Monday, 7 July 2014

Syrian Armed Forces Operation against ISIS Heaquarters, Capture of Senior Rebel Commanders

Syrian Armed Forces Operation against ISIS Heaquarters, Capture of Senior Rebel Commanders

Global Research, July 04, 2014
Global Research Editor’s Note: This report remains to be confirmed.
The operation has taken place from 1 am to 5 am. on July 4th, local time
With fake attacks, Syrian army jets flew over Raqqa at low altitude, in waves, repeatedly breaking the sound barrier, and creating a real panic situation, forcing the terrorists into underground shelters.
At 2 am the first attack occurs at ISIS headquarters, 25 km east of Raqqa, destroying anti-aircraft batteries and heavy machine guns locations.
The real surprise takes place via three transport helicopters that landed, silently, entire Special Units under the command of several Syrian senior officers
mi-35
July 4, 2014 ~ Sensational details about the attacks and Special Operations by the Syrian Armed Forces against ISIL mercenary gangs on the area of Raqqa last night.
Sources of the military intelligence services knew that an important meeting of ISIL-ISIS commanders, at highest level, took place in ISIS headquarters.
The special units of the SAA approached the ISIL HQ silently, covered by the roar of the jet, circling the field and attacking with great surprise the terrorists.
Other units, in the meantime, take up position along the road leading to the camp of the terrorists, with the support of aviation and helicopters, incinerating any car and vehicle of the ISIL mercenaries.
The breakthrough is lightning-fast, with the following results:
* The entire terrorist group inside, more than 300 gunmen, are eliminated
* 4 regional commanders of ISIS, including Iraq, neutralized
* Commanders and figures at the highest level of ISIS-ISIL are taken prisoner: maximum restraint on their identity, but make sure that their catch will cause drastic changes in the entire region.
* Only one soldier of the special units wounded, mildly is assured.
The unity of the Syrian Arab Army, with its precious booty of mysterious prisoners, embarks on the transport helicopters and walks away.
The other ‘air unit support’ in the meantime continue to work with low-altitude attacks, breaking the sound barrier, for another hour.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

60 minutes: On Palestine, the conflicts in Ukraine, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon



سوريا | قريباً... نهاية المرحلة الساخنة من الصراع؟

عدد المشاهدات : 770 | تاريخ النشر : 2014-07-07 02:32:01
 ناهض حتر

يقرّر الجيش السوري، مكان المعارك وحجمها ونتائجها؛ يحرز تقدما سلساً في حلب، العاصمة الاقتصادية وموئل القوس السياسي للدولة الوطنية، بينما «جبهة النصرة» وبقايا «المعارضة» المسلحة، تنهار بين كمّاشة القوات السورية وميليشيات «داعش». قريباً، سيكون المشهد «صافياً»: دمشق في مواجهة «الخلافة»، ليس فقط في الجزيرة الفراتية، بل وعبر الحدود السورية ــــ العراقية.
الرئيس بشار الأسد، بدأ التحضير فعلا للمرحلة التالية؛ سلاح الجوّ بدأ معركة منظمة مع «الخلافة»، ووفد التنسيق العسكري السوري يحطّ في بغداد؛ هنا لا يوجد الأميركيون وحدهم، الإيرانيون والسوريون أكثر حضوراً، ومن ورائهم روسيا... وعرضها واضح لجهة فتح مستودعات أسلحتها فوراً للجيش العراقي.
التمرد الداخلي المسلح يوشك على التلاشي في سوريا؛ كانت الانتخابات الرئاسية لحظة الحسم فيها. ما سيبقى عصابات «الخلافة» في شمالي شرقي البلاد. لم يعد هناك أدنى التباس في طبيعة الصراع إذاً؛ الخيار المحلي والإقليمي والدولي سيكون الآن بين الرئيس بشار الأسد والخليفة أبو بكر البغدادي!
لا تزال واشنطن تحاول الهروب من هذا الخيار؛ تعترف بأن انتصار «المعتدلين» على الرئيس الأسد مستحيل، ولكنها تخصص نصف مليار دولار لدعم جهود ثالثة ليس لإسقاط النظام السوري ــــ فهذا مشروع أصبح من الماضي ــــ ولكن لتجهيز قوات قبلية في الجزيرة الفراتية تتجه نحو الانفصال بنفطها وثرواتها أو حتى الانضمام للكيان العربي السني العراقي، بما يجعله كياناً قابلاً للحياة، قبلياً، معتدلاً وموالياً لواشنطن؛ بالنسبة للشق السوري من المشروع الأميركي الجديد، سينتهي إلى الارتطام بجدار الدولة الوطنية السورية؛ لن ينتج عنه سوى المزيد من الدمار والإرهاب.
ستكشف الوثائق السرية، لاحقاً وليس بعيداً، أن مشروع تكرار الوهابية (التحالف القبلي ــــ التكفيري) في بادية الشام، ذلك المشروع المرتبط ببيئة حركته ــــ ومن هنا خطورته ــــ لم يكن من بنات أفكار «داعش»، بل كان تصوراً إستشراقياً موضوعاً على المائدة الامبريالية السعودية ــــ التركية، إنما بصياغة سياسية تستخدم الإرهابيين مؤقتاً ولا تضع المشروع تحت قيادتهم؛ هكذا، دفعت استخبارات الحلف الأسود الثلاثي، «داعش» نحو حتفها، بإعلان «الخلافة»، ما يسهّل فصلها عن بيئتها والتحضير لضربها، ولكن بعد استخدامها لابتزاز الايرانيين والسوريين، سياسياً وأمنياً، والعودة إلى العراق وتهيئة الظروف لتقسيمه، وسحق المعارضة الفلسطينية ــــ الأردنية لخطة تصفية القضية، وفرض مشروع وزير الخارجية الأميركي، جون كيري، للحل النهائي.
من سوء حظ الحلف الثلاثي الأسود (واشنطن، أنقرة، الرياض) أن «الخلافة» هيمنت على سواها من التنظيمات والقبائل في سوريا والعراق. وهي تتجذّر. ومع كل يوم يصرفه الحلف في المناورة والابتزاز يسرّع في فرز الأوراق، ويقود إلى مشهد دمشق ــــ بغداد في مواجهة الإرهاب. وفي مشهد صاف كهذا، تستعيد موسكو ــــ طهران، موقع المفاوض القويّ في كل الملفات؛ من سوريا إلى العراق إلى النووي الإيراني إلى أوكرانيا. وليس بلا معنى أن مسؤولاً روسياً رفيعاً توقع «أن المرحلة النشطة للنزاع في جنوب شرق أوكرانيا ستنتهي خلال بضعة أسابيع»؛ بالطبع، فأوروبا تضغط اليوم للتهرب من الحرب الأميركية بالوكالة على حدود روسيا، وتفضّل حلاً سلمياً يكفل مصالحها الاقتصادية، ويؤمن لها امدادات الغاز قبل الشتاء.
في العراق، نوري المالكي يتمسك بالحكم بشجاعة، ويتجه نحو المواجهة؛ من الواضح أنه يستند إلى قرار استراتيجي اتخذه المحور؛ فهل يستعيد أنفاسه الآن، ويكفّ عن الاستنجاد بالأميركيين، يحجّم وجودهم؟ يطردهم؟ هذا المسار هو، وحده، الذي يكفل له البقاء ليس فحسب في مواجهة الخصوم في المناطق الشمالية الغربية، بل، وأيضاً، لجم «الحلفاء» في بغداد والجنوب؛ يمكنه أن يعتمد على المحور، ويقاتل، ويحسم، على أن يستغل الشقاق الحاصل في صفوف التمرد المسلح بسبب اعلان «الخلافة»، نحو مصالحة وطنية مع القوى العربية السنية، على أساس وحدة العراقيين العرب في مواجهة الإرهاب والتوسع الكردي.
تقسيم العراق هو قلب المشروع الأميركي الذي يحقق لواشنطن عدة أهداف معاً: (1) منع إعادة تشكل العراق كدولة وطنية وقوة إقليمية تهدد السعودية، (2) كسر التواصل البري بين ايران وسوريا، وتهديد البلدين بكيان مجاور معاد، (3) إنشاء دولة كردستان الموسعة بضم كركوك ونصف الموصل، مصدراً كبيراً للنفط، وموطئاً موثوقاً للوجود الأميركي، وحليفاً إقليمياً ثابتاً لإسرائيل، ولعضو الناتو، تركيا التي يمكنها تصفية القضية الكردية خاصّتها في دولة كردستان العراق، الدولة القومية الشرعية الوحيدة للأمة الكردية في المنطقة!
في الأردن ما يشبه الانقلاب على إسرائيل؛ أصبح من المحسوم أن القوى الوطنية في البلاد يمكنها التحشيد لإسقاط أي حل للقضية الفلسطينية لا يكفل الدولة والحدود وحق العودة، في حين تتجمع نذر الانتفاضة الثالثة لتعيد رسم خارطة الصراع في المنطقة.
بضعة أسابيع في أوكرانيا... لكن ربما بضعة شهور في بلادنا.

الاخبار
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Kiev to create 'filtration camps' for East Ukrainians?

The Saker

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Dead teenagers: Netanyahu’s criminal settlement policy put them in harm’s way


The BBC, that paragon of broadcasting, repeatedly fails to give the necessary context when reporting events in occupied Palestine. The rest of the mainstream media are equally guilty but we still tend to look to the BBC as the standard setter, a lofty position from which it has slid a long way recently.
In its many reports about the three teenage Israeli squatters allegedly kidnapped and murdered by Hamas, I have never heard the BBC explain that the Fourth Geneva Convention, article 49, forbids an occupying power to transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies and that doing so constitutes a war crime.
So when it comes to pinning the blame for the triple killing the finger must surely point to Israel’s prime minister Netanyahu and his delinquent government. By willfully expanding their illegal settlement policy even when so-called peace talks were going on, and knowing full well that reprisals might follow, they deliberately put these youngsters in harm’s way.
We know that at least one of them lived in a settlement built on stolen land. Information on the others is hazy but WAFA, the Palestinian news agency, refers to all three as settlers. If that’s the case, they were trespassers in the West Bank. And like all squatter-settlers their very presence on Palestinian territory, let alone their arrogant behaviour, would have been provocative in the extreme and an affront to the rightful Palestinian residents. The risks to the boys’ safety were painfully obvious.
Many suspect, with good reason, that the abduction and murder was a false flag operation, in which case the finger of suspicion stays pointed at Netanyahu. Of course, Netanyahu is determined to pin the blame on Hamas one way or another. There are many in the British parliament too who are eager to give Hamas a good kicking and seem to have made up their minds already. For example,
Robert Halfon (Harlow) (Con):
“The world has seen the tragic and brutal murders of three Israeli youngsters, most probably by Hamas. Will my right hon. Friend give the Israeli Government every possible support at this time? Does he agree that, far from showing restraint, Israel must do everything possible to take out Hamas terrorist networks, and will he give the Israeli Government support in that?”
The Prime Minister (David Cameron):
“What I say to my hon. Friend, who I know is passionate about these issues, and to everyone in the House, is that this was an absolutely appalling and inexcusable act of terror, and one can only imagine the effect on the families and friends of those poor teenagers, and what happened to them. It is very important that Britain will stand with Israel as it seeks to bring to justice those who are responsible. We also welcome the fact that President Abbas has firmly condemned the abduction and tried to help find those people. As my hon. Friend said, it is important that all security operations are conducted with care so that further escalation is avoided. The people responsible for this should be found and brought to justice.”
But Israel still hasn’t produced evidence that Hamas was responsible, as when Netanyahu’s spin doctor was challenged repeatedly by a lone BBC reporter in this video clip
The British government, questioned in the House of Commons, says it has seen and heard no evidence that Hamas was involved.  On 1 July Hugh Robertson, Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office told MPs: “As for who is responsible, it is too early to say. The British Government have no firm evidence, and nothing from the Islamic state in Jerusalem… The Israeli Government are very clear about the fact that Hamas was responsible. When I was in Israel 10 days ago, there was some indication on the Palestinian side that that might be correct, but we have no hard evidence in London to back that up.”
Richard Burden (Birmingham, Northfield) (Lab) asked:
“Will he [Robertson] say to the House, in the appalling situation we are in at the moment, what he thinks are the responsibilities under international law of the Palestinian Authority and what are the responsibilities of the Israeli Government as an occupying power in the West Bank, and will he confirm that collective punishment of the Palestinian people is a crime under international law?”
But Robertson simply sidestepped the point about Israel’s responsibilities and the collective punishment inflicted on the Palestinians. It wouldn’t do to upset those nice racist friends of Mr Cameron in Tel Aviv.
Squatter-settlers are often armed, behave abominably and are protected by the Israeli military. Many are religious nutters. What would the citizens of Witney in Oxfordshire or Kansas City USA make of gun-toting, foreign intruders swaggering down their high street causing mayhem, burning olive groves, driving residents from their homes, harassing shoppers, terrifying children on their way to school and even driving their cars at them?
The death of any youngster is a tragedy. And it is obscene to claim, as some do, that one young person is more precious than another. So here’s another piece of context you won’t hear from the BBC or any other mainstream medium. Since the second intifada (September 2000) 1,656 Palestinian women and children have been killed in the occupied territories by Israeli security forces and civilians. In the same period just 256 Israeli women and children were killed in Israel by Palestinians. The arithmetic puts the tragedy of the three Israeli teenagers in a more sobering light. The figures are supplied by B’Tselem, an Israeli information and human rights organisation.
As of yesterday, at least 640 Palestinians had been arrested since the start of the Israeli military crackdown following the alleged disappearance of the three teen settlers, who were later found killed. These included 59 released prisoners in the exchange deal of 2011, including 11 pre-Oslo prisoners bringing up the number of pre-Oslo prisoners in Israeli jails to 41, said the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in a statement.
11 Members of Parliament had also been arrested, bringing up the number of imprisoned parliamentarians to 22. The number of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails now stands at over 5,800.
Yesterday, in a Commons debate ‘Protecting Children in Conflict’, Grahame Morris (Easington) (Lab) said:
“There is a danger that the current climate of vengeance and retribution will worsen the situation. Uri Ariel, the Israeli housing Minister, has called for a “proper Zionist response”, meaning an acceleration of Israel’s illegal expansion of settlements in the west bank and East Jerusalem and a programme of punitive house demolitions. The Israeli Deputy Minister of Defence, Danny Danon, said that Israel should make the entire Palestinian leadership pay a heavy price for the killing of the three Israeli teenagers, and Mr Lieberman, the Israeli Foreign Minister, advocated a full-scale invasion of Gaza as a legitimate response. In the name of security, rights, justice and peace, the demands of these politicians must be rebutted, resisted and challenged by the international community.”
He might have added, the international media. But the BBC and the rest still treat those animals with utmost reverence.
Stuart Littlewood
4 July 2014
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Israelis confess to burning Palestinian teen alive

A funeral ceremony for Palestinian teen, burned alive by Israeli extremists
A funeral ceremony for Palestinian teen, burned alive by Israeli extremists
Monday, July 07, 2014 8:59 AM
A group of six Israeli settlers, who have been arrested in connection with the murder of a Palestinian teenager in East al-Quds, have reportedly confessed to their crime.

The Israeli suspects were arrested early on Sunday over the death of 16-year-old Muhammad Abu Khdeir.

They have admitted to kidnapping the Palestinian teen from a neighborhood of East al-Quds and then beating and burning him to death.

Palestinian sources said on Saturday that postmortem examination findings have shown that Abu Khdeir was burned alive and hit with a blunt object on the head.

The brutal killing of the Palestinian teenager has sparked a wave of protests across the occupied territories.

New video footage has also emerged showing masked Israeli forces brutally beating a Palestinian-American teenager in East al-Quds while in police custody.

The 15-year-old boy has been identified as Tariq Abu Khdeir, the cousin of Mohammed Abu Khdeir.

In reaction to recent crimes against Palestinians, the acting president of the Palestinian national unity government, Mahmoud Abbas, called on Sunday for an international investigation into crimes committed against Palestinians.

According to the latest figures revealed by the Palestinian Ministry of Information in Ramallah, Israeli forces have killed one Palestinian kid in every three days for the past 13 years.  Based on the same source, nearly 1,500 children have been killed during the Second Intifada, or popular uprising, between 2000 and 2013.
NTJ/MB

Related


- See more

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Forgive us for not dying in Slavyansk

The Saker

by Igor Druze (Igor Strelkov’s Advisor)


 

translated from Russian by Gleb Bazov

The Militia was forced to leave Slavyansk. Of course, we were prepared to stand firm to the end, and were ready to obey any order to that effect from the Commander-in-Chief. All of us had prepared wills and said our farewells to our kin. But we are military people, and we also were prepared to follow a different order. All the more so, because we trust absolutely both Igor Strelkov’s decency and his military experience.

After all, this man is a veteran of four wars; as a volunteer, to boot. What would have happened if the Russian army had decided to hold Moscow to the end in 1812, or Kiev in 1941? There would not have been the taking of Paris or, respectively, Berlin; instead, the army—“Russia’s only ally”—would have perished in vain. I am absolutely certain of our victory, and that we will also liberate Kiev. The only remaining question is: at what price in blood and how quickly?

Accordingly, it is very strange suddenly to read the wild speculations of some purported patriots that Igor Strelkov is now guilty of everything under the sun. Including—of the surrender of the city. It would be better if they remembered how [Igor Strelkov] and his fearless fighters for months heroically stopped the advance of an entire army, even though they numbered only in the hundreds, and, by the end, consisted of a couple of thousands [militiamen]. Armed almost exclusively with small arms, they held back an offensive by fifteen thousand professional servicemen.

And, meanwhile, Igor Strelkov asked for help, spoke of the need for the introduction of peacekeeping troops, or, at least, for massive supplies of heavy weaponry from Russia. But no one listened to him. Nay, in the last few days, several commanders even betrayed [the Militia], thereby stripping Slavyansk of flanking defences on the side of its surburb, Nikolayevka.

Without any hope of help from Russia, further defence of the city by the numerically small forces of the militiamen against a regular army would have meant a futile death for practically the only battle-worthy, experienced units of the Donbass People’s Militia.

As well as the complete destruction of the city with its civilians. Indeed, the Ukie tactics are a form of artillery genocide. They are very concerned about losing their manpower, and that is why they simply pull up howitzers and Grad systems to our residential areas, and then pummel them, methodically devastating one district after another. Take this, for example: the Ukies almost entirely demolished Russkaya Street in Slavyansk. It looks as if the battery commander looked at his navigator, at the city map, saw the hated name, and specifically decided to level Russkaya Street.

However, there was plenty of destruction to go around for other streets as well. The scenes that I observed are indescribable in their horror: a confused 3-year old child going mad right in front of your eyes, screaming in an unnatural voice; priests performing funeral services for an entire section of an apartment block, walking around a dozen coffins set up beside the devastated homes of the deceased. It was in order to stop this monstrous Ukie “peacemaking” that the Militia Commander-in-Chief, Strelkov, decided to withdraw our forces.

And yet, there are already speculations that the Militia units left via some special “corridor” organized for them by Poroshenko. This is complete delirium. You need to understand that the blockade of Slavyansk had not yet been fully completed, and we could still leave via country roads. It is another matter that these roads were also open to artillery fire, most likely from Karachun.

That is why Igor Ivanovich gave the order for a diversion to be performed—by attacking the positions of the Ukie army with our numerically small armoured vehicle group. Our Nona and the tanks began striking at them, while, at the same time, the Militia drove toward Kramatorsk in “Ural” and “Kamaz” trucks, in microvans and cars. Some of our tankists died a heroic death; the list of their names is being confirmed, and they will be posthumously awarded Novorossiyan Orders of St. George.

Of course, we could not avoid the confusion inevitable in such a fairly large-scale operation. Having forgotten the order to maintain a blackout, some of the drivers drove with headlights turned on; they forgot to tape their headlamps. The enemy launched its drones and flare rockets. They have a huge number of drones, which I found out first-hand in a previous night time raid. As a result, the enemy was finally able to detect us, and the tail-end of our column came under Grad fire.

Personally, I was lucky—my men and I were at the head of the column and were unharmed. Although our vehicle was initially in the tail-end, later on (due to a local guide’s mistake), we were forced to turn everyone around, and our vehicle ended up at the head of the column.

Unfortunately, in the course of the artillery strike, the families of militiamen that were being evacuated to escape the punitive forces of the enemy came in harm’s way. A woman and a little girl were wounded; transport vehicles were damaged. The exact numbers of our losses during the evacuation from Slavyansk are being verified.

At the same time, it is even more offensive to hear criticism coming from many directions because any “conspiracy” with the Ukie government that was attempting to destroy us during the withdrawal is simply unimaginable. Similarly improbable are the rumours about our “enormous losses” during the redeployment of the forces. Why do you repeat Ukie lies?

In fact, overall, the operation was a resounding success for Strelkov, and, despite the difficulties (navoidable in such situations), he was able to evacuate almost the entire personnel of the Militia (over ninety percent of it), and practically all the weaponry. This is a great boon to the defence of Donetsk, and this is now our highest priority.

As for the office-plankton patriots that criticize Strelkov from afar, I can only say one thing to you: come here and demonstrate your talents on the field of battle, if you believe yourself smarter and braver than he is. We always need volunteers.

Forgive us for not dying in Slavyansk. We may yet have a chance to die in Donetsk if Russia will not help us.


Igor Druze
Advisor to the DPR Minister of Defence
in Questions of Information and Politics

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Baghdadi attacks Gulf leaders in taped sermon, world powers mull response to ISIS threat


An image grab taken from a propaganda video released on July 5, 2014 by al-Furqan Media allegedly shows the leader of the Islamic State (IS) jihadist group, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, aka Caliph Ibrahim, adressing Muslim worshippers at a mosque in the militant-held northern Iraqi city of Mosul. (Photo: AFP-al-Furqan Media)
Published Monday, July 7, 2014
There was no mention of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki in Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s speech. However, he did make a statement that Gulf leaders should not take lightly. He said: “I do not promise you prosperity and security the way kings and leaders promise their followers and subjects...” This criticism of kings and rulers translated immediately into a suicide attack carried out by terrorists in a Saudi government building in Sharurah along the borders with Yemen.
The Islamic State in Iraq and Syria’s (ISIS) war led by Baghdadi does not spare anyone, from Maliki to the Gulf leaders to Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Iran and the world. Perhaps that is why he delivered a sermon dealing with international issues, avoiding domestic Iraqi issues and speaking about victories “all over the world.”
This is the first observation. What else?
- Baghdadi’s appearance in one of the most important mosques in the city of Mosul is a painful blow to the United States, its president, its security apparatus, and NATO. The US has designated Baghdadi a terrorist since May 2011 and offered a $10 million reward for whoever helps capture him. The US should know every inch of Iraq after occupying the country and building its army. Is it possible that Baghdadi’s security and hiding methods would go undetected by the most important intelligence agencies in the world? Or is there a kind of complicity for some reason that will become evident later? Some people are suspicious of the reasons behind Baghdadi’s release from US prisons in Iraq in the first place even though US intelligence agencies were aware of the danger he represents.
- It is obvious from the precision of the videotaping that Baghdadi’s security team is highly professional. A technical and directorial team took its time to try four or five cameras and arrange the lighting and sound. Security measures were also highly professional, with all forms of communication in the mosque cut off and the use of sophisticated security devices. Everything suggested that the person coming to the mosque was an important ISIS figure. Is it possible that no one paid attention?
- Based on the few pictures distributed by US intelligence agencies and then Iraqi agencies three years ago, the man who appeared in al-Kabeer Mosque in Mosul was indeed Baghdadi. Perhaps he had the sermon recorded to discredit reports of his injury. The date the sermon was recorded is unknown, but it was probably in the past few days since he makes references to Ramadan.
- It is obvious that Baghdadi is used to public speaking. Born in 1971, the leader with an al-Qaeda-esque mentality used to preach in the mosques of Iraq and has a PhD in Islamic studies. Perhaps he wanted to show off the oratory qualities of a man, who until recently, was unknown. Using a lot of references from the Quran and the Hadith (sayings attributed to the Prophet Mohammad) was perhaps motivated by his desire not only to be persuasive but to showcase his depth of knowledge and memorization.
- Jihad, conquest and victory were the most frequently used words in his speech. Baghdadi mentioned jihad and mujahideen six or seven times. This means he has no project other than establishing the caliphate by the power of force and persuasion. He spoke about “the book that guides and the sword that brings victory.” His saying: “If you see that I am right, assist me and if you see that I am wrong, advise me,” is probably based on the speech in which Omar ibn al-Khattab Abu Bakr (the second first caliph) 
لما بويع أبو بكر بالخلافة بعد بيعة السقيفة تكلم أبو بكر، فحمد الله وأثنى عليه ثم قال

"أما بعد أيها الناس فإني قد وليت عليكم ولست بخيركم، فإن أحسنت فأعينوني، وإن أسأت فقوموني، الصدق أمانة، والكذب خيانة، والضعيف فيكم قوي عندي حتى أريح عليه حقه إن شاء الله، والقوى فيكم ضعيف حتى آخذ الحق منه إن شاء الله، لا يدع قوم الجهاد في سبيل الله إلا ضربهم الله بالذل، ولا تشيع الفاحشة في قوم قط إلا عمهم الله بالبلاء، أطيعوني ما أطعت الله ورسوله، فإذا عصيت الله ورسوله فلا طاعة لي عليكم".

Omar said: "O people, whoever among you sees any crookedness in me, let him straighten it."
 قام عمر رضي الله عنه يخطب فقال: أيها الناس من رأى منكم فيّ اعوجاجاً فليقومه، فقام له رجل وقال: والله لو رأينا فيك اعوجاجاً لقومناه بسيوفنا، فقال عمر: الحمد لله الذي جعل في هذه الأمة من يقوم اعوجاج عمر بسيفه
- Baghdadi did not say anything about his predecessors in the jihad launched by al-Qaeda. Therefore, his break with the leadership of al-Qaeda and specifically its current leader, Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri, continues with putting himself above them all. Let us remember that he refused to pledge allegiance to Zawahiri in the past and fought al-Nusra Front. Perhaps he is concerned that Sunni religious leaders, who openly rejected his leadership of Muslims, have. These concerns stem from the fact that Baghdadi asked everyone to obey him. There is no doubt that behind this concern also lies a power struggle between regional countries.
What is next?
A Russian official says: “The Russian leadership considers the takfiri terrorists currently striking in Iraq, after Syria, Moscow’s number one enemy. We experienced this kind of terrorism in Chechnya and Georgia, and bombings hit the heart of Moscow. There is no solution but to uproot it. We are seeking to form a serious international and regional front. It is the duty of the US and NATO to work in earnest for establishing a front to fight terrorism that would consist of all countries without exception. In addition, Gulf countries, primarily Saudi Arabia and Qatar, should stop arming and funding insurgents in Syria.”
Information available to Moscow indicates that there are steps in that direction on two levels. On one hand, the Russian leadership is increasing its military assistance to the Iraqi government and coordinating with Iran and Syria. On the other hand, there are contacts on an almost daily basis with the leadership in the Gulf and the West to isolate ISIS militarily, financially and politically.
The Russian and Iranian initiative still clashes with the US and NATO position that rejects the idea of intensifying military aid before an internal political agreement is reached in Iraq. This means, either keeping Maliki from heading the next government or strengthening the Sunni presence in key positions. Iran, so far, is refusing to exclude Maliki but it is open to strengthening the Sunni presence.
A European diplomat says: “A US-Iranian agreement produced a government in Lebanon in which Sunnis had a significant presence and Saudi Arabia gave its allies the green light to join the government and launch a security plan. This saved Lebanon from drowning in the fires of terrorism. Our information at the time suggested that the security situation in the country was on the verge of collapse if an internal understanding with a regional and international backing is not reached. We tried to do the same thing in Iraq but the parties’ intransigence paved the way for ISIS to step in forcefully. Now we have to quickly address what happened because the danger of terrorism reaches everyone, including Europe and the US itself.
Information from Russia and the West underscores the desire to contain ISIS before it is too late and to prevent its leaders from expanding and stabilizing its presence. There is also a desire to undermine its nurturing environment by attracting Baathists, previous officers and tribal leaders. There are contacts with Gulf countries that wield influence among the Iraqi tribes to play part of this role.
European sources recognize the difficulty of the current phase with the emergence of a takfiri group that is well-trained and equipped in a manner rarely seen among jihadist movements before. But they say: “This is the first time in the history of fighting terrorism where all the countries in the region and the world come together around the need to coordinate with each other to fight against it.” The same sources reveal that there is international security coordination on more than one level that includes Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Qatar, Yemen, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates and others irrespective of political disagreements.
Some in Europe are speaking of “security surprises coming soon” despite their concern over possible terrorist reactions that might take place against Western interests or in Western countries.
Talk of security surprises is in line with a central Iranian decision to prevent ISIS from turning Iraq into an arena for Sunni-Shia strife. Military plans are in the process of being devised with the aim of paralyzing ISIS’ ability to expand further and preventing it from reaching holy sites that are sacred to the Shia. There is no specific information about what is being worked on but close sources say: “It is not going to take too long. Some results will emerge faster than people expect.”
Some may believe that what is happening in Iraq represents a trap for Iran that will prompt it to make compromises on the nuclear issue and in Syria and Iraq. But a previous European diplomat who specializes in Shia and Iranian affairs said: “Tehran has the kind of patience that allows it to withstand shocks like these and turn them into its favor. It is neither in the US nor Iranian interest to undermine the current nuclear understanding. In addition, the sectarian balance in the Gulf between the Shia and the Sunnis and the presence of most oil reserves among the Shia of Iran and the Gulf contradict claims about the victory of one side over another. Besides, the threat to the Strait of Hormuz is ongoing.”
The European diplomat is certain that US President Barack Obama cannot use Iraq to put pressure on Iran regardless of how much Israel and the Gulf put pressure on him. The reason is that terrorism has come to represent a grave danger to the interests of the US, the Gulf and Israel itself. Besides, the decline in the popularity of the US president domestically can become disastrous if terrorist attacks take place against US interests or on US soil. Obama, who boasted of killing Osama bin Laden in the spring of 2011, finds himself today facing a figure perhaps more dangerous, more bloody and more ambitious to establish the caliphate than al-Qaeda’s late leader himself.
This article is an edited translation from the Arabic Edition.

Related

خيوط اللعبة | البغدادي هاجم الملوك لا المالكي: مفاجآت عراقية قريبة؟

لم يذكر أبو بكر البغدادي في خطبته رئيس الوزراء العراقي نوري المالكي. أورد، في المقابل، جملة ينبغي أن يتوقف عندها قادة الخليج بتمعن. قال: «إني لا أَعِدُكُم كما يَعِد الملوك والحكام أتباعهم ورعيتهم من رفاهية وأمن...». هذا الانتقاد للملوك والحكّام تُرجم فوراً بهجوم انتحاري نفّذه إرهابيان في مبنى حكومي سعودي في منطقة شرورة عند الحدود مع اليمن.
معركة «داعش» بقيادة البغدادي إذاً لا تستثني أحداً، من المالكي إلى قادة الخليج، إلى لبنان وسوريا والأردن وإيران والعالم. لعله، لذلك، أرادها خطبة أممية إسلامية وتجنّب التفاصيل العراقية الداخلية. تحدث عن نصر في «مشارق الأرض ومغاربها».
هذه الملاحظة الأولى. ماذا أيضاً؟
ــــ ظهور البغدادي في أهم مساجد الموصل صفعة مؤلمة لأميركا ورئيسها وأجهزة استخباراتها والأطلسي. منذ تشرين الأول 2011 وسمته أميركا بالإرهابي، وعرضت مكافأة 10 ملايين دولار لمن يساعد في القبض عليه. من المفترض أن أميركا تعرف كل زاوية وشارع في العراق بعد احتلالها له وتركيب جيشه. هل يُعقل أن البغدادي يملك من وسائل الأمن والتخفي ما عجزت عن كشفه أهم استخبارات العالم؟ أم أن في الأمر تواطؤاً لأهداف ستظهر لاحقاً؟ ثمة من يشكّك أصلاً في أسباب إطلاق سراح البغدادي من السجون الأميركية في العراق، رغم معرفة الاستخبارات الأميركية بخطورته.
ــــ واضح من خلال دقة التصوير أن أمن البغدادي بالغ الاحتراف. ثمة فريق تقني وإخراجي أخذ كل وقته ليجرب أربع أو خمس كاميرات، ويرتّب الإضاءة والصوت. إجراءات الحماية تميّزت باحترافية عالية. قطع كل الاتصالات ونشر الأمن مع أجهزة دقيقة. كل شيء كان يوحي بأن القادم إلى المسجد شخصية داعشية كبيرة ومهمة. هل يعقل أن أحداً لم ينتبه؟
ــــ وفق الصور القليلة التي وزعتها الاستخبارات الأميركية، ثم العراقية، قبل 3 سنوات، فإن الذي ظهر في المسجد الكبير في الموصل هو فعلاً البغدادي. فقط تاريخ تسجيل الخطبة غير معروف، لكنه على الأرجح في الأيام القليلة الماضية. ربما أراد تكذيب خبر إصابته. استهلال الخطبة بالحديث عن رمضان يؤكد التاريخ.
ــــ واضح أيضاً أن البغدادي معتادٌ الخطابة. فالقيادي «القاعدي» الفكر، والمولود عام 1971، كان خطيباً في مساجد العراق وحاصلاً على دكتوراه في الدراسات الإسلامية. لعله أراد من خطبته إظهار هذه الشخصية الخطابية لرجل كان حتى الأمس القريب مجهولاً. ولعل الإكثار من الإسناد القرآني والأحاديث فيه رغبة، ليس فقط بالإقناع، بل في إظهار التعمق والحفظ.
ــــــ الجهاد والفتح والنصر كانت الكلمات الأكثر حضوراً. يمكن إحصاء 6 أو 7 مرات ذكر فيها الجهاد والمجاهدين. هذا يعني أن لا مشاريع عنده غير إقامة الخلافة بالقوة والإقناع. تحدث عن «كتاب يُهدي، وسيف ينصر». أما قوله: «فإن رأيتموني على حق فأعينوني وإن رأيتموني على باطل فانصحوني...»، فهو على الأرجح يستند إلى خطبة عمر بن الخطاب (أبو بكر) حين قال: «أيها الناس من رأى منكم فيّ اعوجاجاً فليقوِّمه ...».
ــــ لم يذكر البغدادي شيئاً عمن سبقوه في رحلة الجهاد «القاعدي». هو يكمل بذلك إذاً رحلة القطيعة مع قيادة تنظيم «القاعدة»، وسيّدها الحالي الدكتور أيمن الظواهري، ويضع نفسه فوق الجميع. لنتذكر أنه رفض سابقاً مبايعة الظواهري وحارب «النصرة». لعل في الأمر ما بدأ يقلق قيادات دينية سنية تجاهر حالياً برفض خلافته على المسلمين. القلق يكمن في أن البغدادي طالب الجميع بإطاعته. لا شك في أن خلف هذا القلق يكمن صراع نفوذ أيضاً بين دول إقليمية.
ماذا بعد؟
يقول مسؤول روسي «إن القيادة الروسية تعتبر أن الإرهاب التكفيري الذي يضرب العراق حالياً، بعد سوريا، هو العدو الأول لموسكو. نحن جرّبنا هذا الإرهاب في الشيشان وجورجيا، ووصلت التفجيرات إلى قلب موسكو. لا حل إذاً إلا باقتلاعه من جذوره. ونحن نسعى إلى تشكيل جبهة جدية دولية وإقليمية، ونؤكد أن من واجب أميركا والأطلسي العمل جدياً على تسريع تشكيل هذه الجبهة التي تضم كل الدول من دون استثناء لمحاربة الإرهاب. كذلك على دول الخليج، وفي مقدمها السعودية وقطر، وقف كل تسليح أو تمويل للمسلحين في سوريا».




يبدو من خلال المعلومات المتوافرة في موسكو حالياً أن الخطوات تتسارع في هذا السياق على مستويين. من جهة، تكثّف القيادة الروسية مساعداتها العسكرية للحكومة العراقية وتنسّق مع إيران وسوريا. ومن جهة ثانية تجري اتصالات شبه يومية مع قيادات خليجية وغربية لتطويق «داعش» عسكرياً ومالياً وسياسياً.
الخطوات الروسية والإيرانية لا تزال تصطدم بموقف أميركي ــــ أطلسي يقول بأن لا تكثيف للمساعدات العسكرية قبل اتفاق سياسي داخلي في العراق. المقصود بهذا الاتفاق هو: إما إبعاد نوري المالكي عن رئاسة الحكومة المقبلة، أو تعزيز الحضور السني في المفاصل الأساسية. إيران، حتى الآن، ترفض إبعاد المالكي، ولكنها منفتحة على تعزيز الحضور السني.
يقول دبلوماسي أوروبي: «الاتفاق الإيراني ــــ الأميركي أنتج حكومة في لبنان كان للسنّة فيها حضور جيد، والسعودية أعطت آنذاك الضوء الأخضر لحلفائها في لبنان للدخول إلى الحكومة والشروع في الخطة الأمنية. هذا جنّب لبنان غرقاً في أتون الإرهاب. كانت معلوماتنا آنذاك تؤكد أن الوضع اللبناني مرشح لانهيار أمني جدي ما لم يحصل تفاهم داخلي بغطاء إقليمي ــــ دولي. حاولنا أن نفعل الشيء نفسه في العراق، لكن تعنّت الأطراف مهد الطريق لدخول «داعش» بقوة على الخط. الآن علينا أن نعالج سريعاً ما حصل لأن خطر الإرهاب يطاول الجميع، بما في ذلك أوروبا وأميركا نفسها».
تقاطع المعلومات الروسية والغربية، يشير إلى رغبة في تطويق «داعش» قبل فوات الأوان، وعدم السماح لقادتها بالتمدد والاستقرار، ورغبة أخرى بتفكيك بيئتها الحاضنة عبر اجتذاب بعثيين وضباط سابقين وزعماء عشائر. ثمة اتصالات مع دول خليجية لها تأثير على العشائر للعب جزء من هذا الدور.
تعترف الأوساط الأوروبية بصعوبة المرحلة أمام تيار تكفيري مدرب ومجهز على نحو قل نظيره بين التيارات الجهادية. لكنها تقول: «هذه هي المرة الأولى في تاريخ محاربة الإرهاب التي تلتقي فيها كل الدول الإقليمية والدولية حول ضرورة التنسيق لمكافحته». تكشف الأوساط نفسها أن تنسيقاً أمنياً دولياً يجري على أكثر من خط ويشمل إيران وتركيا والسعودية وسوريا وقطر واليمن والكويت والإمارات وغيرها بغض النظر عن الصراعات السياسية.
ثمة من بات في أوروبا يتحدث عن «مفاجآت أمنية قريبة»، رغم القلق من ردود الفعل الإرهابية التي قد تحصل ضد مصالح غربية أو على أراضٍ غربية.
ينسجم الكلام عن مفاجآت أمنية مع القرار الإيراني المركزي بمنع «داعش» من تحويل العراق إلى الساحة الكبرى للفتنة السنية ــــ الشيعية. ثمة خطط عسكرية بوشر بوضعها بهدف شل قدرات «داعش» عن التوسع أكثر، ومنعه من الوصول إلى العتبات الشيعية المقدسة. لا معلومات دقيقة عمّا يجري العمل عليه، لكن الأوساط القريبة تقول: «لن يتأخر الأمر كثيراً، وسيظهر بعض النتائج بأسرع مما يتوقع البعض».
إذا كان البعض يرى في ما يحصل في العراق فخاً كبيراً لإيران سيدفعها إلى تقديم تنازلات نووية وفي سوريا والعراق، فإن دبلوماسياً أوروبياً سابقاً متخصصاً بملف الشيعة وإيران، يقول «إن لدى طهران من النفس الطويل ما يجعلها تهضم صدمات كهذه ثم تحوّلها لمصلحتها. وليس من مصلحة أميركا ولا إيران ضرب التفاهم النووي الحالي. ثم إن التوازن العددي المذهبي في الخليج بين الشيعة والسنة، ووجود معظم الآبار النفطية عند شيعة إيران والخليج يناقض مقولات انتصار فريق على آخر. تماماً كما أن الخطر على مضيق هرمز يبقى قائماً دائماً».
الدبلوماسي الأوروبي جازم لجهة القول إن باراك أوباما لا يستطيع مطلقاً استخدام العراق للضغط على إيران مهما ارتفعت نسبة الضغط الإسرائيلي أو الخليجي عليه. السبب هو أن الإرهاب بات كبير الخطر على مصالح أميركا والخليج وإسرائيل نفسها. ثم إن الانهيار الكبير في شعبية الرئيس الأميركي داخلياً قد يصبح كارثياً لو وقعت عمليات إرهابية ضد المصالح الأميركية أو على الأراضي الأميركية، إذ إن أوباما الذي تباهى بقتل أسامة بن لادن في ربيع 2011، يجد نفسه اليوم أمام شخص ربما كان يفوق زعيم القاعدة الراحل بأشواط، خطورةً ودمويةً وطموحاً إلى إقامة الخلافة.

مقالات أخرى لسامي كليب

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!