Monday, 22 August 2016
Ernst Nolte-The Last German
An Obituary by Gilad Atzmon
In his book Heidegger and the Jews, the French philosopher François Léotard contends that history may promise to narrate the past, but what it does instead is conceal our collective shame. American history conceals slavery and genocidal American militancy, Brits attempt to cover their imperial crimes and Jewish history covers the astonishing fact that Jews are uniquely skilled in bringing disasters on themselves. The real historian, according to Léotard, is the one who unveils the shame and exposes it to the light. The real historian is a philosopher – an essentialist who introduces logos to an epoch that initially conveys itself as ‘irrational.’ Like a psychoanalyst, the real historian removes layer after layer of repressed shame aspiring toward reason, coherence and the truth.
Professor Ernst Nolte, who died last Thursday (93), was a real historian. This makes sense, during the Second World War, Nolte was a student of the great Martin Heidegger.
Nolte was probably the first post war academic to break taboos against equating Nazism with Bolshevism. He was immediately denounced by the conventional academic institutions as an ‘apologist for Hitler’ and a ‘Holocaust denier.’ However, most of Nolte’s findings that were revolutionary in the 1960-80s are now accepted by most historians as a valid understanding of German National Socialism.
Nolte, found himself in a ferocious battle with the academic establishment in 1986 for suggesting that the Germans’ inclination towards National Socialism was a natural response to the ‘existential threat’ posed by Bolshevism. He also compared Hitler’s brutality towards Jews and other minorities with Stalin’s mass killings. Nolte was correct that Stalin’s brutality towards mass populations predated Hitler’s oppressive measures towards people he identified as enemies of the state. “Did the ‘Gulag Archipelago’ not exist before Auschwitz?” Nolte asked in his 1986 Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) article.
Nolte attempted to examine German shame in a search for logos in German modern history. In fact, that logos is more relevant now than ever. Nolte realised in the 1960s that fascism was the great anti-movement: it was anti-liberal, anti-communist, anti-capitalist, and anti-bourgeois. It opposed modernity. It is Nolte’s inclination towards logos in understanding fascism that helps us interpret the popularity of Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump. Both men are regarded by their followers as a counter force to the mommonite/oligarch establishment.
Unlike Wilhelm Riech and the Frankfurt School enthusiasts who came to the ludicrous conclusion that Germans favoured National Socialism over Marxist revolution because they were ‘sexually repressed’ and inclined towards authoritarianism, Nolte bravely revisited the past and discovered that it made a lot more sense than most of us were willing to admit at the time.
As one might predict, being a real historian didn’t make Nolte’s life easy. Immediately after the publication of his FAZ article he became subject to an orchestrated onslaught led by Jewish academics and others. One of Nolte’s bitterest enemies in Germany was the notorious Frankfurt School shabbos goy Jürgen Habermas who accused Nolte of “grossly apologetic tendencies.” If history were left to Habermas and his Frankfurt School idols we would still blame German sexual repression for WWII and the rise of Hitler.
Professor Nolte wasn’t an admirer of Hitler. He consistently condemned Nazism. However, Nolte did react with interest to Fred Leuchter and Germar Rudolf ‘s reports that questioned the scientific possibility of the homicidal use of the gas chambers in Auschwitz. If history is there to narrate the past, such a narrative must evolve and shift as time passes, more facts come to light and we can reconsider what happened and rewrite the past accordingly.
The real historian is a person who transcends temporality and introduces rationality where it has been lacking. Nolte replaced the absurd notion of ‘collective authoritarian psychosis’ with historicity. He did it all by essentialism. Thus, Nolte, the real German Historian was quicker than others to see Israel for what it is. In his 1991 book “Historical Thinking in the 20th Century,” he referred to Israel as an“extraordinary state” and warned that it could become fascist and commit genocide against Palestinians.
To his last day Professor Nolte was unrepentant, he said what he believed to be true.
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
All Children’s Lives Matter (including the ones in Western Aleppo)
Posted on August 20, 2016
The western media seem to show sympathy for children in a very selective manner. As these two videos demonstrate, children don’t seem to get much attention when they get bombed by “moderate rebels.” Shrapnel fire tearing into the bodies of kids in government-controlled western Aleppo gets met with a decidedly ho-hum response from the media, as the video report above shows…and in the video below we branch into other conflict areas, including the war in Yemen, where similar scenes, once again, don’t seem to make it onto the media’s radar…
The spin given by the western media to the “boy in the ambulance” story is that Russia is to blame, which of course puts pressure on the Russians to agree to another ceasefire–another ceasefire that will give the terrorists time to re-equip, rearm, and replenish their ranks, this coming conveniently just as the tide was once again starting to turn against them.
By the way, two websites have put up posts with evidence suggesting the video of the boy may well be staged. The Aleppo Media Center, supposedly the source of the video, is covered by Off-Guardian, which dug up a two-year-old Facebook post that casts the organization in a rather dubious light. In a second post,here, Off-Guardian also publishes a series of photos of “Mahmoud Raslan,” the “photojournalist” quoted extensively by the mainstream media. One of the photos shows Raslan pictured with a group of men, a couple of whom look strikingly similar to those who show up in a video that made news back in July–showing the gruesome beheading of 12-year-old Abdullah Issa. (Portions of that video are shown in the second RT report above. You can also gohere to view a post I put up about it at the time.)
Moon of Alabama has also put up a post delving into the issue of how head wounds typically bleed profusely and why the blood on the head of the small boy in the orange ambulance seat looks as if it were painted on.
“When I rode ambulances as a first-responder, people with head wounds always bled like stuck pigs,” comments Moon of Alabama.
Whether the whole thing was or wasn’t staged is perhaps to some degree beside the point. The bottom line is that the lives of all children matter–not just those whose sufferings can be exploited for propaganda purposes by western media.
Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
Ankara sent deputy intel chief to Damascus, reports
Update
One of the deputies of Turkey’s intelligence chief has visited Syrian capital of Damascus, according to a recent report in the Lebanese As-Safir daily.
A deputy of Hakan Fidan, head of Turkey’s National Intelligence Organization (MİT) met with high level Syrian intelligence officials in Damascus, As-Safir claimed.
The meetings reportedly focused on recent developments in northern Syria, reported the daily basing its story on “credible sources.”
The alleged visit by the Turkish intelligence official to Damascus came a day afterTurkish Prime Minister Binali Yıldırım gave warm messages acknowledging a role for Syrian President Bashar Assad during a transitional period in Syria.
Speaking to media representatives in İstanbul on Saturday, Yıldırım said Turkey expects to become a more active partner in regional efforts involving war-torn Syria and is willing to accept Syrian President Assad only in a transitional role.
“Could Syria carry Assad in the long term?” Yıldırım said. “Certainly not.”
Turkey, which has not sent an official envoy to Syria since 2011 when a civil war broke out in the country, has been a vigorous supporter of the removal of the Assad government so far.
Yıldırım’s recent remarks signaled a shift for Ankara with a possible alliance with Assad
Related Videos
Related Articles
- المتاهة التركية
- عندما يصبح مستقبل أردوغان بيد الأسد
- ثلاثة اسباب تدفع بالرئيس اردوغان للعودة الى التحالف مع الاسد.. ما هي؟
- أنقرة تدعو إلى تطهير الحدود السّوريّة – التّركيّة من “داعش”
- الخارجية الإيرانية: لم يتم تحديد موعد زيارة أردوغان لطهران
- تركيا | أنقرة تكسب التضامن الدولي ضد «كل الإرهاب»
- أميركا تنقل أسلحتها النووية من تركيا إلى رومانيا
- عن مستقبل تركيا بعد هيمنة أردوغان
- Hezbollah Denounces Turkey Wedding Attack, Calls for Unity in Fighting Terrorism
- Turkey says Syria border region must be ‘cleansed’ of IS jihadists
- Putin Offers Condolences to Erdogan Over Deadly Wedding Blast
- Hezbollah Strikes Nusra Militants along Northeast Border
- 50 Killed in Wedding Blast in Southeastern Turkey
- S. Nasrallah: Hezbollah Will Emerge from Syria War as an International Force
- Turkey Goes ahead with Post-Coup Crackdown: Dozens of Academics Arrested
- Hezbollah Urges Lebanese Government to Defend National Sovereignty
- Turkey Launches Mass Raids against ’Gulen-Linked’ Businesses
Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
Western support keeps the Saudi & ISIS head choppers in business
How the West is Complicit in Nurturing Islamic Radicalism
Without Western support, the Persian Gulf’s petro-monarchies would not be able to rule over their forcefully suppressed and disenfranchised populations.

President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama walk with King Salman bin Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia at Erga Palace in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Jan. 27, 2015. (Pete Souza/White House)
The pivotal role played by the Wahhabi-Salafi ideology in radicalizing Muslims all over the world is an indisputable fact; this Wahhabi-Salafi creed has been generously sponsored by Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Arab States since the 1973 oil embargo, when the price of oil quadrupled and the contribution of the Arab petro-sheikhs towards the “spiritual well-being” of Muslims all over the world magnified proportionally.
However, the Arab autocrats are in turn propped up by the Western powers since the Cold War; thus syllogistically speaking, the root cause of Islamic radicalism has been the neocolonial powers’ manipulation of the socio-political life of the Arabs specifically, and the Muslims generally, in order to exploit their energy resources in the context of an energy-starved industrialized world. This is the principal theme of this essay which I shall discuss in detail in the following paragraphs.
Peaceful or not, Islam is only a religion just like any other cosmopolitan religion whether it’s Christianity, Buddhism or Hinduism. Instead of taking an essentialist approach, which lays emphasis on essences, we need to look at the evolution of social phenomena in its proper historical context. For instance: to assert that human beings are evil by nature is an essentialist approach; it overlooks the role played by nurture in grooming human beings. Human beings are only intelligent by nature, but they are neither good nor evil by nature; whatever they are, whether good or evil, is the outcome of their nurture or upbringing.
Similarly, to pronounce that Islam is a retrogressive or violent religion is an essentialist approach; it overlooks how Islam and the Quranic verses are interpreted by its followers depending on the subject’s socio-cultural context. For example: the Western expat Muslims who are brought up in the West and who have imbibed the Western values would interpret a Quranic verse in a liberal fashion; an urban middle class Muslim of the Muslim-majority countries would interpret the same verse rather conservatively; and a rural-tribal Muslim who has been indoctrinated by the radical clerics would find meanings in it which could be extreme. It is all about culture rather than religion or scriptures per se.
Islam is regarded as the fastest growing religion of the 20th and 21st centuries. There are two factors responsible for this atavistic phenomena of Islamic resurgence: firstly, unlike Christianity which is more idealistic, Islam is a more practical religion, it does not demand from its followers to give up worldly pleasures but only insists on regulating them; and secondly, Islam as a religion and ideology has the world’s richest financiers.
After the 1973 collective Arab oil embargo against the West, the price of oil quadrupled; the Arabs petro-sheikhs now have so much money that they are needlessly spending it on building skyscrapers, luxury hotels, theme parks and resort cities. This opulence in the oil-rich Gulf Arab States is the reason why we are witnessing an exponential growth of Islamic charities and madrassahs all over the world and especially in the Islamic World.
Although, it is generally assumed that the Arab sheikhs of the oil-rich Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait and some emirates of UAE sponsor the Wahhabi-Salafi sect of Islam, but the difference between numerous sects of Sunni Islam is more nominal than substantive. The charities and madrassahs belonging to all the Sunni denominations get generous funding from the Gulf States as well as the Gulf-based private donors.
All the recent wars and conflicts aside, the unholy alliance between the Americans and the Wahhabi-Salafis of the Persian Gulf’s petro-monarchies is much older. The British stirred up uprising in Arabia by instigating the Sharifs of Mecca to rebel against the Ottoman rule during the First World War. After the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, the British Empire backed King Abdul Aziz (Ibn-e-Saud) in his struggle against the Sharifs of Mecca; because the latter were demanding too much of a price for their loyalty: that is, the unification of the whole of Arabia under their suzerainty.
King Abdul Aziz defeated the Sharifs and united his dominions into the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 1932 with the support of the British. However, by then the tide of British Imperialism was subsiding and the Americans inherited the former possessions and the rights and liabilities of the British Empire.
At the end of the Second World War on 14 February 1945, President Franklin D. Roosevelt held a historic meeting with King Abdul Aziz at Great Bitter Lake in the Suez canal onboard USS Quincy, and laid the foundations of an enduring American-Saudi alliance which persists to this day; despite many ebbs and flows and some testing times, especially in the wake of the 9/11 tragedy when 15 out of 19 hijackers of the 9/11 plot turned out to be Saudi citizens. During the course of that momentous Great Bitter Lake meeting, among other things, it was decided to set up the United States Military Training Mission (USMTM) to Saudi Arabia to “train, advise and assist” the Saudi Arabian Armed Forces.
Apart from USMTM, the US-based Vinnell Corporation, which is a private military company based in the US and a subsidiary of the Northrop Grumman, used over a thousand Vietnam War veterans to train and equip the 125,000 strong Saudi Arabian National Guards (SANG) which does not comes under the authority of the Saudi Ministry of Defense and which plays the role of the Praetorian Guards of the House of Saud.
Moreover, the Critical Infrastructure Protection Force, whose strength is numbered in tens of thousands, is also being trained and equipped by the US to guard the critical Saudi oil infrastructure along its eastern Persian Gulf coast where 90% of Saudi oil reserves are located. Furthermore, the US has numerous air bases and missile defense systems currently operating in the Persian Gulf States and also a naval base in Bahrain where the Fifth Fleet of the US Navy is based.
The point that I am trying to make is that left to their own resources, the Persian Gulf’s petro-monarchies lack the manpower, the military technology and the moral authority to rule over not only the forcefully suppressed and disenfranchised Arab masses, but also the South Asian and African immigrants of the Gulf Arab states.
One-third of the Saudi Arabian population is comprised of immigrants; similarly, more than 75% of UAE’s population also consists of immigrants from Pakistan, Bangladesh, India and Sri Lanka; and all the other Gulf Arab States also have a similar proportion of immigrants from the developing countries; moreover, unlike the immigrants in the Western countries who hold the citizenship status, the Gulf’s immigrants have lived there for decades and sometimes for generations, and they are still regarded as unentitled foreigners.
Notwithstanding, it is generally believed that political Islam is the precursor to Islamic extremism and terrorism; however, there are two distinct and separate types of political Islam: the despotic political Islam of the Gulf variety and the democratic political Islam of the Turkish and the Muslim Brotherhood variety. The latter Islamist organization never had a chance to rule over Egypt, except for a brief year long stint; therefore, it would be unwise to draw any conclusions from such a brief period of time in history.
The Turkish variety of political Islam, the oft-quoted “Turkish model,” however, is worth emulating all over the Islamic World. I do understand that political Islam in all of its forms and manifestations is an anathema to the liberal sensibilities, but it is the ground reality of the Islamic world. The liberal dictatorships, no matter how benevolent, had never worked in the past, and they will meet the same fate in the future.
The mainspring of Islamic extremism and militancy isn’t the moderate and democratic political Islam, because why would people turn to violence when they can exercise their right to choose their rulers? The mainspring of Islamic militancy is the despotic and militant political Islam of the Gulf variety. The Western powers are fully aware of this fact, so why do they choose to support the same Arab autocrats that have nurtured extremism and terrorism when the ostensible and professed goal of the Western policymakers is to eliminate Islamic radicalism and militancy?
It’s because this has been a firm policy principle of the Western powers to promote “stability” in the Middle East rather than representative democracy. They are fully cognizant of the ground reality that the mainstream Muslim sentiment is firmly against any Western military presence and interference in the Middle East region. Additionally, the Western policymakers also prefer to deal with small groups of Middle Eastern strongmen rather than cultivating a complex and uncertain relationship on a popular level; certainly a myopic approach which is the hallmark of the so-called “pragmatic” politicians and statesmen.
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
USA supplied Saudi hits another school in Yemen (Updated)

واشنطن تحاول «غسل يديها» من المجازر السعودية: دعمنا «ليس شيكاً على بياض»
A school in the province of Taiz in the Yemeni highlands has been hit by a Saudi airstrike with no reports just yet on the amount of casualties, if any.
Saudi Arabia for the duration of its aggression which began in late 2015 has systematically targeted schools, hospitals, refugee camps and other civilian infrastructure.
According to Yemen’s al-Masirah television, the air raid hit the al-Rawd school in the district of Dabab in western Ta’izz early on Monday.
A March 13 article on The New York Times cited “American officials” as pointing to “the ability of Saudi pilots, who were inexperienced in flying missions… and fearful of enemy ground fire.”
“As a result,” the article read, “they (the pilots) flew at high altitudes to avoid the threat below. But flying high also reduced the accuracy of their bombing and increased civilian casualties, American officials said.”
“American advisers suggested how the pilots could safely fly lower, among other tactics. But the airstrikes still landed on markets, homes, hospitals, factories and ports, and are responsible for the majority of the [then] 3,000 civilian deaths during the yearlong war, according to the United Nations,” the Times article further read.
Other reports suggest that at least 10,000 people have been killed so far because of the Saudi-sponsored aggression
Saudi Arabia Hits another School in Yemen, Saudi Pilots ‘Cowards’
Saudi pilots have launched yet another airstrike on a school in the Yemeni province of Ta’izz, with no information immediately available on possible casualties.
According to Yemen’s al-Masirah television, the air raid hit the al-Rawd school in the district of Dabab in western Ta’izz early on Monday.
In the war Saudi Arabia has launched on Yemen, the Saudi forces have been targeting schools, hospitals, residential buildings, roads, markets and refugee camps.
Reports by media outlets in the United States — which has offered intelligence support for the Saudi war by helping Saudi forces acquire “targets” — have pointed to the incompetence as well as cowardice on the part of the Saudi pilots conducting airstrikes as some of the reasons why indiscriminate bombing occurs in Yemen.
A March 13 article on The New York Times cited “American officials” as pointing to “the ability of Saudi pilots, who were inexperienced in flying missions… and fearful of enemy ground fire.”
“As a result,” the article read, “they (the pilots) flew at high altitudes to avoid the threat below. But flying high also reduced the accuracy of their bombing and increased civilian casualties, American officials said.”
“American advisers suggested how the pilots could safely fly lower, among other tactics. But the airstrikes still landed on markets, homes, hospitals, factories and ports, and are responsible for the majority of the [then] 3,000 civilian deaths during the yearlong war, according to the United Nations,” the Times article further read.
In the previous instance of indiscriminate bombing, scores of students were killed and injured in a Saudi airstrike against an elementary school in the province of Sa’ada less than a week ago.
On Friday, the US military said it had sharply reduced the number of its forces working with Saudi Arabia in the war on Yemen.
While some US officials have sought to distance the decision to downgrade military cooperation with Saudi Arabia from the rising outcry over the mounting civilian deaths caused in Yemen, Pentagon spokesman Adam Stump said on Friday that the US military support for the Saudi war on Yemen “does not mean that we will refrain from expressing our concern about the war in Yemen and how it has been waged.”
Source: Press TV
| 22-08-2016 – 11:17 Last updated 22-08-2016 – 11:17 |
Related Videos
Related Articles
- «أطباء بلا حدود» تخلي شمالي اليمن بعد مجزرة حجة
- «ترانزيت» إجباري في مطار بيشه: الرياض تتعمد إذلال اليمنيين
- واشنطن ولندن «متواطئتان» في مجازر التحالف السعودي
- الجيش يسيطر على جبال يام الاستراتيجية شرقي صنعاء
- Yemenis Kill Three Saudi Troops in Retaliatory Missile Attack
- Children Paying ‘Heaviest Price’ of Yemen War: UNICEF
- Yemen Airports Close amid Intensified Saudi Raids
- Yemen’s Ansarullah Bloc Sets up Governing Council
- Human Rights Group: Bombs Made in UK Dropped on Yemeni Civilians
- Yemenis Hit Saudi base with Katyusha Rockets in Retaliatory Attack
- Iran Says UN Betrayed Yemeni children by De-listing Saudi Arabia
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
‘Western Propaganda is Paid for in Syrian Blood’
Posted on August 21, 2016
Vanessa Beeley Interviews Syrian Government Advisor Dr. Bouthaina Shaaban
By Vanessa Beeley
“The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history.” ~ George Orwell.
The media furor surrounding the now viral image of wounded Syrian child, Omran Daqneesh, in terrorist-held eastern Aleppo, Syria is still raging, while the push back against the tide of western-sponsored anti-Syrian State propaganda reveals itself to be strengthening with each new spike in pro-terrorist hyperbole designed to provoke a knee-jerk foreign policy response that is either advocating a “No Fly Zone”, or some form of escalation foreign military intervention inside of Syria.
Today I had the honour to meet with Dr Bouthaina Shaaban, political and media advisor to Syrian President Bashar al Assad. We discussed many issues including this most recent heart wrenching image that is appearing across all main stream media channels. As we opened the discussion, Dr Shaaban said immediately:
“We are paying for this propaganda with our blood.”
Dr Shaaban went on to describe how the “corporate media is distorting reality in Syria“, while also explaining why she was reluctant at the beginning of the NATO member and allies war on Syria, to speak to western mainstream media:
“They came here with accusatory questions, they didn’t come here to know what is going on. They came here to ask me why are you working with a man who is ‘killing his own people.’ What an ugly start for an interview. I said there is no point, they come here to gain credibility but only to re-confirm their own story rather than to find out what is really going on. I didn’t want to be used to ‘re-confirm’ their own story or to give them credibility.”
Dr Shaaban believes that there is a need to ensure voices like hers that resonate with passion for her country and its people, which should be heard across a far wider range of media platforms to counter what might be described as a vast Zionist and Gulf State (GCC) funded media network that is driving the propaganda train though the US and Europe. Dr Shaaban mentioned a weekly column that she is writing in Arabic and suggested that perhaps she should translate it for English media.
What follows is the transcript of Dr Shaaban’s statements on various subjects:
Why is our country being destroyed?
“I wrote that really we are going through a third world war, without naming it a third world war but this time it’s a global war between two projects and two ways of thinking – between western concepts that they want to promote: their own way of life, their own ideology, their own way of thinking even at the expense of other lives and the innocence of our countries while the old civilisations like the Chinese, the Indian, the Arab civilisation are struggling to keep their identity and to pass this identity to their children and grand-childrenPersonally I no longer believe that the way the system is working in the west has any ‘democracy’ for us, or has any ‘human rights’ for us, or that there is any ‘free press’ for us in their official media system. If you know how we feel now you would be really surprised.I have two daughters and a son. One daughter is doing a PhD in architecture in London and the other is doing a PhD in the US in international relations and politics. The one in London has a three year old girl, the one in the States has a four year old boy. They have been here for a month, every time they go to the Old City, they come back crying. They say, is it possible that our children cannot live the way we lived, cannot know the Syria we knew, cannot enjoy the Syria we enjoyed? Why?Why are we being prevented from passing on our experience, our culture, our livelihood to our children? Why are our families being destroyed? Why is our country being destroyed? This is a daily struggle for our children. My children take their children and show them everything because they are afraid that tomorrow this will not be here anymore.This is a terrible thing to happen to any country, to any people on earth. We have the right to live the way we think, to live our own culture. You might find Paris exciting, I find Damascus the most beautiful place on earth. This is us, this is who we are. I was asked many times to leave as an Ambassador but I cannot leave Damascus, can you believe it? I do not want to live one year out of Damascus, I can never get enough of this city.So, leave us alone – that is really our message and unfortunately the calculus of politics in the west has no consideration whatsoever for the way people feel or for their aspirations.”
Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
Iran Showcases Defense Achievements, Releases Images of New Missile System
Iran Aviation Industries Organization (IAIO) displayed on Sunday latest achievements in air defense technology, including fighter and transport aircraft, helicopters as well as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with the presence of President Hasan Rouhani.
Rouhani visited a Defense Ministry exhibition showcasing the latest achievements in the air defense industry, including the domestically-built Bavar-373 air defense system on the occasion of National Defense Industry Day.
Accompanied by Defense Minister Brigadier General Hossein Dehqan, the president was briefed on the progress in the designing and manufacturing of the first national Turbojet engine.
The Iranian chief executive further visited different sectors involved in the production of the long-range Bavar-373 air defense system, which has been designed and constructed by Defense Ministry scientists and experts with the cooperation of the Khatam al-Anbia Air Defense Base as well as scientific and investigative centers.
The system was designed to intercept cruise missiles, drones, combat aircraft and ballistic missiles, according to earlier statements by Dehghan.
The project was launched as an alternative to the Russian S-300 system, the delivery of which was suspended in 2010 due to sanctions imposed over Iran’s nuclear program.
“We did not intend to make an Iranian version of the S-300 — we wanted to build an Iranian system, and we built it,” Dehghan told the IRNA news agency over the weekend.
In recent years, Iran has made major breakthroughs in its defense sector and attained self-sufficiency in producing important military equipment and systems.
Source: Websites
| 21-08-2016 – 12:54 Last updated 21-08-2016 – 12:54 |
Related Articles
- Iran Received Full Package of S-300: DM
- Iran Ready for ‘Decisive Battle’ with US
- US Fires Head of Navy Team Arrested by Iran in Persian Gulf
- No Halt to Iran Defensive Bids, Missile Tests: Dehqan
- Iran Test-fires Long-range Ballistic Missile: Report
- Iran ‘Highly Dangerous’ for Foes: IRGC Commander
- S-300 Unveiled in National Army Day, Rouhani: Strong Army Safeguards Iran
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
China Joins Russia in Syria War? “Enhanced Military Aid” against US Sponsored Terrorists?
Global Research, August 22, 2016

A lot rides on defeating US imperialism in Syria. The fate of the region and beyond hangs in the balance.
If Syria goes, Iran is next, a war if initiated by Washington far more potentially consequential and devastating.
Iran’s population alone makes it an important regional country – four times the size of Syria at around 80 million. Imagine the possible war-related death, injury and displacement toll.
Transforming the Islamic Republic into a US vassal state would give America and Israel unchallenged Middle East dominance.
Russian and Chinese regional influence would wane or be eliminated. The loss of Syrian and Iranian sovereignty would greatly aid the scourge of US imperialism worldwide – Moscow and Beijing the key independent powers standing in the way of its global dominance.
Nuclear war would be more likely with the aim of letting America colonize planet earth unopposed if triumphant, provided nuclear devastation and radiation poisoning didn’t kill us all – why nuclear confrontation is so crucial to prevent. The potential consequences should terrify everyone.
Vladimir Putin is committed to defeating the scourge of US-supported terrorism in Syria, mainly concerned about preventing its spread to Russia’s heartland – at the same time wanting the Syrian Arab Republic’s sovereignty and territorial integrity preserved.
During an August 15 meeting with his German counterpart, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said “(w)e believe that it is still necessary not to allow international terrorist entities to prevail here, and to ensure the beginning of genuine and true negotiations between all Syrian sides.”
It’s alarming that many so-called (US-supported) moderate (sic) (anti-government combatants) more often coordinate their actions with” Security Council-designated terrorist groups.China intends offering Syria humanitarian aid and enhanced military help. On Tuesday, People’s Liberation Army Admiral/high-ranking Defense Ministry official Guan Youfei met with Syrian Defense Minister Fahad Jasssim al-Freij and an unnamed Russian general in Damascus.Following their meeting, he issued a statement, saying “(t)he Chinese and Syrian militaries traditionally have a friendly relationship, and the Chinese military is willing to keep strengthening exchanges and cooperation with the Syrian military.
How far Beijing intends going militarily remains to be seen. It has its own terrorist problem. It’s threatened by US regional provocations, notably in the South China Sea.
Its government reportedly sent dozens of military advisors to Syria last year to aid in the fight against terrorism, stopping short of committing warplanes and/or ground forces.
Does Guan’s Tuesday visit signify Beijing intending more direct military involvement than already? Will greater East/West confrontation follow?
Flashpoint conditions in Syria could become more serious than currently. Neocon Hillary Clinton likely succeeding Obama next year could threaten world peace and stability by escalating conflict into something more dangerous than now.
A lot depends on the Syrian, Russian, Iranian, Chinese alliance against the scourge of US imperialism – maybe humanity’s fate.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached atlendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.
Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.
The original source of this article is Global Research
Copyright © Stephen Lendman, Global Research, 2016
Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
War By November? Hopefully Not, But A Few Recent Developments are Worth Noting
Posted on August 19, 2016
Six days ago I put up a post concerning comments by US military officer Scott Bennett in an interview with Press TV. Bennett told the Press TV interviewer that the Obama administration may try to trigger a confrontation with Russia in Ukraine in order to boost Hillary Clinton’s election chances in November.
“It’s very obvious to Russia, it’s very obvious to us in the intelligence community and the military, that the United States under the Obama administration is going to in most likelihood initiate some sort of a war or confrontation through the Ukrainian mercenaries, through the Ukrainian president–they’re going to initiate some sort of conflict or war with Russia in Ukraine in the Crimea before the November elections in the United States, and the reasons for that, of course, is to deteriorate support for Donald Trump and increase support for Hillary Clinton.
At the time I commented that I wasn’t sure how a war in Ukraine would really add that much momentum to Clinton’s campaign, but over the past few days the mainstream media have been laying what might be thought of as a “propaganda groundwork” toward using a war in Ukraine, should one in fact break out, as a means of derailing Trump’s election chances.
Media reports alleging ties between Trump campaign official Paul Manafort and the former Russian-backed Yanukovych government have been rife over the past few days–so much so that Manafort today announced his resignation. The allegations are that Manafort’s name appeared on “secret ledgers” supposedly recently uncovered by Ukraine’s “Anti-Corruption Bureau,” with implications that he was involved in corruption. The ledgers are claimed to contain a list of “recipients” of illegal cash disbursements, with $12.7 million said to have been designated for Manafort over the years 2007-2012. Manafort has denied he received any such payments, but the denials, of course, don’t seem to be given much credence.
Some of the media reports have been extremely vicious in tone. “Here’s How Donald Trump’s Paul Manafort Helped Create Chaos in Ukraine,” is the headline over a piece in The Daily Beast that was published yesterday. At any rate, conditions are now ripe for an enormous amount of mud being slung in Trump’s face should a war break out in Ukraine between now and election day.
So it looks like Bennett may well have well have been right on target in his analysis.
A few other recent developments are also worth keeping in mind:
- As the video above notes, Ukraine is amassing forces along the border with Crimea as well as along the contact line in Donbass; likewise Russia, too, is beefing up forces in the conflict area, including deployment to Crimea of its advanced S-400 missile system, while also carrying out military exercises;
- Chinese troops are being sent to Syria, ostensibly for training and humanitarian purposes only;
- Russian planes are now launching what appear to be daily airstrikes into Syria from a base in Iran;
- Russia and China are scheduled to hold military drills in the South China Sea in September;
- Russian military drills recently included an exercise in which loudspeakers carried a female voice telling NATO soldiers, “You are being lied to! You are not peacekeepers! Lay down your arms!” The voice also told them to “stop being pawns for your leaders.” (It’s only a training exercise, but the ramifications are evident)
- An aerial dog fight between US and Syrian planes came close to occurring on Thursday, Aug. 18;
- Authorities in Kiev have refused to accept the credentials of a new Russian ambassador to Ukraine;
- Despite that, Putin, in a visit to Crimea today, said Russia has no plans to cut off ties to Ukraine (see video below)
The chances of war seem to be growing. I don’t want to sound alarmist, but it might be a good idea for people to start thinking about stocking up on food and bottled water. In the event we get through the election without incident, you can still eat the food and drink the water.
Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






