William dB. Mills suggests that in order to narrow-down the gap between P5+1 and Iranian expectations, the United States must recognize, 1) Iran’s right to enrichment allowed as a signatory of NPT, 2) Israel’s nuclear rogue status and 3) what “Tehran will get for accepting any part of the highly discriminatory rules the US wishes to impose on Iran“.
“So far, the West gives no appearance of intending to negotiate anything other than Iran’s surrender. That ain’t happening; it’s recipe for disaster. Moreover, if somehow did occur, it would only set the stage for a more serious subsequent crisis; Israeli extremists would be emboldened and all Iranian would be infuriated. As for negotiating a genuine solution, the Western position is still not even close to the starting gate,” wrote Mills.
Iranian top negotiator, Saeed Jalili, has stated that though he is still optimist about the P5+1 and Iranian meeting in Moscow, however, he emphasized that Tehran will never cancel it enrichment program. Asked about the US alleged concerns about Iran’s 20-percent enriched uranium, Jalili reiterated, “Shouldn’t the US be concerned about the disappearance of 120kg of highly-enriched uranium on its (the US) soil?”
Jalili was refering to the news published in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists that ”741 pounds of highly enriched uranium suitable for weapons production disappeared from NUMEC while Dr. Zalman Shapiro (a Zionist Jew) was president and was likely diverted into the Israeli nuclear weapons program“.
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!
No comments:
Post a Comment