Sunday, 2 May 2010

Haneyya calls on the Arabs to patronize reconciliation rather than negotiations

Haneyya calls on the Arabs to patronize reconciliation rather than negotiations

[ 02/05/2010 - 05:01 PM ]

GAZA, (PIC)-- Palestinian premier Ismail Haneyya called on the Arab countries to patronize inter-Palestinian reconciliation rather than resumption of negotiations between the PA in Ramallah and the Israeli occupation authority (IOA).

Haneyya, speaking during a visit at the labor ministry on Sunday, expressed regret at the Arab follow up committee's decision giving cover for indirect talks between the Fatah controlled PA in Ramallah and the IOA.

He said that the decision came in the wake of serious IOA escalation of judaization of occupied Jerusalem, settlement building, and banishment of Palestinians from their homeland.

The premier said that the new round of talks would not be different from the previous ones and would not be of any good to the Palestine cause.

For his part, Dr. Sami Abu Zuhri, a Hamas spokesman, told the PIC on Sunday that former PA chief Mahmoud Abbas's declaration on resumption of talks with the IOA was legitimizing and covering the "Zionist enemy's crimes".

He added that Hamas rejects Abbas's decision, holding him partly responsible for the IOA crimes.

Taher slams Arab-backed PA decision to resume talks with Israel

[ 02/05/2010 - 04:02 PM ]

DAMASCUS, (PIC)-- Dr. Maher Al-Taher, a senior official of the popular front for the liberation of Palestine (PFLP), strongly denounced the Arab-backed decision taken by the Palestinian Authority (PA) to resume indirect negotiations with Israel, saying this decision would cover up settlement and Judaization activities in Palestine.

Dr. Taher warned that there are no Zio-American guarantees for the success of the PA-Israeli peace talks, stressing that the Arab support for the PA decision to restart indirect negotiations with Israel comes after Israeli premier Benjamin Netanyahu dealt several blows to the PA and Arabs who wagered on the option of settlement.

“America always declares it stands by Israel and confirms its commitment to the protection of Israel’s security. It practices a kind of deception and misinformation. There are no guarantees or pledges to freeze settlement and curb Israel,” the PFLP official emphasized.

For its part, the Movement of Islamic Jihad said the decision to resume the PA-Israeli decision was already taken in the White House and the Arabs are deprived of any ability to take any position on the Palestinian cause.

An Islamic Jihad official said in a press release on Sunday that the Arab ministerial meeting lacks any practical value and has no power to decide whether or not to resume negotiations, describing the Arab decision in this regard as a mere political cover-up.

The official stressed that the Palestinian people and the Arab masses are being deceived about the reality of the PA-Israeli negotiations, denying that Israel froze its settlement activities as it claimed earlier and affirming that the facts on the ground prove otherwise.

He added that facts on the ground indicate there is a real threat to the whole Palestinian national project as a result of the impotent official Arab position and the state of weakness which the negotiation team is living in.

For his part, Syrian ambassador to Cairo Yousuf Ahmed criticized the statement issued by the Arab peace initiative committee on the resumption of talks between the PA and Israel.

Ahmed said, following the meeting of the initiative committee, that Syria and other Arab countries have different positions on this statement which contradicted the statement of the Arab summit held a month ago in Libya, which confirmed at the time that there would be no negotiations before a complete cessation of settlement activities or receiving a written US pledge in this regard.

He slammed Mahmoud Abbas for accepting oral reassurances from the American administration, although he experienced many times its positions and pledges.


Israelis, Palestinians 'to Start Talks within Days'

02/05/2010 Israeli and Palestinian officials said Sunday they expected to start indirect peace talks within days, following the Arab League's endorsement of a US-brokered plan to end the impasse.

"From the very start we have been in favor of peace talks without preconditions and the objective is to start in the coming days, at the latest next week," Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon told public radio. "It is a positive development. The Arabs also want to break the deadlock," Ayalon added, referring to the Arab League decision Saturday to back a US plan to mediate talks between the sides as a prelude to direct negotiations.

US President Barack Obama's Mideast envoy George Mitchell is due back in the region for another round of shuttle diplomacy this week and is expected to hold talks with both sides. "President Abbas will meet with Mitchell on Friday," senior Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erakat told AFP.

Abbas said in a newspaper interview published Sunday that with the Arab League giving its blessing and a similar endorsement expected from the Palestine Liberation Organization's executive committee this week, the US- sponsored talks could now go ahead. "They will begin immediately and last for four months," Abbas told the Palestinian daily Al-Ayyam.nHe added that his planned visit to Washington this month will be for bilateral talks with Obama. "There is no plan for a tripartite summit with Netanyahu," he said.


River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Interview with Human Rights Activist Caoimhe Butterly



Mohamad Shmaysani

Blood Line 3
02/05/2010 As the whole world has shifted to the “World Cup mode”, with flags of every participating country seen on balconies, cars, stores, and practically everything in most countries including Arab states, a European young woman has decided to give momentum to the struggle for the rights of the Palestinians in occupied territories and in diaspora.

On May 24, 2010, the Freedom Flotilla sets sail for Gaza determined to, once again, challenge Israel’s blockade of 1.5 million Palestinians trapped in an open-air prison. Under the coordination of the Free Gaza Movement, numerous human rights organizations, including the Turkish Relief Foundation (IHH), the Perdana Global Peace Organization from Malaysia, the European Campaign to End the Siege of Gaza, and the Swedish and Greek Boat to Gaza initiatives will send three cargo ships loaded with reconstruction, medical and educational supplies. At least five passenger boats with over 600 people on board will accompany the cargo ships.
Al-Manar.com.lb interviewed Caoimhe Butterly, the celebrated Irish human rights activist who worked on human rights observation projects and with NGOs in Zimbabwe, Chiapas, Guatemala, Iraq and Palestine. Caoimhe lived in the Jenin refugee camp for a year in 2002 before being shot by Israeli soldiers, then deported.

Ms. Butterly, we’ve been hearing that you and your colleagues have been lobbying in Europe and the Arab world to break the siege of Gaza, again, and deliver a 10,000-ton cargo of supplies to the Gazans, what are you up to?

Butterly: We’re in the process of organizing a flotilla of ships, so basically a sea convoy. We’ve got between eight to ten ships organized by various organizations in Turkey, Greece, Ireland and Sweden that would be participating in this sea flotilla and what we are planning on doing up is meeting in international waters in less than a month with over 10,000 tons of cargo of reconstruction materials, medical supplies, and over 700 participants from around the world including parliamentarians, doctors, human rights activists and media people trying to basically challenge the siege, trying to break through the siege to reach Gaza with both the materials and also the witnesses.

Do you believe your chances are strong to achieve your goal?

Butterly: What we are planning on trying to increase our chances of getting in and what we have been doing for the past few months is doing a lot of political lobbying through meeting with governments that are sympathetic in South Africa, Venezuela, Pakistan, Norway, Ireland, Greece, Sweden, and other countries, the Turkish obviously as well, and trying to get formal positions from them to support us in case of attack or in case we’re stopped and to say that this is a legitimate, humane and legal initiative; that what we are doing is trying to uphold international law and trying to confront the illegal policies of Israel in collectively punishing over 1.5 million people who are imprisoned in the Gaza Strip. So what we are hoping is that there would be a political response and also a response on the level of civil society of trade unions, etc... if we are stopped or attacked. We are hopeful that this would happen; that we have generated hopefully enough media coverage, enough interest and understanding of the necessity of this convoy and that we will have a lot more support than we had in previous missions.

You have been arrested, shot at, and interrogated by the Israeli occupation forces on several occasions, aren’t you afraid of getting arrested again?

Butterly: I think everybody who’s participating in this convoy is aware of the possibility of attack or arrest. We’ve done a lot of training with the participants so that they would be able to know, for instance the process, and their rights if they are arrested, but I think it is a risk that everybody is willing to take. In the face of the sacrifice and daily suffering of the Palestinian people, it is imperative that we act, that we respond in a way that goes beyond demonstrations and speeches but as something practical that is direct and that is part of a sustained campaign, really trying to create a political will, whether or not our governments wanted, but from the grassroots up, further to meet change and that means the implementation of the international law which is not a policy issue, this is something that our governments have to understand, that the hypocrisy and double standards of the implementation of the international law is wrong and that we really have to resist this.

Can we compare between how Israeli security forces treated you as a European during interrogation and how they usually treat Palestinians in similar circumstances?

Butterly: I’ve been arrested before by Israeli security forces, twice by the Shin Bet, when I lived in the West Bank, I was deported both times, I changed my name after the first deportation, went back in and then I was arrested and deported again. It was intimidating, I think, being under interrogation, but I knew that my passport served in some protection and that whatever I experienced was nothing compared to what Palestinian men and women experience when they are arrested and often tortured, so it was okay.

What about the campaign in Europe, the fundraising, and the public awareness you’re trying to establish?

Buttelry: The campaign in Europe surrounding this flotilla is definitely gaining momentum. We have hundreds of volunteers working in many different countries, who are helping us to fundraise, to raise awareness and profile of the campaign, to media work, to do public talks and presentations. We’re getting cargo donated from all across Europe; we’re getting 50 tons of paper for printing presses in Gaza donated by people in Norway and another 50 tons of medical relief donated by different mosques and Islamic organizations throughout Europe, and 700 tons of cement for the Irish ship. Altogether we’re hoping to carry over 10,000 tons of humanitarian relief to Gaza. So the response has been very positive, people are definitely aware, they’re active and they’re involved. I think that even if we are blocked or attacked, that in itself, will be a success...having mobilized people, having reminded them of the urgency of the siege and the occupation in general.

In terms of fundraising, what we are trying to do is work on many different levels. One is on the level of business people, of asking businessmen and women to donate large amounts towards the boats and towards the cargo. Another thing that we’re doing on a more popular level is asking families in Ireland to donate a minimum of 5 Euros for bags of cement. So that means that they can sponsor one bag or two bags or ten bags for 50 Euros, or whatever they choose. A hospital can donate a hundred bags to a hospital in Gaza, save a five hundred Euros, or a school can do so likewise. The idea behind this is not only to raise money; it’s also to raise public awareness. So it means that if a family donates five Euros then they feel that they are invested in the flotilla, they watch it on the news, if something happens they’d respond and they’d feel outraged. So it’s a way of politicizing people as well.

Is the Arab world taking the role it should be taking with regards to your campaign?

Butterly: Yes, we’ve got a lot of different volunteers from throughout the Arab World; a lot of our fundraising has been done in the Arab World principally with diaspora Palestinians but also in other countries with people from really across the Arab World. There is also going to be many people from across the Arab World participating in the flotilla in the sea convoy, so there would be people from Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, across the Gulf from Algeria, Morocco, etc. So there is definitely a lot of Arab participation and we really hope that this would grow because one of our main objectives is to build a movement which is not relying on foreigners or Westerners that can be something that has a very strong Arab identity as well, and that’s why for instance, Viva Palestina is thinking of the next convoy to be a Viva Palestina Arabiya. We’re hoping that the next sea convoy would have a large numbers of Arab activists. I think this is essential to really highlight the hypocrisy and double standards of Arab regimes by people refusing basically to obey the complicity of their governments in Zionist expansion, and actually struggle against it very directly.

How did you receive the news of gassing four young Palestinians in tunnels last week?

Butterly: The killing of the four young men in the tunnel yesterday, unfortunately, is part of a deliberate policy, not only of the Israeli government but also of the Egyptian government of collectively punishing the people of Gaza for their democratically elected choice of a government. The four young men that were killed yesterday were ones, and unfortunately, of over 160 young men of who have been killed or martyred in the tunnels over the past years of the siege. And I think that these are some of the silent death that go on and there have been over now 400 Palestinian men, women and children who have died of preventable diseases because of the siege, like cancer and kidney failure, because both the Israelis and Egyptians refuse them the right to travel abroad to get medical care or have the operations they need. So, unfortunately, I think this is yet another example of the criminal complicity of the Egyptian government in their participation in the siege, and if Rafah was open there would not be near the level of humanitarian crisis as there is in Gaza at the moment, so I think that really the Egyptian government have blood on their hands, not just the blood of the four young men yesterday but also the blood of people, for instance, during the massacres when the Egyptian government closed Rafah would not let the wounded out, for very long time would not let humanitarian workers and doctors in and it’s shameful and it’s something that should really be exposed.

Ms Butterly, what is the message that you’d like to convey through Al-Manar’s Website to the Gazans who are waiting for you and to the world as well?

Butterly: I think our message for Gazans, before we God willing get there, is that they are not alone. There are millions of people across the world, not only who feel the pain of the occupation, who feel deep grief and outrage when they witness the daily oppression of the Palestinian people but there are also millions of people across the world who deeply respect the endurance and the courage and the steadfastness of the Palestinian people, and I think that’s a very important message that we need to deliver, that we don’t just see Palestinians as victims of Israeli war crimes. They are victims, but they are also survivors, they are also proud, dignified and unbroken people. I think that it is very important that be present in everything that we say; it’s not that we are reducing the Palestinian struggle down just to a humanitarian case. It’s not that we think that we can throw a few thousand tons of cement and medicine in the Gaza Strip and that’s it. On the contrary, what we are struggling for, hand in hand, with Palestinian brothers, sisters and comrades, is for the liberation of Palestine, is for the right of return, for all of the exiled refugees in diaspora and the release of over 11,000 Palestinian political prisoners. It is also for the implementation of international law. So I think it is important that our messages are clear, that it’s not that we are going to Gaza out of pity, we’re going there out of admiration, love, and respect and we learn from the daily example of the Palestinian people and all people, internationally, who resist, who struggle and who refuse to be broken.


River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

IOF soldiers suppress Palestinian anti-wall march, wound 7 civilians


IOF soldiers suppress Palestinian anti-wall march, wound 7 civilians

[ 02/05/2010 - 05:03 PM ]

BETHLEHEM, (PIC)-- Israeli occupation forces (IOF) used violent means to suppress a peaceful Palestinian anti-wall march in Beit Jala village, Bethlehem district, on Sunday during which 7 Palestinian civilians were hurt.

Eyewitnesses said that a massive demonstration passed in the town's streets before heading to the racist, separation wall while hoisting anti wall slogans and Palestinian flags.

They said that dozens of IOF soldiers intercepted the march, including foreign activists, and installed barbed wire in the road to block the marchers from reaching the construction site of the separation wall.

The troops beat up the demonstrators leading to violent clashes in which the troops used rubber coated bullets, teargas canisters and stun grenades while the participants threw stones.

Two of the wounded persons, who were young women, fainted in the process while a cameraman was hit with a gas bomb in his face and was carried to hospital and the other casualties suffered injures with rubber bullets.

IOF soldiers quell peaceful Palestinian march

[ 02/05/2010 - 11:11 AM ]

AL-KHALIL, (PIC)-- Israeli occupation forces (IOF) quelled afternoon Saturday a peaceful Palestinian march in Beit Ummar village, north of Al-Khalil, and beat up many of its participants.

Local sources said that the IOF soldiers used violence to quell the weekly march in solidarity with farmers whose lands are adjacent to an Israeli settlement and are banned from cultivating them.

They said that the soldiers fired gas and sonic bombs at the march, in which foreign activists participated, and added that tens were treated for breathing difficulties while a Palestinian activist was hit with a gas bomb in his face.

In Al-Khalil city, a society against Israeli settlement activity and occupation organized its weekly sit-in with the participation of dozens of citizens and foreign activists.

Participants hoisted Palestinian flags and slogans against occupation and presence of settlers in the city before marching in the Old City of Al-Khalil.

IOF soldiers went on provocative patrols in the Old City and in the villages of Beit Ummar and Al-Arub refugee camp to the north of the city.


River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Egypt's opposition demands arresting Netanyahu for "war crimes"


Representatives of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Kifaya (Enough) coalition, along with a number of independent politicians filed a report to state prosecutor Abdel Meguid Mahmoud demanding the immediate arrest of Netanyahu when he arrives in Egypt Monday for talks with President Hosny Mubarak.

The Brotherhood and Kifaya are considered Egypt's largest opposition groups. In 2005 parliamentary elections, the Brotherhood won 20 per cent of the popular vote.

"Our demand is based on a number of international reports about the Israeli offensive on Gaza, including the Goldstone report," said opposition journalist Abdel-Halim Qandil, the current head of the Kifaya coalition.

The fact-finding mission of Justice Richard Goldstone last year charged that war crimes may have taken place during the 2008-2009 three-week-long Israeli offensive in the Gaza Strip, which left some 1,300 Palestinians and 13 Israelis dead.

At the time, Netanyahu was not prime minister.

"We also filed a separate legal memorandum reviewing evidence of Netanyahu's war crimes in Gaza based on international laws," Qandil added.

Meeting at the Red Sea resort of Sharm al-Sheikh, Netanyahu and Mubarak are expected to discuss Palestinian-Israeli "proximity" talks, which Washington said will resume next week.

On Saturday, the Arab League gave its blessing to the indirect talks. Egypt has been a key player in the negotiations, which were suspended in late 2008.

The Muslim Brotherhood's Mohamed al-Beltagi said that the report is a "a political message to emphasize that receiving Netanyahu in Sharm al-Sheikh is rejected by the people."

The independent-daily al-Masry al-Youm on Saturday quoted Egypt's ambassador to Israel, Yasser Reda, as saying that "the Egyptian opposition isn't opposed to the peace treaty or Israel."

"Those people don't want war. Most of the world wants peace," he said at a Tel Aviv University after expressing his hopes of seeing a football match played between the Egyptian and Israeli national teams in the near future.

Despite being the first Arab country to sign a peace treaty with Israel in 1979, the question of normalizing relations remains a hot topic of debate in Egypt, where many reject the idea of direct relations with Israel.

Copyright DPA

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

IOA demolishes Palestinian home in Taiba


[ 02/05/2010 - 11:06 AM ]

RAMALLAH, (PIC)-- The Israeli occupation authority (IOA) razed a Palestinian home in Taiba, in the Triangle area occupied in 1948, at a late hour on Saturday rendering its residents homeless.

Israeli occupation policemen, backed by a helicopter, clashed with inhabitants of the town, who objected to the demolition, and arrested three young men.

Local sources said that the policemen closed many streets leading to the demolition site.

In another incident, the IOA imposed house arrest on Ahmed Al-Jallad, a Jerusalemite, after one month of questioning in Maskobeh and other detention centers.

The IOA has pursued such a policy as a new quelling method in occupied Jerusalem.

Meanwhile, Israeli occupation forces (IOF) rounded up five Palestinians in Jenin and Al-Khalil districts at dawn Sunday at the pretext they were wanted for interrogation.

IOF troops also combed a number of villages in Jenin and Tobas districts.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

loaded opposition

In Gaza


One can imagine that were US soldiers to open fire with live ammunition on American protesters, this would not be acceptable. Likewise for Canada and most democratic nations.

Yet somehow there is a void, a gaping hole in the media into which fall most potential reports on Israeli soldiers shooting with live ammunition on visibly unarmed demonstraters.

When Palestine is too far away, too “over there” and mired in “age-old conflict” for mild news viewers and readers to understand, perhaps the simple comparison of “would we accept this for ourselves?” is more apt.

Would we accept that a young man in his early twenties is shot dead for prancing on his land, gleefully laughing in the faces of armed (Israeli) soldiers, delighting in accessing land that had been unilaterally cut off from him and its owners… should be shot dead for it?

Sure, it was a shot in the leg…but then it was aimed at the artery, wasn’t it? And don’t most people understand that arteries bleed hard and heavily, that one can die from a wound to the artery. Israeli soldiers certainly know this, which is most likely why the sniper aimed for the artery.

Would we accept that another group, carrying a large and clearly printed banner on more unilaterally-forbidden land, be shot at with live ammunition? That the bullets would pierce the banner, endangering the lives of those holding and behind it? That puffs of dust would arise from bullets striking just metres from our feet?

Would we accept this land annexation in the first place? Give up our right to live on, work, and access our land, because a bullying state said it is for their security? Would we be able to look across the devasted, bulldozed, rendered-lifeless land, across a fortified fence to lush, fragrant land being worked with tractors on the other side…and believe that the destruction of our land was actually for ‘security’?
No, we’d cry racism. We’d scream for our rights. We’d demand the media take notice. We’d demand the support of other “freedom-loving, democratic” nations.

Who the hell is not freedom-loving? Who doesn’t want to access their land? Who doesn’t die inside because they cannot provide for their children?

Would we be as composed, gracious, generous and welcoming as Palestinians if we had endured the decades of suffering, mockery, dispossession, lies, broken promises, massacres, and being the black sheep of the media?

It is never acceptable for Israeli soldiers to use live ammunition against unarmed protesters, not in Gaza, not in the occupied West Bank or East Jerusalem.

But they do, and it’s no diversion from Israeli policy.



Palestinian minister of detainees holds Israel responsible for death of Zedat


[ 02/05/2010 - 11:02 AM ]
OCCUPIED JERUSALEM, (PIC)-- Palestinian minister of prisoners’ affairs Mohamed Al-Ghoul held the Israeli occupation authority (IOA) fully responsible for the death of cancer patient Fayez Zedat, an ex-detainee in its jails.

In a press release on Saturday, Ghoul said the IOA deliberately did not provide Zedat with appropriate medical treatment at an earlier stage of his cancer which later spread throughout his body until he was released in June last year after he reached the brink of death.

“The occupation intentionally leaves imprisoned patients without treatment until diseases take hold in their bodies and kill them without mercy,” the minister stressed.

He appealed to concerned international organizations to urgently move to follow up the health conditions of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails, noting that there are more than 1,600 patients in prison, 16 of them suffer from cancer.

The minister also pointed out that the IOA blackmails patients in its jails through offering them to receive medical treatment abroad in exchange for accepting to be exiled from Palestine.

In a related incident, Hamas-affiliated prisoner Mazen Fuqaha appealed to human rights organizations to intervene to put an end to his health suffering in light of the deliberate medical neglect policy pursued against detainees in Israeli jails.

Prisoner Fuqaha told his family that he suffers from a deviation in his left eye, burning eyes, severe migraine, and ongoing stomachache.

He called for necessarily sending specialist doctors to see his medical condition and pressuring the IOA to stop the slow death sentence issued against him, affirming that the prison authority uses the policy of medical neglect as a delayed death sentence against prisoners.


River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Arab MPs in “Israel” condemn the “racist campaign” against them

by Tony Auth
Middle East Monitor, May 1, 2010

Arab members of the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, have reiterated the right of Palestinian citizens to communicate with the outside world, especially in the Middle East. The MPs’ statement came in response to moves in the Knesset to strip some Arab MPs of their parliamentary immunity for taking part in a Palestinian delegation to Libya.

The president of the “Assembly” parliamentary coalition, Jamal Zahalka MP, is confident that attempts by the Israeli government to put barriers between the outside world and the Palestinians who live in Israel “will not work”. Mr. Zahalka added, “We will break through all barriers and ghettos which are built by the Israeli government, and will not be deterred from communicating with the Arab world by right-wing attacks and the government’s decisions.”

Pointing out that the Israeli parliament is to hold a special meeting to discuss the possibility of stripping parliamentary immunity from those who visited Libya, Mr. Zahalka said that the Arab members of the Knesset will boycott such moves. He described such sessions as “racist parties” and likened them to a military court. “We are not guilty of any crime,” he said. “We have merely exercised our right and duty. This racially motivated campaign is based on the Israeli belief that our visit to Libya poses a threat to the state.”

The President of the Democratic Front for Peace and Equality, Mohamed Baraka MP, called the parliamentary move “close to Nazi practices”.

“Neither Israel nor the Knesset nor the right-wing MPs can formulate a new identity or history for the Arab minority in Israel,” said Hanin El-Zoghbi MP. The relationship between Israel’s Arab minority and the rest of the Arab world has to be respected by Israel, she added.

Mohamed Zidane, the Chairman of the High Committee for Follow up on the Palestinians’ Rights in the Territories Occupied in 1948, called Israel’s campaign against the Arab MPs’ visit to Libya “a desperate campaign of racism which seeks to destroy the national, cultural and human rights of the Palestinian people.”
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

If someone announced that Hezbollah has nuclear weapons, Hezbollah would not deny that."

Sayyed Nasrallah: Hezbollah Has the Right to Possess Any Weapon

Live Arabic Speach

01/05/2010 Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah on Friday announced that "the party is working for consensus in Beirut as to the municipal elections, and up till now, it hasn't taken a final decision as to engaging in Beirut's electoral battle."

Sayyed Nasrallah added that Hezbollah will take the appropriate decision after concluding the exerted efforts to achieve consensus.

During a ceremony to honor the members of the Islamic Resistance Support Organization, his eminence called for "keeping the resistance away from the municipal elections," stressing that "those who don't join the Hezbollah-AMAL consensus electoral lists are not against the resistance and they have the right to run for municipal elections."

Concerning the Israeli threats and US-Israeli claims about Scud missiles, the Hezbollah Secretary General said that "the Israeli and U.S. remarks about transferring Scud missiles to Hezbollah aim at pressuring the resistance forces and the defiance nations and at waging an intimidation campaign, not more," ruling out "the eruption of a war in the region in the current period because there are no political objectives to be achieved (by Israel) through war."

Sayyed Nasrallah stressed that the resistance party “has the right to possess any weapon, but its policy implies that it abstains from denying or confirming any information about the type of weapons it has; and if someone announced that Hezbollah has nuclear weapons, Hezbollah would not deny that."


River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Barhoum: American guarantees to Arabs a ploy

Barhoum: American guarantees to Arabs a ploy

[ 02/05/2010 - 09:49 AM ]

GAZA, (PIC)-- The continued Arab cover for the "futile" talks with the "Zionist entity" reflects the state of weakness and desperation of the Arab regimes and the Ramallah authority in the face of American pressures, Fawzi Barhoum, a Hamas spokesman, said on Saturday night.

Barhoum told the PIC that the Arab decision to back indirect talks between the PA in Ramallah and Israel meant bowing to Zio-American dictates.

Commenting on the Arab initiative committee's decision in Cairo, he said that the reported American guarantees were nothing more than a new "ploy", adding that giving a new opportunity for negotiations was a gift for the Israeli occupation government.

The spokesman said that any form of negotiations would only serve as a cover for the Israeli judaization and colonization efforts and aggression other than tampering with the future of the Palestinian people and their main issues.

He warned that such a position would obstruct international legal prosecution of "Zionist enemy leaders" for their crimes and violations against the Palestinian people.

The Arab committee reiterated commitment to its 3/3/2010 statement that gave the American mediation efforts a four-month period to progress talks or else it would head to the UN Security Council for an in-depth discussion of the Palestine cause and the Israeli obstinacy in this regard.

In a separate statement issued in Damascus on Sunday, Hamas expressed dismay at the Arab committee's decision despite the Israeli disrespect of the Arab position and its rejection of its March statement.

Israel continues to judaize occupied Jerusalem and to allow desecration and attacks on the Aqsa Mosque in addition to persisting in settlement projects, siege of Gaza and deportation of Palestinians, the statement pointed out.

It said that the Arab committee's position meant an acceptance of the Israeli de facto conditions in addition to providing a cover for more Israeli crimes.
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

South African minister: We support the Palestinians’ struggle for liberation

[ 02/05/2010 - 09:33 AM ]

GAZA, (PIC)-- Deputy foreign minister of South Africa Ibrahim Ibrahim stated Saturday during a visit to the Gaza Strip that his country supports the Palestinian people and their struggle for liberation and the establishment of an independent state with Jerusalem as its capital.

Ibrahim told a news conference that he met with Palestinian premier Ismail Haneyya and senior Hamas official Mahmoud Al-Zahhar, and visited some bombed areas and families of victims within a visit to observe the humanitarian situation in Gaza.

He expressed his deep sorrow to see how Palestinian children were killed during the Israeli aggression on Gaza and the daily suffering of civilians under the Israeli blockade.

The official strongly denounced the continued closure of the Rafah border crossing, affirming that he discussed this issue with Egyptian officials and there would be other meetings with them in this regard.

For his part, Palestinian deputy minister of foreign affairs Ahmed Yousuf expressed his appreciation for this visit, especially since South Africa makes special efforts to break the siege on Gaza, noting that this African country was and still is one of the first states to have been in contact with the Palestinian government since it was formed in 2006.

Yousuf pointed out that Ibrahim would carry a letter from Haneyya to the president of South Africa that highlights a number of important issues.

Earlier on the same day, premier Haneyya hailed during his meeting with Ibrahim and his accompanying delegation the efforts made by South Africa to help the Palestinian people, especially at the political level.

Haneyya also appreciated the role of South Africa as a member of the UN Security Council in tabling the Palestinian cause at international meetings and its diligent attempts to break the blockade imposed on Gaza.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Hezbollah Slams Roed-Larsen's Interference in Lebanese Affairs

01/05/2010 Hezbollah on Friday slammed "interference in Lebanese affairs" by U.N. envoy Terje Roed-Larsen and warned that its arsenal was off-limits after the diplomat accused what he described as "militias" of creating tension in Lebanon.

"Hezbollah condemns this attempt to create dissent and strife among the Lebanese under the guise of advice and guidance," Hezbollah said in a statement.

"Roed-Larsen's continuous attempts to interfere in Lebanese affairs and incite the Lebanese to fight one another are unacceptable for an international official working for peace in the region," it said.

On Thursday, the U.N. envoy had warned of the need to address the presence in Lebanon of "heavily armed militias," which he said was a violation of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1559, adopted in 2004. The resolution calls for "the disbanding and disarmament of all militias in the country."

Roed-Larsen didn’t mention the ongoing Israeli violations for the Lebanese space and territories.

"As long as these unresolved issues are there, for instance the existence of heavily armed militias in Lebanon... there will always be tension," Roed-Larsen said after briefing the Security Council on a report on the implementation of Resolution 1559.

But Hezbollah warned that its arms were "only to be discussed among the Lebanese as part of a comprehensive national defense strategy, and neither Roed-Larsen nor any other officials, international or not, can interfere."


River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Canadian/Israeli Stamp Of Shame





26 April, 2010
Countercurrents.org

Canada had declared the issuance of a “Canada-Israel Diplomatic Relations” commemorative stamp to celebrate 60 years of relations between the two countries.

This stamp will serve as a historical witness and reminder, for many future generations in the whole world, of the inhuman, unethical and immoral Canadian association with and support to the ultimate religiously racist, self-worshipping, rogue, international-law-breaking, murdering, genocidal, ecocidal, and terrorist bastard state of Israel.

Israel is established and based on the ultimate supremacist racist ideology. It is a religious ideology that has surpassed all other racist ideologies Man had ever known throughout history. Whereas German Nazism is a social ideology, and Italian Fascism is a political ideology, that can be opposed, debated and debunked, Israel’s “God’s chosen people in God’s promised land” is a supremacist ideology cloaked within a religious cover. Its opposition is labeled atheism, its debate is called blasphemy, and its debunking is claimed a sin. This ideology is, after all, a divine contract between God and Abraham signed by circumcision in the foreskin of Abraham’s penis. Jewish Israelis consider themselves God’s gift to this world. All other nations, Goyims, non-Jews, are considered animal souls incarnated in human bodies, whose sole purpose of existence is to serve the Jews. One needs only read the Old Testament, the Talmud, Jewish religious books, and Rabbinical texts and pamphlets to learn and to confirm this supremacist ideology.

Israeli Jewish religious supremacy and self-worship beliefs are reflected in their Rabbis’ teachings and statements. This religious arrogance is expressed clearly in Rabbi Ginsburgh’s justification of the Israeli army murdering Palestinian civilians when he declared that: “Jewish blood and a goy’s (gentile’s) blood are not the same … every single cell in a Jewish body entails divinity, and is thus part of God, thus killing isn’t murder if the victim is a Gentile.” Israeli chief Rabbi Yosef Obadia described Palestinians as cockroaches that should be crushed. Such ideology is the basic fundamental teachings Judaic Yeshivot (religious schools) incorporate in their so-called religious curricula.

Unlike all other countries Israel has no a cceptance or tolerance to other religions. Although supremacist Judaism is tolerated and Jews are permitted free worship in every Christian and Moslem country, even in Iran, falsely accused of being fanatic Islamic, Arab Christians and Moslems are harshly rejected, persecuted, and equally ethnically cleansed in “Jewish only Israel”. Jews were persecuted by all western Christian countries for the last two thousand years. They found refuge and acceptance only in the Middle Eastern mainly Islamic Arab countries. Yet instead of expressing any form of simple gratitude they have forcefully occupied Palestine. They are now evicting Christian and Moslem Palestinians out of their own country and especially out of their holiest city; Al-Quds (Jerusalem), and are denying them worship in their holy places during their religious holidays. Israel had destroyed hundreds of mosques and bombed and burnt many churches.

Many western Christians are deceived and are misguided by the so-called Zionist-Christianity and Judea-Christianity. These are antithetical terms, for Judaism considers Christianity its arch-enemy. Judaism considers Virgin Mary a whore, and calls Jesus Christ a pervert, Satan, and charlatan. Jews had crucified Jesus for his teachings of loving God, who loves all his creations equally without any favoritism to a specific nation.

Israel is a genocidal state. Israeli Jews like to proudly trace their history back to Moses and his commandments. An objective study of Moses’s Five Books reveals that Moses was the most genocidal figure in the history of mankind. He, himself, had broken all his ten commandments. Moses had preached many other commandments that are racist to the core in the form of laws and regulations for the favor of only Jews. He and his racist God had destroyed Egypt seven times. He had ordered his followers to utterly annihilate other nations including babies and pregnant women (Numbers 31:17). Even the homes, the crops, the farm animals of other nations were ordered killed, burnt and destroyed; “you shall let nothing that breathes remain alive, but you shall utterly destroy them; the Hittite and the Amorite and the Canaanite and the Perizzite and the Hivite and the Jebusites, just as the Lord your God has commanded you” (Deuteronomy 20: 16-17) Moses ordered the Israelites.

He and his God were genocidal even against their own followers; Moses’s God supposedly annihilated the Israelite tribes of Korah, Dathan and Abiram in a fiery earthquake for objecting to Moses’s leadership (Numbers 16), and Moses ordered the sons of Levi to murder their Jewish brothers, companions and neighbors (Exodus 32: 27-28). Moses had even killed his brother Aaron (Numbers 20: 23-29), who was allegedly “gathered to his people” at mount Hor.

Moses’s genocidal crimes are grotesquely documented in his five books in the Old Testament. The Israelites eventually got fed up with his genocidal frenzy that he “mysteriously”, or divinely as they claim, disappeared and no family member of this divine prophet was ever mentioned in the Jewish history since then.
Unfortunately Moses’s genocidal commandments had become so fundamental Judaic teachings that all present-day chief Rabbis of Israel are quoting them to incite and to justify Israeli genocide and holocaust of Palestinians. The Old Testaments tells us how Jewish Rabbis and so-called prophets commanded their people, in the name of their God, to annihilate non-Jews, to destroy their cities, to kill their animals, and to cut down their trees.

Today’s Israeli Jewish Rabbis are no better than their ancestors. They, too, call for the extermination of Palestinians, the destruction of their towns, the killing of their farm animals and the cutting down of their fruit trees. Israel’s former chief Rabbi, Mordechai Elyahu encouraged the Israeli army to mass murder Palestinian civilians; “even murdering a million”. The Hasidic Rabbi Manis Friedman urged the Israeli army to murder Palestinian civilians regardless of their age. He declared: “The only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way: destroy their holy sites, kill men, women, children, and cattle.”

Israeli Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira, the head of a Yishuv in illegal colony of Yitzhar in usurped Palestinian city of Nablus in the Occupied West Bank, had published a religious book distributed to Israeli soldiers before their onslaught against Gaza December 2008. The book called “The King Torah” is based on the halachic (Jewish religious) laws for the killing of non-Jews. Shapiro wrote that “Jews have the right to kill non-Jews in just about every circumstance … If we kill a gentile who has sinned or has violated one of the (Jewish) seven commandments … there is nothing wrong with the murder.” Jewish Rabbis’ disregard to non-Jewish nationals was exposed when Israeli Rabbis and Israeli army officers were caught traffic with human body parts in Palestine and in Haiti.

Before the illegal declaration of Israel, Jewish terrorist groups such as Lehi, Irgun and Haganah had perpetrated many massacres against civilian Palestinians. These terrorist groups merged together to form the terrorist Israeli army. For the last 62 years this terrorist army had committed numerous massacres against all its Arab neighbors; Palestinians, Egyptians, Jordanians, Syrians, and Lebanese. Their murdering and assassination arms have reached far other countries such as South Africa, Sudan, Somalia, Algiers, Turkey, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, and lately Dubai. This so-called most moral army finds its morality in spreading terror through the use of the American most sophisticated weapons against unarmed Arab civilians especially women and children. To understand why Israel had waged so many wars throughout its short history one should know that Israel is an army with a government rather than a government with an army. Its survival depends on perpetual conflict; the real reason for Israel’s continuous rejection of all Arab peace initiatives.

Besides crimes against humanity Israel is committing daily crimes against mother earth and against the environment. Israelis keep claiming that they came to a desert and made it bloom. The reverse is true. Part of what is known as the Middle Eastern Fertile Crescent, Palestine is a very fertile land. Its fertility had been for thousands of years the target of all colonial powers. In their genocidal fever the Israelis had uprooted millions of fruit trees, especially olive trees that were cared for by Palestinians for two thousand years.
The 2007 report published by Applied Research Institute-Jerusalem documented that Israel had uprooted 1,000,000 fruit trees in the Occupied West Bank between 1967 and 1999, and an additional 1,405,658 trees from 2000-2006. The building of the Israeli apartheid wall has caused the uprooting of at least another million trees.

Israel’s use of nuclear (DU), biological, and chemical weapons during its aggression against Lebanon and Gaza had contaminated earth and rivers. The razing of fertile land, the poisoning of water wells, the destruction of farm land, and the aerial chemical spraying of Palestinian crops and trees, which are part of a deliberate plan to destroy Palestinian economy, are grave crimes against Mother Nature and against the environment.

Israel is the most anti-Semitic country. Arabs are Semites, while the majority of Israeli Jews are Khazars and Germanic. Israeli Jews are not one ethnic nation. Walking through any Israeli city one encounters highly differentiated people, who came from different countries with different backgrounds that have nothing to do with Semitic people. Judaism is a religion that is adopted by people from different parts of the world and rather than an ethnic nationality. Not all Jews are Semitic the same way that not all Moslems are Arabs and not all Christians are part of one particular race.


Since the first Zionist Congress in 1897 in Basel, Switzerland up to this very day, every Zionist leader and every Zionist Rabbi had openly called for the ethnic cleansing and forceful eviction of Palestinian Arabs from Palestine. The Zionist Koenig Memorandum encouraged Israeli army to use terror, assassination, intimidation, eviction and land confiscation among other terrorist tactics to terrorize Palestinians out of their country.

It would take large volumes to enumerate Israel’s crimes against humanity and against mother earth. With their at least 200 nuclear bombs and their aggressive posture continuously threatening to bomb their neighbors back to stone age, it is the fanatic self-worshipping Israelis, not the Iranians, who pose the greatest threat to peace in the Middle East and threat to global peace.

With such criminal history I ask descent Canadians whether they really want to associate themselves with such a terrorist state and become a terrorist-sponsoring country. I urge Canadians, specifically, and peace loving people in general, to express their disappointment in Canada’s decision to issue such a shameful postal stamp by writing/emailing to the minister responsible for Canada Post Corporation; Mr. John Baird (baird.j@parl.gc.ca) and to Minister of State Rob Merrifield (Merrifield.R@parl.gc.ca).
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Pentagon Map Shows Wide Taliban Zone in the South


Pentagon Map Shows Wide Taliban Zone in the South

by Gareth Porter, May 01, 2010

The Pentagon was still trying to spin its report on the war in Afghanistan issued this week as holding out hope because the instability had leveled off, even as some news outlets were noting that it documents the continued expansion of Taliban capabilities and operations.

The most significant revelation in the report, however, is that Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal and the U.S.-NATO International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) joint command now acknowledge officially that the Taliban insurgents dominate a vast contiguous zone of heavily populated territory across southern Afghanistan that McChrystal regards as the most critical area in the country.

The report admits that the population in key districts across most southern provinces is sympathetic to or supportive of the insurgents.

The contiguous zone of Taliban political power stretches all the way across the 13 provinces from Farah province in the far west of the country through Helmand and Kandahar to Wardak, Logar, Paktia and Khost provinces west and south of Kabul.

The extent of Taliban political power in southern Afghanistan, which had not been acknowledged previously by ISAF, is documented in a map showing an "overall assessment of key districts" as of Mar. 18.

The map shows for the first time the location and political and security status of 121 districts chosen late last year by planners on McChrystal’s International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) Joint Staff as the most important for a strategy of weakening the Taliban gains.

The contiguous Taliban zone includes but is not limited to 58 of the 121 key districts, of which seven have populations assessed as "supporting" the Taliban, 25 with populations "sympathetic" to the Taliban, and 21 with populations that are "neutral".

Only five of the districts within that zone are shown as having populations that are "sympathetic to" the Afghan government and none that are "supporting" the government.

The degree of Taliban political dominance in the south is partly obscured, however, by an obvious effort to portray the attitudes of the population in Helmand and Kandahar provinces more favorably than is reflected in reports from those locations.

Eight of the "neutral" districts shown on the map are in Helmand province, where it has acknowledged in the past that the population was largely sympathetic to the Taliban.

The districts of Nad Ali, in which Marja is located, Naw Zad, Lashkar Gah and Sangin are all shown on the map as having "neutral" populations, even though it has been well documented that the populations of those heavily opium poppy-growing districts had turned decisively against the government and foreign troops over government eradication efforts and the abusive behavior of police associated with local warlords.

The population of Nad Ali had been shown in an assessment in late December as being supportive of the Taliban. Naw Zad and Sangin districts, on the other hand, had been assessed as "neutral" in December.

A report by The Guardian’s Jon Boone last week quoted a recent British visitor to Sangin as remarking on the "intense hatred of people who hate everything you stand for" he had felt from people there.

McChrystal’s staff apparently defined "neutral" so as to include populations in districts where U.S. and NATO forces have carried out operations aimed at clearing the Taliban and are now the object of attempts to change their political views.

Earlier this year, however, an ISAF official familiar with the assessment on which the command was basing its plans clearly included those same districts among those in which the Taliban were regarded as having gotten popular support. The official told IPS in an interview in late January, "We have a system of 80 districts where Taliban influence is strongest, where people support the Taliban for whatever reason."

That set of 80 districts that are the most pro-Taliban in the country is same set of 80 "Key Terrain districts" defined in the new Pentagon report as "areas the control of (and support from which) provides a marked advantage to either the Government of Afghanistan or the insurgents."

The ISAF official also said that "about one-fourth" of the 80 districts in which the Taliban had the strongest support would be in the "contiguous security zone" that ISAF was planning to establish in Helmand and Kandahar provinces this year. That coincides with the 19 districts in those two provinces that are shown on the Dec. 24 assessment map as "neutral", "sympathetic" to the Taliban or "supportive" of the Taliban.

If the districts labeled on the map as "neutral" are understood to be pro-Taliban as well, the districts in all three categories form an almost unbroken chain of territory with populations leaning toward the Taliban across the full length of the Pashtun south.

The 80 districts described by the ISAF official in January as providing the strongest support to the Taliban apparently included only those pro-Taliban districts that had the largest population and were closest to the major lines of communications. The list does not include a large number of other districts in several Pashtun provinces of the south where the Taliban insurgents predominate but which are farther from the major roads.

The evidence of a coherent Taliban zone of political control in the new Pentagon assessment is consistent with an Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) Provincial/District Threat Assessment as of Apr. 23, 2009, which was reported by BBC last August. An ANSF security map reflecting the ASNF assessment showed almost every district in the Pashtun south except for Nimruz province as being either "high risk" or Taliban-controlled.

Although McChrystal seemed to reject the idea that the Taliban had broad political support in his initial assessment last August, an "integrated campaign plan" jointly agreed by McChrystal and U.S. Ambassador Karl Eikenberry that same month hinted strongly at such support in Pashtun areas.

The campaign plan document concluded, "Key groups have become nostalgic for the security and justice Taliban rule provided."

McChrystal’s announcement earlier this year that ISAF would establish a "contiguous security zone" which would include the bulk of the population of Helmand and Kandahar provinces may have been a response to the recognition that the Taliban had formed its own zone of political dominance in southern Afghanistan.

However, given recent evidence that foreign troops have been unable to clear insurgents from Marja, and that local leaders and elders in Kandahar are opposing U.S. military operations in and around the city, that objective now appears to be well beyond the reach of U.S. and NATO troops.


River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

France implicated in Hariri murder case

Press TV reports:

A witness who gave false testimony in the case of the murder of the former Lebanese premier says France had provided him with a forged passport to help him get away with perjury.

A report by the Volatairenet website said that France had provided Mohammed Zuhair Siddiq -- the key witness in the case of Rafiq Hariri's murder -- with a forged passport to grant him immunity from prosecution.

The report came amid accusations by the US and Israel against Syria and Hezbollah, claiming that traces of their involvement were found in Hariri's assassination in 2005.

According to the report, a UN probe committee headed by German prosecutor Detlev Mehlis had relied on the testimony given by Siddiq, who claimed to be a former senior Syrian intelligence official.

In his testimony, Siddiq had accused the Syrian and Lebanese presidents of masterminding the murder. He also accused seven Syrian and four Lebanese generals of organizing the assassination.

After presenting his testimony, Siddiq took refuge in the Spanish property of Rifaat al-Assad, who is the pro-US uncle of incumbent Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

Siddiq was then offered support by the French General Directorate for External Security (DGSE).

While being under the protection of DGSE, the French police department eavesdropped on his telephone calls and found out that Siddiq had lied to the tribunal tasked with probing Hariri's murder case that he was a senior Syrian official.

It was later reported in Lebanese media that Prime Minister Saad Hariri and Lebanon's Druze leader Walid Jumblatt had paid him to commit perjury.

In their defense, Hariri and Jumblatt denied paying for perjury, but admitted to having encouraged Siddiq to testify, believing he was sincere.

Siddiq was then arrested in France under an international arrest warrant issued by the Lebanese judiciary but was later released with Paris refusing to extradite him to Lebanon.

He was living in Paris for a while but later vanished into thin air in March 2008. The French government did not provide any explanation on the issue.

Siddiq was then traced in the UAE, where he was arrested and sentenced to six months in prison for carrying a forged Czech passport.

After being released from prison in the UAE, Siddiq told reporters that he received his passport from the office of French President Nicolas Sarkozy to escape Lebanese justice.

Hariri was Lebanon's most prominent politician since the end of the 1975-1990 civil war. He was killed in a massive truck bombing that set off a spiral of political turmoil in Lebanon.


River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian