
Sunday, 22 March 2015
Weekly Report On Israeli Human Rights Violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (12 - 18 March 2015)

FULL REPORT HERE
Israeli forces continued to open fire at border areas in the Gaza Strip, but no casualties were reported.
A civilian vehicle was burnt because it was fired at in the north of the Gaza Strip.
Israeli forces continued to use excessive force against peaceful protests in the West Bank.
Three Palestinian protestors were wounded during al-Nabi Saleh and Kufor Qaddoum weekly protests.
Twelve Palestinian civilians, including three children, were wounded in other protests.
Israeli forces conducted 65 incursions into Palestinian communities in the West Bank and seven ones in East Jerusalem.
Sixty Palestinian civilians, including 16 child and two women, were arrested.
Twenty-seven of these civilians, including 15 children and two women, were arrested in occupied Jerusalem.
Israel continued to impose a total closure on the oPt and has isolated the Gaza Strip from the outside world.
Israeli forces established dozens of checkpoints in the West Bank.
Twelve Palestinian civilians, including eight children, were arrested at military checkpoints in the West Bank.
Israeli forces arrested a businessman at Beit Hanoun (Erez) crossing, north of the Gaza Strip.
Israeli navy forces continued to target Palestinian fishermen in the Gaza Strip Sea.
Israeli navy forces continued to open fire at fishing boats, but no casualties were reported.
Israeli forces continued efforts to create Jewish majority in occupied East Jerusalem.
Israeli police allowed Elad Association to seize three apartments in Selwan village .
Israeli forces attempted to evacuate a house in the old city in occupied Jerusalem for the interest of settlers.
Eight buses heading from Sour Baher village to al-Aqsa Mosque were denied access to the mosque.
Israeli forces continued to support settlement activities in the West Bank and Israeli settlers continued to attack Palestinian civilians and property.
A residential compound for shepherds in Kherbet Mak'houl area, north of Jordan Valley, was demolished, due to which, four families comprising of 13 members became homeless.
A barrack in al-Faresiya area was demolished and two water reservoirs were seized.
A car glass was crushed as settlers threw stones at it, south of Jenin, but no casualties were reported.
Summary
Israeli violations of international law and international humanitarian law in the oPt continued during the reporting period (12 – 18 March 2015).
Shooting:
During the reporting period, Israeli forces wounded 15 Palestinian civilians, including three children, in the West Bank. They also continued to target Palestinian fishermen in the Gaza Strip sea and farmers, shepherds and agricultural lands in the border area.
In the West Bank, Israeli forces wounded 15 Palestinian civilians, including three children. Three of these civilians were wounded in protests against the annexation wall and settlement activities, while the other 12 ones were wounded in protests against the Israeli policies applied in oPt.
Israeli forces continued the use of excessive and systematic force against peaceful protests organized by Palestinian civilians and Israeli and international solidarity activists against the construction of the annexation wall and settlement activities in the West Bank. As a result, three protestors were wounded, two of whom were wounded in Kufor Qaddoum's protest, northeast of Qalqilya.
In the same context, 12 Palestinian civilians, including three children, were wounded during other protests organized at the western entrance of Selwad village, northeast of Ramallah, the southern entrance of al-Jalazoun refugee camp, north of Ramallah, and around Ofer detention facility, southwest of Ramallah.
In the Gaza Strip, in the context of opening fire at border areas, on 17 March 2015, Israeli soldiers, who stepped from 2 military vehicles along the border fence, north of Beit Lahia, north of the Gaza Strip, opened fire at Palestinian farmers working on their lands adjacent to the border fence. About ten bullets hit a vehicle belonging to a farmer from al-Atatrah neighbourhood. As a result, the vehicle was completely burnt, but no casualties were reported.
As part of targeting fishermen in the Gaza Strip sea, on 13 March 2015, Israeli gunboats stationed off al-Sudaniya area, west of Jabalia, north of the Gaza Strip, opened fire around Palestinian fishing boats sailing three nautical miles off the shore. The fishermen were frightened and sailed back, but neither casualties nor material damage were reported.
Incursions:
During the reporting period, Israeli forces conducted at least 65 military incursions into Palestinian communities in the West Bank and seven one in East Jerusalem. During these incursions, Israeli forces arrested at least 60 Palestinians, including 16 children and two women. Twenty-seven of these Palestinians, including the 16 children and two women, were arrested in Jerusalem.
Restrictions on movement:
Israel continued to impose a tight closure of the oPt, imposing severe restrictions on the movement of Palestinian civilians in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, including occupied East Jerusalem.
The illegal closure of the Gaza Strip, which has been steadily tightened since June 2007 has had a disastrous impact on the humanitarian and economic situation in the Gaza Strip. The Israeli authorities impose measures to undermine the freedom of trade, including the basic needs for the Gaza Strip population and the agricultural and industrial products to be exported. For 8 consecutive years, Israel has tightened the land and naval closure to isolate the Gaza Strip from the West Bank, including occupied Jerusalem, and other countries around the world. This resulted in grave violations of the economic, social and cultural rights and a deterioration of living conditions for 1.8 million people. The Israeli authorities have established Karm Abu Salem (Kerem Shaloum) as the sole crossing for imports and exports in order to exercise its control over the Gaza Strip’s economy. They also aim at imposing a complete ban on the Gaza Strip’s exports.
Efforts to create a Jewish demographic majority in East Jerusalem
Incursions and arrests
On Sunday, 15 March 2015, Israeli forces moved into al-Eisawiya village, north of East Jerusalem. They raided a number of houses from which they arrested two civilians.
On the same day, Israeli forces arrested 3 girls and a woman, who were present around al-Selsela gate of al-Aqsa Mosque in the old city.
On Monday, 16 March 2015, Israeli forces moved into al-Eisawiya village, north of East Jerusalem. They raided and searched a number of houses from which they arrested four civilians, including three children.
On the same day, Israeli forces moved into Ras al-Amoud neighborhood, east of the old city. They raided and searched a number of houses from which they arrested three children.
On Tuesday, 17 March 2015, Israeli forces arrested a woman and three young men while being present in the yard of al-Aqsa Mosque in the old city under the pretext of participating in riots.
On the same day, Israeli forces arrested Mahdi Hatem Abu Asab (11), while he was present in al-Qarmi neighborhood, in the old city.
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015, Israeli forces moved into Beit Hanina neighborhood, north of East Jerusalem. They raided and searched a number of houses from which they arrested three civilians, including a child.
On the same day, Israeli forces raided a house belonging to Mohammed Darweesh in al-Eisawiya village, north of East Jerusalem. They searched the house and arrested his son Khaled (17).
On the same day, Israeli forces moved into al-Thawri neighborhood, south of East Jerusalem. They raided and searched a number of houses from which they arrested two civilians, including a child.
On the same day, Israeli forces moved into Ras al-Amoud neighborhood, east of the old city. They raided and searched a number of houses from which they arrested two children.
Also on the same day, Israeli forces arrested Jawad Siyam (42), director of the Information Center of Wadi Helwa, in Selwan village, south of the old city.
Settler attacks in the city:
On Friday, 13 March 2015, 2 settlers attacked Ahmed Mohammed Essa Abu Ta'ah (19) when he was in al-Masharef Mount area "the French Hill", north of the old city. As a result, he sustained wounds in the face and bruises in the neck.
At approximately 09:00 on Monday, 16 March 2015, Israeli forces surrounded a house belonging to Sab Laban family house in Aqabet al-Khalidiya in the old city. They tried to evacuate the house for the interest of settlers. Israeli forces brought demolition tools to burst out the door and force the family get out of the house. The family lawyer intervened and obtained an order to delay the evacuation.
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015, Israeli Elad Association seized by forgery a building belonging to al-Malehi family and two tracts of land in Wadi Helwa neighborhood, south of the old city.
In the same context, under the protection of Israeli forces, dozens of armed settlers seized a 500-square-meter tract of land belonging to al-Abasi family in Wadi Helwa neighborhood and established tin-made rooms on it. They also seized a 1,200-square-meter tract of land belonging to Sh'aban family in the same neighborhood. They cleaned the land and placed a caravan on it.
Restrictions on movement in the city
On Sunday morning, 15 March 2015, Israeli police denied eight buses from Sour Baher, south of East Jerusalem, access to al-Aqsa Mosque.
Settlement activities and attacks by settlers against Palestinian civilians and property
On 16 March 2015, Israeli forces noticed Qana Valley farmers, northwest of Salfit, that they would uproot 240 olive trees aged six years from the lands of al-Tanour lands belonging to Hasan Mustafa Mansour, Mohammed 'Abdel Fattah Zidan and Ahmed Khalil Mansour from the village. They gave the farmers 48 hours to remove the trees starting from 15 March 2015 and threatened either to uproot the trees or to subject the three aforementioned farmers to trial, harm and detention.
On 18 March 2015, Israeli forces backed by three bulldozers moved into Kherbet Makhoul area in the Northern Jordan Valley, east of Tubas. The Israeli bulldozers immediately levelled a residential compound for Palestinian shepherds.
Israeli forces then headed to the nearby al-Hadideyah area, and their bulldozers levelled 60-square-meter barrack belonging to Ahmed 'Abdullah Hafez Bani 'Odah. They then went to al-Farisiyah area and confiscated two water tanks of a capacity of 12 cubic meters.
At approximately 10:00 on the Wednesday, Israeli forces moved into al-Thaheriyah village, south of Hebron. They stationed in Ma'ala Valley area in the southeast of the village and then cut down ten almond trees and cactus seedlings in addition to confiscating them. The Civil Administration officer who accompanied the Israeli soldiers sprayed chemicals at the rest of the tree stalks in the land.
On Friday, 13 March 2015, settlers gathered on the main road between Jenin, Tulkarm and Nablus near the entrance of Silet al-Thaher village, south of Jenin. The settlers fired in the air and threw stones at the passing Palestinian vehicles traveling on the aforementioned road.
On Tuesday, 17 March 2015, Israeli settlers gathered on the main road between Jenin, Tulkarm and Nablus near the entrance of Silet al-Thaher village, south of Jenin. The settlers threw stones at the passing Palestinian vehicles traveling on the aforementioned road.
Around the same time, Israeli forces moved into Um al-Rayhan village, which has been isolated from its surroundings by the annexation wall, southwest of Jenin. They levelled vacant lands in the vicinity of a barrack used to manufacture marble.
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
Labels:
Gaza,
Jewish terrorism,
Jewish violence,
Netanyahu,
Palestine,
Siege on Gaza,
War on Gaza
A Very Kosher Dishonesty (must read!!!)
By Paul Eisen
It’s now well known that the Royal Northern College of Music (RNCM) was pressured by Zionist lobbyists North West Friends of Israel (NWFOI) to cancel a concert by internationally acclaimed jazz saxophonist Gilad Atzmon. What is less well known is that the co-chair and spokesperson for NWFOI is one Anthony Dennison (Mr Dennison’s name and role in the organisation may be confirmed here). These machinations by the NWFOI and the leading role played by Mr Dennison were dulyreported by the Jewish Chronicle
So far, so… well, if not exactly good, certainly understandable.
Less understandable is the fact (not mentioned by the JC) of Mr Dennison’s documented and well-known dishonesty. Because of his dishonesty, Anthony Dennison, once a lawyer closely associated with the no win, no fee scam was found by the High Court to be unworthy to practice law and was duly struck off
Everyone knew about it. The BBC knew about it, the Solicitor’s Journal knew about it,The Daily Telegraph knew about it, and The Manchester Evening News knew about itso it’s safe to say that the NWFOI and the JC certainly knew about it.
But Mr Dennison is not only an aficionado of white-collar dishonesty; in fact he’s not at all averse to getting down and dirty because it seems that Anthony Dennison is also a bit of a football hooligan. Perhaps you remember the incident from October 2014 when Mr Dennison’s all-Jewish football team (Maccabi) was about to be wiped out in a match (9:2 with only 10 minutes left to play) and Mr Dennison took his young players off the pitch claiming ‘anti-Semitic abuse.’ The fledgeling anti-Semite was duly disciplined but Dennison was also later banned and fined by the FA – for his “foul and abusive behaviour”. And yes, the incident was duly reported by the JC here and here
So are we entitled to conclude that Anthony Dennison is both dishonest and a hooligan? And if we are, is it then surprising that, when orchestrating the pressure on the RNCM, he should call to his support the now implicated in theJeffrey Epstein under-age sex scandal none other than fellow discredited lawyer Alan Dershowitz?
Leaving aside whether we should allow such a man as Anthony Dennison to bully a British artist and academic and a beloved cultural institution, there is another, wider question to be asked: How come a supposedly respectable lobbying organisation like NWFOI is happy to have as a prime representative a man known to be dishonest and also an occasional hooligan? And further, how come the premier Jewish media outlet representing mainstream Jewish opinion in this country has nothing to say on this matter?
How come?
Well, for us Jews, when something is legitimate and acceptable we say it is kosher. So, in the case of Anthony Dennison we have to admit that some dishonesty is well…kosher!
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
WHY DOES ISRAEL HATE RACHEL CORRIE?
March 21, 2015 By FalastinNews Staff
By Ahmed Ali
In March 2003, Rachel Corrie, a young American woman who had traveled to Gaza to try to prevent the Israelis from destroying Palestinian homes, stood in front of an Israeli Caterpillar bulldozer to force the driver to stop.But he drove over her. And then drove over her. When her friends ran to her help, she said: ‘My back is broken.’ And she died. Robert Fisk
Rachel Corrie’s Stance with Justice:
A reflective safety Vest. A loudspeaker. Blonde hair and white skin. And an American accent. Nothing could have prevented Rachel Corrie from being murdered by the Israeli bulldozer. For the Israeli soldier, Rachel was standing with the wrong people, for the wrong cause. And thus she deserved to be killed.
Rachel came to Palestine with a message of peace. She was not suicidal. She never thought that that would be her end. She was only trying to defend Palestinian houses from being destroyed and hundreds of Palestinians from being displaced. Rachel Corrie came to talk to the Israeli soldiers, to make them change their minds. None of her pleas found attentive ears. On the contrary, her very presence was provocative. Rachel’s stance with the oppressed seems to have driven the soldiers crazy.

The Israeli driver of the Caterpillar bulldozer drove over Rachel’s fragile body. And he drove over her again in a style that showed that the crime was premeditated. None of the soldiers present seemed to care. It was like they finally vented their spite on the pro-Palestinian American activist.
Killing with impunity:
There is a culture of impunity in the Israeli army. No one has seen or experienced this like the occupied Palestinian people. We have seen in so many occasions, crimes and massacres perpetrated by the Israeli army. The death of Rachel and the deaths of thousands of Palestinians remain uninvestigated. And on the very few occasions a case is brought to the Israeli military court, the verdict is usually worse than the crime itself. Laughably worse.
In 2004, for example, schoolgirl Iman Al-Hams, 13, from Rafahwas shot 17 times. When the case was investigated, the Israeli soldier who murdered Iman expressed no regret over his crime and emphatically said he would have done the same even if the girl was a 3-year-old.
Later a military tribunal acquitted the murderer, named as Captain R., clearing him of all the charges against him AND later he was promoted and compensated for the cost of his defense and time spent in jail.
Broken Legal System:
The Corries, Craig and Cindy, filed a case in 2005 to hold Israel responsible for the killing of Rachel. Expectedly, the Israeli court panel advocated the “combat activities exception” principle that states Israeli forces cannot be held liable for damages of activities occurring in a war zone.
The judge found no fault in the military investigation that cleared the Israeli army of responsibility for Rachel’s death, claiming the driver did not see or hear her. Rachel Corrie was fully visible, her voice over the loudspeaker clearly audible. The bulldozer’s driver meant to crush her. The appeal was dismissed.
The court ruling came as no shock to anyone. The family affirmed the judge ignored contradictory evidence by key state witnesses, adding: “Regretfully, when reading the ruling, one gets the impression that the court of first instance set for itself the final goal of rejecting the lawsuit.”
“Our family’s legal options in Israel are nearly exhausted, but our search for justice for Rachel goes forward,” stated the Corrie family.
Accusing Israel’s legal system of complicity, Rachel’s parents reiterated their insistence on justice on the 12th anniversary of Rachel’s death:
“The facts uncovered in our legal effort in Israel, and the clear evidence of the Israeli court’s complicity with the occupation revealed in the outcome, lay important legal groundwork for the future.”
The same old story:
The Corries’ remarks are reminiscent of Tom Hurndall’s mother Jocelyn Hurndall,
“It seems that life is cheap in the occupied territories. Different value attached to life depends on whether the victim happens to be Israeli, international or Palestinian.”
Tom Hurndall was also murdered by the Israeli army.
Demonizing Rachel Corrie:
Israel’s racially prejudiced justice system is always helped by organized and systematic campaigns to demonize whoever they mark as Anti-Semite aka Pro-Palestinian. Israelis and pro-Israelis have waged a war against Rachel Corrie describing her as “terrorist, fool, idiot, suicidal, Hamas” … among many other things.
A simple preview of Pro-Israel’s twitter accounts can reveal the extent to which Israel is willing to go to slander anyone who stands with Palestine:
Ben Af Rothenberg @RisingRedStorm
next time put #RachelCorrie in front of 1. She got what she deserved
next time put #RachelCorrie in front of 1. She got what she deserved
Ben Af Rothenberg@RisingRedStorm
#RachelCorrie was 1 foolish chick. Who jumps in front of a bulldozer. She had mental issues & why USA won’t back her & her fam up
Ben Af Rothenberg@RisingRedStorm
funny how USA agrees their citizen #RachelCorrie was helping Hamas MB. 2 bad. Good riddance.
ASoldiersMother@ASoldiersMother
If you walk in front of a bulldozer and the driver can’t see you, you are probably going to get hurt #IDIOT #RACHELCORRIE
Ora Levitt@IDFsoldiergirl
#rachelcorrie was an idiot bitch who shouldn’t have interfered with Israel s affairs. Human shields are idiots! #flotilla #Israel
Ora Levitt@IDFsoldiergirl
dumb bitch. #Israel #rachelcorrie defending a human shield for Hamas
This smearing campaign intends to wash the blood off Israel’s blood-soaked hands and present Rachel as a guilty terrorist who deserved to die. If Rachel’s death was an accident, we still have to ask why this hate from Israel’s supporters, the majority of whom are paid social media activists?
For Israel, if you stand with Justice, you deserve death:
We have seen that inhumanely appalling behavior even with American activist Kayla Mueller, who was held by and died in ISIS captivity. The Electronic Intifada reported that “supporters of Israel are expressing joy over the death of 26-year-old humanitarian aid worker and sometime Palestine solidarity activist Kayla Mueller.”
Rania Khaled concluded her Electronic Intifada investigation saying:
Between the Zionist backlash against Mueller, the outlets erasing her Palestine activism and those using her death to advance their own agendas, there is one constant: Mueller’s support for Palestinians against Israeli oppression is a taboo that must be ignored, obscured or ridiculed.
Palestine remembers:
For Palestinians, however, Rachel Corrie will always remain an icon of love, peace and humanity. Her name is frequently remembered among Palestinians. And every year on March, 16th, Palestinians and pro-Palestinians all over the world mark the untimely and tragic death of a fine lady whose only crime was calling for an end to oppression and injustice. Justice for Rachel is a must that we Palestinians will always aspire to.
Related Articles
- ‘Occupation hurting Palestine women’
- ISRAELI SHOOT GAZANS AND EGYPTIAN DETAIN OTHERS
- OBAMA CONGRATULATES MILEIKOWSKY, SAYS HE'LL "REASSESS" RELATIONS WITH 'ISRAEL'
- Jewish terrorist settlers take over a Palestinian home in Silwan
- IOF burns poultry farm in Tulkarem and uproots 150 olive trees in al-Khalil
- Jewish Settlers Storm Al-Aqsa Compound
- IOF Bulldozes Palestinian Home in West Bank
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
Labels:
Home demolition,
IOF,
Jewish Crimes,
Martyrs,
Nazi Israel,
Palestine,
Rachel Corrie
Ansarullah Announces Public Mobilization, Calls on Army to Face Takfiri Crimes
Local Editor
Yemeni revolutionary movement, Ansarullah, announced on Saturday the public mobilization, calling on the Army and the security forces to confront the takfiri terrorism.
Ansarullah stressed, in a statement, the importance of the political support to the security measures in face of terrorist crimes.
All the Yemenis have to close ranks and cooperate with the military and security forces in order to protect the country from the takfiri peril, according to the statement.
Source: Agencies
| 21-03-2015 - 18:19 Last updated 21-03-2015 - 18:19 |
Yemen’s Ansarullah seizes control of Ta'izz airport: Sources
Sun Mar 22, 2015 7:53AM
Fighters of Yemen’s Ansarullah movement have taken control of an airport in southwestern city of Ta'izz, security sources say.
The Houthi fighters and their allies seized the airport on Sunday after defeating forces loyal to fugitive President Abd Rabbuh Mansur Hadi, the sources said.
The seizure of the airport comes as part of the Houthi fighters' advances to take full control of Ta'izz, a strategic city between the capital, Sana’a and Aden.
Reports say Houthi fighters also captured several state facilities including a court complex in Ta'izz.
"Houthi forces also took control of the city's central prison Saturday night and set up checkpoints near the prison," an official told the DPA.
The new development came two days after Hadi gave a televised speech challenging the Houthis. He called the movement’s rule in the capital and elsewhere a “coup against constitutional legitimacy.”
Following the speech, Ansarullah called for a “general mobilization” against forces loyal to the embattled president.
The Yemeni Houthis, in a statement from the movement’s Supreme Revolutionary Committee issued on Saturday, described the motive behind the move as “deteriorating security conditions in the country” and the “war imposed on the Yemeni people on all fronts.”
Hadi, along with members of Prime Minister Khaled Bahah’s cabinet, stepped down in late January, but the parliament did not approve the resignation. The president fled his home in Sana’a on February 21, after weeks under effective house arrest and went to Aden, Yemen’s second largest city in the south, where he officially withdrew his resignation and highlighted his intention to resume duties. This came weeks after the Houthi fighters took control of Sana’a in September 2014.
Some Persian Gulf Arab states, including Saudi Arabia, have already relocated their embassies from Sana’a to Aden.
Hadi also called on the Ansarullah revolutionaries to relinquish power and leave Sana’a. The Houthis, however, said Hadi had lost his legitimacy as head of state and was being sought as a fugitive from justice.
The Houthi movement played a key role in the 2011 popular uprising that forced the longtime dictator, Ali Abdullah Saleh, to quit after 33 years in power. The revolutionaries say the government has been incapable of properly running the affairs of the country and providing security.
DB/HMV
Related Videos
استهداف المصلين في بيوت الله | المسيرة
التوتر الامني في صنعاء وعدن
Related Articles
- Over 20 Arrested in Tunisia over Links to Attack in Bardo Museum
- US Evacuates Troops from South Yemen Base
- Three Killed As Clashes Rumble on in East Ukraine
- Ansarullah: Terrorist Attacks Controlled by Foreign, Regional Powers
- Syria: Terrorist Bombings in Hasaka Kill, Injure Scores of Civilians
- Hezbollah Calls on Yemenis to Stick to Solidarity in Face of Takfiri Terrorism
- ISIL Claims Deadly Yemen Mosque Bombings
River to Sea
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
Labels:
GCC,
Houthis,
regime change,
USA,
Wars for Israel,
Yemen
Obama Reevaluating US Position on Israel? Don’t Bet on it!
Global Research, March 21, 2015

A so-called special relationship began in March 1948 when Harry Truman met secretly with Israel’s future first president Chaim Weizmann.
He pledged support for the future Jewish state. Minutes after midnight on May 15, 1948, America was the first country extending recognition.
A special relationship remains strong for strategic reasons. It developed politically, economically and militarily.
Leaders come and go. Names and faces change. Bumps in the road occasionally occur.
Obama put up with Netanyahu for over six years. Both leaders clearly dislike each other.
Geopolitics alone matters. Expect no substantive change in US/Israeli relations ahead.
Ignore rhetoric. It’s meaningless. It’s unrelated to policies. Politicians say one thing and do another with disturbing regularity.
On the stump campaigning, Netanyahu categorically rejected Palestinian self-determination.
“Whoever moves to establish a Palestinian state or intends to withdraw from territory is simply yielding territory for radical Islamic terrorist attacks against Israel,” he said.
Asked if he meant no Palestinian state on his watch, he responded: “Indeed.”
Reelected Netanyahu’s rhetoric changed. “I don’t want a one-state solution,” he said.
“I want a sustainable, peaceful two-state solution. But for that, circumstances have to change.”
He means unconditional Palestinian surrender to Israeli demands. His position is no different from all Israeli leaders preceding him.
Fact: In 1948, Israel stole 78% of historic Palestine.
Fact: In 1967, it stole the rest.
Fact: No government in Israeli history supported Palestinian self-determination.
Fact: None supported a so-called peace process.
Fact: No significant Israeli political party today supports granting Palestinians rights mattering most.
Fact: None favor treating Arabs and Jews equally.
Fact: None support Palestinian statehood.
Fact: None back ending militarized occupation harshness.
Fact: None endorse changing longstanding racist policies in place since 1948.
Fact: US/Israeli relations remain rock solid.
Fact: Personal relationships between leaders don’t matter.
Fact: Longterm strategic relations determine policies of mutual interest.
Washington is Israeli-occupied territory. AIPAC-led Israeli Lobby power owns Congress. No US president ever dared defy it.
Nothing politicians or their spokespersons say holds water. Netanyahu’s demagogic bluster matches Obama’s.
They say one thing. They do another. On Wednesday, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said:
“Based on (Netanyahu’s) comments, the United States is in a position going forward where we will be evaluating our approach with regard to how best to achieve a two-state solution.”“But that doesn’t mean that we’ve made a decision about changing our position with respect to the UN.”
Fact: Rhetoric aside, Washington never supported Palestinian statehood.
Fact: It never backed sustainable, durable, equitable Israeli/Palestinian peace.
Fact: It consistently vetoes Security Council resolutions inimical to Israeli interests.
Fact: Expect no change in longstanding US policy toward Israel ahead.
Foreign Policy magazine commented on what it called Netanyahu’s “flip flop flip.”
It said “US officials signaled a willingness to consider a UN resolution in the event that Netanyahu was reelected and formed a coalition government opposed to peace talks.”
An unnamed Western diplomat was quoted saying “(t)he more the new government veers to the right, the more you will see something in New York.”
Longterm Israeli governance is right of center. Most often it’s been hard-right – notably under Begin, Shamir, Sharon and Netanyahu.
Israel’s first prime minister, David Ben-Gurion, was notoriously racist. So were all Israeli leaders following him.
Netanyahu is the latest in a long line of rogue prime ministers. US/Israeli relations remain fundamentally unchanged.
Washington will continue generously funding its war machine. Both countries partner in each other’s high crimes against peace.
Palestinian rights don’t matter. The so-called peace process is pure fantasy. It’s been stillborn throughout decades of talks.
World public opinion and BDS-type initiatives are Palestinians’ best hope for change.
All Israeli leaders reflect its dark side. Netanyahu’s demagogic thuggishness does best.
His rhetoric, style, demeanor and policies reveal Israel’s true face better than any of his predecessors.
Palestinian BDS National Committee’s Mahmoud Nawajaa called his reelection “a victory for apartheid and colonialism.”
He urged “supporters of freedom and justice across the world to join us in intensifying our efforts to boycott Israel and to push governments to impose sanctions against Israeli apartheid, just as South African apartheid was isolated.”
BDS co-founder Omar Barghouti added:
“Israel, a belligerent nuclear power that completely disregards international law and basic human rights, will soon have its most fanatical government ever, with grave consequences for Palestinians as well as for world peace. Israel has dropped the mask.”
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.” http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com. Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network. It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs.
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
Saturday, 21 March 2015
‘Islamic State’ as a Western Phenomenon

After 4 years of the Anglo-Zionist conspiracy on Syria, Ramzy Baroud, the “Son” of a Palestinian freedom fighter, refrains “from suggesting that IS is largely a creation of western intelligence”.
Ramzi ” justified the questions regarding:
“funds, armaments, black market oil trade, and the ease through which thousands of western and Arab fighters managed to reach Syria and Iraq in recent years.”
For him the so-called Arab fighters and ISIS is an outcome of the “War Crimes” Assad regime, his army and allies :
“The crimes carried out by the Assad regime, his army and allies [ Hezbollah and Iran] during the four-year long Syria civil war, and the unquenchable appetite to orchestrate a regime change in Damascus as a paramount priority for Western powers made nourishing the anti-Assad forces with wannabe “jihadists” justified, if not encouraged.“
For the Anglo-Zionist Empire the Crime of the Syrian Regime, army and allies is some thing else:
- Syria is the cradle of Arab nationalism and Arab resistance.
- Syria refusal to bow and her success in preventing the so-called peace with the “Israel”
- Syrian support for the resistance movements in Palestine and Lebanon
In case Ramzy Baroud, the “Son” of a Palestinian freedom fighter, missed it:
In defending ISLAM Baroud referred to the so called “War on Islam”ignoring the fact:
- The war Anglo-Zionist war is on Revolutionary Islam (Hezbollah, Hamas Islamic Jihad and Iran) not on Reactionary Islam (GCC – Wahabism the mother of Islamic Terrorism)
- Syria and Iraq libya are not Islamic states. I wonder how Baroud would Justify the war on Venezuela and Russia?
Finally the so-called “rules of war in Islam”. I wonder if Baroud ever heard about Hawarij and its likes in Islamic History. Instead of saying the “rules of war in Islam” he should have said the “rules of war in Quran”
محمد شحرور – مفهوم الحرية واستعمال العنف
‘An Islamic View of the Christian World’ By Shaikh Imran Hosein
‘Islamic State’ as a Western Phenomenon
Posted on March 20, 2015
Reimagining the IS Debate

No matter how one attempts to wrangle with the rise of IS, it just doesn’t add up.
By Ramzy Baroud
It is as if leaders of the so-called “Islamic State” (IS) are getting tips on demonising Muslims from world leading Islamophobes and as if they are trying to live up to the expectations of hate-mongering organisations like that of Pamela Geller’s American Freedom Defense Initiative, whose latest ads all over San Francisco compared Muslims to Nazis.
Yet, no matter how one attempts to wrangle with IS’s rise in Iraq and Syria, desperately seeking any political or other context that would validate the movement as an explainable historical development, things refuse to add up.
Western Connection
Not only is IS to a degree an alien movement in the larger body politic of the Middle East, it also seems to be a partly western phenomenon, a hideous offspring resulting from western neocolonial adventures in the region, coupled with alienation and demonisation of Muslim communities in western societies.
By “Western phenomenon,” I refrain from suggesting that IS is largely a creation of western intelligence as many conspiracy theories have persistently advocated. Of course, one is justified in raising questions regarding funds, armaments, black market oil trade, and the ease through which thousands of western and Arab fighters managed to reach Syria and Iraq in recent years. The crimes carried out by the Assad regime, his army and allies during the four-year long Syria civil war, and the unquenchable appetite to orchestrate a regime change in Damascus as a paramount priority for Western powers made nourishing the anti-Assad forces with wannabe “jihadists” justified, if not encouraged.
The latest announcement by Turkey’s foreign minister Meylut Cavusoglu of the arrest of a spy “working for the intelligence service of a country participating in the coalition against ISIS” – presumably Canada – allegedly for helping three young British girls join IS, was revealing. The accusation feeds into a growing discourse that locates IS within a western, not Middle Eastern discourse.
Still, it is not the conspiracy per se that I find intriguing, if not puzzling, but the ongoing, albeit indirect conversation between IS and the West, involving French, British and Australian so-called “Jihadists”, their sympathisers and supporters on one hand, and various western governments, intelligence services, right-wing media pundits, etc on the other.
Much of the discourse – once upon a time located within a narrative consumed by the “Arab Spring”, sectarian divisions and counter revolutions – has now been transferred into another sphere that seems of little relevance to the Middle East. Regardless of where one stands on how Mohammad Emwazi morphed into a “Jihadi John”, the conversation is oddly largely removed from its geopolitical context. In this instance, it is an essentially British issue concerning alienation, racism, economic and cultural marginalization, perhaps as much as the issue of the “born, raised and radicalised” attackers of Charlie Hebdo is principally a French question, pertaining to the same socioeconomic fault lines.
The Other ‘Roots of IS’
The conventional analysis on the rise of IS no longer suffices. Tracing the movement to Oct 2006 when the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI) – uniting various groups including al-Qaeda – was established, simply suggests a starting point to the discussion, whose roots go back to the dismantling of the Iraqi state and army by the US military occupation authority. Just the idea that the Arab republic of Iraq was led from 11 May 2003 until 28 June 2004 by a Lewis Paul Bremer III, is enough to delineate the unredeemable rupture in the country’s identity. Bremer and US military chiefs’ manipulation of Iraq’s sectarian vulnerabilities, in addition to the massive security vacuum created by sending an entire army home, ushered in the rise of numerous groups, some homegrown resistance movements, and other alien bodies who sought in Iraq a refugee, or a rallying cry.
Also conveniently missing in the rise of “jihadism” context is the staggering brutality of Shia-dominated governments in Baghdad and militias throughout Iraq, with full backing by the US and Iran. If the US war (1990-1), blockade (1991-2003), invasion (2003) and subsequent occupation of Iraq were not enough to radicalise a whole generation, then brutality, marginalisation and constant targeting of Iraqi Sunnis in post-invasion Iraq have certainly done the job.
The conventional media narrative on IS focuses mostly on the politicking, division and unity that happened between various groups, but ignores the reasons behind the existence of these groups in the first place.
The Syria Expansion
The Syria civil war was another opportunity at expansion sought successfully by ISI, whose capital until then was Baquba, Iraq. ISI was headed by Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, a key player in the establishment of Jabhat al-Nusra (al-Nusra Front). The highly cited breakup between al-Baghdadi and al-Nusra leader Mohammed al-Golani is referenced as the final stage of IS’s brutal rise to power and ISI becoming ISIL or ISIS, before settling finally at the current designation of simply “Islamic State”, or IS.
Following the division, “some estimates suggest that about 65 percent of Jabhat al-Nusra elements quickly declared their allegiance to ISIS. Most of those were non-Syrian jihadists,” reported Lebanon’s al-Safir.
Militants’ politicking aside, such massively destructive and highly organised occurrences are not born in a vacuum and don’t operate independently from many existing platforms that help spawn, arm, fund and sustain them. For example, IS’s access to oil refineries says nothing about its access to wealth. To obtain funds from existing economic modes, IS needed to tap into a complex economic apparatus that would involve other countries, regional and international markets. In other words, IS exists because there are those who are invested in their existence, and the highly touted anti-IS coalition has evidently done little to confront this reality.
Intellectual Arrogance and Western Muslim Debate
Particularly interesting is the rapidly changing focal point of the debate, from that pertaining to Syria and Iraq, to a western-centric discussion about western-styled jihadists that seem removed from the Middle East region and its political conflicts and priorities.
In a letter signed by over a hundred Muslim scholars that was published last September, the theologians and clergymen from around the Muslim word rightly disowned IS and its bloodthirsty ambitions as un-Islamic. Indeed, IS’s war tactics are the reverse of the rules of war in Islam, and have been a godsend to those who made successful careers by simply bashing Islam, and advocating foreign policies that are predicated on an irrational fear of Muslims. But particularly interesting was the Arabic version of the letter’s emphasis on IS’s lack of command over the Arabic language, efficiency in which is a requirement for making legal Islamic rulings and fatwas.
“Who gave you authority over the ummah [Muslim people]?” asked the letter. “A group of no more than several thousand has appointed itself the ruler of over a billion-and-a-half Muslims. This attitude is based upon a corrupt circular logic that says: ‘Only we are Muslims, and we decide who the caliph is, we have chosen one and so whoever does not accept our caliph is not a Muslim.’”
The letter confronts the intellectual arrogance of IS, which is based mostly on a misguided knowledge of Islam that is rarely spawned in the region itself. But that intellectual arrogance that has led to the murders of many innocent people, and other hideous crimes such as the legalisation of slavery – again, to the satisfaction of the numerous Islamophobes dotting western intellectual landscapes – is largely situated in a different cultural and political context outside of the Middle East.
In post-11 September attacks, a debate concerning Islam has been raging, partly because the attacks were blamed on Muslims, thus allowing politicians to create distractions, and reduce the discussion into one concerning religion and a purported “clash of civilizations”. Despite various assurances by Western leaders that the US-led wars in Muslim countries is not a war on Islam, Islam remains the crux of the intellectual discourse that has adjoined the military “crusade” declared by George W Bush, starting with the first bomb dropped on Afghanistan in 2001.
That discourse is too involved for a transitory mention, for it is an essential one to the IS story. It is one that has involved various schools of thought, including a breed of Muslim “liberals”, used conveniently to juxtapose them with an “extremist” bunch. Yet between the apologists and the so-called jihadists, a genuine, Muslim-led discussion about Islam by non-coopted Muslim scholars remains missing.
The intellectual vacuum is more dangerous than it may seem. There is no question that while the battle is raging on in the Middle East region, the discourse itself is increasingly being manipulated and is becoming a Western one. This is why IS is speaking English, for its language complete with authentic western accents, methods, messages and even the orange hostage jumpsuits, is centred in some other sociopolitical and cultural context.
It is strange, but telling, how a discussion that began with uprisings for freedom and equality in Arab countries has been reduced to those concerning Islamic revival – liberal western Muslims vs extremists, Jihadi Johns, and western “spies” recruiting western Muslim youth, escaping marginalisation in their own communities. Yet, instead of serving as a wake-up call and urgent need for introspection by the West, there is a stubborn insistence on using IS as a springboard for more interventionism in the Middle East, thus feeding the cycle of violence, without confronting its roots.
Ramzy Baroud – www.ramzybaroud.net – is an internationally-syndicated columnist, a media consultant, an author of several books and the founder of PalestineChronicle.com. He is currently completing his PhD studies at the University of Exeter. His latest book is My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza’s Untold Story (Pluto Press, London).
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
Labels:
Assad,
ISIL,
Ramzy Baroud,
Syrian army,
Syrian opposition,
War on Iraq,
War on syria,
Wars for Israel
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




