[The Secretary General of Hizbullah His Eminence] Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah does not belong to this world. He stands on another planet as the official Arab world lies on another.This man and whom he represents is strange. He really speaks of Palestine and of al-Quds as if it will return after the Arabs who believe in America, oil, and media abandoned it.
He prepares for the day of "Israeli" remorse and other days of fear and horror for the settlers if their entity dared to attack Lebanon, the smallest and weakest country in the region, but rather in the world.
What sort of beautiful madness is this awareness, this promise, and this Palestine!He doesn't belong to this world ... that we are immersed into and that we dissociated away from Palestine.
This world said that "Mecca's people better know its roads."It happily abandoned the holy al-Quds city preferring to restore to authority and begging to stick with all its excellence in the practice of oppression and dominance.
Arab world turns its people to fields of shooting by live ammunition...to fields of oppression and looting and their effects, to degradation and its levels, and to animal-hood and its imitation to Pavlov's doctrine.
Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah's map is Palestine and al-Quds is its capital.
Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, and whom he represents believe in the Palestinian Palestine... its definition, content, past and future. Whether Shiite, Sunni , secular or atheists, their hope isn't to be affected by disbelief in their case. Their effort doesn't lack action to support it. They were guided to the right path, and never changed their track.
Others, are very old .. Since the Palestinian case was born and since the nation was divided into entities, systems, religions, sects, doctrines, families, clans and tribes, and since kings, princes, armed men and robbers seized power, they are dealing with Palestine as a local investment and a lucrative trade. They have been so long ago.
They went to Palestine in 1948, to take it or to take from it, if they didn't succeed to control it all. He who took part of its land and seized it arrested it.
He who took a name of it hanged a badge on his chest, and became a Marshal or a general.
Others, even those who led their armies to fight "Israel", lost the battle after the defeat, and they lost more after a semi victory in November's October's war. "Israel", an entity that should have feared the armed armies, and the hundred million Arabs, was scary. And as "Israel", over the years, accelerated the process of non-stopped arming, the Arabs promoted the concept of realism, relied on peace, and pointed their guns to the their people's hearts. They even set their armies under the West's orders in its wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. They replaced their hostility towards "Israel" with another to the Soviet Union, and another aggressive hostility towards Iran.
This man is an adventurer. The world stands against him, and he is not afraid. However, "Israel" is afraid of him. He never entered a battle and lost.
They went to Palestine in 1948, to take it or to take from it, if they didn't succeed to control it all. He who took part of its land and seized it arrested it.
 |
| *“ We met [on 10 May] amicably. He was very worried and looks terrible. He did not deny that there had been talk and understanding between us about a desirable arrangement, namely that he would take the Arab part [of Palestine]. (...) But Abdullah had said that he could now, on 10 May, only offer the Jews "autonomy" within an enlarged Hashemite kingdom. He added that while he was not interested in invading the areas allocated for Jewish statehood, the situation was volatile. But he voiced the hope that Jordan and the Yishuv would conclude a peace agreement once the dust had settled. ” Ben-Gurion Diary |
Others, even those who led their armies to fight "Israel", lost the battle after the defeat, and they lost more after a semi victory in This man is an adventurer. The world stands against him, and he is not afraid. However, "Israel" is afraid of him. He never entered a battle and lost.
- The 1993 Accountability Operation was in his favor.
- Similarly, the 1996 Grapes of Wrath made "Israel" taste its bitter grapes and subjected it to the harsh equality.
- 25 May 2000, "Israel" fled from the occupied south, describing the security belt as the valley of tears.
- In July 2006, the "Israeli" fear exceeded all expectations ... The superior regional "state", supported and surrounded by American, Western and Arab ( rulers, princes, and presidents ), withdrew out of the battle, pulling its disappointment ...
After July ,"Israel" got a tail that it won't escape. The July's curse still chases "Israel" till today and until the near tomorrow for who expects it.
Is this an aberration from the norm? Is the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon a miracle from the outside, or it is strongly drawing the position through the stiffness of action, the certainty of victory, and the nobility of the case?
Do the others resemble the irregularity of the rule so that they chose to build on the loss?
Is the Arab official world , in its both the former reactionary and present moderation branches , strange from the region. Is it drawn by a foreigner? The two. But the resistance is from us and with us while the moderation regimes are from and against us.
Palestine was familiar to people who believed and vowed... and did not succeed. They were firm in their confrontation and struggle, until the Arab regimes brought them down before "Israel" shot them. The Palestinian cause is a century-old. Since the outbreak of the waves of Zionist immigration, it didn't stop until after a loss. In most eras, Palestinians were fighting alone.
This comes as the official Arab help is too much accounted on it. The calculation to stay in power is more useful and more convincing than the confrontation with "Israel", except for Abdul Nasser, who resigned. (even though he returned after the defeat of 1967) .. Others stuck to power after every defeat, and others sought surrender in search of safety.
Most of the Arab rulers, were with Palestine from above the platforms, and through rhetorical tone that raises whirlwinds of dusty speech. At the same time, they were against the Palestinians ... "Israel" expelled and detained their regimes so they were guests of camps (large prisons) and detention cellars. Rarely did a Palestinian leader escape arrest or rarely did another activist survived torture. Rarely did any Arab citizen escape prosecution, whether a defender or a committed to Palestine.
These regimes are not alien to us, if they were not from us. They are of the same age of the told entities that were born after the massacre of Sykes-Picot and that of Maysaloun. The age of these systems is the same of that of their dependency to the West, the builder of these entities, the engineer of its retreat , programmer of its retract, the programmer of looting its wealth, and the teacher of people's subjection instead of human rights.
This resistance also, is not strange from us, but it is from us and with us. Its age goes back to parties, organizations and national leaders who fought "Israel" but didn't celebrate victory over it.
This resistance, has origins in Sultan Basha al-Atrash, the betrayed leader of the Great Syrian Revolution.
The resistance has also origins in the revolutions of Hanano and Saleh Ali.
Its origins lies in the lonely left Izz al-Din al-Qassam's revolution.
It has bases in Gaza's Guevara, Said al-Aas and Fawzi al-Kawekgi ... And the list goes on to reach Sacrifice organizations.
And between official Arab regimes and the resistance a great hostility.
The resistance was never reconciled with the neither the state's structure nor with its region and powers. The resistance moves away from the logic of the state, which prefers stability on paying the consequences of the revolution and commitment ... Therefore, where the state was strong in its system, authority, security and grip, the resistance was either reined or detained. And always the state shows power against while it favors to show weakness in face of "Israel". It calls its weakness wisdom.
The resistance has succeeded in Lebanon, because the state is weak. If this state was strong, the resistance would have lost its birth ... Lebanon's virtue is that it is weak and that it allowed sects to overcome its power and to rob it. However, this placed the resistance in the strongest position in the region. These sects devastated the country while this resistance triumphed it. Perhaps the Bible means the case of Lebanon in saying:
"The stone which the builders threw become the head of the corner,"it became the foundation. Lebanon's weakness forms a passage card without barriers for the sects to occupy the state, while it forms a transit card for the resistance to liberate the country from foreign occupation.
 |
| السيد حسن نصر الله، ليس من هذا العالم. هو في كوكب، والعالم العربي الرسمي في كوكب آخر. |
Never try... Lebanon is stronger ... Sayyed's speech was crucial, as it does not belong to the world of peaceful thinkers who have donated in and after Oslo to provide 'constructive ideas', to persuade "Israel" with a political settlement .. They granted "Israel" security. They were ready (the revision of Makiya, Saghia, Bashir and others is necessary) to convert the official Arab system to a guard for the "Israeli" security. The "Israeli" security is required to be guaranteed from the countries and peoples of the region i.e. from the Gulf to the ocean ... "Israel" needs a complete security.
Sayyed's words are different. Their words are remains of concessions that "Israel" did not accept. "Israel" wants full and complete surrender. It wants Palestine and its people, and to make the region under its hegemony ... Some Arabs have accepted to be a back garden for "Israel", guarded US military bases, and "Israeli" guard dogs.
 |
| We Have “Israeli” Targets, We Can Turn Their Lives into Living Hell |
Sayyed Nasrallah said:
"We are in a world that respects only the strong, and any Arab country that wants to be free from aggression must be strong."
In response to the increasing "Israeli" threats against Iran and Lebanon, he said:
"We do not deny that "Israel" has a strong destructive power ... I will not say that we can destroy "Israel", but we can say that we transform the lives of millions of Zionists in Palestine to a real hell and we can change the face of "Israel"…A war with Lebanon will be very costly. There are targets in Palestine that can be hit with very few rockets. These rockets can turn the lives of tens of thousands of "Israelis" into hell.... We will not hesitate in using these rockets to hit any of the targets, the "Israelis" should know very well that the cost of any coming war is very costly, and cannot be measured to that of the 2006 war."
The International al-Quds Day, during Sayyed's speech, was a global day. Dr. Samir Geagea was searching for a state under the rubble, Walid Jumblatt was cutting his temporary bridges with Lebanese parties and sewing up politics with his multidirectional jump, and the extinct Arab official regimes official were looking for a way to fight Iran in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and the Gulf. However, "Israel" was busy studying Sayyed Nasrallah's speech because once he talks "Israel" believes ,fears, and takes his words seriously.
The planet of official Arab team wants to reassure "Israel", and stands on the same side with "Israeli" axis against Iran and Hizbullah. Meanwhile, the resistor planet bans the eyes of the "Israeli" leaders from enjoying sleep as they are living tough choices and serious time, which is imposed on them by the Islamic resistance in Lebanon. There is a great difference between the two teams.
This resistance is the nation's project its future. Nevertheless, despite its firmness, strength, decision to confront only "Israel", building strength, and training skills is suffering difficult days.
Lebanon the weak, its grace, had been positively employed.
The mangled Lebanon is a curse to the resistance: the wearing out is contagious, and is transmitted.
The resistance that participated in the authority power, has proved to be not good at dancing with lames. They hunt it, in all places. They drag it to all squares, target it from all directions, and the goal is far beyond politics ... The sole goal is to hit the resistance's arms.
The Arab officials, followers of Sultan's norms, do not a resistance with a Shiite incubating environment. The Arab moderation team, mostly Sunni, has no problem with the Shiites, but with the resistance. They want Shiites ants without arms.
The Arab officials, followers of Sultan's norms, do not a resistance with a Shiite incubating environment. The Arab moderation team, mostly Sunni, has no problem with the Shiites, but with the resistance. They want Shiites ants without arms.
The Arab Spring in Damascus hit the resistance as the sectarian inflation in Lebanon tired it. The clans and the Sidon al-Assir family, Miqdad clan and all .. all ... The resistance has no ability to deal proudly with this arsenal.
As a Shiite resistance, it is obliged to be part of the Lebanese political class.
The safety net for the resistance in Lebanon, is not it's being a Shiite but rather in having a national safety. So, why did it neglect this and stuck to the merely Shiite merely quorum?
The believers in the eligibility of the "Arab Spring" principles and its objectives, as well as those who believe in freedom, justice, dignity and human rights, wish that Sayyed's speech reached them, to add to the seasons of the Arab Spring, the Palestinian cause…
Source: as-Safir, Translated and Edited by moqawama.org
River to Sea
Uprooted Palestinian 
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!
No comments:
Post a Comment