Link
The Zionist entity claimed it is its divine right to steal the lands it desires, and commit massacres against their peoples whether Arabs or non Arabs who “dare” help or declare sympathy with them, and they and their leaders announce without shame, on the contrary, with stupidity, vulgarity and racism without limits: For example the Shas Zionist religious party’s leader, Ofadia Yusuf saying: “All Arabs should be exterminated, all of their descendents should perish, God should eliminate them from the surface of the earth, it is forbidden to invocate mercy for them, they should all be desolated and exterminated with rockets. (“Maarive” 9/4/2001), and claims that the Obama Administration is befriending world’s dictators, but if it actually does it’s the Zionist entity that is the dictatorship. A self proclaimed democracy cannot be an invader, occupier, up-rooter/annihilator, racist towards the indigenous population of an invaded land. The “Fiery Spirited Zionist” that has one of the biggest arsenals of WMD claims “Obama Plans to Punish Israel if it Attacks Iran”, because this country is developing atomic energy, whether this energy is being developed for civilian or military use, it is no concern of this rogue out of place entity, which had been waging wars and threatening peoples that were established and continued to exist thousands of years on their own lands, such a peoples has the full right to protect themselves against warmongers and blood thirty colonialist states whether it is the United States of America or the Zionist entity who both were established on foreign lands that were colonized and ethnically cleansed by them, and are still practicing expansionist policies.
Whether it is the Obama Administration or all others that preceded it had ever planned or intended to plan to punish the Zionist war mongering entity if it attacks Iran.
I could not find anything better to reply to Zionist nonsense then what our friend Raj Chmayel and his twin brother Sherlock Hommos wrote that we quote here below:
“What is still left over to be called, racism ?? "
http://www.freepali.com/images/israeli_racism.jpg
Brown-Palestinian fleeing
from the White-Jews .
in 1948
There is today a UN international conference on Racism
in Geneva , Swisserland
which is about to re-declare that Zionism is racism.
You will not be surprised if I would tell you that
the United States of America and the State of Israel
shall not attend and nor agree on its final resolution.
It is worth remembering how the USA was founded
because should you ask my opinion, I would say
" the White-man robbed the Red-man from his country
while the Black-man build a new country
for the White-man "
(does it not sound familiar ??)
As for Israel I would say :
"White-Jew robbed the Brown-Arabs from their country
while later the Brown-and-Black-jews
build a wall around it "
(does is not sound realistic ??)
Racism has no colour ,
but it happens that the White-colour
"gets dirty" very often........and very fast too.
In 1977 the UN general assembly has already declared
"Zionism is a form of racism"
but in 1992 George (Papa) Bush managed to retract this resolution.
I , personally , would like to ask all of you :
" If Zionism were not to be racism,
then what is still left over to be called: racism ?? "
Israel is not only "The only Democracy"
it is rather
"The only racist-regime in the Middle East"Sherlock Hommos
Racistologe
20.04.09
The writer asks “One wonders how the Apologizer-in-Chief would react.”, the apologizer is no body other then the new U.S. President. Barak Obama, who vowed to protect the security of the Zionist entity, and is over flooding it with U.S. taxpayer’s money, at a time when tens of thousands of American citizens are living in tents due to the financial crisis the U.S. which could be a byproduct of local Zionist financial acts!!!
It is again the old story of the dog that bites the same hand that feeds it and keeps it alive!!!
Adib S. Kawar
A victim of Zionism
Nb The reader is kindly requested to note the add that came with the article below Obama Plans to Punish Israel if it Attacks Iran, which is entitled “Help animals in shelters with one click the animal RESCUE SITE”, this is while this entity had been demolishing the houses of the indigenous Arab population of Palestine and depriving them of the shelters the built to protect them, which cost them their life time savings!!!
Zionism is racism
Fiery Spirited Zionist
Middle East news, information and pro-Israel commentary
The Animal Rescue Site
Sunday, April 19, 2009
The Obama administration continues with its perverse machinations. While coddling and befriending the world's dictators, it is acting to restrain Israel and treating it as an adversary. Instead of threatening Iran and N. Korea to end their nuclear programs, the Obama administration may impose sanctions on Israel or cut military aid should it dare to save itself from nuclear annihilation by attacking Iran preemtively.
There will be much wailing and gnashing of teeth on the part of Europe and the Obama administration when Israel is inevitably forced to strike Iran's nuclear facilities. But its their own cowardice which has forced Israel into a situation in which it must, on its own, confront Iran militarily or risk its annihilation. So the Obama gang and Europe have no business telling Israel to back off Iran and commit national suicide for their convenience.
US Weighing Punishing Israel if it Attacks Iran
Having taken military action against Iran off the table, the Obama administration is considering ways of punishing Israel if it attacks Iran to end its nuclear arms program (and prevent a second Holocaust).
In other words, having failed to contain Iran, the United States is concentrating on restraining Israel.
Administration contingency plans include condemnation of Israel, support for a United Nations Security Council resolution that could include sanctions on Israel, and suspending or seriously cutting military aid to the Jewish State.
One of President Obama's closest foreign policy advisers, National Security Council member Samantha Power, is a proponent of ending military aid to Israel in order to force it to negotiate with Iran's Palestinian Islamist proxy, Hamas, and withdraw from all lands taken during the Six-Day War of June 1967. Power also advocates shifting aid to a Palestinian state. Overall, she views Israel as a liability and a historic mistake, in line with the European left position (and that of old-line, right-of-center, American isolationists and anti-Semites). Her antidemocratic admirers in the Democratic Party's (Hillary-hating) left wing agree and are eager for an opportunity to paint Israel as a Jewish North Korea (although they actually have more sympathy for North Korea than for Israel).
The big question is how the Obama administration would react if Iran retaliated against Israel indirectly as well as directly--by making good on its repeated threats to attack U.S. forces in the Middle East and shut down the strategic, 29 mile-wide Strait of Hormuz, through which an estimated 20% of the world's crude oil is transported by tanker ships. Would the U.S. fight back with real ferocity or respond in a limited way while blaming Israel for preemptively attacking Iran and appealing to "the Muslim world" for "understanding?"
One wonders how the Apologizer-in-Chief would react.
Holocaust-denying Iran and its Lebanese Islamist Shiite proxy, the Hitlerian Hezbollah, have also vowed to "burn Tel Aviv" if attacked by either Israel or the U.S. Jerusalem's clerical fascist foes have amassed arsenals of ballistic missiles and rockets to bombard Tel Aviv and Haifa. Israel's political-military leadership must be taking this into consideration; a "six-hour war," designed to eliminate Iranian missile installations and nuclear sites could be the result.
Three decades of attempts to appease and accommodate Islamist Iran have led to the present countdown to conflict. Obama's so-called diplomatic surge--which transcends appeasement in downgrading and ultimately abandoning Israel in order to try to strike a "grand bargain" with Iran for pacification of the Middle East--has put Jerusalem on a political collision course with Washington.
No comments:
Post a Comment