Sunday, 29 November 2009

Iran and Latin America to Build a Common Future


Almanar

29/11/2009 By Yusuf Fernandez
November 27, 2009

Revolutionary Bolivian President Evo Morales said while receiving Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad in La Paz on 24 November that “the collaboration between our two countries grows day by day.” The visit cemented a close relationship between the two nations, which has been growing since 2006 when Morales was swept to power by popular vote as the first indigenous president of Bolivia.

“The two revolutionary nations and the governments of Iran and Bolivia are natural allies and will remain supportive of one another under any circumstance,” affirmed Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. “Although there is a long geographical distance between the Iranian and Bolivian nations, our hearts, aspirations and thoughts are very similar to each other.”

The two presidents signed a joint statement “recognizing the legitimate right of all countries to use and develop nuclear energy for peaceful ends, within the framework of international rights.” Morales has repeatedly rejected the intervention of the United Nations Security Council in Iran's nuclear program, saying it “lacks any legal or technical justification”.

La Paz and Tehran first established relations in September 2007. Morales confirmed his desire to further expand relations and announced that he would move Bolivia's only embassy in the Middle East from Egypt to the Iranian capital of Tehran.

Iran's economic ties to Bolivia include investments in milk processing plants, TV and radio stations and hydrocarbon and hydroelectric exploration. It has also been announced that Iran would help finance the creation of a state cement firm in Bolivia.

Morales did not hide his admiration of Iran's achievements in economic and technological areas during his last visit to Iran. “I praise officials of the country for the development Iran has achieved in various fields and cannot at the same time decline to express my surprise.”

During the recent visit of Ahmadinejad to La Paz, both leaders also signed a deal increasing Iran's involvement in mining research in Bolivia's Salar de Uyuni, a vast salt desert near the Chilean border that holds half the world's known reserves of lithium -- a key mineral used in rechargeable batteries for cell phones, laptops and electric cars.

Hearts, aspirations and thoughts

The natural friendship between the two countries has grown out of their shared stance against imperialism and their rejection of interference by foreign powers. “It is my experience that imperialism stifles development.” Morales said.
The strong anti imperialist stance by Morales was key to his landslide election victory. Within 6 months of becoming president, Morales brought energy production back under national ownership, rejecting foreign control of Bolivia's natural gas reserves, which are the second largest in South America.

Morales thinks that the call for freedom in Latin America today is overwhelming. With a strong will, Bolivia is resisting and standing up to foreign powers, and has chosen its independent status in a fully democratic way. The nation wants to remain independent, decide its own fate, to administer justice and to progress.

The Non-Aligned Movement

Both Iran and Bolivia are members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM). Both countries play very significant roles in international as well as South-South relations.

The movement consists of countries who believe in their national independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity. The purpose of the group is to "struggle against imperialism, colonialism, neo-colonialism, racism, Zionism, and all forms of foreign aggression, occupation, domination, interference or hegemony as well as against great power and bloc politics."

Iran joined the movement in 1979 following the Islamic Revolution. Iranian leaders believed that the objectives of NAM were aligned with their foreign policy goals, which is a sentiment shared by the many Latin American members of NAM.

Wider Latin America

After centuries of foreign rule and interference, many Latin American countries have awakened to true geopolitical independence. In recent years, global dynamics and internal political changes have reshaped the political configuration of Central and South America. Under the new framework, Latin American governments are distancing themselves from Washington. Many are facing Western criticism as a result, but Iran is keen to establish strong partnerships with such nations.

Iran has established strong relations with Latin American countries, including Venezuela, Cuba, Ecuador and Nicaragua.

Venezuela

Since coming to power in 1998, President Hugo Chavez has increased cooperation with Tehran. He has made five official visits to Iran and has publicly stated that he considers the country a model for development. Iran has cemented its relations with Caracas through investment, with bilateral trade currently standing at approximately $2.5 billion. In March 2007, Iranian vehicles were introduced to the Venezuelan market through joint venture Venirauto; energy companies in the two countries have formed a joint venture company, Venezirian Oil.

Venezuela and Iran have agreed to act jointly in the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). They are also working together to persuade other oil-producing countries to reduce oil production in order to raise prices and thus promote their economic development. Chavez has welcomed Iran's observer membership of the Cuban-Venezuelan alternative to the US-promoted Free Trade Area of the Americas, which further illustrates the growing relationship between Caracas and Tehran.

In the recent visit to Caracas, Ahmadinejad was accompanied by 70 heads of Iranian companies, who signed twelve cooperation agreements in housing, agriculture, fisheries, transportation, energy, environment, tourism and education.

During the visit, Chavez claimed that Ahmadinejad was a "symbol of resistance” who raises Latin American nations' spirit in their fight against imperialism. “I can say that you are a hero and a symbol of resistance in the fight against imperialism.”

Cuba

Cuba is one of Iran's most natural allies in the region. US sanctions have been imposed on both countries as a penalty for their pursuit of independent policies. Cuba has repeatedly defended Iran's right to access nuclear energy. In a February 2006 vote at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Cuba, along with Venezuela and Syria, voted against an unfair resolution, promoted by imperialist and Zionist international circles, to impose sanctions on Iran. Havana and Tehran are now exploring cooperation in the textile, agriculture, and petrochemical industries.

Nicaragua

In 1979, the Sandinist revolution in Nicaragua destroyed the incumbent pro-US regime and became a light of hope for Latin America. The revolutions of Nicaragua and Iran soon initiated friendly relations and Nicaraguans found inspiration in the Iranian revolution.

The victory of Daniel Ortega in the 2006 presidential elections has deepened Iran-Nicaragua relations. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was a guest of honor at Ortega's inauguration ceremony in January 2007, where the Iranian president was awarded two state medals. The two leaders signed agreements for bilateral cooperation in 25 sectors including energy, trade, the economy, infrastructure, student exchange, and joint business ventures.

Brazil - Mexico - Ecuador

In 2004, Brazil and Iran took their first step toward economic and political cooperation by signing a memorandum of understanding for increased communication and commercial exchange.

In his recent visit of November, Ahmadinejad voiced support for Brazil's bid to one day become a permanent member of the UN Security Council. Brazil is to take one of the non-permanent seats -those without the power of veto- in 2010 and 2011. "We support a reformed UN Security Council and for Brazil to have a permanent seat," he said. He argued the council "has failed over the past 60 years because of the veto power of a small number of countries, a source of insecurity for several countries in the world."


For his part, Lula has repeatedly backed Tehran's nuclear program, and said he opposed international sanctions on Iran.

In February 2005, Iran and Mexico signed a memorandum of understanding to promote collaboration in oil, gas and petrochemical sectors. Iranian authorities have already met with officials from Mexico's state oil company, Pemex. Iranian-Ecuadorian cultural and commercial cooperation has also increased in recent years and Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa has stated that he wants closer ties with Tehran.

No country in the Muslim world enjoys the same close relationships with Latin America. This highlights the strategic and long-term vision of the Iranian government, which recognizes that Latin America will play an increasingly important role in world affairs. The bonds that have been established are one of the main achievements of President Ahmadinejad's foreign policy.

Modern history

During the Cold War era, Latin America (with the exception of Cuba) was considered to be under America's 'sphere of influence'. Latin American people suffered from US imperialistic policies for more than two centuries.

During Iran's Islamic Revolution, Latin America witnessed the collapse of the Shah's regime that had given away the wealth of the country to the US and Britain. Latin America saw the unstoppable Iranian people, who took over the streets following the call of Imam Khomeini. Latin America realized that they should pay attention to a country capable of overthrowing such a regime, and one that could end US domination.

The recent popular revolutions that have taken place across Latin America, and which have brought to power true national leaders such as Evo Morales and Hugo Chavez illustrate that Iran and Latin America have much in common.

The West is threatened by the relationships that are emerging between Latin America and Iran, and has condemned them. Thomas Shannon, the senior US official for Latin America, said recently that Iran was making allies in the region to counter Washington's traditional influence and could use such relations to threaten US security. He urged Latin American governments to comply with US sanctions against Iran and called them to be "vigilant".

However, Latin American countries want to cooperate with Iran because it is an independent state. They know that if they sign a contract with Iran, they will not be betrayed due to pressures or threats from foreign powers.

“Nothing and no country can harm our relations with the revolutionary country of Iran,” Morales told reporters after meeting President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad during his recent visit.

Immanuel Wallerstein, professor emeritus at Yale and director of the Fernand Braudel Center in New Y9ork, argues that the Bush administration's endless wars exposed the limits of American power. US hegemony is coming to an irreversible end, revealing, Wallerstein says, "multiple poles of geopolitical power". He predicts that we are entering “a situation of structural crisis towards the construction of a new world system (with no hegemonic power)”.

In this new system, Iran and Latin America can play a decisive role in international politics. They own important energy resources, educated populations and the determination to remain independent. In this sense, cooperation between Latin America and Iran can bring to an end the era of US imperialistic policies and usher in a multi-polar world.

Al-Manar.com.lb is not responsible for the content of this article or for any external internet sites. The views expressed are the author's alone.

LF Bloc Seeks to Remove Resistance from Policy Statement!


Almanar

29/11/2009 Lebanese were still "celebrating" the "gift" presented by their government on the eve of Al-Adha, in reference to the government's ministerial statement, when the Lebanese Forces decided once again to "disturb" everyone…

Thus, after his so-called "allies" before his "rivals" confirmed the country's fundamental right of "Resistance" until the liberation of all Lebanese territory occupied by the Israeli enemy, LF chief Samir Geagea wasn't satisfied.

The reason is so simple. In his dictionary, there's nothing called "Resistance"!

Thus, Geagea didn't hesitate to gather his bloc, including his two "independent" ministers, and announce the Lebanese Forces "opposition" to the concept of "Resistance," of course without telling the Lebanese what was his "smart plan" to face the Israeli occupation and continuous threats against his country.

Following the "exceptional" meeting at Geagea's residence, the Lebanese Forces parliamentary bloc claimed that "the mentioning of the resistance in the sixth article of the ministerial Policy Statement contradicts with the statement itself in the first place, and with the Constitution and Taef Accord, as well as with Resolution 1701 and other international resolutions."

Therefore, the bloc asked the government to "amend that article or terminate it in preservation of its credibility, solemnity, and constitutionality."

"It contradicts the charter of coexistence in addition to being unconstitutional and illegal, therefore it is invalid," the bloc went on to claim.

The bloc pretended that the Taef Accord did not include any hint about the resistance, but rather "it urged respecting international resolutions, extending authority of the State on all territories, and disarming Lebanese and non-Lebanese militias without exceptions."

"The mentioning of the word 'Resistance' in the sixth article is a bypassing of the national dialogue table and predetermination of its resolutions," it concluded.

One message can be understood from the LF new "show": it's launching a "trivial opposition within the government," a concept that the Lebanese Forces itself rejected and condemned before finding itself alone in the "middle of the storm"!

Saudi Faces Strong Resistance in Yemen Front


Link


Houthi fighters say they are putting up a strong resistance against the Saudi Arabian army in northern Yemen and claim to have delivered heavy blows to the Kingdom's army.

The Saudi military's push towards Mount Mamdouh has reportedly failed, the Houthis said on Friday, adding that the clashes have destroyed a Saudi tank, dismantled a regiment, and killed several Saudi soldiers.

On Wednesday, the Houthis destroyed two Saudi tanks as they attempted to cross the border into northern Yemen.

The fighters have also released footage showing a large cache of heavy-machine guns, rockets and bullets they seized from Saudi forces.

Riyadh has been assisting the Sana'a government in the massive offensive launched against the Houthi fighters in August after alleging that the Shia fighters opened fire on a number of its border guards.

The Houthis, who took arms in 2004 to fight the central government's discrimination against Yemen's Shia minority, accuse Riyadh and Sana'a of funding al-Qaeda and Wahhabi extremists to help quell the Shia resistance.

They also accuse Saudi Arabia of pounding Yemeni villages and using deadly phosphorous bombs as well as indiscriminate targeting of civilians in there.

The UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) estimates that since 2004 up to 175,000 people have been forced to leave their homes in Saada Province and take refuge in overcrowded UN camps.

Source here.

Posted by Faisal Tehrani at 11:57 PM


Dubai Faces First Financial Legal System Test after Debt Shock


Dubai Faces First Financial Legal System Test after Debt Shock

29/11/2009 Dubai's ambitions to become an international financial centre are in doubt after the shock announcement that its main state-owned firm wants to suspend debt payments, analysts said on Sunday, AFP’s Andrew Newby says.
"What happens next and, more pertinently, how critical decisions are disclosed will cement its continuing credibility and its place as a financial centre," said Cubillas Ding, senior analyst at Celent research and consultancy group.
"Dubai's untested financial legal system is now facing its first real test in relation to how it deals with the international community. No one wants to play in a playground where the rules are unclear," he said.

Dubai International Financial Centre, a 110-acre (44.5 hectare) free trade zone which opened in 2004, prides itself on its website as "the world's fastest growing international financial centre."
And "it aims to develop the same stature as New York, London and Hong Kong."
Among businesses based there are the local stock exchange Dubai Financial Market and international sister market Nasdaq Dubai.
Borse Dubai, majority shareholder in both operations, also holds 22 percent in the London Stock Exchange and 19.9 percent in Nasdaq OMX, owner of New York's mighty Nasdaq exchange and several stock markets in European countries.

"As the world economy goes through fundamental change and realignment, DIFC is poised to emerge as a major global player in the coming years," David Eldon, chairman of the DIFC authority, said at celebrations this month to mark the fifth anniversary of the centre's launch.
The DIFC said at that time, without giving details, that the business cluster in its financial district had registered an annual growth rate of 127 percent.

But the performance of the DFM Index, the main indicator for the emirate's stock market, tells a different story.

It peaked above 6,000 points two years ago then began to fall, tumbling sharply during the global credit crunch late last year and dropping below 1,500 points.
It closed its latest trading day on Wednesday at 2,070.89, up more than 40 percent from the start of the year but still down by two-thirds from its all-time high.

Dubai authorities chose the evening before the start of a four-day holiday for the Muslim festival of Eid al-Adha to make the shock announcement that its massive Dubai World holding company wants to suspend debt payments for six months pending a restructuring of the conglomerate.
The loss of confidence in Dubai by international investors was compounded by the difficulty of obtain information about what Dubai plans to do to resolve the debt crisis.
"The predictability of decision-making processes and the lead up to decisions is a major concern," Celent's Ding said. "Transparency is important. With the manner the sequence of events has been managed, this has not been forthcoming."

The contract most directly affected by the moratorium is the redemption due in December of a 3.5-billion-dollar (2.9-billion-euro) Islamic bond issued by Dubai World construction business Nakheel, the company behind Dubai's iconic Palm Jumeirah tree-shaped artificial island.
Dubai has an estimated debt mountain of 80 billion dollars, as large as the emirate's entire gross domestic product. Dubai World's group debt of 59 billion dollars comprises three-quarters of the total.

Sheikh Ahmed bin Saeed al-Maktoum, head of Dubai's Supreme Fiscal Committee, issued a statement on Thursday seeking to reassure investors.
"The government is spearheading the restructuring of this commercial operation in the full knowledge of how the markets would react. We understand the concerns of the market and the creditors in particular," he said.
"Further information will be made available early next week."

But the lack of detail merely served to alarm investors further.
"Everyone will speculate about whether the request to re-schedule debt will succeed or lead to default, what other Dubai-based entities could suffer a similar fate, whether it could prove more widely contagious and which banks globally are most exposed," Kit Juckes, at London-based currency trading group ECU, said

Oliver Bell of Swiss bank Pictet thinks the Dubai World crisis is a "disaster" for Middle East and North Africa equity markets that will trigger a big sell-off, he told the UK's Citywire financial news website.
When news of Dubai World's problems first broke, he "hoped it was a miscommunication," but Sheikh Ahmed's statement confirmed Bell's worst fears.
"This was more alarming as it suggests it has been carefully planned and they knew markets would be very concerned. Now we are in a vacuum of no news again," he said.
"If all news stays as it is, the UAE market will sell off very sharply when it reopens (on Monday) after the Eid" holidays, Citywire quoted him as saying.

Analysts believe that Dubai looks for oil-rich Abu Dhabi as the emirate that will help Dubai out of its crisis. The President of the United Arab Emirates Sheikh Mohammed Bin Rashed Al-Maktoum held a meeting with Abu Dhabi’s governor Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed on Saturday n the sidelines of Adha Eid festivities. News reports said the meeting tackled Dubai’s dept crisis.
The international economic crisis has had a bad impact on Dubai which led it, at the beginning of 2009, to borrow 10 billion dollars by issuing bonds from the Central Bank of the UAE.

IOF soldiers arrest fifth son of Um Bakir


PIC

[ 28/11/2009 - 10:13 AM ]

NABLUS, (PIC)-- The Israeli occupation forces (IOF) spoilt the Eid joy for the Palestinian old widow Um Bakir in Nablus on Friday and took away her fifth son to join his four brothers in detention.

Local sources reported that large numbers of IOF soldiers broke into the home of late Sheikh Said Bilal and savagely searched it before taking away the only remaining son of the family into custody.

Um Bakir told the Ahrar human rights center that Israel wants to pressure the families of prisoners after it failed to pressure the resistance into concluding the prisoners' exchange deal according to its own terms.

Fuad Al-Khafsh, the center's director, denounced the detention of Omar Bilal, who is the only son for that family out of prison.

He explained that the eldest son Bakir has been held under administrative custody for two years while the other son Muaz, who has been in prison for 11 years, is serving 26 life sentences, Othman, who has served 15 years in jail, is sentenced to life, while Obada was sentenced to ten years and his wife was taken into custody in mid November this year.

Now they have taken the fifth and remaining son of the family Omar, Khafsh pointed out.

He called on the local and international media outlets to shed light on the suffering of this Palestinian family and to expose the criminal image of the Israeli occupation authority.

KARKAR: Israeli war criminal welcomed in Australian


{Goldstone} by Naser Al Ja'fari-Al Arabs today newspaper-Jordan

Link

- November 29, 2009

Olmert in Parl4
PHOTO:
AAP Image/Alan Porritt, Canberra, 26 November 2009


by Sonja Karkar - Australians for Palestine - 29 November 2009

The news that former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert was in Australia and was welcomed by the honourable members of our parliament came as somewhat of a shock. It is one thing to have allowed a man on corruption charges as well as facing war crimes indictments into Australia at all; it is another thing that he was listed as a distinguished guest in Hansard – the official record of parliamentary proceedings – and received a resounding “hear, hear” from our elected representatives.

This is, after all, the man who approved the genocidal attack on the 1.5 million imprisoned and defenceless Palestinians in Gaza less than a year ago. This is the same attack that was the subject of numerous enquiries, not least the UN fact-finding mission led by Justice Richard Goldstone, which found that “the operations were carefully planned . . . and designed to punish, humiliate and terrorise a civilian population . . . [and] that the serious violations of International Humanitarian Law recounted in this report fall within the subject-matter jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC).” With further investigations, these violations may well amount to “war crimes and “crimes against humanity”. Read More…

ACTION AGAINST ISRAELI WAR CRIMINALS
November 29, 2009

EDITOR’S COMMENT: Former Israeli Prime Minister and war criminal Ehud Olmert arrived in Australia unnoticed until his presence was noted in the House on Thursday, the last sitting day of parliament for the year. Columnist and propagandist for Israel, Greg Sheridan wrote about him two days later in The Australian and gloated about his long interview with this “giant of contemporary Middle East politics”. That interview resulted in two articles (see first; see second) in the same newspaper on the same day by the same author. I suppose a “giant” needs that much verbiage. Indeed, Sheridan seems to have a penchant for giants: Ariel Sharon was mighty amongst other giants of Israel’s past and even our own John Howard grew into one.

Aside from the casual mention of corruption charges against Olmert, there is nothing to suggest that Olmert is anything but a man of peace whose extensive “generous” offer to the Palestinians seems to have replaced the myth of Barak’s long-touted most generous offer foolishly rejected by the Palestinians. Jonathan Cook exposes that myth here.


Olmert’s war on Gaza is fleetingly described as brutal, but Olmert regrets the innocent Palestinians killed and rejects the Goldstone report accusing Israel of war crimes as “a moral indignity”. Sheridan maintains, however, that he is “best remembered for the extensive negotiations and final peace offer that he undertook with Abbas.” If Barak’s offer did not include the lands Israel has expropriated for settlements and security zones, especially in the Jerusalem area nor that area where Israel has created Canada Park on razed villages, then what area did Omert consider to be 94% of the West Bank when he offered it and all of Gaza including a tunnel “under Palestinian control” linking the West Bank to the Gaza Strip? In the 8 years since Barak’s offer, Israel has furiously increased its settlement building and there is no sign of it stopping despite talk of freezes and partial freezes.

All this talk of peace from a man of war is just more of the same bluff and spin that the media insults us with when it needs to bolster Israel’s image. The indicted war criminal Ariel Sharon was also described as a man of peace before his brain collapsed. Israel churns out these peacemakers made-to-order and the world it seems cannot get enough of these split personalities. But truth, justice and the law is catching up with them.

According to J-wire – Jewish Online News from Australia and New Zealand, Olmert is in Australia attending the Australia-Israel Leadership Forum in Melbourne this coming week. We have no other details. Also arriving in Australia next week is the Israeli Vice Prime Minister Silvan Shalom who will be attending a gala dinner in Melbourne on 6 December hosted by the Australia Israel Cultural Exchange (AICA). Australia’s prime minister Kevin Rudd will be there as well. For more information about Silvan Shalom and the protest being organised see here.


Don’t let Australia become a safe haven for war criminals. We ask you to write to your local member, the ministers listed below and the media protesting visits and immunity given to suspected war criminals and demand that Australia honours its obligations under international human rights conventions by detaining anyone deemed to be war criminals until court proceedings under universal jurisdiction can be brought against them.

PLEASE PROTEST BY WRITING TO THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE AND MEDIA OUTLETS


The Hon Kevin Rudd MP, Prime Minister of Australia
Fax: (07) 3899 5755 Email

The Hon Stephen Smith MP, Minister for Foreign Affairs
Fax: 08 9272 3477
Email

The Hon Robert McLelland MP, Attorney-General

Fax: (02) 9585 9200
Email

Media outlets:
THE AGE
THE AUSTRALIAN
SYDNEY MORNING HERALD
THE CANBERRA TIMES

A Night Unto The Nations

Link

Posted by realistic bird under Politics Tags: , , , , , ,


by Ali Khalil


by Gilad Atzmon, November 27, 2009

In his latest Haarertz commentary, the Israeli political analyst Yoel Marcus wonders “How Israel became a night unto the nations?” Marcus is obviously nostalgic about the days where the great powers “were not only sympathetic to Israel’s establishment, but admired its valor in repulsing the Arab states’ onslaught.”

Proudly he mentions the ‘renowned foreign journalists’ who came to Israel in 1948 and wrote “glowing reports about this war of David against Goliath”. Noticeably, Marcus fails to mention or to grasp that the expulsion of the indigenous Palestinians from their villages and cities wasn’t exactly a repetition of a ‘David against Goliath’ narrative. Quite the opposite, it was a story of a young organised Jewish army that ethnically cleansed defenseless civilian population consisting mainly of peasants.

As it happens, just three years after the liberation of Auschwitz the newly formed Jewish state ethnically cleansed the vast majority of Palestine’s indigenous population. Young IDF soldiers were following a racist doctrine that was categorically no different from the Nazi agenda. It was all about the establishment of a ‘Jew only’ state. For some peculiar reason Yoel Marcus is convinced that back then Israel was a light unto the nations. Miraculously, the Israelis are pretty efficient in forgetting their original sin. Like their Diaspora ancestors they adopted a banal vision of their historical narrative. This narrative repeats itself in many Jewish and Israeli holidays(1) and is usually described humorously as:

‘They wanted to kill us, we survived, let’s eat’.

But times have changed according to Marcus “admiration for Israel’s strength gradually turned into resentment”. Marcus grasps that “Israel’s military might and its unrestrained use of this might have turned the David-versus-Goliath analogy into an asset for the Palestinians.” Interestingly enough, Marcus fails to understand that for some time now, the public perception has reversed the roles. In the eyes of Palestinians, Israel has never been an innocent little kosher ‘David’. In fact it has always been a crude monstrous genocidal entity. True, Zionists managed to fool the nations for many years presenting Israel as an harmless lost child who ‘returned’ home after 2000 years. The facts are now disclosed. The Jewish nation is an invention. The return saga is based on a fantasy. The only facts surrounding the Jewish state are the barbarian and merciless tactics it performs day by day.

Marcus notes that the reputation of Israel shifted radically. It is now regarded as aggressive and domineering. Unlike Alan Dershowitz who myopically insists that Israeli support in American campuses is guaranteed, Marcus is honest and brave enough to admit that American universities are becoming pro-Palestinian and anti-Israeli. “That is dangerous” he says “because this is where America’s future leaders are bred.”

Marcus, however, is obviously extremely naive. Like most Israeli leftists he believes that Israel’s trouble started in 1967 with the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza. Marcus, like most Israelis, is convinced that once occupation ends the Jewish State would once again surf the waves of glowing admiration. Marcus fails to understand that Israel has past the no-return-zone. In spite of the fact that he has written for Haaretz for decades and must be familiar with the most intimate details of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Marcus, like most Israelis, manages to miss what the Palestinian cause is all about. He somehow dismisses the 1948 Nakba and the refugee issue.

Shockingly enough, in the eyes of the Zio-centric journalist, Palestinians and Goyim in general are an easy target for manipulation. It is this exact tendency that led to the birth of Israel’s ‘unilateral’ philosophy. We the Jews will do what we have to do, the world will follow. In Ben Gurion’s words: “it doesn’t matter what the Goyim say, all that matters is what Jews do.”

Marcus is concerned. Israel’s reputation is falling apart “From a light unto the nations, Israel has become a maligned and ostracized nation”…. “Ever since Operation Cast Lead in Gaza officers in the Israel Defense Forces have been at risk every time they land in an international airport”. However, Marcus is not at all concerned with the fact that he himself is living on stolen land. Morality seems to be beyond him. There is not a single reference to ethics in his entire article. For Marcus and other Israeli leftists, it is all about the exchange rate. It is all about give and take rather than self reflection that may lead into a long overdue ethical realisation.

Marcus wants Israel to be a light unto the nations. He doesn’t understand that this is not going to happen. The window of opportunity is closing down. The disclosure of Israeli barbarism together with the exposure of its relentless lobbies around the world makes it very clear. Israel is not just night unto the nations. It is actually a total nightmare and embarrassment to humanity and humanism.

(1) Hanukah, Passover, Israeli Independence day etc

Afghan children die of ‘neglect’: video

Link

Posted by realistic bird under Politics, Videos Tags: , , , , , , ,



by Al Jazeera

Afghan refugees who fled the war-torn south have claimed they are so neglected by the government in Kabul that their children are dying from hypothermia for want of the most basic supplies.

Families that left Helmand, Kandahar and other provinces to escape the fighting between US-led forces and a resurgent Taliban say the cold is much more lethal.

Living in a make-shift camp on the edge of Kabul, residents told Al Jazeera’s James Bays that no government official has ever come to see how they have been forced to live.

The claim comes as UN officials say Afghan children are suffering disastrous levels of abuse and deprivation.

At a news conference marking the 20th anniversary of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child this week, officials said childrens rights were being neglected despite vast flows of Western aid into the country.

Afghanistan has the highest infant mortality rate in the world, said Catherine Mbengue, country representative for the UN childrens fund UNICEF.

Seventy percent of the population has no access to safe drinking water. Thirty percent of children are involved in child labour. Forty-three percent of girls are married under-age, she said.

More than one in four children born in Afghanistan die before the age of five, according to UNICEF estimates.

EXCLUSIVE: Michel Aoun at the Elysee ... not as usual.

Link


FLC has learned from "source Impeccable" that "Les Coulisses de L'Elysee" are putting the final touches on the logistics of Gen. Aoun's upcoming trip to the French capital. "The pomp", says an official with first hand knowledge of the preparatifs, "will reflect the General's prominence as a Lebanese leader" and most pronouncedly as THE leader in the Christian community.

That surely explains the rabid reactions of the likes of Samir Geagea' & most recently Amine Gemayel, to Aoun's 'movements' across the board. The meeting of Aoun with Druze leader Walid Jumblatt, and the consequences of such a detente on the future of politics in the Mountains of the Chouf & Aleyh, are certainly becoming more than a nuisance to the Gemayels & Geagea', without forgetting the their patrons on either side of the Mediterra-tlantic!

Posted by G, Z, or B at 10:44 PM

Chavez: ‘Genocidal’ “Israel” Aims to ‘Exterminate’ Palestinians

Link


Abbas has no shame he stood beside Chavez who said to the supposed leader of the Palestinians (not!) that the Israelis are exterminating your people and the man repeats the same old song of we want negotiations. This is not diplomacy, this is a complete lobotomy!

Al Manar

28/11/2009 In a meeting with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas on Friday night, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez accused Israel of aiming to “exterminate” the Palestinians.

Standing beside Abbas at the presidential palace, Chavez saluted the Palestinians for what he called their “fight against the Yankee Empire … against the genocidal state of Israel, which attacks, which kills, which attempts to exterminate the Palestinian people.”

Abbas thanked the Chavez government for its support and said: “We’re all on the same path.”

Chavez made similar remarks on Wednesday, denouncing Israel as “a murderous arm of the Yankee Empire” during a visit by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Earlier Friday, the PA president dismissed Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s plan to temporarily halt new construction of West Bank settlements as insufficient, saying Palestinians do not accept Israel’s tack in trying to restart peace negotiations.

During his first visit to Venezuela, the PA president said, “We can’t accept the current Israeli government’s concept for the negotiations.”

“We don’t have any condition to restarting negotiations except the commitment of the two sides to the foundations of the peace operation according to the road map, and especially stopping the expansionist activities of the Israelis,” Abbas told lawmakers, speaking through an interpreter.

He said Wednesday’s announcement by Netanyahu of a 10-month halt to new construction in West Bank Israeli settlements “didn’t bring anything new because the occupation is going to continue in the West Bank and in Jerusalem.”

“The Israeli prime minister had to choose between peace and occupation.” Abbas said. “Lamentably, he chose occupation.”

Abbas earlier visited Brazil, Argentina, Chile and Paraguay to build support for efforts toward a Palestinian state.

Latin American leaders backed his calls for Israel to halt settlement construction and also to guarantee that future borders are based on 1967 lines. Netanyahu says such matters must be resolved in negotiations.

Chavez broke diplomatic ties with Israel in January to protest its military offensive in the Gaza Strip that killed over 1400 Palestinians, including 420 children and injured more than 5300 others. In April, Palestinian officials opened a diplomatic mission in Venezuela, saying it would be a diplomatic hub in South America.

Abbas told Venezuela’s National Assembly that the long history of Mideast negotiations has shown in the past that Israel “doesn’t want peace.” He compared the barrier of walls and fences separating Israel from Palestinian areas to the Berlin Wall. “The Palestinian people, like the rest of the peoples of the world, want to live free, peacefully, independent,” Abbas said. “When is the world going to hear us?”

Chavez has repeatedly condemned Israel as a “genocidal” government, though he has also assured Jews living in Venezuela he wants to maintain good relations with them.

A leading Jewish community group, that Venezuelan Confederation of Israelite Associations, criticized the government’s warm reception of Ahmadinejad this week.

An international Jewish rights group, the Los Angeles-based Simon Wiesenthal Center, demanded on Thursday that the Organization of American States investigate what it called Venezuela’s role in promoting terrorism, condemning Chavez’s praise of Carlos the Jackal – the imprisoned Venezuelan notorious for a series of Cold War-era bombings, assassinations and hostage dramas.

Chavez lauded Carlos – whose real name is Ilich Ramirez Sanchez – last week as a “revolutionary fighter” who aided the cause of the Palestinians.

Ramirez is serving a life sentence in a French prison for the 1975 murders of two French secret agents and an alleged informant. He also has been linked to the 1976 hijacking of an Air France jet en route to Uganda, as well as bombings in France.

Shimon Samuels, the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s director of international relations, called Chavez’s remarks “an abominable message” condoning violence. “He prefers to put himself on the side of the murderers,” Samuels said.


GOT APARTHEID?

Link



From the Palestine Note:

Unlike the Palestinians in West Bank and Gaza, the situation of the non-Jewish minority in Israel is not receiving enough of the world's attention, so in a sense it's even more important to follow it closely.

About a week ago, Sikkuy, The Association for the Advancement of Civic Equality in Israel, published its annual report. The report is an Index measuring the socioeconomic gap between Arab and Jews in Israel

In short, the situation is not good - and it's getting worse. Out of the five elements the 2008 Sikkuy report checks, in four - housing, health services, welfare services and employment - the gap between Arab and Jews has widened. In education there has been a slight improvement, but it was more due to a decline in the Jews' achievements.

The socioeconomic gap is not the result of a lack of effort on behalf of the Arab population, like some people like to think, but of government policy, dating back decades

More Arabs go to university than ever - but they can't find jobs, neither in the private sector nor in state agencies (the number of Arabs employed by the state is much lower than their proportion in the population). Arab unemployment is much higher than the Jewish rate, especially unemployment among university graduates. And these figures are just the tip of the iceberg.

The 2008 Sikkuy index will soon be uploaded to the association's English site. The reports from 2006 and 2007 can be found there as well. It should be noted that preliminary data from 2009 is even worse. It shows, among other disturbing figures, an unusually sharp drop in the number of Arabs entitled for a high school diploma. LINK

Posted by Irish4Palestine at 3:26 PM



Iranian Lawmaker: We May Bar Inspectors, Withdraw from NPT


Link

28/11/2009 Iran's parliament may consider withdrawing from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), an Iranian lawmaker was quoted by the country's official IRNA news agency as saying Saturday.

The threat comes a day after a resolution passed by the board of the UN nuclear agency demanded that Tehran immediately stop building its newly revealed nuclear facility and freeze uranium enrichment.

Mohammad Karamirad said Saturday that parliament may also consider blocking inspection of Iran's nuclear facilities by the International Atomic Energy Agency, which it has been allowing routinely so far. Karamirad does not speak for the government.

Earlier on Saturday, a senior Iranian cleric said Iran will produce its own fuel for a medical research reactor in Tehran if it is not made available by the UN atomic watchdog.

Ahmad Khatami, speaking at a Tehran University prayer service to mark the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha, also warned world powers that Iran would not be swayed by "bribery" or cowed by threats from its rights to nuclear technology.

Uranium enrichment is the process used to make fuel for nuclear power plants, but when extended it can also produce fissile material for an atomic bomb.

Western powers have long suspected that Iran, despite its fierce denials, is trying to build a nuclear bomb.

Tehran insists it is its right under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) while Israel, which is believed to be the sole nuclear power in the Middle East with more than 200 nuclear heads, is not a signatory for this treaty.

Cleric Khatami deemed the resolution to be "completely political and not technical in nature," but did not discuss the substance of it.

Addressing the IAEA, he said "it is your obligation, under the law, to provide fuel for the Tehran reactor. "If you did this, the issue would be closed. If you do not cooperate you should know that the nation ... which achieved its rights to technology will also provide fuel for its reactor. It is legal and in accordance with international safeguards."

The IAEA had brokered a deal under which Russia would lead a consortium that would enrich uranium for the Tehran reactor.

Iran, however, has rejected the deal, which would have involved it shipping low-enriched uranium abroad and receiving a more highly enriched version in exchange.

The IAEA has also rebuffed a counterproposal under which the exchange would take place on Iranian soil.

Khatami, who did not specifically address the specifics of the IAEA resolution, said "Islamic Iran has shown to the world over the past 30 years that it will not back down even an inch, whether in regard to its absolute rights or in the face of threats or bribery. He added, without elaborating: "Of course, Iran will have the option to confront you."

Hours after the resolution was adopted, the spokesman for Iran's foreign ministry, Ramin Mehmanparast, called it "theatrical and useless." "We do not deem it necessary to fully carry out (our) commitments to the agency if Iran's basic rights as a member of the (nuclear) Non-Proliferation Treaty are not met," he said, without elaborating.

(P P P) PALESTINIAN PERPETUAL PREDICAMENT

Link

November 28, 2009 at 9:09 am (Associate Post, Corrupt Politics, Fatah, Hamas, Palestine)


Perpetual predicament

Delayed elections will not resolve the deep national crisis facing the Palestinians, Khalid Amayreh reports from Ramallah



Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas is expected to formally announce the postponement of Palestinian general elections until further notice.

One PA official close to Abbas was quoted this week as saying that Abbas had no choice but to delay the polls. “The president has reached the conclusion that it is impossible to hold elections without the Gaza Strip. We are also not sure if Israel would allow the people of Jerusalem to participate in the elections.”

A few weeks ago, Abbas issued a decree calling for “presidential and legislative elections” to be held in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza Strip on 24 January 2010. However, a standoff in reconciliation efforts between Fatah and Hamas, and especially a seemingly hopeless peace process with Israel, eventually prompted the PA leader to announce that he wouldn’t take part in the upcoming elections. In a series of recent interviews with Arab and foreign media, Abbas emphasised that his decision was no bluff and that he was likely to end his political career. “Perhaps they [the elections] will be delayed by a year, or less, I don’t know. What I am saying now is that I will not be a candidate,” the PA leader said during an interview with the BBC Arabic Service.

Abbas said the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) leadership would take unspecified “measures” to avoid a constitutional vacuum when his term of office expires on 25 January 2010. The PLO leadership, including Fatah, has been trying in vain to convince Abbas to reconsider his decision. Fatah leaders said they wouldn’t choose a successor to Abbas, which would further exacerbate a political and constitutional crisis facing both the PA and the PLO, endangering the continued survival of the former.

Attempting to deal with the mounting crisis, the PLO Central Committee is expected to hold an important meeting in the middle of December. According to Fatah officials, the committee, which occupies an intermediate status between the Palestinian National Council (PNC) and the PLO Executive Committee, will try hard to change Abbas’s mind vis-à-vis his intention to resign. However, in case Abbas insisted on leaving, which is widely expected, the Central Committee would take “far-reaching decisions” including dissolving the Hamas-controlled — but effectively paralysed — Palestinian Legislative Council (PLC) as well as empowering the PLO to assume many of the key functions and powers of the PA — the Western-backed government of Salam Fayyad.

The dissolution of the PLC, which is a de facto Palestinian parliament, could be fraught with complications. The council, an elected body, is an integral part of the self rule authority, and dissolving it without dissolving the entire PA structure would be interpreted by Hamas as a hostile act by Fatah aimed first and foremost at the Islamic group. “An unelected body can’t dissolve an elected body,” Ahmed Bahr, deputy speaker of the PLC said. The same remark has been made repeatedly by Aziz Duweik, PLC speaker.

It is not clear as yet what retaliatory measures Hamas would take against Fatah and the PLO in case the Central Committee decided to dissolve the PLC. What is clear is that the ensuing crisis, if such a decision was made, would seriously worsen the existing crisis.

Azzam Al-Ahmed, a senior Fatah leader, expressed the fear that Abbas’s departure from public life would “plunge the Palestinian leadership and people into a real crisis”. “If the president doesn’t backtrack [on his decision not to run in the next elections], this would lead to the total collapse of the Palestinian Authority and not only its dismantlement,” Ahmed told the Jerusalem-based Arabic newspaper, Al-Quds.

In recent weeks, conflicting indications have come from Hamas as to the future of the Egyptian-mediated national reconciliation efforts. The Gaza-based leaders of the Islamic movement have been affirming Hamas’s desire to reach an agreement with Fatah as soon as possible. Some spokespersons even predicted that Hamas would sign the Egyptian- formulated document after the Eid Al-Adha holiday. However, some of Hamas’s leaders based outside occupied Palestine have indicated that reconciliation with Fatah is still a long way off. They argued that the current atmosphere in the occupied Palestinian territories, especially in the West Bank, was by no means conducive to holding elections.

In a related development, the Egyptian government has invited “the National Reconciliation Committee”, which is made up of non-partisan Palestinian intellectuals and community leaders, to Cairo to discuss Hamas’s reservations and observations about the draft reconciliation document. A committee member, Iyad Al-Sarraj, a neuro-psychiatrist from Gaza, spoke optimistically about the prospects of Hamas signing the document in the near future. The head of the committee, Yasser Wadiya, pointed out that reconciliation efforts would be resumed after Eid Al-Adha. He was quoted by Maan News Agency as saying that delegates, in coordination with Egypt, would provide guarantees and adopt confidence-building assurances to reach a final agreement.

Meanwhile, the propaganda war between the two sides continues unabated. Abbas, for his part, has been reiterating accusations that Hamas has been holding “secret talks” with Israel in Geneva, saying the movement was in no position to claim “a moral high ground”. The accusations, vehemently denied by Hamas, seem to lack credibility unless Abbas and his aides were referring to German-mediated indirect talks about a possible prisoner swap deal between Israel and Hamas. Fatah is particularly worried that the release by Israel of hundreds of Palestinian leaders from Israeli prisons in exchange for the release by Hamas of captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit would be a huge popularity booster for Hamas.

This explains the fact that PA officials have been trying to belittle as much as possible the significance of the prospective deal lest it strengthen Hamas and weaken Fatah. Fatah spokespersons have been attacking Hamas for allegedly agreeing to Israeli demands that an undisclosed number of would-be released Palestinian prisoners would be sent abroad for a number of years. Hamas has not confirmed reports in this regard. Fatah is also worried that the release by Israel of PLO leaders such as Marwan Al-Barghouti, a potential successor to Abbas, and Ahmed Saadat, head of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), would leave Fatah indebted to Hamas and could block Abbas were he to renege on his threat to quit politics.

“Security Beefed Up at Gaza-Egypt Border Ahead of Shalit Transfer”


Almanar

28/11/2009 Voice of Palestine radio quoted Egyptian sources on Saturday as saying that in an unusual move, security around the Rafah border crossing between Gaza and Egypt has been beefed up, speculating that the added security could signal the imminent transfer of captured Israeli occupation soldier Gilad Shalit from Gaza into Egypt.

Shalit was captured by Gaza resistance fighters in 2006 and has been held in captivity for over three years. Hamas, the rulers of the Gaza Strip, have demanded the release of hundreds of Palestinian detainees jailed in Israeli prisons in exchange for Shalit's freedom.

According to the Egyptian sources, "this is an unusual move indicating that the captured soldier Gilad Shalit will be handed over to Cairo very soon."

The sources also said that when Shalit is transferred from Gaza into Egypt he will be examined by Red Cross medical teams as well as Israeli and French teams, in addition to the German mediator. Israel will simultaneously free 1,000 Palestinian detainees, the sources said.

Senior Hamas officials in Damascus told the Palestinian radio station that the organization has agreed in principle to the compromise presented by the German mediator, Channel 10 reported. "We can begin the practical arrangements immediately," one of the officials said.

On Friday, Fox News reported that the prisoner exchange deal was close to completion, and that it will likely be carried out next week.

Sources said Friday that talks aimed at advancing the deal would resume on Monday, when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu returns from his trip to Germany and the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha concludes.

According to Fox, Egyptian sources said that Hamas has yet to respond to Israel's latest objections, but that the latest developments indicate that the differences between the two sides have significantly narrowed.

A major sticking point, the report continued, is a disagreement over where Palestinian detainees from occupied East Jerusalem would be deported to once they are released in the exchange. "What we are seeing now is the end game," Fox News quoted a source close to the negotiations as saying. Both sides, however, also expressed caution that a final agreement is very close, but has not yet been concluded.

Arab media on Thursday reported significant progress in the talks to free the soldier. Senior Hamas officials, namely the heads of Hamas' Damascus-based political bureau, did not say the talks have failed but that a number of clauses in the German mediator's proposal were problematic.

Senior Hamas officials said Thursday that the talks had hit a snag over some of the Palestinian prisoners the Islamic group wants freed, including Marwan Barghouti and Ahmad Sa'adat.

Israel also objects to freeing Israeli Arab detainees as well as several Hamas military wing leaders. Another issue yet to be settled is Israel's demand to deport almost 100 of the 450 "heavy" detainees set to be released in the deal.

The Arab media does not describe these issues as categorical demands, but as points to be sorted out with the help of the German mediator.

Hamas is demanding, among other the detainees, the release of Ibrahim Hamad, head of the group's military wing in the Ramallah area, Abdallah Barghouti, a bomb engineer, and Abbas a-Sayad, the Hamas head in Tul Karm who planned the 2002 operation during Passover in Netanya's Park Hotel. These three detainees are considered responsible for the murder of hundreds of Israelis.

Other names mentioned in the Arab media are Hassan Salame, who was involved in planning the martyrdom bus bombings in the mid '90s, and Jamal Abu al-Hijla, head of Hamas in Jenin, who was convicted of taking part in planning and funding several martyrdom operations during the second intifada.

Another key figure is senior Fatah leader Marwan Barghouti. Israeli Vice Premier Silvan Shalom said earlier this week that Barghouti and Sa'adat, secretary of the Popular Front, would not be freed as part of the Shalit exchange. Over the last two days, Hamas officials have said explicitly that Israel is refusing to release Barghouti.

The Obama administration has in recent weeks pressed Netanyahu to extend good-faith gestures to Abbas, intended to compensate for the predicted blow to Fatah's popularity in the wake of the prisoner exchange deal.

Netanyahu's declaration on Wednesday of a 10-month hiatus in settlement construction is not simply a tardy response to Washington's requests. The U.S. administration will try to present it as an achievement for Abbas as well, despite the Palestinian Authority's disappointment with occupied East Jerusalem's exclusion from the building freeze.

This is the Israel that does not appear in the US press

Link


"Father Samuel Aghoyan, a senior Armenian Orthodox cleric in Jerusalem's Old City, says he's been spat at by young haredi and national Orthodox Jews "about 15 to 20 times" in the past decade. The last time it happened, he said, was earlier this month. "I was walking back from the Church of the Holy Sepulchre and I saw this boy in a yarmulke and ritual fringes coming back from the Western Wall, and he spat at me two or three times." Wearing a dark-blue robe, sitting in St. James's Church, the main Armenian church in the Old City, Aghoyan said, "Every single priest in this church has been spat on. It happens day and night."" (thanks Olivia)


Posted by As'ad at 8:59 AM