Saturday 29 September 2012

AIPAC: Israel’s Agent Feeling Squeezed?



Franklin LambAl-Manar
Graphics by Alex
 

The American Israel public affairs committee (AIPAC) has seen headier days according to US congressional staffers forced to work regularly with the pro-Zionist agent of Israel. The grip of fear and the lock on Congress that the Israel first organization has long touted in its service to Israel may be weakening against a backdrop of American Jews rejecting the increasing rants of Prime Minister Netanyahu that are driving many Jews to distance themselves from him, from AIPAC, from other Arabphobic US Zionist organizations, and from Israel.







The old fashioned billboard on the side of the road, highway,
or railroad track is most arousing Zionist jitters these days.

 AIPAC tells some Congressional aids that fund raising is hurting and it can’t keep promises it made to certain candidates that it would arrange “indirect” funding for their current election campaigns. Netanyahu is increasing becoming the butt of jokes across the Israeli and American political spectrum. Several in his cabinet and the US Congress reportedly view him as an embarrassment. A perception likely added to by his recent General Assembly cartoon gimmick and his repeated Nazi style arm and hand gestures that were widely distributed by the main stream American media outlets especially Reuters, AP and even the Zionist Drudge Report.

In addition, there are signs that some members of congress and their staffs, who are heavily lobbied by AIPAC to donate, are beginning to chaff at heavy handed AIPAC fundraising tactics.

Perhaps reflecting financial pressures on its free spending policies including astronomical administration costs, on 9/24/12, Jonathan Missner, AIPAC’s Director of National Affairs and Development sent out more 500,000 emails in a desperate and thinly veiled bid to raise cash to defeat Obama.

Wrote Missner:

Dear Friend of Israel:

I am writing because we have not yet heard from you, and your support is greatly needed by September 30th.

As I’m sure you know, Israel and America are now facing serious threats throughout the Middle East. In recent months alone we have seen:
  • Protestors in multiple Arab countries storm U.S. embassies, burn American and Israeli flags, and chant "death to America, death to Israel," amidst false reports that a video was created by an Israeli Jew and backed by 100 Jewish financiers.
  • Iran sent military personnel and large quantities of weapons across to Syria to aid the Assad regime's violent crackdown.
  • A deadly terror attack along the Egypt-Israel border that killed 16 Egyptians and enabled terrorists to penetrate into Israel.
  • Leaders in Iran and its regional proxies increased their vitriol against Israel. The frequency and intensity of these recent statements has been troubling: “Anyone who loves freedom and justice must strive for the annihilation of the Zionist regime." Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (August 17th).
  • If you’re like most pro-Israel Americans, these events have made you more scared for Israel’s existence than you’ve likely felt in many years.
  • But as you watch these dangers continue to unfold, it is important to remember there is something you can do to help keep Israel safe.
  • You can join AIPAC, and help ensure that our leaders in Washington speak out clearly and unequivocally in support of Israel and that the aggressions shown toward our greatest ally Israel must immediately cease.
  • At this dangerous time, the number one strategic answer to the threats facing Israel is for America to express – in every possible way- an unwavering, unshakable commitment to Israel.
  • We must ensure that President Obama speaks out for Israel.
  • We must ensure that America stands by its full commitment to Israel’s security assistance for fiscal year 2013, which is vital for Israel to be able to defend herself.
  • And we must ensure that America continues to pledge 100% of its diplomatic support to Israel.
  • We must do all of this, so that we can send a strong and loud message that America stands by Israel and that any attacks on Israel’s security is an attack on America’s security.”



AIPAC appears to be failing in carrying orders from the Israeli Embassy in Washington “to defeat Obama, whatever is required.” The latest polls, including two commissioned by the American Jewish Committee and one from the Anti-Defamation League shows Obama likely avoiding the defeat on November 6th that Tel Aviv hoped his combative attitude toward Israel would produce. Obama currently leads Mitt Romney by a 69-20 percent margin among likely Jewish voters. If these polls hold, while they represent a marked decline from the 78 percent of the Jewish vote Obama got in 2008, they show Romney’s promise to put Israel “first no matter what “ is not resonating with American Jews. By now even garnering 25% of the Jewish vote this shows there is plenty of resistance to Romney on a variety of domestic social issues that increasingly among the American public matter more that Israel’s zany schemes. The poll projections may have been reflected at the UN last week when Netanyahu appeared to back off a bit from his pillorying of the Obama administration as being weak on terrorism.
Meanwhile, according to an Arab American Institute poll, 52 percent of all Arab-Americans say they plan to vote for Obama, compared to 28 percent who have declared their support for Romney. Broken down by religion, Arab American Muslims support Obama overwhelmingly (75% to 8%), while Orthodox/Protestants support Romney by a 16% margin. According to the poll, Arab American Democrats outnumber Republicans by a 2-1 margin (46% to 22%), continuing a steady migration away from the GOP toward the Democratic Party since 2002.
Congressional staffers report that the Obama White House is rejecting the tactics being employed behind its back to assert pressure for the “red lines” that Netanyahu’s has been pushing and is aware that AIPAC is actively working to defeat President Obama on November 6th.
Zionist Premier Benjamin Netanyahu drawing the red line for Iran at the UNGA in New YorkWhat is confusing much of the American Jewish community appears to be the same as what perplexes a growing segment of the non-Jewish American public. And that is Netanyahu’s nonsense over Iranian progress in having nuclear weapons and the history of this “the sky is falling-we must cry wolf!” canard.
It was back in April of 1984, that the British defense magazine Jane’s Defense Weekly got things started with its false claim that Iran was “engaged in the production of an atomic bomb, likely to be ready within two years.”
Jane’s became embarrassed since it could offer no proof to back its sensationalist claim and soon admitted that its speculation was based on a West German intelligence source which turned out to be an assistant engineer who visited the unfinished Bushehr nuclear reactor that year and became curious. Soon, a pillar of the US Zionist US Senator Alan Cranston’s lobby picked up on the report and declared that Iran would have nuclear weapons by 1991.
 
The next year, Benjamin Netanyahu, a onetime campaign volunteer for Cranston, now an Israeli parliamentarian, began a campaign to inform the World that Iran could develop nuclear weapons within “three to five years” and therefore must be stopped through “an international front headed by the US.”
Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld joined the project and reported to Congress in 1998 that Iran could build an intercontinental ballistic missile with a nuclear or a biological payload that could hit the US within five years. Secretary of State Colin Powell soon claimed in 2004 that if fact, Iran had been working on technology to fit a nuclear warhead onto a missile.
 
These allegations boldly came from Powell’s less than one year after his Iraqi weapons of mass destruction assertions were being proven to be false.
 
The current President of Israel Shimon Peres announced in 1992 that Iran would have nuclear weapons by 1999. As noted by Robert Fisk in the UK Independent, current Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak said in 1996 that Iran would have a nuclear arsenal by 2004.
For his part, Netanyahu reportedly got into an ugly argument with the American ambassador to Israel last month over the Obama administration’s unwillingness to take matters regarding Iran to a more aggressive level. The Israeli prime minister was, according to the New York Times, “at his wit’s end” because, he claimed, Iran was “only four to six weeks away from a nuclear bomb”. A few weeks later, Netanyahu backtracked and pushed the deadline “to six or seven months away.”
And round and round it goes.
Congressional sources insist that White House staff will not forget Netanyahu’s blatant attempts to humiliate and defeat their boss.
The American public, as well as the international community are exhibiting exhaustion over this incessant hysteria which was summed up recently by Professor Stephen M. Walt, writing in Foreign Policy.
“Those prophesying war with Iran are starting to sound like those wacky cult leaders who keep predicting the End of the World, and then keep moving the date when the world doesn't end on schedule. At what point are we going to stop paying attention?”
One Congressional source emailed:
“Time will tell if next year’s AIPAC conference finds President Obama or any of his top aides on its program.”
 Franklin LambFranklin Lamb is doing research in Lebanon. He is reachable c\o fplamb@gmail.com
Beirut Mobile: +961-70-497-804
Office: +961-01-352-127

 
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

 

Red Line To Israel and Jewish Power Now!


DateFriday, September 28, 2012 at 8:37AM AuthorGilad At

 
Once again, the democratically elected leader of the institutionally genocidal Israel is trying to push us all into a world war.
Time is ripe to draw a red line to the Jewish State and its powerful lobby.
It is time to dismantle the Jewish State by means of total isolation before it turns our planet into dust.



  
The wandering who- Gilad Atzmon

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Who supports terror?


DateThursday, September 27, 2012 at 7:56AM AuthorGilad Atzmon


River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Torah Jews meet President Ahmadinejad in NYC


DateSaturday, September 29, 2012 at 4:06PM AuthorGilad Atzmon
The Torah Jews are the only anti Zionist Jewish collective. They are just very few but their message is clear, coherent and consistent.



 



River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

The New Yorker: "The ridiculous deserves ridicule"


FLC

"... I know that the subject is serious; that is just one reason why the graphic, which he apparently made at Kinkos, is so ridiculous. And if Israeli intelligence thinks that’s what a real bomb looks like, maybe their other projections are off as well. I’m surprised he could get that thing past U.N. security.
Anyway, with the justification that the ridiculous deserves ridicule, I invite you to pile it on, using this photo as the basis for a caption contest.
I’ll start the ball rolling with one of mine own:
”And, what’s worse, if Wile E. Coyote ever gets hold of this, the Roadrunner is toast.”..."

'Why Qatar wants to invade Syria'


By Pepe Escobar

Make no mistake; the Emir of Qatar is on a roll.

What an entrance at the UN General Assembly in New York; Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani called for an Arab coalition of the willing-style invasion of Syria, no less. [1]

In the words of the Emir, "It is better for the Arab countries themselves to interfere out of their national, humanitarian, political and military duties, and to do what is necessary to stop the bloodshed in Syria." He stressed Arab countries had a "military duty" to invade.

What he means by "Arab countries" is the petromonarchies of the Gulf Counter-Revolution Club (GCC), previously known as Gulf Cooperation Council - with implicit help from Turkey, with which the GCC has a wide-ranging strategic agreement. Every shisha house in the Middle East knows that Doha, Riyadh and Ankara have been weaponizing/financing/providing logistical help to the various strands of the armed Syrian opposition engaged in regime change.

The Emir even quoted a "similar precedent" for an invasion, when "Arab forces intervened in Lebanon" in the 1970s. By the way, during a great deal of the 1970s the Emir himself was engaged in more mundane interventions, such as letting his hair down alongside other Gulf royals in select Club Med destinations, as this photo attests (he's the guy on the left).

'The Emir, in Club Med camouflage!'

 So is the Emir now preaching an Arab version of the R2P ("responsibility to protect") doctrine advanced by The Three Graces of Humanitarian Intervention (Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and Samantha Power)?

This is certainly bound to go down well in Washington - not to mention Ankara and even Paris, considering French president Francois Hollande has just called for UN protection of "liberated zones" in Syria.

As for the Emir's Lebanon precedent, that's not exactly uplifting, to say the least. The so-called Arab Deterrent Force of 20,000 soldiers that entered Lebanon to try to contain the civil war overstayed its welcome by no less than seven years, turned into a Syrian military occupation of northern Lebanon, left officially in 1982 and still the civil war kept raging.

Imagine a similar scenario in Syria - on steroids.

A 'pretty influential guy'

As for the Emir's humanitarian - not to mention democratic - ardor, it's enlightening to check out what US President Barack Obama thinks about it. Obama - who defines the Emir as a "pretty influential guy" - seems to imply that even though "he himself is not reforming significantly" and "there's no big move towards democracy in Qatar", just because the emirate's per capita income is humongous, a move towards democracy is not so pressing.
 
So let's assume the Emir is not exactly interested in turning Syria into Scandinavia. That opens the way to an inevitable motive - connected to, what else, Pipelineistan.

Vijay Prashad, author of the recent Arab Spring, Libya Winter, is currently writing a series on the Syria Contact Group for Asia Times Online. He got a phone call from an energy expert urging him to investigate "the Qatari ambition to run its pipelines into Europe." According to this source, "the proposed route would have run through Iraq and Turkey. The former transit country is posing to be a problem. So much easier to go north (Qatar has already promised Jordan free gas)."

Even before Prashad concludes his investigation, it's clear what Qatar is aiming at; to kill the US$10 billion Iran-Iraq-Syria gas pipeline, a deal that was clinched even as the Syria uprising was already underway. [2]

Here we see Qatar in direct competition with both Iran (as a producer) and Syria (as a destination), and to a lesser extent, Iraq (as a transit country). It's useful to remember that Tehran and Baghdad are adamantly against regime change in Damascus.

The gas will come from the same geographical/geological base - South Pars, the largest gas field in the world, shared by Iran and Qatar. The Iran-Iraq-Syria pipeline - if it's ever built - would solidify a predominantly Shi'ite axis through an economic, steel umbilical cord.

Qatar, on the other hand, would rather build its pipeline in a non-"Shi'ite crescent" way, with Jordan as a destination; exports would leave from the Gulf of Aqaba to the Gulf of Suez and then to the Mediterranean. That would be the ideal plan B as negotiations with Baghdad become increasingly complicated (plus the fact the route across Iraq and Turkey is much longer).

Washington - and arguably European customers - would be more than pleased with a crucial Pipelineistan gambit bypassing the Islamic Gas Pipeline.

And of course, if there's regime change in Syria - helped by the Qatari-proposed invasion - things get much easier in Pipelineistan terms. A more than probable Muslim Brotherhood (MB) post-Assad regime would more than welcome a Qatari pipeline. And that would make an extension to Turkey much easier.

Ankara and Washington would win. Ankara because Turkey's strategic aim is to become the top energy crossroads from the Middle East/Central Asia to Europe (and the Islamic Gas Pipeline bypasses it). Washington because its whole energy strategy in Southwest Asia since the Clinton administration has been to bypass, isolate and hurt Iran by all means necessary. [3]

That wobbly Hashemite throne


All this points to Jordan as an essential pawn in Qatar's audacious geopolitical/energy power play. Jordan has been invited to be part of the GCC - even though it's not exactly in the Persian Gulf (who cares? It's a monarchy).

One of the pillars of Qatar's foreign policy is unrestricted support for the MB - no matter the latitude. The MB has already conquered the presidency in Egypt. It is strong in Libya. It may become the dominant power if there's regime change in Syria. That brings us to Qatar's help to the MB in Jordan.
At the moment, Jordan's Hashemite monarchy is wobbly - and that's a transcendental understatement.

There's a steady influx of Syrian refugees. Compound it with the Palestinian refugees that came in waves during the crucial phases of the Arab-Israeli war, in 1948, 1967 and 1973. Then add a solid contingent of Salafi-jihadis fighting Damascus. Only a few days ago one Abu Usseid was arrested. His uncle was none other than Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the infamous former head of al-Qaeda in Iraq, killed in 2006. Usseid was about to cross the desert from Jordan to Syria.

Amman has been mired in protests since January 2011 - even before the spread of the Arab Spring. King Abdullah, also known as King Playstation, and photogenic Washington/Hollywood darling Queen Rania, have not been spared.

The MB in Jordan is not the only player in the protest wave; unions and social movements are also active. Most protesters are Jordanians - who historically have been in control of all levels of state bureaucracy. But then neo-liberalism reduced them to road kill; Jordan went through a savage privatization drive during the 1990s. The impoverished kingdom now depends on the IMF and extra handouts from the US, the GCC and even the EU.

Parliament is a joke - dominated by tribal affiliation and devotion to the monarchy. Reforms are not even cosmetic. A prime minister was changed in April and most people didn't even noticed it. In an Arab world classic, the regime fights demands for change by increasing repression.

Into this quagmire steps Qatar. Doha wants King Playstation to embrace Hamas. It was Qatar that promoted the meeting in January between the King and Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal - who had been expelled from Jordan in 1999. That left indigenous Jordanians wondering whether the kingdom would be swamped by yet another wave of Palestinian refugees.

Arab media - most of it controlled by the House of Saud - has been drowning in stories and editorials predicting that after the MB ascends to power in Damascus, Amman will be next. Qatar, though, is binding its time. The MB wants Jordan to become a constitutional monarchy; then they will take over politically after an electoral reform that King Abdullah has been fighting against for years.
Now the MB can even count on the support of Bedouin tribes, whose traditional allegiance to the Hashemite throne has never been wobblier. The regime has ignored protests at its own peril. The MB has called for a mass demonstration against the King on October 10. The Hashemite throne is going down, sooner rather than later.
It's unclear how Obama would react - apart from praying that nothing substantial happens before November 6. As for the Emir of Qatar, he has all the time in the world. So many regimes to fall - and become Muslim Brothers; so many pipelines to build.

Notes:
1. Qatar's emir calls for Arab-led intervention in Syria, The National, Sep 26, 2012.
2. Syria's Pipelineistan war, Al Jazeera, Aug 6, 2012.
3. Qatar: Rich and Dangerous, Oilprice.com, Sep 17, 2012.

Pepe Escobar is the author of Globalistan: How the Globalized World is Dissolving into Liquid War (Nimble Books, 2007) and Red Zone Blues: a snapshot of Baghdad during the surge. His most recent book is Obama does Globalistan (Nimble Books, 2009).

He may be reached at pepeasia@yahoo.com

(Copyright 2012 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.) 

In The Open - Israel is trying to push US into war with Iran


 


The wandering who- Gilad Atzmon

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

US Says Libya Attackers Linked to Al-Qaeda


Local Editor
 
The US intelligence community said that attack on a US consulate in Libya was by militants linked to al-Qaeda, but noted that "many unanswered questions" remained.
US ambassador to Libya killed
"It remains unclear if any group or person exercised overall command and control of the attack, and if extremist group leaders directed their members to participate," Shawn Turner, spokesman for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, said in a statement Friday.
"We do assess that some of those involved were linked to groups affiliated with, or sympathetic to Al-Qaeda."

US Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the assault.

"As we learned more about the attack, we revised our initial assessment to reflect new information indicating that it was a deliberate and organized terrorist attack carried out by extremists," Turner explained.

But Turner stressed that despite "progress" made in the investigation, "there remain many unanswered questions."



River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

9/11 Certainly a False Flag Operation: Mark Dankof



Almost two weeks have passed since the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, and scholars, journalists and authors are still trying to figure out the hidden realities behind the “most hideous terrorist attacks ever perpetrated in American soil,” as described by Victor Argothy of the University of Delware’s Disaster Research Center.


American journalist and radio host Mark Dankof
Israel’s involvement in the 9/11 attacks and the possibility that it might have been a false flag operation with the objective of laying the groundwork to attack Afghanistan, Iraq and other Muslim nations are among the most popular theories which the members of 9/11 Truth Movement have proposed.

Mark Dankof believes that they were the Israelis who masterminded and perpetrated the 9/11 attacks, and believes that there’s abundant evidence confirming this speculation.
On the 11th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks, I conducted an in-depth interview with Mark Dankof to examine his viewpoints regarding the events that led to the collapsing of the twin towers of the World Trade Center, the traces of the footsteps of Israel in the attacks and the reasons why the United States and Israel employed these attacks to launch an all-out war against the Muslim world. What follows is the text of this interview.

Q: Mark, in your writings and broadcasts about 9/11, you’ve talked about the Israeli foreknowledge of the attacks. Is there compelling evidence to verify this? Do you mean that Israel was somehow involved in the attacks or may have benefited from them in one way or another?

A: I will reiterate what I said on Press TV. I believe Dr. Alan Sabrosky of the U. S. Army War College is correct. The Israeli Mossad pulled off the 9/11 attacks. They had the motive, the means, the opportunity, and the network in the domestic United States to keep their involvement from public exposure. As Dr. Sabrosky puts it, “It is 100% certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation. Period.”

It was my broadcast colleague, Mark Glenn of The Ugly Truth, who did the initial exclusive interview on the air with Sabrosky, when the Good Doctor finally went public with what he knew. That single broadcast was the pivotal event on the airwaves internationally which began the process of unraveling the essence of what really happened and why, on September 11, 2001.

Consider just a few of the facts discussed by Dr. Robert Sungenis in his two-part series for Dr. E. Michael Jones’ Culture Wars (July/August 2012 edition and the current September 2012 edition available online). The Sungenis series is an extended review of Christopher Bollyn’s book, “Solving 9/11: The Deception That Changed the World.” Many of these facts are also accessible online through Wikispooks through their dossier entitled, “9/11: Israel Did It.”
Fact: The BBC reported on September 23, 2001 that most of the “nineteen Muslims” are still alive. Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI noted that the reason bin Laden and the Taliban have never been officially accused by the United States for orchestrating 9/11 is “because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.” Dick Cheney stated in an interview with Tony Snow on March 26, 2006 that “We’ve never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming.” Robert Muller of the FBI admitted the same when he stated that, “In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper either here in the U. S. or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere that mentioned any aspect of the September 11th plot.”
Fact: Zionist Jew and Netanyahu pal, Larry Silverstein, obtained the lease for the Twin Towers just ten weeks before 9/11. He doubled the insurance and included a clause for “terrorists’ acts.” When it came time to collect, Silverstein claimed there were two incidents of “terror” since two buildings were hit by planes, which allowed him to seek for double indemnity. His victory in court was overseen by Zionist Jew Michael B. Mukasey. Silverstein later gave conflicting accounts of why he was not eating breakfast at the Windows of the World restaurant at the Twin Towers on 9/11, a complete departure from his usual routine. Or why his son, Roger, and daughter, Lisa did not show up for work as usual at the World Trade Center on that fateful morning. Take a look at what Bollyn, Sungenis, and Wikispooks chronicle about the astounding list of high-profile Zionist Jews connected to the Twin Tower complex who were all conveniently missing from the area on 9/11. Frank Lowy; Lewis Eisenberg; Ronald S. Lauder; Jules Kroll; Jerome Hauer. This is all especially interesting given the Jerusalem Post report that the foreign ministry of Israel had the names of 4,000 Israelis believed to be in the area of the Twin Towers or the Pentagon at the time of the attacks, yet only one Israeli is known to have died that morning. How did all of these Jews know to be absent that morning?

Maybe it has something to do with the admission of Jewish-run company Odigo [later purchased by Comverse Infosys, an Israeli company which specializes in phone and wiretapping] which had offices two blocks from the Twin Towers, that two of its employees received instant messages warning of a large-scale attack two hours before the planes hit the Twin Towers. The Israeli newspaper, Haaretz, carried the story. Two weeks after 9/11, the Vice President of Odigo, Alex Diamandis stated, “The messages said something big was going to happen in a certain amount of time, and it did–almost to the minute.” Bollyn and Sungenis note another oddity in all of this: the Israeli company, ZIM, which vacated its 10,000 square foot office space in the North Twin Tower only a few days before 9/11 even though the company lease ran to the end of 2001, losing $50,000 in the process. When the FBI’s Michael Dick began an investigation of this suspicious activity, Michael Chertoff removed him from the case.

Chertoff is an Israeli citizen; his cousin, Benjamin Chertoff, wrote the infamous article for Popular Mechanics that attempted to support the U. S. government’s position on 9/11 and to defuse the sharp criticism of American physicists and scientists which definitively stated that the official story of how the Towers came down was a scientific absurdity and impossibility. Chertoff’s mother, Livia Eisen, had been an agent for the Israeli Mossad. Chertoff also played a major role in the prosecution of the 1993 False Flag terror bombing of the World Trade Center eight years before. As Bollyn and Sungenis tell it, and as Wikispooks narrates the story, Chertoff was assigned the investigation of the aftermath of 9/11 as the Assistant Attorney General. He had the final authority on the removal of the steel girders from ground zero. This removal of crime evidence was undertaken by scrapyards and junkyards that were Zionist-owned. Two of the junkyards were Hugo Neu Schnitzer East and Metals Management Northeast. Hugo Neu is a Jewish immigrant. He invests Israeli venture capital with Nir Belzer who is the senior manager of Israel’s Millennium Materials Technologies Funds with Oren Gafri. Gafri served as an executive with Israeli Aircraft Industries, Ltd., Bedek division, which specialized in aircraft conversion. Gafri also trained in Israel’s nuclear program, including explosive coatings of super-thermite (the kind found in the dust of 9/11). It was another Zionist, Yoram Shalmon of PowerLoc Technologies, who contracted to remove the 250 tons of steel girders from ground zero.


In the case of Michael Chertoff, he was later made the head of the Department of Homeland Security. He used the Sensitive Security Information program to confiscate evidence to forestall investigation into 9/11, including the confiscation of the three private video tapes of the attack on the Pentagon. These tapes have never been released.

Then there is Philip Zelikow, an Israeli citizen like Chertoff. He ends up as the writer of the official United States Government Report on 9/11.
Fact: Steel melts only at 2,777 degrees Fahrenheit. Jet fuel burns no hotter than 1,517 degrees Fahrenheit. There was nothing in the World Trade Center buildings, barring explosives and thermite that could burn hotter than jet fuel. Strong circumstantial evidence suggests that a sophisticated form of super-thermite had been applied to large sections of the World Trade Center.
There are interesting super-thermite connections in this case when one considers the logical possibilities. There is the aforementioned Oren Gafri connection. Gafri served as an executive with Israeli Aircraft Industries, Ltd., Bedek division, which specialized in aircraft conversion. Gafri also trained in Israel’s nuclear program, including explosive coatings of super-thermite (the kind found in the dust of 9/11).

There may be another damning super-thermite connection Ehud Barak, the prime minister of Israel until March of 2001, came to the United States shortly after leaving office, as reported by Bollyn and Sungenis. He came, ostensibly, to work as a special advisor for Electronic Data Systems and as a consultant with SCP Partners, a Mossad-run private equity company focused on “security related” work … was his real cover to oversee the 9/11 attacks? Bollyn clearly suspects this on the basis of the fact that in 2001, SCP Partners did business with Metallurg Holding, Inc., as well as Advanced Metallurgical Group, N. V. (AMG), both sharing the same Wayne, PA address. AMG specializes in the production of super-thermite, and others which manufacture specialized coatings of nano-composites. This is the same Ehud Barak who was in the London studio of the BBC within minutes of the explosive demolitions of the Twin Towers on 9/11, declaring minus any evidence of culpability that there needed to be a “War on Terror” and “U. S. military intervention in Afghanistan.” Is this a case of the real perpetrator assigning the blame to convenient and demonized enemies?
 

Bollyn mentions two other interesting connections. LVI Group, Inc. and Controlled Demolition, Inc., which had previously done multi-million dollar contracts of research and development for the Department of Defense in areas of “asbestos abatement” and “preparing structures for demolition prior to the placement of charges.” And what may be the clincher in terms of troubling circumstantial evidence: Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). SAIC provided all the experts who wrote papers for the NIST investigation of 9/11. It headed the investigation of the 1993 WTC bombing; it makes nanothermites through its subsidiary, Applied Ordinance Technology, and subcontracts to the Central Intelligence Agency to spy on CIA employees. It has employed Robert Gates and John Deutsch.

One thing is sure. Israelis Michael Chertoff and Philip Zelikow are not about to allow extensive examination and investigation of these disturbing pieces of information and the connections they suggest. They will debunk the insistence of American physicists like Stephen Jones of Brigham Young University that the scientific facts disprove the official conclusions. They will ignore the trails on accessibility to nano-thermite. They will ignore the questions surrounding Larry Silverstein’s obtaining of the Towers and the highly profitable character of the insurance arrangement that made him a ton of money. They will ignore the Odigo connection in terms of establishing Israeli foreknowledge of the event. They will ignore the fact that Building 7 of the World Trade Center came down instantaneously in its own footprint as the other buildings did, but without being struck by an airplane, what Alan Sabrosky terms “the tipping point.”

Then there is the Chertoff/Zelikow concealment of the Five Dancing Israelis on 9/11 who were arrested and later quietly allowed to return to Israel, courtesy of a direct order from Michael Chertoff. These Five Dancing Israelis were jumping for joy and photographing themselves with the collapse of the Twin Towers in the background, first in Liberty State Park after the initial impact. Later, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken, New Jersey, and subsequently in a parking lot in Jersey City. Residents of the area called police. The Israeli men were posing as Arabs running a New Jersey moving company. Two of the five were later positively identified as agents of the Israeli Mossad. These individuals were carrying multiple passports, thousands of dollars in cash, and tested positive for explosives as reported only by the Bergen Record in Paolo Lima, New Jersey. Three vans traced to these five Israelis were seized, one prior to the Lincoln Tunnel; another at the George Washington Bridge; the final one on King Street between 6th and 7th which the Israelis fled after they blew it up. The moving company which owned these vans, Urban Moving Systems (UMS), was a Mossad front. The two Mossad agents in this operation were the Kurzberg brothers, Paul and Sivan. Dominic Suter, another Mossad agent, was the registered owner of Urban Moving Systems (UMS), and allowed to flee the United States for Israel by the FBI on September 14, 2001, courtesy of Chertoff’s directive. After Suter’s escape, the other 5 men failed lie detector tests but still were allowed to flee. Three of these men, Oded Ellner, Omer Marmari, and Yaron Schmuel, show up on Israeli television in November 2001. Ellner took the lead on that show, and said that “Our purpose was to document the 9/11 event.” This too proves Israeli foreknowledge, as does the Odigo incident.
Fact: The American airport which was at the center of the 9/11 operation was Boston’s Logan Airport. Who provided security at that airport on that fateful day? The Israeli airport security firm International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS) is the answer.
Fact: Who had control of security at the World Trade Center since 1987? The answer is the Israeli Mossad, as documented by Christopher Bollyn. In 1987, the Mossad procured the contract under the name of Atwell Security, a subsidiary of the Eisenberg Group under Shaul Eisenberg of the Mossad. The New York representative for Atwell at that time was Peter Zvi Malkin, who joined the Israeli Haganah at age twelve, nabbed Adolf Eichmann in 1960, and was an explosives expert. Malkin worked closely with Rafael “Dirty Rafi” Eitan, the senior Mossad agent who ran the Jonathan Pollard espionage operation in the 1980s while working out of the Israeli Embassy in Washington, and who also ran the PROMIS computer software alternation plot. The PROMIS plot enabled Israel and Communist China to siphon American nuclear secrets from Los Alamos Nuclear Laboratories, using Israeli asset and British media mogul Robert Maxwell as the broker of the altered computer program. My review of Gordon Thomas’s Seeds of Fire will brief your readers and viewers on this one.

The Atwell/Mossad security contract for the World Trade Center, as Bollyn and Sungenis tell it, was one the Port Authority of New York felt compelled to cancel in 1987 when it was revealed that one Avraham Shalom Ben-Dor, former head of the Israeli Shin Bet, was running the Atwell contract while working with Rafi Eitan. Bollyn and Sungenis also tell us that the cancellation of this contract forced Mossad to come up with a new one, which they did. Jules Kroll and Kissinger connected-Maurice Greenberg, the CEO of the bailed out AIG Insurance Company, Jackie Kennedy boyfriend, and associate of Shaul Eisenberg of the Asian branch of the Mossad, put it together.

This is the tip of the Israeli connections in this case, as Christopher Bollyn and Robert Sungenis put it together. Sungenis has done a couple of radio shows with me on the subject. Bollyn’s book and Sungenis’ review cover much, much more, including the Ptech-Guardium network.

Q: The mainstream media and influential Jewish groups in the United States vilify the critics of the official accounts of the 9/11 attacks as conspiracy theorists and rebuff their arguments about the possible involvement of Mossad in the attacks. What do you think in this regard? How should the 9/11 Truth Movement uphold its objectives and confront the defamation and smear campaign headed by the state-owned mainstream media?

A: The only course of action is to continue to present the known facts, first on the scientific evidence, secondly on the party that had the motive, the means, the opportunity, and the resources to cover up the deed after the fact. We are less than candid when we fail to acknowledge that the Zionist control of the six major American media conglomerates is monolithic, and makes Corporate Media a purchased accomplice in what is going on. This fact, and Zionist control of the Federal Reserve Board (money supply) and Presidential and Congressional elections through PAC money and media control, makes for a completely unlevel playing field. In the case of the 9/11 Truth Movement, the chief strategy is clearly the utilization of the Internet, and foreign media outlets and journalists, to get the word out domestically and internationally. We have to do an end run around Corporate Media, their ownership, their agents of influence, and pursue guerrilla strategies. This is what Mark Glenn and I are doing with The Ugly Truth, and with our occasional appearances on Press TV and Russia Today. We have no money, no corporate benefactors, and plenty of adversaries with a lot of animosity toward us and plenty of their own benefactors in marginalizing us professionally with demonization and malicious untruth on the Internet.
The job that Republican congressional candidate in Maryland, Kenneth R. Timmerman, attempted to do on me with the help of an ex-friend of mine, Howard Phillips of the Constitution Party and Washington’s Conservative Caucus, in a piece for the Richard Mellon Scaife-financed Accuracy in Media entitled, “Tehran TV Loves Ron Paul,” is a case in point. This goes back to an article I wrote in 2007. Timmerman threatened to sue me if I didn’t withdraw the piece. I didn’t withdraw. He then resorted to the sort of thing that appeared this year in Accuracy in Media. This is the way it is. I have since commented on Timmerman in a radio broadcast of September 5th, 2012. I have also responded to Howard Phillips in writing. You can evaluate the evidence for yourself on what is going on here. Mantiq al-Tayr covered some of these shenanigans in Stealth Zionism. What is important to see here is the extent to which the American Right specifically, and the American political and journalistic enterprise generally, has been hijacked by these Zionist Agents of Influence. This even includes elements of the Libertarian Party, as I recently demonstrated in my piece on Wayne Allyn Root.
It all points to Israel. The American public needs to understand that the entire history of this State is rooted in racism, terror, racial genocide, theft, and False Flag Operations. Look at the King David Hotel Bombing in Jerusalem in 1947; Deir Yassin; the Lavon Affair; Israel’s deliberate attack on the USS Liberty on June 8th, 1967; the Pollard spy case and the subsequent AIPAC, Ben-Ami, and Stewart Nozette spy cases. Your readers and viewers need regular acquaintance with a resource like Grant Smith’s The Israel Lobby Archive, for the Institute of Research: Middle Eastern Policy where these topics are concerned. This is clearly a State that would have no hesitation to pull off a False Flag operation in New York on September 11, 2011, if they felt it benefited them, as Benjamin Netanyahu himself has stated it did. He said the day after 9/11 that [where Israel's interest is concerned], “It’s very good.” He also stated that “We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq. . . . these events swung American public opinion in our favor.”


I have a suggestion for those interested in the truth and international dissemination of the truth before time runs out. It may already be too late. One is to see that the independent film producer, Merlin Miller of Americana Pictures, gets the funding he needs to produce his completed movie screenplay on Israel’s premeditated attack on the USS Liberty, entitled “False Flag.” The second is that the funding be brought forth to put Michael Collins Piper’s book on the Kennedy Assassination, Final Judgment, into cinematic production. Why? If the American public ever discovers what the State of Israel has been doing at their expense, and why, the Zionist enterprise will be finished. This is why Merlin Miller recently ventured into Tehran for the New Horizon Independent Film Festival hosted by Director Mohammad Tayyeb and a host of others. Miller is a West Point graduate, former American Army Officer and Paramount Pictures producer. He is sick of what the Zionist Lobby is doing to this country, and to the rest of the world. He needs our help to level the cinematic playing field with this project. Decent people everywhere will profit if it comes to pass.

I want to make something absolutely clear. Involvement in this is not for the faint of heart. Dr. Philip Giraldi, former CIA Station Chief, head of the Council for the National Interest, and columnist for The American Conservative and Antiwar.com, has warned Mark Glenn and a few of the rest of us that we may want to join Giraldi in being abroad after the American elections. Why? Draw your own conclusions regarding what may well be soon upon all of us. The clock is ticking. It is terrifying. And Israel’s propaganda machine in the United States is kicking in to make it happen, everyone from Rupert Murdoch and Fox News to John Hagee, the rotund Zionist-mouthpiece of Cornerstone Church in San Antonio.

Q: Can we interpret the 9/11 attacks in the context of a false flag operation aimed at providing the U.S. government with a convincing pretext to wage wars in the Middle East and dominate the vast oil reserves of the region?

A: This is clearly my interpretation, both in terms of oil and natural gas resources and pipelines, as well as providing Netanyahu and his Likudniks the pretext to expand the borders of Eretz Yisrael from the Nile River to the Tigris and Euphrates. The position papers of the Project of the New American Century (PNAC) entitled, “A Clean Break: A Strategy for Securing the Realm,” and the September 2000 PNAC production of Rabbi Dov Zakheim, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and Company entitled, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses,” are prima facie evidence of this, in my opinion. It is noteworthy that in the September 2000 release, the authors advocate another “catastrophic and catalyzing event–like Pearl Harbor” to get the American public behind a perpetual war footing and military presence in the Middle East and Central Asia. Reading these PNAC releases in conjunction with Robert Stinnett’s book on FDR and Pearl Harbor entitled, “Day of Deceit,” and Pat Buchanan’s review of Herbert Hoover’s diary on FDR and Pearl Harbor, should contextualize how ominous this reference really is.

We are headed for a Third World War spearheaded by the Zionist/Talmudic Ideology of Racial Supremacy, Jewish International Banking, and Oil and Natural Gas Consortiums. It will be sold to the American public as something in their own interest and in the interest of protecting the homeland. This is absolutely absurd. Last night, when watching an NFL football game, I witnessed an outlandish United States Marine Corps recruiting ad which showed a bunch of American kids in high technology military uniforms and helmets, the latest automatic weaponry, and plenty of zeal, disembarking from amphibious vehicles and charging into the teeth of enemy fire and smoke on a shoreline The orchestrated music in the background and the video-game appearance of the ad, were topped off by the punchline of the advertised appeal to join the War Machine: Which Way Will You Run? Goebbels would have been proud. Unfortunately for the kids who may be motivated to sign up courtesy of this NFL halftime advertisement, they’ll discover an amphibious assault launched on Iran in the Persian Gulf theatre is not a video game. And the American public will discover Netanyahu’s agents in the United States have sold them an entire bill of goods once again.

Q: According to Amnesty International, of the 173 men being kept at the Guantanamo Bay prison, only three have convicted and their trial “failed to meet international fair trial standards.” What’s your viewpoint regarding this horrendous detention facility which President Obama had promised to close, the people who are being kept there under charges of terrorism and the destiny which awaits them?

A: It is clearly unacceptable. But it mirrors Obama’s commitment to the ongoing development of a domestic American police state, as I said on Press TV. An American President whose Justice Department actually argues in public has the authority to order the assassination of American citizens on suspicion of terrorist activities or involvement with a terrorist group, without charges, trial, and legal representation, has a non-existent view of the American Constitution, Bill of Rights, and habeas corpus. This parallels Obama’s continuation of the PNAC/Bush/Cheney/Wolfowitz foreign policy in the Middle East. Millions of people who voted for this guy have been betrayed. The vexing quandary is that the only alternative to him is Mitt Romney, clearly bought and paid for by the Israeli Lobby, as the Sheldon Adelson connection underscores. And Congress is also bought and paid for in terms of Netanyahu’s machine. Just take a look at the yearly list of Congressional contributions to political candidates emanating from Israel-friendly PACs as published by the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. The evil fruits of all of this are evident, and underscore Dr. Philip Giraldi’s friendly warning to anti-Zionist, pro-freedom, antiwar activists that they might enjoy living somewhere else in the near future. The nightmare of Palestine, Gaza, Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, and soon Iran, will be accompanied by the continued transformation of the United States into a country whose economy, foreign policy, government, media, and educational establishment are simply enslaved to what Greg Felton refers to as the Zionist Parasite. I no longer recognize the America of my youth. Others tell me the same thing. At least a few of us understand why this has happened, and what it likely means for the future.

Q: Do you see the 9/11 events as some kind of justification for waging a military, media and cultural war against Islam? Following the attacks, we have seen a tremendous rise of Islamophobic sentiments in the U.S. and Europe, and offensive insults to the Islamic sacraments. You remember the Jyllands-Posten cartoons ridiculing Prophet Muhammad, the burning of the Holy Quran by Pastor Terry Jones, the recent anti-Islamic movie by Sam Bacile and other attacks on the Islamic values in the West. What’s your evaluation of these events and their connection to the 9/11 attacks?

A: There is a direct connection of all of this to Israeli money and Jewish interests. The Think Progress report proves it. This is just the tip of the iceberg The plan is to desecrate the Islamic faith, as Jewish interests subverted and financed the earlier American Christian cultural demise and eclipse with pornography, abortion-on-demand, the homosexual rights movement, and movies and TV shows that trashed orthodox Christianity, the substitutionary atonement of Christ, the Virgin Mary, and the New Testament. When there are angry protests against this desecration of Islam in North Africa, the Middle East, Central Asia, and the Indian Subcontinent, the Zionists will have succeeded in demonizing Islamic people of faith as violent, irrational, dark-skinned extremists.

The subliminal message in the West is that Arabs and Iranians aren’t truly human beings made in the Image of God and that invading and occupying their countries is legitimate and honorable, while killing them and destroying their families and communities isn’t a problem for a “civilized” society that wants to help itself to their property and natural resources. This all serves the Zionist Eretz Yisrael agenda, the Oil and Natural Gas Consortiums, and the Bankers. It also serves to weaken legitimate Christianity and Islam by pitting them against each other when they should be in natural alliance, facilitating the destruction of the opposition to the New World Order Ben Gurion envisioned. We must not fall for this.
Decent people in the West and in the Islamic world must join forces against this evil Divide and Conquer strategy. This is why my radio partner, Mark Glenn, started his Crescent and Cross outreach some years ago. Glenn was one of the first to recognize how the Master Plan of the Hidden Hand was being put together. He’s been proven right through time, as the Sam Bacile film release corroborates. Eric Margolis clearly tagged this latest piece of cinematic trash “Neo-Conservative pornography” serving the interest of those promoting the War of Civilizations. That War of Civilizations is clearly synonymous with the Zionist agenda and gameplan. They are one and the same.
Q: Reacting to the 9/11 attacks, the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, “It’s very good… Well, it’s not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy [for Israel].” In what ways have the 9/11 events served the interests of the Israeli regime? Will Tel Aviv continue to benefit from the repercussions of the 9/11?

A: In the short term, it created the climate of American public support for the idiotic and destructive policies which followed September 11, 2001, including using the American military as a Janissary Force in support of the Likud/Netanyahu agenda in Palestine, the Middle East, and Central Asia, while heading for national economic bankruptcy while doing so. This policy of Likud is an extension of the earlier Irgun and Stern Gang policy shared by David Ben Gurion himself: to “restore the Kingdom of David and Solomon to its biblical borders,” the so-called Eretz Yisrael, or Greater Israel vision for not only controlling the territory from the Nile River to the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, but governing the entire planet from a Jewish-controlled Jerusalem in global control of the International Banking System and all the nations of the earth in subservience to it. These pro-Zionist zealots in John Hagee’s “Christian” cult are operating in self-delusion and self-contradiction at precisely this point. How does support of World Government and the New World Order equate with being “pro-America?” How does commitment to Jesus Christ and his Kingdom equate with support for something rooted in a doctrine of racial supremacy, violence, theft, and deception? What is the New Testament’s understanding of the composition of the eschatological evil of 2 Thessalonians 2 and Revelation 13?

Exposure of the nature and methodology of Zionism, combined with the catastrophic consequences for those who support it in the United States and Europe, will change Israel’s status as a cunning beneficiary of 9/11 to its ultimate victim. I predict that there will be a backlash against Zionism and the Israeli Lobby once the disaster they have crafted for everyone else completely materializes. It may take a Third World War and a global economic collapse to facilitate that. But it will happen. It will make Iranian backlash against the American and British policies in Iran from 1953 to 1979 look like child’s play by comparison. Those who truly planned, plotted, and implemented what happened in New York City on September 11, 2001, will rue the day they did.

Q: Do you find any connection between the 9/11 attacks and the long-run policies of the United States government in denigrating Iran and endangering its interests in the region? It was after the 9/11 attacks that George W. Bush declared his War on Terror and branded Iran as part of an Axis of Evil. He had devised plans to attack Iran, but his term ended and he couldn’t fulfill his promise of invading Iran. What’s your take on that?

A: American machinations go back to Kermit Roosevelt’s Operation Ajax in 1953. The Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979 was a response to what the United States had been doing in that country in the previous quarter of a century, among many other things. Since 1979, it is clear that Zionist and American imperial interests were interested in bringing back an Iranian regime that could be controlled by these interests. Bush was demonizing Iran as part of the Axis of Evil, clearly at the behest of the Bankers, the Oil Consortiums, and the PNAC/Zionist crowd. A future preemptive military strike on Iran would meet with the approval of the Oil Consortiums and Saudi Arabia, the Bankers who want to preserve the declining American dollar as the reserve currency of the planet, and Israel’s Likudniks. This is the alliance which is creating trumped up charges about Iran’s nuclear program and their alleged threat to the survivability of the planet. The only people threatening the planet and world peace are the people trying to get this war started. Make no mistake about it.

Q: And finally, what’s your analysis of the U.S. mainstream media’s coverage of the 9/11 attacks and its aftermaths? Which trajectory and policy line did they follow? Now, almost one decade after the attacks, how are they reacting to the different controversies surrounding the event?

A: The mainstream U.S. media, as we have already seen, sustained the myth regarding the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks and the legitimacy of American military operations in the Middle East and Central Asia thereafter. They did so as agents of Zionism, Banking, Oil, and Multinational Consortiums and Interests. This is why the employment of Alternative Media, the Internet, and Foreign Media is so essential in removing the veil regarding the role of the U.S. mainstream media in perpetrating fraud and tragedy. The falsehoods and mythologies they continue to perpetrate on Pearl Harbor, the Kennedy Assassination, the USS Liberty attack, and 9/11 must be absolutely exposed and debunked, not simply in the interest of a recovery of historical truth, but to accomplish the defenestration of Mainstream Media once and for all. This would remove them as an effective force in selling the False Flag incident soon to come which is being planned to legitimize and sell a preemptive military attack on Iran. Their absolute defenestration forever would be a prelude to a cleansing of all of the other corrupt American and global institutions corrupted by the Mark of the Beast. Their comprehensive discrediting and defeat would give the rest of us a foothold in regaining control of our respective houses. Let the effort begin.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!