Uprooted Palestinians are at the heart of the conflict in the M.E Palestinians uprooted by force of arms. Yet faced immense difficulties have survived, kept alive their history and culture, passed keys of family homes in occupied Palestine from one generation to the next.
A letter from the heart of a Muslim woman to the American peoplewho support Israel and its wars
Dear friends
I am writing this letter to you because of the devastation that is caused by your government in our lands, and because of the immanent threat to world peace that I see your government pushing for, again.
The way things are moving now, I foresee great danger, and terrible risk to peace and security to the whole world.
I am writing to you because I care very much about humanity and I love our planet, with all its inhabitants.
I am writing to you because I believe in civilised dialogues, where people can express themselves freely, without being patronized, silenced, ridiculed, imprisoned or even killed for their beliefs.
I am writing to you to build bridges not walls, and to take you on a short journey so you may see things from our perspective.
I am writing to you for the purpose of advancing more realistic and humanistic understanding and for trying together to achieve a more tolerant and peaceful world.
I see systematic efforts by most of your media pundits, to work endlessly at dehumanizing Muslims and their faith, and I see that as pre-emptive justification for more military attacks against more innocent civilians, aiming at our total destruction.
When a group of people (Muslims in this case) are seen as intrinsically evil, and when their faith and beliefs are portrayed as violent, malicious, and aggressive, then, anything done to those people is acceptable and defensible.
Without talking to one another, and without trying sincerely to put extra effort to understand the other, we will all be losers, and we’ll be driving our beautiful world towards catastrophe and devastation… that breaks my heart, as a mother, and as a human being.
Is it too much to ask “to open our hearts and our minds and listen to what the other has to say” ?
Can we learn something from little children; where prejudice and bigotry are non-existent ?
Words in your media are used and manipulated to imply deceptive meanings, so you are kept in a state of constant fear, watching over your shoulders in panic from "Islamist monsters bent on invading and destroying you", never mind how absurd and ridiculous such allegations in reality are.
The zionist-controlled media has hijacked our language, and vocabulary and disfigured our religion
They drilled in people’s heads that:
Islam is terror
Jihad is holy war
Fatwa is death penalty
Muslim women are the manifestation of oppression, uneducated, forced into wearing the veil, and enslaved by their men.
Muslim men are fanatics, cruel, sadistic wife beaters
Muslim children are terrorists in the making
When a c rime is committed, the criminal is a criminal, but when a Muslim commits a crime, even a petty one, he is immediately labelled a "Muslim criminal" irrespective the fact that his faith opposes such crimes. A Muslim criminal committing a crime becomes "a Muslim terrorist", and he committed the crime because he is a Muslim and his faith teaches evil!
If only Americans could understand that what is published in US medias and blogs, is not the truth, but as much a lie as when your bankers all told you could borrow almost limitless and never suffer any economic consequences.
The hard facts about Islam and Muslims, are different, and the vast majority of Muslims would not fit to this ugly stereotype.
Islamis peace: the root of the word Islam is Salam, which is one of the Holy Names of God. Salam is Arabic for Peace. The meaning of the word Islam is beautiful as Islam is Arabic for bring into Peace.
The word Salam is used for greeting others. Saying "as'Salam alaikum" to someone means "Peace be upon you!"
When a Muslim greets another person with "Peace be upon you," the greeter is in fact proclaiming a contract of Peace with the other person. Hence, if the greeter has non-peaceful intentions towards the other person, he would be engaging in hypocrisy, which is one of the Major Sins in Islam!
“When a (courteous) greeting is offered you, meet it with a greeting still more courteous, or (at least) of equal courtesy. God takes careful account of all things” Quran (4:86)
Jihadis an Arabic word that means the endeavour to do your best to make this world a better one:
Any effort to help achieve that is called jihad, or struggle, going to school to learn is a form of jihad, being a mother rearing children is jihad, spreading knowledge through teaching or writing is jihad, treating patients is jihad, looking after sick parents is jihad, also defending yourself when attacked is jihad, and struggling against oppression is jihad.
Any action that one undertakes in order to bring good to mankind is jihad
Life with all its ups and downs is a jihad
The highest form of Jihad, however, is the inner Jihad, which is the Major Jihad that means the never ending inner struggle against one’s arrogance, greed, and selfishness in order to achieve the Generous Temperaments.
Contrary to common beliefs, the concept of holy war does NOT exist in Islam; it is a European concept from the days of the crusaders, and has absolutely no equivalent in Islam, it does however in the minds of the new crusaders as it seems from so many video clip we have seen, of your hypocrite politicians and zionist "evangelists", and in the sick minds of those who invaded our lands and murdered our people.
To translate the concept of Holy War into arabic is almost impossible. It would sound something like “Harb Muqaddassah” which does not exist in arabic, even the concept of it is unheard of, never used in spoken or written language, as it is too contrary to Islamic principles and values !
The Prophet Muhammad, Peace be upon him, declared "Verily I was sent to this World to define (and live by) the Generous Temperament."
- Show quoted text -
According to him, the codes of Generous Temperament (makarem elakhlaq) are seven:
“Pardoning those who have oppressed you
Giving to those who have deprived you
Connecting with those who have shunned you
Benefiting those who have abused you
Counselling those who have deceived you
Forgiving those who have maligned you
Forbearing with those who have angered you.”
How misleading and dishonest is the translation and misconception of jihad as a holy war then!
By writing this, all I am doing is reclaiming my language back.
Fatwais nothing but an expression of an opinion by an informed person:
Being what it is, it is not for any one to enforce their “fatwa” / opinion upon anyone.
There is no hierarchy system, no priesthood, no church institution, and no clergy in Islam; and that is something totally misunderstood, and rarely ever mentioned.
Any Muslim is entitled to make his/ her opinion from their understanding of the Qur’anic text.
If those opinions are expressed by some knowledgeable person, they are called “fatwa”.
All this falsification, distortion, and misrepresentation of Islam (deliberate or not) if not addressed and sorted out urgently, logically and with open-mindedness and compassion, then our world is doomed!
Being a Muslim woman and knowing exactly what Islam teaches, I feel dismayed and heartbroken at the image that you are made to believe as a true representation of us and of our faith
Now, if I come to you and say: “well, no in fact Islam teach this or does not teach that” would you take my word for it?
Of course not, so, I “quote” some of the specific teachings in order to reflect-precisely- the position of Islam, from the most authentic source to Muslims: the Qur’an.
Democracy and Freedom of choice:
“No compulsion in religion or ideology” (2:256).
“Say: O you that reject Faith! I worship not that which you worship, and you do not worship that which I worship... To you be your Way, and to me mine”. (109:1-6)
“We showed him the Way: whether he be grateful or ungrateful (rests on his will)”. (76:3)
“Let there arise out of you a band of people inviting to all that is good, enjoining what is right, and forbidding what is wrong: They are the ones to attain felicity”. (3:104)
"And their affairs are (conducted) through consultation among themselves." (42:38)
“If any one does a righteous deed, it ensures to the benefit of his own soul; if he does evil, it works against (his own soul). In the end will you (all) be brought back to your Lord”. (45; 15)
Relations with others:
'O mankind! We created you from a single soul, male and female, and made you into nations and tribes, so that you may come to know one another. Truly, the most honoured of you in God’s sight is the greatest of you in righteousness. God is All-Knowing, All-Aware'. (49.13)
“(All) people are a single nation.” (II:213)
“And among His Signs is the creation of the heavens and the earth, and the variations in your languages and your colours: verily in that are Signs for those who know”.(30-22)
Women’s’ issues
“Whoever works righteousness, man or woman, and has Faith, verily, to him will We give a new Life, a life that is good and pure and We will bestow on such their reward according to the best of their actions”. (16-97)
“The Believers, men and women, are protectors one of another: they enjoin what is just, and forbid what is evil: they observe regular prayers, practise regular charity, and obey God and His Messenger. On them will God pour His mercy: for God is Exalted in power, Wise”. (9:71)
“If any do deeds of righteousness, be they male or female - and have faith, they will enter Heaven, and not the least injustice will be done to them”. (3-124)
“Then shall anyone who has done an atom's weight of good, see it! And anyone who has done an atom's weight of evil, shall see it”. (99:7-8)
“It is He who created you from a single soul, and made its mate of like nature, in order that he might dwell with her (in love)”. (7:189)
“And among His Signs is this: He created for you mates from among yourselves that ye may dwell in tranquillity with them, and He plants love and mercy between your (hearts): verily in that are Signs for those who reflect. 30-21
“For Muslim men and women, for believing men and women, for devout men and women, for truthful men and women, for men and women who are patient and constant, for men and women who humble themselves, for men and women who give in Charity, for men and women who fast (and deny themselves), for men and women who guard their chastity, and for men and women who engage much in God’s praise; for them has God prepared forgiveness and great reward”. (33:35)
War and peace:
The general rule is:
Fighting is only allowed in case of self-defence, against Aggression (odwan) or Persecution (fitnah).
'You may fight in the cause of God against those who fight you, but do not initiate aggression. God does not love transgressors.' (2.190)
"O believers, be you guardians of justice, witness for God. Let not a group's hostility to you cause you to deviate from justice; be equitable - that is nearer to being God-conscious." (5:8)
“To those against whom war is made, permission is given (to fight back), because they are wronged; and verily, God is most powerful for their aid; (They are) those who have been expelled from their homes in defiance of right,-(for no cause) except that they say, our Lord is God”. (22:39-40)
“God commands justice, the doing of good, and liberality to kith and kin, and He forbids all shameful deeds, and injustice and antagonism: He advices you, that ye may be reminded.” (16-90)
"No soul shall be made to bear the burden (liability) of another." (35:18)
“But show them forgiveness, and say "Peace!" and soon shall they know!” (43; 89)
“The recompense for an injury is an injury equal thereto (in degree): but if a person forgives and makes reconciliation, his reward is due from God; for (God) loveth not those who are wrong-doers”. (42:40)
'If they seek peace, then seek you peace. And trust in God for He is the One that heareth and knoweth all things.' (8.61)
“But God does call to the Home of Peace” (10-25)
“Ye who believe! Stand out firmly for justice, as witnesses to God, even as against yourselves, or your parents, or your kin, and whether it be (against) rich or poor: for God can best protect both. Follow not the desires (of your hearts), lest ye swerve, and if ye distort (justice) or decline to do justice, verily God is well-acquainted with all that ye do. Thus, have We made of you a nation justly balanced, that ye might be witnesses over the nations, and the Messenger a witness over yourselves” (2-143)
“Show forgiveness, speak for justice and avoid the ignorant.” (7:199)
“It may well be that God will bring about love (and friendship) between you and those with whom you are now at odds.” (60:7)
“Nor can goodness and evil be equal. Repel evil with what is best: if you do so, he who is your enemy will become a close friend.” (41.34)
**********************
I am only a mother, and I am also a person who detests violence, war, weapons, killings…etc
I am sick to death with war and violence
And I wish what I have seen and what my people had seen on nobody.
Centuries of imperialism, and illiteracy followed by the brutal uprooting of a whole nation from their homeland in order to give it away to people from other parts of the world just because of their Jewish-ness, and to free the European’s mind of the guilt of the holocaust (which we –Muslims and Palestinians- had nothing to do with, but ended up having to pay the price for Europe’s crimes)
Year after year, decade after decade of injustice towards the Palestinians, accompanied by unequivocal support from USA and Europe to the Zionist entity, led the Muslims to resent the hypocritical policies of the Western world.
This blind support of the Zionists was/ is perceived by Muslims as an act of aggression and grave injustice.
Yet those fundamental basic facts are not represented to you, what you led to believe is that Muslims hate your freedom, your democracy, they are jealous of your way of life, and they hate peace… what a load of nonsense!!!
Muslims feel oppressed and persecuted by YOUR government, its unjust policies, its unconditional support of the terrorist zionist regime and its criminal wars and aggression
They feel that justice had been denied to them, and that they have been constantly under attack.
Exposed to so much injustice and oppression it is only natural that people would have resentments and would look for ways to liberate themselves from oppression and modern slavery, which is precisely the case in many Muslim countries nowadays.
And instead of trying to right the wrongs you’ve done over decades of oppression and injustice, what do you do?
You go yet again and attack more Muslim countries; you bomb Afghanistanand Iraqreducing them to rubble! And go on to threaten Iran with nukes!
You kill over a million more!
And what is more ridiculous is that you are doing so whilst claiming that you’re doing it for the sake of liberating us from our backwardness, ignorance, and our fanatics…
What are you thinking? Do you think we are idiots?
We are sick to death with your interference in our lands, and our countries
We are sick to death with your domination and your attitude of superiority towards us and the rest of the world.
We are sick to death of you trying to impose on us your ways, your thinking, your problems and your solutions.
Imperialism has no room in the future of our world, and most certainly, that must include thought imperialism.
WE WANT TO BE FREE
We want to be free in our homelands
We want to be able to exercise our rights to choose our representatives and our governments
We want our human rights that enable live peacefully and with dignity with no threat of bombing or ethnic cleansing
We want our right to go home and not to live forever as refugees
We want our right to believe in God or not to believe if we so wish to
We want our right to be equal human beings with equal value to our lives
We want to be free to solve the ills of our societies in our own ways not by copy-pasting your experiences and your solutions.
It’s not good enough to try to justify the horrors that you’ve inflected and still inflecting upon us, by dehumanizing us and belittling our faith. Period
Where to go from there?
Yes indeed, where to go from there?
Is there a way out?
As an optimist, yes of course there is always a way out:
To begin with, you must start with opening your hearts and minds to see us as equal human beings, worthy of life, love, and freedom.
Remove your prejudice against us, and with sincere efforts open dialogues with us, not to tell us what should we do or how should we think, or whom to elect as our leaders, but to listen to us as your equals in humanity. A dialogue is a two way system.
It’s also good to start educating yourselves a bit more about us, not taking your information from Hollywoodbut from us and our authentic sources.
We have so much to tell you, so much to share, so much good we can offer you and the world.
And that is not exaggeration; that is simply the truth. Because we are humans just like you. We all have so much to offer the world.
May I give some suggestion towards a solution?
Why not end your occupation of our lands?
Why not stop supporting those puppet regime and dictators your successive governments have forces upon Arabs for the sake of "Nation Building" which is the most heinous word one can imagine, and why not continuing by accepting our FREELY elected representatives, whom we chose through democracy ?
Why not visit and even come and live in Muslim countries without your army uniform, and without offering your bombs and missiles as gifts?
Why not come to us walking with open arms rather than coming carrying machine guns and riding offensive tanks?
Instead of pushing like crazy towards Armageddon; why not gently, lovingly, tenderly and with compassion, why not embrace a world of justice, tolerance and respect, as Jesus “peace be upon him” would’ve done if he was alive today?
Why not attentively listen to each other? Why not dream and work for a more peaceful world built upon diversity and richness of multiplicity, a world where humanity is celebrated and variety is rejoiced, a world where all are respected, where all are free to think, to believe, and to live their own way without infringing on each other, or imposing our ways upon each other?
As of now, the world already can see that the American dream is a nightmare, your s-elected and corrupt governments have made your country the most loathed country, and they have robbed you exactly as they robbed those "Arabs out there"
If you look more vigilantly, more attentively, and closer to home, you will find the REAL terrorist worthy of your alarm and disgust, are the ones amongst your midst, ruling your country, robbing your resources, thriving on your poverty, rejoicing your misery.
So why not transform this mad nightmare and ideologically driven devastation, back into a dream…. a reality?
At the First Zionist Congress which was held in 1897 in Basel, Switzerland, one of the goals set was to create a Jewish state in the land of Palestine. At that time, only a few Jews were living in Palestine and they were nearly all native Sephardic Jews who are blood-related to the Arabs. These Palestinian (Sephardic) Jews and the Palestinian Arabs were living in peace as they had for centuries.
After the Zionist Congress in 1897, European Ashkenazi Jews began migrating to Palestine and buying land wherever they could. Yet, by 1920 Jews owed only 2% of Palestine.
By 1948 when Israel declared itself a state, these invading Jews had increased their land ownership; but, it was still less than 6%.
To accommodate the increasing European Jewish migration, the Jews needed more lands but the Palestinian Arabs refused to sell. So, to get more land from the Palestinians, these communist oriented European (Ashkenazi) Jews resorted to the one thing at which they are adept — TERRORISM.
Their first major act of terrorism against the Palestinians was at the Palestinian village of Deir Yassin. During the night of April 9, 1948, two Zionist terrorist gangs, the Irgun and the Stem Gang attacked and massacred over 250 men, women and children.
Menachem Begin, leader of the attack on Deir Yassin and later Prime Minister of Israel, has this to say, "The massacre was not only justified, but there would not have been a state of Israel without the 'victory' at Deir Yassin'.
The massacre at Deir Yassin caused other Palestinians to flee their homes in fear. Zionist terrorists drove trucks with loudspeakers through the streets and over the roads of Palestine warning Palestinians that what happened at Dear Yassin would happen to them if they didn't leave.
These Zionist terrorists weren't bluffing: For Example:
They killed 60 Palestinians at Balad Esh Sheikh.
They blew up 20 homes in Sa'sa, killing 60 women and children.
They killed a number of women who were working in Saint Simon monastery in Jerusalem.
They massacred 250 at Lydda.
They killed 200, mostly old people, in the village mosque in Ed-Dawayimeh.
They killed 51 workers as they returned from their fields at Kafr Qasem.
Christian inhabitants of Kaba Bir'im were expelled from the village and the village destroyed. The village cemetery was desecrated, including the smashing of 73 crosses.
During the few months when these and other acts of terrorism were taking place, 300.000 Palestinian Christians and Moslems were forced to leave their homes or be killed by the terrorist groups which were made up of European, communist oriented Jews. It was these same Marxist oriented Jews who were soon to became the ruling elite of the State of Israel. From the beginning, and to the present, these terrorist Marxist oriented Zionists have ruled Israel.
After Israel declared itself a state on May 14, 1948, Israeli terrorism continued in an effort to push more Palestinians from their homes.
Since 1948, 350 Christian churches and Moslem mosques have been destroyed by these Zionist terrorists.
".... Israel regards Egypt as an important partner, and their strategic and security cooperation is at its highest in years. Nevertheless, there are also points of tension, especially stemming from Israeli perceptions of Egyptian public opinion.
In the absence of full 'normalisation' in Israeli-Egyptian relations, Israel has become accustomed to a minimalistic interpretation of peace. Acknowledging limits on relations, it makes the most of military cooperation and a certain level of strategic partnership.
..... Israel regards Cairo's role as important and complementary to its own interests, since both states share security interests vis-a-vis the Gaza strip and regional stability; and Egypt maintains significant, if declining, regional influence. ..... Israel considers Cairo's influence on Hamas to have declined ...to Israel's benefit: during its December 2008-January 2009 offensive in Gaza, Egypt stood against Hamas, and it is currently building a wall along its border with Gaza. These policies provoke domestic dissent, but pro-Gaza Egyptian activism faces zero-tolerance security measures....
Israeli-Egyptian security cooperation includes information sharing and border control, particularly concerning smuggling of weapons, people and dual-use goods that may be used to manufacture arms. There is a joint military committee that meets regularly, although urgent issues, such as Israel-Hamas negotiations, are dealt with cooperatively by the highest political and security figures.
Despite some disillusionment with Hamas, the Egyptian public maintains a strong sense of solidarity with the Palestinians as a whole. Israel has become used to state policies and social trends influenced by this:
Individuals who wish to visit Israel must attend security investigations before and after travelling.
Hala Mustafa, a political analyst at state daily al-Ahram, was publicly chastised after the Israeli ambassador visited her office in September. Other journalists have been criticised, or even banned from writing, for researching in Israel or with Israelis.
The actor, Amr Waked, was threatened with boycott in September after working with an Israeli actor in a UK television production, and Ahmed Abdalla, director of the Egyptian film 'Heliopolis', boycotted the Toronto International Film Festival last year in protest against its inclusion of Israeli films. In March, a film festival at Cairo's French Cultural Centre was pressured to remove an Israeli film from its schedule.
Professional syndicates threaten to revoke the licences of members who have any contact with Israelis.
However, the MB has faced a harsh crackdown in recent months in the run-up to parliamentary elections in June and November. Approximately 5,000 are in administrative detention. Senior members are unable to leave the country and are closely monitored. In light of this control, the 'Islamisation' of Egyptian society at present poses little threat to Israel. However, Israeli leaders view these developments as potential long-term security concerns. Israel perceives Egypt's public as largely unconcerned with Iran's rising influence. However, tension in state-level Egyptian-Iranian relations is reassuring for Israel, which sees Cairo as key to balancing Iran's power, and a partner in challenging what it sees as a 'radical' axis comprising Iran, Syria and Hizbollah. Though there is no joint policy towards Iran, bilateral meetings stress the shared importance of the Iranian issue. ........ Although Egypt is wary of Iran's ambitions, it is keen to use the issue to pressure Israel on its own nuclear programme, and will reiterate its call for a region free of nuclear weapons at the UN NPT conference beginning today.
Given state-level security cooperation and anti-Israeli public sentiment in Egypt, Israel places great importance on continuity when the next president takes power. The two most likely candidates, Mubarak's son, Gamal, or military chief Omar Suleiman, represent for Israel a continuation of the current establishment...."
Israel has viewed with caution the apparent 'Islamisation' of Egyptian society .....
NEW YORK -- One of the fascinating aspects of recent tensions between the American and Israeli governments over Washington’s Middle Eastern diplomacy has been a sea-change in the public posture of what is usually called “the Israeli lobby” in the United States. This phrase refers to a very sophisticated, extensive and successful web of American organizations and individuals working to shape American foreign policy so that it favors the prevalent Israeli rather than Arab view of things.
The pro-Israel lobby includes mainstream American Jewish groups but also fundamentalist Christian organizations. They have been able since the 1970s to shape the main contours of Washington’s policy in the region on anything that touches or approaches Israeli concerns, by using perfectly legal and routine levers of political influence in the United States that target the political class and public opinion:
1.The most important is using immense local and national pressures (funding and votes) on members of Congress and the president to keep them in line with pro-Israeli sentiments, or else risk losing the next election. (Therefore Congress routinely, as it did in recent weeks, issues letters signed by a large majority of its members declaring strong support for whatever Israel asks them to support.)
2. This is complemented by persistent and professional activities that seek to shape the public environment primarily through influencing the mass media, including portraying Israel as a consistent strategic ally of the United States while the Arabs, Iranians and selected others are portrayed as dangerous to both Israel’s survival and American values. This includes activities by dozens of pro-Israeli groups that give the appearance of being independent American organizations, but are seen by many to work primarily to promote pro-Israeli sentiments, policies and interests: Campus Watch, CAMERA, MEMRI, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP), American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and others.
The significant recent development is that these and other such groups have been pulled out of the world of the shadows where their pro-Israeli agenda has always found comfortable and successful camouflage, and they are now routinely discussed in public in two main contexts: Are they working for the best interests of the United States or Israel? Is their strong influence on American public opinion and foreign policy a good or a bad thing for the United States?
The novel public debate about the pro-Israel lobby in the United States was highlighted a few weeks ago by a fascinating exchange in Foreign Policy magazine between Professor Stephen Walt of Harvard University (co-author with John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago of The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy) and Robert Satloff, director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. They exchanged thoughts on some issues raised by Walt in response to an earlier article by an American journalist who quoted a Washington source as suggesting that long-time State Department and White House official Dennis Ross was “far more sensitive to Netanyahu’s coalition politics than to US interests.”
The Walt-Satloff exchange touched on several issues, the main one being whether WINEP was an independent American institution doing independent analysis, research and policy recommendations or whether it was an integral part of the pro-Israeli lobbying and public relations efforts. That discussion continues. (A subsequent article on mediamattersaction.org, by M J Rosenberg, offered confirmation that WINEP is and always has been a creation of the pro-Israel lobby, by recounting events he participated in when AIPAC decided to create WINEP in a manner that disguised its connections to the pro-Israeli world in Washington.)
The Walt-Satloff exchange is only the latest and most substantive of many examples of how the work of pro-Israeli groups in the United States is being forced onto the stage of public analysis and debate, with the main question being: Is the line they push good for the US national interest or only designed to help Israeli hawks? The pro-Israel lobby groups are not comfortable being assessed in this manner, especially because of the insinuations of dual loyalty or conflict-of-interest that often lurk just below the surface in some of these discussions.
But it was inevitable that this public discussion would occur once the Obama administration decided to push hard for Arab-Israeli negotiations that started to separate US national interests from Israeli national interests -- without compromising the fundamental American commitment to the survival and security of Israel within its 1967 borders. The pro-Israel lobby prefers to work quietly in the background to define the Middle East foreign policy debate in the United States, but now finds itself part of the agenda as it is being debated in public. I suspect this is because many people in power in Washington are starting to feel the pain and the consequences of the US pursuit of a decades-long, stridently pro-Israeli policy, and are exploring new approaches to securing American, Israeli and Arab legitimate national interests simultaneously.
Rami G. Khouri is Editor-at-large of The Daily Star, and Director of the Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy and International Affairs at the American University of Beirut, in Beirut, Lebanon.
“Israel” to Open Proximity Talks with Security, Water Demands Al Manar
03/05/2010 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu intends to open the indirect talks with the Palestinian Authority this week with a discussion of the security arrangements in the West Bank and of water resources. According to Ynet, the indirect talks will commence on Wednesday and Netanyahu has decided to personally head negotiations.
A senior official told Haaretz that Netanyahu had recently asked the defense establishment and the National Security Council to elaborate on the so-called eight-point brief, which lists Israel’s security demands in terms of a permanent status agreement, as framed by Ehud Olmert’s government.
The PLO executive committee is expected Monday to officially decide to renew negotiations. The Arab League on Saturday gave its green light for the talks to go ahead after the Palestinians received US assurances that the construction would be shelved, an official of the pan-Arab organization said.
Israeli diplomats believe the Palestinians will prefer to open the negotiations with discussion of the borders – an issue on which the Palestinians think they have an advantage over the Israelis, since the United States position on this matter is close to their own.
Both Israel and the Palestinian Authority agreed to the American demand to talk about the core issues of a permanent status agreement: borders, occupied Jerusalem, security, water, settlements and refugees. However, each side has its own priorities which it will choose to focus on, and with which it will prefer to begin negotiations.
Netanyahu arrived in Sharm el-Sheikh this morning to confer with Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak on the upcoming negotiations. Netanyahu went straight into talks with Mubarak after arriving in Egypt’s Red Sea resort. He was accompanied by the chairman of the National Security Committee, Uzi Arad, and Industry and Trade Minister Benjamin Ben Eliezer.
In Egypt, Netanyahu hopes to receive more guarantees for the promotion of talks with the Palestinians. He expects Mubarak to appreciate the Israeli demand for absolute security as a condition for any future agreement. He furthermore hopes that the Egyptian president will work towards shortening the duration of indirect negotiations ahead of direct talks.
Meanwhile, U.S. special envoy to the Middle East, George Mitchell, is expected to arrive to launch the negotiations; he will meet with Netanyahu on Wednesday. Mitchell is expected to hold his first meeting with PA President Mahmoud Abbas later this week.
The envoy will spend the first phase of the proximity talks shuttling between Tel Aviv and Ramallah. In Tel Aviv, he will meet primarily with attorney Yitzhak Molcho, who was involved in negotiating with Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat during Netanyahu’s first term as prime minister.
“The negotiations will be conducted in channels that are as discreet as possible and within a limited framework,” a senior government official said.
As part of his demand to expand the Olmert brief, Netanyhu has asked that it include detailed information concerning the demilitarization of any future Palestinian state and the deployment of Israeli occupation forces on its eastern border to prevent weapons smuggling.
The original document was authored by then chief of planning department at the General Staff and today commander of the Israeli Air Force, Maj.-Gen. Ido Nehoshtan. Its conditions already include Israeli monitoring of Palestinian border terminals, freedom of Israeli aviation in Palestinian airspace, Israeli control of the electromagnetic spectrum and early warning stations in the occupied West Bank. Both the Bush administration and the PA voiced reservations on the brief at the time.
While Netanyahu, unlike his predecessors Ehud Barak and Olmert, did not set up a negotiating team to run the talks per se, the PA is well prepared: Top-ranking Palestinian officials including Yasser Abed Rabbo, Saeb Erekat and Mahmoud Abbas himself have years of experience in negotiating with Israel. The Palestinians also have what they call a “negotiation support unit,” which has been operating continuously for over a decade.
On the Israeli side, by contrast, Molcho is the only close Netanyahu adviser with any experience in negotiating with the Palestinians.
Observers explain that Netanyahu’s reluctance to set up a large negotiating team stems from a fear of leaks. A source in the Israeli Prime Minister’s Office told Haaretz, however, that there has been a tremendous amount of background work done ahead of the renewal of the talks.
It remains unclear which Israeli or other commitments have convinced the Palestinians to resume even indirect negotiations.
PA secretary Taib Abdel Rahim said Sunday that on his last visit to Ramallah, Mitchell brought a letter from U.S. President Barack Obama guaranteeing an American commitment to the two-state solution and an end to the occupation that began in 1967, and a binding statement declaring that the future Palestinian state will be independent and territorially contiguous.
Abbas has informed the U.S. of his new proposals concerning construction and house demolition in occupied Jerusalem, which the Palestinians see as a provocation. The Palestinian president is set to meet with Obama in Washington later this month.
Despite Proximity Talks, 187,000 Israeli Homes Planned in Occupied Jerusalem
03/05/2010 Despite immense international pressure to halt Israeli construction in occupied east Jerusalem and in all areas over the Green Line, Israel Land Fund founder Aryeh King on Sunday presented a plan that would see nearly 200,000 new housing units created there.
Speaking at a conference at the Menachem Begin Heritage Center to discuss future development initiatives in Tel Aviv, King described a plan that would use privately owned land and property belonging to the Jewish National Fund to provide roughly 187,000 new homes in occupied Jerusalem and a chain of territory extending from Ramallah to Bethlehem.
“If Jerusalem doesn’t expand, and expand eastward, it will become the Gaza Strip,” King said.
Using a blown-up map of the city and its surrounding areas, King showed the audience where hundreds of dunams of land outside the northern Pisgat Ze’ev neighborhood could contain roughly 12,000 new housing units.
Around the southern Gilo neighborhood, King said, there is enough similar land to build 60,000 units, he said.
King’s vision faces a number of obstacles, among them the area’s large Palestinian population, who claim the territory for a future Palestinian state.
While King stressed that much of the land was “empty and unused” property, redrawing Jerusalem’s municipal boundaries to include such areas would drastically affect the occupied city’s demographics, though he didn’t seem perturbed.
“I’m ready and willing to bring 200,000 [additional] Arabs into [a wider municipal boundary of] Jerusalem,” King told the audience. “As long as there are 800,000 Jews that come with them.”
Another problem is the current freeze on Israeli housing starts in “Judea and Samaria”, and the de facto building freeze in occupied Jerusalem, which the city’s politicians have been hard-pressed to acknowledge over recent weeks.
Ever since the approval of 1,600 new housing units in Ramat Shlomo was announced during US Vice President Joe Biden’s visit in March, sparking a diplomatic row with Washington over construction even within occupied Jerusalem, all government bodies dealing with such building plans have either refrained from meeting or addressed only minor projects.
While King’s plan allows for some leeway in this area, as much of the property in question is privately owned and within the occupied Jerusalem municipal boundaries – any projects outside those boundaries and over the Green Line would need Israeli Defense Ministry approval.
“The state will eventually have to become involved,” King acknowledged on Sunday. “But the fact remains, Jerusalem must grow, and these are prime areas for it to grow into.”
A Danish modern art duo, Surrend, has gained attention over a series of posters in which Israel is wiped off the map of the Middle East.
In the posters, the territory presently named Israel has been renamed "Ramallah" by the two artists Jan Egesborg and Pia Bertelsen.
The posters sport the line "Final Solution" at the top.
Israel has reacted with fury to the artworks, which are currently on display in selected neighborhoods in Berlin, Germany.
In what appeared to be a quick attempt to please Israel, Berlin Mayor Klaus Wowereit told The Jerusalem Post that "there cannot be any doubt regarding Israel's right to exist. This form of satire is not what I like."
Shimon Samuels, head of the international department of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Paris, also expressed outrage and demanded that the artists be sued for "genocidal incitement" and "Nazi terminology."
However, Egesborg — who is of Jewish faith himself — has argued that the artworks mainly sought to remove taboos about the much-debated creation of Israel, which he termed as a "historical mistake."
"As a Jew, I always thought it was problematic that Israel was built on stolen land. The way the Israeli state treats the Palestinians today is terrible. There is no other answer but for the Jews of Israel to find a new homeland, perhaps in the USA, Germany or Denmark," Egesborg said.
On April 28, the Copenhagen Post reported that the Danish modern art duo Surrend, known for its political-satire-exhibits – has lined-up Berlin streets with poster titled ‘Final Solution’ – showing map of Middle East less Israel. Instead the Occupied Palestine under the Zionist-regime renamed as Ramallah. The poster was drawn by Jan Egesborg, who is Jewish, and his wife Pia Bertelsen.
Jan Egesborg has defended his artwork not being ‘anti-Semite’ as it doesn’t criticize Jews – but is meant to remove the taboo surrounding discussions on the establishment of the state of Israel, which he called a “historical mistake”. He added: “As a Jew, I always thought it was problematic that Israel was built on stolen land. The way the Israeli state treat Palestinians today is terrible. There is no other answer but for the Jews of Israel to find a new homeland, perhaps in the USA, Germany or Denmark”.
The Zionist entity has reacted with fury to the artworks, which are currently on display in selected neighborhood in Berlin. Shimon Samuels, head of the international department of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Paris had expressed outrage and demanded that the artists be sued for “genocidal incitement” and “Nazi terminology”.
Moshe Kantor, president of European Jewish Congress (EJC) while condemning the art – called upon the European governments “the need for the implementation of broader legislation against such hateful anti-Semitic expressions. This is another example of how the systematic delegitimisation of the State of Israel is absolutely anti-Semitic and no false cries of ‘freedom of speech’ can justify it”.
In the past, Jan Egesborg and Associates had produced anti-Muslim poster showing Ka’ba with headline “Dumb Stone”; Danish royal family being “guillotined” and insulting cartoon of Iranian President Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Russian president Putin – none of which brought condemnation from the Jewish groups.
On February 12, 2010 – Queen of Spain, Sofia, opened the 23rd. ‘Contemporary Arts Fair’, ARCO, at the Juan Carlos I Exhibition Centre. The fair displayed over 218 gallaries representing 32 different countries. 93 galleries represented the host country, Spain. Everything went well – except a sculpture “Stairway to Heaven” by Spanish artist Eugenio Merino (see below), which became part of ‘anti-Semitism’ controversary. The Israeli embassy called it as an insult to Judaism.
Ramallah – Ma'an – An Israeli military court sentenced a 16-year-old Hebron boy to three months in prison, while six others were sentenced to three years of probation and a 2,000 shekel (537 US dollars) of fines for participation in an anti-wall rally.
The sentencing, carried out at the Ofer military base and detention center near Ramallah in the West Bank on Sunday, saw the Israeli military prosecutor argue that the men and teenagers had endangered the lives of Israeli soldiers.
The Israeli court had previously refused to release Ash-Shueiyukhi on bail, though his attorney argued that the indictments against him had been falsified.
The seven on trial, including Ash-Shueiyukhi's relative, were all present at the demonstration protesting the detention of Abbas Zaki, Fatah Central Committee member, who was taken by Israeli forces during an peaceful march on Palm Sunday. The marchers were demanding access for Palestinian Christians to Jerusalem, following a total West Bank closure during the Jewish Passover.
Outrage at the detention of a dozen peaceful protesters including Zaki, international and Israeli activists, sparked demonstrations the following two days in April, which included rock throwing and a heavy military presence. Following the protests, Zaki was released from Israeli custody.
After seeing him in court on Sunday, Ash-Shueiyukhi's family said there appeared to be signs of abuse on the young man's body. His father called the sentencing of his son a "violation of international law and the rights of the child," and called on the intervention of the Red Crescent to protect the teenager.
If everything goes as expected next week, with the beginning of proximity talks, thousands of Jews will be marking 43 years since the “unification of Jerusalem.” The politicians will certainly not miss the festive opportunity to express their great love for “our united capital for all eternity.”
At that same hour, the police will continue to question municipal leaders who, while singing songs of praise to Jerusalem, lent a hand to the construction of the monstrous Holyland complex. You don’t need judges in Jerusalem to know that a serious crime was committed against the city with the Holyland. But corruption on the hill in West Jerusalem is nothing compared to the theft of land, identity rape, and the body of lies and criminal discrimination against 270,000 residents of the eastern part of the city.
Although these despicable acts have been going on in broad daylight for years, the public and the media don’t find them interesting. After all, it’s about Arabs. If not for the “unfortunate timing” of the U.S. vice-presidential visit, who would have cared about 1,600 housing units at Ramat Shlomo? Did anyone investigate why, over the opposition of the Israel Lands Administration representative, the District Planning and Building Committee rezoned the land from open space to land for construction? Who knows how many apartments the Housing and Construction Ministry built for young couples from East Jerusalem, which, according to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is no different than North Tel Aviv?
A reminder: Since 1967, Israel has expropriated 35 percent of the area of East Jerusalem (around 24 square kilometers). New Jewish neighborhoods were built on those lands, with 50,000 housing units.
Hundreds of developers and contractors (and public employees?) continue to get rich from this construction. How many neighborhoods were built during that time for Arab-Israeli residents? Zero. When was the last time the government supported the construction of 600 apartments in an Arab neighborhood? Thirty years ago. Most of the lands left in the hands of Palestinians (about 45 square kilometers) have been declared “green areas.” Lacking a comprehensive master plan for Jerusalem because of intentional political foot-dragging, building permits cannot be issued for areas outside the densely built-up Palestinian neighborhoods.
And after all that, people on the right dare to complain that Arabs are building without permits, while attempts are being made to “expel” Jews from Beit Yonatan, a large building without a permit that their friends stuck like a bone in the throat of a Palestinian neighborhood. The prime minister is also peddling the line that “a Palestinian from East Jerusalem can build anywhere in the city.” It’s hard to believe that Netanyahu, who was born in Jerusalem, doesn’t know that only Israeli citizens or those entitled to Israeli citizenship through the Law of Return have access to ILA property (93 percent of the land in Israel).
Not only are Arabs from East Jerusalem not allowed to buy the homes in Talbiyeh (whose name has been officially changed to Komemiyut) where they were born 63 years ago; the law doesn’t permit them to build a home on one-third of the land of East Jerusalem – the area that was expropriated from Palestinians after 1967. In contrast, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Elie Wiesel, who demanded that U.S. President Barack Obama leave Jerusalem alone, is welcome to purchase a vacation apartment in the new Jewish housing project in Sheikh Jarrah.
While children in West Jerusalem schools are celebrating “Jerusalem Day,” thousands of children in East Jerusalem will stay home or crowd into rickety schoolrooms. The education minister and the mayor, who will praise the “unification of Jerusalem,” are among those continually defaulting on the pledge to the High Court of Justice to build some 250 of the more than 1,000 classrooms that are lacking in the city.
And people who disregard Israel’s High Court will have no trouble ignoring agreements with foreigners. Who remembers that according to phase one of the road map that the Israeli government was to reopen the Palestinian Chamber of Commerce and other shuttered Palestinian institutions in East Jerusalem, pledging that they would operate based on previous agreements?
“For Zion’s sake will I not hold My peace, and for Jerusalem’s sake I will not rest, until her triumph go forth as brightness, and her salvation as a torch that burneth, and the nations shall see thy triumph, and all kings thy glory,” wrote the prophet Isaiah. It’s hard to believe that proximity talks will bring peace into closer proximity between Israel and the Palestinians. But if they help replace baseless, sickly sweet declarations with just a little more justice and wisdom emanating from Jerusalem, as the prophet envisioned, that will be enough.
Who would have believed it? Only days after a warning of an Israeli “false flag” bombing against the US “in the works” a massive car bomb is discovered in Time Square! Better yet, though no intelligence organization in the world could discover anyone claiming responsibility for this embarrassing failure, SITE Intelligence, a group rumored as the “voice of the Mossad” has placed the blame on the Pakistani Taliban.
This is the same group that has come up with numerous bin Laden “audio” tapes, seemingly, though tiny and nearly totally unstaffed, whenever it is convenient for Israel to point a finger at someone, magically Site Intelligence, run by former IDF soldier Rita Katz, whose father was executed as a spy by Saddam Hussein, makes another “unbelievable” intelligence find.
Site Intelligence finds are not only timely for Israel, when the world is focused on claims they have been planning a ‘dirty bomb’ attack to send the US to war against Iran, but always tend to support mysterious organizations run from the caves of the Afghanistan/Pakistan border region.
SMOKING GUN?
After the demise of Iraq, victim of falsified intelligence, no eliminated as an Israeli competitor, all eyes turned to Pakistan, Islam’s only nuclear state. To establish footholds to destabilize Pakistan, a pro-Indian/Israeli government under President Karzai was installed in Kabul.
After 9 years, no evidence of any terrorist activity involved in 9/11 has been found in Afghanistan. The great “net” meant to catch Osama bin Laden and armies of Al Qaeda terrorists came up empty. Instead, we are told from reliable sources that Arab nations friendly to the US released criminals, transporting them to Afghanistan.
These “foreign fighters” actually little more than “extras” in a massive global theatre, kept the small US forces engaged for years, all without any purpose other than to establish that a terrorist organization must have been in Afghanistan because there certainly was one after 2002.
SURROGATE WARFARE ON PAKISTAN
In addition to installing a government that would work directly with Israel and India to organize terrorist attacks on Pakistan, funding to destabilize the oil and gas rich republics of the former Soviet Union had to be raised.
Opium production under the Taliban had been eliminated. The new government quickly began a resurgence of opium production and heroin processing. Aided by agents of the Indian RAW and Israeli Mossad, the governments of Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan quickly fell under the influence of the 65 billion dollar a year Afghanistan drug empire.
Though the drugs may have been from Afghanistan, multiple intelligence agencies from Israel, India, Turkey and others, aided by military contracting firms contracted to the CIA, carried this plan forward.
Continual news stories tying Pakistan to failures to suppress terrorism or rumoring involvement in terrorism themselves flowed onto the world scene through western mainstream media, providing a clear footprint of a classic Mossad operation.
NO SO “UNEXPECTED”
With the demise of Al Qaeda, an unnamed Taliban organization with a website only visible to one person on earth has now declared a mysterious and shadowy war against the United States, in New York City, a city under tight security but one with a very large Israeli/Mossad presence.
This was the same city where the “dancing Israeli’s,” celebrated 9/11 after filming the attacks. Their advance knowledge of the attacks has been one of the many puzzle pieces tying Israel to 9/11.
However, it wasn’t until the “crotch bomber” of last Christmas that the breadth of Israel’s penetration of US security was demonstrated with Abdulmohammed’s attack tying directly to Tel Aviv.
Anyone who visits New York is aware that security there, especially in Time Square is the highest of anywhere in the world. The intelligence organizations protecting New York, including the world’s best police force, leave only one organization as capable of this kind of effort, an organization with massive resources in the area, numerous Israeli/American assets and many residual relationships with Gulliani/Kerik/Bush era friends, friends conveniently “asleep at the switch” on 9/11.
TIMING
Recent intelligence leaks from several agencies have warned of an impending “9/11 style” attack on a high value target in the US and Israel. Reports that a conventional bomb enhanced with nuclear material would be used.
With Iranian president Ahmandinejad and Secretary of State Clinton both scheduled to be in New York in the next 24 hours, and recent stories out of Israel trying to tie Iran to the Taliban, the issue of “timing” is a critical one.
ISREAL TIES TO PAKISTAN TALIBAN WELL ESTABLISHED
The group blamed in the Site Intelligence/Israeli report, the Pakistani Taliban has been responsible for hundreds of attacks in Pakistan, killing thousands of citizens. However, reliable sources have tied this group directly to Mossad/RAW training camps inside Afghanistan and Balochistan. The Pakistani Taliban have long been allies of Israel and India with 2000 terrorist trainers inside Afghanistan arming Pakistani Taliban terrorist group.
This has been confirmed, not only in direct briefings with the Pakistani ISPR and ISI but US military intelligence sources as well, who dispute the number of terrorist trainers, not their presence.
Terrorist groups inside Balochistan, the remote Pakistan province said to be a haven for Mossad attacks against Iran, claim to be headquartered in Israel. These groups work directly with the Pakistan Taliban and are another indication of this current “stunt” turning back on non-Islamic planners.
ALWAYS THE SAME, “WHO GAINS?”
With Iran taking the propaganda offensive to the United States, a nation increasingly distancing itself from, not only the idea of supporting an Israeli attack on Iran, Israel is under pressure to reestablish itself as America’s partner in a long discredited “war on terror” that has been a huge embarrassment to the US.
With over 90% of America’s terror arrests turning out to be innocent bystanders, some tortured for years, untold numbers “disappeared,” Bush era failures have soured public support for hunting terrorist leaders who have increasingly been either captured by Pakistan or have been found to be negotiating with US forces.
With the signature of this bombing being so close to that of the “crotch bombing,” an attack with Israeli fingerprints from Nigeria to Yemen to Amsterdam, the “superfast” accusation against a Pakistani group was no surprise.
With New York police discounting the Pakistan connection to the bombing immediately, Fox News has unleashed an attack on the Obama administration in a well orchestrated manner, accusing democrats of “failing to protect the American people.”
With both Site Intelligence and Fox News tied directly to Israel and the signature and timing of this attack showing clear Israeli fingerprints, Fox may be right.
America may be unable to protect itself from a nation still seen by most Americans as a close ally. No other nation has the capability of such an attack or the influence to orchestrate the news, an act already in motion.
If any finger is pointing anywhere, Fox News is telling us “Israel did it.”
"... The Taliban in Pakistan said it planted the crude device made of propane, gasoline and fireworks to avenge the killing in April of al Qaeda's two top leaders in Iraq as well as U.S. interference in Muslim countries. But New York Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said there was "no evidence" to support the Taliban's claim and no way of knowing right now whether there were links to Islamist groups or to a domestic cause in the United States..."
Chinese president Hu Jintao was taken by surprise by the Chairman of the Palestinian Authority Mahmoud Abbas's plea to support tough sanctions against Iran's nuclear program when they met in Shanghai Saturday, May 1, debkafile's Middle East sources reveal. He was even more taken aback by the argument that a Middle East war, a realistic peril in the absence of sanctions, would cost the lives of many Palestinians who would find themselves caught between the belligerents.
Hu received the Palestinian leader after the gala opening of Shanghai World Expo. According to Chinese sources, Abbas explained that for once, most Arab nations - and the Palestinians, most of all - are ranged on the same side as Israel and the West in their profound anxiety about Iran's nuclear program and the threat it poses of regional violence.
Abbas told the Chinese leader that he spoke on behalf of a majority of Arab rulers, in particular, Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak, United Arab Emirates president Sheikh Khalifa bin Zaed al-Nahyan and King Abdullah II of Jordan.
Palestinian cities have no defenses against their rockets should Iran and its allies, Syria, Hizballah and Hamas wage war against Israel, he said, and thousands of Palestinians in the line of fire would pay with their lives. He therefore pleaded with President Hu to drop his objections to harsh sanctions against Iran at the UN Security Council as the only way to avert a conflict that could spark a Middle East conflagration.
Our sources note that this was the first time a Palestinian leader supported Israel's position on any Middle East issue, undertaking a mission to China in which several Israeli officials failed earlier this year.
The Chinese leader's response is not known. However, one of Beijing's main considerations in opposing painful sanctions against Iran, including an embargo on refined fuel products and arms, is its championship of the Third World nations' position that Security Council sanctions are a blunt instrument all too often applied by the big powers, especially United States, to bend them to their will.
Abbas' petition, in fact, complemented and underscored the Obama administration's case for harsh sanctions against Iran, in terms of economic benefit. Beijing need not fear repercussions from Tehran in terms of its oil supplies, US officials have told Beijing, since Saudi Arabia would be willing to make up any shortfall - and at cheaper prices, to boot.
Abbas' arguments to Hu reinforced that pledge.
Saturday, too, the Arab League's monitoring committee was expected to endorse the Palestinian leader's acceptance of the US plan for launching indirect peace negotiations with Israel. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton also voiced confidence Friday, April 30, that proximity talks would begin next week. Next Monday, Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu meets Mubarak in Sharm el-Sheikh, before the return to the region of the American Middle East envoy, George Mitchell later in the week.
Nouvelles du front ukrainien, par Thierry Meyssan
-
Les États-Unis et la Russie veulent conclure la paix le plus vite possible
en Ukraine. Le problème n'est pas où l'on croit : il semble que les
straussiens ...
The man bankrupting America
-
“Go F*** Yourself, Scott: A Full Background Check on The Man Bankrupting
America, Human Skin Tag, Scott Bessent.“ (Blundell).In the same week,
different US...
Occult Utopia Of Jewish Golden Age
-
Occult Utopia Of Jewish Golden Age September 6 2026
___________________________________ More Vids! +BN Vids Archive! HERE!
________________________________...
And You Remain Impossible to Erase
-
There you are, the inspiring Imam, forever present in the conscience of the
honorable and the hearts of the loyal.
Father Dave Smith, Pray For (Mufti) Dr. Hassoun
-
Abducted by the terrorist regime in Syria in 2025, Sheikh Hassoun has been
sentenced to life in prison I spoke with Father Dave Smith, an Australian
Anglic...
Report on Beth Israel vigil 08-15-26
-
*Charlie Kirk and JFK*
John F. Kennedy was assassinated under questionable circumstances on
November 22, 1963, and Charlie Kirk fell on September 10 of la...
On The Road To International Anarchy
-
ON THE ROAD TO INTERNATIONAL ANARCHY— An Analysis (14 August 2026) by
Lawrence Davidson Part I — The Turn Toward […]
-
Hello all,
It is with great sadness that I share with you the passing of our beloved
sister, Mother, and Grandmother, the individual that you all knew ...
Best Horror Podcast
-
Best Horror Podcast Introduction: Horror podcasts […]
The post Best Horror Podcast appeared first on Copper Shock Horror Podcast.
Ikhras Endorses Muntadhar Al-Zaidi
-
“Oh parties of banditry and sectarianism and corruption, we have come and
our goal is to destroy you.” Ikhras formally endorses Muntadhar al-Zaidi,
Iraqi j...
Prince Charles: Foreign Jews behind bloodshed in ME
-
In May, 2017, British Crown Prince Charles declined an invitation from
Zionist entity’s president Reuven Rivlin‘s to attend the 100th anniversary
of the no...
Palestinian Women – One for All, All for One
-
Honouring All Palestinian Women by Honouring Three: Hanin Zoabi, Ahed
Tamimi, Samah Sabawi Vacy Vlazna “Palestinian women have always stood side
by side ...
US’s Saudi Oil Deal from Win-Win to Mega-Lose
-
By F. William Engdahl Who would’ve thought it would come to this? Certainly
not the Obama Administration, and their brilliant geo-political think-tank
neo-...
-
*Mordechai Vanunu wins human rights prize of Brazilian Press Association *
* http://www.alternativenews.org/english/index.php/features/updates/7038-mordechai...
Abdul Aziz Rantissi:
"My ultimate wish, my God, is to attain martyrdom,"...God granted him his wish on April 17, 2004, at the hands of Israeli assassins.