Monday, 19 April 2010

All the way, from the Ukrain to Jerusalem

All the way, from the Ukrain to Jerusalem

http://palestinianvoice.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/01.jpg
he should have stayed home.....in Ukraine

Jerusalem......
the city of Peace
the most Holy place for all religions
where all the prophets once have passed.

Whether you are religious or not
this city has a mythical value
and spiritual attraction.

Nothing is new , in what I write now.

But ,
lately we hear and see about a huge corruption scandal
involving Ehud Olmert when he was the Mayor there.


And I ask myself ,
why would that Ukrainian-crook
pretend to be Semite, pretend to be from Abraham's house
and then move to steal Palestine... including Jerusalem
and then become the Mayor in that city
only so that he can ,some day, collect the bribes
from a US-Jew-Millionaire..........??


The answer is obvious :
because Olmert is a crook and a Zionist
( although one of those 2, is a sufficient crime )


If Olmert would have stayed in Ukraine
he could have also become a Mayor
and also could have collected  bribes.
I am sure many millionaires , jews ,christians or muslems,
would have bought  Mr. Olmert , in Ukraine , as well.

Therefore,
becoming a Zionist and then stealing Palestine
would have being absolutely not necessary for Olmert nor for  a million-crooks like him, too.


Sherlock Hommosanti-fraud-brigade
Posted by Тлакскала at 4:12 PM
River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

Prejudices

Prejudices
http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/4465/rabbisgearresteet.jpghttp://mantiqaltayr.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/amd_rabbi-rosenbaum.jpg
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/08_02/muslimDM1608_468x420.jpg
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/october/romanchurch_obscenechildren.jpg
http://www.axelhotels.com/live/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Gay+Marriages+Begin+California+CBea0_rJdq7l.jpg
many variations... !!
but many generalisations



Some prejudices
:
We cannot and
should not generalise
nor can we stereotype the people,
otherwise one could say :

Muslims-imams are terrorists
Catholics-priests are paedophiles
Protestants-pastors are gay-promoters  

Jewish-rabbis sell body-parts,
cut and polish the " blood-diamonds"
and
steel even a whole country !!

 

Raja Chemayela protestant-terrorist-anti-paedophile
Posted by Тлакскала at 4:10 PM
River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

Rallies Mark Palestinian Prisoners Day; Detainee Dies in Israeli Jail

Hanan Awarekeh

17/04/2010 At a time the international community seems to be "concerned" for one Israeli occupation soldier captured by Palestinian resistance factions, none of the Western governments bothers itself to talk about the thousands of Palestinians detained in the Israeli occupation jails.

A total of more than 760,000 Palestinians, including many minors and women, have been detained since Israel seized the West Bank along with other Arab territories in the 1967 Middle East war; however the World seems to be in a coma when the issue is related to the Palestinians.

On Saturday, Palestinians held rallies and vigils in an annual day of support for the thousands of Palestinians held in Israeli occupation prisons, a day after a detainee died in custody.

In the occupied West Bank town of Ramallah, people marched through the town centre, carrying pictures of imprisoned relatives or of Marwan Barghouti, a jailed leader of the mainstream Fatah party.

Barghouti, architect of the 2000 uprising (Intifada) against Israeli occupation, is serving five life terms but remains popular and is often spoken of as a successor to Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas. "We shall not rest until the prisoners issue is resolved," prisoners' affairs minister Issa Qaraqae told the crowd in Ramallah.

In occupied Jerusalem, relatives held pictures of their jailed loved ones at the entrance to the walled Old City, while in Gaza, foreign activists joined locals in a sit-in outside local offices of the Red Cross.

Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyyeh called on Palestinians to fight Israeli occupation "by any means" to put pressure on Israel to free the detainees.

Saber Abu Karsh, head of the Wa'ed Prisoners Society, said "all Palestinian factions are united in solidarity with the detainees and, in support of their cause, join their hunger strike inside the Israeli jails."

Nash'et Al-Wheidi, member of the Popular Movement to Support Prisoners, said "this tent was erected to support the prisoners in Israeli jails and to demand an end to the division that has harmed the prisoners' cause."

Last week, Qaraqe said the Israeli Prison Service (IPS) has applied punitive measures to 36 Palestinian female prisoners in the Ad-Damun prison in response to the general hunger strike that began on April 7.

Qaraqe said the IPS has reduced the detainees' recess to one hour per day, prohibited them from sending letters to their family, and further enforced restricted access to the cantina, where detainees can buy stationary and other goods, because of their participation.

Moreover, the minister said the prison administration transferred a number of detainees from the Nafha prison to Ber Sheva prison in response to the hunger strike.

Detainees said they would escalate their protest if the IPS did not respond to their protests against humiliating treatment of relatives visiting detainees and banning Gaza detainees from family visitation rights for over four years.

Meanwhile, the Palestinian Authority called on Israel to investigate the death of a Palestinian detainee in a jail in the southern occupied territories.

Qaraqi said 26 year-old Raed Abu Hammad died on Friday in solitary confinement.

An Israeli Prison Service spokesman said Hammad was found dead on the floor of his cell. Hammad was suffering from medical conditions and the Prison Service was checking the cause of his death, the spokesman said.

"We are demanding an investigation and to perform an autopsy to find out why he died," Qaraqi said. "Israel is fully responsible for the death of the prisoner because he was sick and Israel and the doctors in the prison authority knew that."

Former detainee Abed An-Naser Farawneh said Hamad’s death came as a result of "intentional medical negligence," and noted that Hammad was the 198th Palestinian to die in Israeli custody since the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza in 1967.

Hammad was a member of the Hamas party, and was serving a prison term following his conviction in an Israeli military court on charges of attempting an attack on Israeli civilians.

More than 7,000 Palestinians, including 270 under the age of 18, are currently being held in Israeli prisons, according to data released by the Palestinian central bureau of statistics.

Three of the prisoners have been in jail for more than 30 years, and 315 for more than 15 years, the office said in a statement released on the eve of the Prisoners' Day.

Of those held, 264 are under administrative detention, meaning they are being detained without trial.

River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

The Jenin Refugee Camp Massacre of 2002: 'Horrific beyond Belief'



Hanan Awarekeh
Readers Number : 641


13/04/2010 “They were warned by loudspeaker to get out of the house before I come, BUT I GAVE NO ONE A CHANCE. I didn’t wait. I didn’t give one blow, and wait for them to come out. I would just ram the house with full power, to bring it down as fast as possible. I wanted to get to the other houses. To get as many as possible, I didn’t give a damn about the Palestinians, but I didn’t just ruin with no reason. It was all under orders.”

Fortified by an arsenal of alcohol, Israeli occupation army bulldozer driver Moshe Nissim did enjoy his work by killing hundreds of Palestinian children, women and unarmed men in the jenin camp. First published in the Israeli daily Yediot Ahronot and since reprinted on the website of the Israeli peace group Gush Shalom, his testimony gives a version of the barbarian and inhumane massacre that took place on April 13, 2002.

“I found joy with every house that came down, because I knew they didn’t mind dying, but they cared for their homes. If you knocked down a house, you buried 40 or 50 people for generations. If I am sorry for anything, it is for not tearing the whole camp down,” he says.


Nissim’s army unit received a military commendation for its efforts in killing Palestinians in jenin.

During the month of March 2002, Israel launched its ''Operation Defensive Shield'' with incursions into the seven main Palestinian towns. In each incursion, Israeli troops, tanks and armored vehicles entered the cities and imposed a curfew on their civilian population.

On the 3rd of April 2002 Israeli occupation forces surrounded jenin city and its refugee camp, controlled all the access roads into and out the city and imposed a curfew while declaring the area as a ''closed military area”.

jenin camp, established in 1953, is one of 22 refugee camps in the West Bank; it was the second largest refugee camp in the West Bank comprising a population of about 14000 people.

Israeli forces attacked the camp using bulldozers, tanks, and apache helicopters. Serious damage was done to the water, sewage and electrical infrastructure of the camp; moreover the occupation soldiers prevented ambulances and the medical teams from entering the camp. This operation continued for about 13 days. Many civilians were killed, many buildings were destroyed which housed several families, and, in some cases, some of these buildings had people inside. Many families were left homeless. And Israeli soldiers arrested some of the camp residents.

The exact toll of the dead may never be known as many corps may still be lying under the rubble. Moreover, witnesses mentioned stories of the death of a group of people who where gathering inside their homes. Initial estimates were hundreds of children, women, and men.

Israeli officials tried to justify this deplorable behavior against a civilian population by claiming there were about 200-armed men from (Tanzeem) Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades hiding inside the camp. However, the Israeli occupation army didn't take steps to avoid injury to civilians; moreover they used some of them as human shields.

Till now the Israeli government still refuses to acknowledge that what happened in jenin is a Massacre. An independent forensic expert says evidence suggests that a massacre has taken place. And the inhabitants of the camp know too well what those 13 days were; they didn't need a fact-finding mission to tell them.

Moreover, Israeli occupation forces had evacuated many other corpses and buried them in the occupied territories (in the numbered "enemy" cemetery) in an attempt to hide the actual number of victims in the refugee camp.

The UN Security Council formed a Committee to investigate the massacre but the Israeli government refused to cooperate with the Committee. Upon that Israeli rejection of cooperation, then UN Secretary-General, Kofi Anan, dissolved the Committee before starting its work. Thus, the Israeli war criminals are still free to commit more war crimes, atrocities, and human rights violations against the Palestinian people, without being held accountable for their actions.

Media sources in the Middle East and Europe, and to a lesser extent elsewhere in the world, had a field day. Headlines screamed "Massacre", "War Crimes", "Atrocities", "Genocide" and worse.

Nasser al-Kidwa, the Palestinian representative to the United Nations, described on CNN Channel what was happening, he said “There's almost a massacre now taking place in jenin. Helicopter gun ships are throwing missiles at one square kilometer packed with almost 15,000 people in a refugee camp. . . . Just look at the TV and watch, watch what the -what the Israel forces are doing. . . . This is a war crime, clear war crime, witnessed by the whole world, preventing ambulances, preventing people from being buried. I mean this is an all-out assault against the whole population.”

A United Nations envoy has said that the devastation left by Israeli forces in jenin is "horrific beyond belief".

Terje Roed-Larsen, who was the UN's Special Coordinator for the occupied Palestinian territories, had visited the camp with Red Cross and UN workers. He toured the jenin refugee camp, and said it was "morally repugnant" that Israel had not allowed emergency workers in for 11 days to provide humanitarian relief.

Roed-Larsen said the top priority was to bring in search-and-rescue teams. The only rescue efforts which were under way were residents digging though the ruins looking for survivors. "It is totally destroyed, it looks like an earthquake has hit it," he said. "We have expert people here who have been in war zones and earthquakes and they say they have never seen anything like it," he added.

While the rubble had been cleared from the jenin camp, and the bodies buried, most Palestinians felt that the stories they told have been too hastily swept aside.

Four months after the fact, the UN did produce a report on the conduct of the Israeli army. Based on secondary sources and internet research, it did not however provide a judgment as much as a venue for Israel and the Palestinians to air their opposing versions of events.

“Inevitably the report falls short of a comprehensive inquiry. We found that the report was not satisfactory because it did not address the issues in the depth they deserved,” says Donatella Rovera of HRW.

“There has to be an investigation, and those responsible must be brought to justice. The duty to investigate lies with the Israeli government. The responsibility for this, failing the Israeli authorities, lies with the international community.”

That a follow-up never materialized surprised a few. “This is in keeping with the behavior of the Israeli authorities both before and after the invasion,” continues Rovera.

REMEMBERING THE DEIR YASSIN MASSACRE

On April 9, 1948, members of the underground Jewish terrorist group, the Irgun, or IZL, led by Menachem Begin, who was to become the Israeli prime minister in 1977, entered the peaceful Arab village of Deir Yassin, which lay outside of the area that the United Nations recommended be included in a future Jewish State, massacred 250 men, women, children and the elderly, and stuffed many of the bodies down wells. Fifty-three orphaned children were literally dumped along the wall of the Old City.


There were also reports of rapes and mutilations. The Irgun was joined by the Jewish terrorist group, the Stern Gang, led by Yitzhak Shamir, who subsequently succeeded Begin as prime minister of Israel in the early '80s, and also by the Haganah, the militia under the control of David Ben Gurian. The Irgun, the Stern Gang and the Haganah later joined to form the Israeli army. Their tactics have not changed.

A final body count of 254 was reported by The New York Times on April 13, a day after they were finally buried. By then the leaders of the Haganah had distanced themselves from having participated in the attack and issued a statement denouncing the dissidents of Irgun and the Stern Gang.

Of about 144 houses, 10 were dynamited. The cemetery was later bulldozed and, like hundreds of other Palestinian villages to follow, Deir Yassin was wiped off the map. By September, Orthodox Jewish immigrants from Poland, Rumania, and Slovakia were settled there. As occupied Jerusalem expanded, the land of Deir Yassin became part of the city and is now known simply as the area between Givat Shaul and the settlement of Har Nof on the western slopes of the mountain.


The massacre of Palestinians at Deir Yassin is one of the most significant events in 20th-century Palestinian and Israeli history. This is not because of its size or its brutality, but because it stands as the starkest early warning of a calculated depopulation of over 400 Palestinian villages and cities and the expulsion of over 700,000 Palestinian inhabitants to make room for Israelis from all over the world.

The massacre at Deir Yassin was widely publicized by the Israelis and the numerous heaped corpses displayed to the media. In Jaffe, which was at the time 98 percent Arab, as well as in other Arab communities, speaker trucks drove through the streets warning the population to flee and threatening another Deir Yassin. Begin said at the time, "We created terror among the Arabs and all the villages around. In one blow, we changed the strategic situation."

But Deir Yassin was not the only massacre by the Israeli occupation armt. That army, under Moshe Dayan, took the unarmed and undefended village of al-Dawazyma, located in the Al-Khalil hills, massacred 80 to 100 of its residents, and threw their bodies into pits. "The children were killed by breaking their heads with sticks ... The remaining Arabs were then sealed in houses, as the village was systematically razed ..." (Nur Masalha, The Historical Roots of the Palestinian Refugee Question).


In fact, according to UN estimates, 750,000 Palestinians fled the site of the present Zionist entity in 1948. Those refugees and their descendents now number about 4.5 million and constitute the largest refugee population in the world. Many live in squalid refugee camps distributed in the surrounding Arab states or in the West Bank or Gaza, many retain the titles to their land, recognized by the British before 1948 or the Ottomans before that, and many retain the keys to their front doors of their former homes in the occupied territories, whether or not those doors still exists.

Defiance and resistance are two things that the Palestinians have since come to expect from jenin, Deir Yassin and many other massacres. The battles enshrined Occupied Palestine as a stronghold of resistance in the national mythology. Graffiti on ruins in the refugee camps’ center trumpet their defiance: “WE WILL ONLY LEAVE TO RETURN TO OUR HOMES.”


River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

Sunday, 18 April 2010

Remember Qana...Israel’s Turning Point?

Al-Manar


The 1996 massacre of the Mansouri ambulance

18/04/2010

They could have been fathers and mothers today telling their children the stories of what’s right and what’s wrong.

They could have been grandmothers and grandfathers.
They could have been young men and women full of life and working on their future.



106 people could have been anything other than mere remains and anyplace other than under the ground of Qana.

14 years ago, Qana was the scene of an obscene massacre caused by one of Israel’s “Grapes of Wrath.”

Few know that the name the Grapes of Wrath has religious implications. Israeli Rabbi Moshe Cohen explained that the word "grapes" came from the fact that grapes occupied the first position among the seven fruits mentioned in the Talmud, which means that the "grapes of wrath" means anger of the Jewish people.

Israel had bombed the UNIFIL headquarters in the southern town of Qana with “pinpoint accuracy” just after dozens of Lebanese refugees had sheltered there. More than half of the 106 martyrs were children.

One really must have a heart of stone not to feel compassion for those children who became numbers on plastic bags and in some cases small body parts in carpets.

The gruesome pictures of the massacre were published in most Arab newspapers. In the West, however, publishers spared their readers the terrible pictures of how an ill-minded entity steels the future from children. True they respect the dead, but did they respect them when they were alive. The 155mm shell that killed those children was made in the US, and so was the missile that killed the children of the Nabatiyeh massacre on that same day and the children of the Mansouri ambulance massacre earlier and the many Israeli slaughters to follow.

Israel said it was returning fire at Hezbollah and that technical failures might have occurred.

THE UN REPORT

The UN appointed military advisor Major-General Franklin van Kappen of the Netherlands to investigate the massacre. He said in his conclusion that: “a) The distribution of impacts at Qana shows two distinct concentrations, whose mean points of impact are about 140 meters apart. If the guns were converged, as stated by the Israeli forces, there should have been only one main point of impact.
b) The pattern of impacts is inconsistent with a normal overshooting of the declared target (the mortar site) by a few rounds, as suggested by the Israeli forces. c) During the shelling, there was a perceptible shift in the weight of fire from the mortar site to the United Nations compound. d) The distribution of point impact detonations and air bursts makes it improbable that impact fuses and proximity fuses were employed in random order, as stated by the Israeli forces.
e) There were no impacts in the second target area which the Israeli forces claim to have shelled.
f) Contrary to repeated denials, two Israeli helicopters and a remotely piloted vehicle were present in the Qana area at the time of the shelling. While the possibility cannot be ruled out completely, it is unlikely that the shelling of the United Nations compound was the result of gross technical and/or procedural errors.”

SACRIFICED AT THE ALTAR OF ZIONISTS

Then U.N. Secretary General Boutros Boutros-Ghali released the report after coming under severe pressure not to release it though the U.N. Security Council has refused to act on the report or to hold the Israelis accountable. Of course the American veto threat and tremendous pressures upon Boutros-Ghali and member states at the U.N. was behind this further demonstration of U.N. impotence and cowardice. For his crime, Ghali was later sacrificed at the altar of the Zionist masters who controlled the Oval Office.

THE ISRAELI RESPONSE

Israel responded by categorically rejecting the findings of the UN report and insisted that “their investigation” has shown that the UN position was hit by artillery fire “due to incorrect targeting based on erroneous data.”

THE COURSE OF THE WAR

Israel needed to get rid of the July 1993 understanding that put the conflict between occupation forces and the resistance in its absolute military form, excluding civilians from military operations. Moreover, then Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Perez was accused by the Likud and his own Labor party of helplessness in dealing with the Lebanese resistance attacks. Perez was facing election before the summer of 1996. With an American blessing, he exploited the international sympathy with Israel in the wake of the Palestinian resistance attacks. This sympathy was established in the Sharm el-Sheikh summit in Egypt on the 13th of March 1996, which gave Israel full rein to crush resistance forces in Palestine and Lebanon; a plan was set.

Israeli occupation forces opened artillery fire at the southern village of Yater and killed several people. It was the first fruit of the Israeli plot, grapes of wrath. Bit by bit, yet in a fast pace, Israeli artillery fire and air raids expanded to reach the Bekaa region and southern populated areas. The Israeli fire was accompanied by a psychological warfare assumed by the (Voice of the South) radio, controlled by the pro-Israeli militias of chief collaborator Antoine Lahed. Beirut's southern suburbs were targeted with four laser-guided missiles near Hezbollah's Shoura council announcing the beginning of a fierce war. The party's Secretary General Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah announced that Hezbollah will retaliate to the Israeli aggression by bombing settlements in northern occupied Palestine.

And so it happened.

Rounds of Katyusha missiles fell on the settlements of Keryat Shmonah, Nahariya and Metula.
On the fifth day of the aggression, it became evident that the initiative was in the hands of the resistance.
The Israeli command realized that "grapes of wrath" had backlashed. To escape this situation, it intensified military assaults, while the resistance raised its tone and threatened to attack more settlements. In the meantime, Damascus, Tehran and Beirut were confronting the Israeli-American axis, while Paris and Moscow which intervened for calm down had their initiatives hindered by the American demand that concerned parties sign a document calling in one of its article for the deletion of resolution 425; the UN resolution that demanded Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon. Washington was also protecting Israel at the Security Council by vetoing any resolution that condemned Israeli aggressions against Lebanon, including the massacres in Qana, Nabatiyeh and other places.

Realizing Israel was heading to abyss, the Americans launched their own initiative.

Then US Ambassador to Lebanon Richard Jones told then Lebanese government of martyr Rafik Hariri that to end Israeli hostilities in Lebanon, the resistance had to stop attacking Israeli forces in the south, whereas Israeli forces preserved the right to attack Hezbollah positions if they attacked "northern Israel."

Lebanon seemed to be fighting this war alone, amid Arab silence.
Beirut and the Lebanese backed the resistance and Lebanon's allies were working on a cease-fire. The Americans acknowledged that Sayyed Nasrallah had become a major player in any attempt to reach a cease-fire.

Israel's goal to crush and disarm Hezbollah had turned into a request to stop firing Katyusha missiles at settlements in return for a stop of Israel's military campaign.

Then US Secretary of State, Warren Christopher, failed to press for Israel's demands. After seven days of political wrangling, Christopher called up Lebanese Speaker Nabih Berri and PM Hariri for a meeting in Damascus. The April understanding, as it was later known, announced the end of the 16-day Israeli aggression. The signed understanding stated that Israel and its collaborators would not fire at civilian targets and the resistance would not attack "northern Israel" with Katyusha missiles or any other kind of weapons. The understanding included an article to form a monitoring group made up of observers from the US, France, Syria, Lebanon and Israel to oversee the implementation of the understanding.

Operation grapes of wrath ended and the Israeli military assessment concluded it was a failed operation while the political aftermath saw Shimon Peres defeated in Israeli elections.
Ten years later, Israel launched an unprecedented war against Lebanon, in yet another attempt to crush Hezbollah. In the "Second Lebanon War" Qana was again the turning point that changed the course of the war. Israel committed a massacre there killing dozens of people, mainly children and women, hiding from Israeli bombs.

This historical village in south Lebanon has contributed at least twice in hitting the last nails in the coffin of Israel.

According to the Winograd report, the Second Israeli war constituted a humiliating defeat to Israel.
Religiously speaking, the Israelis believe that the beginning of their entity’s end starts with their first defeat – which took place in 2000 and then enhanced by another resounding defeat in 2006.

The resistance remains strong and Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah's promises are fulfilled. Today, despite attempt to distort the resistance and Sayyed Nasrallah’s image, his eminence's pledge, in case of a new Israeli war, is to let the world witness new surprises that would change the course of the battle and the face of the whole region.

Editor's note: This article was published in 2009 and has been slightly modified.


River to Sea
Uprooted Palestinian

Hamas renews its vow to adhere to resistance option



[ 18/04/2010 - 01:56 PM ]


During a ceremony held Saturday on this occasion in Khan Younis, senior Hamas official Saleh Al-Ruqub said that his Movement has pledged to follow in the steps of its great leaders and remain steadfast in the face of all challenges.

Ruqub highlighted in his speech some of the attributes that characterized Rantisi, and his stands that remained fresh in the minds of the Palestinian people and consolidated a stage full of sacrifices.

In a separate statement on Saturday, Hamas affirmed that the Palestinian resistance will never forsake the Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails no matter what happens and will not rest until all prisoners in Israeli jails enjoy freedom.

“On this great national day, the Palestinian prisoner day, we have to rise to the level of steadfastness enjoyed by our heroes in prison in the face of suppression, abuse and pain and in the face of the Arab letdown and the connivance of some people who sold everything for factional and personal gains,” the statement underscored.

For his part, Dr. Khalil Al-Hayya, a member of Hamas’s political bureau, said that the issue of prisoners is like the other Palestinian issues that need all forms of popular and armed resistance.

Dr. Hayya told a news conference held in Gaza city that the Palestinian people cannot achieve their goals especially the return of refugees to their homeland and the liberation of prisoners without rallying around a unified real resistance program that leads to the removal of the occupation from Palestine.

In the same context, the higher Islamic committee stated that the Palestinian prisoners are prisoners of war and not war criminals because they defend the land of Palestine that has been usurped since the Balfour declaration in 1917.

“The prisoners must be treated humanely and according to international laws and norms which guaranteed freedom and dignity for human beings,” the committee said in a statement issued on the Palestinian prisoner day.

For his part, Palestinian activist in prisoners’ affairs Abdelnasser Farwana told Al-Quds Press on Saturday that Israel’s persistence in its intransigent attitude towards the prisoner swap deal would not force the captors of soldier Gilad Shalit to compromise on their demands.

Farwana noted that this Israeli position could, instead, lead the Palestinian resistance to resort to force and capture more Israeli soldiers and settlers in order to get the Palestinian prisoners released.


 18/04/2010 - 09:41 AM ]

GAZA, (PIC)-- Hamas and Islamic Jihad on Saturday stressed that the resistance is their unwavering option to liberate Palestinian prisoners from Israeli jails, adding that their issue is part and parcel of the national cause.

This came during a popular ceremony held on the occasion of the Palestinian prisoner day in the Gaza Strip.

In a speech, senior Hamas official Dr. Ismail Radwan highlighted the importance of upholding the option of resistance in order to liberate all prisoners from captivity and urged the captors of Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit to insist on their demands and not to succumb to pressures.

Dr. Radwan also reiterated his Movement’s keenness on achieving national reconciliation away from the international quartet’s conditions.

For his part, secretary-general of Islamic Jihad Ramadan Shallah said that the issue of prisoners is part of the nations’ conflict over Palestine and anyone compromising on their freedom is similar to those making concessions on Palestine and occupied Jerusalem.

Shallah also highlighted that the freedom of Palestinian prisoners is part of the liberation of the Islamic holy sites, Jerusalem and all Palestine.

In the same context, the national committee of Jordanian prisoners in Israeli jails organized a sit-in on Saturday on the occasion of the Palestinian prisoner day at the headquarters of professional associations in participation of families of missing persons and detainees.

The participants condemned Israel’s repressive actions against Jordanian and Palestinian prisoners, especially depriving the Jordanian and Gaza families from seeing their sons in prison.

On the same occasion, the Palestinian forum in the Netherlands declared on Saturday its full solidarity with the Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails and its intention to actively participate in events that will be held throughout the European continent in support of prisoners.

Secretary-general of the forum Ameen Abu Rashid said in a press release that the issue of prisoners is still a constant concern to the Palestinian people and their supporters all over the world, highlighting the need for activating their issue on a broader scale.

Abu Rashid noted that the Palestinians in Europe feel that their responsibility toward the prisoners has doubled more than before, adding that the Palestinian institutions and assemblies in Europe decided to highlight the issue of detainees at the Palestinians in Europe conference to be held in Berlin within a few weeks.






River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

Rantisi 5 years ago: Either Victory or Martyrdom...and God granted him his wish

Al-Manar
18/04/2010

"My ultimate wish, my God, is to enter your heaven. My ultimate wish, my God, is to attain martyrdom,"

With these words, Hamas leader Abdul Aziz Rantissi folded his book of life. God granted him his wish on April 17, 2004, at the hands of Israeli assassins.

Dr. Abdel Aziz al-Rantissi (October 23, 1947 – April 17, 2004) was the co-founder of the Islamic resistance movement Hamas with its spiritual leader martyr Sheikh Ahmed Yassin.

He was Hamas's political leader and spokesman in the Gaza Strip following the martyrdom of Sheikh Yassin in March 2004.



Like all resistance leaders, Rantissi opposed any compromise with Israel and called for the liberation of the occupied Palestinian territories through armed resistance.

THE MARTYR’S LIFE

Rantissi was born in October 1947 in Yibna, a small town between Ashkelon and Jaffa. When he was 6 months old, and after the Nakba (Catastrophe) of 1948, his family fled to Khan Younis Refugee Camp in Gaza, expecting , as all Palestinians did, to return at war's end.

He started working at the age 6 to provide for his very poor family. Young Rantissi graduated from the UNRWA secondary school in Khan Younis in 1965.

He received a scholarship and began studying pediatric medicine at the University of Alexandria, in Egypt. Upon his graduation in 1972, Rantissi returned to Gaza and a year later founded the Gaza Islamic Center.
In 1974 he returned to Alexandria for his two-year study for Masters in Pediatrics. At that time he took up an internship at Nasser Hospital, the main medical facility in Khan Younis Refugee camp. He also joined the Faculty of Science at the Islamic University of Gaza, on its opening in 1978, teaching science, genetics and parasitology there.

HAMAS FOUNDATION

In January 1987, Israeli settlers and soldiers intentionally killed four Palestinian civilians in the Jabalya refugee camp.

Eventually, Palestinians took to the streets and according to Rantissi, this was the start of the "Intifada".

He joined with Sheikh Ahmad Yassin, 'Abdel Fattah Dukhan, Mohammed Shama', Dr. Ibrahim al-Yazour, Issa al-Najjar, and Salah Shehadeh to found the Islamic resistance movement (Harakat al Mukawwamah al Islamiyya) which was then called "Hamas". He served as the movement leader in Khan Younis.
"Intifada" is the Arabic word used to describe the Palestinian uprising against the Israeli occupation.

ARREST CAMPAIGN AGAINST RANTISSI

Rantissi was arrested in January 1988, accused of authoring Hamas' street pamphlets inciting support for the intifada. He was sentenced to two and a half years in jail.

He was released on September 4, 1990, and effectively led Hamas until rearrested for incitement in November 1990.

He was sentenced to 12 more months, which he served first in isolation with Shiekh Yassin, who was also arrested, and subsequently in solitary. Then he was released from jail December 12, 1991.

He joined Gaza Medical Association in February 1992, and represented Hamas in the July 1992 reconciliation accord that brought an end to intra-Palestinian infighting in the Gaza Strip. (Haider Abdel Shafi signed for the PLO).

In December 1992, Hamas killed six Israeli soldiers in one week. Israel responded by expelling 416 of the movement activists to Marj al-Zuhur in south Lebanon, including Rantissi who acted as spokesman for the deportees. On his return in December 1993, Rantissi was rearrested by Israeli authorities and held until April 1997.

DETENTED BY PA

In April 1998, Rantissi was arrested by the Palestinian Authority, after calling for the resignation of its leaders and served 20 months in jail without trial.

He was arrested again in July 2000, after calling the Palestinian participation in the Camp David talks ‘an act of treason,’ and released in December 2000.

ATTAMPT OF ASSASINATION


June 10, 2003, Rantissi survived an Israeli assassination attempt, which killed two bystanders and left 27 wounded (including one of Rantissi's sons, who was paralyzed). Rantissi himself was wounded by shrapnel in the chest and leg.

MARTYRDOM

Rantissi was appointed head of Hamas in the Gaza Strip following Israel’s assassination of Shiekh Yassin March 22, 2004. He knew that he was marked for death as soon as he took office, but declined to surrender and go underground. He had a defiant thinking about assassination and especially about martyrdom, "It's death whether by killing or by cancer, it's the same thing," martyr Rantissi used to say.

River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

Troops Detain Ten Peace Activists In Hebron

Troops Detain Ten Peace Activists In Hebron
 Sunday April 18, 2010 05:58 by Saed Bannoura - IMEMC & Agencies
Israeli soldiers detained on Saturday evening ten international peace activists in Al Tiwani area in the southern West Bank city of Hebron, and prevented others from entering Beit Ummar Town, north of the city.
Hebron Clashes

The peace activists accompanied several Palestinian farmers heading to their lands when the army attacked the activists and the famers and detained ten internationals.

Israeli settlers escalated their attacks against the residents and their lands in the Hebron area and several parts of the occupied West Bank, while Israeli soldiers failed to stop these attacks, and instead attacked Palestinians and peace activists.

Furthermore, soldiers prevented several international activists from entering Beit Ummar town, north of Hebron, and claimed that the town is a closed military zone.

Soldiers also obstructed a peaceful protests against settlements and against sealing the entrances of the village.

Soldiers also attacked several worshipers near the village’s mosque and fired dozens of gas bombs at them.

The army closed the main entrance of Beit Ummar three days ago, and is preventing and vehicles from entering or leaving the town.
River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

Eli Wiesel: Another irredeemable Zionist liar

[ 17/04/2010 - 11:00 PM ]

By Khalid Amayreh

Last week, I wrote about Ed Koch, the former New York Mayor, a notorious Zionist supremacist who thinks that Israel should be able to carry out genocide in Palestine without receiving criticism from the rest of humanity.

Today, we are affronted with another Zionist supremacist who is no less repulsive. He is Eli Wiesl, who in many ways epitomizes the depravity and brutal ugliness of the Zionist mindset.

For many Americans Wiesel is a great intellectual, a Nobel Laureate, a moralist and great fighter for justice and human decency. However, for millions of other human beings around the world, Wiesel is a fanatical racist figure and irredeemable liar who always places his tribal Jewish-Zionist loyalties above universal human values.

This is the man who was quoted on numerous occasions as saying that he couldn’t bring himself to criticizing Israeli crimes against the Palestinians and other peoples of the Middle East . Well, if he couldn’t bring himself to criticizing Israeli crimes, then he by no means deserves the epithets of moralism, intellectualism and rectitude which the Zionist propaganda machine keeps bestowing on him.

For years, Wiesel has been a willing slave of Israeli apartheid and criminality. In fact, not only did the author of “Night” look the other way when the Nazi-like Israeli army murdered and maimed thousands of Palestinian and Lebanese civilians, including numerous children, and destroyed civilian homes, occasionally right on top of dwellers, but he also sought rather doggedly to defend Israel’s pornographic crimes.

He would invoke the sacrosanct holocaust mantra to defend Israel’s evil crimes as if the perpetration of one holocaust justified the perpetration of another against a people who had nothing to do with the events of the Second World War.

But pornographic crimes, such as last year’s genocidal atrocities in the Gaza Strip, require at least equally pornographic lies to whitewash them or at least mitigate their brutal ugliness. Needless to say, this task was left for people like Wiesel to carry out which he has been trying to do.

In a full-page add published in the Jewish-Zionist newspaper, the Washington Post, Wiesel regurgitated another dose of lies about Palestinian plight. He criticized what he called American “political pressure” on Israel , saying that such a pressure wouldn’t produce a solution to the issue of Jerusalem .

Then what would produce a solution to the issue? Allowing the mad dogs of Zionism to expel the Arabs, the true natives of the city, to the Arabian desert ? Or perhaps accelerating and completing the process of ethnic cleansing now under way in Jerusalem ? Or, maybe, the destruction of Islamic and Christian holy places in the city to make it goy-free?

“For me, the Jew that I am, Jerusalem is above politics. It is mentioned more than six hundred times in Scriptures and not a single time in the Koran.”

Well, first of all, a liar has no right to even allude to the scriptures which teach “thou shall not lie.”

Second, it is not true that Jerusalem is not mentioned in the Quran. In fact, there is an entire –and large- Quranic chapter called “Suratul Israa” which deals with the prophesized corruption by the Children of Israel.

The following are the first few verses of the Sura or chapter:

“1. Glory to ((Allah)) Who did take His servant for a Journey by night from the Sacred Mosque to the Aqsa Mosque, whose precincts We did bless,- in order that We might show him some of Our Signs: for He is the One Who heareth and seeth (all things).
2. We gave Moses the Book, and made it a Guide to the Children of Israel, (commanding): "Take not other than Me as Disposer of (your) affairs."
3. O ye that are sprung from those whom We carried (in the Ark ) with Noah! Verily he was a devotee most grateful.
4. And We gave (Clear) Warning to the Children of Israel in the Book, that twice would they do mischief on the earth and be elated with mighty arrogance (and twice would they be punished)!
5. When the first of the warnings came to pass, We sent against you Our servants given to terrible warfare: They entered the very inmost parts of your homes; and it was a warning (completely) fulfilled.
6. Then did We grant you the Return as against them: We gave you increase in resources and sons, and made you the more numerous in man-power.
7. If ye did well, ye did well for yourselves; if ye did evil, (ye did it) against yourselves. So when the second of the warnings came to pass, (We permitted your enemies) to disfigure your faces, and to enter your Temple as they had entered it before, and to visit with destruction all that fell into their power.
8. It may be that your Lord may (yet) show Mercy unto you; but if ye revert (to your sins), We shall revert (to Our punishments): And we have made Hell a prison for those who reject (all Faith).
9. Verily this Qur'an doth guide to that which is most right (or stable), and giveth the Glad Tidings to the Believers who work deeds of righteousness, that they shall have a magnificent reward; “

Beside, the number of times a place is mentioned in any scripture, doesn’t necessarily mean much in real terms. For example, the City of Mecca is only mentioned a few times in the Quran, but this in no way diminishes its pivotal importance to the Islamic faith.

In the ad, Wiesel the irredeemable liar claims that “ Jews, Christians, and Muslims are able to build their homes anywhere in Jerusalem and that only under Israeli sovereignty has freedom of worship for all religions been assured in the city.”

Well, does Wiesel think he is addressing a totally ignorant people in America , people who have no idea what difference there is between truth and falsehood? Are Americans really a totally ignorant people when it comes to Israel? Are they willing consumers of Zionist lies and propaganda?

I am asking these questions because the utter mendacity of Wiesel’s claim is crying out to the seventh heaven.

Lying is the fornication of the tongue, of which Wiesel and other fanatical Zionist apologists excel especially when addressing a western audience. This is why, he seemingly feels no shame going to any extent in disregarding the most axiomatic facts about even the most fundamental aspects of the Palestinian plight.

Asking “Is there a solution,” Wiesel answers rather smidely “There must be, there will be.”

However, in explaining his deformed perception of that “solution,” which actually amounts to a total liquidation of Palestinian rights, the Nazi-minded Wiesel (Nazi minded because he pays no attention to the issue of justice when it comes to non-Jews), he demands rather deceptively that Israel be given sufficient time to complete and perfect the theft of Arab land and property.

“Why tackle the most complex and sensitive problem prematurely? Why not first take steps which will allow the Israeli and Palestinian communities to find ways to live together in an atmosphere of security. Why not leave the most difficult, the most sensitive issue, for such a time.”

You see the deceitful, morbid discourse of this man who calls himself a “moralist.”! He would like to see the international community, principally to give the Judeo-Nazi regime in Israel more time to effect more ethnic cleansing until the criminal entity reaches a stage at which there will be nothing left to talk about. That would signal the liquidation of the Palestinian cause.

I Wonder why some people in the West still object when Zionists are called “the Nazis of our time.”



River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

Interview with Carlos Latuff by Kourosh Ziabari


Kourosh Ziabari
Independent freelance journalist, Iran


Interview with Carlos Latuff:
I don't trade ideology for money
Interview by Kourosh Ziabari for Iran's Jame-Jam newspaper

The hero of "freedom of speech", boycotted by the corporate, mainstream media that are irresistible against the astringent truth: this is the most precise and accurate introduction which I can present about Carlos Latuff. Born in the suburbs of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, he is an artist of conscience whose artistic commitment and morality prevented him from becoming the pawn of imperialism.
Carlos Latuff is a world-renowned cartoonist who has long brought into existence artistic works and cartoons in which the footsteps of creativity, novelty, intelligence and decency can be traced noticeably. He has never been given the opportunity to showcase his matchless cartoons in the New York Times, Guardian, Washington Post, BBC or CNN; however, the narrow hallways of personal blogs and independent media outlets which allowed his cartoons to breathe in the atmosphere of publicity, made him a man of genuineness and reality, known by those who seek something beyond the outdated, obsolete propaganda of "all options are on the table".
Carlos Latuff has drawn numerous cartoons which depict the pains of oppressed nations around the world; from the Palestinians being suffocated under the Israeli occupation to the Iranians receiving the spates of psychological operation co-manufactured by the White House and Tel Aviv.

Here is the complete text of my interview with Carlos Latuff, conducted for Iran's best-selling newspaper Jame-Jam, where we elaborately discussed his intellectual mission and the prospect of his artistic trajectory.

Kourosh Ziabari: Dear Carlos; it seems that you've dedicated your entire mission to independent, freelance journalism and one can clearly figure out that you are not usually paid in lieu of what you draw for the magazines, newspapers and websites since a complete set of your cartoons and caricatures are available on your website for free. Do you accede to draw cartoons which are contrary to your ideological mindset should you be offered remarkable, irresistible payments?

Carlos Latuff: No way! I will only make artworks according my own Leftist beliefs. I don't trade ideology for money. I work for Leftist trade union (workers) press since 1990, that's what I make for living. Mainstream media would never pay me for making anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist artworks. But I have what I call of "artistic activism", producing cartoons and making them available on the Web for free of charge reproduction; cartoons with a different point of view from the Western mainstream media; cartoons exposing what Michael Moore would call of "the awful truth". I already refused payments for my drawings about Palestine. Solidarity can't be measured by dollars.

KZ: You've received serious death threats from the Zionist circles and Israeli groups a number of times. Would you please explain for us a little about the details of these threats and the consequential events that followed them? Have you ever thought of putting aside your professional and artistic mission in order to preserve your safe, tranquil life?

CL: In 2006 a website associated to Likud (Likudnik) published a long article about me, my art, my support to Palestinians and labeled me as an agent at the service of a supposed "Iranian propaganda machine", comparing me with Nazi propagandists. The author of the article argued why Israel didn't take care of me before and urged readers to take steps against me. Let me be straight, I really don't care about threats. Along the Palestinian cause I also support human rights organizations against police brutality in Brazil. This kind of activism alone could put me in high risk of life. But, as I said, I don't care; I will continue with my artistic support, 'cause if Zionists worldwide are pissed off about my cartoons, it's because I'm doing something right. Death can stop me yes, but not my cartoons. That's why I make them run free around the world through Internet.

KZ: You belong to a prosperous country which is the 8th economic power of the world and the 10th trade partner of the United States. Brazil also maintains normal ties with Israel and this is something which many anti-war and anti-imperialism activists dislike. Coming from such a country, you profoundly grasped the essence of oppressed nations' suffering and sympathized with them wholeheartedly. How did you rise from Brazil and came to assist the oppressed nations?

CL: I grown up in the suburbs of Rio and my parents worked hard to give me study and a humble but decent life. Being the 8th economic power makes no difference to the ordinary people in Brazil. We have poverty, corruption, criminal and police violence, influent and strong landowners in countryside, people dying of dengue fever and malaria, and a mainstream media which is always trying to convince public opinion that everything is ok with capitalism. As someone living in a Third World country I can't turn a blind eye to this situation here and in other parts of the world. Last year I was in Palestinian refugee camps in Jordan and Lebanon, places very similar to Brazilian slums (favelas). It wasn't hard to realize that the language of poverty is universal, as universal must be the solidarity with people in need.

KZ: You've for years cooperated with a number of media outlets in the Western countries and can precisely estimate the veracity of the slogan of "freedom of expression" in the countries who introduce themselves as the harbingers of liberty and tolerance. I clearly remember the spates of verbal and political attacks on the artists who had participated in Iran's International Holocaust Cartoon Competition. Even the then United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan had condemned the contest and this could simply demonstrate the lopsidedness of "freedom" which they claim to be the pioneers thereof. What's your idea about that? Are the western media outlets really free?

CL: Still today I've been accused of denying Holocaust because of that artwork for which I won the second place in the Iranian cartoon contest. It's funny since the cartoon shows a Palestinian elderly wearing a concentration camp uniform, which not only affirms the existence of the Nazi Holocaust as well as making a comparison between it and the suffering of the Palestinians. I believe that this contest had exposed the Western's double standard. When you ridicule and attack Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), Islam or Muslims, then this is called "satire", "humor", "freedom of speech", whatever. Joking about Islam is pretty acceptable. Islamophobia is popular in the US and Europe, specially after September 11. However the same freedom you have for making cartoons about Islam and its Prophet you won't have while dealing with Holocaust and Israel. If you dare draw Israeli soldiers killing Palestinians (isn't a fact?), you will be automatically labeled as anti-Semitic. While Muhammad cartoons were wide spread in Europe, Holocaust cartoons weren't not reproduced in any European newspaper.

KZ: Your stance towards Iran's nuclear program (Iran intends to meet its energy, electricity needs through nuclear reactors) and Israel's nuclear program (Israel possess up to 200 nuclear warheads, according to the Federation of American Scientists) is delicately accurate and specific, indicating your extensive acquaintance with the regional equations and developments. Iran is being lethally pressured to halt its civilian nuclear program and Israel has been unconditionally safeguarded by Washington to keep up with its military atomic program. What's your take on this?

CL: In fact all this turmoil about Iranian nuclear program has more to do with the fear of US, Europe and Israel of having a country in Middle East with nuclear capability. It will change the geopolitics in the region, since no Arab country was ever allowed by US of having anything nuclear. Only Israel can have not only nuclear plants but also nukes, immune to inspections and international law. If Iran will develop nuclear capabilities for civilian or military use, it doesn't matter. The point is, if US, Europe and Israel are so concerned about threats to peace, why don't they start proposing sanctions against Pakistan and India, since both countries have a nuclear arms race since long time? Because both countries are allies of Washington? Why not a single word about the Israeli nuclear program? Why Mordecai Vanunu is prevented to speak about it?

KZ: Most of your critics accuse you of arising anti-Semitic sentiments by drawing cartoons which condemn the State of Israel and its leaders for the atrocities and felonies they commit. Is this the case that you're opposed to Jews as the followers of a divine religion, or do you simply go up against the expansionist Zionists who commit crimes against humanity and massacre the defenseless people of Palestine?

CL: I'm not a religious man, and none of my cartoons deal with Judaism. You won't find any of my artworks attacking the Jewish. My issue with Israel and their supporters is only about politics, imperialism. Even not being Muslim, I do support Muslims against Islamophobia, since I can't agree with prejudice against religion. Of course anything that may be slightly perceived as criticism towards Israel will be associated with hatred towards Jews. This old trick is applied to anyone who dares speak against Israeli apartheid. But everyday more activists understand this misuse of anti-Semitism and keep the struggle regardless of the false allegations and smear campaigns from Zionists.

KZ: Have the global mainstream media outlets (the New York Times, Washington Post, Guardian, Los Angeles Times, BBC, Reuters, Associated Press and so forth) which universally rule the public opinions ever published your cartoons? Why don't such media outlets which assert to be the pioneers of freedom of expression accept allowing the publication of disparate viewpoints which are contrary to their focal approach?

CL: Reuters made a video interview with me last year about my art and views. I had some of my cartoons shown on Al Jazeera and George Galloway show at Press TV, but this is an exception. Usually only Arab media outlets are interested in my opinions. Western mainstream media isn't interested in giving space to a Leftist artist who supports people's struggle in Palestine, Iraq and elsewhere. But in a way or another, I find a place to make my opinions visible. Internet is my best ally. You see, even not being a famous artist promoted by mainstream media, you and your newspaper know about me and my cartoons. Internet has broken the obstacles imposed by corporate media. And I won't make concessions for mere 15 minutes of fame; will keep fidelity with my principles.

KZ: The subjugated people of Palestine and other countries which have been subject to the brutality of imperialism throughout the history will be encouraged and hopeful when they find conscientious artists like you sympathizing with them. Have you ever felt the courage and valor you present to the people of Palestine with your artistic endeavors?

CL: I'm very suspicious for talking about the Palestinians. I have never seen such a brave and courageous people like them. I started making cartoons about Palestinians since my trip to West Bank in 1999 and since then my sympathy for their cause only grow up. After my recent visit to Jordan and Lebanon, invited by Al Hannouneh Society for Popular Culture, I realized that my relation with Palestinians is not only political. I have pure love for that people.

KZ: Please tell us about your latest activities. How was the experience of winning a prize in the Iran-based International Holocaust Cartoon Competition? Do you like to come to Iran once again and touch the pains and difficulties of the Iranian people in person?

CL: Usually I don't participate in contests, since I'm not interested in the prizes and stuff. The purpose of my art is supporting social movements, rather than feeding my own ego. But I saw the Holocaust cartoon competition as a timely opportunity for making visual comment about Palestinian suffering. In that occasion, I was invited by my good friend Massoud Tabatabai to attend the prize award ceremony in Teheran but unfortunately I wasn't able to travel. But of course if I had another chance, I would be more than glad to visit Iran.