Saturday, 6 April 2013

Salam & Jumblatt: 'A family affair gone sweet!'

FLC


'Those were the fathers!'

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Prosecute groups that support Israeli crimes

Editor http://www.redressonline.com/2013/04/prosecute-groups-that-support-israeli-crimes/
Prosecute hasbara

Jewish hasbara bodies aiding and abetting Israeli crimes must face the full force of the law

By Nureddin Sabir
Editor, Redress Information & Analysis

The world of Jewish politics is so back to front and upside down that, when it comes to Israel, bad is good and wrong is right.

That is the sad fact of which we need to remind Israel flag wavers, such as failed US politician Katrina Lantos Swett, who from time to time rear their heads to bleat “anti-Semitism” and decry the “deligitimization of Israel”, which they blame for allegedly rising anti-Jewish sentiment.

On 5 April the Times of Israel reported that a Jewish organization in Melbourne, Australia, could face expulsion from the country’s Jewish umbrella body for launching a campaign that calls for the boycott of products from West Bank settlements.

These settlements – colonies and squatter camps, in fact – are illegal under international law and, with their rapid expansion under successive Israeli governments, both of the left and the right, are terminally undermining any prospect of a two-state solution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

Boycott settlements call

The Australian campaign “Don’t Buy from the Settlements” was launched on 26 March by the Melbourne-based Australian Jewish Democratic Society (AJDS) with the aim of encouraging Australian Jews to avoid buying products made in Jewish colonies and squatter camps located in the Palestinian territories occupied after the 1967 war.

In a media release published on its website, the AJDS said:

Israeli settlements are seen around the world as a major obstacle to creating peace between Israelis and Palestinians. One way to take a stand against the harm they create is not to buy the products they produce. This sends a clear message that we will not be complicit in the settlement programme.

According to Jordy Silverstein, an executive member of the AJDS:

Not buying products from settlements will not work on its own, but it is one small step that we can take. When we add in the possibility of sharing knowledge about what the settlements mean and what they do … we can work alongside Palestinians, Israelis and people throughout the diasporas to create an exciting, liberating future.

However, this principled stance of the AJDS quickly prompted Australia’s Israel hasbara (propaganda) groups to gang up against it. For them, anything short of total, unconditional support for Israel, its illegal occupation and colonization of Arab territories, its war crimes and its crimes against humanity is tantamount to treason.

Orgy of Jewish solidarity with Israel

So, first came the umbrella Jewish organization, the Zionist Federation of Australia, which described the call for boycott as “immoral” and “repugnant”.

Then came the Jewish Community Council of Victoria, which consists of more than 50 Jewish organizations in the state. Its president, Nina Bassat, touted the idea of expelling the AJDS for having the audacity to call for action against Israeli criminality.

Bassat was joined in this orgy of Jewish tribal solidarity with the racist Israeli state by Peter Wertheim, of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, who also called for the AJDS to be expelled from Australia’s Jewish umbrella body.

“The AJDS campaign is repugnant to the strong anti-BDS policies of every Jewish communal roof body in Australia,” he bleated, referring to the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement, “and to the ECAJ [Executive Council of Australian Jewry] platform of support for Israel and its legitimacy as the state of the Jewish people”.

“Anti-Semitism” and support for Israel

If there is indeed a rise in anti-Jewish sentiment anywhere in the world, then to find the cause look no further than the above-mentioned types of frenzied Jewish defence of Israeli crimes.

There is a strong case for nurturing a worldwide culture at grassroots level that promotes international legality and opposes crimes committed or sponsored by states. As a first step towards this, it is necessary to bring to account groups and individuals that support criminal actions committed or sponsored by states.

Just as in most civilized countries there are laws against aiding, abetting and glorifying terrorism, and against crimes such as rape and drugs trafficking, so there should also be laws that proscribe supporting or glorifying state crimes.

If neo-Nazis and Nazi holocaust deniers can be prosecuted in Germany, France and elsewhere in Europe, so should organizations that support Israeli crimes also be prosecuted, whether in Australia or anywhere else, for aiding, abetting and/or glorifying Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

“N.Korea Can’t Protect Foreign Embassies after April 10”

 
Local Editor
 
North Korea: long range missile (Archive)North Korea asked foreign embassies to consider evacuation amid growing tension, warning it will be ‘unable to guarantee’ their safety after April 10. Moscow said it is examining the request, but is not planning to evacuate diplomats anytime soon.

The Foreign Ministry of North Korea on Friday has “proposed that the Russian side consider the issue of evacuating the embassy staff in connection with the increasingly tense situation on the Korean Peninsula,” the spokesman of the Russian Embassy to the DPRK Denis Samsonov told RT news website.

The Russian side “is examining the suggestion,” but the embassy is working normally and there’s no sign of tension in Pyongyang, Samsonov said.

The notification was sent to all foreign embassies and diplomatic missions in Pyongyang, and, according to Xinhua news agency, explained the deteriorating situation by “the increasing threat from the United States.”

“The current question was not whether, but when a war would break out on the peninsula,” Xinhua cited the North Korean document.

The British Embassy in Pyongyang has received a communication saying that the North Korean government “would be unable to guarantee the safety of embassies and international organizations in the country in the event of conflict from April 10,” according to a UK Foreign Office spokesman.
The Russian Foreign Ministry on Friday called for all sides to refrain from “war hysteria,” and stressed there’s “no alternative other than political and diplomatic solution” for the Korean crisis.
South Korean media said that North Korea moved another medium-range missile to its east coast on Friday. Earlier this week, the US announced it was strengthening missile defense system to its base on the Pacific Ocean island of Guam in response to the North Korean missile deployment.

Nevertheless, the South Korean Defense Minister Kim Kwan-jin called the possibility of a full-scale provocation from Pyongyang “small” and the threats “rhetorical.”
Source: Websites
05-04-2013 - 20:23 Last updated 05-04-2013 - 20:23
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Hamas military wing training FSA in eastern Damascus.




Nicholas Blanford

من حماس إلى النصرة يمتد طريق الغدر والخيانة ..والكل متورط في جريمة سفك الدم السوري
The military wing of Hamas, a former ally of President Assad, is training the rebel Free Syrian Army in eastern Damascus. Diplomatic sources said that members of the Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades were training FSA units in the rebel-held neighbourhoods of Yalda, Jaramana and Babbila.

The development appears to confirm that Hamas, the Palestinian militant group that runs the Gaza Strip, has made a final break with its former Syrian host and fully embraced the patronage of Qatar, the small but influential Gulf state that is a major financial and logistical backer of some rebel factions.

“The Qassam Brigades have been training units very close to Damascus. These are specialists. They are really good,” said a Western diplomat with high-level contacts in the Assad regime and the Syrian opposition who visits Damascus regularly.

Other sources suggested that Hamas trainers were helping the FSA to dig tunnels beneath at least one contested area of Damascus in preparation for a widely expected assault on the city centre. Hamas has extensive experience in tunnel-building in Gaza, to smuggle goods in from Egypt and to infiltrate Israel or launch attacks against Israeli targets.


A Palestinian source from Lebanon’s Ain al-Hilweh Palestinian refugee camp said that it was common knowledge that a few hundred Hamas militants were fighting alongside the FSA in the Yarmouk and Neirab Palestinian camps in Damascus and Aleppo, Syria’s commercial capital.

Any such link is vehemently denied by Hamas. Osama Hamdan, a leading Hamas official based in Lebanon, said: “It’s a false thing. There are no members of Ezzedine al-Qassam or any militant members of Hamas in Syria.

“We don’t interfere in the internal problems of Syria. Our members there are normal civilians, Syrian Palestinians, who live with their families there. From the beginning of what has happened in Syria we rejected as a movement any involvement of any Palestinian in the current events in Syria.”
The Assad regime gave shelter to Hamas in Damascus from 1999 when the group was expelled from Jordan. Hamas was a component of the “axis of resistance”, the pan-regional alliance that also grouped Iran, Syria, Lebanon’s militant Shia Hezbollah and smaller Palestinian factions.

However, when the uprising against the Assad regime erupted two years ago, Hamas found itself caught between its loyalty to the regime and obligations to its Palestinian supporters, who overwhelmingly sided with the Syrian opposition. Hamas, as the only significant Sunni member of the “axis of resistance”, risked angering the predominantly Sunni opposition in Syria by standing beside a regime that is drawn from the Alawite sect...

... Khaled Meshaal, Hamas’s top political leader, quietly slipped out of Damascus in February last year and moved to Qatar. That same month, Ismael Haniyah, the head of the Hamas Government in Gaza, openly declared the movement’s support for the Syrian opposition....

.... The state-run media accused Mr Meshaal of being “ungrateful and treacherous”.On Wednesday, following Mr Meshaal’s re-election as head of Hamas’ political wing for a fifth term, Ath-Thawra, a Syrian regime newspaper, said that he had shifted “the gun from the shoulder of resistance to the shoulder of compromise”.

Mr Meshaal “cannot believe his luck. After an acclaimed history of struggle, he has returned to the safe Qatari embrace, wealthy, fattened in the age of the Arab Spring’s storms,” it said.

There have been scattered reports of Hamas personnel travelling to Syria to participate in the rebellion. One Palestinian, identified as a Hamas trainer, was killed in Idlib in December. Hamas said that he had left the movement before travelling to Syria but nonetheless reportedly organised a lavish funeral for him.

Palestinian and Arab diplomatic sources said that if Hamas had dispatched military trainers to Damascus it was most likely at the behest of Qatar rather than a unilateral decision by the movement’s leadership.

Qatar is believed to be directing its support to military factions associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, the ideological parent organisation of Hamas. Qatar has also become the main paymaster for Hamas since the movement split from the Assad regime and funds from Iran have slowed. 
In October 2012, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani, the emir of Qatar, became the first foreign head of state to visit Hamas-run Gaza, during which he pledged $400 million to the tiny coastal strip.

In October 2012, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani, the emir of Qatar, became the first foreign head of state to visit Hamas-run Gaza, during which he pledged $400 million to the tiny coastal strip.
The alleged involvement of elite Hamas combatants in training the FSA comes as the rebel forces show indications of readiness for a long-anticipated final assault on the regime-controlled city centre.
According to reports, the training of FSA fighters at military bases in Jordan has accelerated and rebel reinforcements are heading to Damascus from other parts of the country....

As expected Hamas denied the Times report. LIARS

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Friday, 5 April 2013

Roland Rance and the Red Synagogue Need You

 

Wednesday, April 3, 2013 at 9:36PM

Gilad Atzmon


Must read,

an amusing exemplary case of tribal progressive tantrum. This time it is because the outspoken George Galloway referred to me as 'one of the world's greatest' (along side Julian Assange).

Apparently Wiki's vandal Roland Rance , Tribal commissar Haim Bresheeth and, Sabbath Goy Ben White are all there amongst other notorious AZZs, and they are in a state of panic.

For some reason, their anti Atzmon capaign is leading nowhere.. my work has been endorsed by every person in this movement with IQ over 110.



Look at Ronbald Rance's FB's call for action (PDF)

Watch tribal operator Roland Rance lobbies (PDF), AIPAC can learn a lot..


and this:
http://www.facebook.com/kevin.ovenden/posts/10152701197110468?comment_id=39374590

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

NAKBA APARTHEID AND BDS

Daniel Mabsout,
 
happy-nakba-day1[1]

The BDS campaign and company and other NGOs that endorse the BDS should not be investigated only regarding their boycott policy and its effectiveness on the ground and repercussions on the cause , but should be investigated primarily regarding their motives , plans and consequences concerning Palestine and the Palestinians . The fact that they start from recognizing Isra…el’s right to Historic Palestine and whatever land Israel usurped before 1967 makes them in favor of Israel rather than of Arabs and Palestinians and this by giving Israel an underserved legality and legitimacy . The policy of boycott followed by BDS calls for boycott on the ground of recognizing and normalizing with Israel . It boycotts the part in favor of the whole .

The fact that BDS does not impose the right to return to their homeland to all Palestinians as a precondition to any solution, makes their approach even more dubious and ridiculous . In case Palestinians do not return , the lifting – by Israel – of the so called Apartheid policies will only benefit the Arab Palestinians inside Israel who represent but a portion of the Palestinians and a minority group in occupied Palestine who might see their condition improve at the detriment of the cause itself and at the expense of the majority of Palestinians who will have to suffer endless exile and homelessness . This will also have for effect to boost Israel’s image as a democratic country and a model country in the region and hide its real usurping assaulting nature.

The approach of the BDS regarding Palestine is extremely controversial and some of their endorsers- mainly Ali Abunima of the Electronic Intifada – have reached the point of asking Israel to annex the West Bank and grant its inhabitants equal rights with Israelis and solve thus the Palestinian problem.
If these projects and suggestions of the BDS movement do not serve Israel then whom do they serve ? And why the BDS and its endorsers have totally overlooked the alternative of armed struggle not even mentioning the armed Resistance of HAMAS or that of Hizbullah that has reaped success- especially in Lebanon- and defeated Israel- by the testimony of Israelis themselves- and liberated the south after 18 years of occupation without any concessions given to the enemy? Instead of being acclaimed and saluted for its achievements, such Resistance is shunned and ignored on behalf of Palestinians whose land has been occupied for more than 60 years and who could have employed this achievement of the Resistance to improve their condition regarding Israel if not to get inspiration for any future endeavor.
Whom does the shunning of the armed Resistance serve? Does it serve Israelis or Palestinians?? All this shows that BDS – and its endorsers- play in Israel’s hands and are monitored and manipulated and intimidated by Israeli s and by Jews living abroad who have been lately almost ordering them around .

The great chaos that the Palestinian issue is going through , the successive failures and shortcomings of the different organizations and the lack of self criticism and absence of true assessment and evaluation of the situation, and the sectarian alignment that overtook HAMAS , much more than Israel’s so called might or assumed superiority, is responsible for the emptiness that allowed organizations with Jewish and Israeli affiliations -like BDS – to speak for Palestinians and draw the line of action of the cause .

Mind you , this BDS suffers from the same ailment the other Palestinians organizations suffer from , it lacks real evaluation and assessment of its role since it started its action more than eight years ago, and it is not about to admit the fact that all its actions and endeavors have very slightly – if not at all- affected the Palestinian situation . The truth is that the Palestinian situation has degenerated- lately- from bad to worse and will degenerate more and disintegrate more- at all levels – whether at the level of prisoners or settlements or Jerusalem or Gaza or Holy Sites or military assaults , nothing whatsoever has been achieved while organizations- like BDS- who monitor most functions in the occupied land- remain in a limbo situation giving Israel enough time to recover from its successive military defeats and plan carefully for the next period and resume its policies of expansion and occupation.

Is fool whoever thinks that Israel will give up such plans or give Palestinians anything that Palestinians will not get except through Resistance and struggle as the Lebanese example shows. Palestinians and Arabs from the four quarters are required to awaken to this reality and to assess the whole Palestinian and Arab situation and to determine their choices and define their line of action and recover their unity and solidarity defeating the schemes of division and partition and quarrel and refusing the recognition of the usurped State – as an Apartheid State or any state – whether via BDS or any other Palestinian organization .
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

More than a year for his crime: Damascus University Criminal Ammar Baloch appears in the documentary and exposes Al-Arabiya, Al-Jazeera, and Wahhabi revolution

RECRUIT OR KILL: WAHHABIS IN SYRIA TARGET UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Posted on April 4, 2013 by Libya 360°



 
 
Published on 4 Apr 2013

Eretz ZenAfter the horrendous attack on Aleppo University earlier this year by the “Free Syrian Army” (FSA), there have been other attacks on universities that led to the death of students. This video has two parts. Part 1 shows the reaction from a university professor after her students were killed by the mortar attack of the FSA as she completely lets her anger loose on those who support this “revolution.” She defies them by proudly stating that she stands strongly behind President Bashar al-Assad.

Part 2 shows an interview of a kid – Ammar Baloush – brainwashed by the FSA to kill his fellow students based on sectarian affiliation, which apparently made them Shabbiha, because they support their government. He shows no remorse or regret for his crime. On the contrary, he feels bad he did not kill more. The interview is recent; however, the crime itself took place back in late 2011. Many in the Syrian opposition hailed him as a hero back then.


بعد أكثر من عام على جريمته : مجرم جامعة دمشق عمار بالوش يظهر في شريط وثائقي ويبصق بوجه كلاب"الجزيرة" و"العربية" وثورتهم الوهابية

 
بيروت، الحقيقة(خاص): في 27 كانون الأول / ديسمبر 2011، أقدم المجرم عمار تيسير بالوش، الطالب في كلية الهندسة الطبية بجامعة دمشق، على إطلاق النار على زملائه في قاعة المحاضرة فقتل أحدهم وأصاب أربعة آخرين بجروح ، قبل أن يولي هاربا.
وخلال دقائق كان الخبر يعم قنوات الدعارة الإعلامية كلها، وعلى رأسها مدعرة عبد الرحمن الراشد المسماة "العربية" ومدعرة فيصل القاسم المسماة "الجزيرة" ، عن أن "شبيحا أطلق النار على زملائه المؤيدين للثورة السورية"!
 
أما مراسل "الجزيرة" ، الطالباني المجرم أحمد زيدان ( سليل الطليعة الإسلامية المقاتلة هو وعائلته كلها) ، فقال على موقعه "سوريون نت" ما حرفيته : "شبيح موال للنظام يطلق النار في جامعة دمشق ويقتل اثنين من المعارضين". وجرت جريه مواقع الثورة الوهابية كلها التي زعم بعضها أن السلطة اعتقلت بالوش وأعدمته، بينما زعم بعضها الآخر أنها أطلقت النار عليه وهو هارب فأردته قتيلا.
 
بالوش ظهر أمس مع المسلحين في ريف دمشق في شريط وثائقي لقناة "أو تي في " اللبنانية ، وروى تفاصيل بطولته وهو يضحك فرحا مثل ابن عاهرة وضعته أمه في كرخانة من نطفة قواد، فبصق بروايته في وجه دجالي وكلاب "العربية" و"الجزيرة" وبقية حثالات الثورة الوهابية الحقيرة.
 
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Jordan rushes towards the Syrian adventure

الأردن يندفع نحو المغامرة السوريّة

 

‏الجمعة‏، 05‏ نيسان‏، 2013

أوقات الشام

ياسر قبيلات
بات واضحاً اليوم في عمان أن الأردن لا يدير سياسة خاصة في ما يتعلق بالأزمة السورية. ولكنه يحاول التواؤم مع أدوار إقليمية ودولية يتم اقتراحها عليه، أو تحديدها له، وأن الأمر تعدى مجرد لعب دور المضيف الحدودي لحركة اللاجئين السوريين، إلى مناقشة (وربما تقديم) المساهمة الأردنية في ثلاثة اتجاهات هي: تدريب مجموعات مسلحة مرتبطة بمخططات الولايات المتحدة وحلفائها حول سوريا، وطبيعة المشاركة الأردنية في أي عملية عسكرية مقبلة (قد يكون الإعداد لها بلغ مرحلة متقدمة)، وإيجاد «المنطقة العازلة» بواحدة من الصيغ العديدة، التي يجري تداولها.

ومن اللافت ان الإشارات إلى ذلك جاءت منذ بداية الشهر الماضي، وقبل انعقاد قمة الدوحة التي تردد أن الأردن أظهر تردداً وموقفاً مختلفاً عن عتاة خصوم سوريا العرب، وما تبع القمة من صخب برلماني أردني، يُعتقد أنه موجه ومبرمج من دوائر رسمية، ضد قطر والسعودية، ما يستدعي سؤالاً حول مدى انسجام «الممانعة» الأردنية في وجه مقررات الدوحة مع توجه الأردن نحو ركوب حافلة المغامرة السورية.

في السياق ذاته، تأتي تصريحات رئيس الوزراء الأردني عبدالله النسور بشأن استعداد حكومته لإعلان ثلاث محافظات شمال البلاد (المفرق، اربد، عجلون) مناطق منكوبة، مع إظهار النية للذهاب بذلك إلى مجلس الأمن الدولي. رافقتها كذلك تقديرات علنية تؤكد أن الأسوأ لا يزال بانتظار الأزمة السورية، وأن تداعيات هائلة وشيكة ومرتقبة ستدفع بملايين السوريين للجوء إلى المملكة، ليبلغ عدد هؤلاء نحو ثلاثة ملايين لاجئ.

وقال النسور، في جلسة خاصة مع إعلاميين أردنيين، إن ثمة حرباً مقبلة، سمّاها «عالمية»، ستترك تأثيرها الكبير على الأردن، وبطبيعة الحال على سوريا؛ لكن هذه التقديرات (أو ربما المعلومات) لم تستدع منه أن يعيد حساباته في ما يتعلق باللجوء السوري، بل على العكس أكد أن الأردن لن يغلق أبوابه أمام حركة اللجوء، ما يشير إلى أن الجار الجنوبي لسوريا ليس ببعيد عن محاولة انتهاز «الرياح المقبلة» والاستثمار فيها مسبقاً.

وتركز النغمة السائدة في عمان على أن الأردن سيفعل كل ما من شأنه ضمان حدوده الشمالية، مع ملاحظة أن هذا القول لم يقتض الحد من اللجوء باتجاه الأردن، ولا ضبط الحدود وإغلاقها أمام المسلحين الذين باتوا يستخدمون ثلاث عشرة نقطة حدودية غير رسمية للعبور إلى سوريا. مع ملاحظة أن «درعا» باتت مفردة سهلة على لسان المسؤولين الأردنيين، بالدرجة نفسها التي يُظهر بها الإسرائيليون رغبة في تحريك الحدود وراء الجولان المحتل، واستثمار جهود المجموعات المسلحة في إطفاء نظام الدفاع الجوي السوري في تلك المنطقة.

ومن الواضح أن الأردن لن يبادر إلى تنفيذ تلميحاته الخطرة، ولكنه يستعد لها بانتظار خطوات لاعبين رئيسيين كبار (الولايات المتحدة وإسرائيل)، يمكنهم أن يقتحموا المشهد السوري بفعل نوعي، يرفع الحرج عن عمان التي ستنطلق إلى القيام بدورها تحت شعار تدارك الوضع الإنساني الذي سيجد «الإخوة السوريون» أنفسهم في خضمه، وهذا قد يفتح المجال لاحقاً لإيجاد مبررات قابلة لتسويق المشاركة الأردنية في عمليات موضعية بحجة التعامل مع مخزون الأسلحة الكيميائية.

ومن اللافت أن موسكو الرسمية، التي تصر على تسمية مقررات قمة الدوحة «قرارات الجامعة العربية» حصراً، لا تعلن مواقف محددة من خطط وسيناريوات باتت تحيط اليوم بالأزمة السورية من كل جهة؛ على أن هذا «الصمت» لا يمكن فهمه باعتباره رفع يد وتسليماً بـ«القدر». ففي الجانب السوري كذلك مثل هذه البرهة التي يخفت فيها التعليق العلني على «المجريات»، ما يفتح شهية الأسئلة على طبيعة الحديث الروسي السوري وراء حجاب الصمت.

معركة جنوب سورية

 
‏الخميس‏، 04‏ نيسان‏، 2013

أوقات الشام
محمد شمس الدين

يؤشر اندلاع المعارك واحتدامها في الجهة الجنوبية لسورية، الى أن المخطط الغربي – العربي قد فشل حتى اللحظة في إخضاع شمال البلاد وعلى امتداد المدن الساحلية وصولاً الى العاصمة دمشق وأريافها، لسيطرة المسلحين الذين باتوا يتدربون على أيدي أقوى الجيوش في العالم بعد دخول الولايات المتحدة الأميركية على خط التدريب والتسليح المباشرين، بعدما كان دورها يقتصر على التوجيه في غرف العمليات التي يديرها ضباط من فرنسا وبريطانيا وبعض الدول العربية، من المناطق التركية القريبة من الحدود الشمالية.


تخضع الحرب في سورية في المرحلة الحالية لإشراف مباشر من قبل فريق عسكري اميركي، شُكّل خصيصاً لهذه الغاية، بهدف إحراز تقدّم ملموس في القتال ضد قوات الجيش السوري في محاولة لانتزاع مناطق لم تستطع المحاولات التي جرت سابقاً انتزاعها لإقامة منطقة عازلة، طالما شكلت مطلباً رئيسياً للمسلحين وما يسمى بـ»الجيش الحر» منذ بدء الأزمة في سورية تكون منطقة آمنة لهم ولإدارة نشاطهم وبالتالي إقامة الحكومة الموقتة فيها لممارسة إشرافها على ما أطلقوا عليه مناطق محرّرة أو يجري تحريرها تباعاً بحسب الرؤية الغربية للأمور.




تعهد الرئيس الأميركي باراك أوباما في لقائه بالملك الأردني – الذي أبدى خشيته من تفاقم الأوضاع السورية وامتدادها الى بلاده- بأن الحسم سيكون قريباً وهذا الحديث جرى في سياق طلب أوباما من الأردن فتح أراضيها لعمليات التدريب الأميركية للمسلحين، لأن الدراسات التي أجرتها وكالة الاستخبارات الأميركية وقيادة الجيش الأميركي في المنطقة، توصلت الى أن البقعة الأنسب لممارسة هذا النشاط هي الأردن لاعتبارات عديدة منها أن التحرك فيها وتأمين عمليات الإنزال سيكون بعيداً عن أية مخاطر أو استهدافات مباشرة للمدربين أو القوات التي تؤازرهم وتحديداً من «إسرائيل» التي نصحت بدورها الأميركيين أن يتم التمركز في الأردن بدلاً عن تركيا حيث غرفة العمليات الفرنسية – البريطانية – العربية.

غير أن الخطة الأميركية الموضوعة تلحظ أن التحرك يجب أن يكون من جنوب سورية عبر الحدود الأردنية لأنها بحسب مصادر مطلعة، الأضعف في سياق الجبهات الموزعة المفتوحة على الأراضي السورية، وعلى اعتبار أن الجيش السوري يركز قواته على جبهة الشمال وتحديداً في مدينتي حلب والرقة والذي يستعد لمهاجمتهما في عملية «قيصرية» بعدما استطاع فتح طرق الإمداد شمالاً خلال الشهرين الماضيين، ما أضعف قدرة المسلحين على التحرك وأفشل مخطط إقامة المنطقة العازلة من جهة الحدود التركية بعد محاولات استمرت قرابة السنتين.

وتركز الخطة الأميركية من خلال اختيار الجهة الجنوبية لسورية انطلاقاً من الأردن على أن يكون القتال في أقرب مسافة ممكنة من العاصمة دمشق، لأن ذلك من شأنه أن يزعزع من وضع الحكومة السورية خاصة إذا ما تم تسجيل أي تقدم يذكر على هذا المحور، وهو ما تمت محاولته بتركيز الاشتباك في محيط مدينة درعا القريبة من الحدود الأردنية وبلدة داعل التي استطاع الجيش السوري أن يقضي فيها على المسلحين بشكل كامل.

لكن سقوط داعل لن يشكل مؤشراً على سيطرة الجيش السوري نهائياً على المنطقة الجنوبية بعد الكشف أمس عن تجهيز 3 آلاف مقاتل تم تدريبهم أخيراً في الأردن باتوا على أتم الاستعداد لخوض الحرب بتكتيكات حربية أميركية، وبالطبع بتجهيز وإشراف أميركيين هذه المرة، في حين حددت صحيفة «الواشنطن بوست» موعداً لذلك، استناداً الى مصادرها بأن العملية ستكون في نيسان الجاري بدلاً من أيار أو حزيران المقبلين بعدما تم تسريع التدريبات وإنجازها بعد النتائج التي خلصت اليها مشاروات أوباما حول الأزمة السورية في كل من الأردن و«إسرائيل».

البناء
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

Camp Nama: New Details of the US-Run Torture Prison in Iraq

Camp Nama: New Details of the US-Run Torture Prison in Iraq

http://www.brussellstribunal.org/article_view.asp?id=874#.UV8IKDZwY_N


 

The full extent of the torture and abuse that took place in US-run facilities in Iraq will never be known.


According to one British serviceman who was at Nama, US soldiers would bring prisoners in every night. Photograph: Jehad Nga/Corbis


 

The Guardian has published a report based on new interviews with British soldiers who witnessed torture and abuse of Iraqi detainees at the US-run prison Camp Nama following the invasion in 2003.

“On the 10th anniversary of the invasion of Iraq,” the report says, a number of British personnel who cooperated with US forces and officials at Camp Nama “have come forward to describe the abuses they witnessed,” which include:

  • Iraqi prisoners being held for prolonged periods in cells the size of large dog kennels.
  • Prisoners being subjected to electric shocks.
  • Prisoners being routinely hooded.
  • Inmates being taken into a sound-proofed shipping container for interrogation, and emerging in a state of physical distress.

The full extent of the torture and abuse that took place in US-run facilities in Iraq will never be known. Most Americans think the scandal went no farther than a few bad apples at Abu Ghraib, where leaked photographs revealed  blood-streaked floors, detainees on dog collars, sadistic sexual abuse, evidence of homicide and more. But the true scandal was bigger. Much bigger.

The Guardian:

Suspects were brought to the secret prison at Baghdad International airport, known as Camp Nama, for questioning by US military and civilian interrogators. But the methods used were so brutal that they drew condemnation not only from a US human rights body but from a special investigator reporting to the Pentagon.

A British serviceman who served at Nama recalled: “I saw one man having his prosthetic leg being pulled off him, and being beaten about the head with it before he was thrown on to the truck.”

The abuse at Camp Nama has been reported before. One Army intelligence sergeant “told his commander three members of the counterintelligence team had hit detainees, pulled their hair, tried to asphyxiate them and staged mock executions with pistols pointed at the detainees’ heads,” The Washington Post reported in 2005. In 2006, The New York Times revealed that American interrogators at Camp Nama severely beat detainees and even shot paintball guns at them for target practice, among other cruelties.

“Torture and other abuses against detainees in U.S. custody in Iraq were authorized and routine, even after the 2004 Abu Ghraib scandal,” Human Rights Watch found in 2006. According to the report, “detainees were routinely subjected to severe beatings, painful stress positions, severe sleep deprivation, and exposure to extreme cold and hot temperatures.”

Many of these reports indicated there was official sanction of this abuse from high up the US chain of command, including full knowledge of it by Stanley McChrystal. The Guardian report adds further weight to this, revealing that UK soldiers had to go through certain procedures because US officials knew they would be in violation of international law.

…[O]ne peculiarity of the way in which UK forces operated when bringing prisoners to Camp Nama suggests that ministers and senior MoD officials may have had reason to know those detainees were at risk of mistreatment. British soldiers were almost always accompanied by a lone American soldier, who was then recorded as having captured the prisoner. Members of the SAS and SBS were repeatedly briefed on the importance of this measure.

It was an arrangement that enabled the British government to side-step a Geneva convention clause that would have obliged it to demand the return of any prisoner transferred to the US once it became apparent that they were not being treated in accordance with the convention. And it consigned the prisoners to what some lawyers have described as a legal black hole.

And what failed to stop after Abu Ghraib also did not end with Camp Nama. On May 30, 2006, “a joint US-Iraqi inspection” of an Iraqi detention facility “discovered more than 1,400 detainees in squalid, cramped conditions,” many of whom were illegally detained, according to a confidential State Department cable released by WikiLeaks. Prisoners “displayed bruising, broken bones, and lash-marks, many claimed to have been hung by handcuffs from a hook in the ceiling and beaten on the soles of their feet and their buttocks.”

The inspectors found a torture contraption where ”a hook…on the ceiling of an empty room at the facility” was “attached [to] a chain-and-pulley system ordinarily used for lifting vehicles” and that “apparent bloodspots stained the floor underneath.” All 41 prisoners interviewed by US inspectors had reported being tortured and 37 juveniles were held illegally.

Also revealed by WikiLeaks cables was the US military order Frago 242, which discouraged US forces from taking note when Iraqi interrogators engaged in torture and abuse.

Many in the media have spent the last three weeks pouring over decisions about the Iraq War, marking the 10th anniversary of the invasion. The strategic and moral case for the war was justifiably the focus of this flood of commentary, with nary a word about the rampant torture and abuse that went on in countless prisons and black cites in Iraq following the invasion. The list of Bush administration atrocities and war crimes, I suppose, is too long to get equal attention.


 

 

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!

A Libyan Report Card

Via FLC

"... Given the calls for intervention in Syria, let's consider Libya, where a modest intervention was tried...., ...., .... Toppling an evil regime or stopping a war is a profoundly moral act. But taking moral responsibility for what happens next in a country is the hard part. Bosnia-Herzegovina, 18 years after the U.S.-led intervention and the Dayton Peace Accords, is a nasty, dysfunctional state. And Bosnia-Herzegovina has advantages that Libya and Syria simply do not have. It is next-door to the European Union and has a modern history of relatively strong institutional structures compared to much of the Middle East. Bosnia was in a relatively developed part of the Ottoman Empire; Libya and Syria were in much less developed parts. But because Washington tends to overestimate its own significance in terms of its ability to alter distant societies, the following pattern will continue to emerge: a terrible war resulting in calls for humanitarian intervention, an intervention in some cases, always followed by a blame game inside the Washington Beltway after the country has slipped back into tyranny or anarchy.
Meanwhile, here is a probability: Libya's relatively short history as a strong state is over. It will go on and on as a dangerous and weakly governed area between Tunisia and Egypt. Its considerable oil resources can internally generate revenue for armed groups and politicians both...."

Weekly report on Israel's terrorism against the State of Palestine

PCHR Weekly Report: 2 civilians killed, 6 wounded, 41 abducted by Israeli troops this week

author Friday April 05, 2013 02:52author by PCHR Gaza  

In its Weekly Report On Israeli Human Rights Violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territories for the week of 28 Mar. to 03 Apr. 2013, the Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR) found that Israeli forces killed 2 Palestinian civilians and wounded a third one in Anabta village, east of Tulkarem. Two youth were wounded during an incursion into Hebron.
Israeli police abduct international Land Day protester
Israeli police abduct international Land Day protester
In addition, Israeli forces continued to use excessive force against peaceful protests in the West Bank. An Irish journalist was wounded in al-Nabi Saleh protest while a Palestinian civilian was wounded in Kofur Qaddoum protest. A Palestinian boy was wounded during a peaceful protest in the center of Hebron, in protest of the death of the Palestinian prisoner Abu Hamdiya.

Israeli attacks in the West Bank:

In the West Bank, in an excessive use of lethal force, the Israeli forces killed 2 Palestinian civilians and wounded a third one in Anabta village, east of Tulkarem. This happened when the Israeli forces stationed at Annab checkpoint, east of the said village, opened fire at a group of boys protesting in the vicinity of the checkpoint.

On 29 March 2013, an 18-year-old boy was wounded by a bullet to the right leg and another 13-year-old child was wounded by a bullet to the right side of his head when an Israeli infantry unit moved into the center of Hebron.

During the last week, Israeli forces conducted 65 incursions into Palestinian communities in the West Bank. 30 Palestinian civilians, including 3 children and a woman, were abducted.

The Israeli forces established dozens of checkpoints in the West Bank. 5 Palestinian civilians, including 4 children, were abducted at checkpoints.

During peaceful protests organized in the West Bank, the Israeli forces abducted 6 Palestinian civilians, including 4 children and Abdul Hafiz al-Hashlamoun, a photojournalist at the European agency. However, they were all released later.

Israeli has continued its efforts to create a Jewish majority in occupied East Jerusalem. A Jerusalemite was obliged to demolish a room attached to his house.

Israeli attacks in the Gaza Strip:

In the Gaza Strip, the Israeli forces continued to fire at the Palestinian fishing boats in order to minimize the allowed fishing area to 3 nautical miles instead of 6 nautical miles. Moreover, the Gaza Strip witnessed 2 airstrikes on an agricultural facility and an open land.

PCHR's fieldworkers documented 2 shooting incidents on 28 and 30 March 2013 on Palestinian fishing boats that were sailing 3 nautical miles off al-Waha resort, northwest of Beit Lahia in the north of the Gaza Strip. As a result of the attacks, the fishermen were forced to flee back to the shore fearing of being wounded or abducted. However, neither casualties nor material damage were reported.

It should be noted that on Thursday, 21 March 2013, the Israeli forces declared minimizing the allowed fishing area from 6 to 3 nautical miles, as the Israeli forces allowed fishermen to sail up to 6 nautical miles following the cease-fire agreement between Hamas and Israel in November 2012.

Additionally, 2 airstrikes were launched on Gaza City and the north of the Gaza Strip targeting an open land, a green house and a water well. No casualties were reported, but the residents of the 2 areas were frightened as a result.

Israel has continued to impose a total closure and has isolated the Gaza Strip from the outside world. During the reporting period, the border crossings between the Gaza Strip and Israel were completely closed for 4 days.

Israeli settlement activities:

The Israeli forces have continued settlement activities in the West Bank, and Israeli settlers have continued to attack Palestinian civilians and property.

On Thursday, 28 March 2013, a group of settlers, under the protection of the Israeli forces and military vehicles, raided the lands of Palestinian civilians from Silat al-Thaher village, southern of Jenin, where the evacuated "Homesh" settlement was established. According to local sources, dozens of settlers arrived at the scene in a number of buses, accompanied by large units of the Israeli forces, where they practiced some Talmudic rituals before withdrawing from the scene; no other incidents were reported.

On Friday, 29 March 2013, dozens of settlers coming from "Daniel" settlement outpost established southern of al-Khader village, southern of Bethlehem, uprooted 200 olive seedlings from al-Mustafy area, adjacent to the settlement outpost. The attacked land is the property of a 65 year old man.

On Sunday, 31 March 2013, approximately 230 settlers, some of them armed, from "Efrat" and "Gush Etzion" settlements, southern of Bethlehem, raided Solomon pools area, western of Artas village, southwestern of the city. The settlers performed some Talmudic rituals in the area, under the protection of Israeli forces. Before withdrawing, the settlers threatened that they will come back to the area on daily basis.

On Sunday, a group of settlers from "Yitzhar" settlement, established on Palestinian civilians' lands southern of Nablus, threw stones at school buses boarding students from Ramon School for Girls while on their way back to the village, northeastern of Qalqilya, from a fieldtrip to the city. As a result, an 11-year-old girl sustained cuts in the right side of her face after a stone hit her in the face. Also, many others sustained scratches because of the scattered glass.
On Monday, 01 April 2013, a group of settlers from "Ovijal" settlement , established on Palestinian lands eastern of Yatta, southern of Hebron, attacked Palestinian farmers and shepherds in Um al-'Arayes area, eastern of the city. As a result, a 45-year old farmer sustained minor bruises after he fell while the settlers were chasing the farmers.

Also on Monday, a group of settlers from "Mitzpe Yair" and "Ovijal" settlements, established on Palestinian lands in Be'r al-Ad area, eastern of Yatta, attacked shepherds of al-Nawa'ja family and beat them. The Israeli forces intervened when the shepherds attempted to defend themselves and abducted a 55-year old shepherd) and transported him to an unknown destination.

On Tuesday, 02 April 2013, dozens of settlers from "Havat Maon" settlement, established on Palestinian lands eastern of Yatta, attacked Palestinian farmers while in their farms, eastern of al-Twana village and addressed them with profane language and anti-Islam slogans. The settlers expelled the farmers and shepherds from the area, under the protection of the Israeli forces.

Also on Tuesday, a number of settlers from "Maon" settlement, established on Palestinian lands southern of Yatta, raided the farmlands in al-Hamra area, eastern of Yatta and burned a number of olive trees belonging to a 45-year old farmer.

Israeli attacks on non-violent demonstrations:

During the reporting period, the Israeli forces continued to systematically use excessive force against peaceful protests organized by Palestinians and Israeli and international activists against the construction of the annexation wall and settlement activities in the West Bank. As a result, Tommy, 70, an Irish journalist, was wounded by a bullet to the right hand in al-Nabi Saleh protest, northeast of Ramallah. Besides, a protestor was hit by a gas canister to the pelvis in Kofur Qaddoum protest, northeast of Qalqilia. Dozens of protesters also suffered from tear gas inhalation and other sustained bruises.

In the same context, the Palestinian civilians organized many peaceful protests in solidarity with the Palestinian prisoners in the Israeli jails, especially those on hunger strike. Other protests were organized to mark the 37 anniversary of the Land Day. Further, many protest were organized following the death of the Palestinian prisoner Maysara Abu Hamdiya, who suffered from cancer, at Soroka hospital in Beersheba in Israel. The Israeli forces used excessive force, as a result, a 20-year-old young man was wounded by a bullet to the right leg. Besides, many civilians suffered from tear gas inhalation and others sustained bruises.

On Wednesday April 3rd, Israeli forces attacked residents of Beit Ummar village, north of Hebron, during the funeral procession of a person to a nearby cemetery near the bypass road (60). The Israeli forces fired sound bombs and gas canisters, due to which, many persons suffered from tear gas inhalation. Following the funeral, a number of boys gathered and threw stones and empty bottles at the Israeli forces stationed at the entrance of the village. The Israeli forces in response fired rubber-coated metal bullets, sound bombs and tear gas canisters. As a result, some gas canisters fell into a house and a store.

Recommendations to the international community:

Due to the number and severity of attacks this week, the PCHR made several recommendations to the international community. Among these were a recommendation that the international community and the United Nations use all available means to allow the Palestinian people to enjoy their right to self-determination, through the establishment of the Palestinian State, which was recognized by the UN General Assembly with a vast majority, using all international legal mechanisms, including sanctions to end the occupation of the State of Palestine.

The PCHR calls upon the United Nations to provide international protection to Palestinians in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, and to ensure the non-recurrence of aggression against the Occupied Palestinian Territories, especially the Gaza Strip.

For the full text of the report, click on the link
 
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian  
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!