Tuesday, 2 December 2014

Lebanon’s negotiations with al-Nusra: How Ali Bazzal’s execution was postponed


Family members of the kidnapped soldiers erect posters of their loved ones in Downtown Beirut. Al-Akhbar/Marwan Tahtah
Published Monday, December 1, 2014
For the second time, Sheikh Mustafa Hujairi (Abu Taqiyyi) has succeeded in stopping the execution of the captive Lebanese army soldier Ali Bazzal. His mediation has so far resulted in the release of 13 hostages, and in stopping the execution of the abductee twice. Thus, once again, the government has decided to put him in charge of the [prisoner exchange] negotiations file. But for Hujairi, not much has changed. In all cases, representatives of the government and the Qatari-Syrian envoy turn to him for both minute and major issues.
Hujairi told Al-Akhbar,
“There should not be any more temporary solutions. The government must commit to its pledges to ensure the release of the soldiers.”
“As of today, the phase of stalling must end,” he said, adding that “those holding the prisoners captive have made up their minds, and this is the last chance.”
At sunset last Friday, November 28, Hujairi headed to the outskirts [of Ersal]. The general atmosphere indicated that the “al-Nusra Front” was serious in its threats to kill the captive soldier Ali Bazzal, and that mediation with the group’s leaders would not dissuade them [from their decision].
“The issue is not that simple. Someone should have [attempted to] contact them,” he said on his way to the barren area where the “al-Nusra” militants are holed up.
After 6 pm, the army blocks all entry to the barren area. After a quarter of an hour of waiting at the army checkpoint, and mediation, Hujairi was allowed to pass.
He said,
“I decided to go personally because I knew that a disaster was imminent, and that I might be able to do something.”
He noted that he waited for hours before he was allowed to meet with Abu Malik al-Talli, al-Nusra Front’s emir [in the Syrian Qalamoun region].
In the meeting with al-Talli,
“we started to suggest options and alternatives. I expressed my point of view that the government will not possibly accept to release Joumana Hamid in particular, as it may be beyond its power since the latter has been mentioned by Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah personally. He suggested that we choose another name, and the discussion dragged on as to who this person would be. The main focus in the negotiation was to stop the execution of Bazzal in return for a declared formal commitment from the government to hold negotiations.
I told him,
‘if [the government] does not fulfill [its pledges], do whatever you want.’ Phone calls by politicians poured in, namely by Minister Wael Abu Faour, who has been closely following the negotiations.”
Hujairi said that
“the condition to stopping the execution was to start direct negotiations without any delay,”
adding that
“the government only issued a statement after agreeing with al-Nusra on it.”
Have the negotiations started, or have they not? In the midst of hearsay, the truth has been lost. Who is procrastinating? Who bears the responsibility?
Government representatives say that “the kidnappers have not handed over the list of names yet,” while “al-Nusra sources claim that “although the full lists have not been submitted, the government representative has received lists of names and was filmed during the receipt.”
According to the sources, this
“proves the bad faith of the government, because if it was serious, it would have immediately started to negotiate names that would not cause controversy.”
Sources from al-Nusra confirm that “Ali Bazzal was taken [to a location] where he was going to be slaughtered once the deadline had passed.” Will al-Nusra Front believe the Lebanese government’s promises this time?
According to the sources,
“in its statement issued after midnight, the government pledged commitment… If it sticks to its [pledge], we will do the same. Otherwise, Ali and his colleagues are still in our custody.”
As for the course of the negotiations, the sources assert that
“no negotiations have been held since they were halted… and the Qatari mediator only acted like a postman who conveys news.”
They confirmed that
“Abu Taqiyyi will resume negotiations from where they stopped a few months ago,” noting that “if a negotiator does not have cards and names to negotiate on, they will fail.”
The sources revealed that the General Emir of al-Nusra Front Abu Mohammed al-Golani personally intervened to request the execution of Bazzal.
They said that
“everything that is happening in the negotiations is a message to Hezbollah.”
The sources confirm that the release of Hezbollah’s hostage was not in return for just two captives from the Free Syrian Army (FSA).” They added,
“Hezbollah members kidnapped relatives of an FSA leader living in Lebanon and threatened him, so he was forced to respond.”
The meeting of the crisis cell in charge of the soldiers’ file was announced one hour after the end of the session. However, the meeting, which saw intensive discussions, did not result in a clear, decisive position on the negotiations.
Ministerial sources said that “the lack of seriousness by the Qatari envoy prompted the government to search for other channels,” noting that
“the Qatari envoy promised to come three days ago, but he hasn’t showed up yet, and there is no positive indication regarding his role.”
They added that “communication with the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has been cut off, and al-Nusra appears to be confused about adding new names to the list,” although Bazzal’s father received a threat yesterday [November 30] afternoon that his son would be executed if the government does not begin to negotiate.
The ministerial sources confirmed that “the majority of the committee members are in favor of holding negotiations under the law, i.e., [they oppose] the release of dangerous wanted persons. While Abu Faour has demanded holding immediate negotiations irrespective of the names of the wanted persons, and reaching a speedy settlement at any price, Interior Minister Nouhad al-Machnouk called for not yielding to the pressure of the kidnappers.
Follow Radwan Mortada on Twitter: @radwanmortada
This article is an edited translation from the Arabic Edition.
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

HITLER’S DEPUTY RUDOLF HESS ‘MURDERED BY BRITISH AGENTS’ TO STOP HIM SPILLING WARTIME SECRETS

by Cahal Milmo, The Independent

Scotland Yard was given the names of British agents who allegedly murdered the Nazi Rudolf Hess in the infamous Spandau Prison but was advised by prosecutors not to pursue its investigations, according to a newly-released police report.

Written two years after Hess’s death in 1987, the classified document outlines a highly-sensitive inquiry into the claims of a British surgeon who had once treated Adolf Hitler’s deputy that, rather than taking his own life, the elderly Nazi was killed on British orders to preserve wartime secrets.

Released under the Freedom of Information Act, the partially-redacted report by Detective Chief Superintendent Howard Jones revealed that the surgeon – Hugh Thomas – had supplied him with the names of two suspects provided by a “government employee” responsible for training secret agents.

Withheld for nearly 25 years, the report has been released by the Yard’s counter-terrorism command following consultation with “other Government and foreign government departments”.

The death of Hess in Berlin at the age of 93 after he apparently hung himself with a wire flex in a summer house in the grounds of Spandau has long been controversial with claims that he was too infirm to commit suicide and a farewell note to his family had in fact been written 20 years earlier.

The Yard was called in in 1989 after Mr Thomas, an eminent former military surgeon previously based in Spandau, claimed in a book that “Hess” was in fact an impostor sent by the Nazis to Britain in 1941 and his murder was carried out by two British assassins disguised as American serviceman.

In his subsequent 11-page report, Mr Jones said the surgeon had “confidentially imparted” the names of two alleged suspects passed to him by an informant who was a former member of the SAS and had since taken on a role “training people for undercover or spying operations”.

Prior to his death, speculation had been growing that Hess might be released because a long-standing veto by the Soviet Union, which for decades had insisted on a severe regime for Hess, including forcing him to wash his hands in toilet bowl, might be reversed by Mikhail Gorbachev.

Mr Jones wrote: “[Mr Thomas] had received information that two assassins had been ordered on behalf of the British Government to kill Hess in order that he should not be released and free to expose secrets concerning the plot to overthrow the Churchill government.”

The officer found there was not “much substance” to Mr Thomas’s claims of murder but suggested that efforts should be made to trace and interview the alleged killers along with other witnesses to ensure the matter could be “comprehensively adjudged” to have been fully investigated.

It is not known if the two suspects were tracked down after the report was submitted to the Crown Prosecution Service in May 1989.

But within six months the investigation was declared closed after the then Director of Public of Prosecutions, Sir Allan Green QC, advised that further inquiries were not necessary.
In November 1989, Sir Nicholas Lyell, the solicitor general, told Parliament: “The inquiries carried out by Detective Chief Superintendent Jones have produced no cogent evidence to suggest that Rudolf Hess was murdered; nor, on the view of the Director of Public Prosecutions, is there any basis for further investigation.”

The unannounced arrival of Hess in Britain was one of the strangest incidents of the Second World War and remains the subject of extensive debate about its motivation, including whether it was an ill-judged attempt to unseat Winston Churchill by enlisting aristocrats with Nazi sympathies.

After flying solo to Scotland in 1941, Hitler’s deputy fuhrer parachuted to the ground and, after being taken into custody at pitchfork-point by an astonished ploughman, declared his intention to negotiate a peace with Britain to form an alliance against Stalin’s Soviet Union.
Hess was sentenced to life imprisonment as a war criminal at the Nuremberg Trials and incarcerated in Spandau along with other prominent Nazis including Albert Speer. From 1966 onwards, Hitler’s deputy – whose Allied guards were required to only address him as Prisoner Seven – was the sole inmate in the 600-cell prison.

Further doubt was claimed to have been cast last year on the circumstances of Hess’s suicide when photographs emerged of the summer house where he died, showing the short distance – some 5ft – between the cord from which he was found hanging and the floor.

His son, Wolf, had previously insisted that the height was insufficient for his father, crippled by arthritis, to hang himself and added to post mortem examination evidence suggesting a full noose had been placed around his neck.

In his report, Mr Jones dismissed such concerns, saying expert advice showed Hess’s injuries were consistent with an “unusual hanging situation”.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Monday, 1 December 2014

Gaza's pregnant women suffer


In labor and finding the pain unbearable, Asmaa Faraj, a 26-year-old mother, was unable to deliver her first baby in a hospital. Instead, her mother took control of the situation and helped her give birth at home during the recent Israeli war on Gaza.

“The shelling was heavy on the night of July 18. Going to a hospital was a great risk. My family could not flee the house, so we remained there, to keep my baby safe. We tried to call the ambulance to pick us up and take us to a health center, but they were all busy with the wounded,” Asmaa told Al-Monitor. She said she had no other choice but to let her inexperienced mother help her to deliver.

Asmaa’s mother, in her 50s, said she had never imagined that she would have to help her daughter give birth someday, as she had never before delivered a baby. “I used a kitchen knife to cut the umbilical cord and threads from clothing to stitch up the wound. There were great risks, but I pulled it off,” she said.

While Asmaa was lucky enough to hold her first child, whom she named Bakr, in her arms, Rasha Abu Awdah was not. She died, at the age of 30, two hours after her baby was delivered.

Abu Awdah’s husband, Nidal, told Al-Monitor, “My wife had gone through hard times when she was pregnant with our baby. Our house was bombed while we were inside. Although we miraculously survived, my wife suffered severe bleeding as a result of the bombing and underwent emergency surgery in al-Awda Hospital, north of Gaza. Doctors managed to save the baby, but she did not survive.” Rasha left behind six children in addition to the newborn infant, who opened its eyes for the first time in the arms of its aunt, who is raising him.
According to Sawsan Hamad, head of the Women and Children's Health Department at the Ministry of Health in Gaza, “About 250 women died during the Israeli war, 16 of whom were pregnant, in addition to four others who died because of complications after birth and lack of necessary health services. This is not to mention that 500 pregnant women were wounded because of the shelling and displacement.” Hamad added, “These figures are not final. These were the cases we could count, but the figures seem to be much greater. Reproduction clinics for women were severely affected. Most health services for women as well as family planning clinics were disrupted.”

A study by the National Program for the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) reported, “Six maternity units suspended their operations due to the destruction of the hospitals.” In addition, only 50% of primary health care centers were in operation during the war, because of destruction and workers not being able to reach their places of employment. Moreover, pregnancy care services declined by more than 70% during the month of July, with the intensification of Israeli military actions. Family planning services also declined by 60-90% for the same period. According to Hamad, doctors were unable to attend to patients at the few health centers that remained operable because they were busy treating the wounded.

Maryam Shaqoura, head of the Women’s Health Center in Gaza, stressed that pregnant women were subjected to risks during the war, due to the lack of necessary services and care, that increased the chances of abortion, premature birth or complications after birth. In light of the security situation, pregnant women did not have the chance to go for check-ups and follow-ups at reproduction centers.

“They had to walk long distances and carry heavy things due to displacement. This is not to mention the bombing of hospitals and unavailability of doctors, who were preoccupied with treating the wounded. Women’s special health services and care were absent before and after birth, in addition to a lack of proper food for women and newborn infants,” Shaqoura told Al-Monitor. She said that some of the women who managed to give birth in hospitals or private clinics did not spend enough time there to receive the necessary health services, as they were forced to evacuate immediately after the birth, which put them in great danger.

The UN study reported, “Maternity units in hospitals were used to treat the large numbers of wounded, which led to the decline in services provided for pregnant women. Women were evicted from hospitals immediately after giving birth, even in the case of Caesarean sections.” According to Shaqoura, dozens of pregnant women gave birth in shelters without receiving proper health care and in rooms accommodating tens of displaced people.

Shaqoura explained, “Moreover, pregnant women lacked the proper and adequate amounts of food necessary after giving birth. They used to eat one kind of food without any meat included, which was provided by local and international institutions for the displaced. This increased their chances of suffering from malnutrition.”

The war may be over, but the effects continue to be felt.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Menace of hypocrisy: Neocon propagandist frets over Russia’s ‘weaponization of information’

Reuters / Lucas Jackson
Reuters / Lucas Jackson

Maidhc Ó Cathail, for RT
Published time: November 26, 2014 10:36

There was a strong whiff of hypocrisy in the Washington air on November 13 when the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) hosted a discussion of a report entitled ‘The Menace of Unreality: How the Kremlin Weaponizes Information, Culture, and Money’.

The Menace of Unreality is co-authored by Michael Weiss, editor-in-chief of the Interpreter, and Peter Pomerantsev, author of a forthcoming book asserting that Putin’s Russia is a post-modern dictatorship.

Introducing the discussion, NED’s Christopher Walker noted that the US Congress-funded Endowment hadn’t been involved in the production of the report but that it does have “close ties” to Weiss’s online journal and the New York-based think tank that funds it, the Institute of Modern Russia (IMR).

In the course of their report’s self-righteous criticism of the widespread “opaqueness” about who funds think tanks, Weiss and Pomerantsev disclose, in an aside, that their work is “funded by a think tank that receives support from the family of Mikhail 
Khodorkovsky.” Their critique of the weaponization of money, however, neglects to mention its funder’s conviction for embezzlement and money laundering.

Peter Pomerantsev, author of a forthcoming book asserting that Putin’s Russia is a post-modern dictatorship (Screenshot from youtube.com)
Peter Pomerantsev, author of a forthcoming book asserting that Putin’s Russia is a post-modern dictatorship (Screenshot from youtube.com)

In Washington, Weiss and Pomerantsev were joined in the discussion of their “counter-disinformation”report by an analyst from the Foreign Policy Initiative, a neoconservative advocacy group founded by Robert Kagan and William Kristol, whose earlier Project for a New American Century had played a key role in pushing the lies that led to the US invasion of Iraq.

Inside the report’s cover, which features a reader oblivious to the fact that the broadsheet he’s reading is going up in flames, the Interpreter says it “aspires to dismantle the language barrier that separates journalists, Russia analysts, policymakers, diplomats and interested laymen in the English-speaking world from the debates, scandals, intrigues and political developments taking place in the Russian Federation.”

The similarity between the Interpreter’s stated aspirations and those of the pro-Israel Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) may be more than coincidental. As the liberal Jewish blogger Richard Silverstein observed about a blog in the Telegraph by the Interpreter’s editor-in-chief, “a number of Weiss’claims are based on the notoriously unreliable MEMRI,” which itself claims to bridge “the language gap between the West and the Middle East and South Asia.”

Michael Weiss, editor-in-chief of the Interpreter (Screenshot from youtube.com)
Michael Weiss, editor-in-chief of the Interpreter (Screenshot from youtube.com)

The bio that precedes that June 2011 Weiss blog describes him as “the Research Director of The Henry Jackson Society, a foreign policy think tank, as well as the co-chair of its Russia Studies Centre.”

In addition to a who’s who of neocon luminaries like Kagan and Kristol, the Henry Jackson Society’sinternational patrons include Ambassador Dore Gold, former permanent representative of Israel to the United Nations, and Natan Sharansky, chair of the executive of the Jewish Agency for Israel.

Weiss’s previous employment at the UK-based, pro-Israel advocacy organization, however, is conspicuously absent from the lengthy “About the Authors” section at the end of the IMR-published, anti-Russia report.

His updated bio, however, reveals that Weiss’ concerns haven’t changed much since his HJS days.

“Weiss has covered the Syrian revolution from its inception, reporting from refugee camps in southern Turkey and from the frontlines of war-torn Aleppo,” the IMR report notes.

A member of al Qaeda's Nusra Front poses with the Nusra flag on top of an infantry fighting vehicle at the frontline near al-Zahra village, north of Aleppo city, November 25, 2014 (Reuters / Abdalrhman Ismail)
A member of al Qaeda's Nusra Front poses with the Nusra flag on top of an infantry fighting vehicle at the frontline near al-Zahra village, north of Aleppo city, November 25, 2014 (Reuters / Abdalrhman Ismail)

As a profile of the neocon Henry Jackson Society observes, its members have been “active proponents of Western intervention in Syria’s civil war.” It singles out a March 2012 piece in the New York Times by Weiss advocating that the US “begin marshaling a coalition for regime change in Syria consisting of countries” like “Britain, France, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey.”

In an interview with the Jerusalem Post last year, Israel’s previous ambassador to the US Michael Oren admitted that Tel Aviv “always wanted [President] Bashar Assad to go.”
Likewise, one suspects that Weiss’ “set of modest recommendations” on how the West should confront Russia’s supposed “weaponization of information” is motivated at least in part by the challenge Russian media such as RT poses to the monopoly over the narrative of the Syrian conflict coveted by hisinterventionist friends in the Western media.
Maidhc Ó Cathail, for RT

Maidhc Ó Cathail is a widely-published writer and political analyst. He is also the creator and editor of the Passionate Attachment blog, which focuses primarily on the US-Israeli relationship.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Sisi Sees New Future for Egypt after Mubarak Verdict


Al-Manar

Egypt President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi has said Egypt will never return to the past and is charting a new future, after a court dismissed murder charges against former leader Hosni Mubarak.

Sisi
A Cairo court on Saturday dropped the charges over the deaths of hundreds of protesters during the 2011 uprising that ended three decades of autocratic Mubarak rule.

Seven of his security commanders, including feared former interior minister Habib al-Adly, were also acquitted over the deaths of some of the roughly 800 people killed during the revolt.

Corruption charges against Mubarak's sons Alaa and Gamal were also dropped.

In a statement issued late on Sunday, Sisi said "the new Egypt, which emerged from the January 25 and June 30 revolutions, is on a path to establish a modern democratic state based on justice, freedom, equality and a renunciation of corruption".

"It is on an aspirational path to the future and can never go back to the past."

Sisi said he had instructed Prime Minister Ibrahim Mahlab to review the provisions for compensation for the families of "martyrs and those wounded in the revolution".

Source: Websites
01-12-2014 - 13:12 Last updated 01-12-2014 - 13:12


Related Videos

 تبرئة مبارك وتداعياتها على الساحة المصرية | الكوثر


 تبرئة مبارك وردود الفعل


Related Articles


River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

50 ISIL Terrorists Killed in Kobani in 24 Hours


Terrorists Killed Local Editor

At least 50 ISIL terrorists have been killed in the past 24 hours in clashes, suicide bombings and US-led air strikes in Syria's Kobani, a monitor said Sunday.

The opposing UK-based Syrian Observatory said the number of deaths was one of the highest daily tolls for the terrorist group since it launched an assault on the strategic town on the Turkish border in September.

The monitoring group said at least five of those killed were suicide bomb attackers, two of them involved in attacks on the border crossing that separates Kobani from Turkey.

Another 11 were killed in clashes that ensued between Kobani's Kurdish defenders and the 'jihadists' at the border after the bombings, but there was no breakdown for the remaining toll.

The group also said 11 Kurdish fighters were killed in the same period in Kobani, along with one Syrian rebel fighter backing the Kurdish forces.

ISIL began advancing on Kobani on September 16, hoping to quickly seize the small border town and secure its grip on a large stretch of the Syrian-Turkish border.

At one point, it looked set to overrun the town, but Kurdish Syrian fighters, backed by US-led coalition air strikes and an influx of Iraqi Kurdish peshmerga forces, have held back the group.

For now, the town remains roughly evenly divided between ISIL and Kurdish control.
Source: AFP
30-11-2014 - 13:21 Last updated 30-11-2014 - 13:21




River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

SYRPER EXCLUSIVE: WHAT LAVROV IS TELLING MU’ALLEM; WHAT MU’ALLEM IS TELLING PUTIN AND LAVROV


The Foreign Minister and Minister for Expatriates of the Syrian Arab Republic, Mr. Waleed Al-Mu’allim, is in Sochi to meet with Russian President, Vladimir Putin, and Russian F.M., Sergei Lavrov.  The meeting is face-to-face which required the Syrian top diplomat to fly to Russia.  You can assume that the reasons for the trip have to do with secrecy, confidential exchanges of information and the need to prevent Western eavesdropping.  This meeting could be the most important of the entire war in Syria.
Pay no attention to press conferences or summaries offered up by both sides to the talks at the end.  This meeting is not about publicity or orotund denunciations of terrorism.  Both countries have staked out clear positions on ISIS, American meddling and the incessant violations of international law by the West, its troglodyte Arabian allies, and the Zionist Apartheid State.
Russia remains mildly interested in a negotiated end to the fighting in Syria which will see Dr. Assad continue his stewardship for at least another 7 years but which might involve a reconfiguration of the Syrian governmental structure so as to accommodate new elements from the expatriate opposition.  The Russians have to know with whom Damascus would negotiate and whom Damascus fiercely rejects.  Neither the Syrians nor the Russians will brook any surprises.
The Syrian FM is there to give them a list of groups and personalities Damascus finds acceptable in order to have a realistic political framework in which to negotiate.  My readers already appear to sense that Ahmad Mu’aadh Al-Khateeb (Al-Hasani), a former head of NACOSROF, will be on the short list especially in light of recent pronouncements he has made in support of the Assad Administration and its fight against terrorism.
Al-Khateeb is important because of his religious affiliations; he hails from a wealthy clerical Damascene class whose Sunni credentials are impeccable and deeply rooted in the life of the capital.
There is also a hope that Dr. Haytham Al-Mannaa’ will see his way to resolving his irrational differences with the Assad government and, at the very least, endorse the talks.
His track record in condemning the use of violence and in criticizing the Saudis/Qataris has been quite laudable.  His prestige rooted in pacifistic principles will gain him much gravity if the talks are ever held with him contributing.  That he is a successful physician practicing in France is another plus since his personal financial situation has obviated the necessity of falling into the gilded cage of crude Wahhabist briberies.
Michel Kilo is another Syrian dissident who will be on the list.  Kilo is a Kolakovskian-style communist who has written editorials mostly critical of the Ba’ath Party while playing a never-ending cat-and-mouse game with our security services.
In general, he is a non-violent advocate for change and has played a critical role in keeping the expatriate opposition a good whiff away from the reeking stench of the Muslim Brotherhood.  He represents a secular and progressive Weltanschauung acceptable to the Ba’ath.  More than that, I cannot say, since I am not at liberty to do so.  One particularly awful affiliation of his which would militate against his inclusion is the fact that SyrPer Liar of the Year Nominee and British catamite, Raami ‘Abdul-Rahmaan of SOHR, counts himself a Kilo-watt, ahem, an admirer of Kilo.
Another might be Nizaar Nayyoof, an Alawite critic of his coreligionists’ political role in Syria, who would also be acceptable if his health allowed him to participate in intense and serious negotiations.
Suhayr Al-Ataasi, of a landed Syrian-Turkish family from Homs, might also be an acceptable addition if you can get her away from an hairdresser for more than an hour.
Personalities like George Sabra, an avowed communist atheist, whom the Arabian apes thought would assuage the anxieties of minorities is absolutely unacceptable. 
George Sabra (a/k/a Captain Kangaroo) stares at another pipe-dream in which he has no role. This criminal actually fought to have Nusra treated as a non-terroristic liberation movement. 
His tirades against the government, his mercenary style, his praise of terroristic atrocities in Syria make him persona non grata.  He will have to sit this one out in some squalid hotel in a hardscrabble quarter of Istanbul.
Others who are unacceptable are the MB favorite, Ghassan Hitto; the bloated hog francophile, Burhaan “Le Pipe” Ghalyoon;  Kamaal Labwaani (who promised the Zionists recognition and the whole Golan if they would help to unseat Dr. Assad); ‘Abdul-Baasit Seedaa (his sleep-inducing style of oratory is absolutely unacceptable);  Haytham Al-Maalih who will face a death sentence if he ever sets foot in Syria.
Al-Maalih actually described how he would torture the Assads if they ever fell into his old, ugly, wrinkled paws. 
Another reject is Ahmad Jarbaa, the former and present pimp, embezzler and extortionist who sleeps in Saudi beds with Eastern European boys.
Mr. Mu’allim is also in Russia to find out how things are playing out in the Ukraine and how that might impact on Russia’s posture on Syria.  SyrPer has the opinion of an astute political analyst in Moscow who has asked that his name not be used in this article.  While I shy away from such treatments of sources, I also have to acknowledge that both my sources in Syria, Wael and Monzer, are also using false monikers.  So, let’s call my Muscovite source, Anatoly.
Anatoly says that Putin is going to make it clear to Mr. Mu’allim that Russia not only stands behind Dr. Assad’s government, but will view Syria, for the foreseeable future, as a state with a “mutual defense pact” binding it to Moscow.  Anatoly also thinks that Russia does not share the Syrian state’s acquiescent, “wishy-washy” view of U.S. air attacks on ISIS.  Russia does not believe the attacks are effective and, moreover, sees them as contributing to a western-inspired depiction of the government in Damascus as illegitimate.  (Readers might note that some Syrian publications have hinted at a renewal of U.S.-Syrian diplomatic ties in the near future).
Moscow has tried in vain to coerce Washington into coordinating air strikes over Syria with Damascus.  Failing that, Russia employed a slick ruse that would take the matter up at the U.N.S.C. where American violations of Syrian air space could be used to further embarrass the Obama regime internationally.  With the Syrians balking at the idea – their view being that any strikes against ISIS can’t be all bad – the Russians feel they have no standing to raise the rebuke.  That Dr. Al-Ja’afari has not railed against American trespasses is proof of the Russian position.
Russia wants the U.S. out of Syria unless joint action authorized by the U.N., in consultation with Damascus, is taken.  Any resolution for such action has to be very language-precise to avoid the catastrophe of the Libyan Affair.  SyrPer believes that a new diplomatic strategy is part of the agenda in Sochi.  This is because the Russians have read correctly that a new Republican-dominated Congress in Washington will pressure the American president into greater adventurism in the Near and Middle East.  With a valid Chapter 7 resolution on the table (which the West will veto) Russia will be prepared to participate militarily, a fact that will kibosh France’s ludicrous dream of a no-fly or buffer zone.  Actually, the Russians are analyzing this very brilliantly.  We only hope Damascus catches on.
SyrPer has learned that Russian companies are being given the priority in both exploration and drilling for natural gas off the coast of Syria in territorial waters.  These agreements, which will be of immense importance to Moscow in the way it maneuvers economically around the limp-wristed sanctions promoted by Germany and France,  lie at the heart of the profitable line of credit Moscow has extended to Damascus.  Mr. Mu’allim has been reminded that the line of credit and the good will have yet to be exhausted.
With the Syrian Army verging on the liberation of all Aleppo City – an eventuality calculated to diminish Western machinations in the area – an eventuality seen as unacceptable by the Saudi vermin and the Turk sociopaths – Russia is consulting with Mr. Mua’llim about a renewed Western push to establish an Islamist rump state abutting Turkey which the West hopes to use as a bargaining chip against Dr. Assad – the same bargaining chip they are trying to create in Der’ah with much difficulty and failure.  This rump state would figure favorably in France’s calculations for a security zone.
In order to deal with terrorist redeployments at the Turk border, with most frontier entryways in the hands of the terrorist allies of the U.S., Moscow is warning Damascusto expect an intensified American campaign targeting the Syrian Army as soon as Chuck Hagel is replaced by a more aggressive Defense Secretary more acceptable to the maniacal and blood-thirsty Republican war criminals in Congress. 
The Russians will tell Mr. Mua’llim that Russia will not object if the SAA deploys and uses its S-300 anti-aircraft missile defense system especially when the U.S. and Britain or France target the SAA in an effort to relieve pressure on their Jihadist/Takfeeri allies like Nusra or Harakat Hazm in both Aleppo and Idlib.
1
Syria knows it must listen carefully to what Putin says.  With the Saudis and Qataris enjoying a new rapprochement after a failed Saudi-inspired coup e’etat in Doha and Saud Al-Faysal’s unproductive visit to Moscow, Mr. Putin is expecting a ramping up of pressure with greater investments by both culturally stagnant Arabian states in newly formed terrorist groups to be stationed in Turkey and Jordan.  Putin has told Mr. Mua’llem that he can count on Russia to continue building up the Syrian army, providing diplomatic support with an air umbrella (if necessary) to block any NATO assault on Syria.  Mr. Mua’llem could not expect any rosier confab.
The future of negotiations with the opposition appears to be distant and improbable.  While Russia wants to pursue a resolution consistent with the U.N. Charter, Syria has told Mr. Lavrov that sources inside the opposition are indicating nobody has any stomach for more failed conferences and that many in the opposition are looking for a way back to Damascus.  This means that Saudi Arabia has read the situation similarly based on its own stooges inside the enemy camp and that Riyadh sees no solution outside the scope of the battlefield.
This gets us now to the core of this essay.  Russia and Syria, with Iran, of course, are going to embark on a more combative approach to the war in Syria.  Expect more aggressive Russian moves at the U.N. in light of France’s volte-face on the contract for the Mistral helicopter carrier.  Russia is aware of how unpopular Hollande is in France.  All the French people need now is a crisis in the delivery of natural gas during winter time.  Remember, alcohol reduces body temperature.  The Russians, no novices when it comes to slurping vodka, know this very well.
Expect, also, action in the Arabian Peninsula.  I believe Iran will be pulling out all the stops, especially, if the Saudis make the mistake of executing Al-Shaykh Nimr Al-Nimr, the Shi’i cleric who was tried in a Saudi security court and found guilty of fomenting anti-monarchical violence.  Once Iran has made the decision in consultation with Russia and Syria (and Iraq), Saudi Arabia will get a taste of an insurgency which will spread from Bahrain to the Dhahraan oil fields all the way to Qatar.  Arabian monkeys will get a taste of what anti-Wahhabists do with serrated bread knives.
You are watching the collapse of the Arabian oil and gas empire.  We believe that Mr. Putin has told Mr. Mu’allem that a new multi-polar world order has no place for pre-Iron Age apes like the Saudis and the Qataris.  We think Mr. Putin is going to start kicking them to the curb.  ZAF