Via FLC
Having moved from one success to another, Iraq's WMDs & the easy war in Iraq, this lovely couple want to sell you a new 'objective': "Not to oust Nouri al Maliki'" but to neuter him!
'Honey? We destroyed that place!'
"... This vision of relations will seem palatable to Americans and Iraqis who want to believe that all will be well after the withdrawal of U.S. troops. But the image is a mirage. It rests on inaccurate portrayals of the situation in Iraq and Maliki’s policies. It also lacks a strategy to secure vital U.S. interests in the region.Even after the last U.S. soldier departs, America’s core interests in Iraq include:●Ensuring that Iraq contributes to the security of the Middle East (Iran), rather than undermining it through state collapse, civil war or the establishment of a sectarian dictatorship;●Ensuring that terrorist groups affiliated with al-Qaeda or backed by Iran cannot establish sanctuaries;●Promoting an Iraq that abides by its international responsibilities;●Containing Iranian influences that are harmful to U.S. interests in Iraq and the region; and●Signaling U.S. commitment to the region at a pivotal moment in history (Iran).Securing these and other U.S. interests requires two basic conditions: First, Iraq must be able to control, police and defend its territory, airspace and waters. Second, Iraq must preserve and solidify the multi-ethnic and cross-sectarian political accommodation that was established in 2008 and 2009 but that has been eroding since the formation of the current government.
Neither condition is likely to be met in the coming years... ... Even more troubling than the security weaknesses is the erosion of the fragile political settlement. Maliki has pursued a sectarian agenda focused on consolidating power and monopolizing control of the state and security forces under his Dawa Party... ... The reality is that Maliki has just announced a policy of prosecuting — in some cases persecuting — selected former members of the Baath Party ... Obama administration policy presumes that Maliki generally shares U.S. interests and will pursue them even without significant American assistance. Were that true, Maliki would aggressively protect American civilian and diplomatic personnel who have been threatened by the cleric Moqtada al-Sadr and recently targeted to such a degree that the embassy has restricted their travel. He would direct security forces to act against Iranian-sponsored militias in Iraq. Rather than abstaining, he would have supported the Arab League’s vote to suspend Syrian membership. He would see to it that Ali Mussa Daqduq, the Lebanese Hezbollah operative responsible for the execution of American soldiers in Karbala in 2007, is transferred to U.S. custody or tried in Iraq and punished for his crimes. He would appoint a permanent minister of defense and an interior minister acceptable to Parliament rather than concentrating those powers in his office... ... ... ... The president should tell Maliki in no uncertain terms that Washington will hold him to account in the international arena if Iraq does not....
An independent (READ THE ABOVE RECOMMENDATIONS TO SEE THE MEANING OF THAT WORD!), stable and responsible Iraqi state is critical to U.S. interests in the Middle East. A substantive policy toward that end can result from a combined insistence that Iraq adhere to international laws and norms, pressure on Iraqi leaders to deepen the political settlements under such stress, and the positive incentives of genuine military cooperation. The objective would not be to oust Maliki but to do what the 2008 Strategic Framework Agreement specified: “support and strengthen Iraq’s democracy and its democratic institutions as defined and established in the Iraqi Constitution, and in so doing, enhance Iraq’s capability to protect these institutions against all internal and external threats.” Such a policy would reflect U.S. values and could help ensure free, fair and inclusive elections in 2013, so the Iraqi people preserve the representative government to which so many in the Middle East aspire."
Uprooted Palestinian
No comments:
Post a Comment