Friday, 19 June 2015

Chomsky and Palestine

JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs) concludes that the best way of defending “israel” and countering its de-legitimization is to allow and participate in its criticism.
10900048_968725893156504_4542697076347838841_o
Noam Chomsky is a “cultural zionist” who endorses the Jewish Zionist conquest of Palestine: He wants a softer occupation, he does NOT condemn the creation of an alien entity on a land stolen, acquired by military conquest, genocide, terrorism and ongoing atrocities but just merely condemns some mistreatment of Palestinians that give his “israel”  he supports, a bad name and bad reputation.
The “master of linguistics”, the prominent scholar, Noam Chomsky, reputed for hisaccurate, articulate and precise use of correct vocabulary, uses carefully crafted, most suitable words to express his thoughts…. So when he describe the Palestinians as: “essentially caged animals”, what does that tell of him?
Would this “master of linguistics” ever use such words to describe Jews?
This is precisely the Zionist-Jewish hate vocabulary of choice when it comes to Palestinians: “animals”
Noam Chomsky‘s role as a gatekeeper (whether intentional or not) is to  deflect attention from:
CRIMES committed by the Jewish-Zionist global network including major false flagoperations like 911.
He also deflects attention away from the supremacist ideologies of his tribe by pointing the finger at “imperialism”.
By pointing the finger at US’s crimes, he deflects attention away from the Jewish power inserted inside US governmental institutions, that shape its domestic and foreign policies virtually entirely, even against US self interest.
He is the guru of the Jewish Left, as well as the Left at large.
His influence on stifling the minds of many and framing the progressive liberal discourse should not be underestimated or ignored
Chomsky (the g-d of the Jewish left) is AGAINST  the full Liberation of Palestine, thereby arguably against the restoration of International Law. He cares more about thesurvival of “israel” and the normalization of the Jewish-Zionist project of conquestof Palestine than he cares about the Palestinians’ struggle for liberation.
Obviously, Chomsky approaches the subject of Palestine from a compromised position, his loyalty is where his heart is, where his tribe is.
Chomsky and most so called Jewish “supporters” are dedicated to the preservation and continuation of the usurping, illegitimate and illegal entity called “Israel”
By their criticism of “Israel’s” behavior instead of its illegitimacy, they deflect from the core of the problem, which is the illegality of “Israel’s” very EXISTENCE, which came to be through TERRORISM, MASSACRES, WARS of CONQUEST and GENOCIDE, crimes ongoing to this day.
By criticizing “israel”, they hope to take the steering wheel from the Jewish “Israeli” right and mellow down the face of an exponential scale ROBBERY and TERROR, into a more acceptable face, which treats the residual Palestinians a teeny weeny better, while Jewish coreligionists KEEP the LOOT.
By easing the barbaric savagery and giving the few residual Palestinians some nominal “rights”, they hope that the International Community will not turn against “Israel” and its global jewish allies.
Both Right and Left (Zionists and anti-Zionists) are dedicated to the illegal preservation of “Israel”
This is the reason why the activity of some Jewish “supporters” can be so detrimental to the Palestinian cause. Their intentions are concealed, and are contrary to / Palestinian aspirations of Freedom and Liberation.
They help preserving and finalizing the Zionist project of KEEPING the LOOT, while providing backup and coverup for the world Jewry support of the openly aggressive Jewish Zionists’ colonization, shielding it against world outrage. Thus causing immeasurable harm to those whom they are pretending to be helping.
Such harm is difficult to discern and it is far more dangerous, because it subdues the victim and leads him to a bleak destiny with total submission, without any resistance.
Those whose individual identity is entangled with “israel” being and remaining a “State for Jews” no matter under what explanation, and no matter at what the cost, cannot be considered genuine supporters of Palestine.
Those individuals whose identity is entangled with “israel” being and remaining a “State for Jews” irrespective of any pretext or explanation, cannot be considered genuine supporters of Palestine, and logically can not be considered neither as genuine defenders of “Human Rights”, to the contrary.
Palestine was a peaceful country for centuries. Since over seventy years it is a country under destructive attack from a foreign Jewish collective unable to integrate peacefully and unwilling to adhere to even the most elementary rules of human cohabitation. The majority of world Jewry Left and Right has been the major overt support of these Crimes, while covert support by deflection and diffusion of resistance, has been provided by some Jews who in essence are accomplices and collaborators of the Crimes they feign to oppose.
Noam Chomsky is part of the latter.
The litmus test of sincerity would be their views with regards to Palestinians’ aspiration of FULL LIBERATION, FULL RETURN of our exiled Nation, and FULL SOVEREIGNTY by Palestinians over our Country.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Kerry Accuses Syria of Using Chlorine, Liar!


June 18, 2015
US Regime mouthpiece John Kerry reopens the old books to dig out something to bargain with after his thugs failed strategically all over Syria accusing the Syrian government of using Chlorine against own people. Who will buy this BS? We are as much ‘absolutely certain’ that nobody will weigh his claims for several reasons.
One of the reasons would be a logical one: Why would a government regular army resort to a weapon that can be used against them and turn their achievements on the ground to the cause of losing public and international support in their fight against terror? No reason at all.
John Kerry Colin Powell redo
John Kerry Colin Powell redo
Another logical reason: Why would a regular government army troops defending their own families from attacks by imported mercenary thugs from all over the world, use any weapons against their own families?
One more logical reason then we turn to US logic: Who has the benefit of destroying Syria? Its own army or the invading armies of terrorists and their sponsors?
Now the US logic used consumed elsewhere as well says: The president and his over quarter a million armed forces are killing their own people and presenting sacrifices in thousands of martyrs and injured so he can remain in power. It is the ‘logic’ used by the US regime to invade and destroy Libya.
Some might suggest the US officials won’t lie to further their goals, whatever their or their operators goals are. Now this sounds logical except for a small fact that US officials never spoke the truth about any subject that matters for the past so many decades, who would believe them after all of this?
Let’s remember that al-Qaeda was the creation of the US regime’s ‘charity foundation’ aka CIA. And let’s not forget that al-Qaeda in Syria is called Nusra Front, which forms the backbone of the ‘Moderate Rebels’ the US regime keeps aiding, of course listed as a terrorist organization when the need was there to find an alternative due to the horrific record of crimes against humanity these ‘Moderate Rebels’ had on their hands and thus the creation of ISIS. But pausing for a moment, when terrorist groups comprised in its vast majority of foreigners have a certain goal of weakening a targeted state on the US regime target list, it does sound very much logical they’d resort to any kind of crime and any type of weapons and tools to achieve their target as long as their operators can use them in any political bargaining.
The only thing that John Kerry represents is a ‘Colin Powell’s moment’ and the only thing he has to present is another dumb lie to continue destroying Syria and the simple and naive US citizens will always at the end pay the price for it, cash and in postdated payments. But at least Mr. John Kerry, change the person who wrote the speech for the liar Colin Powell in his infamous presentation at the UNSC.
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

As-Safir Reports More of Terrorist Naim Abbas Confessions on Lebanon’s Bombings


Local Editor

Naim AbbasAs-Safir newspaper posted on Friday a report on the latest confessions of the terrorist Naim Abbas, who was behind most of the 19 bombings which stormed Lebanon between July 2013 and July 2014.

The report noted that Abbas planned to send a car bomb to the building of Al-Manar TV station in Bir Hasan, yet he was arrested by the Lebanese army intelligence in February 2014 before carrying out his plot.

The Palestinian terrorist had earlier sent a suicide bomber to blow himself up in Al-Manar television building in Bir Hasan, yet he (the bomber) missed the target and detonated his explosive belt in a van in the area of Choueifat south eastern Beirut.

In July 2013, Naim Abbas stole, helped by the Lebanese Hussein Zahran, a car on Khaldah highway and booby-trapped it in Naameh before he moved and parked it in the Palestinian camp of Sabra. Later, he drove the car to his target in Bir al-Abed parking lot and timed the explosion to occur after 55 minutes so that he could escape, according to the report.

The Lebanese paper's report also published further details about the two terrorist bombings which stormed Haret Hreik.

The terrorist Omar al-Atrash to drive the booby-trapped car from Bekaa to the area of Qasqas in Beirut as Naim Abbas was asked by the recently killed ISIL commander, Abu Walid al-Maqdesi, to guide the suicide bomber to carry out the first explosion in Haret Hreik targeting Hezbollah politburo. However, the bomber, Qutaiba al-Satem,  did not hit the target in January 2, 2014.

The second booby-trapped car that stormed Haret Hreik in January 21, 2014 was handed at Khasheqje mosque in Beirut to the Syrian bomber,  "Abu Hasan", who also failed to strike Hezbollah politburo in the area.

Source: Assafir Newspaper

19-06-2015 - 18:24 Last updated 19-06-2015 - 18:24 


Related Articles

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Our Treasonous Foreign Policy

by , June 17, 2015
If you want to know why our “war on terrorism” has failed so miserably – if you want to understand how and why the harder we fight the more enemies we have to face – thenread this recent piece in the Wall Street Journal on the evolution of the Syrian civil war, which opens with this startling query:
“In the three-way war ravaging Syria, should the local al Qaeda branch be seen as the lesser evil to be wooed rather than bombed?”
How can such a question even be conceived, let alone asked? After all, wasn’t the whole purpose of the nearly fifteen-year US military campaign in the region supposed to have been the eradication of Al Qaeda? Aren’t we being constantly reminded of the fact that another 9/11 may well be in our future if we don’t destroy “the terrorists,”denying them safe havens and pursuing them to the ends of the earth? And wasn’t it Al Qaeda thatconceivedplanned, and carried out the attacks that changed our world on that fateful September day?
Oh well, never mind that – don’t be so closed-minded! – because “This is increasingly the view of some of America’s regional allies and even some Western officials.”
As to how one could possibly justify a deal with such a devil, we are told that the Syrian war has killed 230,000 people, and 7.6 million have been forced to flee. TheJournal is taking the numbers of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a pro-rebel group, as definitive, yet others put the figure lower, ranging from roughly 140,000 to 215,000 killed. Left unsaid (by the Journal) is who did all that killing, although the clear implication is that Syrian despot Bashar al-Assad is the culprit. And while Assad’s forces have done their share of slaughtering, they have suffered a little less than 85,000 dead, at this point. The rebels, on the other hand, have seen a little over 100,000 killed. To say nothing of civilians caught in the middle….
The assumption that we have to “do something” – even something so downright crazy as allying with Al Qaeda – in order to pull off a “humanitarian intervention” flies in the face of the facts. Both sides are mass murderers. I say both sides – as in two sides – in spite of the Journal‘s insistence that this is a three-sided war:
“The three main forces left on the ground today are the Assad regime, Islamic State and an Islamist rebel alliance in which the Nusra Front – an al Qaeda affiliate designated a terrorist group by the U.S. and the United Nations – plays a major role.
“Outnumbered and outgunned, the more secular, Western-backed rebels have found themselves fighting shoulder to shoulder with Nusra in key battlefields. As the Assad regime wobbles and Islamic State, or ISIS, gains ground in both Syria and Iraq, reaching out to the more pragmatic Nusra is the only rational choice left for the international community, supporters of this approach argue.”
How do we differentiate the “pragmatic” Nusra Front – the Syrian affiliate of Al Qaeda – from ISIS, otherwise known as the “Islamic State”? The adjective “pragmatic” gives us a clue: it’s a tactical difference, not an ideological one.
They share the same ideology – a fanatical variety of Sunni fundamentalism, which seeks to take Syria back to the 12th century and eradicate all unbelievers – but differ on the means. And what does this strategic or tactical difference consist of? The Islamic State has declared its implacable hostility to the US, while, according to the Journal, the Nusra Front has allied itself with the Saudis, the Turks, and the Qataris in order to achieve their goals – and is now pressuring their Arab patrons to involve the United States.
The mind reels. But that’s nothing compared to this:
“‘It does say something when suddenly Nusra become a lot more tempting. It speaks volumes as to the severity of the situation,’ said Saudi Prince Faisal bin Saud bin Abdulmohsen, a scholar at the King Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies in Riyadh. ‘At this point we must really differentiate between fanaticism and outright monstrosity.’”
If we’re differentiating between fanaticism and outright monstrosity, then one wonders which side of the equation the Saudis come out on. Here is a regime that routinelybeheads unbelievers, which is carpet-bombing a defenseless country on its southeastern border, and which has been strongly implicated in the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. If this isn’t “outright monstrosity,” then one wonders what would qualify.
We are told that the Saudis were “reluctant” to work with Al Qaeda, but with the ascension of the savage King Salman to the throne – he’s been beheading people left and right – the alleged fact that Al Qaeda is “an avowed enemy of the House of Saud” has been impatiently brushed aside.
The truth is that the 9/11 hijackers were funded and facilitated by the Saudis, as several members of Congress who have seen the 28 redacted pages of the Senate and House intelligence committee report on 9/11 have all but come out and said: for all intents and purposes, Al Qaeda has been a wholly owned subsidiary of the House of Saud since its inception. The only reluctance involved in this relationship has been its covert nature: with King Salman in the saddle, however, the Saudis are coming out of the closet as the world’s number one sponsor of terrorism.
It seems incredible that any American commentator, let alone a newspaper that has been one of the main cheerleaders of the “war on terrorism,” would take this “lesser evil” argument seriously, and yet here we see what the attraction is:
“In recent months, however, Saudi Arabia’s new King Salman has moved to work much more closely with Doha and Ankara in supporting the Islamist-dominated rebel alliance that includes Nusra, diplomats and officials in the region say. These countries see the suffering inflicted on Syria by the Assad regime as the main reason for Islamic State’s emergence in the first place, and they prefer to see Nusra and its allies, rather than Islamic State, move into territory surrendered by Damascus.”
On this the Saudis and the neoconservatives who ginned up the Iraq war agree: it wasn’t the invasion and destruction of Iraq that unleashed ISIS – it’s all Assad’s fault!
Yet it wasn’t Assad who created the power vacuum in the region that the “caliphate” is rapidly filling. It wasn’t Assad who disbanded the Iraqi military and installed a Shi’ite majority regime in Baghdad. It wasn’t Assad who decided it was time to “drain the swamp” of the Middle East in response to the 9/11 attacks. These acts were carried out by the US government – and the Islamic State is a classic case of “blowback,” i.e. of the unintended consequences of a supremely wrong-headed policy.
It’s fairly obvious why the terrorist-supporting Saudis would want to sanitize Al Qaeda, their longtime sock puppets, but who are the US officials who back this lunatic policy?
One of them is Robert Ford, former US ambassador to Syria and now at the Middle East Institute, a Saudi front group with substantial funding from Big Oil and the major weapons manufacturers. Ford avers:
“The Turks, the Saudis and the Qataris have decided that the problem above all is to get rid of Bashar al-Assad, and the Americans don’t have leverage over them to change what they are doing. Those countries are willing to use even the extremist groups like Nusra to bring down Assad, and that determination came out of the failure of the United States to provide a viable alternative to those extremists by ramping up substantially support for more moderate groups.”
The idea that we don’t have any leverage over our Gulf allies is a joke: none of these countries would lift a finger to help the Nusra Front without the okay from Uncle Sam. If the US wanted to stop them, it would be easy enough to do so: lifting the guarantee of US protection against Iran would do the trick, not to mention the withdrawal of substantial military sales and a diplomatic freeze-out. It’s laughable to imagine that any of these states would continue to exist in their present form if the American shield was lifted.
In fact, the Saudis and their Turkish and Qatari allies are doing precisely what the US wants them to do: engaging in a regime change operation in Syria designed to overthrow Assad and usher in … a nightmare.
The virtues of the Al Qaeda-affiliated Nusra Front are paraded so brazenly by theJournalthat it almost reads like advertising copy:
“Unlike Islamic State, Nusra is largely composed of Syrians, and its religious views, though certainly radical, aren’t nearly as extreme. While it has refrained from attacking Israel despite controlling towns along the demarcation line in the Golan Heights, the group has taken on Islamic State and has been willing to work with non-Islamist rebels.”
They’re homeboys, they’re relatively moderate, and – here’s a big one – they haven’t attacked Israel, although they’re in a good position to do so. These are jihadists after own own heart!
And every advertising campaign has to feature a few endorsements. Here’s one from another former Obama administration official, who was once the President’s liaison to the Syrian rebels:
“‘Nusra has been a real magnet for young Syrian fighters who don’t have any particular jihadist or even radical sectarian agenda,’ said Frederic Hof, who served as President Obama’s envoy to the Syrian opposition and is now a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council in Washington. ‘They have found in Nusra two things. It is well-resourced…And Nusra seems to have been willing to fight the regime and not to engage in some of the corrupt activities and warlordism that you would find elsewhere within the panoply of Syrian opposition.’”
We’ve sure come a long way from “you’re either with us, or you’re with the terrorists.”
Another American fan of Al Qaeda is Adm. James Stavridis, former NATO supreme allied commander:
“It is unlikely we are going to operate side by side with cadres from Nusra, but if our allies are working with them, that is acceptable. If you look back to World War II, we had coalitions with people that we had extreme disagreements with, including Stalin’s Russia. I don’t think that is a showstopper for the US in terms of engaging with that coalition.”
The Journal reports Stavridis as saying “Washington is likely to go ‘pretty far’ in tolerating the budding collaboration between its regional allies and Nusra.” As US military equipment continues to show up in Nusra’s arsenal – and in the hands of ISIS – Washington’s game isn’t too hard to discern.
It isn’t just the Saudis, the Turks, and the Qataris who have decided that Assad is the main enemy – indeed, the only enemy – in Syria. When President Obama failed to convince the country bombing Syria was such a great idea, the regime-changers in Washington decided to farm out the job to their regional clients.
Now the real objective of our post-9/11 military rampage through the Middle East stands revealed: destroying the secular regimes that kept the Islamists in check. Instead of going after bin Laden, who stayed free under the protection of our Pakistani allies, we went after Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. Instead of preventing the Islamist takeover of Libya, we facilitated it by overthrowing Qaddafi. And now we’re repeating that scenario in Syria, taking outIsrael’s longtime enemy in Damascus – with more than a little help from our terrorist friends.
Those who invoke the murder of 3,000 Americans on September 11, 2001, to rationalize a system of universal surveillance are now collaborating with the murderers. This isn’t merely utter madness: it’s a consciously developed policy of treason.
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Israeli Circles Confirm Cooperation between Zionist Entity, Nusra Front


Local Editor

Israeli military and media circles confirmed that cooperation between the Zionist entity and Nusra Front, al-Qaeda offshoot in Syria, is rising near the occupied Golan.

Israeli Channel 10 reported that the occupation army asked the Nusra Front to halt its attack on the small Druze town of Hadar, noting that the Takfiri group responded to the Israeli demand.

cooperation between Nusra Front and Israel
Meanwhile, media circles justified the attack of the terrorist group on Hadar, saying that the southern town supports the Syrian government and that it represents point of departure for resistance attacks against the Israeli occupation forces.

“Druze in Hadar town back (President) Bashar al-Assad, and this is well known. Thus, Nusra front want to settle their account with them,” Israeli expert in Arab-Israeli conflict, Hazi Simantov told the Israeli channel 10.

For his part, Ore Heller, an Israeli military expert, warned against Druze appeals to save them from Nusra terrorists.

“We have to warn against appeals by Duze… as if al-Qaeda will commit genocide against them. They are in their villages in northern Golan, they back Assad and they don’t like Zionists,” Heller told the Israeli channel, noting that Samir al-Qintar “was touring these villages” to offer support and “recruit” their residents to operate against Israel.

Meanwhile, the Middle East expert Eyal Zisser confirmed there were contact between the Zionist entity and Nusra Front, in a bid to “organize relations on border” between the two sides.

Furthermore, Zisser accused residents of Hadar of staging attacks against the Zionist entity.

Source: Al Manar TV
19-06-2015 - 14:12 Last updated 19-06-2015 -14:12

Related 
videos


مع الحدث | وائل الحسنية | المنار 19 06 2015






آخر طبعة | فيصل الداوود - الأمين العام لحركة النضال اللبناني العربي


Related Articles

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

The Imperative of Palestinian Liberation

The increasing activities of solidarity with Palestine represents an important step in the right direction. (ActiveStills.org)
The increasing activities of solidarity with Palestine represents an important step in the right direction. (ActiveStills.org)


Before 1948, there was no country, nation-state, in historic Palestine called Israel. Israel founded itself by the conquest and exclusion of others, the Palestinians, the rightful owners of Palestine. This is the most basic fact that is often forgotten or ignored altogether among the supporters of Israel. Palestine as a name and reality that encompassed diverse ethnic populations living with each other is what that piece of land had been known for and always represented in terms of its Palestinian Mediterranean identity, not a western-supported colony, as Israel certainly is in origin.

The extraordinary concoction of the idea of ancient Israel as an effort to provide a reference point for Zionism and Israel’s establishment is so misconstrued and deliberately deceptive. Whitelam puts the record straight in his book, The Invention of Ancient Israel: The Silencing of Palestine History, when he contends that, “viewed from the longer perspective, the history of ancient Israel is a moment in the vast expanse of Palestinian history”.

The establishment of Israel is therefore an anomaly, an exceptionally unfair one at that. Israel and its supporters, however, tend to make Israel so natural and normal a state as if it has had existed for thousands of years, and as if its present Jewish population is the direct ancestors of those who trod the same territory more than two thousand years ago. Nothing could be further from the truth. What is so trampled upon and bypassed by Israeli supporters is the fact that that land is Palestinian by virtue of historical continuity, legal basis and social cohesion and ethical precedence and indeed geographical and aesthetic integrity. Palestine has been inhabited by an Arab Palestinian population that saw many small powers and empires fall and assume other political realities. This is while Palestine in the identity of its people continued until the Zionism of Israel, born and bred in Europe, drove its population away and imposed upon the land and its topographical milestones and features other names and appellations than the ones by which the country was known for amongst its native Arab Palestinian inhabitants.

Zionism as a program of power and conquest settled on peddling unethical narratives that fabricated and exercised precedence for the Jews worldwide in Palestine over the Palestinians who have had known no other land as a homeland other than Palestine, the territory over which Israel founded its colonial and unashamedly expansionist state.

Many supporters of Israel conceal or pay no attention whatsoever to this most basic of historical facts sketched briefly above, conjuring up myths and exhibiting political bravados at the expense of human and political rights. Their narrow streak of nationalism, which does not see in the Palestinians legitimate inheritors of their own land, makes them so overzealous over Israel, no matter its horrendous violations of human rights and norms on a daily basis. Such violations include further expansion of illegal settlements, besieging and starving Palestinians in Gaza, restricting Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza to small Bantustans while taking away their land and limited resources, intruding and desecrating religious sites of immeasurable spiritual significance like those in Jerusalem, confining thousands of Palestinian prisoners in squalid conditions in Israeli prisons that lack basic elements of human survival and dignity, discriminating against Palestinian Arabs inside Israel in blatant and fascistic ways as well as attempting with intransigent insensitivity to block the Palestinian narrative from being heard in international forums and arenas.

Israel and its supporters are deeply stuck in hurting the Palestinians and frustrating their aspirations towards self-determination and rectifying major historical injustices in meaningful ways that include the right of return for the Palestinians who were forcibly evicted from their homes in 1948 and who continue to suffer untold woes in refugee camps, particularly in war-disgraced Syria, vulnerable Lebanon and elsewhere.

Yet, despite the blatant fact that Israel is an apartheid state not only against the Palestinians but also exclusively privileging western Jews in particular, the insatiable narrative of Israel for security and recognition is embraced by powerful western lobbies and figures, particularly by officials at the helm of American power where Israel is treated with crazed respect. In particular, American officials seem to cower before criminal Israeli politicians like Benjamin Netanyahu, applauding him and nursing his penchant for wars.

In addition, many Israeli intellectuals and others do not see Israel as an apartheid state and resist this increasingly used description (see e.g. Benjamin Pogrund in the Guardian, 22sd May 2015). They focus on aspects where Arabs and Israelis are perceived to be treated as equal and see this equality as better than what persisted under apartheid South Africa. What is so missing from this manipulated account is the on-going historical, political and human injustices at a myriad of levels whereby Israel practices active discrimination against all Palestinian Arabs, whether they are in Israel or in the occupied Palestinian territories; and that Israel’s raison d’être as it exists is discriminatory in essence. This discrimination is underlined by Israel’s vision of itself as an exclusive territory for the Jews and its position that this exclusivity should be guarded at all costs. In the application of such exclusivity, apartheid is what Israel has achieved for itself: it does not accept Palestinians as potentially legitimate and rightful owners of Palestine and institutes a range of practices that unabatedly shuts the Palestinians out from enjoying full human and political rights in their own land. Without equal political and human rights for all the inhabitants of historic Palestine, Israel will continue to be identified by many as an apartheid state.

Yet, Israel is internalized and taken to be a haven of safety and democracy for Jews, whose terrible blight in the Second World War added momentum to the originally and indeed ever uncaring and single-mindedly colonialist Zionism. Indeed, the Holocaust against the Jews constituted a crime against humanity of the first order; and no decent, thinking human being could not sympathize with the Jewish population subjected to annihilation by such an endlessly absolutist and destructive ideology as that of Nazi Germany. Yet, no rational or decent being could accept that this colossal tragedy should be solved and covered at the expense of another population of the Palestinians whose agonies have been enormous and unbearable because of Zionism and its relentless viciousness. In addition to the litany of crimes, massacres and woes it has committed against the Palestinians since its founding, Israel continues to subject Gaza to cruel siege that leaves hundreds of thousands of people destitute and psychologically maltreated to extremes.

While the supporters of Israel blame the Palestinian Hamas and its resistance for Israel’s brutal siege, they seem to forget or are uninterested altogether in the fact that Gaza was miserable before Hamas was in charge; and that Hamas is an outcome of the countless miseries that Israel has unleashed on Gaza not only in the period between its formal annexation in 1967 and alleged withdrawal in 2005 that would mark yet another siege of the area; but since 1948 when it waged criminal raids and attacks against its overcrowded population in order to obliterate its resistance to the colonizers and the robbers of the land.

Israel has consistently failed all the offers of peace from the Palestinian side, including from Hamas, resorting instead to tactics of merciless pressure and destruction, expecting the Palestinians in Gaza and elsewhere to bow down before its perverted exercise of power. The Palestinians, including Hamas and other factions, are entitled to resist the Israeli occupation for the liberation of their land and the restoration of their rights that have been belittled and disregarded. Indeed, there is no other choice for the Palestinians except resistance, even though it is the view of this writer that this resistance must undertake the utmost care in avoiding civilian targets and civilians in general. Resistance must take human rights and ethics seriously, notwithstanding the fact that Israel is the principal instigator of violations for these rights in Palestine in the first place. But Israel must come to understand that Palestinian liberation is non-negotiable; and that the tragedies it has had inflicted on the Palestinians obstruct any chances for peace and coexistence, which is what the region urgently needs.

Needless to say that much has had happened since 1948; but the original source of the conflict, Israeli colonialism, remains the hurdle of all hurdles for peace and normality in Palestine. Israel is established and its people are there. Because of the apparent solidity of Israel with some western media behind it giving it the veneer of normality which it certainly does not deserve as a colonial state, Israel seems like an ancient stone preserved in the most well-guarded museums. It appears unaffected by the goings-on around it. The Arab world, particularly in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Libya and other areas, is wildly tearing itself apart. So many utterly inhumane practices take place in these Arab places of conflict and tragedy that Israel seems immune from it all. Israel uses this bleak picture of the present Arab world, one featuring mass violence, backwardness, corruption, rampant patriarchal practices and human deprivation to a very disturbing level, to entrench its abuses against Palestine and its people. But the persistent reality remains that Israel is an occupying power, presiding over an awful, criminal occupation in its seventh decade, and increasingly remorseless in its theft of land and aggression against the Palestinian people.

As we Palestinians live through and commemorate the tragic memory of the 67 years of eviction, occupation and destruction of our homeland since Israel was established in 1948, we see the world through the blood, sweat and tears of our grandparents and our present brothers and sisters who continue to struggle and reclaim Palestine from occupation, a Palestine that we should will to accommodate of all its citizens on a humane, inclusive and democratic basis. The great insights of the late Palestinian-American scholar Edward Said (1935-2003), who wrote as far back as 1979 in his important book The Question of Palestine, still aptly holds: “My belief is that both Palestinians and Jews in Palestine have much to gain — and obviously something to lose — from a human rights view of their common situation, as opposed to a strictly national perspective on it”.

Israeli supporters should pause to think hard about supporting a country that is mired in historical injustices which it repeats every day. No one benefits from supporting inhumanity, not even Israel itself in its descent towards further expansionism and cruelty against the Palestinians. Not least, the terrible reality of Palestinian prisoners, some held for decades now, in degrading Israeli prisons testifies to how unrepentant Israel is on robbing Palestine of its leaders, youth and socio-political sustainability. According to the latest report from the Palestinian committee for prisoners, Israel has imprisoned more than a million Palestinian since 1948, some of them perished unnoticed by the relevant humanitarian or political bodies. Nonetheless, the Palestinian memory and will cannot be bullied to irrelevance by people oblivious to human and political rights. The virtual world might have provided some uneducated, misinformed or badly-intentioned people to wade into every discussion, and to respond and play with every piece of writing that does not concur with their narrow exclusivist views of Zionism, wishing the Palestinians to vanish in silence. But the reality of the Palestinian people remains one of resistance and steadfastness against one of the most brutal and deceitful occupations in history. Many people of good will and understanding in the world have already come to see what Zionism stands for — aggression, expansionism and denial.

The increasing activities of solidarity with Palestine as led by movements such the B.D.S. movement (Boycotts, Divestment and Sanctions) which targets Israeli academic institutions complicit in the sustenance of the Israeli occupation represents an important step in the right direction. Indeed, no amount of normalization or excuses in favor of that occupation could conceal the fact that Israel is an occupying power, exercising vicious domination over a civilian population in Gaza, the West Bank and Jerusalem, a population struggling to maintain its survival and regain its abrogated rights against seemingly insurmountable Israeli pressures. It is fair that the Israelis should live in peace and security like other people; but it is neither realistic nor fair to think that this could happen with Israel’s denial of the Palestinians’ claims to their history while attempting to suppress their precious memories of their homeland.

Peace cannot happen without Israel accepting and recognizing Palestine as a dignified place and people under the sun yearning to be liberated from its dark colonial yoke.

- Atef Alshaer is a Lecturer in Arabic Language and Culture at the University of Westminster. He has several publications on the Arab world in the field of literature, language and Politics. He was educated at Birzeit University in Palestine and SOAS, University of London, where he obtained his PhD and taught for a number of years. He contributed this article to PalestineChronicle.com.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Weekly Report On Israeli Human Rights Violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (11- 17 June 2015)


Israeli forces maltreated a Palestinian civilian near al-Jalazoun refugee camp

Israeli forces continue systematic crimes in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt)

(11 – 17 June 2015)


A Palestinian civilian was killed in Kufor Malek villag as he was run down by an Israeli military jeep.

Two Palestinian civilians were wounded during peaceful protests.

Israeli navy forces opened fire twice at Palestinian fishing boats sailing off Deir al-Balah shore, but no casualties were reported.
61 pieces of fishing nets were seized and other pieces were damaged.

Israeli forces continued to open fire at border areas along the Gaza Strip.
A mentally and physically disabled boy was wounded and arrested in the south of the Gaza Strip.

Israeli forces conducted 51 incursions into Palestinian communities in the West Bank.
43 Palestinian civilians, including 10 children and 3 woman, were arrested.
14 of these civilians, including 6 children and 3 women, were arrested in occupied Jerusalem.

Israel continued to impose a total closure on the oPt and has isolated the Gaza Strip from the outside world.
Many checkpoints were established in the West Bank.
6 Palestinian civilians were arrested.

Israeli forces continued their effort to create a Jewish demographic majority in East Jerusalem.
A residential house in Beit Hanina neighbourhood, north of the city, was demolished.

Israeli forces continued to support settlement activities in the West Bank and Israeli settlers continued to attack Palestinian civilians and property.
20 dunums of agricultural lands were demolished and 60 trees were cut off, west of Bethlehem.
Olive seedlings planted in 20 dunums in Housan village, were cut off and confiscated.



Summary

Israeli violations of international law and international humanitarian law in the oPt continued during the reporting period (11 – 17 June 2015).

Shooting:
Israeli forces continued to use force against Palestinian civilians participating in peaceful protests in the oPt and against fishermen sailing within the allowed area in the sea. During the reporting period, Israeli forces killed a Palestinian civilian in Kufor Malek village, northeast of Ramallah, and wounded 3 others in the Gaza Strip and West Bank. In the Gaza Strip, Israeli forces opened fire at fishermen and chased them in the sea.

In the West Bank, on 14 June 2015, Israeli forces killed a 22-year-old civilian from Kufor Malek village, northeast of Ramallah, when they moved into the village to deliver a summons to a Palestinian to refer to the Israeli intelligence service.

Israeli forces continued to use excessive and systematic use of force against peaceful protests organized by Palestinian civilians and Israeli and international human rights activists in protest at the construction of the annexation wall and settlement activities in the West Bank and Israeli policies in the oPt. As a result, 2 civilians were wounded. Moreover, Israeli officers maltreated a Palestinian civilian suffering from epilepsy, from al-Jalazoun refugee camp north of Ramallah.

In the Gaza Strip, on 13 June 2016, an 18-year-old civilian suffering from mental and physical disability was wounded when Israeli forces stationed along the border fence, east of Rafah in the south of the Gaza Strip, opened fire at him. The aforementioned person sustained wounds to the legs and was arrested and taken to Soroka Hospital in Beersheba in Israel.

In the context of targeting fishermen, on 11 June 2015, Israeli gunboats stationed off Deir al-Balah shore in the central Gaza Strip opened fire at 3 fishing boats sailing 4 nautical miles off the shore. They chased the fishing boats for over 2 hours and cut and confiscated fishing nets belonging to 8 fishermen. A similar attack on fishermen occurred on 16 June 2015.

Incursions:

During the reporting period, Israeli forces conducted at least 51 military incursions into Palestinian communities in the West Bank and 5 ones in East Jerusalem. During these incursions, Israeli forces arrested at least 43 Palestinians, including 10 children and 3 woman.  Fourteen of these civilians, including 6 children and the 3 women, were arrested in East Jerusalem.


Restrictions on movement:

Israel continued to impose a tight closure of the oPt, imposing severe restrictions on the movement of Palestinian civilians in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, including occupied East Jerusalem.

The illegal closure of the Gaza Strip, which has been steadily tightened since June 2007 has had a disastrous impact on the humanitarian and economic situation in the Gaza Strip.  The Israeli authorities impose measures to undermine the freedom of trade, including the basic needs for the Gaza Strip population and the agricultural and industrial products to be exported. For 8 consecutive years, Israel has tightened the land and naval closure to isolate the Gaza Strip from the West Bank, including occupied Jerusalem, and other countries around the world. This resulted in grave violations of the economic, social and cultural rights and a deterioration of living conditions for 1.8 million people.  The Israeli authorities have established Karm Abu Salem (Kerem Shaloum) as the sole crossing for imports and exports in order to exercise its control over the Gaza Strip’s economy.  They also aim at imposing a complete ban on the Gaza Strip’s exports. The Israeli closure raised the rate of poverty to 38.8%, 21.1% of which suffer from extreme poverty. Moreover, the rate of unemployment increased up to 44%, which reflects the unprecedented economic deterioration in the Gaza Strip.
Efforts to create Jewish majority
House demolitions

On 17 June 2015, bulldozers belonging to the Israeli municipality in East Jerusalem demolished a house belonging to the family of Tamer Jamal Edris in Beit Hanina neighbourhood, north of the city.

Settlement activities

Israel has continued its settlement activities in the oPt, a direct violation of international humanitarian law, and Israeli settlers have continued to attack Palestinian civilians and property.

On 11 June 2015, bulldozers of the Israeli municipality levelled large areas of agricultural lands in Fouqin Valley Village, west of Bethlehem.

On 15 June 2015, Israeli forces confiscated grocery stalls established by Palestinians in this time of the year along bypass road 60. They also order the owners of the stalls not to come back to that area.

On Monday morning, 15 June 2015, Israeli forces demolished a barrack used as a carwash in Beit Ta'mar area, in al-Fardous village, east of Bethlehem.

Moreover, on the same day, Israeli forces cut off olive seedlings planted in 20 dunums in Housan village, west of Bethlehem. They also confiscated the seedlings they cut off.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!