Sunday, 19 June 2016

Tell California Senators to Vote ‘No’ on Anti-BDS Bill






adawabsha
Posted by Marcy
Urge the CA Senate Judiciary to vote NO on AB2844, the anti-BDS bill that mandates a state enemies list of businesses boycotting Israel — or any other country the US recognizes. The aim of the bill — to be heard on June 28th — is to deny state and city contracts to businesses on the enemies list. We don’t need another McCarthy era; we need free and robust public debate!
Action Items:
1. Contact the following Senators:
-State Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, at her Santa Barbara office at (805) 965-0862 or use the following email form:http://sd19.senate.ca.gov/send-e-mail.
-State Senator John Moorlach, Vice Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, at his Costa Mesa office at (714) 662-6050.
-State Senator Bill Monning (D-Carmel) at his office at (916) 651-4017
-State Senator Bob Weickowski (D-Fremont) at his office at (916) 651-4010
State Senator Joel Anderson (R-Alpine) at (619) 596-3136
2. You may use the following suggested script as a guide for your email or phone conversation.
“My name is ___________ and I live in _______, California. I am asking the Senator to oppose AB 2844, the California BDS Act of 2016 because it will have a chilling effect on public debate and aims to punish businesses — large and small — that protest human rights violations.
I expect the Senator to uphold the First Amendment to protect the right to boycott, and VOTE NO on AB2844.
Thank you for your time.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

US and UK Vigorously Reject the Concept of European Army



US and UK Vigorously Reject the Concept of European Army
ANDREI AKULOV | 17.06.2016 | OPINION

US and UK Vigorously Reject the Concept of European Army


Europe faces a deteriorating security environment. The issue of creating a European joint military has recently come to the fore.
Germany and France will relaunch closer European military cooperation this month and could start a common defence fund.
The fund, which could start on a small scale in 2017, could be backed by the European Investment Bank to finance projects. Other proposals could include enlarging cooperation between forces. Germany and the Netherlands have combined tank and naval forces and want to develop a common surface-to-air defence. French and British forces agreed in 2010 to work together. The list can go on.
It gives rise to the question – is there a secret plan to create an EU army?
The need for creating European military and operational structures is an issue included into the EU Global Strategy report prepared by EU foreign policy chief, Federica Mogherini, for the June 28 summit.
The plans foresee the development of new European military and operational structures, including joint headquarters. They are supported by Germany and other countries as the first step towards an EU army.
Remarkably, the idea to create a «Euro Army» has long been brewing in minds of EU leaders.
The concept has been strongly advocated by Javier Solana, who has held the positions of former NATO Secretary General, the European Union’s High Representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy, Secretary General of the Council of the European Union and Secretary-General of the Western European Union.
«The EU needs to strengthen its strategic and institutional capabilities, as well as cooperation over resources. Ultimately, this should amount to a European Defense Union (EDU), which would support NATO in providing territorial defense. Moreover, an ambitious EU foreign policy aimed at reducing instability and state fragility at its borders would take on security responsibilities through the use of military force and rapid response», Solana writes in a Wall Street Journal article.
NATO is not enough, Europe needs an army, says EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker.
According to him, NATO was not enough because not all members of the transatlantic defence alliance are in the EU. Juncker said, a common EU army would send important signals to the world.
Germany is pushing for progress towards a European army by advocating joint headquarters and shared military assets. A secret German defence white paper calling for the acceleration of the formation of a joint European Union Army has been leaked, revealing German ambitions to side-line NATO by creating a pan-EU force. The paper had seen its release date pushed back until after the British referendum on EU membership, apparently over fears that it would play into the hands of those advocating a leave vote. But a copy has been handed to the Financial Times, revealing the scale of Germany’s ambition for a pan-EU Army – led by Germany.
Last year, German Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen threw her weight behind the idea of a European Union army, floated by Jean-Claude Juncker. «I am convinced that a European army or a European defense union can be created as a logical consequence of European integration», Ms von der Leyen said during the Brussels Forum, a foreign-policy conference in Brussels.
So it doesn’t come as a surprise that on December 27, during an interview published in the German newspaper Bild am Sonntag, Germany Federal Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble said that «we will have to spend a lot more funds for joint European defense initiatives…[as] ultimately our aim must be a joint European army».
President of the European Council Donald Tusk noted that Europeans should consider«a new and more ambitious defense and security policy», and «not only as part of NATO».
Czech President Miloš Zeman has backed the initiative for the creation of a joint European army.
The UK strongly opposes the idea. Great Britain will never be part of an EU army, the government has insisted. Following a report that Brussels is moving to promote greater military cooperation between EU member states, a government spokesman said«The Prime Minister has repeatedly made clear that the UK will never be a part of an EU army. We retain a veto on all defence matters in the EU, and we will oppose any measures which would undermine member states’ military forces».
«Britain will never be part of an EU army. We have a veto on all EU defence matters and we would oppose any move to create one», says British Defence Secretary Michael Fallon as the June 23 referendum on EU membership gets closer.
«EU army plans kept secret from voters», was the front-page story in the Times.
Just two days before the Times publication, a retired British army commander, Major General Tim Ross, had claimed in the Daily Express that the EU was «moving inexorably towards full political union and all that comes with it», including «unified armed forces».
Former defense secretary Liam Fox warned that «Europe’s defence intentions are a dangerous fantasy» that risked cutting the UK off from the US, «our closest and most powerful ally».
There is some contradiction here. The UK government stands for EU membership before the Brexit referendum, but rejects a concept to further strengthen the bloc’s integration. Liam Fox’s statement explains the reasons behind this stance.
The UK is a staunch US ally inside the European Union. The idea of an EU army independent from the overseas partner gives Washington the jitters as it would lose its grip on Europe when it comes to key security issues. The EU would pour its money into its own armed forces while NATO is desperately trying to convince its European members to spend not less than 2 percent of their GDP on the Alliance’s needs. A Euro Army could remove the raison d’être for US forces in Europe. The whole concept of NATO dictates that Europe’s defenses should be incomplete, because part of the point is to keep the US involved in Europe. But is it not time for the EU, with 28 members, to be able to mount protection and peace-keeping missions in and around its own region? It may become especially acute if Donald Trump, known for his proclivity to disparage the role of NATO, wins the US presidential election.
In the recent past, EU countries, and especially the UK, have become embroiled in conflicts they had no need to enter. There was no good rationale, other than solidarity with the United States, to join interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq. These two lessons of the past are enough to militate in favor of giving precedence to European, rather than transatlantic, security interests.
Europe becoming responsible for its own security would become more independent and flexible on the Russian sanctions and other issues, even when it contradicts the interests of the United States. The differences dividing the EU and Russia are not forever, unlike the common security threats they face together. Cooperation in the field of security is a must and the most natural thing to do. After all, Russia and the EU belong to the same continent and face common problems, while the US is focused on the Asia «pivot» and its «global commitments».
Time will show, whether a Euro Army will become a reality or remain an unrealistic pipe dream. But nothing can change the fact – the trend to independence from the United States in the field of security is gaining momentum on the European continent.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

More than 50 Saudi-led Forces Killed, Injured in Yemen Rocket Attack

More than 50 Saudi-led forces were killed and injured as Yemeni army and popular committees launched a ballistic missile on their gathering in al-Jawf province.
Yemeni sources said at least 30 soldiers were killed while 24 others were injured in the rocket attack in al-Hazm governorate.ballsitic missile Yemen
The Saudi-led forces were gathering in Brigade 115 headquarters when a ballistic missile was fired, the sources said.
Among the killed and the injured are officials in the Saudi-led coalition which has been for more than a year launching an air campaign against Yemen, according to the sources.
Meanwhile, the sources added that ambulances rushed to the attack scene, amid high secrecy by the aggression forces on the losses.
Yemen has been since March 26, 2015 under brutal aggression by Saudi-led coalition.
Thousands have been martyred and injured in the attack, with the vast majority of them are civilians.
Riyadh launched the attack on Yemen in a bid to restore power to fugitive president Abd Rabbu Mansour Hadi who is a close ally to Saudi Arabia.
However, Yemeni army, backed by the committees has been engaged in battles with Saudi-led mercenaries and Hadi’s militias in several areas across the country.
Source: Al Manar TV
19-06-2016 – 12:04 Last updated 19-06-2016 – 12:05
Related video

Related Articles
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Israel Denies Water to Palestinian West Bank Areas




Israeli viciousness knows no limits, cutting off water to tens of thousands of Palestinians the latest example.

Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Rami Hamdallah issued a statement, accusing Israel of “waging a water war against the Palestinians.”

Netanyahu-led extremists want them “prevent(ed) from leading a dignified life and uses its control over our water resources to this end.”

“While illegal Israeli settlements enjoy uninterrupted water service, Palestinians are forced to spend great sums of money to buy water that is theirs in the first place” – stolen from them, then sold back at unaffordable prices.

Main water supplier Mekorot suspended supplies to Jenin, Salfit, Nablus area villages and elsewhere.

Israelis have virtual unlimited fresh water access, the West Bank average for Palestinians around 65-70 liters daily – well below the WHO 100-liter minimum needed for drinking, proper sanitation and hygiene.

According to Palestinian Hydrology Group executive director Ayman Rabi, some West Bank areas had no access to “water for more than 40 days.”

“People are relying on purchasing water from water trucks or finding it from alternative sources such as springs and other filling points in their vicinity” – some families forced “to live on two, three or 10 liters per capita per day,” inadequate to get by on longer term.

The Palestinian Al-Haq human rights group earlier explained Mekorot diverts up to 50% of Palestinian water during summer months for increased consumption needs of illegal settlements – their expansion exacerbating an already intolerable situation.

Israel’s Joint Water Committee decides how water resources are allocated – consistently denying Palestinians the right to upgrade their water infrastructure or expand it – to meet the needs of a growing population.

Around 200,000 West Bank Palestinians have no access to running water. According to PA prime minister’s office communications director Jamal Dajani, “Israel is waging water war against Palestinians,” in some cases denying them enough to sustain life.

For Gazans it’s worse. UNICEF calls over 90% of water from its sole aquifer contaminated, unfit to drink, including water sold by unregulated private vendors.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”


Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Putin Urges EU to Restore Cooperation with Russia, Says Moscow is ready to Meet Halfway

Putin Urges EU to Restore Cooperation with Russia, Says Moscow is ready to Meet Halfway

Saturday, 18 June 2016 10:54
Vladimir Putin has called on the EU to restore cooperation with Russia. Speaking at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum on Friday, Putin said Russia was ready to meet halfway, but stressed that the EU should also be willing to compromise.
Petersburg International Economic Forum
“We do not hold a grudge and are ready to meet our European partners halfway,” the Russian president told the forum. But it certainly cannot be a one-way game.”
“Our recent meetings with representatives of the German and French business circles have proved that the European business is willing and is ready to cooperate with our country. Politicians need to meet the businesspeople halfway, and show wisdom, foresight and flexibility. We need to regain trust in Russian-European relations and to restore the level of interaction,” Putin said.
Russia, EU pledge to continue dialogue despite sanctions
European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker said at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum on Thursday that Russia and the EU should continue their dialogue, despite the sanctions.
“We can have no illusions about the problems weighing on our relationship today. They exist,” Juncker said, adding that it would be “pointless, even dangerous, to ignore them.”
“We must tackle them urgently,” he said, adding that the dialogue should begin with discussing the Minsk agreements on solving the Ukraine crisis, and ensuring the norms and rules of international law.
Russia has never courted confrontation with the West, and has always been “in favor of an equal and mutually beneficial dialogue,” Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said in response.
Russia needs a powerful country like the US, but that country should not interfere in Russian affairs and hinder the EU in building a relationship with Moscow, Putin said.
“The world needs such a powerful country like the United States, and so do we, but we do not need it [the US] to constantly interfere in our affairs, tell us how to live, hinder Europe in building ties with us,” Putin noted.
Speaking at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum on Friday, Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi said that Europe and Russia should make an effort to restore relationships.
“It is obvious that there are some problems in the Europe-Russia relationships, and it is clear that each of us has good reasons to think about the past, about why these problems occurred,” Renzi said.
“I find it fundamentally important that at this stage, the stage we go through these days, given all the challenges we currently face, we unite our efforts and try to solve this problem, looking into the future, and what we have in common,” he added.
R.T
R.S

Related Video







Related articles
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Putin at St. Petersburg International Economic Forum

Called Russia’s Davos, this year’s SPIEF (its 20th annual forum) is one of its “most extensive,” according to Tass, featuring three days of over 100 events – from June 16 – 18.
Attending are representatives of 600 Russian and 500 foreign companies from 60 countries, including America and EU ones – to the displeasure of Washington, wanting Russia increasingly isolated, marginalized, weakened, and transformed into a US vassal state.
Addressing SPIEF’s plenary session, Putin’s remarks were wide-ranging, discussing “systemic problems…besetting the global economy and practically all countries,” as well as expressing an eagerness to restore normalized relations with EU countries, disrupted by hostile US policy.
“We do not hold a grudge, and are ready to meet our European partners halfway. But it certainly cannot be a one-way game,” he stressed.
“Our recent meetings with representatives of the German and French business circles have proved that the European business is willing and is ready to cooperate with our country,” he added.
“Politicians need to meet the business people halfway, and show wisdom, foresight and flexibility. We need to regain trust in Russian-European relations and to restore the level of interaction.”
Throughout his tenure as Russian president, Putin stressed resolving conflicts diplomatically, multi-world polarity and mutual cooperation among all nations – far different from Washington’s imperial agenda, permanent wars its core policy, along with bullying other nations to comply with its will.
Putin noted US pressure on EU countries to maintain sanctions on Russia, gaining nothing, harming their own economies, angering their business communities wanting them lifted.
“Why tolerate (them),” he asked? “I don’t understand.” America isn’t suffering economically like EU countries.
While expressing a willingness to work cooperatively with Washington, he stressed how its unilateral hostility and belligerence cause chaos.
“If the policy of unilateral actions goes on, if steps in the international scene, very sensitive for the international community, are not coordinated, such (negative) consequences will be inevitable,” he explained.
“If we turn an attentive ear to each other, if we look for a balance of interest, this will not happen. If there is such cooperation, nobody will ever talk about any Cold War…I am certain that nobody wishes that.”
After Soviet Russia dissolved in 1991, his hoped for “universal prosperity and trust” never materialized.
He knows it’s unattainable as long as bipartisan neocons infest Washington – wanting adversarial, not cooperative relations.
A Final Comment
Politicizing sports is longstanding, especially high-profile international events getting worldwide coverage.
On Friday, the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) took perhaps an unprecedented step in upholding an earlier ban on Russian track and field athletes, based on alleged doping violations – barring them all from this summer’s August 5 – 21 Rio Olympic Games (Rio 2016).
Collectively punishing a nation’s athletes for the misdeeds of a few team members smacks of deplorably politicizing sports, delegitimizing them, relegating them to competition among chosen nations, excluding others for unacceptable reasons.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.
Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

USA’s NATO Exposed as ISIS Springboard into Syria

June 14, 2016 (Tony Cartalucci – NEO) – Kurdish fighters allegedly backed by the US, have crossed the Euphrates River in Syria and have moved against fighters from the self-proclaimed “Islamic State” (ISIS) holding the city of Manbij. The city is about 20 miles from Jarabulus, another Syrian city located right on the Syrian-Turkish border. Jarabulus too is held by ISIS.
The initial push toward Manbij came from the Tishrin Dam in the south, however, another front was opened up and is hooking around the city’s north – successfully cutting off the city and its ISIS defenders from roads leading to the Turkish border – including Route 216 running between Manbij and Jarabulus.
Planning an assault on an urban center requires that an attacking force cut off city defenders from their logistical routes. Doing so prevents the enemy from fleeing and regrouping, but also diminishes the enemy’s fighting capacity during the assault. It is clear that the fighters moving in on ISIS in Manbij have determined that Jarabulus and Turkey just beyond the border, constitutes the source of ISIS’ fighting capacity.
Western Media Admits ISIS Entering Syria From Turkey 
Jarabulus is increasingly being referred to across the Western media as the “last ISIS border-crossing point into Turkey.” A 2015 article written by the Guardian’s Jonathan Steele titled, “The Syrian Kurds Are Winning!,” would explain that (emphasis added):
In July of this year the YPG, again with the aid of US airpower, drove ISIS out of Tal Abyad, another town on the border with Turkey. This meant ISIS had lost two of the three crossing points from Turkey through which it could bring foreign volunteers, finance, and weaponry to strengthen the jihad. 

Idriss Nassan, the Kurdish spokesperson of the Kobanî canton, told me thatthe YPG now plans to liberate the last ISIS border-crossing point into Turkey at the town of Jarabulus.
Steeles’ article gives the impression that the US was actually trying to stop ISIS by helping the Kurds wage war inside of Syria. However Steele, for whatever reason, never addresses his own implications that ISIS is literally being reinforced from Turkey – a NATO-member since the 1950’s which hosts a US Air Force base at Incirlik, and who has allowed US, British, French, and Persian Gulf state intelligence agencies and special forces to operate along its border with Syria with impunity since the conflict began.
Image: The northern hook has since completely cut off the city of Manbij (upper-left) from ISIS-held Jarabulus and the Turkish border in the north. 
More recently, in a Washington Times article titled, “Turkey offers joint ops with U.S. forces in Syria, wants Kurds cut out,” it would quote the Turkish Foreign Minister himself admitting (emphasis added):
Joint operations between Washington and Ankara in Manbji, a well-known waypoint forIslamic State fighters, weapons and equipment coming from Turkey bound for Raqqa,would effectively open “a second front” in the ongoing fight to drive the Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL, from Syria’s borders, [Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu] said.
The Foreign Minister of Turkey admits that ISIS forces – fighters, weapons, and equipment – are pouring out of Turkey’s own territory “bound for Raqqa,” but never explains how the most notorious terrorist organization of the 21st century could move enough men and materiel through a NATO-member state to wage an entire war with, without being stopped before reaching Syria. Also not explained is where ISIS is procuring the weapons that it is moving through Turkey.
It is a reality that directly and damningly implicates Turkey and its allies as state sponsors of terrorism, and calls into question both the legitimacy and relevance of NATO itself. At the very least – NATO is exposed as a military alliance so impotent that it cannot even secure its own territory from being used as a springboard for full-scale ISIS military operations.
US-NATO Harbored, Protected ISIS for Years 
It should be noted that as a “collective act” by NATO, at one point in the conflict, the United States and Germany would even place Patriot missile systems along the Turkish-Syrian border to discourage Syrian aviation from approaching too close – a strategic reality that did not shift until Russia began its own direct military intervention in the conflict on Damascus’ behalf, as Defense News reported at the time.
In retrospect – it appears that both the US and Turkey were complicit in ensuring Syrian efforts to interdict terrorists including ISIS were ineffective – establishing what was essentially a defacto buffer zone inhabited by among other groups – Al Qaeda’s Al Nusra Front and ISIS itself.
Image: Russian airstrikes ended the impunity with which ISIS supply networks moved from Turkey into Syria.
Russia’s entry into the war and its subsequent operations directly along the Syrian-Turkish borderdisrupted ISIS’ logistical support from NATO-territory and has been the primary factor leading to ISIS’ weakening within Syria.
Time is Up for the West’s Narrative 
With the Western media itself now admitting ISIS is crossing into Syria from Turkey – even without explaining the obvious context and implications this has for both Turkey and NATO  – it will become quickly apparent to all that more should be done by Turkey and NATO to contain ISIS within Turkey itself, rather than beyond Turkey’s border with Syria.
For the United States in particular to have substantial military assets located in Turkey for its Syrian operations, but appear oblivious to the ISIS threat passing by its own troops, intelligence officers, and military trainers and advisers, will become an act even the most naive Americans and Europeans will find difficult to believe.
In the meantime, efforts to continue securing Syria’s borders, north and south, must be made in order to confront the West’s proxies on the battlefield. Meanwhile, across information space, efforts must be made to continue raising awareness that a war fought by fighters moving from one country into another is not a “civil war,” it is a foreign invasion – and those nations participating in it along the invaded nation’s borders must be held accountable.
Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially for the online magazine New Eastern Outlook”.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Moscow Warns Washington against Striking Syrian Army Forces

18-06-2016 | 10:16

The Kremlin has strongly warned Washington against striking Syrian government forces, saying it would fuel turmoil across the entire region.

Russian President Vladimir Putin


President Vladimir Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Friday that an attempt to topple the Syrian government “wouldn’t help a successful fight against terrorism and could plunge the region into total chaos.”
Peskov made the statement while asked to comment about an internal document in which dozens of US State Department employees called for military action against the Syrian Army.
This comes as the US administration sought Friday to contain fallout from the leaked internal memo, but showed no sign it was willing to consider military strikes against the Syrian army.
Several US officials said that while the White House is prepared to hear the diplomats’ dissenting viewpoint, it is not expected to spur any changes in President Barack Obama’s approach to Syria in his final seven months in office.
One senior official said that the test for whether these proposals for more aggressive action are given high-level consideration will be whether they “fall in line with our contention that there is no military solution to the conflict in Syria.”
The document was sent through the State Department’s “dissent channel,” a conduit for voicing contrary opinions meant to be classified.
White House spokeswoman Jen Friedman said Obama is open to a “robust discussion” on Syria but she insisted that deliberations by Obama’s national security team have already taken a very close look at a range of options.
A former senior US official said the unauthorized disclosure of a confidential cable of this type “corrodes the trust between the president and those who serve him.” Other US officials pointed out that the cable does not carry the signatures of any senior State Department officials, such as assistant or deputy secretaries or ambassadors.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!