It is obvious to all that their defeat is colossal. I wonder, why don’t they just admit it and move on?
Let’s face it. Wimborne-Idrissi is at least correct in some regards -- I do indeed argue that:
1. “Jewishness is a tendency towards segregation and a form of a supremacist ideology fuelled by choseness.”
2. "Jewish Marxism is a very strange form of national Socialism."
3. I do believe that Zionism is a continuation of Jewishness (a tendency towards segregation and a form of a supremacist ideology fuelled by choseness).
4. I forcefully argue that Zionism is not colonialism.
And yet, not one of the above statements are anti Semitic or racist -- As you may note, there is not one single reference to Jews as a people, a race, as a group united 'by blood lines', or collection of genes. Instead, I criticise Jewish ideology. And In case Wimborne Idrissi is willfully missing something, criticising ideology is still actually considered to be a legitimate endeavour until further notice.
But I suppose that Wimborne-Idrissi considers that Jews as well as Jewish ideology are beyond criticism. And that is clearly just another symptom of her deeply supremacist worldview.
Shamelessly, Wimborne-Idrissi writes, “those who equate Zionism with Jewishness do not belong in the movement.” Once again a Jewish ethnic activist seems to suggest to us what the Palestinian solidarity movement is all about. Sadly enough, Wimborne-Idrissi refuses to admit the obvious -- that Israel defines itself as the Jewish State. Israel also drops bombs on Gazans from planes decorated with Jewish symbols. Surely then, Wimborne-Idrissi had better explain to us, once and for all; why can’t we then question what Jewishness stands for?
But I guess that I know the answer: Wimborne-Idrissi, understands that any criticism of Jewishness will also apply to her own ‘Jews Only’ political cell, for -- categorically and by definition -- both Israel and Wimborne-Idrissi’s 'J-Big' are exclusive Jewish clubs. They are both driven by the idea that being Jewish is somehow unique: otherwise, I cannot understand why Wimborne-Idrissi refuses to boycott Humus Sabra together with the Goyim.
It is important to mention that neither I nor anyone else in our movement has ever condemned ‘Jews within the movement and those who work with them’. No one is criticising Jews as people. And no one -- except the Jews only cells -- believes in trying to silence anyone. I believe in freedom of speech. I believe that vibrant discourse is crucial for any political or ideological movement.
And I would support Wimborne- Idrissi -- once she decides to engage in an open debate instead of conspiratorial clandestine strategies.
I am afraid that I have some bad news for Wimborne-Idrissi & Co. Being an ex-Jew and an independent thinker, I am not a member of any synagogue or Trotsky-ite congregation. From a Jewish perspective then, I am untouchable. The large variety of old Jewish tactics such as Excommunication and Exclusion have already proved to be futile with me. The few Jews in this movement who attempt to perform these old Middle ages Rabbinical rites and strategies against me will achieve little, besides exposing themselves for who they are and what they are : i.e. crypto Zionists.
And I wish them luck.
As I was about to publish this post, a mole within the ‘progressive’ Jewish league sent me the date and location of the first 'anti Atzmon gathering'. The meeting is proposed for Saturday 18/6 at 3pm. Venue is Lucas Arms,245a Gray's Inn Road, London WC1
http://www.allinlondon.co.uk/clubs_bars/venue-1583.php
I would love to be there. I would be the perfect leader for this new Jewish revolutionary party. As a self-hater, I also have a lot of problems with Atzmon. Every night when I am desperate to go to bed and close my eyes, he keeps on writing about Israel, AIPAC, Lord Levy, Jews Only Clubs and so on. I am sick of it, I have been stuck with him for too long. Considering my intimate and deep knowledge of this character, I should probably be the secretary of the new party. But unfortunately, I will be with Atzmon that Afternoon. He is performing that day in front of those ‘clueless anti Semite idiots’ who for some bizarre reason love him, oppose tribalism, defy racism and follow his universal ethical dribble.
End
The following is an email sent by Naomi Wimborne-Idrissi to selected 'revolutionary' chosen members within the UK ‘anti Zionist’ network.
Dear xxx
Countering racism, fighting Zionism
A potent Zionist weapon in undermining the Palestinian cause is the
accusation of anti-Semitism. While the pro-Palestinian cause is
overwhelmingly anti-racist and does not tolerate anti-Semitism, there
have been some signs recently that individuals promoting views that
can only be viewed as anti-Semitic have been gaining an audience
within the solidarity movement.
As just one example, a number of activists were present at a meeting
in London on May 3 (http://goo.gl/sdRoz) at which they applauded a
platform speaker explaining his view that "Jewishness is the real
problem." “Jewishness”, he said, was “a tendency towards segregation"
and a form of “supremacist ideology fuelled by chosenness”. He
attributed to "Jewish Marxists . . . a very strange form of national
socialism".
We are organizing a meeting to discuss this developing situation, and
to arrive we hope at an agreed strategy for countering it.
There is a strange symmetry. Zionists equate Judaism and being Jewish
with their own racist political philosophy. It is embodied in the
State of Israel as ' the state of the Jews '. They allege that
anti-Zionism equals anti-Semitism. Any Jew who does not agree is a
'self-hater'. Likewise racists and religious extremists also equate
Zionism with Judaism and being Jewish, and use the atrocities being
committed on behalf of the Zionist project as a stick with which to
beat Jews, regardless of their views about Israel.
The equation Jew = Zionist is a lie promoted by the state of Israel
to boost its international support and so weaken the Palestinian
cause. For supporters of Palestine to blame 'Jewishness' (rather than
Western colonialism) for the oppression of Palestinians is a
potentially damaging diversion from the real argument. Any significant
spread of this viewpoint would give some credibility to the Zionists'
allegations of anti-Semitism in the Palestine solidarity movement, and
so divide and discredit it.
Proponents of such ideas pose as friends of Palestine while attacking
and condemning Jews within the movement and those who work with them.
Behind such views lies a sinister, far-right dimension exposed, for
example, in these links: http://goo.gl/PGruW
http://goo.gl/huOml
Those who equate Zionism with Jewishness do not belong in the
movement. Their political home is elsewhere -- among fellow racists.
In order to ensure that this is better understood among the whole
community of activists and sympathizers with the Palestinian cause, we
propose to produce a briefing document examining and exposing these
destructive, anti-Semitic arguments.
The purpose of this message is to invite you and/or a representative
of your organisation to join us at a meeting to discuss the content of
such a document and how it could best be used. Please reply to the
sender. This invitation is not intended for wider circulation.
The meeting is proposed for Saturday 18/6 at 3pm. Venue is Lucas Arms,
245a Gray's Inn Road, London WC1
http://www.allinlondon.co.uk/clubs_bars/venue-1583.php
In solidarity,
Naomi Wimborne-Idrissi
No comments:
Post a Comment