Sunday, 16 October 2016

U.S. bringing world to the brink of nuclear war, while Americans have been kept in the dark

zion-nuke-attack-now

U.S. bringing world to the brink of nuclear war


By Cindy Sheehan, Excerpts from TeleSur, 14/10/2016

What’s happening in Syria has been going on for over five years and it’s not a civil war.
U.S. imperialism has been exporting disaster around the world for over a century now, but not since the “Cuban” missile crisis in 1962, has the U.S. put the world on the brink of such a disaster as we are witnessing today.
The conflict began as a U.S.-funded effort to depose President Bashar Assad and install a puppet government in Damascus friendly to U.S. interests. I am sure there are some legitimate forces in Syria who oppose the government of Assad, but the U.S. does not care about democracy — afterall Assad was elected by his people.
Also in Syria, approximately one dozen militias are not only trying to overthrow the Assad government but they are also fighting amongst themselves. The ranking Democrat on the U.S. Congressional House Intelligence Committee, uber-Zionist Adam Schiff of California, said of the phenomena of CIA-funded militias fighting in places like Aleppo, “It’s part of the three-dimensional chess game.” This chess game, played by empires for millennia, profit the wealthy and as always, the people pay the heavy price.
Today we learned that China is contemplating joining Russia and Syria in their alliance to protect the sovereignty of Syria and for stabilization in the Middle East.
The U.S. has long invaded and provoked weaker countries like Afghanistan and Iraq which have little hope of retaliating but nonetheless use what resources they have to fight off U.S. imperialism. However, provoking Russia in places like Syria and Ukraine seems to be the height of arrogance and stupidity on the part of the U.S.
For many years, Russian President Vladimir Putin has been the rational actor in this insane U.S. provocation, but Russia is getting ready to fight back—reportedly holding civil defense drills, warning Russians abroad, and even testing nuclear missiles.
Some of us see no hope for the mis-leaders here in the U.S. to provide some sanity in its foreign policy. In the last U.S. presidential debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, the war criminal Clinton reaffirmed her hardcore stance to go to war with Russia, through Syria, if necessary. Clinton also declared her support for a “no fly zone” over Syria, which the chair of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Joseph Dunford said would require 70,000 U.S. troops to maintain and would definitely mean war with Russia…(…read more…)

RELATED:

U.S. Has Been Preparing for WW3,

Americans Have Been Kept in The Dark,

while Russian TV tells civilians to find out

where their nearest bomb shelter is

If the American people, those that get their “news” by reading the NYT, Washington Post, watching CNN, or some other mainstream media source, are now wondering why all of a sudden everyone is talking about war, it is because Americans have been deliberately kept in the dark over the last few years about how the U.S. government has been making prepartions for a nuclear conflict.
The MSM has trickled a little information here and there, while downplaying the importance of certain stories, such as the April 2015 news that NORAD and the Pentagon were moving their communications equipment to Stargate Mountain, the cold-war era Cheyenne Mountain bunker that’s naturally EMP-hardened. That raised massive red flags for ANP and other alternative news sites, as we warned the U.S. government was making preparations for World War III.
In June 2016, Russian President Vladimir Putin issued a severe warning to journalists, making it very clear that World War III, a nuclear war, was on our doorstep, losing patience with how the severity of the situation was being hidden from the world.
President Putin stated “We know year by year what’s going to happen, and they know that we know. It’s only you that they tell tall tales to, and you buy it, and spread it to the citizens of your countries. You people in turn do not feel a sense of the impending danger – this is what worries me. How do you not understand that the world is being pulled in an irreversible direction? While they pretend that nothing is going on. I don’t know how to get through to you anymore”.
zion-nuke-attack-now
According to the Russian site Znak.com, administration staff, regional administrators, lawmakers of all levels and employees of public corporations have been ordered to take their children out of foreign schools immediately.
Russian political analyst Stanislav Belkovsky is quoted as stating “This is all part of the package of measures to prepare elites to some ‘big war’.”
That was on October 12, 2016, and just two days later, October 14, 2016… today, we see that state run Russian television is telling civilians to find out where their nearest bomb shelter is.
One apocalyptic broadcast told viewers on Moscow’s state-owned TV channel NTV: “If it should one day happen, every one of you should know where the nearest bomb shelter is. It’s best to find out now.”

SOURCES
Excerpts from:
TeleSur
InformationClearingHouse
AllNewsPipeline
submitted by Lone Bear (Lone_Bear)
War Press Info Network at:
https://syrianfreepress.wordpress.com/2016/10/14/usa-to-nuclear-war/
~
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

A Glimpse into Jewish Guilt and Aggression

By Gilad Atzmon
Some Jews were not delighted by Donald Trump’s recent reference to ‘International Bankers”. Trump declared this week that his rival Hilary Clinton is somehow “an instrument of a vast conspiracy involving scads of money and international banks”
You may note that Trump didn’t refer to Jews nor did he point at any ethnicity or religious group. However, , the CEO of the Anti-Defamation League was quick to react using the twitter platform. “Trump should avoid rhetoric and tropes that historically have been used against Jews and still spur antisemitism,” Greenblatt said and then added “Let’s keep hate out of campaign.”  
One may wonder at this stage why a leading American Jew sees ‘hatred’ in Trump’s critical reference to ‘International Banking’?is it because Greenblatt knows that the International Bankers who fund Clinton’s presidential affair belong to one particular ethnic group? Is it possible that Greenblatt believes that the bankers at Goldman Sachs, along with individuals like Haim Saban and George Soros, may have one or two things in common apart from being filthy rich? 
The Jewish Telegraphic Agency was also alarmed by Trump’s true observation that “This election will determine if we are a free nation or whether we have only the illusion of democracy, but are in fact controlled by a small handful of global special interests rigging the system”
Once again Trump didn’t refer specifically to Jews, yet the JTA must have gathered that he had Jews in mind. The JTA probably knows something many of us may gathered but prefer to suppress.
I guess that the good news is the sudden appearance of Jewish guilt. Greenblatt and the JTA act out of guilt. They do know that international banking is a Jewish territory and that makes them feel uncomfortable.  But the tragic news is Jewish guilt hardly leads towards ethical reflection, too often it is quick to transform into aggression.
If Greenblatt was genuinely concerned with defamation and safety of American Jews he should have lobbied the herd of Jewish international bankers to remove themselves from American politics.  But for Greenblatt and others within his tribal milieu, Jewish power is the power to silence the discussion on Jewish power!
In practice, Greenblatt, an American Jewish leader, is telling the Republican presidential candidate which topics to avoid.
I would like to tell Greenblatt and his acolytes that this development is very dangerous to American people and to American Jews in particular. 

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

The Widening US-Russian Rift

Do you want total war? If necessary, do you want a war more total and radical than anything that we can even imagine today?” asked Germany’s Minister of Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, in one of his most famous speeches delivered on 18 February 1943.
US-Russia flags and Syria map
Goebbels’s so-called ‘Sportpalast speech’ came at a time when luck had started turning its back on Nazi Germany, with the Soviet liberation of Stalingrad taking place.
The high-ranking Nazi official called for decisive action, asserting that unless the Russians were defeated, Bolshevism would swallow Germany up, along with the whole of Europe.
Today, Moscow finds itself on the receiving end of similar rhetoric, now coming from the capitals of western powers, which – much like the Weimar Republic in 1943 – have come to the realization that the zenith of their military superiority has passed.
War Is Almost Guaranteed
“The established world order is undergoing a foundational shake-up… war is almost guaranteed… we will stop you and we will beat you harder than you have ever been beaten before.”
One can be forgiven for thinking that the quote above is a continuation of Goebbels’s speech. However, it was the US Army’s chief of staff, Gen. Mark A. Milley, who uttered those words.
Speaking earlier in October, Milley singled out “Russia, Iran, China, and North Korea” as countries hoping to defeat the US, warning that future warfare with a near-peer adversary will “be highly lethal, unlike anything our Army has experienced at least since World War II.”
Ramping up the rhetoric against Moscow, US Secretary of State John Kerry called for a war crimes investigation into Russian and Syrian military operations in Aleppo.
“Russia and the [Syrian] regime owe the world more than an explanation about why they keep hitting hospitals and medical facilities, and children and women,” Kerry told reporters, adding that, “these are acts that beg for an appropriate investigation of war crimes.”
Aside from the undiplomatic choice of words by the US Secretary of State to describe his Russian counterparts as ‘war criminals’, Kerry’s comments serve another purpose.
From a historical standpoint, war crimes trials are generally reserved for American adversaries that lose the war. As such, Kerry is not only implying that a direct military confrontation with the Russians is on the cards, but he is also alluding to an American victory.
The Cuban Missile Crisis at the height of the Cold War brought the world to the brink of a nuclear holocaust, marking the lowest point in relations between Moscow and Washington. But even in 1962, when the USSR was referred to as the ‘evil empire’ in the US, western officials refrained from calling for their counterparts in the Kremlin to stand trial for war crimes.
The director at The Crisis Research Institute, Mark Almond, believes that, “we have passed the stage of the initiation of the new Cold War. We are now actually in some ways in the atmosphere before the First World War.”
In late September, US State Department spokesman John Kirby suggested that if the Russian/Syrian offensive against militants continued, Moscow “will continue to send troops home in body bags, and… to lose resources, perhaps even aircraft.”
A senior expert at the Russian Institute for Strategic Studies, Sergei Ermakov, points out that, “Washington did not allow itself to make such frank statements even during the Cold War. Factually, behind Kirby’s words is a direct threat.”
Syrian Roulette
Anything and everything to do with the war in Syria is focused on the battle for Aleppo – more specifically on the eastern militant-controlled part of the city.
This city is Syria’s Stalingrad and the outcome of the battle in Aleppo will be the most significant factor in determining how the rest of the war unfolds.
This explains why the west is becoming increasingly anxious and is willing to use all of its recourses to prevent the liberation of the terrorist bastion.
The mainstream media’s hysteria about civilian casualties, which makes no mention of the Nusra Front’s stranglehold on eastern Aleppo or the group’s attacks on the western half of the city, is helping to turn the tide towards western military intervention in Syria.
The war hawks are all weighing in, including former US National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, who wrote: “To halt the relentless attacks on the innocent in Aleppo, available US power should assert its capabilities.”
So What Does This Mean Exactly?
According to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, the conflict in Syria is part of Washington’s primary goal to impose global hegemony.
“The whole issue is about keeping the hegemony of the Americans around the world, not allowing anyone to be a partner on the political or international arena, whether Russia or even their allies in the West,” the Syrian leader told the Russian Komsomolskaya Pravda newspaper.
But the Russians have responded both diplomatically and militarily.
Aside from suspending a 16-year-old deal that called for reducing stockpiles of weapons-grade plutonium, the Kremlin added the S-300 surface-to-air missile defense system to the already deployed S-400 in Syria – effectively shutting down Syrian airspace for unfriendly aircraft.
Last week, Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Maj. Gen. Igor Konashenkov warned Washington that the range of the S-300 and S-400 missile defense systems would be a “surprise” to any country operating its aircraft over Syria.
“I would recommend to our colleagues in Washington to carefully weigh possible consequences,” Konashenkov said, while adding that “dilettante illusions about stealth planes could collide with disappointing realities.”
Several days later, Russian President Vladimir Putin went a step further, approving a law ratifying Moscow’s deal with Syria to deploy its forces in the country indefinitely.
These measures have forced the Americans to choose between following through on their threats – that could result in another Cuban-style nuclear standoff with a different outcome – or accepting the demise of a unipolar world.
No one can say for sure which one Washington will choose.
A lot depends on whom the American people elect as their new president on November 8.
With Hillary Clinton in the White House and the right number of disgruntled neocons who would rather burn the whole world than accept the end of American ‘hegemony’, a nuclear Armageddon is entirely plausible.
Source: al-Ahed News 
15-10-2016 | 09:34

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

No document agreed at Syria talks in Lausanne: source

(TASS) No agreement has been reached or set out in a final document at the ministerial meeting on Syria held in the Swiss lakeside city of Lausanne, a source from a foreign delegation told TASS on Saturday.
“Agreements could not have been reached,” the source said. “The composition of participants did not make for it,” he added, explaining that he meant both a considerable number of participants and divisions among them.
The four-and-a-half hours’ ministerial meeting in the Swiss lakeside city of Lausanne centered on restoring truce in Syria. Initially, five nations had been expected to attend the meeting — Russia, the United States, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Eventually, the foreign ministers from Russia, US Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Qatar alongside UN Special Envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura participated in the talks.
In particular, Turkey and Iraq have serious disagreements over Ankara’s plans to take part in the liberation of Mosul. Earlier, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said that the issue would be discussed at the meeting in Lausanne.
Related Videos
Related Articles

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Amazing words by Donald Trump

I know, I know.  These are just words.  But listen to these words, these are absolutely amazing words, nobody before dared say what Trump says.  At the very least, I think that we have to give him the benefit of the doubt.
What if Trump is really sincere?  I am not saying that he is.  But I am wondering –what if?!


River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Russia’s First Year of Operations in Syria

15.10.2016 –
Written and produced by SF Team: J.Hawk, Daniel Deiss, Edwin Watson
To put Russia’s one year of peacemaking operations in Syria in perspective, one should think back to what the situation was like on the eve of the arrival of the first Russian aircraft, support personnel, military advisors, and military equipment, to Syria. By all accounts, Syrian government forces were in retreat on all fronts, being pushed back in Raqqa, Aleppo, Hama, Idlib, and Latakia provinces. The Islamic State, the Jabhat al-Nusra, the so-called “Free Syrian Army”, and many other smaller rebel formations were conquering towns and military bases, with their advance triggering a flood of refugees into Turkey, Jordan, and other countries. Syria stood practically alone, with some Iranian assistance for sure, against a seemingly motley group of rebel formations which, however, enjoyed generous financial, military, and even operational support by several outside powers, including the United States, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey, with Jordan and Israel maintaining a state of benevolent neutrality toward the rebels. In September of 2015, the days of the Assad government seemed numbered.
In September of 2016, virtually nobody expects the Assad government to fall. Even the US Secretary of State John Kerry, in conversations with Syrian opposition which were made available to US media, acknowledged that the anti-Syrian coalition has been outmaneuvered to the point that the long-standing US/NATO/EU mantra of “Assad must go” has become obsolete. To the extent that nearly everyone recognizes that the world is now multipolar, Russia’s effective use of military power in Syria is the single most important factor behind that shift. How did Russia manage to effect such a dramatic change in spite of seemingly overwhelming odds against it, in what is becoming a classic exercise in the use of military force?
The first secret of its success was the strict adherence to international law.To put it bluntly, US military operations on or over Syria’s territory have no legal justification at all. Similarly, the support of the rebel groups listed above, most of whom allegedly pursue a radical agenda, employ large numbers of mercenaries, and don’t hesitate from committing atrocities to impose alien political dogmas, violates all manner of fundamental international norms, not the least of which are the concept of national sovereignty and self-determination. In contrast, Russian operations are being conducted at the invitation of the sole internationally recognized government of Syria. If the comprehensive campaign of disinformation and propaganda that is intended to shield Western audiences from the reality of the war in Syria is any indication, Western governments are keenly aware of the immorality and illegality of their actions. And so is the rest of the world.
Secondly, and also in stark contrast with the US and NATO uses of military power, Russia’s leadership appears to be aware of both the limits of the country’s power and of what can be accomplished using solely military force. There is no trace of hubris, of “Russian exceptionalist” rhetoric in either the political aims being pursued, or the military means which are used to accomplish them. In military sense, the goal of the operation is a modest one–the denial of victory to the West-backed jihadist coalition. Once that objective is achieved, once every major anti-Syrian actor acknowledges that Syria’s legitimate government or Russia’s military presence in Syria cannot be dislodged by any combination of political and military measures, they will be forced to negotiate a peace settlement that will preserve both the territorial and political integrity of the Syrian state.
To be sure, that modest military objective did require a wide range of measures to accomplish. The most urgent was the refashioning of the crumbling Syrian Arab Army into a military force capable of recovering the lost territories. While in the immediate term that task could be addressed by an aggressive bombing campaign that took the jihadists, unaccustomed to being opposed by a modern air force, by surprise. But the air campaign was not intended to defeat the jihadists by itself, but rather gain time for the re-equipment and re-training efforts to bear fruit, which they began to by the first months of 2016. Moreover, in the event the jihadists were expecting to outlast Syrian and Russian forces, the campaign of aerial interdiction of rebel supply routes and the Islamic State’s oil infrastructure was aimed at undermining the opposition’s long-term ability to sustain the war effort.
However, the jihadists and wild geeze aren’t the most dangerous foes faced by Syria. The Russian military had to minimize the prospect of a direct NATO military operation against the Syrian military and government that, as in the case of Libya, would have been spearheaded by US airpower. The goal of conventional deterrence against both air and land NATO incursions was achieved, though only after the loss of one Su-24 bomber, treacherously shot down over Syria by Turkish fighters, by the deployment of advanced S-400 air defense systems, Su-35 fighters, and Iskander-M tactical ballistic missiles, and the demonstration of the power of Russia’s air- and sea-launched cruise missiles which would have struck US air bases throughout the Middle East in the event of any escalation.
This effort has not been without a cost. 20 Russian servicemembers have lost their lives in Syria in the space of last year. The Russian military has also lost, in addition to the Su-24 bomber, several attack and transport helicopters
The effect, however, has been nothing short of spectacular. Rebel forces are in retreat on nearly every important sector of the front, and even the crucial struggle for Aleppo, which has reached the scale of a general battle that will decide the future of Syria, has decisively swung in Syria’s favor. Outside Syria, both friend and foe have taken note. Russia’s engagement has served as a veritable “seed capital” that drew larger contingents of Iranian Revolutionary Guards, Iraq’s Shia militias, and Lebanon’s Hezbollah, into the fray. Turkey has opted for what amounts to a negotiated “separate peace” with Russia and Syria in exchange for a free hand to focus on the Kurdish threat to its own sovereignty. Even the US, whose leaders are perennially invoking “Plan Bs” in an effort to intimidate Russia, is finding itself without viable policy options. While the war is still far from over, after one year of intervention all the political and military trends in Syria are now in a positive direction.
Related Videos



River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Saturday, 15 October 2016

Sixty Years Ago: Nasser’s Message to Syria



Related Videos

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Can Americans Overthrow The Evil That Rules Them Or Will They Vote For Clinton?

Paul Craig Roberts
Paul Wolfowitz and the lies that he told in the high government positions that he held are responsible for a massive number of deaths and massive destruction in seven countries. Wolfowitz has announced his vote for Hillary Clinton. Does this make you feel reassured?
The real surprise would have been Wolfowitz’s announcement in favor of Donald Trump. So why was what was expected news?
Trump has said that he doesn’t see any future in the conflict Washington has initiated with Russia, and Trump questions the point of NATO’s continuing existence. These peaceful attitudes make Trump into a “national security risk” according to Wolfowitz.What Wolfowitz means is that a peace candidate is a threat to Wolfowitz’s doctrine of US world hegemony. In the crazed mind of Wolfowitz and the neoconservatives, America is not safe unless it rules the world.
Hillary is a warmonger, perhaps the ultimate and last one if she becomes president, as the combination of her hubris and incompetence is likely to result in World War 3. On July 3, 2015, Hillary declared: “I want the Iranians to know that if I’m president, we will attack Iran. . . . we would be able to totally obliterate them.”http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-clinton-if-im-president-we-will-attack-iran/5460484?print=1 The crazed Hillary went on from this to declare the President of Russia to be “the new Hitler.” Little doubt she thinks she can obliterate Russia also.
Hillary is the one who brought zionist neocon Victoria Nuland into the State Department to oversee the US coup in Ukraine in order to create more propaganda against Russia and force Washington’s European vassals to impose sanctions and place military bases on Russia’s borders, thus provoking a nuclear power and raising dangerous tensions.
This fits in perfectly with Wolfowitz’s intention. As Wolfowitz is Hillary’s likely Secretary of Defense, the two together mean World War 3.
When the Soviet Union collapsed, Wolfowitz, then a high Pentagon official, penned the Wolfowitz doctrine. The doctrine states that the principal goal of US foreign policy is to prevent the rise of other countries that could serve as constraints on US unilateralism. This means Russia and China,  The combination of Hillary with Wolfowitz should scare everyone in the entire world. The prospect of nuclear weapons being in such crazed hands as those of Hillary and Wolfowitz is the most alarming though imaginable.
The question is whether Hillary can be elected in the face of her violations of national security rules, for which she received a pass from corrupt Obama, and her heavily documented self-dealings that have produced a Clinton private fortune of $120 million and $1,600 million in their foundation. It is completely clear that the Clintons use public office for their private aggrandizement. Is this what Americans want? Two people who become even more rich as the world is led into nuclear war?
But with electronic voting machines, the question will not be decided by what Amerians want, but by how the electronic machines are programmed to report the vote. The US has already had elections in which the exit polls, always a reliable indicator of the winner prior to the appearance of electronic voting machines, indicated a different winner than the electronic voting machines produced. The secrecy of how the voting machines are programmed is protected by “proprietary software.” The machines have no paper trails, precluding vote recounts.
As both political establishments are fiercely opposed to Trump, how do you think the machines will be programmed? Indeed, the media is so opposed to Trump, the question is whether there will be exit polls and if there are, will they be misreported?
Republican operatives, not Republican voters, are all in a huff over their allegations that Trump is costing the Republicans votes. How can this be when Republican voters chose Trump over other candidates? Aren’t the Republican operatives saying that they, instead of the voters, should choose the Republican candidate?
If so, they are just like the Democrats. Some years ago the Democrat establishment created “super delegates” who are not chosen by voters. Enough “super delegates” were created in order to give the Party establishment the ability to over-ride the voters choice of presidential candidate. That it was the Democrats—allegedly the party of the people—who first took the choice away from the people is astonishing. Much information indicates that Bernie Sanders actually won the Democratic presidential nomination but was denied it by vote fraud and “super delegates.”
This is politics in America—totally corrupt. Chris Hedges might be right: nothing can change without revolution.
The demonization of Trump by the presstitutes is proof that Trump, despite his wealth, is regarded by the Oligarchs who comprise the One Percent as a threat to their agendas. The Oligarchs, not Trump, own or control the media. So the presstitute demonization of Trump is complete proof that he is the candidate to elect. The oligarchs who oppress us hate Trump, so the oppressed American people should support Trump.
The presstitute demonization of Trump did not work in the Republican primaries. Is it working in the presidential election? We don’t know, because the polls are reported by the presstitutes, not by Trump.
If the demonization does not work, and the election has to be stolen from Trump by the electronic machines, the consequence will be to radicalize Americans, something long overdue. Perhaps the expectation of this development is the reason all federal agencies, even the post office and Social Security, have acquired arms and ammunition, and Cheney’s firm Halliburton was paid $385,000,000 to build detention centers in the US.
Those who control us are not going to give up their control without a world war. In the United States evil has seized power from the people, and evil will not give it back.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Saudi Acknowledges Responsibility for Yemen’s Funeral Massacre

October 15, 2016
Sanaa massacre
Saudi massacre against civilians in Yemen’s Sanaa
The Saudi-led coalition acknowledged on Saturday its responsibility for the air raids which targeted a funeral hall in the Yemeni capital of Sanaa and claimed scores of hundreds of martyrs and wounded.
The coalition alleged that one of its warplanes had “wrongly targeted” the funeral.
“Because of non-compliance with coalition rules of engagement and procedures, and the issuing of incorrect information, a coalition aircraft wrongly targeted the location, resulting in civilian deaths and injuries,” the coalition claimed.
In a different context, the Yemeni army and popular committees destroyed two Saudi armored vehicles in Boqa’a exit, according to Yemeni sources.
Yemen has been since March 26, 2015 under brutal aggression by Saudi-led coalition.
Thousands have been martyred and injured in the attack, with the vast majority of them are civilians.
Riyadh launched the attack on Yemen in a bid to restore power to fugitive ex-president Abd Rabbu Mansour Hadi who is a close ally to Saudi Arabia.
Source: AFP
Related Videos

Related articles
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Selected Articles: Syria’s “White Helmets”: Fiction and Reality



Global Research, October 14, 2016
white helmets
By Ahmad Salah, October 14 2016
A young man, wearing a white helmet and a distinctive yellow-and-blue badge on his arm, digs for four hours in the rubble of a destroyed building in Idlib Province in northwest Syria. Finally, he sees what he’s looking for: an infant. He takes her to an ambulance like she is his own child. This is how the Western media portray the volunteers of Syria Civil Defense, also known as the White Helmets. But what does the reality look like?
plan-colombia
By Elena Sharoykina, October 14 2016
For decades Colombia has been some kind of battlefield where the USA try to restrain anti-US tendencies in South America. Washington has been fighting the ideas of neo-marxism, guevarism and Liberation theology, which inspire FARC rebels, as well as other left-wing fractions.  However, it’s not widely known that in jungles of Colombia there is another war front – the ecological one.
Kashmir capital
By Junaid S. Ahmad, October 14 2016
This past summer witnessed yet another people’s uprising in one of the longest running military occupations in modern times: the Indian occupation of Kashmir. The callous indifference to decades-old Indian atrocities against the people of Kashmir, including well-documented incidences of torture, disappearances, ‘encounter killings,’ rapes, and outright massacres, ought to put the international community to shame. This, after all, is a ‘conflict’ – a euphemism for a military occupation – that the UN and international law has clearly adjudicated on many decades ago, but Indian recalcitrance, Pakistani fumbling, and international criminal neglect have let the blood of Kashmiris spill uninterruptedly.
walter rodney
By Dr. Ajamu Nangwaya, October 14 2016
Dr. Walter Rodney was a revolutionary intellectual, socialist, Pan-Africanist and organizer who made a significant contribution to the Caribbean Radical Tradition[2] that seeks to create just, liberated and egalitarian societies in the Caribbean region. October 2016 marks the 48th anniversaries of the expulsion of Rodney from Jamaica and the subsequent Rodney Rebellion that took place as a reaction to his banning and the general exploitation of the African-Jamaican masses by the neocolonial regime.
672225d Bob Dylan
By Edward Curtin, October 14 2016
Despite the mute despair and apathy that fill the air, hope is needed to carry on and resist these destructive forces.  Sometimes in such a dark time the eye begins to see and the ear hears hope in unexpected places.  Doing so necessitates a bit of a sideways move to discover pockets of resistance hiding in the shadows.  There are torches of illumination in the underworld, but we need to come to our senses to get there.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!