This article originally appeared on the English-language website of PressTV.
There is a massive deception campaign in the US, and in its global
propaganda, which seeks to portray the United States as a poor set-upon nation
that would like world peace but just has to keep a military stationed around the
globe to “police” all the world’s “trouble spots.”
In fact, nothing could be further from the truth.
That truth is that the US is the biggest war-monger the world has ever
known.
Defending US empire around the globe at a cost of
$1.3 trillion a year
Let’s start with its budget. According to
research
by the War Resisters League, the US, in fiscal year 2012, budgeted a total
of $673 billion for the military, plus another $166 billion for military
activities of other government departments, such as the nuclear weapons program,
much of which is handled by the Department of Energy, or the Veterans Program,
which pays for the care and benefits of former military personnel. There’s also
another roughly $440 billion in interest paid on the debt from prior wars and
military expenditures. All together, that comes to $1.3 trillion, which
represents close to 50% of the general budget of the United States -- the
highest percentage of a government budget devoted to the military of any modern
nation in the world -- and perhaps of any government of any nation in the
world.
That spending represents also the world’s biggest percentage of national
gross domestic product devoted to the military (GDP is a measure of all economic
activity in a nation). Looking at the other countries with big militaries --
China, Russia, Britain and France -- not only does not one come even close in
terms of the percent of GDP spent on its military, but taken together, all of
their expenditures on their military combined total less than half what the US
spends by itself.
Since the late 1960s, the US government has engaged in a sleight-of-hand to
hide the scale of its military spending from the American people. It has done
this by adding to the federal budget the amount of money spent on Social
Security, the nation's retirement program, and Medicare, the health insurance
program for the elderly and disabled. This is not a correct accounting however,
because both of those programs are actually funded by a separate payroll tax
paid by employees and employers, and the resulting trust funds are actually
dedicated to the citizens who receive or will receive benefits from the
programs. Using that fraud, the government and the politicians are able to claim
that the US “only” spends 24% of the budget on military. Even that would be far
above what is spent by any other nation in the world, but it is actually only
half of what the US really spends as a share of its general budget.
One reason the US military budget is so huge is that the US operates some 900
bases abroad, in what amounts to a program of global empire. The organization
Foreign
Policy in Focus has estimated that the cost of keeping those bases operating
is about $250 billion. Empire costs a lot more than that though.There’s also the
cost of operating a global fleet of ships, including incredibly costly aircraft
carrier battle groups. That cost, surely in excess of $100 billion when the cost
of the ships is factored in, doesn’t get broken out by the Pentagon.
Then, there is another way the US is the world’s biggest war-monger. This is
in its role as the world’s biggest arms merchant. In 2011,
according
to reports, the US sold more than $66 billion in arms to the rest of the
world, often, as in the case of India and Pakistan, or India and China, or
Israel and Egypt and Saudi Arabia, selling weapons to countries that are
mutually hostile to each other or even, as in the case of India and Pakistan, in
a state of active conflict along their border. That $66 billion -- an all-time
record for the US -- was an astonishing and depressing 78 percent of the global
arms market for the year. Russia was the second biggest arms dealer, selling
only a paltry $4.8 billion in weapons to the rest of the world.
None of these weapons the US is selling makes either the US or the world any
safer.
Indeed, two of the biggest recipients of US military “aid” and weapons sales
are Saudi Arabia and Israel. The Saudi regime last year purchased $30 billion in
arms from the US that year. Meanwhile the US has been providing Israel with $3
billion in outright military aid each year for years. Israel also buys billions
of dollars in weapons from the US each year. Saudi Arabia is a dictatorship and
a promoter of instability within Syria, while it also props up dictatorships in
countries like Yemen and Bahrain. In other countries, like Israel or Colombia,
US aid encourages military actions which could lead to conflicts that would
inevitably draw the US in as a participant.
The truth is that none of America’s military spending makes the US safer.
While GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney, caught in some bizarre time warp,
may think Russia is America’s “biggest enemy,” the reality is that there is no
nation on earth that poses any military threat to the US itself, and to the
extent that terrorism might constitute a threat of some kind, America’s
trillion-dollar military is virtually useless against such small scale secret
actions, which call for a police response, not a carrier battle group or a
nuke.
There’s a good reason one doesn’t see fanatics traveling to Brazil or China
or New Zealand to blow things up: Those countries aren’t stationing their troops
within other countries’ borders, and aren’t selling weapons to countries that
threaten their neighbors.
The US government tells Americans that all that money they are spending on
the military is designed to “protect” them from harm. In fact, the evidence over
the years is that it is making Americans more vulnerable and less safe. Not only
that, but the wars that the US has started over the years -- in Indochina, in
Iraq, in Afghanistan and elsewhere --have led to the deaths of tens of thousands
of young Americans (and of course to the deaths of millions of people in those
countries, most of them civilians).
History has shown that a country that spends half of every tax dollar
collected from its citizens on its military cannot hope to prosper. As President
Dwight Eisenhower, a former top general in the US military who led US forces in
World War II, once famously stated in a 1953 address to a group of newspaper
editors:
“Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired
signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed,
those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money
alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists,
the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern
brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each
serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals.
It is some fifty miles of concrete pavement. We pay for a single fighter plane
with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new
homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people. This is, I repeat, the best
way of life to be found on the road the world has been taking. This is not a way
of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is
humanity hanging from a cross of iron.”
Most of the rest of the world isn’t fooled by American government accounting
tricks. Being at the barrel end of the gun, people of other countries know how
US military spending is a primary cause of war and terror in the world. But we
Americans ourselves need to wake up to the massive damage that our
military-obsessed political system is doing to our country, lest it ultimately
destroys us. There is a clear reason that social programs in the US are
threatened, that the economy is in a prolonged depression, that our education
system is collapsing, and that our standing in the world has plummeted. It is
our militarism, and the incredible amount of the national wealth that is being
spent on it.
River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!
No comments:
Post a Comment