Sunday, 20 November 2011

Standoff In Egypt's Tahrir Square

Via Free Thought Manifesto

Listen to this article. Powered by Odiogo.com

Submitted by "Sayf Maslul"


Bodies of dead Egyptian protesters stockpiled like garbage. Welcome to SCAF's deMOCKracy

Egypt Riot Cops Fire Tear Gas, Rubber Bullets:



The below video show a member of Egypt's Central Security Force dragging the body of a dead protester to an area where other bodies are stockpiled like garbage.



West Supplying Army Regime With Means Of Oppression:



Standoff In Egypt's Tahrir Square:



River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Cartoon Of The Day

Friday, November 18, 2011 at 3:39PM

Gilad Atzmon

Cartoon by Enzo Apicella

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

PA must end security coordination with Israel now to withstand Israeli bullying and blackmail.

In his previous comments.
  • Mr. Amayereh thought "the Palestinian Authority (PA) decision to move against Muhammed Dahlan, the perpetual trouble-maker, will erase a major cause of the collision between Hamas and Fatah."
  • Cosequentely he "thought that the Dayton era was well behind us." and Abbas will be remembered as a "a sincere man who tried but failed to make peace with Israel, even at a terrible price, namely giving up more than 78% of historical Palestine".
  • Shocked with Abbas Disgraceful behavior, Mr. Amayereh, after "de facto alliance" and "Mass axis", invented another new term. He wrote: "Israel, U.S. , want Abbas to be full-fledged traitor"
Here, Mr. Amayereh, is calling PA to stop the "de facto alliance" with Israel "to withstand Israeli bullying and blackmail",
Moreover, the PA, not his Eygpt's Brother's, "ought to press the new rulers of Egypt to make the Egyptian commitment to honor and uphold the Israeli-Egyptian peace treaty subject to Israeli treatment of the Palestinian people."

Stay tuned, after the Egypt's Brothers friday's march, the nazi-like Israel shall release all palestinian prisoners, remove all check points, freeze settlements activities and as soon as Al-Azhar announce “al-Quds Document”  Israel will stop judaization of Jerusalem.

In realty, Israeli ambassador Yitzhak Levanon to Egypt arrived, in the early hours of this very day, to Cairo on a Turkish Airlines flight from Istanbul after he was evacuated in September following an attack on the embassy boycotted by Khalid's Brothers.

In realty:
Egypt resumes gas deliveries to Israel after 7th attack!
Standoff In Egypt's Tahrir Square

The "de facto" sraeli-Egyptian peace treaty is not on the table, whats on the "Brother's table is the dismantling and termination of the Syrian regime, "the totalitarian police-state apparatus which has been ruling Syria since the early sixties once and for all.
The Baath party is inherently undemocratic; it can't be reformed, it must be ended."


PA must end security coordination with Israel now

[ 18/11/2011 - 09:56 PM ]
By Khalid Amayreh in occupied Jerusalem

The apartheid Israeli regime decided last week to freeze the transfer of tax and customs revenue levied by Israel on behalf of the Palestinian Authority (PA).

The illegal and immoral measure, which Israel resorts to rather routinely, is intended to bully the Ramallah leadership to capitulate to Zionist whims and blackmailing tactics.
Israel never stopped threatening to strangulate the PA economically and financially if the latter didn't succumb to the Israeli will.
The systematic Israeli blackmail of the PA is a disgraceful expression of the Oslo Accords and other subsequent accords and understandings between the pseudo autonomous authority and the Nazi-like Israeli occupation regime.
Needless to say, these scandalous agreements which effectively reduced the Palestinian regime-from the supposed equal partner envisioned in these so-called agreements-to a vanquished supplicant begging for virtually everything from the Israeli side, from travel permits to basic commodities without which any modern society wouldn't be able to function.
But the story doesn't end here, which reminds us of what the legendary Arab poet, Abu'ttayeb al-Mutannabi, said about slaves who cling to their masters while crying out for freedom:
The great Arab poet said:
wa'inna domo'a la'yni ghodron berabbeha Itha konna ithra al ghadereena jawariya


(The tears of the eye betray a man if they keep running after the traitors)
The PA does possess numerous cards which, if used properly and forcefully, can force Israel to treat the Palestinians with a semblance of respect and dignity.
For example, there is strong ongoing security coordination between the Israeli occupation army and Palestinian security agencies.
This security coordination, which is actually no more than a mere subordination, subjugation and subservience by the PA security apparatus to the Israeli occupation army, covers the entirety of the West Bank and commits the PA to protect and safeguard Israeli interests, including guarding hundreds of Jewish settlers, most of whom indoctrinated in a Nazi-like ideology that teaches that non-Jews, e.g. Palestinians, living under Jewish rule, must submit to the Chosen People or master race and resign to a status of water carriers and wood hewers.
If the goyem (or non-Jews) don't submit and continue to demand human rights and civil liberties, then they must be either expelled or killed.
As mentioned above, Israel had resorted to withholding the transfer of Palestinian monies several times for the purpose of forcing the PA on its knees, with the PA doing virtually nothing to respond to the hostile provocation apart from issuing statements of denunciation and condemnation.
The estimated $100 million dollar which Israel transfers to PA coffers per month constitutes the lion's share of the Palestinian monthly budget. Hence, PA inaction and ostensible indifference with regard to this issue must invite the strongest condemnation from the Palestinian masses, especially those tens of thousands of civil servants and wage earners who receive their income from the PA regime.
The scandal becomes even more clarion and shocking when we know that a good part of the money withheld is used to pay salaries for those very soldiers and officers tasked with coordinating security matters with Israel, or, more correctly, guarding the Nazi-like settlers.
What can the PA do?
Without making a short story long, the PA can and must terminate all forms of security coordination with Israel. To begin with, this coordination is a stigma upon the forehead of every Palestinian political and security official, because in its simplest form, security coordination means collaboration with the enemy against the forces of resistance and freedom.
Moreover, it is amply clear that Israel accords "security coordination" with a pliant PA a paramount importance since that very coordination allows Israel to maintain its enduring occupation with minimal costs.
During the heights of the first and second intifadas or uprisings, Israel maintained a heavy security presence of more than 80,000 troops in the occupied territories.
Hence, a genuine threat by the PA to terminate security coordination with the Zionist regime is very likely to sound alarm bells in Tel Aviv and Washington. Needless to say, it is the latter than finances that security coordination and bribes the PA with more money to maintain that sinful relationship with Israel.
In any case, it is illogical and unethical to keep the Palestinian loaf of bread hostage to the rapacious and cannibalistic instincts of Talmudic sages who view all non-Jews as subhuman creatures whose lives have no sanctity and who have no human rights or dignity.
It is these so fuehrers of Zionism who control rather tightly the present Israeli government of Binyamin Netanyahu.
This throws the proverbial ball rather squarely onto the PA court.
In addition, I believe the PA should immediately revoke the scandalous Economic Protocol of Paris which made the very lifeline of the Palestinian economy subject to Israel's whims and haphazard, sadistic fantasies.
The PA regime did commit an unforgivable blunder in 1994; it is time the Ramallah leadership rectified and corrected that blunder which has cost our people dearly.
Finally, the PA and other Palestinian forces ought to do their utmost to get friendly Arab, Muslim and other states involved in enabling our people to withstand Israeli bullying and blackmail.
For example, the PA ought to press the new rulers of Egypt to make the Egyptian commitment to honor and uphold the Israeli-Egyptian peace treaty subject to Israeli treatment of the Palestinian people.
The same thing applies to all new governments and regimes in the Arab world. This is what everyone would call smart politics.

Otherwise, the Palestinian people should wait to seeing a mere reproduction of the same futility and same failure characterizing PA performance over the years.
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

AL Rejects Damascus Amendments - Muallem: We Don’t Want Battle, But “If It’s Imposed, We’ll Fight”

AL to Hold Crisis Talks on Syria, Rejects Damascus Amendments
Local Editor
As it announced a crisis talks over Syria on Thursday, the Arab League rejected changes proposed by Damascus to its proposal to send an observer mission there.

"The Arab League council will hold an extraordinary meeting on Thursday, at the level of foreign ministers, and will be presided by Qatar," Arab League Deputy Secretary General Ahmed Bin Hilli told reporters.

He said that the ministerial committee on Syria -- comprising Qatar, Egypt, Oman, Sudan, Algeria and Secretary General Nabil al-Arabi -- would meet at the Arab League headquarters on Wednesday to prepare for Thursday's meeting.

Few hours earlier, the Arab bloc rejected amendments suggested by Damascus to a document outlining plans for a 500-strong delegation to monitor the unrest in Syria, an Arab League source said.

"It was agreed that the amendments and appendices proposed by the Syrian side affect the core of the document and would radically change the nature of the mission which is to oversee the implementation of the Arab plan to end the crisis in Syria and protect Syrian civilians," the League said in a statement.

The pan-Arab group, which did not release details of the amendments proposed by Damascus, said it had notified Syria of its decision.

The statement said the Arab League had tasked Arabi to hold further talks with the Damascus government in a bid to have it sign the document on the observers within three days.

Muallem: We Don’t Want Battle, But “If It’s Imposed, We’ll Fight”
Local Editor
Syrian Foreign Minister said on Sunday that Damascus didn’t like to fight; however, "if the battle is imposed on us, we will fight”.

"We hope (the battle) will not be imposed on us... the problem in Syria can only be solved by the Syrians themselves", Muallem told a news conference in Damascus.
"If the battle is imposed on us, we will fight”, he went on to elaborate comments by President Bashar al-Assad published on Sunday, that he was ready to fight and die for Syria.

Muallem slammed members of the Arab League which he accused of working towards taking the Syrian issue to the United Nations Security Council.
"There is no room for hasty decisions, but rational thinking is needed because there are some parts of the Arab world which are using the Arab League as a tool to reach the Security Council," he said.

Turning to the issue of an Arab League threat to impose sanctions after the expiry of a deadline for Damascus to honor an agreement with the 22-nation bloc to end the unrest, Muallem brushed it off.
"We in Syria do not consider that the deadline is the important issue; the content is the important issue; and to reach an agreement with the Arab League is what counts," he said.

Muallem also dismissed as "wishful thinking" a warning by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that his country risked descending into civil war.
"When Mrs Clinton says the opposition is well-armed... it is, as they say in English, 'wishful thinking'," Muallem said.
Clinton warned on Friday that Syria was at the risk of a civil war.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

For Syria’s Detractors, the Real Issue is Iran


People attend a rally to show support for Syria's President Bashar al-Assad,in Damascus 20 November 2011. (Photo: REUTERS - Sana - Handout)

Published Sunday, November 20, 2011

It is not the ongoing confrontation between the regime and pro-reform protesters in Syria that preoccupies the Arab states supporting the overthrow of the Syrian regime. Diplomats from these countries make no mention of the internal situation when discussing their calculations. Instead, they speak candidly of the regional scene and the need for sweeping changes to be made in order to create new options.

In the words of one senior Gulf diplomat, an entire decade and billions of dollars have been spent trying to pull President Bashar Assad away from his alliance with Iran. He adds that efforts were also made to persuade Assad to change his country’s foreign policy in two key areas – Iraq and Lebanon – while keeping Syria’s relations with Iran intact. But to no avail.

Palestine did not figure in these discussions, according to the diplomat. The Arab states felt it was not essential to compel Damascus to toe their line on this issue. They were also wary of forcing Palestinian resistance groups close to Syria to look elsewhere. They were – and still are – hoping the US would agree to an early declaration of a Palestinian state and, eventually, act to help bring one into being. This, to their thinking, would undermine the advocates of armed resistance, and in turn deprive Iran and Syria of a powerful card. If agreement could meanwhile be reached with Assad over Iraq and Lebanon, life would be made harder for Iran and its allies, particularly Hezbollah in Lebanon.
According to the Gulf diplomat, the Syrians did attempt to make some policy changes.

As a result of a series of communications about Iraq – involving Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and other countries – an understanding was reached to support Ayyad Allawi becoming prime minister. Assad initially went along with this, and Syria helped encourage various Iraqi parties to participate in the last general elections. But he then proceeded to renege on the understandings reached with Ankara and the Gulf states and joined Iran in supporting Nouri al-Maliki instead.

This was accompanied by intensive lobbying aimed at bringing all the Iraqi political groups allied to Tehran and Damascus together in a united front. It was clear that the main rationale for forming this coalition was to oppose prolonging the presence of US forces in Iraq, which Allawi had endorsed. To achieve this, the Gulf diplomat said, the Iranians had to work hard to resolve the many disputes preventing Iraqi factions – especially the Sadrist current and the Supreme Islamic Council – from agreeing to join the same government as Maliki.

With regard to Lebanon, the Gulf diplomat said, Turkey and Qatar made a major effort to persuade Saudi Arabia to put on hold the issue of the UN Special Tribunal (STL) dealing with the assassination of former prime minister Rafiq Hariri. This entailed a deal under which then-premier Saad Hariri would make concessions over the STL in exchange for remaining in office. The terms were clearly spelled out in the final paper that was agreed upon. But Assad, the Gulf diplomat charged, deferred to Iran and Hezbollah and opted to oust Hariri.

The Qataris and Turks tried to patch things up. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyep Erdogan and the Emir of Qatar Hamad bin Khalifa even paid a surprise visit to Damascus – they were already airborne when Assad learned they were coming. According to the diplomat, the pair departed from the Syrian capital under the impression that Assad would persuade Hezbollah to accept the deal. But their respective foreign ministers, Ahmet Davetoglu and Hamad bin Jasem, were then told to their surprise that Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah had given it the thumbs-down, and that the then-opposition would press ahead with its moves to depose Hariri, who was duly toppled.

The Gulf diplomat had little to say about the nature of contacts with Syria in the immediate aftermath of these events. But he indicated that things took a new turn after protests broke out in towns across Syria and it became clear that the regime was unable to contain the situation. It was decided to devise, and forcefully pursue, a plan aimed at forcing Assad to make concessions on two fronts. First, to share power with an expanded array of political forces – the Turks and Qataris made clear in their correspondence and discussions that this meant the Muslim Brotherhood. Secondly, to put Syria’s foreign policy in abeyance, pending its reformulation to reflect the new political order.

Syria’s response was to halt all further contacts. Assad saw these stipulations as American dictates. He told a number of Arab and other visitors that these same demands had previously been conveyed to him directly by the US, and also via Europeans.

The senior Gulf diplomat left many questions unanswered. But it is safe to say that the US-European-Gulf axis will continue piling the political, security and economic pressure on the regime in Syria, and that it is likely to go further.

Ibrahim al-Amine is editor-in-chief of al-Akhbar.

This article is an edited translation from the Arabic Edition.
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

WSJ: 'Hezbollah electronically disabling Israeli drones?'

Via FLC

Hezbollah Waits and Prepares

[hezbollah]
HEZBOLLAH supporters in Beirut watch a televised
address by Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah in August 2010.

With new tensions over Iran's nuclear program, the militant group stands ready to retaliate against Israel


Agence France-Presse/Getty Images
On a recent Saturday afternoon, a radar operated by French United Nations peacekeepers picked up a pilotless Israeli reconnaissance drone crossing into south Lebanon. It was given no more attention than any of the dozens of other surveillance missions flown by the Israelis in Lebanese airspace each month.

But when the drone passed above Wadi Hojeir, a yawning valley with steep, brush-covered slopes, it abruptly vanished from the radar screen. The startled peacekeepers contacted the Lebanese army, and a search of the rugged valley was conducted in the early-evening gloom. Nothing was found.

No one can recall the last time that an Israeli drone malfunctioned over Lebanon and crashed, and there were no reports of antiaircraft fire. The Israelis have said nothing. Neither has Hezbollah, the Lebanese militant group and arch foe of Israel. The peacekeeping force is now abuzz with speculation that Hezbollah may have found a way of electronically disabling drones.

It is food for thought as tensions escalate once more between the West and Iran, Hezbollah's ideological patron, over the Islamic Republic's nuclear ambitions. A report by the International Atomic Energy Agency released last week claimed that Iran has been engaged in "activities relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device." It was the IAEA's toughest report yet on Iran, and it was preceded by a flurry of articles in the Israeli press saying that the Israeli government was seriously considering a strike against Iran's nuclear facilities.

Iran has delivered its own warnings. Brig. Gen. Masoud Jazayeri, the deputy chief of the country's armed forces, was quoted saying that "the smallest action by Israel [against Iran] and we will see its destruction." He added that plans for retaliation were already in place.

Many analysts believe that those plans could include directing Hezbollah to unleash its military might against Israel, pummeling it with thousands of long-range rockets, placing the Jewish state's heartland on the frontline for the first time since 1948.

Hezbollah and Israel last came to blows in July 2006, when the Lebanese militants fought the Israeli army to a surprise standstill in the valleys and hills of south Lebanon. Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah's charismatic leader, proclaimed a "divine victory" against Israel, but since then he has been careful not to provoke another round of fighting.

But the quiet has not stopped the two sides from making feverish preparations for another encounter, one that neither Hezbollah nor Israel wants but that both believe is probably inevitable.

The rate of recruitment into Hezbollah's ranks has soared. New recruits are bused to secret training camps in the Bekaa Valley, where they endure lengthy marches over the craggy limestone mountains carrying backpacks weighed down with rocks........

More

"Hezbollah! You're Next!"

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Hasbara: ‘Bibi has turned Israel into Iran’

Source

One has to agree that when it comes to demonize one’s enemy – no one can do a better job than a Zionist-Jew writer. He can turn Ahmadinejad into a Hitler or even a Jew. He can turn Qaddafi into a Jew and anti-Semite. He can turn Ayatullah Ali Khamenie into the Arab-hating Rabbi Ovadia Josef.
Yoel Marcus in his Ha’aretz Op-Ed (November 18, 2011), entitled ‘Netanyahu’s policies have turned Israel into Iran“, wrote: “Both Khamenei and Yosef have influence on question of war and peace. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad isn’t going to push that button without authorization from Khamenei, just as our prime minister and defense minister make pilgrimages to our Master and Teacher on the issue of Iranian threat“.

Rabbi Yosef is the founder of Ultra-Orthodox Shepardic political party, Shas, which has 11 members in the Knesset. Shas is part of Netanyahu’s Jewish supremacist Likud government. Rabbi Yosef is known for demanding the annihilation of Arabs in 2001. Rabbi Josef is not recognized as Israel’s spiritual leader and such has no authority to declare a war under Israel law and he is not the Supreme Commander of Israel’s Armed Forces. Contrary to that, Ayatullah Ali Khamenei doesn’t have a political party and MPs in Iranian Majlis. In fact, Iranian Constitution doesn’t allow registered political parties at all. Ayatullah Khamenei was elected President of Iran for eight years before selected to replace Imam Khomeini as the Guardian of the Islamic Revolution after later’s death. As country’s Spiritual Leader, under Iranian Constitution, Ayatullah Khamenei heads Iran’s Armed Forces and has the authority to declare war to defend the country or Islamic Revolution. Furthermore, Ayatullah Khamenei has never called for the annihilation of Jews or Israelis.

Interestingly, on the “Iranian threat”, Yoel Marcus provided the answer himself by quoting former Mossad chief Gen. Efraim Halevy, who said: “The Ultra-Orthodox are scarier than the Iranian bomb“. What in fact Efraim Halevy said, as reported by Israeli daily Ynet on November 4 – “The growing Haredi radicalization poses a bigger risk than Ahmadinejad”. Haley said, adding that “the Ultra-Orthodox extremism has darkened our lives“. Former Mossad Chief also warned against an Israeli strike on Islamic Republic; saying that the result of confrontation could be devastating for the Mideast.
“The state of Israel cannot be destroyed. An attack on Iran could affect not only Israel, but the entire region for 100 years“.

Incidently, former Mossad chief Gen. Meir Dagan claimed last year that Iran would not be able to produce a nuclear bomb before 2015.
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

OWS: Too Big to Fail



An idea whose time has come resonates globally. November 17 marked two months since beginning in New York. Earlier Middle East and European protests inspired it. Now it's spreading everywhere across North and South America, Europe, Asia, Africa, and Oceania.

In America within weeks, hundreds of large and small cities in all 50 states got involved. Protesters weathered snow, rain, cold, pepper spray, tear gas, beatings, arrests, and evictions. Police confrontations, in fact, inspired larger turnouts.

Mother Jones magazine said participants represent "a horizontal, autonomous, leaderless, modified-consensus-based system with roots in anarchist thought." In fact, they're revolutionaries in the best sense of the term.

They've "tap(ped) into the rising feeling among many Americans that economic opportunity has been squashed by corporate greed and the influence of the very rich in politics."

One protester's sign read, "You can't shut down occupation - We're everywhere."

Another said, "You cannot evict an idea whose time has come."

Still another lifted high read, "OCCUPY EVERYTHING."

In fact, it's long overdue after decades of social injustice, heading America toward banana republicanization.

Wealth disparity is extreme. Ordinary people are increasingly marginalized, exploited, and left on their own to survive, sink or swim.

Jobs are harder than ever to find. Good ones paying living wages and benefits are disappearing. College students end up debt entrapped for life.

Super-rich crooks and corrupt politicians conspire to grab everything for themselves. Freedom is an endangered species. Growing poverty, hunger, homelessness and despair are increasing.

Federal, state and local officials plan budget cuts instead of help. Human deprivation isn't discussed in high places, only ways to grab more wealth and power. In plain sight, America's no longer fit to live in. Neither are other Western countries, depriving the many for the few.

Targeting Wall Street, corporate greed, and power brokers in high places, OWS protesters demand change.

November 17 marked two months of activism. Occupy Wall Street.org called it a "Historic Day of Action for the 99%."

In New York, over 30,000 rallied. NYPD estimated 32,500. Likely it was thousands more, the most anywhere in America so far on one day. Protesters sense "a powerful and diverse civic movement for social justice is on the ascent."

Hopefully they're right. One protester spoke for others saying:

"Our political system should serve all of us - not just the very rich and powerful. Right now, Wall Street owns Washington. We are the (left out) 99%, and we are here to reclaim our democracy."

Dozens of other cities participated nationwide and globally. Occupy Police got involved. They call themselves part of the 99%. An anonymous sergeant said, "I'm a cop and I support the ideal of Occupy. We're on the same team."

A web site logo read, "We are the 99% protecting 100%." Philadelphia police captain Ray Lewis joined New York's OWS and got arrested. He vowed to stay involved when released. He doesn't fear arrest, he said, when people are starving or freezing to death on streets.

"All the cops are just workers for the 1%, and don't even realize they're being exploited," he said. "As soon as I'm let out of jail, I'll be right back here, and they'll have to arrest me again."

Occupy Marines (OccupyOMC) are involved, saying they'll "support the movement. We will support demonstrators with organization, direction, supply and logistics, and leadership." They feature a logo saying "Semper Occupare."

They also highlight Operation Returning Freedom, including a New Common Sense Charter for equality and participation in government for change. They represent the 99%'s "collective conscience" against "oligarchic" America.

Occupy Veterans, Veterans for Peace, Occupy Writers, and Occupy Filmakers are involved. So are people from all walks of life who care and want change. Fordham University Professor Paul Levinson said OWS represents direct democracy. Cornell University Professor Cornel West called it a "democratic awakening."

Over 1,000 writers signed an online petition, saying:
"We the undersigned writers and all who will join us, support Occupy Wall Street and the Occupy Movement around the world."

Celebrities are involved, including folk singer Pete Seeger, Joan Baez, and Arlo Guthrie.

Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek said:

"They tell you we are dreamers. The true dreamers are those who think things can go on indefinitely the way they are. We are not dreamers. We are awakening from a dream which is turning into a nightmare."

World systems analyst Immanuel Wallerstein calls OWS "the most important political happening in the United States since the uprisings in 1968...."

Conditions are right. Accurately calculated, not Census data based on a long out-of-date threshold, poverty in America affects 100 million or more and rising. Unemployment's at 23%. Over 26 million Americans wanting work can't find it. Nothing's being done to help them.

Every social measure shows Depression-level human need. America's middle class is its working poor. People everywhere in need are mad. Global protests show it.

"It doesn't really matter" what spark ignited things. They're happening, growing, and inspiring others because real grievances demand addressing responsibly at a time politicians are turning a blind eye.

Asked what they wanted, people said long denied justice. Even the initially dismissive New York Times said "(e)xtreme inequality is the hallmark of a dysfunctional economy, dominated by a financial sector that is driven as much by speculation, gouging and government backing as by productive investment."

It was a remarkable admission by the nation's leading establishment broadsheet - wealth and power's longstanding voice.

According to Wallerstein, "(t)he movement has become respectable," but with that comes "danger." Already, federal, state and local overt and covert counterattacks are apparent.

Success also breeds other problems, including a "diversity of views." At issue is not becoming "the Scylla of being a tight cult....too narrowly based, and the Charybdis of no longer having a political coherence because it is too broad."

No simple way exists to avoid either extreme or other pitfalls. One is lack of leadership, including a national voice like Martin Luther King for civil rights. Another is a coherent, unified message, focusing on what matters most.

It's not enough to denounce Wall Street and corporate greed. Key is demanding real solutions and sustaining long-term struggle. This one's the mother of them all.

Most important is returning money power to public hands where it belongs. Without it, little else is possible long-term.

It's vital to make banking a public utility, break up too-big-to fail giants, close or nationalizing insolvent ones, establish laws and regulations with teeth, and prosecute crooks when they're caught, especially high level ones so everyone knows grand theft won't be tolerated.

Other key issues include ending corporate personhood, getting money out of politics, ending duopoly power and imperial wars, making corporations and the rich pay their fair share, and forcing government, in fact, to be of, by and for everyone, not solely for America's privileged like now.

None of this can happen short-term. Decades perhaps are needed to transform today's America into a socially just new society. In other words, little is accomplished by achieving things part way. Total change is needed. Softening today's system won't work. It never did before and won't now because gains are easily lost.

Wage slavery replaced its chattel antecedent. Hard won labor, civil, and social gains are gone or on the chopping block to disappear. So aren't voting rights when corporate-controlled machines do it for us, yet does it matter under a duopoly money-controlled system offering no choice whatever.

Wallerstein believes "the movement (may go) from strength to strength." Perhaps it can "force short-term restructuring of what the government will actually do to minimize" real pain people experience.

Longer-term perhaps people will address capitalism's "structural crisis (and) the major geopolitical transformations" now occurring "in a multipolar world."

Even if OWS wanes, its legacy will last, like "the uprisings of 1968...." Better times are possible. Change never comes easily or quickly. Enough committed people can make a difference. OWS "is making a big difference."

Indeed, building a global movement is significant. Key though is giving it legs in the face of exhaustion, winter cold, police repression, and political leaders paying it little more than lip service so far while they slash social justice programs to continue serving wealth and power interests at the expense of all else.

Off to an impressive start, what's ahead for OWS isn't known. Given the state of today's America and where it's heading, the stakes are too high for failure. There's no turning back now!

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

posted by Steve Lendman @ 12:39 AM  

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

Syria 'will not bow down' to foreign pressure: Assad

Assad prepared to fight and die for Syria if faced with foreign intervention.

LONDON: President Bashar al-Assad said Syria would not bow down in the face of mounting international pressure over his lethal crackdown on dissent, in an interview with The Sunday Times.

Assad told the British weekly newspaper he was "definitely" prepared to fight and die for Syria if faced with foreign intervention. "This goes without saying and is an absolute," he said.

The president said he felt sorrow for each drop of Syrian blood spilt but insisted Damascus must go after armed rebel gangs and enforce law and order. "The conflict will continue and the pressure to subjugate Syria will continue," he said.

"I assure you that Syria will not bow down and that it will continue to resist the pressure being imposed on it."

Assad accused the Arab League, whose deadline for Syria to stop its clampdown has expired, of creating a pretext for Western military intervention, which would trigger an "earthquake" across the Middle East.

In an interview at the Tishreen Palace in Damascus, the 46-year-old said the solution to the violence which the United Nations says has killed more than 3,500 people since mid-March was not to pull back his troops.

"The only way is to search for the armed people, chase the armed gangs, prevent the entry of arms and weapons from neighbouring countries, prevent sabotage and enforce law and order," he said.
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

'The Hubris of Attacking Syria'

The world is changing. Washington should recognize the limits of its authority and resources. And it should stop starting unnecessary wars—like in Syria..."

Via FLC

"...Why attack Syria? Damascus is a nasty actor in the region but poses no threat to America. Although Brodsky complains that Syria obstructs U.S. objectives “with impunity,” that provides no case for war. After all, Washington’s foreign-policy goals are infinite: there is virtually no nation which does not interfere with one or another American of foreign-policy design. The U.S. often objects when another country merely decides to act in its own interest.
In the case of Syria, the strongest argument for military action is a shameless bootstrap: The Bush administration invaded Iraq, Syria’s neighbor, sparking a devastating civil war and destabilizing the region. Washington now is upset that Damascus has responded in kind, failing to halt bad actors entering—and perhaps encouraging them to enter—Iraq. It is extraordinary hubris: Washington goes to war with Iraq, thereby threatening Syria. Leading American analysts suggest launching a preventive war against Damascus. When Syria seeks to protect itself by undermining the U.S. occupation of Iraq, Washington declares that to be another justification for going to war with Syria....
Some in Washington have been reduced to arguing that the United States should bomb countries today because, if it does not, they may develop weapons to deter Washington from bombing them tomorrow...The humanitarian argument for bombing Damascus is particularly weak. Some three thousand Syrians have died in months of protests against the Assad regime. That’s a tragedy, but a modest casualty toll in a world awash in violence.
Humanitarian intervention once was touted as necessary to stop genocide. Now it is proposed as a measure to stop the sort of limited conflicts which dot the globe. If three thousand deaths warrant war, then there no longer is any meaningful standard against making war everywhere, all the time. In countries like India, Nigeria and Pakistan, deadly conflict between varying religious and ethnic groups is common. Equally appropriate for intervention are Bahrain and Belarus, Burma and Congo, Cuba and Iran, North Korea and Russia, Sri Lanka and Sudan, Venezuela and Zimbabwe... the allies caused the deaths of tens of thousands of Libyans by prolonging a low-tech civil war in which the fighting was the greatest killer of civilians. The United States and NATO wanted to achieve regime change on the cheap, not humanitarian rescue. Nor is it clear that the conflict is really over as different armed factions vie for power....Washington would have no control over the outcome of an attack on Syria....But why should anyone assume that coercing Damascus—presumably targeting the Assad government and security forces with military strikes of some sort—would turn out well? Just ask all those people for whom the Arab Spring has turned brown, such as the democracy protesters and Coptic Christians in Egypt.

Iraq is an even better example. The Bush administration believed that it was going to costlessly oust Saddam Hussein, impose a pro-American exile as president, create a Western-style democracy which uplifted women and recognized Israel, build bases for use against Iran and any other U.S. adversary, and remain in Iraq forever. These all proved to be fantasies. Alas, not fanciful was the civilian Iraqi death toll—perhaps 200,000 civilians dead, hundreds of thousands injured, and millions displaced from their homes....
Maybe Syria would turn out better. But maybe not, which is why some religious and ethnic minorities there view Assad as the better of some very bad options. What gives Washington the right to gamble with other people’s lives?
Instead of dreaming up foolish new wars to fight, Washington policy makers should return to what an aide to President George W. Bush famously derided as the “reality-based community.” The anonymous staffer confidently told author Ron Suskind that “when we act, we create our own reality.”
Unfortunately, in Iraq and elsewhere that turned out to be the reality of death and failure.
Moreover, America no longer can afford to fight all the wars promoted by Washington’s ivory-tower warriors. Uncle Sam is broke. The national debt is $15 trillion. Social Security and Medicare account for around $107 trillion in unfunded liabilities. A host of other liabilities loom large.
Economist Laurence Kotlikoff figures that the American government’s total debts and unfunded liabilities total $211 trillion. Added to this is the cost of Washington’s outsize military budget—half of the world’s spending, double the real outlays of a decade ago, more in real terms than at any point during the Cold War, Korean War and Vietnam War. What drives Pentagon spending today is maintaining a force structure capable of patrolling the globe and remaking failed societies, tasks largely irrelevant to America’s defense.
The world is changing. Washington should recognize the limits of its authority and resources. And it should stop starting unnecessary wars—like in Syria..."
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian