I have many doubt about the "holocaust" particularly since I'm aware that the Jews themselves were responsible for far greater acts of genocide than the holocaust even if official jewish figures were to be believed.
But what brings even more doubt to my mind are the acts carried out nearly on a daily basis by Jews which can only be described as "nazi like behavior". Here are just a few recent examples from the last few days.
Jewish settlers beat up 6 year old Palestinian boy
http://newsinfo.inquirer....s-beat-up-palestinian-boy/
Israeli soldiers film themselves humiliating a bound Palestinian man
Saed Bannoura - IMEMC
http://www.imemc.org/article/57585
A Healthy Palestinian Prisoner Operated on Without His Consent - Another Israeli Preach of human rights
http://palestinian.ning.com/
New DCI report: increased settler attacks against children
Defence for Children International
http://www.dci-pal.org/en...ocId=870&CategoryId=1
IOF soldiers use stones to break the bones of Palestinian workers
Palestinian Information Center
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=48666
United Nations Food Aid Intended for 750,000 Palestinian Refugees in Gaza Blocked by Israel
Hiyam Noir, PalestineFreeVoice
http://palestinefreevoice...ood-aid-intended-for.html
Israeli Soldiers kidnap children in east Jerusalem
Saed Bannoura - IMEMC
http://www.imemc.org/article/57691
To the People of Cuba: Is Washington Preparing a “Soft Coup”? The
Co-optation of Cuban Intellectuals
-
The Cuban Revolution constitutes a fundamental landmark in the history of
humanity, which challenges the legitimacy of global capitalism. In all
major re...
1 hour ago
10 comments:
Ah yes. Here are the real Nazis:
www.palestinefacts.org/pf_mandate_grand_mufti.php
http://www.factsofisrael.com/blog/archives/000556.html
http://www.factsofisrael.com/en/images/articles/palestinian-nazis.jpg
More:
http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/pictures/PalestinianNaziSalute01.jpg
http://www.honestreporting.com/images/papoliceheil.jpg
http://rightwingerz.com/wp-content/FatahYouth.jpg
And more:
http://www.aijac.org.au/review/2001/images/arabic_mein_kampf.jpg
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Gallery/18.htm
http://bp1.blogger.com/_bG9aGH8yrpU/RsuvALeQWnI/AAAAAAAAANo/eSu8TGKFm7M/s1600/realholocaust.jpg
And still more:
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/index_files/BlessHitler.jpg
ARAB NAZIS IN NEW YORK
THE REAL NAZIS: NOPE. IT'S NOT THE NORWEGIANS
MEIN KAMPF FOR SALE, IN ARABIC: A BESTSELLER IN THE PLO-OCCUPIED PARTS OF ISRAEL
We won't tolerate that here in OUR land.
"Little green footballs" indeed, you are getting desperate. It's a well known racist Jew myth inventing site.
The Mufti wasn't a myth. He was a big supporter of the Nazis:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Amin_al-Husayni#In_Nazi-occupied_Europe
As to his popularity, give me a break. He didn't become mufti of Jerusalem with his looks.
The difference between him outright supporting Nazi Germany and Jews negotiating with them was that for him, it was a-priori the position:
Back in the summer of 1940 and again in February 1941, al-Hussayni submitted to the German government[109] a draft declaration of German-Arab cooperation, containing a clause:
Germany and Italy recognize the right of the Arab countries to solve the question of the Jewish elements, which exist in Palestine and in the other Arab countries, as required by the national and ethnic (völkisch) interests of the Arabs, and as the Jewish question was solved in Germany and Italy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Amin_al-Husayni#In_Nazi-occupied_Europe
He wanted to bring the Holocaust to Israel. The Jews were trying to stop the existing one.
Not even close to the same thing.
And as to the photos that I brought, they're real- regardless of whether or not you like the source.
I didn't write the Mufti was a myth idiot, I wrote that the insinuation that the Palestinians were cooperating with the Nazis was a myth. The reality is that the Jews were.
The myth of Zionist anti-Fascism
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/zionmyth2.htm
In 1941, Yitzhak Shamir committed "an unforgivable crime from the moral point of view: he preached an alliance with Hitler, with Nazi Germany, against Great Britain."
Source : Bar Zohar. "Le prophète armé -- : Ben Gourion." (Fayard. Paris 1966, p.99.)
When the war against Hitler began, almost all the Jewish organizations joined forces with the Allies and some of the most eminent leaders, such as Weizmann, declared themselves on the allied side; but the German Zionist group, though it was a small minority at the time, took the opposite side : from 1933 to 1941, it was committed to a policy of compromise and even of collaboration with Hitler. The Nazi authorities, even while they persecuted the Jews, for example by dismissing them from the Civil Service, kept contact with the Zionist leaders, granting them special treatment and distinguishing them from the "integrationist" Jews they were hunting down.
The accusation of collusion with the Hitlerian authorities does not therefore apply to the immense majority of Jews; these had not even waited until the war to fight Fascism with weapons, as they did in Spain from 1936 to 1939 as members of the International brigades, all the way to the Warsaw ghetto where the fighters of the "Jewish Committee" showed that they knew how to die in battle.
But the highly organized minority of Zionist leaders collaborated with the Nazis for eight years. Their one goal was to create a powerful Jewish State, while their racist vision of the world made them more anti-British than anti-Nazi.
* * *
On September 5th 1939, two days after the Anglo-French declaration of war on Germany, Chaim Weizmann, president of the Jewish Agency, wrote to the British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain. In his letter, he declared : "We Jews are on the side of Great Britain, and shall fight for democracy." He added that "the Jewish representatives are ready to sign an immediate agreement to allow the use of all their resources in men, techniques, material aid and all their capacities." This letter was printed in "The Jewish Chronicle" of September 8th, 1939 ; it was a genuine declaration of war on Germany by the Jewish people and raised the problem of internment of all Jews in Germany within concentration camps as "citizens of a nation at war with Germany."
* * *
In the days of Hitler and Mussolini, the Zionist leaders behaved in an ambivalent way with regards to Fascism, at times sabotaging the anti-Fascist struggle and even attempting to collaborate at others. The fundamental aim of the Zionists was not to save Jewish lives but to create a Jewish state in Palestine. Ben Gurion, Israel's first head of State, declared outright to the "Labor" Zionists on December 7th 1938 :
"If I knew it was possible to save all the children in Germany by taking them to England, and only half of the children by taking them to Eretz Israel, I would choose the second solution. For we must take into account not only the lives of these children but also the history of the people of Israel."
Source : Yvon Gelbner, "Zionist policy and the fate of European Jewry", in Yad Vashem studies (Jerusalem, vol. XII, p. 199).
"The saving of the Jews in Europe did not figure at the head of the list of priorities of the ruling class. It was the foundation of the State which was primordial in their eyes."
Source : Tom Segev. "Le septième million" Ed. Liana Levi, Paris, 1993, p. 539
(...) Must we help all those who need it without taking into account the characteristics of each one? Must we not give this action a national Zionist character and attempt to give priority to the saving of those who can be useful to the Land of Israel and to Judaism? I know it may seem cruel to pose the question in this way, but unfortunately we must establish clearly that if we are able to save 10,000 people out of the 50,000 people who can contribute to the construction of the land and to the national rebirth, or else a million Jews who will become a burden for us or at best a dead weight, we must restrict ourselves to the saving of the 10,000 who can be saved - despite the accusations and the appeals of the million left behind."
Source : Memorandum of the "Salvation Committee" of the Jewish Agency. 1943. Quoted by Tom Segev. Op. cit. p.124.
It was this fanaticism which inspired, for instance, the attitude of the Zionist delegation at the Evian conference of July 1938, where 31 nations had gathered to discuss the absorption of refugees from Nazi Germany : the Zionist delegation demanded, as the only possible solution, the admission of 200,000 Jews to Palestine.
The Jewish state was more important than the lives of Jews.
As far as the Zionist leaders were concerned, the worst enemy was "assimilation". In this they resembled the Hitlerians as do all racists, for whom the fundamental preoccupation is purity of blood. This is why the Hitlerians regarded the Zionists as valid interlocutors who served their designs, insofar as Hitler's ultimate goal was to rid Germany, and later Europe, of all Jews. We have proof of this collusion between Nazis and Zionists.
In a memorandum of June 21st 1933 to the Nazi party, the "Zionist Federation of Germany" expressed itself as follows :
"In the foundation of the new State, which has proclaimed the race principle, we wish to adapt our community to these new structures... Our recognition of the Jewish nationality allows us to establish clear and sincere relations with the German people and its national and racial realities. Precisely because we do not want to underestimate these fundamental principles, because we too are against mixed marriages and for the maintaining of the purity of the Jewish group...The Jews who are conscious of their identity and in whose name we speak, can find a place within the structure of the German State, for they are free of the resentment that the assimilated Jews must feel;...we believe in the possibility of loyal relations between those Jews conscious of their community and the German State.
To attain its practical objectives, Zionism hopes it will be able to collaborate with a government that is fundamentally hostile to the Jews....The realization of Zionism is impeded only by the resentment of Jews from without against the present German orientation The propaganda in favor of Zionism currently aimed against Germany is essentially non-Zionist... "
Source : Lucy Dawidovitch, "A Holocaust reader", p. 155.
The memorandum added that "should the Germans accept the cooperation of the Zionists, these would try to dissuade Jews abroad from supporting the anti-German boycott."
Source : Lucy Dawidovitch : "The war against Jews (1933-1945)" Penguin books. 1977. p.231-232
The Hitlerian leaders were well-disposed towards the Zionists, whose exclusive aim was to create a state in Palestine, thus favoring their own designs to get rid of the Jews. Alfred Rosenberg, the chief Nazi theoretician, wrote :
"Zionism must be vigorously backed so that a yearly contingent of German Jews shall be transported to Palestine."
Source : A. Rosenberg : "Die Spur des juden im Wandel der Zeiten". Munich 1937. p.153.
Reinhardt Heydrich, who was later to become "Protector" of Czechoslovakia, wrote in Das Schwarze Korps, the official organ of the S.S. in 1935, when he was head of the S.S. security. In an article entitled "The invisible enemy", he made a distinction between two kinds of Jews :
"We must separate the Jews into two categories, the Zionists and the partisans of assimilation. The Zionists profess a strictly racial concept and, through emigration to Palestine, they help to build their own Jewish State...our good wishes and our official goodwill go with them."
Source : Hohne. "Order of the Death's Head", p.333.
"The German Betar received a new name: Herzlia. The activities of the movement in Germany had to obtain, of course, the approval of the Gestapo; in fact, Herzlia acted under the protection of the Gestapo. One day, a group of SS attacked a Betar summer camp. The head of the movement then complained to the Gestapo and, a few days later, the secret police declared that the SS in question had been punished. The Gestapo asked the Betar what compensation would seem most adequate. The movement asked that the recent prohibition that had struck them, forbidding them to wear brown shirts, be lifted; their request was granted."
Source : Ben-Yeruham, "Le livre de Betar" T.II, p. 350.
A circular issued by the Wilhelmstrasse indicated :
"The goals that this category of Jews have set themselves (those Jews who oppose assimilation and favor a regrouping of their co-religionaries within a nation), with the Zionists in the front rank,are those least distant from the goals pursued in reality by Germany's policy towards the Jews."
Source : Circular letter by Bulow-Schwante to all the Reich diplomatic missions. #83. February 28, 1934.
"There is no reason," wrote Bulow-Schwante to the Ministry of the Interior,"to impede by administrative measures the Zionist activity in Germany ; for Zionism is not in conflict with the National-Socialist program, whose object is to make the Jews leave Germany progressively."
Source : Letter number ZU 83-21. 28/8, April 13, 1935.
These directives confirmed previous measures and were applied scrupulously. By virtue of the privileged status of Zionism in Germany, the Bavarian Gestapo addressed the following circular to the police on January 28,1935: "By reason of their activity orientated towards emigration to Palestine, the members of the Zionist organization must not be treated with the harshness needed in dealing with the members of German Jewish (assimilationist) organizations."
Source : Kurt Grossmann : "Sionistes et non sionistes sous la loi nazie dans les années 30" Yearbook.Vol.VI, p.310.
"The Zionist organization of German Jews had a legal existence until 1938, five years after the advent of Hitler....
The "Judaiche Rundschau" (the German Zionist newspaper) came out until 1938."
Source : Leibowitz : "Israel et Judaisme". Ed. Desclée de Brouwer, 1993. p.116.
In exchange for their official recognition as sole representatives of the Jewish community, the Zionist leaders offered to break the boycott which the world anti-Fascists were trying to organize.
Economic collaboration began in 1933 : two companies were created : the "Haavara Company" at Tel Aviv and the "Paltreu", in Berlin.
The mechanism of the operation was the following : a Jew wanting to emigrate would deposit a minimum of 1,000 pounds sterling at the Wasserman Bank in Berlin or in the Warburg bank in Hamburg. With this sum, Jewish exporters could buy German goods for Palestine, and pay the corresponding amount in Palestinian pounds into the Haavara account at the Anglo-Palestine Bank at Tel Aviv. When the immigrant arrived in Palestine, he received the equivalent of the sum he had deposited in Germany.
Several future Israeli prime ministers took part in the "haavara" undertaking, including Ben Gurion, Moshe Sharret (who was then called Moshe Shertok), Golda Meir (who supported it from New York), and Levi Eshkol, who was its representative in Berlin.
Source: "Ben Gourion et Shertok, dans Black": L'accord de la "havaara", p.294. Quoted by Tom Segev in "Le septieme million", (Ed. Liana Levi. French translation. 1993, p. 30 and 595).
The operation was advantageous for both parties : the Nazis thus succeeded in breaking the blockade (the Zionists managed to sell German merchandise even in Britain); whereas the Zionists were able to operate the "selective" immigration they desired : only millionaires were able to emigrate, their capital providing the funds needed to develop Zionist colonization in Palestine. In accordance with the goals of Zionism, it was more important to save Jewish capital from Nazi Germany that would permit the development of their undertaking, than to save the lives of poor Jews, unable to work or fight, who would have been a burden.
This policy of collaboration lasted until 1941, in other words eight years after Hitler's rise to power. Eichmann liaisoned with Kastner. The Eichmann trial revealed to some extent the mechanism of this connivance, of these "exchanges" between Zionist Jews "useful" to the creation of a Jewish State (wealthy personalities, technicians and youngsters who could serve to reinforce an army, etc.). with a mass of Jews who, being less favored, were left in Hitler's clutches.
The president of the committee, Ytzhak Gruenbaum, declared on January 18, 1943 :
"Zionism comes before everything else.."
"They're going to say I'm an anti-Semite," Gruenbaum answered, "that I don't want to save the Exile, that I don't have a Warm Yiddish heart (...) Let them say what they want. I won't demand the sum of 300,000 or 100,000 pounds sterling to help European Judaism. And I think that whoever demands such things accomplishes an anti-Zionist action."
Source : Gruenbaum: "Jours de destruction", p. 68.
This was also Ben Gourion's point of view:
"The Zionist's task is not to save the "rest" of Israel which finds itself in Europe, but to save the land of Israel for the Jewish people."
(Quoted by Tom Segev. op.cit.p.158.)
"The leaders of the Jewish Agency agreed on the fact that the minority which could be saved had to be chosen according to the needs of the Zionist project in Palestine."
Source: Idem p.125.
The conclusion of Isaiah Trunk's book : "Judenrat" (MacMillan, New York 1972) was that:
"According to Freudiger's calculations, fifty percent of the Jews could have escaped if they had not followed the instructions of the Jewish councils." (p.141)
Significantly, at the time of the 50 th anniversary of the uprising of the Warsaw ghetto, Yitzhak Rabin asked Lech Walesa not to let one of the co-leaders of the insurrection, Marek Edelman, make a speech.
In 1993, Marek Edelman had been interviewed by Edward Alter for the Israeli newspaper "Haaretz". In this interview, he recalled those who had been the true instigators and heroes of the Warsaw ghetto's "Jewish fighters' committee" :
"Socialists of the Bund, anti-Zionists, Communists, Trotskyites, Mihal Rosenfeld, Mala Zimetbaum, Edelman and a minority of Left-wing Zionists from the Poalei Zion and the Hashomer Hatzair."
"It was they who fought against the Nazis with weapons, as did the Jewish volunteers in the international brigades of Spain. Over 30% of the Americans in the Abraham Lincoln Brigade were Jews, who were attacked at the time by the Zionist press because they fought in Spain instead of going to Palestine."
Source : "Jewish Life", April 1938, p. 11.
2,250 of the fighters in the Polish Dombrovski brigade, out of a total of 5,000 Poles, were Jews.
These heroic Jews fought on all fronts side by side with the antiFascist forces of the world. And yet, the Zionist leaders declared in an article by their London representatives entitled : "Must Jews take part in the anti-Fascist movements?" "NO !...", setting a single goal : "the construction of the land of Israel".
In his autobiography, the President of the World Zionist Organization, Nahum Goldman, described his dramatic meeting with the Czech Prime Minister, Edward Benes, in 1935. Benes accused the Zionists of having broken the boycott of Hitler with the "Ha'avara" (the transfer agreements) and blamed the refusal of the world Zionist Organization to organize resistance against the Nazis.
"I have had to take part in many painful meetings in my life, but I have never felt as miserable and ashamed as during those two hours. I felt with every fibre of my being that Benes was right."
Source : Nahum Goldman."Autobiographie", op.cit. pp. 157- 158. Ibid, p.260.
The Zionists, counting on Mussolini's hostility to England, established contact with him as early as 1922. He had received them after his march on Rome in October, on December 20th 1922.
Source : Ruth Bondy, "The Emissary: a life of Enzo Sereni" (p.45).
Mussolini received Weizman on January 3rd 1923, and another time on September 17th 1926; Nahum Goldman, president of the World Zionist Organization, had a meeting with Mussolini on October 26th,1927, where the Italian leader told him : "I will help you to create this Jewish state." (Nahum Goldman : "Autobiographie", op.cit.p.170)
This collaboration was already a form of sabotage against the international anti-Fascist struggle. It subordinated the entire Zionist policy to the sole design of building a Jewish state in Palestine. Its design remained unaltered during the war, even when Hitler's persecution of European Jews was at its worst.
When the Jews were deported from Hungary, Rudolf Kastner, the vice-president of the Zionist organization, negotiated with Eichmann on the following basis : if Eichmann allowed the departure to Palestine of 1,684 "useful" Jews who would help in the construction of the future state of Israel (capitalists, technicians, soldiers, etc...) Kastner would allow Eichmann to make 460,000 Hungarian believe that they were not being deported to Auchwitz but simply being transferred.
At the time of the Eichmann trial, Judge Halevi recalled that Kastner had intervened on behalf of one of his Nazi interlocutors : one of Himmler's henchmen, Standarten feurher Kurt Becher, escaped punishment thanks to Kastner's testimony at the Nuremberg Trial.
The Judge was formal :
"There was no truth or good faith in Kastner's testimony...Kastner deliberately committed perjury in his testimony before this court when he denied that he had intervened on behalf of Becher. Furthermore, he concealed this vital fact : his action on behalf of Becher was made in the name of the Jewish Agency and the World Jewish Congress...It is clear that Kastner's recommendation was not made on a personal basis but also in the name of the Jewish Agency and the World Jewish Congress...and this is why Becher was released by the Allies."
After the verdict, Israeli opinion was shaken. In the newspaper "Haaretz", Dr. Moshe Keren wrote on July 14th 1955 :"Kastner must be tried for collaboration with the Nazis..." But the evening paper "Yediot Aharonot" (23rd June,1955) clearly explained why this was impossible. "If Kastner is tried, the entire government might collapse before the nation, following what this trial will uncover."
What would be discovered was that Kastner had not acted alone but with the agreement of the other Zionist leaders who were members of the government at the time of the trial. The only way to prevent Kastner from talking and causing a scandal was for him to disappear. And indeed, he died at just the right moment, after which the Israeli Government introduced an appeal to rehabilitate him. The Supreme Court granted the appeal.
This policy of collaboration reached its apogee in 1941, when the most extremist Zionist group, the "LEHI" ("Fighters for the Liberation of Israel"), led by Abraham Stern and, after his death, by a triumvirate of which Itzak Shamir was a member, committed " an unforgivable crime from the moral point of view : advocating an alliance with Hitler, with Nazi Germany, against Great Britain."
Source : Bar Zohar. "Ben Gourion, le Prophète armé" (Fayard. Paris 1966. p.99)
Eliezer Halevi, a well-known Labor unionist, member of the Gueva Kibbutz, revealed in the weekly "Tel-Aviv Hotam" (August l9th, 1983) the existence of a document signed by Itzak Shamir (who was then called Yezernitsky) and by Abraham Stern; this document was handed over to the German embassy in Ankara at a time of all-out war in Europe, and when Marshal Rommel's troops were already on Egyptian soil. The document said, among other things, "In the matter of concept, we identify with you. So why not collaborate with one another ?" In its issue of January 31st,1983, "Haaretz" quotes a letter marked "secret", sent in January 1941 by Hitler's ambassador to Ankara, Franz Von Papen, to his superiors. In it, he described his contacts with the members of the Stern Gang, joining a memorandum by the Nazi secret service agent in Damas, Werner Otto Von Hentig, regarding the negotiations with the envoys of Stern and Shamir. The memo said, notably : "cooperation between the Israel liberation movement and the new order in Europe conform with one of the speeches of the Chancellor of the Third Reich, in which Hitler stressed the need to use every combination of coalition to isolate and defeat England." It also said that the Stern Gang had "close links with the totalitarian movements in Europe, their ideology and structures." These documents are to be found at the Holocaust Memorial (Yad Vachem) in Jerusalem, classified under the number E234151-8.
One of the historical leaders of the Stern Gang, Israel Eldad, published an article in the Tel Aviv daily,"Yediot Aharonot" (February 4th, 1983) in which he confirmed the authenticity of these negotiations between his movement and the official representatives of Nazi Germany. He asserted straight out that his colleagues had explained to the Nazis how there was a probable identity of interest between the new order in Europe based on the German concept, and the aspirations of the Jewish people in Palestine, as represented by the Stern freedom fighters for Israel.
This text was entitled :
"Basic principles of the military organization(NMO) in Palestine (Irgun Zevai Leumi) concerning the solution of the Jewish question in Europe and the active participation of the NMO in the war on the side of Germany."
The following are extracts :
It emerges from the speeches of the leaders of the German National Socialist State that a radical solution to the Jewish question implies an evacuation of the Jewish masses from Europe. (Judenreines Europa).
This evacuation of the Jewish masses from Europe is the primary condition of the solution of the Jewish problem, but it is only made possible by the installation of these masses in Palestine, in a Jewish state with its historical frontiers.
To resolve the Jewish problem definitively and to liberate the Jewish people is the goal of the political activity and the long years of struggle of the "Movement for the Freedom of Israel" (Lehi) and its national military organization in Palestine (Irgun Zevai Leumi).
The NMO, knowing the benevolent position of the Reich government towards the Zionist activity within Germany, and the Zionist emigration projects, considers that:
1) There could exist common interests between the foundation of a new order in Europe, according to the German concept, and the genuine aspirations of the Jewish people as they are incarnated by the Lehi.
2) Cooperation would be possible between the new Germany and a renewed Hebrew nation (Volkish Nationalen Hebraertum).
3) The establishment of the historical Jewish State on a national and totalitarian base, linked by a treaty to a German Reich, could contribute to the reinforcement in the future of Germany's position in the Middle East.
On condition that the German government recognizes the national aspirations of the 'Movement for the Freedom of Israel' (Lehi), the National Military Organization (NMO) proposes to participate in the war on the side of Germany.
The cooperation of the Israel liberation movement would go in the direction of the recent speeches of the Reich chancellor, in which Mr. Hitler stressed that all negotiations and any alliance should serve to isolate England and to defeat it.
Because of its structure and concept of the world, the NMO is narrowly linked to the European totalitarian movements.
Source : The original text, in German, is to be found as appendix number 11 of the book by David Yisraeli : "Le probleme palestinien dans la politique allemande, de 1889 " 1945", Bar Ilan University Ramat Gan. Israel, 1974,p. 315-317.
According to the Israeli press, which has published a dozen articles on the subject, the Nazis never took the proposals of Stern, Shamir and their friends seriously.
The negotiations stopped abruptly when the Allied troops arrested the emissary of Stern and Shamir in June 1941. The emissary, Naftali Loubentchik, was actually arrested in the Nazi secret service office at Damascus. Other members of the group continued to have contacts with the Nazis until the arrest by the British authorities of Izhak Shamir in December 1941 for "terrorism and collaboration with the Nazi enemy."
Such a past did not prevent Izhak Shamir from becoming Prime Minister, and from still being today the leader of a powerful "opposition", the most fiercely determined to continue the occupation of Cisjordania. This is because, in fact, the Zionist leaders all pursue the same racist goal, notwithstanding their internal rivalries : to chase all the native Arabs out of Palestine through terror, expropriation or expulsion, in order to remain the sole conquerors and masters.
Ben Gurion once declared :
"Begin undeniably belongs to the Hitlerian type. He is a racist, ready to destroy all the Arabs in his dream of unification of Israel, prepared to resort to any means to realize this sacred goal."
Source : E.Haber. "Menahem Begin, the man and the legend." Delle Book. New York 1979, p. 385.
The same Ben Gurion never believed in the possibility of coexistence with the Arabs. The fewer Arabs there were within the borders of of the future state of Israel, the better it would be. He did not say so explicitly, but the overall impression one gets from his speeches and his comments is clear: a major offensive against the Arabs would not only defeat their attacks but would also reduce as far as possible the percentage of the Arab population within the State.
"(...) He can be accused of racism, but then one will have to put on trial the entire Zionist movement, which is founded on the principle of a purely Jewish entity in Palestine."
Source : Bar Zohar (op.cit) p.146.
At the Eichmann trial in Jerusalem, the Attorney General, Haim Cohen, reminded the judges:
"If it does not coincide with your philosophy, you can criticize Kastner...But what does that have to do with collaboration?...It has always been in our Zionist tradition to select an elite to organize immigration to Palestine... Kastner did nothing else."
Source : Court record 124/53. Jerusalem district court.
This prominent magistrate was indeed evoking a constant doctrine of the Zionist movement : its goal was not to save Jews but to build a strong Jewish state.
Rabbi Klaussner, who was in charge of "Displaced persons," presented a report before the Jewish American Conference on May 2nd, 1948 :
"I am convinced people must be forced to go to Palestine....For them, an American dollar appears as the highest of goals. By the word "force", I am suggesting a programme. It served for the evacuation of the Jews in Poland, and in the history of the 'Exodus'... To apply this programme we must, instead of providing 'displaced persons' with comfort, create the greatest possible discomfort for them...At a second stage, a procedure calling upon the Haganah to harass the Jews."
Source : Alfred H.Lilienthal in "What price Israel", Chicago 1953.p.194-195.
There were several variations on this method of inducement and even of coercion.
In 1940, to arouse indignation against the English, who had decided to save the Jews threatened by Hitler by taking them to Mauritius, the Zionist leaders of the "Hagannah" (led by Ben Gurion) did not hesitate to blow up the ship when it called at Haifa on December 25th 1940, causing the death of 252 Jews and English crew-members.
Source : Dr.Herzl Rosenblum, director of "Yediot Aahronot", revelation made in 1958 and justified in "Jewish Newsletter", N.Y.,November 1958.
Another example was that of Irak :
Its Jewish community (110,000 people in 1948) was well-implanted in the country. The chief Rabbi of Irak, Khedouri Sassoon had declared :
"The Jews and Arabs have enjoyed the same rights and privileges for a thousand years and do not consider themselves as separate elements in this nation."
Then began the Israeli terrorist acts in Baghdad in 1950. Confronted by the reticence of the Iraki Jews to register on the immigration lists for Israel, the Israeli secret services did not hesitate to throw bombs at them to convince them they were in danger...The attack on the Shem-Tov synagogue killed three people and injured dozens more. It was the start of the exodus baptized "Operation Ali Baba".
Source : Ha'olam hazeh. April 20th and June 1st 1966, and "Yediot Aahronot", November 8th 1977.
This has been a consistent doctrine ever since Theodore Herzl replaced the definition of Jew no longer as a religion but as a race.
Article 4b of the fundamental law of the State of Israel (which has no constitution),which defines the "Law of the return" (5710 of 1950), stipulates that:
...will be considered as Jewish a person born of a Jewish mother, or converted. (racial or confessional criteria)
Source : Klein : "L'Etat juif", ed. Dunod.Paris.p.156.
This was in keeping with the founding doctrine of Theodore Herzl, who constantly harped on the theme in his "Diaries". As early as 1895, he declared to a German interlocutor (Speidel) :
"I understand anti-Semitism. We Jews have remained, even if it is not our fault, foreign bodies in the different nations."
Source : ("Diaries", p.9)
A few pages further, he is even more explicit :
"Anti-Semites will become our surest friends, anti-Semitic countries our allies."
Source : ("Diaries", p.19)
They did indeed have a common goal : to assemble Jews in a world ghetto.
The facts have borne out Theodore Herzl's arguments.
Pious Jews, like many Christians, repeated each day : "Next year, Jerusalem, " making of Jerusalem not a specific territory but the symbol of the Alliance between God and Men, and the personal effort to deserve it, so that the "Return" occurred only under the impulse of anti-Semitic threats in foreign countries.
On August 31st 1949, Ben Gurion declared to a group of American visitors to Israel :
"Although we have realized our dream of creating a Jewish State, we are only at the beginning. There are still only 900,000 Jews in Israel, whereas the majority of the Jewish people still remains abroad. Our future task is to bring all the Jews to Israel."
Ben Gurion's goal was to bring four million Jews to Israel between 1951 and 1961. 800,000 came. In 1960, there were only 30,000 immigrants for the year. In 1975-76, emigration out of Israel outstripped immigration.
Only the great persecutions, such as that in Romania, had given a certain impulse to the Return. Even the Hitlerian atrocities did not succeed in fulfilling Ben Gurion's dream.
Out of the two and a half million Jewish victims of the Nazis which sought refuge abroad between 1935 and 1943, hardly 8,5% went to settle in Palestine. The United States limited their number to 182,000 allowed to enter US soil (less than 7%); England limited the number to 67,000 (less than 2%). The vast majority (1,930,000), in other words 75% found shelter in the Soviet Union.
Source : Institute for Jewish Affairs of New York, quoted by Christopher Sykes in "Crossroads to Israel", London 1965, and by Nathan Weinstock, "Le sionisme contre Israel," p.146.
This is from the British Ex-Services Association highlighting early Jewish terrorism in Palestine
TERROR IN PALESTINE
http://www.nesa.org.uk/latest_issue/nov-dec-07.htm
Gary Cartwright revisits the campaign of terror and murder
in which British servicemen were the ‘target of choice’.
I loathe clichés. However the old one about one man’s terrorist being another man’s freedom fighter has a certain truth to it. Too often the freedom fighter’ is perceived that way as a result of romanticism or naiveté, such as in the case of the fool’s pin-up’ Che Guevara. Sometimes the passage of time blurs perception, particularly when for reasons of what we now call ~political correctness’ there is an unwillingness to accept and to address the facts. Into this latter category falls the campaign of terror organised by Abraham Stern, Yitzhak Shamir, Menachem Begin, and others, in the British protectorate of Palestine.
The Jewish population in Palestine.
There is a common misconception that it was only after the Second World War that the Jewish population of Palestine surged, with the mass immigration of refugees from war torn Europe. And that this, coupled with attempts by the British to stem the tide, which lead to a campaign by Zionists for independence. This is not so, and to trace the roots of the Zionist campaign one has to look back to the early 20th century.
In 1918 there were some 50,000 Jews in Palestine, a figure that was steadily growing to the point that it had doubled by 1925. As early as 1921, the Palestinian Arabs lobbied Britain for a representative government in order to give them the power to veto any further immigration. Sensing growing unrest amongst the Arabs, and against a backdrop of street riots in 1921/22, British High Commissioner Sir Herbert Samuel ordered the Suspension, Of Jewish immigration although immediately tensions cooled, it was quietly resumed. Prior to this unrest, in 1920, the ‘Haganah’, an illegal Jewish Para-military body was formed in the protectorate.
Immigration surged in 1933 with the rise to power in Germany of Adolf Hitler. Between 1933-36 the Jewish population rose from 230.000 to 400,000. On April 15th 1936 the Arabs declared a general strike, which quickly became a full-blown rebellion. It took the British authorities until October10 restore order, by which time 138 Arabs, 80 Jews, and 33 British soldiers had been killed. British attempts to resolve the problem became increasingly desperate. In 1937 a Royal Commission announced a plan to divide the mandate into two states: Galilee and the Coastal plain were to be Jewish, whilst Gaza, Sameria, South Judea and the Negev desert were to be run by the Arabs. Ever protective of their political power and commercial interests, the British would retain control of Jerusalem, Bethlehem, Jaffa, and Lod. The Jews agreed to this plan, seeing for themselves a foothold. But the Arabs did not. They realised that any concession to the Zionist lobby would quickly be followed by further demands and intimidation. The plan was never implemented. It was also in 1937 that Vladimir ‘Zeev’ Jabotinsky, a Zionist and a communist, formed the irgun Zvai Leumi’ (National Military Organisation). Jabotinsky and the Irgun.
Jabotinsky. Born in Odessa in 1880, and a journalist and writer of some merit, had contrived to join the British Army in the closing months of the First World War, (to what end is uncertain,) and fought alongside General Allenby’s troops. With Avraham Tehorni, Jabotinsky formed the lrgun from militant members of Haganah. lrgun’s stated aims were to force the British out of Palestine, to defeat the Arabs politically, to bring in I million Jewish settlers a year, and to colonise both banks of the River Jordan.
The Stern Gang
Following the death of Jabotinsky in 1940, (he suffered a heart attack whilst fund-raising amongst the Jewish community in New York) leadership of the Irgun fell to a recently arrived Polish immigrant, Menachim Begin. At the same time, the movement split, with a particularly vicious element breaking away under Abraham Stern and becoming known as the notorious ~Stern Gang’. The Stern Gang believed that there must be no restriction placed on Zionist expansion whatsoever, and immediately set about trying to force a change of policy by assassinating British officers. Such was Abraham Stern’s hatred of the British that he regarded Britain a greater enemy than Hitler, and opposed Jews joining in the fight against Nazism. A bizarre sentiment, but one, which gives an interesting and informative insight into Stern’s ideology. Indeed, in September 1940, the Stern gang entered into negotiations with Mussolini, through an emissary, and in January 1941 Stern personally dispatched an agent to Vichy controlled Beirut to deliver a letter to Reich officials. It was also in the Stern Gang that future Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir rose to prominence, when he took control of the terror group on Stern’s death. Stern’s political extremism, attempted links with the Nazis, a string of armed robberies had earned him the contempt of most decent Jews. The British intensified their hunt for him, and tracked him down to a hideaway in Tel Aviv on Feb 12th, 1942, where he was immediately shot. There is a Hebrew word — MEKHABBEL — which describes someone who fights the state with political violence. In other words, a terrorist. Stern, Shamir and their comrades wore this badge with great pride.
AIraflam Stern. Terrorist, murderer, armed robber.
It seems that the terrorists were not above murdering their own in order to further their aims. In November 1940, Haganah placed explosives in the hold of the 55 Patria in Haifa harbour. In the resulting catastrophe, 270 immigrants perished. In 1942, Zionists used explosives to sink the SS Struma in the Black sea. On the latter occasion 769 men, women. and children lost their lives. Both atrocities were blamed on British enforcement of immigration quotas.
The Terror begins in earnest.
The evolution of Zionist nationalism had now led to a point where the radicals where calling the shots. And so, the killing began. In November 1942, Stern gang murderers Eliyahu Hakim and EliyahLl Beit-Tzur travelled to Cairo and assassinated Lord Moyne, the British colonial Secretary of State for Palestine. (Both were caught and hanged by the British. Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir. A Stern Gang member himself, of course, had their remains returned to Israel in 1975 for ‘heroes’ burials. Subsequently, streets in Israel were named in ‘honour’ of these terrorists and murderers.)
As so often happens, as the campaign intensified it became the soldiers and policemen on the ground who became casualties more often than not. The following list is by no means exhaustive, but illustrates the nature of the campaign of terror and murder instigated in the name of Zionism.
14 Feb 1944. Two British policemen fatally wounded.
2 March 1944. British Police Constable shot.
23 March 1944. Chief clerk and two constables murdered at Tel Aviv district HQ. Threepolice constables murdered in the bombing of the police HQ at Haifa. One British policesuperintendent murdered in Jerusalem.
8 August 1944. During the attempted assassination of the British High Commissioner,Ten British policemen were murdered.
29 August 1944. Senior police official assassinated on his way to work.
29 Sept 1944. Assistant police superintendent murdered.
25 April 1946 Seven British soldiers murdered in their sleep in Tel Aviv.
22 July 1946 King David Hotel, housing the offices of the Secretariat of the PalestinianGovernment as well as British Army HQ was bombed, allegedly with the connivance ofDavid Ben-Gurion’s ‘Jewish Agency’. 91 Dead.
13 Nov 1946. Two British policemen murdered in bombing attacks.
18 Nov 1946. Five British soldiers murdered in bomb attacks.
21 Nov 1946. British government offices bombed. Nine casualties.
2 Dec 1946. Four British soldiers murdered in a mine blast.Christmas 1946. Police HQ bombed. Six dead.
26 Dec 1946. Four British citizens abducted and flogged.
29 Dec 1946. Three British soldiers abducted and flogged.
12 Jan. 1947. Two British policemen murdered in bomb attack.
I March 1947. Officers club in Jerusalem bombed, and other terrorist attacks resultingin 18 dead and 85 injured.
18 April 1947. British military hospital in Nathania attacked. One dead.
20 April 1947. A number of British soldiers injured in the bombing of a Red Crossdepot.
22 April 1947. Attack on a train bound for Haifa. Five Soldiers murdered, twenty-threeinjured.
26 April 1947. British policeman murdered in Haifa.
9 June 1947. Two British policemen abducted and flogged.
31 July 1947. British Sergeants Paice and Martin found hanged. Their bodies mutilatedand booby-trapped.
August 1947. Three British policemen murdered.
26 Sept 1947. Four British policemen murdered.
29 Sept 1947. Nine British policemen and four civilians murdered in Haifa.
Jan 1948. One soldier murdered and four injured.
Feb 1948. Twenty-seven British soldiers and airmen murdered, and thirty-fiveinjured in an attack on a train at Rehovath.
23 Feb 1948.Two British policemen shot in their sickbeds at Wallach hospital, andone policeman murdered in another attack in Jerusalem.
King David Hotel: 91 killed in terrorist outrage. [ Menachim Begin & his Irgun terror group admitted responsibility for the bombing.]
Official sanction.
That this terror campaign was at least sanctioned by the Jewish Agency, the official representative body of the Palestinian Jews, is beyond question. The collusion between the agency and the Stern Gang was confirmed in the British Colonial Office White Paper on Palestine (cmd.6873). The Chairman of the Jewish Agency at the time was David Ben- Gurion, who was later to become the first Prime Minister of Israel. Indeed, it has been alleged that Ben-Gurion himself approved the bombing of the King David Hotel. Shamir and Begin never attempted to hide their past as ‘freedom fighters’, basking in the glory of the campaign to rid Palestine of the hated British.
When the Union flag was lowered for the last time at Government House in Jerusalem on May l4”~. 1948, Ben-Gurion became Prime Minister.
Just week’s prior to this event, however, the lrgun and the Stern Gang turned their attention to new targets with a vengeance. On 10th April 1948 the people of Nasr el Din were massacred. On May 5t11, it was the turn of men, women, and children from the village of Khoury. The very day before the British mandate ended, the villagers of Beit Drass were slaughtered.
At the village of Deir Yassin, the Irgun murdered 250 Arabs in an unprecedented orgy of barbarity. Britain’s Secretary of State for the Colonies, speaking in the Commons on April 12th, 1948, stated, “This barbarous aggression was a proof of savagery. It was a crime that added to a long list of atrocities committed by the Zionists to this day, and for which we can find sufficient words of revulsion...
Towards the end of 1948, the Stern Gang assassinated the United Nations mediator for Palestine, Count Folke Bernadette. His ‘crime’ being concern for the Palestinian Arabs.
Infamy and treachery.
It should be borne in mind that both the lrgun and Stern Gang included Britons amongst their numbers. Some, allegedly, had fought as part of the communist ‘International Brigade’ during the Spanish Civil War. Others, shamefully, were former British soldiers who were turning their weapons on their former comrades. It should also be remembered that many of these murderous acts against British servicemen were being carried out at the same time as the British army was liberating concentration camps in Hitler’s Europe.
Throughout this campaign of terror can be witnessed the hands of men who were to become senior Israeli figures, and indeed national heroes. Another figure who made his name as ‘The Butcher of Beirut’ long after the British withdrawal was Ariel Sharon, who also went on to become Israeli Prime Minister. It seems the lineage continues, a fact that does not bode well for today’s Palestinians, or for any chance of peace in a part of the world that has known too much suffering and bloodshed over the centuries.
Now what YOU posted was spam. And biblebelievers.org is a Neo-Nazi web site.
How fitting.
Oh right- about Deir Yassin?
IT WAS ONE MORE ARAB LIE, AS THESE ARAB PARTICIPANTS AND EYEWITNESSES NOW ADMIT 50 YEARS LATER
In retrospect, Palestinians of today admit that one of the most terrible mistakes they made back in 1948 was to over-report the details of the Deir Yassin massacre. "The goal was to mobilize Arab support for the Palestinians who were slaughtered by the Zionists but what really happened was that more and more Palestinians became scared and left their country," said Hazem Nusseibeh, a leading Palestinian figure who currently lives in Jordan. In 1948 he was among the key figures of the city of Jerusalem.
..."True, there was exchange of fire with the Jews. Prior to the attack, they used to come to the village and distribute leaflets calling for the establishment of friendly and brotherly relations with us offering a formula of 'do not hit us, we won't hit you.' Our youths confronted them and did not listen to them. Our youths used to go out to the eastern side of the village and beat up whatever Jew they saw."
...Mohammed Asaad Radwan Al Yassini, 70, who currently lives in the Old City of Jerusalem, confirmed that some of the men were dressed in women's outfits.
...Did they use speakers and what did they say?
"They called on us to surrender, to throw our weapons and to save ourselves. But we did not imagine them breaking into the village.
...Ali Yousef Jaber, Abu Yousef, is also 70 years old. He lives in Am'ari refugee camp near Ramallah. Excerpts below:
"I would like to stress on the fact that no rape incidents took place. That was part of a big lie that some of the Arabs and some of our leaders invented but were refuted by our villagers. I was among a group of people who went to Saad Eddin Al Aref to talk to him about this. He told us he wanted to frame them and attribute to them a brutal crime. I said to him: if you want to frame them, do not use Deir Yassin, or our women. Do not attribute to us something that never happened, otherwise this is infamy that our village and its people do not deserve...
This, the most ridiculous lie I,ve ever heared
Those Histry re-writers -self-slanderers don,t know when to stop
Post a Comment