apology for and an independent investigation into the deaths of its citizens.

Arab officials reportedly gave Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the Turkish prime minister, a very enthusiastic reception at the Turkish-Arab Economic Forum in Istanbul earlier this month.

The Turkish position simultaneously embarrasses many Arab governments by exposing their weakness vis-à-vis Israel, while also bolstering the official Arab stand against Israel's arrogant dismissal of Arab rights and demands.

Turkey is not perceived as a threat to Arab regimes as its influence does not undermine Arab governments at home.

Force for moderation



The Turkish prime minister has been cast as the new hero of the Palestinian cause [AFP]
While Turkey is ruled by an Islamic party, its influence over Islamic movements, particularly the Muslim Brotherhood, which leads the opposition in several Arab countries, is largely viewed as a moderating factor.

In fact, many Islamic writers view Turkey's ruling Justice and Development party (AKP) as the vanguard of a liberal Islamic movement seeking to take its rightful place in the international arena.

But the rise of Turkish influence is also a testimony to the decline of pan-Arab power and the absence of strong leadership in the Arab world.

Regional powers, such as Iran and Turkey, have stepped in to fill a leadership gap that has emerged partly as a result of Egypt's 1979 peace treaty with Israel, the US occupation of Iraq and the general decline in pan-Arab solidarity.

But while Iran, which is widely perceived as a strong counterbalance to Israel, is viewed with suspicion by most Arab governments and even members of the intelligentsia, Turkey is generally seen as less threatening and as a force for stability in the region.

The Arab street

Even as Turkey is attacked in the West for supposedly "turning eastward" and favouring its "cultural affinity" with Muslim countries, the Arab world continues to see it as a bridge to the West and a potential mediator with the US and Israel.

On the Arab street, however, a new image of Turkey is emerging that is not necessarily reflective of a realistic reading of the policies and statements made in Ankara.

In the wake of the flotilla carnage, the refusal of Turkish leaders to budge on their threats to suspend relations with Israel and, more significantly, their unequivocal demand that the Gaza blockade be lifted, has seen them portrayed in articles and on popular forums as the new leaders in "the Islamic world's struggle to liberate Palestine".


But this is a role Turkey has neither claimed nor coveted.

This casting of Turkey as the champion of the Palestinian cause derives partly from the comparison drawn between Turkey, whose leaders take their country's role and pride seriously, and meek Arab regimes who are vying to be accepted by the US and the West.

Countries and leaders who have challenged Israel and the West have always captured the imagination of the Arab masses, who seek an advocate in the battle against decades of colonialism, Western domination and injustice.

By calling off joint military maneuvers with his country's long-standing ally, Israel, after the latter's war against Gaza and by leaving the podium at Davos after an angry exchange with Shimon Peres, the Israeli president, Erdogan's casting as a hero in the Arab imagination was sealed.

But, while certainly benefiting from his growing personal clout and that of his country among Arabs and Muslims, the Turkish prime minister has not abandoned his declared goal of being a bridge between East and West, as opposed to a champion of the East against the West.

Neo-Ottoman ambition?



On the Arab street, Turkey has become the new champion of the Palestinian cause [EPA]
Erdogan's obvious high regard for his country's role and status has earned him the respect of even some of the most sceptical Arab intellectuals.

But others warn that Turkey's ambition - often described as neo-Ottoman by its critics - is more concerned with expanding Turkey's sphere of influence than championing just causes.

That may be so and Turkish leaders are open about bidding to become the most important interlocutor for the East - Arabs and Muslims - with the West.

Turkey's so far successful move to fill the leadership void in the region, does not, however, compensate for the absence of Arab leadership.

Erdogan is not the new Gamal Abdel Nasser, the late Egyptian president who commanded an unrivalled influence over the Arab intelligentsia and masses during the late 1950s and 1960s, until his premature death in 1970.

Neither he nor his outspoken intellectual foreign minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, are - or yearn to be - the saviours of Arabs and Muslims.

If anything Turkey could be a stabilising force in the Arab world, but only the Arab world can decide how that will benefit it.

The fact that Egypt came second in the Palestinian survey signals both the decline of the Egyptian leadership of the Arab world and the persistence of its special place in Arab politics.

NATO member Turkey stands to gain from being a mediator between the Arab world and Israel - speaking its mind and becoming a hero in the process.


But for Egypt, acting as the go-between between Israel and Arab states has only served to diminish its power. And Turkey's rising influence cannot compensate for that absence of an Arab leader, for it is neither its duty nor its role to protect Arab interests.

Lamis Andoni is an analyst and commentator on Middle Eastern and Palestinian affairs.
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial policy.

************************

Below is an Article written by Michel Nawfal (originaly posted at Jordan times) Via the Zionist site: News That Maters
Please read the Zionist's comment on the article

**************************************************

Jordan Times: Turkish PM Erdogan is the new Gamal Abdel Nasser

Jordan Times

The uncompromising positions of Erdogan, has led the led the Arab street to consider him like a new Gamal Abdel Nasser.
If Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogùan is the new Nasser, than who is Barack Hussein Obama?

This is a statement by Michel Nawfal in Jordan Times.

Nawfal is the authored of a book titled «The Return of Turkey to the Orient».

«The growing involvement of Turkey and its engagement in favour of the Palestinians, as well as the uncompromising positions of Erdogan, have led the Arab street to consider him like a new Gamal Abdel Nasser», said Michel Nawfal.

Turkey’s tough response to Israel’s raid on a Gaza-bound aid flotilla has cemented its popularity among Arabs, frustrated with their governments’ inability to face up to Israel, analysts say.

«Turkey is no longer considered the Trojan horse of the West in the region» said Nawfal. Turkey was the first Muslim country to establish diplomatic relations with Israel, and the two countries signed a military cooperation accord in 1996.

On Wednesday, Turkey’s parliament unanimously demanded the government review all political, economic and military ties with Israel. A day earlier, in an extraordinary session of Kuwait’s parliament, most deputies hailed what was called «the heroic stance of Ankara». And Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas was interrupted by a long round of applause during a speech when he mentioned Turkey’s role.

«This new role for Turkey», heir to the Ottoman Empire which ruled most of the Arab world for centuries until its defeat in World War I, «compensates for the weakness of Arab regimes», argued Nawfal.
«It also represents at the same time a positive equivalent to Iran’s» role in the region, he added.
Source: Jordan Times and Agence France-Presse.

*************************************************

My (Not MINE) comment:

The Muslim World seems to have learnt nothing from the past, their heavy loses in all the wars against the state of Israel.

Like Adolf Hitler lead the Germans to total defeat during World War II, Egyptian dictator Gamal Abdel Nasser lead the pan-Arabic war machine to total defeat in 1956 and 1967.

To fight Israel and harm the Jewish people will be the most stupid thing you will ever do.
The Bible says that God of Israel is the protector of the Jewish state, and that His enemies shall perish.

This does not mean that all Israel is doing is right. But do never harm her. Correct her in love, and stand with her in the Jewish people`s` time of trouble.

In regards to «This new role for Turkey as a heir to the Ottoman Empire», let me remind you:
The Ottoman Empire did not only side with the German Empire during World War I. This Islamic empire was responsible for the genocide of 1,5 million Armenians, in the days just before the «Ottomans» not so heroic collapse.

The Muslim Arabs should be more careful choosing their hero`s of age.

Read more about the Turkish genocide of Armenians:

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Saturday, 5 June 2010

You will have no protection

Alice Walker, The Electronic Intifada, 4 June 2010



You will have no protection

-- Medgar Evers to Civil Rights Activists in Mississippi, shortly before he was assassinated, 12 June, 1963

My heart is breaking; but I do not mind.

For one thing, as soon as I wrote those words I was able to weep. Which I had not been able to do since learning of the attack by armed Israeli commandos on defenseless peace activists carrying aid to Gaza who tried to fend them off using chairs and sticks. I am thankful to know what it means to be good; I know that the people of the Freedom Flotilla are/were in some cases, some of the best people on earth. They have not stood silently by and watched the destruction of others, brutally, sustained, without offering themselves, weaponless except for their bodies, to the situation. I am thankful to have a long history of knowing people like this from my earliest years, beginning in my student days of marches and demonstrations: for peace, for non-separation among peoples, for justice for Women, for People of Color, for Cubans, for Animals, for Indians, and for Her, the planet.

I am weeping for the truth of Medgar's statement; so brave and so true. I weep for him gunned down in his carport, not far from where I would eventually live in Mississippi, with a box of t-shirts in his arms that said: "Jim Crow Must Go." Though trained in the United States Military under racist treatment one cringes to imagine, he remained a peaceful soldier in the army of liberation to the end. I weep and will always weep, even through the widest smiles, for the beautiful young wife, Myrlie Evers, he left behind, herself still strong and focused on the truth of struggle; and for their children, who lost their father to a fate they could not possibly, at the time, understand. I don't think any of us could imagine during that particular phase of the struggle for justice, that we risked losing not just our lives, which we were prepared to give, but also our children, who we were not.

Nothing protected Medgar, nor will anything protect any of us; nothing but our love for ourselves and for others whom we recognize unfailingly as also ourselves. Nothing can protect us but our lives. How we have lived them; what battles, with love and compassion our only shield, we have engaged. And yet, the moment of realizing we are truly alone, that in the ultimate crisis of our existence our government is not there for us, is one of shock. Especially if we have had the illusion of a system behind us to which we truly belong. Thankfully I have never had opportunity to have this illusion. And so, every peaceful witnessing, every non-violent confrontation has been a pure offering. I do not regret this at all.

When I was in Cairo last December to support CODEPINK's efforts to carry aid into Gaza I was unfortunately ill with the flu and could not offer very much. I lay in bed in the hotel room and listened to other activists report on what was happening around the city as Egypt refused entry to Gaza to the 1,400 people who had come for the accompanying Freedom march. I heard many distressing things, but only one made me feel, not exactly envy, but something close; it was that the French activists had shown up, en masse, in front of their embassy and that their ambassador had come out to talk to them and to try to make them comfortable as they set up camp outside the building. This small gesture of compassion for his country's activists in a strange land touched me profoundly, as I was touched decades ago when someone in John Kennedy's White House (maybe the cook) sent out cups of hot coffee to our line of freezing student and teacher demonstrators as we tried, with our signs and slogans and songs, to protect a vulnerable neighbor, Cuba.

Where have the Israelis put our friends? I thought about this all night. Those whom they assassinated on the ship and those they injured? Is "my" government capable of insisting on respect for their dead bodies? Can it demand that those who are injured but alive be treated with care? Not only with care, but the tenderness and honor they deserve? If it cannot do this, such a simple, decent thing, of what use is it to the protection and healing of the planet? I heard a spokesman for the United States opine at the United Nations (not an exact quote) that the Freedom Flotilla activists should have gone through other, more proper, channels, not been confrontational with their attempt to bring aid to the distressed. This is almost exactly what college administrators advised half a century ago when students were trying to bring down apartheid in the South and getting bullets, nooses, bombings and burnings for our efforts. I felt embarrassed (to the degree one can permit embarrassment by another) to be even vaguely represented by this man: a useless voice from the far past. One had hoped.

The Israeli spin on the massacre: that the commandos were under attack by the peace activists and that the whole thing was like "a lynching" of the armed attackers, reminds me of a Redd Foxx joke. I loved Redd Foxx, for all his vulgarity. A wife caught her husband in bed with another woman, flagrant, in the act, skin to skin. The husband said, probably through pants of aroused sexual exertion: All right, go ahead and believe your lying eyes! It would be fun, were it not tragic, to compare the various ways the Israeli government and our media will attempt to blame the victims of this unconscionable attack for their own imprisonment, wounds and deaths.

So what to do? Rosa Parks sat down in the front of the bus. Martin Luther King followed her act of courage with many of his own, and using his ringing, compassionate voice he aroused the people of Montgomery, Alabama to commit to a sustained boycott of the bus company; a company that refused to allow people of color to sit in the front of the bus, even if it was empty. It is time for us, en masse, to show up in front of our conscience, and sit down in the front of the only bus we have: our very lives.

What would that look like, be like, today, in this situation between Palestine and Israel? This "impasse" that has dragged on for decades. This "conflict" that would have ended in a week if humanity as a whole had acted in defense of justice everywhere on the globe. Which maybe we are learning! It would look like the granddaughter of Rosa Parks, the grandson of Martin Luther King. It would look like spending our money only where we can spend our lives in peace and happiness; freely sharing whatever we have with our friends.

It would be to support boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) against Israel to End the Occupation of Gaza and the West Bank and by this effort begin to soothe the pain and attend the sorrows of a people wrongly treated for generations. This action would also remind Israel that we have seen it lose its way and have called to it, often with love, and we have not been heard. In fact, we have reached out to it only to encounter slander, insult and, too frequently, bodily harm.

Disengage, avoid, and withhold support from whatever abuses, degrades and humiliates humanity.

This we can do. We the people; who ultimately hold all the power. We the people, who must never forget to believe we can win.

We the people.

It has always been about us; as we watch governments come and go. It always will be.

Alice Walker is a poet, novelist, feminist and activist whose award-winning works have sold over ten million copies.

Image: Israeli soldiers stand guard as the Israeli navy raids one of the ships in the Freedom Flotilla. (Uriel Sinai/Getty Images)

Thursday, 20 May 2010

Former US Army Colonel Joins Freedom Flotilla To Break Gaza's Siege


Wednesday, 19 May 2010 15:33 Added by PT Editor Omar Ghraieb
4593222212_f850826e56Gaza, May 19, (Pal Telegraph) Ann Wright, retired U.S. Army Reserve Colonel and former U.S. diplomat who resigned in March, 2003 in opposition to Bush’s war on Iraq, will join the 8-ship Free Gaza boat flotilla that will break the Israeli government naval siege/blockade of Gaza and bring reconstruction materials and humanitarian assistance items to the Palestinians of Gaza.

The Blockade of Gaza is three years old and is suffocating the Palestinians of Gaza. After the 22 day Israeli attack on Gaza in December, 2009 through January, 2010 that killed 1440, wounded 5,000, left 50,000 homeless and destroyed most of the civilian infrastructure-water, sewage and electrical systems. No reconstruction materials have been allowed into Gaza by the Israeli or Egyptian governments.
Colonel Wright travelled three times into Gaza in 2009 and was an organizer for the Gaza Freedom March (www.gazafreedommarch.org) that brought 1350 persons from 44 countries to Cairo, Egypt to go into Gaza, but Egyptian authorities refused to allow the majority of the group to go into Gaza.
Colonel Wright said “the Israeli siege of Gaza is illegal and a violation of international law. We demand that the Israeli, Egyptian, United States and European governments end this siege. If the governments will not stop the siege, it is up to the citizens of the world to break it—and that is what we will do!”
Ms. Wright will depart the United States for Athens, Greece on May 19, 2010

Press Release

Gaza Freedom March
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Wednesday, 27 January 2010

IN GAZA THE WALLS DO THE TALKING

DesertPeace

January 27, 2010 at 10:05 am (Gaza, Israel, Palestine, War Crimes, zionist harassment)
GAZA WILL NOT GO DOWN
by Flora Nicoletta
Photo by Kelly VanPelt
“Neocolonialism is a new form of slavery”, a Gazan citizen.
The walls of Gaza are the unofficial Gazette of the Strip. On them one can follow what is going on. The walls are covered by scores of posters, pictures of martyrs, murals, slogans, calls, giant portraits of Yasser Arafat by the young artist Mohammad Ed-Derry, announcements…
At the end of the year the external wall of the Esh-Shifa hospital – months ago refreshed with coats of paint color rusty – was covered with more than twenty paintings depicting the Israeli war and the suffering of the people.

In Mustafa Hafez St, a superb mosaic was composed on the wall of the UNRWA HQ, near the main entrance. The mosaic is around 5 m. long and 4 m. large. It represents a group of Palestinians looking toward the sky. At the bottom is written “Gaza Freedom March 31.12.2009″. The master piece is made of bits of stone irregularly cut. With the reflect of the lights in the night, the mosaic become a firework and the small stones shine like thousands of stars or thousands of diamonds.
In Tal El-Hawa, the most elegant district of Gaza City, the compound of ministries, although heavily damages during the Israeli war last winter, is still standing. For a period of time the employees worked in the rubble in large beige tents crowned with small Palestinian flags. Sometime, someone wrote on an external wall: Why??!!…” One year after the Israeli offensive more graffiti have been added on a wall: “Gaza Free, No one can do for me, Only I can change my life”, “Sorry… Gaza”, “T’aime Palestine”, “Coming free Gaza”, “Gaza will not go down”, “27.12.2008″, i.e. the day the “Cast Lead” operation started.

Despite the suffocating siege imposes on the Gaza Strip, the coming of the New Year was celebrated as usual, but only in a few restaurants. On an eatery’s window in Tal El-Hawa is written with cotton wool: “Happy New Year 2010″. Exactly one year ago the Gazans were under smart Israeli bombardments.

On New Year’s Eve a group of 84 foreigners were taken to a cafeteria, The Gallery, where they attended a concert of hip-hop and ‘oud. After immense difficulties the activists were authorized to cross into Gaza, out of a group of more 1.400 stuck in Cairo. They arrived in the Strip late on Wednesday 30 December. Among them were four rabbis from Neturei Karta International, many Jews as well as Palestinians living abroad.

The 24-hour visit permit given by the Egyptians was extended in order to respect the Shabbat of the rabbis. However, the whole visit was spoiled due to a very unusual tight security and a fire which broke out on Shabbat day in the kitchen of the small and practically unknown El-Jazeera cafeteria. For a while there was panic in the hotel. The cafeteria is located on the seashore, just a few meters from the Commodore Gaza Hotel where the internationals were hosted, but also just a few steps from the firemen station. Nevertheless, the foreign activists said new words should be coined because they were unable to express their feelings for being in Gaza. The locals as well couldn’t contain their emotions.

A young American lady from the Freedom March For Gaza had collected around $19.000 in the USA, were telling us her mates. The money was spent in Egypt to buy goods for the besieged Gazans. All the goods were stored in a large hall in the Commodore Hotel and the hall was full. Many packs were still closed. On a table, at the back, there were what seemed to be medicines. Toward the end of the visit the last foreigners still in Gaza finished to fill Egyptian schoolbags with all sorts of stationery, toothbrushes, toothpaste, toys, etc. In addition, were brought from Egypt an amount of orange soda and potato ships.

In the end, the situation turned nasty and the American girl lost her temper because she couldn’t personally give the goods to the recipients of her choice. But really there was no time left. The rabbis said they would be ready to depart at 20:00 on Saturday. All the remaining foreigners should leave by that time. The Government was under heavy pressures from the Egyptian side. The Palestinian security tried all the possible gentile ways to convince the foreigners to leave. It was hard and we understood the desire of the foreigners to remain more in Gaza and their frustrations.

Therefore, the departure of the third bus at around 20:15, on Saturday 2 January, turned into a drama. The departure of the second bus shortly after 15:00 was already problematic: eleven foreigners were missing and those present refused to board the bus. Furthermore, on the bus a lovely Palestinian girl living in the States was weeping and repeating: “This is my country!!”.
When the US girl lost her temper in the Commodore hall, she shouted: “No to Hamas!’, meaning she didn’t want the goods to be taken by the Government; she also shouted to the stoic security men: “Your people is dying from hunger!”.

First of all, we presumed everything was done in good faith by the visiting group. But I was astonished by two facts: why the $19.000 or so were spent in Egypt? The cash money is necessary in Gaza, not in Egypt, and the shopkeepers need to sell. On top of that, why to buy in Egypt what is available in Gaza?

After a few days, on Wednesday 6 January, 482 internationals and 130 vehicles of humanitarian aid arrived from Egypt. The Viva Palestina convoy led by the British MP George Galloway included also Jews and Palestinians living abroad. The first British lady I met gave me the answer to my questions: “In Great Britain, it is said the Gazans are dying from starvation and almost eat rats. Thus you can understand why the goods were brought in Egypt by the previous solidarity group.”

Here, when such international rumors are repeated to the Gazans they are hurt, but they also laugh. Ahed assures that he eats better than in Great Britain… Sometimes, when we read articles and international reports about the Strip we don’t recognize it. There are in fact two different Gazas: one real on the ground and another one fabricated by the enemy propaganda or by inaccurate international reports. In the early 2000s, for instance. Christian Aid, a UK NGO, titled a report: “Gaza like Zimbabwe”. So far Gaza is not yet like Zimbabwe.

There was indeed a period of acute shortages in Gaza. It lasted for several months and was the peak of the crisis. Were lacking cash money, food, candles, small batteries, flour, cigarettes, paper for printing and photocopying, glue, shoes, cardboard boxes, nylon bags and everything one can imagine. But this period is over. It ended at the beginning of 2008 when one night militants demolished the iron wall left by the Israeli master at the border with Egypt, high 8 m. and long several kms. All the population of the besieged Strip invaded peacefully Egypt for around ten days – including newborns and elderly, entrepreneurs and businessmen – and brought home everything they could buy.

They are reports that are objective and depict accurately the real situation on the ground, like those of the Gaza-based Palestinian Center for Human Rights. Without exaggeration the situation is tragic and is deteriorating day after day. Life is impossible. However, the locals resist, are resilient and innovative, find new ways to remain alive under this form of modern slavery. On the other hand, international and local crocks are interested in making the situation more black than it is for their own benefits and for getting more funds.

For sure they are plenty of poor, jobless, miserable, disabled people and for sure not all of them receive sufficient aid. However, these people keep their dignity and don’t approach the foreigners lying and begging for help. Moreover, some local NGOs which are supposed to help them are well known for sucking the blood of the Palestinian people like vampires, in addition to other entities which are supposed to rescue them. The locals are fed up with all these crocks.

In Gaza nowadays nobody is dying from hunger. Despite the international embargo and the Israeli-imposed siege that has become routine now everything is available: biscuits, chocolate, clothing, toys, cigarettes, mobile phones, lab-tops, lingerie, cosmetics, perfumes, motorcycles, generators, refrigerators, washing machines… Furthermore, a good number of people eat red meat, chicken, turkey, pigeon, fish. The youth say they are doing miracles. The old militants say the Gazan people cannot be defeated. Paradoxically, absolutely everything is lacking in Gaza.
When asked what they need, the Gazans will never tell you they need a WFP bag of flour or USAID Refined Vegetable Oil Vitamin A Fortified. The Gazans will tell you they are hungry indeed, very hungry, but hungry for justice, democracy, freedom, independence. It’s all and it’s enough.

- Flora Nicoletta is an independent French journalist who lives in Gaza. She is currently working on her fourth book on the Palestinian question.

River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

Monday, 25 January 2010

ANOTHER DELEGATION RETURNS FROM GAZA ~~ ANOTHER REPORT

DesretPeace

January 25, 2010 at 12:21 pm (Activism, Associate Post, Gaza, Humanitarian Aid, International Solidarity, Israel, Palestine)
Commentary by Chippy Dee, Photos © by Bud Korotzer

Within the past week there have been 2 reports from people that participated in the Gaza Freedom March that took place, so to speak, in Cairo a month ago.  The first took place on January 14th  and was sponsored by Brooklyn for Peace, Jewish Voice for Peace, and the Peace and Social Action Committee of the Brooklyn Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) and took place at their Meeting House.  The purpose of the Gaza Freedom March was to bring Israel’s siege of Gaza, which is killing the people there, to the attention of the world, and in so doing, try to end it.  It was also to be a show of solidarity with the people of Gaza.

Ted Auerbach from Brooklyn for Peace was the first speaker and he also presented a slide show.  He said that all arrangements had been made to  enter Gaza through the Rafah crossing between Egypt and Gaza well in advance of the march.  However, 3 days before Egypt announced that they wouldn’t allow them to pass through – the crossing was being closed.  When the 1,460 marchers arrived in Cairo they spent the first few days trying to get Egypt to change their policy.  When it became clear that Egypt would not relent, the people there dealt with the new situation with creativity, solidarity, and courage.  Demonstrations are forbidden in Egypt but the participants, determined to make the world aware of the siege, braved the riot police and demonstrated all over Cairo.  They were joined by brave Egyptians who faced arrest or worse.  Hedy Epstein, an 85 year old holocaust survivor, went on a hunger strike along with 30 others.  Several French delegates climbed up a pyramid and unfurled a huge Palestinian flag.  When Egyptian security chased after them they escaped by climb up over the top escaping down the other side.

The second speaker, David Letwin, also from Brooklyn for Peace, gave an excellent report on the Cairo Declaration – the political document that was a product of the events in Cairo.  The South African delegation sent out a call for people to gather and, by consensus and collaboration, came up with a political plan for the immediate future.

The Declaration first lists the grievances and injustices the Palestinians suffer at the hands of Israel: collective punishment, illegal occupation, the apartheid wall, the deep wall being constructed between Gaza and Egypt, war crimes, discrimination and repression against Palestinian citizens within Israel, and the exile of millions of Palestinian refugees.  The repressive acts are, it says, based on the Zionist ideology.  The Declaration then reaffirms a commitment to Palestinian self-determination, ending the occupation, equal rights for all within historic Palestine, and the full right of return for Palestinian refugees.  To that end, the declaration calls for a global mass democratic anti apartheid movement to work in consultation with Palestinian civil society to implement the Palestinian call for boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) against Israel.  This will include visits and speeches from South African and Palestinian trade unionists to unions all over the world.  Participation in Israeli Apartheid Week (March 2010), a systemic unified approach to the boycott of Israeli products, developing the Academic, Cultural, and Sports boycott, and campaigns to encourage divestment of trade unions and pension funds from companies directly implicated in the occupation or in the Israeli military industries.  There would be legal actions targeting the external recruitment of soldiers to serve in the Israeli military, and the prosecution of Israeli war criminals, coordination of Citizen’s Arrest Bureaus, support for the Goldstone Report, and campaigns against the charitable status of the Jewish National Fund (JNF).  Individuals and organizations are invited to sign the declaration at http://cairodeclaration.org/lang/en-us/sign/

Letwin quoted Bishop Tutu saying, “We don’t want the crumbs from the table, we want the whole menu.” Letwin added, the civil rights movement in the US was not about getting a seat in the front of the bus.  It was about ending white supremacy in the south.  Operation Cast Lead was a result of the people of Gaza refusing to accept Israeli supremacy.  The Cairo Declaration reflects what the Palestinian people want and is being highly praised by Palestinian civil leaders.

Letwin ended his report by saying that all movements start out with a small group sticking to their beliefs and turning it, in time, into a mass movement.  He noted that truth goes through 3 phases: ridicule, attack, and self evident.
The final speaker was Adam Shapiro from the Free Gaza Movement.  He announced that they will send several boats, at least 6, including a cargo ship, full of building supplies to Gaza from Cyprus in March.

They are challenging the siege by sea.  Israel must be directly confronted.  He said that more people are getting involved than ever before and Free Gaza needs help and support from all of us.  The ships will constitute a nonviolent confrontation.  He praised the Gaza Freedom Marchers and the Cairo Declaration because it presented a plan for sustained direct action and it moves the plan away from peace and towards justice.  He concluded by suggesting that when activists discuss the Palestinian/Israel issue with others they stick with the principles of human rights and international law.

The 2nd report was on January 21st at Judson Memorial Church  in Greenwich Village.  The huge space was filled beyond capacity.  It was estimated that over 400 people were there.  Much that was said there had already been reported at the meeting in Brooklyn.  Jenna Bitar, from Hunter College High School, was in Cairo with her family.  She learned a lot and was very excited by the international solidarity, and by being able to bring attention to the siege.

Michael Ratner, President of the Center for Constitutional Rights was also there with his family.  When they saw that they wouldn’t be allowed into Gaza they remained in Cairo for a few days participating in the intense demonstrations and then they flew into Israel to spend some time in East Jerusalem and on the West Bank. While in East Jerusalem, Section C, they saw how Palestinians are being evicted from their homes there and are living on the streets while Jews take over their houses.  There is no legal justification for these evictions, he said.  One elderly Palestinian man pointed to his former home and told Ratner that he was made a refugee twice.  He was one of those evicted in Israel’s early history and again now.  The Ratner family joined a march of Jewish Israelis opposing the evictions.  Apples and water were thrown at them in West Jerusalem but they were welcomed in East Jerusalem.  He said that there are very few Israeli Jews opposing the actions of their government – their numbers are small and are shrinking.  When passing the Eretz crossing they saw 2 huge 15 foot photos of Shalit, the young soldier captured by Palestinians (and being held waiting for a prisoner exchange).  At one point the Ratners were able to look across a valley on the West Bank.  On the top of a hill they could see a settlement (colony) for 50,000 Jews.  The scene made the “noxious architecture of apartheid” very clear.  Visible was the dual system of roads, walls surrounding little Palestinian villages, or bantustans, olive trees uprooted, the open stealing of land.  The Jewish colony was all lush and green, 400 year old olive trees were planted everywhere, and there was a huge swimming pool.  Ratner said that his children were also stunned by the sight and asked how this could be going on and nobody is doing anything about it.  They also visited a Palestinian family in Hebron.  While on the roof of their house they were pelted by stones thrown by Jewish settlement children and were surprised by how empowered the children felt to throw the stones.  The Ratners left the area with a sense that a terrible crime was going on and that changing the situation was in the hands of militant activists everywhere.

The final speaker was Ali Abunimeh, a Palestinian American, and co-founder of Electronic Intifada.  Primarily he discussed the current situation in Gaza calling the 1.5 million people there “political prisoners.”  They have no way of changing their situation.  They are defenseless.  He said that “terrorism is defined as violence against civilians to create change by non-state actors.”  If the words ‘non-state’ were taken out it would describe what Israel was doing to Gaza.  But the world is coming to see that the blockade of Gaza, and the attack on the area, targets the children there.  Half the schools were bombed during Operation Cast Lead and 20% of the children suffer from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) with 90% of them having at least one criteria of PTSD.  Israel is no longer able to present the image of itself as a liberal democracy.  There is a severe and systemic repression against non-violent Palestinian protesters, and yet they continue to protest.  Israel is not renewing visas held by international solidarity workers, in fact they are deporting them.  Yet the worldwide movement against Israel’s policies keeps growing – rapidly.  Abunimeh expressed optimism that the opposition shown by the Gaza Freedom Marchers in Cairo will grow and spread.

When the meeting concluded representatives of the many organizations opposing Israel’s policies came forward and introduced themselves and their organizations.  They included AdalahNY, Brooklyn for Peace, CodePink, Jews Say No, Jewish Voice for Peace, Gaza Freedom March, Free Gaza, Wespac, Al-AwdaNY, Committee for an open Discussion of Zionism, Women in Black, and Middle East Crisis Response.  Contact information was collected from all people attending the event and it will be used if there is another attack on the Palestinian people.









River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian