Friday, 16 August 2019

Paul Findley: A Man of Courage



Global Research, August 14, 2019
Paul Findley one of the most remarkable Congressmen that the US House of Representatives had produced since the Second World War passed away on the 9th of August 2019. He was 98 years old. He was first elected to Congress in 1960 from a district in Illinois once represented by Abraham Lincoln, his immortal hero.  Findley was elected 11 times from that constituency until his defeat in 1982.
As a Congressman, he played a significant role in the formulation of the War Powers Act which required the US president to notify Congress of foreign military engagements. He was also critical of wasteful pentagon spending. He was one of a handful of early legislators who opposed the Vietnam War.
But Findley’s “notoriety” is associated with something else. He was a consistent critic of the influence of the Israel Lobby over Congress. He could see how the Lobby shaped US policies especially in West Asia. He was very much aware of the tactics the Lobby employed to silence anyone who questioned even mildly the biasness of the US position in the Israel-Palestine/ Arab conflict.
Findley himself was a victim of the Lobby’s vicious targeting. Because of his concern over the conflict he had visited the late Palestinian leader, Yasser Arafat, who was then regarded by the US government as a “terrorist.” That visit became cannon-fodder for the Israel Lobby to mount a massive campaign against Findley which was one of the main reasons for his defeat in the 1982 Congressional election.
Following his defeat, he wrote a couple of books about the power of the Lobby in US public life and how institutions and individuals were confronting the Lobby. They Dare to Speak Out had a bigger impact outside the US than within. His next book, Deliberate Deceptions, revealed the nexus between US and Israel forged through money, corporate links and personal relationships. Findley was now perceived by the US Establishment as a staunch opponent of Israeli power over the US.
His explorations into Israeli and Zionist power in the US invariably compelled him to look into how that power determined public perceptions of Islam and Muslims in general. His tentative perspective on the issue received a boost when he was invited to participate in a workshop in Penang, Malaysia on perceptions of Islam and Muslims in the Western media organised by JUST in October 1995. That workshop, as Findley had observed many times since changed his outlook on not only Islam but also the West’s relationship with a civilization which often invoked negative sentiments especially among the ‘educated.’ He began to realise that the roots of the antagonism towards the religion and its followers were deeply embedded in the West’s history and entangled with the crusades and colonialism  and post-colonial structures of global power and dominance.
On his return he produced a Friendly Note on his Muslim Neighbour which was widely circulated and later authored a book entitled Silent No More that sought to demolish America’s false images of Islam and Muslims. The book sold 60,000 copies.
As Findley’s mission to combat ignorance about, and prejudice against, another civilisation was beginning to make some progress, it suffered a severe setback through two major events at the start of the new century. Both the destruction of the twin towers in New York on the 11th of September 2001 — the infamous 9-11 incident — which was the rationale for the US helmed ‘War on Terror’ and the Anglo-American invasion of Iraq in March 2003 made bridge-building between Christians and Muslims a monumental challenge. Nonetheless, Findley persevered. He continued to lend support to the work of the Council on American—Islamic Relations (CAIR) and other such causes.
His last correspondence with me was in January 2016. He had written an article for the JUST Commentary January 20, 2016 entitled, “Truth Seeking About Islam.”  He lamented that his eye-sight was failing — though his spirit was still high.
Findley was a man of extraordinary courage. The positions he adopted on Israeli power or on Palestinian rights or on justice for Muslims in the US incurred the wrath of many. He was often isolated and marginalised. But he never abandoned his principles.
The tenacity with which he adhered to them was what made him a man of integrity and dignity. He knew the price would be heavy.  But it was a price he was prepared to pay.
It is this — his moral conduct in the face of adversity — that will be his lasting legacy.
*
Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Dr. Chandra Muzaffar is the President of the International Movement for a Just World (JUST), Malaysia. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

الأميركيون يهزمون الأتراك والسعوديين في اليمن الجنوبي



أغسطس 15, 2019

د. وفيق إبراهيم

التداعيات السياسية للمعارك العسكرية الضخمة التي اندلعت منذ ايام عدة في مدينة عدن في جنوبي اليمن، كشفت عن تراجع كبير للنفوذ السعودي وهزيمة بنيوية لتركيا المختبئة خلف حزب التجمع اليمني التابع للأخوان المسلمين.

تبدأ أهمية هذه المعارك باندلاعها في عدن عاصمة الجنوب اليمني، وأهمّ مدينة ساحلية فيه، تشرف على الملاحة جيئة وذهاباً بين مضيق هرمز وبحر عدن المتفرع نحو باب المندب من جهة والمحيط الهندي من جهة أخرى، لذلك فإنّ السيطرة عليها لها أبعاد يمنية ودولية في آن معاً. ولا يمكن لها أن تكون مستقلة عن النفوذ الأميركي لأنّ دولة الإمارات لا تدخل في نزاعات في وجه النفوذ السعودي إلا في حالتين: إما بتواطؤ معه ضدّ طرف ثالث أو بإيحاء أميركي أو بالاثنين معاً، لكن التأييد الأميركي من الضروريات في كلّ الاحتمالات، خصوصاً لمعارك تنشب على خط التجارة العالمي والممر البحري لـ 18 مليون برميل نفط يومياً.

لذلك فإنّ حرب عدن هي حرب التحالفات الأميركية في اليمن، وبإشرافها لأسباب تحتاج الى التعمق في التفسير وبشكل تدريجي.

أولاً، نجح أنصار الله مع حلفائهم في التحصن في الشمال وجزء من الوسط والجنوب والساحل الغربي، انطلاقاً من بقعة عصية تاريخياً لبسالة أهلها وجغرافيتها الجبلية، وسرعان ما انتقلوا الى اختراق حدود السعودية في جيزان وعسير ومجمل المناطق اليمنية المحتلة من الطرفين السعودي والإماراتي بهجمات برية وطائرات مسيرة وصواريخ مدمرة، بدلت من توازنات القوة وثبتت أنصار الله معادلة يمنية أساسية للزوم مجابهة المستعمر الأميركي والسعودي والاماراتي وليس للقتال مع أطراف داخلية يمنية.

ثانياً: استولد هذا التفوق اليمني في المناطق الشمالية صراعاً بين مكونات الجنوب اليمني على خلفية سعي المحتلين السعودي الإماراتي الاستئثار بالنفوذ، فأمسك ولي العهد السعودي بفريق عبد ربه منصور هادي واعلنوه رئيساً مستمراً لليمن، لكنه بدا ضعيفاً غير وازن، وغافل عن مجريات الصراع الداخلي، حتى ان نائبه علي محسن الأحمر بدا أقوى منه على مستوى التفاعلات الداخلية ويمتلك قوى عسكرية مقبولة.

بالمقابل اسست الإمارات فريقاً يمنياً مواليا لها في الجنوب وأغدقت عليه المساعدات واستغلت بعض النزاعات الانفصالية لقواه فبنت عليها، وطورتها ليصبح مجلساً انتقالياً بقيادة شخصيتين طموحتين وانفصاليتين هما عيدروس الزبيدي وبن بريك أما بن سلمان فاستمرّ بمراهناته على شخصيات تحمل ألقاباً إنما من دون وزن فاعل على الأرض.. ممسكاً بمنصور هادي أسير قصر في الرياض لا يظهر فيه الا عند الحاجة السعودية لاستعماله بإصدار بيان يؤيد فيه حامي الحرمين الشريفين المزعوم وابنه وليّ العهد بمعنى أنه رئيس مجرد من كل أنواع الصلاحيات.

هذا ما دفع بإبن سلمان للبحث عن تدعيم وزن السعودي الضعيف شعبياً في اليمن مكتشفاً أن الإمارات أمسكت بالتيارات الانفصالية ولم يبق الا التيارات الجنوبية المعادية للتقسيم أو حب التجمع اليمني للاصلاح المنتمي للأخوان المسلمين.

إزاء الانسداد الذي جابه السعوديون في الجنوب عكفت المخابرات السعودية على دراسة تحالف فعلي مع أخوان مسلمي اليمن لتعديل موازين القوى الشعبية. وكانت تريد قطع العلاقة بين إصلاح اليمن وأخوان تركيا في حزب العدالة لأن السعودية تناصب الاخوان المسلمين العداء الكامل في العالمين العربي والإسلامي لأسباب أيديولوجية. فالاخوان يرفضون التوريث في الحكم ويريدونه في إطار الشورى. وهذا ما يرفضه آل سعود. لذلك تناصب السعودية تركيا العداء في كل سياساتها باستثناء إدلب فتحرضها هناك للاستمرار في احتلالها لأنها تعتبر الدولة السورية أكثر خطراً عليها من الأخوان.

لقد جذب السعوديون الاصلاح اليمني لاستعمالهم في وجه المجلس الانتقالي الجنوبي كقوة يمنية شعبية، معتقدين بإمكانية التخلص منهم في مراحل لاحقة. وبالفعل ازدادت فعالية «الاصلاح» في الجنوب اليمني حتى بات منافساً «للانتقالي» ومتطوراً في العديد من المناطق على خلفية رفضه للتفتيت. أي أنه يسعى الى يمن موحد يشكل الاخوان فيه قوة وازنة. ولتمرير مشروعه، بالغ في تأييد عبد ربه منصور هادي لكسب رضا السعودية من دون اقتراف اي خطأ سياسي أي يبيع ولاءاته في الاعلام مثلهما نفوذاً متزايداً في الشارع اليمني. حتى أصبحت رئاسة هادي فارغة معدومة الحيل والقوة، لا يجري استعمالها الا لالتقاط صور لرئيس وهمي، يريد «تشريع» الاحتلال السعودي لليمن، وتغطيته في تحويل اليمن بكامله مستعمرة سعودية.

لقد تواكبت هذه المنافسات السعودية الاماراتية مع مرحلة وصول حربهما مع أنصار الله الى مرحلة التراجع.. فالانسداد المشرف على بدء الهزائم. وكان طبيعياً أن تفكر الامارات بالانسحاب منها خصوصاً بعد نشوب اعتراضات من بعض الأمراء فيها على الاستمرار حتى أن الأمير بن مكتوم منهم قال إن صاروخاً يمنياً واحداً يعطل الاستقرار في دبي وأبو ظبي.

لذلك وضعت الامارات خطة لسحب تدريجي لقواتها من اليمن، إنما على اساس التمسك بمشاريعها السياسية فيه عبر وكلائها المحليين.. ولأن لا يصدف، أن يحدث تحرك عسكري إماراتي من دون الاستئذان المسبق من المعلم الأميركي فيكتشف المراقب بسهولة أن غمزة أميركية خفيفة كانت كافية لبدء حرب عدن التي استفاد منها الأميركيون بإنهاء حزب الإصلاح ببعده التركي الاخواني وانتفع الاماراتيون بتمتين نفوذهم في اليمن الجنوبي دافعين الامور الى مفاوضات جديدة، بدأت بالاعتراف السعودي بتغيّر موازين القوى اليمني وذلك في اللقاء الذي جمع في قصر مِنى السعودي بين آل سعود وآل زايد. إلا ان تقاسم المناطق اليمنية مرجأ الى لقاء جديد في قصر جدة السعودي بين الفريقين السعودي الاماراتي بحضور هادي إذا كان صاحياً والمجلس الانتقالي المستعجل لإعلان دولة اليمن الجنوبي قبل حدوث تبديلات في موازين القوى.

وللمزيد من السخرية، يعلن الزبيدي ولاءه الكامل لهادي مثنياً على الدور السعودي ومنتظراً إعلانه رئيساً لليمن الجنوبي بقرار أميركي. وبذلك تكون تركيا خاسراً كبيراً في معارك اليمن مع منافستها السعودية التي تكتفي بتعويض معنوي لغوي يحفظ لها ملكها في شبه جزيرة العرب. وكيف تنجح في حماية هذا الملك فيما يواصل محمد بن سلمان عروضه الهزلية مع محاولة الاحتماء بالأميركيين والعدو الاسرائيلي وبنحو ستين دولة دعاها للمشاركة في حماية أمن الملاحة في البحار العربية كتغطية لصون عرشه المتداعي في مملكة آل سعود.

Related Videos
Related News

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

CHINA OR RUSSIA TESTING SPACE WEAPONS?

South Front

 15.08.2019

China Or Russia Testing Space Weapons?

The US Air Force’s Outer Space Monitoring Service spotted the explosion of the third stage of a European Ariane 4 space rocket, the 18th US Air Force’s outer space control squadron reported on August 14.

According to the report, the third stage of the Ariane 4 rocket exploded in orbit and seven fragments were discovered. Prior to the destruction, the discarded rocket stage had orbited the Earth for nearly 27 years at an altitude ranging from 1,404 to 1,296 kilometres.

The Ariane-4 is a European disposable medium-class carrier rocket. It was used from 1988 to 2003. In 1992, the rocket launched three satellites into orbit: the US-French Topex / Poseidon, South Korea’s Kitsat-1 and France’s S80/T.

18 SPCS@18SPCS
 confirmed that the breakup of ARIANE 42P R/B (SCC#
22079) occurred on July 22, 2019, @ appx 0917 UTC. Tracking 7 associated
pieces – no indication caused by collision.
18 people are talking about this

The 18th US Air Force reported that there was no indication that the incident was caused by “collision”. Therefore, the stage somehow ‘exploded on its own.’ This is a very suspicious claim.

It could be possible that the 18th US Air Force’s outer space control squadron just observed some space weapons testing. It’s unlikely that the test was conducted by the US because in this event it would not report the incident. EU states do have better targets than their own rocket to test such weapon systesm.

So, it could be possible that the rocket was destroyed by some Chinese or Russian weapon systems.

MORE ON THE TOPIC:

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Ezzidine to Al-Ahed: I Will Serve Hezbollah March that Was Baptized With Blood, Sacrifice



Hezbollah MPs and ministers should be attested for their relentless endeavor to serve their people and society. Both their friends and foes know this fact. Those closely following the magnitude of the files that Hezbollah is responsible for and the degree of effort they are exerting understand the true meaning of the concept of “Hezbollah Secretary General’s trust”. This confidence means a lot to anyone who is chosen by the Hezbollah leadership to represent the party no matter what their responsibilities may entail.
Hezbollah’s candidate for the by-elections in the Tyre constituency, Sheikh Hassan Ezzedine, underscored this point.
Sheikh Ezzedine extended his gratitude to the leadership that placed such a degree of confidence in him.
“It will be a great responsibility for me, I hope I am worthy of it,” the candidate says.
In a statement to al-Ahed News, Ezzedine vowed to “strive to serve the path of the resistance and martyrs. I will also be a servant of this march, which was baptized with blood and the sacrifices of the wounded, the captives and their families.”
Moreover, he promised to stay on their path and approach. “This path that gave so much in the way of sacrifices is imperative when it comes to serving the people that can only be described as “the whole good” as the Messenger of Allah [PBUH] said”.
Ezzedine only hopes that he can live up to their expectations, carry their agonies and hopes and live their pains.
He also promised to be a resounding voice in the defense of these people and their demands as well as to be the cure that alleviates the pain of those who sacrificed in this march and were an essential part of its progress.
Hezbollah’s candidate stressed that he will be a deputy for all of Lebanon. He will be among the people of Tyre. He promised to live with their joys and sorrows, embrace their issues and be vocal when it comes to demanding what they aspire to and want to be.
“What I can do, I will do to the fullest. And what I cannot do, I will continue to fight for,” Ezzedine added. “Especially for our people in the resilient South and the Tyre District.”
“I will be the voice that responsibly carries the trust to serve these people,” he concluded.
Ezzeddine in brief
– He was born in Maaroub – Tyre District in 1953.
– His name was tabled as a candidate in the 1992 election – the first polls that Hezbollah participated in.
He held several positions within the party, including:
– Hezbollah central media official after the 2000 liberation.
– Head of the Arab Relations Unit to date.
– Today he is Hezbollah’s candidate for the Tyre seat in the September 15, 2019 by-elections.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Two US congresswomen barred from visiting Israel for backing BDS

Thu Aug 15, 2019 03:31PM [Updated: Thu Aug 15, 2019

US Congresswomen Rashida Tlaib (L) and Ilhan Omar (Photo by AP)
US Congresswomen Rashida Tlaib (L) and Ilhan Omar (Photo by AP)

Israel has decided to prevent two American congresswomen from traveling to the occupied territories over their support for a boycott of the Tel Aviv regime.
Ilhan Omar, a representative for Minnesota’s 5th congressional district, and Rashida Tlaib, a representative for Michigan’s 13th congressional district, are expected to visit Israel and the Palestinian territories at the weekend.
Omar, with a Somali origin and Tlaib, with Palestinian roots, have openly supported the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel and been outspoken in their criticism of the Israeli crimes against Palestinians.
The movement was initiated in 2005 by over 170 Palestinian organizations and later became international.
Israeli deputy foreign minister Tzipi Hotovely said on Thursday Tel Aviv had decided not to allow the members of US Congress to enter Israel.
“We won’t allow those who deny our right to exist in this world to enter Israel. In principle this is a very justified decision,” she told the Kan public broadcaster.
Earlier in the day, AFP quoted an Israel official as saying that prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu held consultations on the visit on Wednesday and a final decision was being weighed.
“There is a possibility that Israel will not allow the visit in its current proposed format,” the official said, adding, “Professional teams and legal counsel in various government ministries are continuing to examine the decision.”
The official further said that according to Israeli law, the interior minister who is now Aryeh Deri has the authority to decide on the issue.
Deri, 60, is the chairman of Shas, an ultra-Orthodox Jewish political party in Israel. Back in 1999, he was convicted of bribery, fraud, and breach of trust, and received a three-year prison sentence.
“If Congresswoman Tlaib makes a humanitarian request to visit her family, the decision on her matter will be considered favorably,” the official noted.
Israel’s Knesset in 2017 passed a law banning entry to foreigners who support BDS, which is meant to initiate “various forms of boycott against Israel until it meets its obligations under international law” and ends its occupation of Palestinian lands.
Omar has accused the Tel Aviv regime of discrimination against Palestinians similar to apartheid.
In January, she enraged the large pro-Israel contingent in Congress, particularly the largely Democratic US Jewish community, by mocking America’s branding of Israel as a democracy.
Additionally on Thursday, American President Donald Trump urged Tel Aviv not to show “weakness” and firmly prevent the pair from visiting Israel.
Donald J. Trump
✔@realDonaldTrump
It would show great weakness if Israel allowed Rep. Omar and Rep.Tlaib to visit. They hate Israel & all Jewish people, & there is nothing that can be said or done to change their minds. Minnesota and Michigan will have a hard time putting them back in office. They are a disgrace!
48.1K people are talking about this
Israeli decision on US congresswomen ‘outrageous’: Palestinian official
Meanwhile, a senior Palestinian official described Israel’s decision to bar two US congresswomen from visiting the Palestinian territories as “an outrageous act of hostility.”
“The Israeli decision to ban Congresswomen Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar from visiting Palestine is an outrageous act of hostility against the American people and their representatives,” Hanan Ashrawi, a senior member of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), said in a statement.
“This is a dangerous precedent that defies all diplomatic norms and an assault on the Palestinian people’s right to engage with the rest of the world,” she said.
Both women, who became the first Muslim members of the House of Representatives in January, have faced accusations of anti-Semitism, which they firmly deny.
Israeli ambassador to the US Ron Dermer had previously signaled that the pair would be allowed to visit out of respect for Washington.
Omar and Tlaib’s support for BDS comes at a time when Trump has stepped up ties with Tel Aviv and stopped Palestinian aid.
Israel and its allies in Washington have long railed against calls for people and groups across the world to cut economic, cultural and academic ties to the occupying regime.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Thursday, 15 August 2019

Gibraltar releases Iran-operated tanker despite US pressure

Thu Aug 15, 2019 02:40PM [Updated: Thu Aug 15, 2019 04:35PM ]

This file photo taken on July 20, 2019, shows Gibraltar defense police officers guarding the Iranian-operated oil tanker Grace 1 as it sits anchored after being seized last month by British Royal Marines off the coast of Gibraltar, southern Spain. (Photo by Reuters)
This file photo taken on July 20, 2019, shows Gibraltar defense police officers guarding the Iranian-operated oil tanker Grace 1 as it sits anchored after being seized last month by British Royal Marines off the coast of Gibraltar, southern Spain. (Photo by Reuters)
Gibraltar’s government has released an Iranian-operated supertanker, which was seized by British marines in the Strait of Gibraltar on July 4, despite pressure from the United States for the vessel’s continued detainment.
“Authorities in Gibraltar have released the Iranian supertanker Grace 1, which was seized on July 4 on suspicion it was shipping 2.1 million barrels of crude oil to Syria in breach of EU sanctions,” Reuters quoted the Gibraltar Chronicle as reporting on Thursday.
According to the report, the chief justice of Gibraltar’s supreme court, Anthony Dudley, said there was no US application currently before the court.
Chief Justice Anthony Dudley said that since Iran had guaranteed in writing that the destination of the Grace 1 would not be a country “subject to European Union sanctions… there are no longer reasonable grounds to suspect that the detention of the Vessel is required.”
Spain’s Foreign Ministry reported after the incident that the UK had seized the vessel at the request of the US, which has been trying to trouble Iran’s international oil vessels as part of its campaign of economic pressure against the Islamic Republic.
Gibraltar Chronicle
✔@GibChronicle
Authorities in  have released the Iranian supertanker Grace 1, which was seized on July 4 on suspicion it was shipping 2.1m barrels of crude oil to Syria in breach of EU sanctions.
244 people are talking about this
Earlier on Thursday, Gibraltar said that the US had applied to seize the Iranian-operated oil tanker after British media reported that the vessel’s release was imminent following a set of diplomatic exchanges between Tehran and London.
“The US Department of Justice has applied to seize the Grace 1 on a number of allegations which are now being considered,” the Gibraltar government said in a statement.
It added that the “matter will return to the Supreme Court of Gibraltar at 4 p.m. (1400 GMT) today.”
A diplomatic dispute broke out between Iran and the UK on July 4, when Britain’s naval forces unlawfully seized Grace 1 and its cargo of 2.1 million barrels of oil in the Strait of Gibraltar under the pretext that the supertanker had been suspected of carrying crude to Syria in violation of the European Union’s unilateral sanctions against the Arab country.
However, reports show the confiscation took place upon a call by the US.
Tehran rejected London’s claim that the tanker was heading to Syria, slamming the seizure as “maritime piracy.”
Iran’s Ports and Maritime Organization said Tuesday that Britain was expected to soon free Grace 1, after the two sides exchanged certain documents to pave the way for the supertanker’s release.
Iran’s FM: Trump’s piracy attempt indicates his contempt for law
Soon after the report emerged about the release of the Iranian-operated tanker, Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif took to Twitter noting that the seizure of the tanker proved the Trump administration’s contempt for the law.
“This piracy attempt is indicative of Trump admin’s contempt for the law,” Iran’s top diplomat said.
Javad Zarif
✔@JZarif
Having failed to accomplish its objectives through its —including depriving cancer patients of medicine— the US attempted to abuse the legal system to steal our property on the high seas.
This piracy attempt is indicative of Trump admin’s contempt for the law.
489 people are talking about this
Zarif added that the US effort to prevent release of the Iranian tanker was aimed at abusing “the legal system to steal our property on the high seas.”
He said this vain attempt followed the US failure in achieving its anti-Iranian goals through economic terrorism.
‘US faced humiliating defeat in its effort to prevent tanker’s release’
Following the decision by the Gibraltar court, Iran’s Ambassador to UK Hamid Baeidinejad said in a tweet on his official Twitter page that the decision by the officials of Gibraltar put an end to 40 days of illegal seizure of the tanker, which carries the Iranian oil.
Hamid Baeidinejad@baeidinejad
لحظاتی پیش با تصمیم مقامات جبل الطارق و تایید دادگاه، نفتکش حامل نفت ایران از توقیف غیرقانونی آزاد گردید.کشورمان درتمامی۴۰ روز گذشته بامشارکت نهادهای ذیربط داخلی تحت مدیریت وزارت خارجه گفتگوهای مستمری در سطح سیاسی،حقوقی و فنی با طرف انگلیسی برای رفع این اقدام غیرقانونی انجام داد.
86 people are talking about this
“Up to the last minute, the United States tried in vain to prevent the release of the tanker, but was faced with a humiliating defeat,” Iran’s UK envoy added.
Hamid Baeidinejad@baeidinejad
آمریکا با تلاشهای مذبوحانه ی آخرین لحظه ی خود قصد داشت مانع رفع توقیف نفتکش شود که با شکست تحقیرآمیزی مواجه شد.
با تلاشهای روزهای گذشته تمام مقدمات و تمهیدات فنی لازم برای حرکت نفتکش به دریای آزاد نیز تامین شده است و کشتی بزودی منطقه ی جبل الطارق را ترک خواهد نمود.
43 people are talking about this
Baeidinejad stated that all preliminary steps have been taken to ensure the tanker’s movement toward free waters and “the vessel will soon leave the Gibraltar region.”
Related Vidoes
Related News

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!

Pakistan’s Incomplete Independence Day



By Adam Garrie
The profound Choudhry Rahmat Ali was not only the inventor of Pakistan’s name but in great part he was the inventor of Pakistan’s purpose. His seminal 1933 work Now or Never; Are We to Live or Perish Forever? also know as the Pakistan Declaration outlined the supreme necessity of a south Asian homeland for Muslims as a rampart against violent, terror and mayhem. Choudhry Rahmat Ali also named Pakistan for each of its western provinces with the ‘K’ in Pakistan standing for Kashmir.
And yet whilst much of Kashmir stands annexed by India against the wishes of the Kahmiri people, Pakistan’s own independence is thoroughly incomplete. The importance of the two-nation theory that Choudhry Rahmat Ali argued for with such clarity is now beyond dispute. The key to Pakistan’s sustained survival now rests upon the completion of its liberating mission by securing the peace and freedom of Kashmiris.
The road ahead is a dark one and it is a grim one but the necessity of such persistence remains of paramount importance for the Pakistani state.
Because Pakistan was founded on an ideal, there is a grave danger that when politicians grow complacent, the very purpose of the nation will flounder and when this happens, the floodgates will be opened and those who never wanted Pakistan to be born and who cannot live with the reality that Pakistan was born, will rush in to do the dirty works they have perfected for over half a century.
The annexation of Kashmir is the fault not only of the hundreds of thousands of heavily armed soldiers setting upon Kashmiris as they sleep but it is also the fault of complacent rulers whose selfish mindsets allowed the rape of Kashmir to turn into an outright slaughter.
Today, on Pakistan’s independence day, celebrations are not in order. Today ought to be one of sorrow, mourning and anger. The Kashmiri people have been betrayed by the world and as such, Pakistan’s own national mission has yet to be fulfilled. Until all of Kashmir is peaceful and secure, Pakistan will only be a partly rather than a fully free and independent state.

River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian   
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Blog!