Saturday, 23 January 2010

Gaza Jihad: Weather Foiled Israeli Soldier's Capture


Almanar

23/01/2010 Sources in the al-Quds Brigades, the Islamic Jihad's military wing, told Ynet Saturday that the recent week's stormy weather foiled their plans to capture an Israeli occupation soldier.

According to sources in the organization, a recent attempt to capture an Israeli soldier in central Gaza failed due to unfavorable weather conditions.

The soldier who was allegedly spared is an Israel Air Force paratrooper who accidently landed in the al-Bureij refugee camp in central Gaza. Jihad operatives en route to the landing site were unable to reach it due to floods caused by the absence of a dam which use to stand in the area, and was destroyed in a past IAF strike.

The Islamic Jihad says it haa video footage of the attempted abduction, "Which will be aired in due time."

The failed capture, added a Jihad source, "Is part of our efforts to kidnap Israeli soldiers and exchange them for our imprisoned heroes."

River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

AN APPEAL FOR HELP ~~ OPEN RAFAH FOR AYMAN


January 22, 2010 at 7:30 pm (Education, Gaza, Palestine, zionist harassment)

Ayman Quadar is a frequent contributor to this Blog. Read the following and please sign it afterwards. Together we can make a difference for Ayman, together we can make a difference for Palestine.


To:  All concerned citizens Text in English, Castellano and Català
OPEN RAFAH FOR AYMAN
Together we can make a difference for Ayman,
together we can make a difference for Palestine

Ayman Talal E. Quader is a Palestinian that was born on July 19, 1986 in Gaza and has lived in Gaza City for his entire life. As a young Palestinian student who truly loves his homeland and has always dreamed of freedom for his people, Ayman has worked very hard to achieve one of his most important goals in life; earning a scholarship for a Masters program in Europe.
Ayman was recently accepted to an academic scholarship program at the Universitat Jaume I (UJI) in Castellón, Spain for the International Masters in Peace, Conflict and Development Studies (PEACE Master). Ayman was also successfully granted a Spanish student visa in order to complete his academic program that begins February 2010 and runs all the way through to May of 2012.
“All I want is my basic rights to learn and study; rights that are supposed to be guaranteed and recommended by all the international resolutions and the United Nations.”
“I am not asking for a miracle, it is my reserved right. I am handling all my documents, visa, acceptance letter from my university and supporting documents. Why I am being prevented from leaving Gaza and prevented access to Spain?”
“The issue of the borders is politically extremely complicated,” Ayman said in an interview. “Since Hamas was elected as the leadership of the Palestinian people in 2006, the Israeli government has declared and relentlessly implemented a total siege on the Gaza Strip.”
The conditions of the borders have become extremely complex, making it almost impossible for Palestinians living in Gaza to leave under any circumstances, including for medical treatment, to visit relatives or on academic scholarship to study abroad. The borders, including the Rafah border – the only throughway between Gaza and Egypt – are all controlled by Israeli Security Forces, although Israel’s control of the Rafah border is more indirect than the borders leading out of Gaza and into “Israel Proper” (as defined by the 1967 armistice lines; see UN Resolution 242). The Egyptian authorities have been complicit with the Israeli government in the collective punishment of a civilian population, contrary to article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Conventions (1949), by neglecting much needed humanitarian aid and building supplies into the strip, pre and post Operation Cast Lead. The result is thousand of homeless and starving Gazans left with nowhere to turn but the international community.
Maan News agency reported earlier this month that throughout the entire year of 2009, the Gaza borders were only opened 33 times. This is truly a crime against humanity.
Israel AND Egypt are both in direct breach of international laws and conventions that guarantee fair access to education for Ayman as declared in the spirit of the United Nations Declaration of Universal Human Rights, Article 28, and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR, 1966).
The purpose of this manifesto is to send a swift and authoritative message to the Egyptian and Israeli governments, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! This is a call to lawyers, politicians, journalists and all activists for human rights to join the fight for Ayman and his right to the education that he has always dreamed of. Together we can make a difference for Ayman, together we can make a difference for Palestine, one step at a time.


Sincerely,
The Undersigned
View Current Signatures
—————————————————————————–
Juntos podemos hacerlo por Ayman,
juntos podemos hacerlo por Palestina

Ayman Talal E. Quader es un joven palestino nacido el 19 de julio de 1996 en la ciudad de Gaza (Palestina), donde ha vivido a lo largo de su vida. Como estudiante palestino que ama a su tierra y que siempre ha soñado en la libertad de su gente, Ayman ha trabajado duro para lograr uno de los objetivos más importantes de su vida: poder estudiar en Europa.
Recientemente, Ayman ha conseguido una beca académica para realizar el Máster Internacional en Estudios de Paz, Conflictos y Desarrollo de la Universidad Jaume I de Castellón. También ha obtenido un visado como estudiante con el fin de cursar dichos estudios, los cuáles empezarán en febrero de 2010 y se desarrollarán hasta el mes de mayo de 2012.
“Lo único que quiero es que se respeten mis derechos básicos, como el de la educación. Estos derechos están protegidos por todas las resoluciones internacionales y las Naciones Unidas”, señala Ayman en una entrevista. “No pido un milagro, es mi derecho. Tengo todos mis documentos: el visado, la aceptación de la universidad además de cartas de apoyo”, añade para después preguntarse: “¿Porqué me impiden salir de Gaza y entrar a España?”.
“La situación en las fronteras es extremadamente complicada”, dice Ayman. “Desde que Hamás salió elegido como líder del pueblo palestino en 2006, el gobierno de Israel ha declarado y, poco a poco ha implantado, un total estado de sitio en la Franja de Gaza”, asegura el joven.
Las condiciones en las fronteras son muy complejas, haciendo casi imposible que los palestinos que viven en Gaza puedan salir de su tierra bajo ningún concepto, ni siquiera para recibir tratamiento médico, visitar a sus familiares o estudiar en el extranjero. Las fronteras, incluyendo la de Rafah –el único paso entre Gaza y Egipto– están controladas por las Fuerzas de Seguridad israelíes. Sin embargo, Israel mantiene un control más indirecto sobre Rafah que en las otras fronteras que comunican Gaza con el territorio de Israel, según la delimitación de las Naciones Unidas en su Resolución 242 del año 1967.
Las autoridades egipcias han actuado como cómplices del Gobierno de Israel en castigos colectivos de la población civil, en contra de la Resolución 33 de la IV Convención de Ginebra de 1949. Egipto ha impedido la entrada de materiales para la construcción y la necesaria ayuda humanitaria en la Franja de Gaza, antes y después de la Operación Plomo Fundido (Operation Cast Lead). El resultado es de millares de personas sin techo y que sufren hambre sin ninguna otra esperanza que la comunidad internacional.
La agencia de noticias Maan informó a principios de este mes de enero que, a lo largo del año 2009, las fronteras de Gaza sólo se abrieron 33 veces en total, lo que significa un grave crimen contra la humanidad.
Israel y Egipto están infringiendo directamente las leyes y convenciones internacionales que garantizan el libre acceso a la educación para Ayman, tal y como recoge el espíritu de la Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos de las Naciones Unidas en su Artículo 28 así como el Pacto Internacional de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales (ICESCR, en sus siglas en inglés) del año 1966.
El objetivo de este manifiesto enviar un mensaje claro y firme a los gobiernos de Egipto e Israel: ¡YA BASTA! Esto es un llamamiento a abogados, políticos, periodistas, estudiantes y activistas por los derechos humanos para que se unan a la lucha por Ayman y su derecho a la educación en la que siempre ha soñado.
Juntos podemos hacerlo por Ayman, juntos podemos hacerlo por Palestina.
—————————————————————————–
Junts podem fer-ho per l’Ayman,
junts podem fer-ho per Palestina

Ayman Talal E. Quader és un jove palestí nascut el 19 de juliol de 1996 a la ciutat de Gaza (Palestina), on ha viscut al llarg de la seva vida. Com a estudiant palestí que estima la seva terra i que sempre ha somiat en la llibertat de la seva gent, Ayman ha treballat dur per aconseguir un dels objectius més importants de la seva vida: poder estudiar a Europa.
Recentment, Ayman ha aconseguit una beca acadèmica per realitzar el Màster Internacional en Estudis de Pau, Conflictes i Desenvolupament de la Universitat Jaume I de Castelló. També ha obtingut un visat d’estudiant amb el fi de cursar aquests estudis, els quals començaran el febrer de 2010 i es desenvoluparan fins al mes de maig de 2012.
“L’únic que vull és que es respectin els meus drets bàsics, com el de l’educació. Aquests drets estan protegits per totes les resolucions internacionals i les Nacions Unides”, apunta Ayman en una entrevista. “No demano un miracle, és el meu dret. Tinc tots els documents necessaris: el visat, l’acceptació de la universitat i també cartes de suport”, afegeix per després preguntar-se: “Per què m’impedeixen sortir de Gaza i entrar a Espanya?”.
“La situació a les fronteres és extremadament complicada”, diu Ayman. “Des que Hamas va sortir elegit com el líder del poble palestí l’any 2006, el govern d’Israel ha declarat i, de mica en mica imposat, un estat de setge a la Franja de Gaza”, assegura el jove.
Les condicions a les fronteres són molt complexes, fent gairebé impossible que els palestins que viuen a Gaza puguin sortir de la seva terra sota cap concepte, ni tan sols per rebre tractament mèdic, visitar familiars o estudiar a l’estranger. Les fronteres, incloent la de Rafah –l’únic pas entre Gaza i Egipte– estan controlades per les Forces de Seguretat israelianes. Tanmateix, Israel manté un control més indirecte sobre Rafah que en les altres fronteres que comuniquen Gaza amb el territori d’Israel, segons la delimitació de les Nacions Unides en la seva Resolució 242 del any 1967.
Les autoritats egípcies han actuat com a còmplices del Govern d’Israel pel que fa als càstigs col•lectius infringits sobre la població civil, en contra de la Resolució 22 de la IV Convenció de Ginebra de 1949. Egipte ha impedit l’entrada de materials per a la construcció i de la necessària ajuda humanitària a la Franja de Gaza, abans i després de la Operació Plom Fos (Operation Cast Lead). El resultat és de milers de persones sense sostre que pateixen gana sense cap més esperança que la comunitat internacional.
L’agència de notícies Maan va informar a principis d’aquest mes de gener que, al llarg del 2009, les fronteres de Gaza tan sols es van obrir 33 vegades en total, fet que significa un greu crim contra la humanitat.
Israel i Egipte estan incomplint les lleis i convencions internacionals que garanteixen el lliure accés a l’educació per a Ayman, tal i com es recull en l’esperit de la Declaració Universal dels Drets Humans de les Nacions Unides en el seu Article 28 així com el Pacte Internacional de Drets Econòmics, Socials i Culturals (ICESCR, en les seves sigles en anglès) de l’any 1966.
L’objectiu d’aquest manifest és enviar un missatge clar i ferm als governs d’Egipte i Israel: JA N’HI HA PROU! Això és una crida a advocats, polítics, periodistes, estudiants i activistes dels drets humans per tal que s’uneixin a la lluita per l’Ayman i el seu dret a l’educació en què sempre tant ha somiat.
Junts podem fer-ho per Ayman, junts podem fer-ho per Palestina.
Sincerely,
The Undersigned
View Current Signatures
River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

Hayya: Hamas keen on achieving reconciliation not leading to a civil war


[ 23/01/2010 - 02:36 PM ]


KHAN YOUNIS, (PIC)-- Dr. Khalil Al-Hayya, a member of Hamas’s political bureau, reiterated Friday his Movement’s keenness on achieving reconciliation leading to genuine partnership and harmony, and not to a civil war.

During a ceremony held to honor families of war victims in Khan Younis, Dr. Hayya said that this partnership should protect the agenda agreed upon and the resistance option, and regain the usurped rights.

The Hamas official also deplored the oppressive campaigns waged by Mahmoud Abbas’s militias against the Palestinian resistance and its supporters in the West Bank.

“What elections are they talking about while our people in the West Bank are still being arrested,” he stressed.

For his part, Dr. Salah Al-Bardawil, the spokesman for Hamas’s parliamentary bloc, stated Friday that his Movement diligently seeks to achieve the Palestinian reconciliation that is based on the resistance option and the national constants.

In a political symposium held in Deir Al-Balah in central Gaza, Dr. Bardawil said that Hamas is always keen on ending the internal division in order to confront the Israeli occupation despite the obstacles it has been facing since it won the elections.

He highlighted that Hamas would never backtrack on its principles or recognize the occupation, and would always be faithful to the blood of martyrs.

River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

Latin American leaders say US occupying Haiti and US says it will stay for long term

Latin American leaders say US occupying Haiti

Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:04:46 GMT




Bolivian President Evo Morales

Venezuela, Bolivia and Nicaragua say the US is using the international relief operation in Haiti as a cover-up for a military takeover.

Bolivian President Evo Morales said that he will request an emergency UN meeting to reject what he calls the US military occupation of Haiti.

"It's not right that the United States should use this natural disaster to invade and militarily occupy Haiti," Morales told a press conference on Wednesday.

"If you have all these problems with the injured and the dead from the earthquake, you have to go there to save lives, and you don't do that from a military standpoint," he added.

An outspoken critic of US policies, Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez also had accused Washington of occupying Haiti "under the guise of the natural disaster."

Nicaragua also has taken a similar stance toward US with respect to the situation in Haiti.

The United States is deploying up to 20,000 troops to Haiti. US servicemen have taken control of the country's international airport.

The Pentagon has sent one of its biggest aircraft carriers to Haiti, along with other navy and coast guard vessels.

On Friday, Arturo Valenzuela, the US assistant secretary of state for Western hemisphere affairs rejected that the US was occupying Haiti.

"Haiti is a sovereign country, everybody respects Haiti's sovereign country, the United States respects Haiti's sovereignty," said Arturo Valenzuela.



Fri, 22 Jan 2010 06:12:41 GMT

Despite criticism for the US military presence in quake-stricken Haiti, Washington says it has a long-term plan to stay in the country.

"We are there for the long term, this is not something that will be resolved quickly and easily," US Ambassador to the UN Alejandro Wolff said on Thursday.

Just three days after a magnitude 7 earthquake jolted Haiti on January 12, the United States began to send military forces to the impoverished Caribbean nation.

The head of US Southern Command General Douglas Fraser said on Thursday that nearly 20,000 US troops are due to operate, both on land and offshore, by Sunday.

Currently over 2,676 US troops are operating on the ground in Haiti, Fraser said, adding the number is going to swell to 4,600 by the weekend and that another 10,445 are currently afloat aboard vessels offshore.

More than 4,000 other soldiers and Marines also left North Carolina late Wednesday.

This is while leading international aid organization, Medecins Sans Frontieres, blasted the US for putting the delivery of soldiers before medical supplies.

The presence of the US military, which has taken over command of the distribution of humanitarian aid, has raised the ire of some other countries including France, Nicaragua and Venezuela.

Paris demanded the United Nations investigate and clarify the dominant US role in Haiti.

Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega said Haiti seeks "humanitarian aid, not troops."

Venezuela's Hugo Chavez accused the US of seeking to occupy the country. "The United States government is using a humanitarian tragedy to militarily occupy Haiti. I read somewhere that they even occupied the [presidential] palace."

Washington, in the past, has been accused of interfering in Haitian internal affairs on many occasions. The US military played a role in the departure of former President Jean-Bertrand Aristide before his second term was over in early 2004. Aristide described his departure as kidnapping.

Haiti was occupied by US Marines for nearly 20 years from 1915 to 1934. Former US President Bill Clinton sent troops to Haiti in 1994.

Security “Red Zones” in Haiti Preventing Large Aid Groups from Effectively Distributing Aid As thousands of well-equipped US soldiers pour into Haiti, there is an increasing concern about the militarization of the country, supporting the soldiers and not the people. Or, as one doctor put it, “people need gauze, not guns.” We take a look at aid distribution in Haiti and the effect on Haitians fighting to survive in the aftermath of the earthquake. [includes rush transcript] Filed under Haiti, Haiti Earthquake
River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

“Stability and Justice and Right of Al-Quds and Palestine” – Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamed

Intifada Voice

Speech by Yabhg Tun Dr Mahathir Bin Mohamad At The General Conference For The Support of Al Quds
 

River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian


Dr. Mahathir Bin Mohamed

THE STATE OF THE WORLD

1.  I would like to welcome participants at this General Conference for the Support of Al-Quds and to thank the organizers for this opportunity to speak on the subject of “Stability and Justice and Right of Al-Quds and Palestine”.
2.  We live in a world that is only partially civilized.  I say this because we still believe that the way to solve conflicts between nations is to kill people in what is called war.  The winner is the side which succeeds in killing the most number of people.  Yet we vehemently declare that killing people is murder, a terrible crime worthy of the most severe punishment.  We are being openly hypocritical.  Mass killing is glorious but killing one man is a heinous crime.  There is something wrong with our thinking.  While one can excuse those defending themselves there can be no excuse for the aggressors who resort to killing.
3.  But that is not all.  We talk much of justice and the rule of law.  We urge countries to uphold the rule of law.  But the very people who talk most about the rule of law feel no embarrassment when they themselves blatantly disregard the very laws which they want others to respect and uphold.
4.  They world of today is one hypocritical mess.   Despite high-sounding sentiments and slogans, the killings are still going on and there is injustice everywhere.  The rich and the powerful are still inventing, producing and equipping themselves with more and more weapons of mass destruction (WMD) even as they go to war to stop others from having the WMD.

ORIGIN OF THE MESS

5.  I would not be wrong if I say that the mess we are in today have their origins in the western imperialism of the past.  During the heyday of colonialism they had no compunction about drawing borders which divided people, changing demography by moving large numbers of people to occupy other people’s land, and when they had to give up their empires time bombs were left everywhere, racial, religious, economic, financial and military time bombs.  They then insisted on the new states practising democracy even though they themselves had imposed authoritarian rules when they were occupying their colonies.
6.  One of the greatest injustices done was to take Palestinian land to give to the Jews to create the state of Israel.  It was so easy to take what belongs to others in order to give to people who had been giving you problems in your own country.  The Palestinians must be sacrificed to save the Europeans from the depredations of the Jews.
7.  The Jews had always been a problem in European countries.  They had to be confined to ghettoes and periodically massacred.  But still they remained, they thrived and they held whole Governments to ransom.  Even after their massacre by the Nazis of Germany, they survived to continue to be a source of even greater problems for the world.  The Holocaust failed as a final solution.  Creating a state for them was thought to be a better solution.  It could be if some European territory had been allocated to make a permanent ghetto for the Jews.  But of course if this was done the affected European state would rise in arms and kill all the Jews the way they had been doing before.  So the debate was about creating an Israeli state in Uganda, Africa, or somewhere in Latin America or Palestine of course. It was so easy to decide on Palestine, a British mandated territory.  Restrictions on the disposal of mandated land could be ignored.  This is nothing new – reneging on solemnly given undertaking is endemic with Europeans.

PALESTINE

8.  The majority of the people in Palestine at that time were Arab Muslims.  There were a few Arab Christians and Jews.  But the world recognized Palestine as an Arab Palestinian state.
9.  It may have been a part of Sham or Syria, an Arab territory in the Ottoman Empire.  But the British and the French, disregarding the locals, decided to break Sham into several Arab states and Palestine was one of them.  Disregarding totally the wishes of the people, Palestine was given to the British as mandated territory.
10.  Maybe that is recent history.  We should ignore it.  We should think of the past.  Historically it was occupied and ruled by the Jews off and on.  But before the Jews there were the Canaanites.  The Jews seized Filistine from the Canaanites.  So if we must recognize past owners, the Canaanites have more rights than the Jews.  The Canaanites have metamorphosed into Arabs and today’s Palestinians, some of whom at least, must be the descendants of the Canaanites.  Historically therefore the Palestinian Arabs have more right to Palestine than the Egyptian Jews who conquered it and ruled it sporadically.
11.  We cannot therefore take only the ancient history of the place.  It is far legitimate to accept what existed in Palestine before the arbitrary partitioning.  We did this for all the colonies seeking independence.  The British mandated territory was an Arab Palestine, and was recognized as such.  The British did not have a mandate on Israel or any Jewish land.  Palestine was Arab at the relevant point in time.
12.  There may have been reference to Israel in the Bible but even then it was not as a nation state but actually as a vague part of Canaan.  To claim exclusive right to a land based on some reference to it in a holy book is to legitimize all historical claims which will result in massive changes of the land and boundaries in the world.  There would be endless conflicts and wars as there is hardly any country which does not have a historical claim to some territory or other.  Even Malaysia has a lot of claims.  Singapore was a part of Johor.  But we realized the impracticality of claiming it.

MANDATED TERRITORY

13.  But the Palestinians claim is legitimate.  The land of Palestine was until only 60 years ago their land after its liberation from Ottoman Turkey.  The mandate given to the British was to hold it until such time when it could be given back to the people there, the Palestinian Arab majority and the Jewish minority.  There was no right accorded the British through the mandate to give it to anyone else and certainly not to the Jews to create a homeland for them.  The British have committed a grave injustice when they reneged on their undertaking.
14.  Looking at Palestinian history and origins from any angle, there is nothing to warrant the disposal of the mandated territory of Palestine in any other way than by giving it back to the people living there.  The Palestinian Arabs were not all Muslims but certainly the vast majority of them were.  There were a few Arab Christians and a few Jews.  They too would be the citizens and would retain their right to whatever they held in Palestine.
15.  Perhaps the Palestinian Arabs should be regarded just as Arabs, the people of the land of all the Arabs.  But Arabs have divided their lands into nation states and each one of them have their own nationality.  Obviously the Arab states do not regard Palestinian Arabs as their citizens.  Palestinian Arabs are the citizens of Palestine.  Palestine is therefore the land of the Palestinian Arabs.

SEIZURE OF PALESTINIAN LAND

16.  The seizure of Palestinian land in order to create the state of Israel was unprecedented and was accompanied by the killings and expulsion of the Palestinian Arabs from their land and their country.  This was done in full view of the whole world.  Certainly the British were totally aware of the inhuman treatment of the people they were mandated to administer and look after.
17.  Though the British were totally culpable, they raised not a finger to protect the Palestinian Arabs.  And yet they had clearly stated in various documents that “nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine”.  Expelled from their own country, the Arab Palestinians lost all their land and properties and for the last 60 years and more they have been living under intolerable conditions as refugees in other countries.
18.  Is it wrong for them to want back their country? Is it wrong for them to seek every means to return to their own country? Isn’t it natural for them to feel this way about their own country?
19.  They have no means to fight back and wrest their land from the invaders and occupiers.  They had called on the Arab League to help them fight a conventional war to regain their heritage.  But their brother countries were no match against the might, not just of Israel, but of the most powerful countries in the world – the United States of America, Britain and France.
20.  The unequal fight has gone on for six decades now.  The Palestinians have lost more land in the process.  They have not been allowed to even call what remains under their control as the state of Palestine, not allowed by Israel and apparently endorsed by the Western powers.  They are now just the Palestinian Authority.  Jewish settlements are built on their land and high walls separate Arab families from each other.  They may not even use roads built on their land.  Humiliation after humiliation are heaped upon them.  Their Gaza land was invaded by the Israelis.  More than a thousand of them have been killed – many more wounded.  After the cease-fire the bombings and rocketing are still going on.
21.  But if their enemies hope to crush their spirits they are mistaken.  The Palestinians have not broken down.  Their spirit is stronger than ever.  They will continue to fight for their rights and justice even if it takes a century or even more.

THE WORLD’S ATTITUDE

22.  The world may wish to ignore the war and wish that it would go away.  But it is not going to go away.  Instead it has given birth to what the West choose to call terrorism.
23.  We can condemn these acts but when people are driven into a corner they cannot be too particular about how they fight back.  Bereft of the sophisticated weapons possessed by their attackers, they have to make do with the primitive weapons that they can devise.
24.  Telling them that such acts as suicide bombings are immoral and that their victims are little children will not stop them.  After all when the bombs and rockets of the Israelis hit them, no amount of scientific precision will stop the Palestinian children, the old and the sick, the non-combatants from being maimed and killed.  The Palestinians are terrified by these attacks.  To them the terror they feel is real.  And therefore their attackers are to them terrorists.  State terrorism is no less terrifying than those by irregulars.
25.  In Gaza the indiscriminate bombings, rocketing and bull-dozing of homes while the occupants were still in them obviously terrify the people.  The terrifying attacks against civilians must be considered acts of terror as well.  Is there much difference between non-combatants being killed by suicide bombers than those being killed by bombs dropped from above, by rockets fired from distant and invisible sites or by armoured bull-dozers destroying homes and killing the people in them?

JUSTIFYING TERRORISING MUSLIMS

26.  In September 2001, the World Trade Centre was attacked allegedly by terrorists.  I am not sure now that Muslim terrorists carried out these attacks.  There are strong evidences that the attacks were staged.  If they can make Avatar, they can make anything.  Killing innocent people to provide an excuse for war is not new to the US.
27.  But whether real or staged the 9/11 attacks have served the United States and Western countries well.  They have the excuse to mount attacks on the Muslim world.  Apart from the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, the world’s Muslims, all 1.6 billion of them, have been essentially declared to be terrorists who must be subjected to all kinds of indignities to prove that they are.
28.  Today the world is made to feel insecure.  Everyone must fight the war against terror.  Billions of dollars are being spent to counter terrorism.  Air travel in particular has been greatly affected with Governments and airlines losing billions of dollars from the decline in air travel.
29.  Just when the counter-terrorist measures seem to be working a new incident has shown that security of air travel has not been achieved.
30.  New measures, which add greatly to the cost and the inconvenience to airlines and air travelers have been introduced.  But there could still be a chink in the armor.  The desperate “terrorist” may find yet another way to outsmart the security measures.
31.  Scan their shoes, confiscate bottles of cosmetics, search their underpants, scan their bodies, do whatever but when people feel death is better than living under oppression, living without freedom and honour, the threat of the attacks will always be there.
32.  The war against terror which the Western powers profess they are fighting cannot be won by the sophisticated and costly weapons that are pouring out of the western industrial plants.  The war against terror essentially is a guerilla war.  The battlefield is the whole world.
33.  Guerilla wars cannot be won by armies, navies and air forces equipped with the most sophisticated destructive weapons.  The world has not realised this yet.  The guerillas always win in the end.  That is what we have seen in Vietnam, in the numerous wars of independence of the colonies.  That is what we are seeing in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Governments may surrender but guerillas will fight on.
34.  Guerilla wars can only be won by winning the hearts and minds of the people.  The present world wide guerilla war has a definite cause.  It is primarily to regain the land the Palestinians had lost.  It is the injustice perpetrated on the Palestinian people.  It is the misery of the people of Palestine who have been forced to live in primitive camps for the past six decades.  It is the denial of their right of return to reclaim their lands in occupied Palestine.
35.  Until the creation of the state of Israel on Palestinian land, the world was secure for people to go about their business, to travel and to enjoy life.  Now the security is gone.  For the people who are responsible for the creation of the state of Israel, for the people who sustains it with their moral, financial and military support, there can be no security.  The danger of being attacked or killed anywhere in the world will always be there.
36.  If they choose to make every Muslim a terror suspect, they will have to accept that they have 1.6 billion enemies lurking in every corner of the world.
37.  But if they choose to eliminate the primary cause of the present violence and indiscriminate killings, then there is a good chance that the world will become secure again, that they can go anywhere in the world without fear of being blown up, kidnapped or simply being shot.
38.  The world need to take cognizance of the root cause, that is the fate of the Palestinians.  The world must be concerned about their sufferings.  The world must remedy these ailments.
39.  Some might think this would be giving in to blackmail.  Well conventional war, attacking a country is also blackmail.  Give in or be killed and destroyed.  Give in or the mailed fist would keep on hammering you.  That is blackmail too.  And you will pay the price for ignoring it.

ISRAEL UNILATERALLY BANNED PALESTINE

40.  The Jews have always found refuge in other lands.  It is true that in Europe they had often been persecuted, confined to ghettoes and even massacred.  But whenever they were persecuted in Europe they had always found safe havens in Muslim countries.  There they have lived, practicing their own religion and prospering from their financial and business skills.
41.  But when they acquired a country for themselves they reject non-Jew immigrants.  Worse still they would not allow the people whose country, land and properties they had seized to even return to their homes.  That these people are the same people who had given them refuge from persecution in the past seems to mean nothing to them.
42.  In seizing the land of the Palestinian to create a homeland for the Jews, the West has launched the longest and the biggest guerilla war of liberation.  The West has made a grievous mistake by doing this.  It is continuing to perpetuate the mistake by supporting a state that is leery of international practices and laws.
43.  If we are going to see an end to the guerilla war the West must acknowledge their mistakes and at the very least help implement the right of return of the Palestinian Arabs to their homeland. They are not asking for much.  All they are asking for is stability and justice and the rights of Al-Quds and Palestine.

Source: Global Peace Perdana, Malaysia.



Mahathir bin Mohamad : Malaysian politician, prime minister (1981 – 2003). The son of a schoolmaster, Mahathir studied medicine and worked as a government medical officer before entering parliament in 1964, where he became a forceful advocate of policies to ensure economic success for ethnic Malays. Once prime minister, he was reelected repeatedly; under his leadership Malaysia achieved one of the most prosperous economies in Southeast Asia.
*****************************
January 22, 2010 Posted by Elias

Amos Yadlin: "Turkey does not need Israel anymore..."


Friday-Lunch-Club


Again Yadlin is 'whispering' to whom-it-may-concern, that to preserve Turkey the secular, 'someone' in Turkey needs to rid the country of the 'radicals' ...
Via WPR in Zaman/ here


The strategic ties between Israel and Turkey are not at the same level they were a decade ago, as the latter is no longer dependent on close cooperation, Israel’s military intelligence chief has said.
The comments by Maj. Gen. Amos Yadlin to the Knesset’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee reflected wider concern in the Jewish state following a high-profile visit to Turkey by Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak on Sunday that was meant to help mend the relationship after a sharp diplomatic row.
“Beyond the specific current tension, one needs to realize that the distancing is more fundamental and relates to strategic issues and common interests between Israel and Turkey,” Yadlin was quoted as saying on Tuesday by Ynetnews, an English-language Israeli news portal, during a security briefing to the committee members.
“There are still common strategic issues between Israel and Turkey, but it’s not the same strategic closeness that existed in the past. In the past Turkey acknowledged joint interests, which strengthened the relationship. For example, in the 1990s, the Turks regarded Syria as an enemy. There was a joint enemy. However, over the years Turkey and Syria resolved their differences, and Turkey doesn’t need Israel’s closeness anymore,” Yadlin elaborated.
“In the past they had an interest in securing their Syrian border and therefore their relations with Israel were strong. In the past Turkey strove to come closer to the West, beyond joining NATO,” he said.
The latest crisis between Turkey and Israel, which was triggered by a televised insult against Turkey’s ambassador in Tel Aviv, has underscored the presence of a new paradigm in bilateral relations between the two countries that has been since last winter, when a three-week offensive by Israel in the Gaza Strip left about 1,400 Palestinians dead, most of whom were civilians.
Despite acquiescing to demands from Turkey and apologizing for the insult to its ambassador last week, analysts said it is not yet clear whether Israel will embrace this new paradigm set by Turkey, which says a return to normal in bilateral ties depends on concrete steps by Israel to end the months-long humanitarian tragedy in Gaza as well as a sign of willingness to revive peace efforts in the Middle East.
“They wanted to become a member of the European market, and they thought that relations with Israel would promote them in the American market as well. They got a cold shoulder from the Europeans and couldn’t achieve their goals. In light of this, they changed their policy and are now in the midst of a process of distancing themselves from the secular approach towards a more radical direction,” Yadlin argued. “They are currently in the midst of a fundamental process of moving further away from the secular Atatürk approach, closer to a radical approach,” he claimed.....
Turkey, a member of the NATO defense pact, has a history of military cooperation with Israel and of mediating for the Jewish state with the Arab world. But ties have been shaken by a series of harsh and public criticism from both sides, culminating last week in the televised reprimand in Jerusalem of Turkey’s ambassador."

Posted by G, Z, or B at 12:26 PM
River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

Hebrew press: Israeli government foiled prisoners' swap deal




PIC

[ 23/01/2010 - 08:23 AM ]

OCCUPIED JERUSALEM, (PIC)-- A Hebrew daily said that the lack of coordination between Israeli premier Benjamin Netanyahu and his special envoy on the prisoners exchange deal Hagai Hadas had led to failure of the deal.

Yediot Ahronot on Friday quoted "well informed sources" as saying that the Israeli government and its negotiators were largely responsible for the failure of the exchange deal, ruling out a near conclusion of the deal.

The sources said that a deal was about to be concluded last December despite the presence of certain gaps. They noted, however, that no meeting was held in Israel since July till December last year to coordinate stands of concerned parties.

Sources close to Netanyahu had said that he refused the latest swap offer tabled by the German mediator.

The paper said that Hadas told the Germans to eliminate the names of all senior leaders on Hamas's list for prisoners to be released in exchange for Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit.

River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

Gaza's thin red line one year later

The Electronic Intifada,

Eva Bartlett, The Electronic Intifada, 22 January 2010

"The last Israeli attacks were the hardest, the most dangerous. It wasn't a war, it was a massacre. They shot anyone walking, anyone outside of their home, in their home ... it didn't matter. And it didn't matter if the victims were children or adults; there was no difference."

Ali Khalil, 47, has served as a medic with the Palestine Red Crescent Society (PRCS) and private hospitals in Gaza for more than 20 years. He has seen some of the worst atrocities committed by the Israeli army. During Israel's war on Gaza last winter, Khalil worked in Gaza's northern region, venturing repeatedly into high-risk areas bombarded by Israeli tanks, helicopters and warplanes to rescue the injured and retrieve the dead.

During the 23-day invasion, the Israeli army warplanes, drones, warships, tanks and snipers rendered entire areas off-limits and impossible for ambulances and civil defense fire and rescue trucks to reach. In the north, Ezbet Abed Rabbo and Attatra, east and northwest of Jabaliya, respectively, were among the districts occupied by the Israeli army.

Through the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Palestinian rescuers were sometimes able to coordinate with the Israeli army to gain access to areas they controlled.

"We'd wait five hours, even over 30 hours, for coordination from the Israelis to enter the area to retrieve wounded or martyred," says Khalil. "And much of the time, we wouldn't get it."

Even coordination, however, did not ensure access or safety.

"On 9 January, we went to retrieve wounded and martyred. There were three ambulances, and one ICRC jeep in front. We had coordination via the ICRC," says Khalil.

Marwan Hammouda, 33, a PRCS medic for the last 10 years, was on the same call. "We were driving to the area, speaking with the Israelis on the phone. They'd tell us which way to drive, what road to take. When we got near the wounded, Israeli soldiers started firing. I told them, 'We have coordination' and they said to wait. Then they began firing at us again."

Emergency workers under fire

According to the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR), that same day, 9 January, Israeli soldiers fired on a convoy of 11 ambulances led by a clearly marked ICRC vehicle in central Gaza, injuring an ICRC staff member and damaging the vehicle.

This was not the only that occasion emergency medics came under fire. During the invasion, Israeli forces killed 16 medical rescuers, four in one day alone. Another 57 were injured. At least 16 ambulances were damaged with at least nine completely destroyed.

Although the Geneva Conventions explicitly state that "medical personnel searching, collecting, transporting or treating the wounded should be protected and respected in all circumstances," throughout Israel's invasion this was not the case. Indeed, as the injured and emergency workers testify, Israeli forces targeted and prevented medical workers from reaching the wounded.

"If we can't even access areas with ICRC coordination, how are we supposed to help people?" asks Khalil.

Without coordination, many ambulances did not dare risk Israeli gunfire and shelling, meaning hundreds of calls went unanswered, according to PCHR. Denied medical care, many victims succumbed to their wounds.

It was days before ambulances could reach the bodies of at least five members of the Abu Halima family who were killed when Israeli shelling and white phosphorous struck their home. In addition, two young male cousins, Matar and Muhammad, were shot dead by Israeli soldiers as they tried to drive a tractor-pulled wagon carrying the injured and martyred.

Ambulances trying to answer the calls were fired upon by machine guns and further shelling. Ali Khalil is still traumatized by what he and other emergency workers finally found days later.

"I brought back baby Shahed's burned, gnawed corpse."

The infant body that Khalil carried out, burned by white phosphorous, left in the tractor wagon, had been partially eaten by stray dogs.

"For the rest of my life I'll remember that day. I'll never get over it."

Khalil is among many veteran medics who feel all the emergency workers need counseling for the stresses and traumas endured in their work.

River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

Ahmed Abu Foul in the destroyed Palestine Red Crescent Society station, Ezbet Abed Rabbo.

The ambulance which Arafa Abd al-Dayem was loading when he was fatally struck by an Israeli-fired dart bomb.


Ahmed Abu Foul, 26, works as a medic and coordinator of all the PRCS volunteers in northern Gaza. He also works as a medic and coordinator with the Civil Defense, Gaza's fire and rescue services. He is newly a father of a baby girl.

Abu Foul has narrowly escaped death while working on many occasions, and his body bears the scars of Israeli-fired bullet, shrapnel and flechette (dart bomb) injuries. In the last invasion alone, Abu Foul was twice targeted by snipers, was at the Fakhoura school when it was hit by white phosphorous shells on 6 January, and was in a building that was being bombed while emergency workers tried to evacuate the victims. In the latter incident, Abu Foul's colleague was killed and Abu Foul was lacerated with shrapnel to the leg and head.

Despite his many close calls, Abu Foul maintains a convincingly cheerful attitude, and continues to work full time for both the Civil Defense and the PRCS. However, he admits the psychological and physical pain have not abated since the last Israeli attacks.

"My left leg is useless. When I walk too much, the pain becomes unbearable and my leg won't support me. There's still shrapnel in it, and the nerves were badly damaged by the shrapnel."

It's the same leg that was shot in May 2008 while Abu Foul was on a mission for PRCS, he says. Just above the support bandage around his calf, a hollow in his leg above his kneecap shows where the bullet bored straight through.

"A doctor here said he could remove the shrapnel and repair the nerves, but wanted to open it up from my foot all the way to my thigh," he says of his recent injury.

"I have pain in my head also, especially when it is sunny," he adds. "There's still shrapnel in it from the shelling, although doctors already removed three pieces."

He endures both injuries, waiting for specialists and the means outside of Gaza to remove the shrapnel. "It's too dangerous here; we don't have the means nor the medical equipment to locate the shrapnel before removing it."

Medical shortages under siege

Under siege since after Hamas' election in early 2006, Gaza is still not receiving all the necessary medical supplies needed, nor the spare parts to repair aged machinery. Doctors, unable to leave Gaza, cannot obtain advanced and specialized training. The health care system, post-invasion and under siege, is in more dire condition than before the Israeli attacks one year ago. According to Gaza's Ministry of Health, stocks of 141 types of medicines are depleted, as are 116 types of essential medical supplies.

Aside from Abu Foul's very present physical pain, it is memories of the wounded, the martyred, and the loss of his colleagues that still troubles him.

"I was with Dr. Issa Saleh coming down the stairs from the sixth floor of an apartment building in Jabaliya, evacuating a martyr, when the Israelis again shelled the building. They knew there were medics inside. They could see our uniforms and the ambulances outside. Dr. Saleh was hit by the missile."

Abu Foul describes in testimony to the al-Mezan Center for Human Rights how he believed he'd been mortally wounded.

"I put my hand on the back of my head and I found blood and brain. I then saw Dr. Issa had been decapitated and realized it must have been his head hitting my head and his brain on the back of my head."

Just days earlier, Abu Foul and other medics came under heavy Israeli fire for several minutes as they attempted to reach the injured.

The extreme stress and loss have manifested in Abu Foul's daily life. "I feel as though I don't care about anything now. Now, when I get angry I find myself hitting and throwing things. I feel nervous and I shout a lot now," he told al-Mezan.

Yet Abu Foul takes his role as an emergency rescuer seriously and is not daunted in his work, in spite of how it has affected his personal life. Abu Foul now continues to seek replacement equipment, requesting delegations visiting Gaza to bring any sort of emergency equipment.

"Ten out of sixteen fire engines are functional. We need fire hoses, spotlights for the trucks, handheld spotlights for searching in the dark, chemical extinguishing spray, electric saws for cutting through wreckage ..." The list is long and seems impossible when the Israeli siege on Gaza is tighter than ever.


A Palestine Red Crescent Society ambulance, destroyed by Israeli bombing at the al-Quds hospital and PRCS station, Tel al-Hawa, Gaza City.

Duty calls

"Each invasion becomes harder than the last," says Marwan Hammouda. Like his colleagues, Hammouda has no fear of death, and like them he has a history of injuries in the line of work, the latest being a gunshot to his left foot when the ambulance he was driving came under Israeli fire in Jabaliya.

Since Israel's invasion, Hammouda has developed a thyroid disorder, a condition doctors say is a result of post-traumatic stress.

"You saw the last war," he says. "There was nowhere safe, not homes, not schools, not kindergartens, not media buildings." And not ambulances.

"So do I want to die in my home, or in my work, at least helping people who have been injured?" Hammouda asks. "The Israelis don't have any respect for international law. And I have absolutely no confidence that things will change because American politicians give sweet speeches."

"My children got used to the idea that I could die at any moment in our work," says the father of six. "During the Israeli attacks, I only saw them for five or ten minutes a day. Some days I didn't see them at all because I was always with the ambulances."

Hassan al-Attal, 35, a father of three, was shot by an Israeli sniper while carrying a body from Zimmo crossroads east of Jabaliya back towards the wailing, flashing ambulance.

Since the Israeli tanks rolled in with the land invasion after the first week of aerial bombardment, injured and trapped residents of Ezbet Abed Rabbo -- one of the hardest-hit areas during the Israeli attacks -- had been calling for ambulances to evacuate the wounded and the dead. In almost all cases, emergency rescuers were unable to reach these calls, hindered by Israeli army shooting and shelling.

A medic for ten years, Attal has on many occasions come under Israeli fire and aggression while working.

His gunshot injury during the 7 January mission at 1:30pm came during Israel's self-declared "humanitarian cease-fire hours," when civilians were told they could safely walk the streets to buy food supplies or otherwise leave their homes.

After carrying the corpse only a few meters, Israeli sniper fire broke out on Attal and Jamal Said, 21, the volunteer with him.

"We came under heavy fire, around 20 shots. I was shot in the left thigh," says Attal.

Hazem Graith, 35, a father of four and a medic with the PRCS since 1999, worked in Gaza's north during the Israeli attacks.

Like most medics, Graith came to the profession out of a sense of obligation to his community. "Because I love to help people," he says.

Graith too has come under Israeli fire on many occasions. However, he is quick to emphasize that while the Israeli attacks on rescuers during last winter's invasion were the most savage and numerous yet, they were not isolated incidents. Rather, they were part of a larger Israeli policy of denying access of emergency personnel to the wounded which dates back to the beginning of the second Palestinian intifada in September 2000.

Targeting hospitals and medical facilities

In addition to attacking rescuers, Israeli warplanes and tanks attacked medical facilities and clinics during the Israeli war on Gaza. An investigative report published by the Guardian in March 2009 found that 15 of Gaza's 27 hospitals were bombed, and another 44 clinics were damaged -- two destroyed completely -- although the Israeli military knew the coordinates of all the facilities.

On 15 January, the al-Quds hospital complex in Tel al-Hawa was shelled repeatedly, including with white phosphorous, causing fires to break out, extensive damage and forced the evacuation of all patients from the hospital.

The al-Wafa rehabilitation hospital in eastern Gaza -- the only one of its kind in the entire territory -- was attacked on the night of 15 January by tank shelling, including with phosphorous, and machine gun fire. Hospital residents included the disabled and immobile patients, as well as the elderly. Fire broke out on the roof of the hospital, and most buildings in the complex sustained extensive damage.

When medics were forced to evacuate the Ezbet Abed Rabbo PRCS station on the second day of the land invasion, the small band of ambulances temporarily stationed outside of Hamid's home in Jabaliya. Days later, they moved to Beit Lahia's al-Awda hospital, where they were based for the rest of the Israeli attacks.

"It was the most dangerous invasion we faced. Everywhere was dangerous, there was no safe place. Especially after 4pm it was extremely dangerous to be on the streets. But if we didn't go out, who would help the people?"

Dodging missiles and gunfire on the streets and at attack sites, medics were further hounded at their temporary station at al-Awda hospital.

"The Israelis launched missiles on al-Awda, a hospital. Fortunately no one was killed in that attack, but it's a hospital, and our ambulance base," says Hamid.

Lost colleagues

Khaled Abu Sada, 43, another long-term medic, will never forget the Israeli attack that savagely martyred his colleague Arafa Abd al-Dayem.

On 4 January, at around 10am, medics Sada, Abd al-Dayem and PRCS volunteer Ala Sarhan, 23, answered the call of civilians targeted by Israeli tank shelling in northern Gaza's Beit Lahiya.

As they brought the injured and martyred to the ambulance, the medic team was struck by an Israeli tank-fired dart bomb. The flechettes, just two inches long and dart-shaped, are designed to bore through anything, to break apart upon impact, to ensure maximum damage. Arafa Abd al-Dayem, 35, a father of four and volunteer medic for eight years, was shredded by the darts.

Abu Sada testified to the Guardian: "I came round here and found Arafa kneeling down with his hands in the air and praying to God. They found his body full of these nails. The guy that had been brought to the ambulance was in pieces. He was now missing his head and both his legs."

Arafa Abd al-Dayem went into shock and died an hour or so after the attack, while Ala Sarhan was paralyzed by the injuries sustained in the attack.


Arafa Abd al-Dayem, the night before he was killed by Israeli fire while on duty.

The first night of Israel's land invasion during last winter's attacks; the Ezbet Abed Rabbo PRCS station had to be evacuated because of Israeli shelling.


Powerless to help

Ashraf al-Khatib has been a medic for 11 years. During the Israeli attacks, he worked at Rafah's PRCS station. "On 15 January we got a call from a man who said his brother was dead and he was injured by multiple Israeli gunshots. Ahmed and Ibrahim Thabet didn't know the Israeli army were nearby when they rode their motorcycle through a district of eastern Rafah."

Called at 11am, al-Khatib attempted to get Israeli coordination via the ICRC to reach the injured man.

"We tried for hours. Ibrahim kept calling us, crying, panicked. We explained we couldn't reach the area because of the Israeli army. We told him how to stop his bleeding to his chest and leg until we arrived."

Unable to wait any longer, al-Khatib and colleagues made the decision to risk going without Israeli coordination.

"I told them, we may die. But we agreed to go."

Two ambulances reached the area and brought out the dead and injured men.

"We had snipers trained on us, lasers on our foreheads and chest," he says.

Having reached the Thabet brothers, the medics saw more victims.

"It was a busy area. People didn't know there were Israeli snipers nearby."

But because of renewed Israeli firing, al-Khatib's ambulances were forced to retreat, leaving the victims behind.

Al-Khatib recalls another well-known case in Gaza, that of the Shurrab family in Rafah.

"We got a call from Muhammad Shurrab saying he and his sons had been evicted from their home by Israeli soldiers, then shot. They were all living but injured," he explained.

The family waited, trapped between an Israeli tank and their home, bleeding of their injuries, he says.

"We went, when we tried to reach them Israeli soldiers fired on us, so we retreated and tried to get coordination. Shurrab would call every so often; I'd tell him to be patient while we tried. It was winter, so in addition to their injuries, they were freezing."

Al-Khatib relates the saga which went on through the night.

"Later, the father called to say one son had died. We called Al-Jazeera television and told them the Israelis were preventing us from reaching Shurrab. Al-Jazeera took his mobile number and interviewed him live on the air. By that time his second son had died. Twelve hours later the Israelis finally allowed us to reach him, but his sons were both dead."

Al-Khatib says this was the worst challenge he has faced as a medic.

"I knew they were injured but there was no way to reach them, then the kids died. The Israeli army was playing with us," he says.

Muhammad, who declined to give his last name, 30, a volunteer medic and ambulance driver at the Tel al-Hawa PRCS station, was among the team sent to retrieve injured from the Samouni neighborhood in Zaytoun, eastern Gaza, while the attacks were still raging.

"When we arrived, we saw two tanks and a bulldozer between the trees. The tanks aimed their machine guns at the ambulance and the Israelis told us to continue forward. We went about 500 meters. Suddenly 20 or 30 soldiers appeared on foot and surrounded the ambulance, pointing their guns at us. They told me to get out of the ambulance, slowly. I did. They told me to take off my clothes. I did, at the same time telling them we'd come to bring out injured."

They ordered his colleague Rami, a volunteer medic, to get out and strip his clothes.

"They forced us to lie on the ground."

For the next 30 minutes, Muhammad says, they lay on the cold ground in their underwear, soldiers sitting on their backs, guns trained on them.

"Finally, after maybe 30 minutes, they let us go. But they didn't let us retrieve the injured or the children."

"Why shoot at ambulances?"

Throughout Gaza, during and before Israel's latest invasion there, stories of detention, attack, delay and bombardment of stations of both medic rescuers and the Civil Defense abound. Despite the scale of the aggression, the last Israeli war on Gaza was not a precedent for emergency workers, but the continuation of a deeply-entrenched Israeli policy violating international law.

In April 2009, journalist Amira Hass reported in the Israeli daily Haaretz finding a note in Gaza ordering soldiers to "open fire also upon rescue." Written in Hebrew, Hass reports that the note was found in a home occupied by Israeli forces during the war on Gaza. A military spokesperson, she writes, denied the note represents official Israeli army policy. But the facts on the ground and bodies in the graveyard point to a different conclusion.

Although one year has passed since the Israeli invasion, throughout Gaza the psychological wounds are still wide open. For the emergency rescuers, the prospect of the next Israeli attack is all too real and all too routine.

"Nothing is forbidden here, there is no international law where Israel is concerned. Even though the Geneva Conventions say we have the right to reach the wounded, Israel does not pay attention to international law," says medic Hazem Graith.

Like Hammouda, Graith speaks wryly of the Israeli explanation for such attacks.

"Why shoot at ambulances? Why destroy them? Why kill medics?" he asks. "The Israelis say we are militants or are carrying militants, that's the reason they give for targeting medics. Lies, all lies. In our ambulances there are only ever wounded or martyred."

While the destruction of ambulances is a major obstacle to medics' work, Graith calls for more than mere aid.

"We don't want new ambulances from the international community. We want you to see what Israel does and apply pressure to stop Israel from firing on ambulances."

He emphasizes, "Go to the root of the problem."

All images by Eva Bartlett.

Eva Bartlett is a Canadian human rights advocate and freelancer who arrived in Gaza in November 2008 on the third Free Gaza Movement boat. She has been volunteering with the International Solidarity Movement and documenting Israel's ongoing attacks on Palestinians in Gaza. During Israel's recent assault on Gaza, she and other ISM volunteers accompanied ambulances and documenting the Israeli attacks on the Gaza Strip.

Obama after Massachusets: "A diminished ability to take risks in his foreign policy ..."

Via Friday-Lunch-Club

Netanyahu factored in all that and concludes that Palestinians are fairer game!
Laura Rosen/ Politico/ here


"Add one other thing to the list of consequences for President Barack Obama of the Massachusetts Senate race: a diminished ability to take risks in his foreign policy.
Democratic foreign policy observers predict that a weakened domestic political position will make Obama inclined to be more selective in choosing when and with whom to engage, focusing on opportunities where he can demonstrate success over more ambitious but less certain efforts, such as trying to achieve Middle East peace.
They also predict a more populist president focused more on job creation than the globe-trotting and triumphal speech making in Cairo, Istanbul, Prague, Moscow, Beijing and Ghana that Obama took time for in his first year.
From his seemingly stillborn efforts to revive Middle East peace talks to his ambitious arms control agenda, the sense that Obama has been weakened at home could factor into the calculations of foreign leaders sizing up the president and determining whether they should risk their own domestic political standing to accommodate U.S. policy.
“What really counts is the perception among friends and adversaries of whether or not he can deliver,” says veteran Middle East peace negotiator Aaron David Miller, now with the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars. “Obama’s premier legislative accomplishment – that would legitimize his political standing in the U.S. – is now literally up for grabs. There’s no doubt that he has been badly wounded.”

Benjamin Netanyahu listens to President Obama.
The White House discounted any foreign policy impact to the lost Senate seat.
“The President’s responsibility to protect the American people is in no way affected by politics,” NSC spokesman Mike Hammer told POLITICO. “His national security agenda is driven by America’s national security interests, and not by anything else.”
Likewise, Jon Alterman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies said that Obama it a was mistake to think Obama was “mortally wounded” by Republican Scott Brown’s victory. But he nonetheless foresees an impact: “The question becomes: How does the president respond to this? Is he more selective in his priorities, and what are those priorities?” Maybe by being more selective in the problems he tackles.
"Hypothetically, if the Iranians or Arabs and Israelis presented the president with the prospect of success, then what happens in Massachusetts does not affect him in the least,” Woodrow Wilson Center’s Miller said. But failing that, “he cannot look for additional vulnerabilities.”“What he can’t afford now is the foreign policy equivalent of a Massachusetts’ Democratic meltdown.”
Former Clinton administration speechwriter Heather Hurlburt predicts the loss of his veto-proof majority in the Senate will reinforce a trend “over the last six months, ….of [the White House saying], ‘Let’s pick spots very carefully.’ Rather than backing down, ‘let’s be sure to pick the right battles.’” An administration foreign policy official agreed that any effect would be indirect – but argued that wouldn’t make it any less real.
“To the extent that 67, not 60, is the relevant number when it comes to the Senate and U.S. foreign policy, the Brown victory carries less direct impact on the Obama foreign policy agenda than on his domestic policy goals,” said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, referring to the number of Senate votes needed to ratify treaties such as the one on strategic arms reduction in the final stages of negotiation with Russia.
“It is the more indirect impact that may prove more significant,” the official continued. “Will Republicans now be emboldened to hand the President another political defeat by rejecting what the White House will tout as a significant foreign policy achievement? …. Will Republicans start finding a more aggressive voice in criticizing the President's overall handling of U.S. foreign policy? Will they start asserting he is too soft on Russia and China? Too hard on Israel? Will there be a renewed clamor for military action against the Iranian regime?”
There were already signs this week that Congressional Republicans were raising the volume on familiar criticism that the Democratic approach to counterterrorism is overly legalistic and insufficiently hard-nosed.
Sen. Kit Bond of Missouri, the ranking member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, seized on testimony by Obama’s intelligence chief Dennis Blair describing how Nigerian terrorism suspect Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was questioned by the FBI, provided a lawyer and read his Miranda rights after his arrest in Detroit. “The Obama “administration [should] change course from their pre-9/11 mentality of treating terrorists like common criminals,” Bond argued.
Another Washington Democratic foreign policy hand said the Obama White House is likely to disengage from extraneous foreign policy engagements in stages: “By early-midsummer, the political folks will tell the policy folks that it’s only Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan that is on the President’s schedule,” he predicted.
Leading to the mid-terms, he added, the president is going “to be on the plane" to every political battlefield around the country. If the Democrats suffer serious losses next November, the message from the White House political shop is likely to be more pointed: “The president is now a war president and an economy president.”

Some of the foreign coverage of the Massachusetts race certainly came to that conclusion. “Obama’s loss is Netanyahu’s gain,” argued Aluf Benn of Israeli daily Haaretz, referring to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “For nine months, Netanyahu held his ground against pressure by Obama … From now on, Obama will be much more dependent on support from his Republican adversaries, who are supporters and friends of Netanyahu.”

Posted by G, Z, or B at 2:20 AM
River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

Jeremy Corbyn MP: Arrest Tzipi Livni!

Intifada Voice

British MP Jeremy Corbyn: Absolutely Determined to Maintain the Principles of Universal Jurisdiction on War Criminals



“That this House believes that universal jurisdiction for human rights abuses is essential as part of the cause of bringing to justice those who commit crimes against humanity and will oppose any legislation to restrict this power of UK courts.”
Jeremy Corbyn

January 22, 2010 Posted by Elias

River to Sea  Uprooted Palestinian

In Memory of Martin Luther King Gilad Atzmon have a Dream




Friday, January 22, 2010 at 1:58PM Gilad Atzmon

I also have a dream that one day the Jewish state, a state sweltering in the heat of injustice, sweltering in the heat of oppression; will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and fairness.

I have a dream that in the ‘Jew-Only State’ people will not be judged according to the blood of their (Jewish) mother, but rather by the content of their character.

I have a dream today!

I have a dream that one day, down in Israel in spite of their racist Foreign Minister, mas-murderer Defense minister and Jewish supremacist Prime Minister, one day right there in between the river and the sea boys and girls will be able to join hands as sisters and brothers.

I have a dream today!

I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, and every ‘Separation Wall’ will be rubble. The horror of the refugee camps will be made plain and the crooked Israeli town will be made straight by Palestinians returning to their homes, villages, fields and orchards. "And the glory of the Lord shall be revealed and all flesh shall see it together." God Almighty, we are free at last!

I have a dream today and this dream will become true. However when this happens the Jewish state will be called Palestine and it will be one and a state of its citizens.

Inshallah
River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian