Search This Blog

Loading...

Thursday, January 7, 2010

Galloway: I ask Arabs from Marrakish to Bahrain to stand up

Galloway Video






River to Sea
Uprooted Palestinian

Gaza Freedom March marches in Cairo against blockade


The Electronic Intifada

Sharat G. Lin, The Electronic Intifada, 6 January 2010

Members of the Gaza Freedom March stage a sit-in outside the French Embassy in Cairo, 30 December 2009. (Mashahed)

The international delegation of the Gaza Freedom March originally planned to arrive in Gaza on 29 December 2009 to join a march against the Israeli blockade together with residents of Gaza two days later. Instead, most of its delegates remained in Cairo, having been blocked from going to the Rafah border by the Egyptian government, and instead marched against the Egyptian blockade on Gaza.

The Gaza Freedom March sought to highlight the plight of the 1.5 million residents of Gaza on the first anniversary of Israel's invasion last winter. They hoped to enter the densely-populated Palestinian territory with humanitarian aid for water purification, school materials, medicines and other much needed supplies. Following Hamas' electoral victory in the January 2006 election, Israel began tightening its blockade on Gaza. The blockade was strengthened after Hamas took control of the territory amidst factional fighting with the rival Fatah party. In addition, Egypt has refused to give permission for foreign citizens to enter Gaza through Rafah until the last minute. Organizers of the Gaza Freedom March hoped to obtain permission to enter Gaza, but were disappointed when Egypt closed the Rafah border in December 2009 under intense pressure from Israel.

The French ambassador to Egypt, Jean Felix-Paganon, told members of the French delegation of the Gaza Freedom March that the Egyptian government was preparing to grant permission for the march to proceed to Gaza until the deal was rejected by Israel. With 1,360 delegates from 43 countries converging on Cairo, Egypt revoked the permit to hold a large meeting in Cairo as well as the permits for buses to take them to the Rafah border via the northern Sinai town of al-Arish.

Protesting the Egyptian blockade

In response, the Gaza Freedom March launched protests in the streets of Cairo on 27 December 2009. The day began with a silent action, tying letter cards expressing solidarity to the people of Gaza to the railings of the Qasr al-Nil Bridge. Many Egyptian passersby stopped to add their own messages of friendship to the people of Gaza and Palestine. When police finally broke up the vigil, they ripped the cards off, leaving only the strings by which they were attached.

In the late afternoon, a plan to sail in dozens of traditional Nile sailboats called feluccas was aborted by police, who closed off an entire section of the Corniche al-Nil where the feluccas are docked. The purpose of going onto the Nile River was to float 1,400 candles in biodegradable cups in memory of the Palestinians who died in the Israel assault one year ago. Instead, Gaza Freedom March delegates held their candlelight along the busy Corniche al-Nil street.

The more than 300-strong French delegation had gathered in front of the French Embassy in Giza, expecting to board buses for al-Arish. When the buses failed to arrive because their permits were pulled by the Egyptian authorities, the delegates in a courageous act of defiance sat down in the busy four northbound lanes of Murad Street and set up tents. Hundreds of riot police from Egypt's notoriously brutal Central Security Forces were mobilized to enclose the protesters and move them onto the footpath in front of the French Embassy. At one point the security force cordon increased to three layers. However, the French ambassador was apparently supportive, discouraging Egyptian authorities from using force and pressing for permits to travel to Gaza. Eventually the security cordon was relaxed, allowing anyone to freely enter and exit the encampment. The encampment lasted continuously for four days.

Other large delegations including those from the US, Canada, Britain and Italy, approached their own embassies to appeal for support in pressuring the Egyptian government to open the Gaza border. The US and Canadian embassies were particularly unhelpful because their governments had taken an official position of not dealing with Gaza because they classify Hamas as a "terrorist" organization. An additional special delegation went to the offices of the Arab League to seek its intervention.

Nonviolent civil disobedience

When the Egyptian government revoked the permit for Gaza Freedom March delegates to meet in Le College de la Sainte Famille (a famous Jesuit school), organizers defiantly moved the meeting into the open, directly under the nose of the state in the plaza in front of al-Mogama, the monolithic state office building that houses the public entry point into much of the central government bureaucracy. Police quickly moved in to try to stop the assembly, demanding, "Stop it! Stop it! This is not allowed!" Delegates then burst into signing, and the police reluctantly melted away into the shadows of the crowd.

Meanwhile, other Gaza Freedom March participants defied the lack of permits to travel to al-Arish. Thirty arrived successfully and checked into a hotel, after which they were placed under house arrest. After diplomatic negotiations, they were allowed out of the hotel, but blocked from going to the Rafah border. Over several days another 50 delegates boarded commercial buses at different times in Cairo and successfully passed through the multiple checkpoints outside of Cairo and along the highway from Port Said to al-Arish. However, they were all halted at the bus stand in al-Arish or at the final checkpoint before entering the town. Police forced all foreign travelers, including those holding Palestinian passports, back to Cairo (or at least up to the Suez Canal) under police escort. Eight Europeans refused to go back, choosing instead to camp out at a checkpoint. A subsequent directive from the Ministry of Interior blocked all non-Egyptians from traveling east of the Suez Canal.

On 28 December, while negotiations continued with the Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs for permits to enter Gaza, a new avenue was opened through the United Nations office in Cairo. A negotiating team led by Philippine parliament member Walden Bello met with UN officials, but to no avail. Bello confided, "I know it's a bit difficult right now with the situation here, but I don't think they will be able to keep us away from [Gaza] forever."

The negotiating team was supported by nearly a thousand delegates rallying in front of the Cairo World Trade Center where the UN office is located. The scene was abuzz for hours with chants of "We want to go to Gaza," "Free Gaza," "We shall overcome," and many more. There was music led by guitarists and an accordion player. Meanwhile, organizing meetings of the various national delegations were constantly going on in the background.

Eighty-five-year-old Holocaust survivor Hedy Epstein used the occasion to announce her hunger strike to demand passage to Gaza. She explained, "I have come to a point in my life in regard to the Israeli-Palestinian issue, especially the Gaza issue, where I think I need to do something else because what I have done so far has not really caught the attention of my own government or the governments of the world who are silent on this issue. And so I've decided to go on a hunger strike." She was quickly joined by others.

As at the French Embassy, the rally was visually contained by a solid wall of black-uniformed members of the Egyptian Central Security Force. But the wall could not hide the banners, Palestinian flags and chants that flew high above the security cordon. The young recruits frequently expressed sympathy and smiles with the delegates. One symbolically crossed his wrists, signaling that his hands were tied. The Central Security Force recruits carried no arms, and have not done so ever since a 1987 mutiny. However, police (some of whom are armed) did filter the crowd and remove three Egyptian nationals. They also removed one Palestinian-American woman, punched her in the face, and then released her. Twelve international delegates remained camped at the World Trade Center overnight.

Many Egyptian passersby and individuals in buses and cars also signaled their sympathy by waving to the delegates, for the Gaza Freedom March was exercising a limited freedom of assembly and speech accorded to internationals that would not be permitted among Egyptians.

On 29 December, the Syndicate of Journalists invited the Gaza Freedom March to join their members at their trade union headquarters for a rally for Gaza that lasted into the evening. The combined voices of Egyptians and internationals sent a powerful message of unity and solidarity on Palestine and opposition to the Egyptian government's role in upholding the blockade on Gaza.

Divisive breakthrough

CODEPINK organizer Jodie Evans used her personal contact with Suzanne Mubarak, wife of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, and chairwoman of the Egyptian Red Crescent, to appeal for permission for the Gaza Freedom March to carry its humanitarian aid into Gaza. The response from Suzanne Mubarak's office was positive with instructions to "help in any way possible." After reviewing the details of the request, by the next day Suzanne Mubarak secured permission for 100 delegates and two buses to cross into Gaza on the morning of 30 December. CODEPINK organizers were given only two hours to come up with a list of names.

The initial acceptance of the offer proved to be tactically divisive for both the Gaza Freedom March and for the Egyptian government. After raging internal arguments and calls by Palestinians for "all or none," the Gaza Freedom March belatedly, but wisely, decided to decline the offer and allow only Palestinians with family in Gaza, key media personnel such as the team from teleSUR television and a handful of individuals to deliver humanitarian aid to board the buses. Meanwhile, Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit tried to drive a wedge through the Gaza Freedom March by praising those selected (falsely as if by the government) to go to Gaza as "good and sincere," while denouncing those remaining in Cairo as "hooligans" "acting against Egyptian interests." However, that divide-and-rule tactic only served to unify delegates.

Free Gaza Square

On 31 December -- the day of the actual Gaza Freedom March -- delegates in Cairo planned to symbolically "march to Gaza" by walking peacefully in the streets of downtown Cairo. But because of the official ban on public political demonstrations, organizers adopted the tactic of initiating the march with "flash mob" and "swarm of bees" techniques. It worked for only about 20 minutes before the "swarm" became trapped between the traffic and hundreds of police.

In the ensuing melee, a solid wall of Central Security officers first began pushing demonstrators away from trapped buses, while their counterparts attempted to ram the human wall from behind. Once the buses were cleared out of the way, uniformed Egyptian police began grabbing delegates and throwing them onto the footpath. Some officers used fists to hit delegates, including several women. Two reported that their headscarves were ripped off. Seven delegates were reportedly injured. One American man had blood on his face that required treatment at the medical station set up by march organizers. He had been clubbed with a two-way radio by a plainclothes police officer.

Once confined to a 500-square-meter area of footpath, Gaza Freedom March delegates erected banners and Palestinian flags, and proclaimed the site "Free Gaza Square." Within its confines they spoke about the political accomplishments of the week, and the unfinished tasks ahead. Challenged by the lack of democratic rights in Egypt, delegates were more determined than ever to break the siege of Gaza and challenge their governments' acquiescence to the blockade.

Ali Abunimah, a cofounder of The Electronic Intifada and a delegate to the march, observed that "Gaza is harder to visit than a prison.... It is too bad we didn't get into Gaza. But the most important thing is that Al-Jazeera has carried it [Gaza Freedom March protests in Cairo] throughout the Arab world."

Late in the evening, hundreds of Gaza Freedom March delegates gathered once again in the open plaza in front of al-Mogama to hold a candlelight vigil to celebrate the new year. They held candles and arranged more candles on the pavement to create the luminous word "Gaza" within a circle. Individuals spontaneously began passing out sweets. The novelty of this action was immensely popular with Egyptian passersby who joined in the hundreds, swelling the crowd. Then plainclothes police moved in to filter out and sweep away all Egyptian nationals. A double-row contingent of the Central Security Force also moved in, until senior commanders were told to back off, removing the contingent to a distant corner of the plaza. The state itself held no official new year festivity, as if fearing that it would turn into a spontaneous protest for Gaza and against the policies of the Mubarak regime.

The Cairo Declaration

The Gaza Freedom March concluded with three important events. First, it convened an ad hoc convention to ratify the "Cairo Declaration" jammed into a small hotel restaurant. In a move spearheaded by the South African delegation, an international working committee drafted a document putting forth a globally-unified plan of action for boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israeli apartheid and "to compel Israel to comply with international law." With the concurrence of civil society representatives in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, the document reaffirms commitments to "(1) Palestinian self-determination, (2) ending the occupation, (3) equal rights for all within historic Palestine, and (4) the full right of return for Palestinian refugees." The historic document includes 128 initial signatories from 16 countries.

Second, the Gaza Freedom March hunger strikers held a press conference at the Syndicate of Journalists to conclude the official hunger strike, although a few vowed to continue their hunger strikes until they returned to their home cities. Over the course of the hunger strike, the number of participants had swollen to 27. Hedy Epstein said that she felt "strengthened" by her actions seeking justice for the people of Gaza.

There was the usual Central Security Force cordon. But it was plainclothes police that disconnected and took down the Al-Jazeera video camera and escorted the cameraman away from the scene. In previous incidents during the Gaza Freedom March, three Egyptian journalists were arrested for photographing demonstrations, and one was arrested while conducting an interview of a Gaza Freedom March delegate. One Egyptian photojournalist even asked me to send him a photograph, saying that "I would be arrested for taking photographs of the demonstrations. Egypt is no democracy."

Third, a flash mob demonstration was organized in the afternoon in front of the high-rise building housing the Israeli Embassy. Demonstrators rapidly appeared from the south side of the traffic circle between the University Bridge and the Giza Zoo. For at least ten minutes, demonstrators swarmed throughout the crossroads and the end of the bridge before Central Security Force personnel in riot gear arrived to move them onto a narrow strip on the south side of the bridge opposite the embassy. While there was little police intimidation inside the security cordon, aggressive harassment by plainclothes police outside the cordon was particularly severe. One French cameraman was physically threatened on the University Bridge even as he was walking away from the demonstration and showing his French passport.

Shortcomings and accomplishments

Mass media coverage of the Gaza Freedom March in Cairo reached around the world, even though many major western media networks refused give more than cursory attention. In Egypt, the events received front-page coverage in opposition newspapers like al-Wafd, al-Sharouq, al-Dastur, and the independent newspapers al-Masri al-Youm and Daily News Egypt. But newspapers like the semi-official, al-Ahram, and government-owned al-Akhbar and al-Gumhuriya ignored the events as if they did not exist. Yet even the pro-government Egyptian Gazette could not avoid publishing a front-page photo of the demonstration at the Israeli Embassy. hile avoiding day-to-day coverage, al-Arabi and al-Karama end up splashing headline photos of the Gaza Freedom March activities in their weekend editions.

Except for the Syndicate of Journalists, the relative absence of Egyptian participation and solidarity with the Gaza Freedom March could have been interpreted by delegates as the result of either severe political repression or political indifference. But anti-government Egyptian activists pointed out that Gaza Freedom March organizers failed to reach out to them and establish coordination. In fact, Egyptian labor unions, students and organizations of civil society have a long history of struggle in the streets of Cairo and other towns for democratic rights in the face of the overwhelming force of the state apparatus. Yet six full days of political demonstrations in Cairo by a large group of visiting internationals is without historical precedent.

The struggles in Cairo and the new construction of a steel wall deep into the earth at the Rafah border highlights Egyptian complicity with the siege on Gaza and deference to US foreign policy dictates in the region. Although delegates of the Gaza Freedom March were defeated in their desire to travel to Gaza, as a result of the struggles in the streets and embassies of Cairo, they were more determined than ever that the blockade of Gaza by both Israel and Egypt must be lifted. Bitur Nabi Tammam of Bahrain saw the bright side, "Even if they don't allow us to cross, I think it has accomplished the purpose that from all over the world you see people left their families, left their homes, to come here to say 'freedom for Gaza,' 'freedom for Palestine,' 'open the gates!'"

Sharat G. Lin is president of the San Jose Peace and Justice Center.

Galloway: More convoys expected from Venezuela, South Africa, Malaysia



[ 07/01/2010 - 10:18 AM ]

GAZA, (PIC)-- British MP George Galloway has vowed that more aid convoys would be organized for Gaza from Venezuela, South Africa and Malaysia.

Speaking at a program for Al-Jazeera TV on Wednesday night, he said that the Venezuelan and South African presidents would head their countries' convoys while former Malaysian premier Mahathir Mohammed would head his country's aid convoy.

Galloway lashed out at the Egyptian authorities for assaulting members of the Lifeline-3 convoy in El-Arish just for bringing food and medicine to the besieged people of Gaza.

The Egyptian authorities promised to allow the convoy to enter Gaza through El-Arish harbor but they did not live up to their promises on the contrary they "besieged us, they locked us up, they betrayed us", he said.

The MP described El-Arish incidents as a "shame on Egypt", expressing conviction that 80% of the Egyptian people do not approve the way his convoy was treated.

He recalled that other convoys were treated in similar ways, adding that Egypt was playing the role of dividing the Arab world.

Galloway described statements by the Egyptian foreign ministry spokesman Husam Zaki in which he said that the convoy members did not abide by the Egyptian instructions as "Sheer lies".

River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

Turks Protest Egypt’s Attack on Viva Palestina


Link

Wed, 06 Jan 2010
Thousands of angry protesters in Turkey have staged a demonstration in the city of Istanbul to condemn the Egyptian police crackdown on a Gaza-bound aid convoy.
At least 55 people were injured in clashes that broke out between riot police and Viva Palestina activists at the Egyptian port of El-Arish on Tuesday, after Egypt said it would not allow 59 trucks for the relief convoy to enter the blockaded Gaza Strip.
Following the incident, Turkish protesters poured into streets and assembled in front of the Egyptian consulate in Istanbul on Wednesday.
They carried flags of Palestine and chanted slogans in condemnation of Cairo’s use of force against the human rights activists and Israel’s ongoing siege of the Palestinian coastal enclave.
Led by British politician George Galloway, Viva Palestina has over 200 vehicles laden with basic food items and medical supplies, and is set to break Israel’s months-long closure of the Gaza Strip.
Earlier, Cairo had said it would only permit 157 members of the convoy to drive to Gaza, but later agreed to allow the group’s 400 volunteers to enter the impoverished Palestinian territory.
The Egyptian government’s denial of entry for Viva Palestina trucks came despite talks in which a delegation of Turkish lawmakers sought to convince Cairo officials to open its border to Gaza for the aid convoy.
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=115475&sectionid=351020204
Source: PRESSTV
If you liked this post, then…
January 6, 2010 Posted by Elias

River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

Israel’s Iron Kipa by Gilad Atzmon

River to Sea
 


In English they call it the “Iron Dome” in Hebrew they call it the “Iron Kipa” which could also be translated as ‘Iron Skullcap’ or even ‘Iron Yarmulka’*. Seemingly the Israelis love to mix iron with God.
The Iron Dome, Kipa or Yarmulka is the new Israeli guided missile system. It is there to stop rain of rockets from falling over Sderot, Ashkelon or Tel Aviv. According to Haaretz, “the defense establishment this week successfully intercepted a barrage of rockets for the first time using the newly developed Iron Dome system”.
The new Israeli invention uses small guided missiles to blow up Katyusha-style rockets. Israel plans to station the first working unit outside the Gaza Strip next year.
I can only praise the Israelis and their scientists for their creative imagination and their survival instincts. It is possible that this ‘Iron Dome’ is exactly what we need in order to turn Israel and Zionism into history once and for all.
The tactic is very simple indeed: while mortar shells cost just a few dollars, guided missiles cost many thousands more. While Palestinian mortar barrages can be launched from every corner in occupied Palestine, Israel will have to deploy its newly invented Iron Kipa over its borders and around its towns. Every home-made Palestinian mortar shell or Qassam Rocket could easily exhaust the Israeli economy and the military's human resources. Moreover, from now on, thanks to the Iron Kipa, the war with the Palestinian resistance can take place in the sky rather than in Palestinian cities and villages.
But there is one more hidden implication entangled with the new kosher defense system. If the Israelis do possess the means to protect themselves from Palestinian mortars and any ballistic capacity, then Israel cannot justify its occupation of the West Bank any more. Haaretz has described it in very clear words. “Iron Dome's success” says the Israeli paper, “could improve the prospects of Israel eventually ceding the West Bank land to the Palestinians, as Israeli officials have said that any withdrawals should be conditional on the deployment of a reliable defense against rocket attacks.”
It seems as if the Israelis are really excelling in shooting themselves in the foot. Don’t ever under estimate the Zionist brilliance and Israeli innovation in particular. Once again the Israeli engineers proved that they know how to transform the Kipa into Iron and vice versa.
*Yarmulka - a skullcap worn by religious Jews (especially at prayer)

35 Palestinians wounded by Egyptian security forces near Salahuddin terminal


[ 06/01/2010 - 05:39 PM ]


GAZA, (PIC)-- Palestinian medical sources have reported that 35 Palestinian citizens were wounded by Egyptian gunfire Wednesday evening when dozens of them rallied near Salahuddin terminal in Rafah area in protest at the Egyptian authorities’ attack on Viva Palestina convoy activists.

The sources told the Palestinian information center (PIC) that five citizens, who were transferred to Abu Yousuf Al-Najjar hospital, are in very critical conditions.

Eyewitness said the protesters responded to the source of fire by throwing stones at the Egyptian side and shouted slogans hostile to Egypt before Gaza policemen showed up and dispersed the crowds.

About 55 multinational activists, participating in the third Lifeline convoy organized by Britain-based Viva Palestina organization, sustained different injuries during clashes with Egyptian security forces in Al-Arish area.

In the same context, the Palestinian resistance factions in Gaza organized on Wednesday afternoon a massive sit-in near Salahuddin terminal in Rafah to denounce Egypt for preventing international activists and aid convoys from entering Gaza.

All factions strongly condemned the brutal attacks carried out by the Egyptian security forces against Viva Palestina activists who brought with them humanitarian aid to the besieged Gaza people.

Hamas lawmaker Mushir Al-Masri stressed during the sit-in that the Gaza people would not care about all attempts to make them preoccupied with minor issues and divert their attention from the real threat to the Arab national security.

Masri also urged the Egyptian people to rise and force their government to stop the building of the steel wall and open the Rafah border crossing permanently.

For its part, the government committee to break the siege strongly denounced the Egyptian authorities for using excessive force against Viva Palestina activists.

In a statement, the committee said that the Egyptian security forces created a serious precedent in dealing with aid convoys sent to Gaza.

It added that dealing with activists, who traveled thousands of miles and were warmly welcomed by all countries they crossed, in such a savage way undermine Egypt’s stature in the Arab and Muslim worlds.

Hamas lawmaker Yahya Al-Abadsa also slammed in a press release the attack on the activists as a shameful act and a crime in every sense of the word against Palestine.

Abadsa underlined that such behavior made the Egyptian regime a servant of the American policy and a dirty hand used for repression.

In another press release, the Islamic Jihad Movement expressed its dismay and shock at the Egyptian authorities’ attitude towards the Viva Palestina aid convoy and its insistence on placing obstacles on its way and prevent it from helping the besieged Palestinian people in Gaza.

In a related development, deputy head of the international committee to end the siege Mohamed Sawalha told Wednesday Al-Quds satellite channel that a number of Turkish lawmakers are mediating between the organizers of Viva Palestina convoy and Egyptian officials.

Sawalha added that the mediation is aimed to overcome the problems raised by Egypt’s breach of a previous agreement it reached with Viva Palestina at the port of Aqaba in which it pledged to facilitate the entry of the convoy into Gaza through Al-Arish port.


River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

year after losing a father and sons, a Gaza family copes

 Link
Rami Almeghari writing from the occupied Gaza Strip, Live from Palestine, 6 January 2010




Khaled Abu Jbarah with baby Lina and Jihad, whose father was killed in an Israeli missile strike on their Gaza home. (Rami Almeghari)

"Four months after the martyrdom of my husband and two of my sons, my granddaughter Lina was born -- the daughter of my martyred son Basel," said Fathiya Abu Jbarah. Fathiya is the widow of Jihad Abu Jbarah and mother of Basil, 30, and Usama, 21 who were killed on 4 January 2009 by an Israeli missile that struck their home in al-Bureij refugee camp in the central Gaza Strip. Their home was hit during Israel's 22-day air and land attack that killed more than 1,400 persons and wounded thousands of others.

The Electronic Intifada visited the family a few days after the attack (see "Targeting a cup of tea in Gaza," 12 January 2009) and came back one year later to see how they are coping.

Reflecting on the birth of Basel's daughter Lina, Fathiya Abu Jbarah said, "My heart almost popped. What did this innocent baby do to be born without a father?"

"We Palestinian mothers like any other mothers, never want to see our children and grandchildren become orphans or for wives to become widows," Fathiya who is in her mid-50s, said as she carried Lina in her arms. "We want to live in peace as any other nation in this world. Yet, the Israeli occupation never leaves us alone, they have continued to attack us regularly for decades now. Isn't it time for us to live normally?"

In addition to the killings of Jihad and his two sons, a fourth family member, Khaled, 19, suffered severe shrapnel wounds to his abdomen and arms, and was transferred to a hospital in Saudi Arabia for treatment.

Khaled recalled the moment, just before 10:30pm on 4 January 2009, when the missiles struck the house. He had been sitting outside with his father and brothers. However, Khaled said, "The weather was cold, so I went in my room, while my brothers and father were keeping warm outside in front of a wood stove."

Khaled then heard missiles striking near the home and rushed out of his room to see what happened. "I saw the three [Jihad, Basel and Usama] dismembered by the strike, but I did not know I was also hit." Khaled recalled going out of the house to a nearby hospital.

The family's rented home was badly damaged in the Israeli attack, but now they live in a newly-built three-room house. Khaled now lives there along with his brother Muhammad and other family members including a teenage brother, his mother, his sister-in-law, the widow of Basil and other nieces and nephews.

The Abu Jbarah home is one of the very few to be built in the past year, as thousands of homes damaged or destroyed in the Israeli attack remain unrepaired. Virtually no building supplies have come in due to the ongoing Israeli blockade, but the Abu Jbarahs built the house with the help of friends and family, and using building supplies smuggled in through tunnels from Egypt, and sold at inflated prices.

Muhammad Abu Jbarah, 24, explained that his late father had decided to build a family home in 2006, but due to the blockade he could never get the raw materials, which is why he rented the home that was attacked by Israel last year. After the attack, the family lived for months at the home of a relative, but with their needs, they decided to build the new house. It has been an enormous struggle.

"We have been building this new house for almost eight months, trying to get use of any raw building material available in local markets," Muhammad explained. The cost has been enormous -- about $70,000, much of which was borrowed from relatives or friends. "We owe about 70 percent of that amount," said Muhammad," and it will take us at least six or seven years to pay it off, but we have no choice."

Despite the agony he has endured during the past year, Khaled Abu Jbarah sounded hopeful and looked forward to a better life in the new year. "I do look forward to a better situation, not only for me but also for these little children. We Palestinians want to live in peace and tranquility for generations to come, but unfortunately, every generation of us experiences the same suffering at the hands of this occupation, which never abides by ceasefire declarations, peace agreements, or any other international resolutions."

Although the situation has been generally calm, Khaled pointed out that the "Israeli army continues to open fire from time to time [and] some people have been killed and wounded recently."

The home provides some comfort now, but Fathiya Abu Jbarah said, "what you see can never compensate me for my loss. During Ramadan I cried a lot for my dear husband and children, while serving iftar [the fast-breaking meal] to the rest of my family." As she spoke, the memory brought the tears back to her eyes.

Rami Almeghari is a journalist and university lecturer based in the Gaza Strip.
River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

Deconstructing Simon Wiesenthal by Lawrence Swaim


Link

Wednesday, January 6, 2010 at 8:52AM Gilad Atzmon
http://mondoweiss.net


The Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles, California, is named after the famed Austrian Nazi-hunter, Simon Wiesenthal, a connection that turns out to be appropriate in disturbing but unexpected ways. That is, both Simon Wiesenthal and the Center named after him have been accused of flagrant lying, exaggerations and half-truths. Wiesenthal’s confabulations were never a matter of published discourse among scholars, so far as this writer can determine, nor were they popular knowledge until quite recently. In any case, it is now known that Wiesenthal, a born story-teller, rarely let the facts get in the way of a good story—in fact many of the things he claimed to have done were fabrications. This recently came to light with the publication, in June of 2009, of Hunting Evil, by British Author Guy Walters, in which he characterizes Simon Wiesenthal as “a liar—and a bad one at that.” Wiesenthal, he maintains, would “concoct outrageous stories about his war years and make false claims about his academic career.” Walters found that there were “so many inconsistencies between his three main memoirs and between those memoirs and contemporaneous documents, that it is impossible to establish a reliable narrative from them. Wiesenthal’s scant regard for the truth makes it possible to doubt everything he ever wrote or said.”1

The Wiener Library, one of the world’s oldest and most reputable institutions for the study of the Holocaust, has endorsed this revaluation of Wiesenthal. That is interesting because one assumes that they, like many others in the field of Holocaust Studies, may have been aware for some time that there were problems with Wiesenthal’s resume. The Wiener Library’s Director Ben Barkow concluded that “accepting that Wiesenthal was a showman and a braggart and, yes, even a liar, can live alongside acknowledging the contribution he made.”

Daniel Finkelstein, grandson of the Wiener Library’s founder, had this to say in an August 2009 article in the London Times about Guy Walters’ Hunting Evil: “Walters’s documentary evidence on Wiesenthal’s inconsistencies and lies is impeccable. He shows how the Nazi hunter’s accounts of his wartime experiences are contradictory and implausible. He demonstrates that he had no role, contrary to his own assertion, in the capture of Adolf Eichmann. He pitilessly dissects Wiesenthal’s overblown claims about the number he brought to justice, suggesting it was not much more than a handful.”2

So what is the truth about Simon Wiesenthal? Born in 1908 in Galicia, Wiesenthal attended the Czech Technical University in Prague in 1929, where he had a reputation as a gifted raconteur. (Walters says he appeared as “a stand-up comedian,” which could be a British approximation of the cabaret theatre popular at that time.) Wiesenthal claimed to have graduated from Czech Technical, but records show that he didn’t. He also maintained that he studied at Lwow Polytechnic in Galicia in 1935, but there is no record of him ever attending classes there. Wiesenthal likewise claimed to have operated his own architectural office and built elegant villas, but again Polish records do not support this. Instead he appears to have worked as a supervisor in a Lviv furniture factory from 1935 until 1939, a somewhat more mundane occupation, and one that Wiesenthal himself acknowledged before he became a famous celebrity in Vienna.

During the Second World War, Wiesenthal was apprehended by the Nazis, and was in at least six different Nazi camps. For reasons unknown, however, he claimed later to have been in 13 of them. This raises the question that must inevitably come up when contemplating Wiesenthal’s stories about himself. Being in a single Nazi camp would clearly be a horrific, mind-blowing experience, much less being in six of them. (This writer cannot confirm which ones were death camps and which ones labor or concentration camps.) So why did Wiesenthal feel it necessary to inflate the number of camps he’d been in to 13, particularly since such claims were likely to be checked later?

Part of the answer seems to be that Wiesenthal was a natural-born confabulator and liar who had a powerful need to create the persona of a superhero. But that alone does not explain his behavior. The Holocaust raises questions about human nature, and there is a demand for accounts that can explain, rationalize, and create a moral context for it. Wiesenthal offered people a plausible narrative with a moral framework: Nazis incarcerated him; he miraculously escaped; he now tracked them down. The systemic evil of the Holocaust was so huge and so threatening that it could be successfully addressed only by a superman whose capacity to survive evil and punish transgressors was larger than life. Wiesenthal was acutely aware of this; and his heart-stopping accounts of last-minutes escapes from the Nazis played to this anxiety. And the fact that he was bringing masses of Nazi war criminals to justice was the happy ending to the success story, the kind peopled wanted to hear; but as Walters demonstrates in Hunting Evil, at least one of Wiesenthal’s accounts of last-minute escapes from the Nazis can be shown to be a fabrication, and others are questionable.

After the war, Wiesenthal founded two organizations that sought to collect and centralize information on Nazi war criminals at large. Sometimes these war criminals were “hiding in plain sight,” in the sense that governments knew where they were but lacked the political will to arrest them. The main function of Wiesenthal’s organizations, then, was to keep the issue current in the public eye—and he had the kind of personality, and the public relations skills, to do just that. This is the real reason for Wiesenthal’s notoriety. The organizations set up by Wiesenthal were research organizations, and had no real investigative functions, such as law enforcement might have, and no power to arrest people. Guy Walters concludes (correctly, in my opinion) that the disinterestedness of western governments in hunting down Nazi criminals was far more repugnant morally than Wiesenthal’s experiments with the truth. That said, the fact that Wiesenthal told so many unnecessary lies, and that people who might have suspected this said nothing to challenge them, is one more example of the Holocaust’s ability to corrupt.

Although Wiesenthal claimed to have brought over a thousand Nazi criminals to justice, he generated information leading to the arrest of less than a hundred at most. His most outrageous claim was that he participated in the tracking down of Adolf Eichmann. This was, and remains, a falsehood—the tracking and kidnapping of Eichmann was the work of Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, and Wiesenthal’s involvement was limited to passing on whatever information he had to them. This inconvenient reality was widely known—certainly it was known to Mossad, which despised and resented Wiesenthal’s self-serving stories—but apparently few people were willing to question Wiesenthal’s many claims.

Except in Austria, that is, where Wiesenthal was for a long time a controversial figure. It the 1970s, Wiesenthal publicly berated Austrian Prime Minister Bruno Kreisky for having so many ex-Nazis in his cabinet—and in this, Wiesenthal was undoubtedly right. The controversy he stirred up was especially important because Austrians had, up to that time, generally avoided much public discussion about their own responsibility for Nazi crimes; and Wiesenthal may have welcomed the opportunity to open up this issue when he made his sensational—but accurate—accusations about Kreisky’s cabinet choices. Kreisky, a Jewish Social Democrat, hinted that Wiesenthal had survived the war only because he collaborated with the Gestapo; but Wiesenthal sued for libel and won. Wiesenthal also drew fire for emphasizing that others besides Jews died in the gas chambers, which brought him into conflict with Elie Wiesel, who took the view that the Holocaust should be seen as an exclusively Jewish event. Some of Wiesenthal’s ideas were good ones—how ironic, then, that his ideas were given serious consideration only because of the rough-and-tumble public persona that Wiesenthal had invented for himself as part of his entrepreneurial and overly-imaginative self-promotion as a swashbuckling Nazi-hunter.

Wiesenthal received practically every honor known to the 20th century, over 100 of them. Mainly because of his own self-promotion, Wiesenthal became much more than an author with some dubious and not particularly well-written books—he became a secular saint. But of what secular religion was Saint Wiesenthal the exemplar? The trouble with Wiesenthal was not his extraordinary efforts to focus public attention on Nazi criminals—the problem was, and is, that his accounts of his own experiences were never challenged by people who professed to have an interest in historical truth. His addiction to confabulation made him a prisoner of what Norman Finkelstein has called The Holocaust Industry, which we may describe as the systematic use of the Holocaust for personal and organizational gain.

We are left with the sense that perhaps some who noticed discrepancies in Wiesenthal’s books said nothing because they were afraid of being denounced as anti-Semites. Author Guy Walters refers to this in his July 2009 article in the Sunday Times. “Some may feel I am too harsh on [Wiesenthal] and that I run a professional danger in seemingly allying myself with a vile host of neo-Nazis, revisionists, Holocaust deniers and anti-Semites. I belong firmly outside any of these squalid camps and it is my intention to wrestle criticism of Wiesenthal away from their clutches. His figure is a complex and important one. If there was a motive for his duplicity, it may well have been rooted in good intentions.” Guy Walters made this caveat a month after his book came out last summer; the fact that he made it at all indicates the sensitivity with which a professional historian must approach anything having to do with the Holocaust.

In fact, the appearance of Walters’ book has some of the characteristics of a literary campaign, although not necessarily of pre-arrangement. Walters’ Hunting Evil was published in Britain on June 18, 2009, at the beginning of last summer. A month later, in July, an article by Walters appeared in the Sunday Times, which set forth his reasons for revealing Wiesenthal’s duplicities. (One might think that because something is true might be reason enough for a historian to reveal it.) In August, 2009, a month later, Daniel Finkelstein’s supportive review appears in the Jewish Chronicle, validating Walters’ research. Finkelstein’s review was pivotal, since—as the grandson of the founder of the world’s oldest library on Holocaust history—he is assumed to speak with an authority that others lack, including perhaps Guy Walters himself.

That is not to say that the above was part of a coordinated campaign. Walters wrote on his website that he does not know Finkelstein, and based on internal evidence this writer believes that to be true. It simply indicates how complicated telling the truth can become when one writes about the Holocaust, and how important it is for many historians to carefully consider the public-relations angle before revealing things that might make people uncomfortable. In Guy Walters’ case, he received support for his findings from a man whose credentials in Holocaust Studies cannot be challenged. (There is at least one new book about Wiesenthal coming out soon, which after the Walters’ revelations will almost surely be forced to deal with obvious discrepancies in Wiesenthal’s narrative.)

There is ongoing fallout to the Walters’ book in other areas. On November 26, 2009, there appeared a sensational Associated Press report (carried on Walters’ website) that 12 members of the 15 member international advisory board of the Vienna Wiesenthal Institute for Holocaust Studies have resigned, apparently after a hysterical uproar about the availability of research material to scholars. (The AP report gives as the reason for the international hullabaloo certain objections by scholars “that restrictions on access to files made independent research impossible.”) Inevitably, one of those involved in the AP report warned that unrestricted access to the Institute’s files might encourage “holocaust deniers.” The opposite seems much more likely. The longer people hide the truth about Wiesenthal, the more doubts it will create about how objectively historians are able to write about the Holocaust.

Beginning with the publication in 1961 of Raul Hilberg’s The Destruction of the European Jews, people on the Left, political and cultural progressives, and some psychologists sought to deconstruct the Holocaust so that they could learn how systemic evil operates. If the Shoah was history’s greatest crime, why not try to understand how it happened, so such crimes could be thwarted in the future? That was the right approach to take, but it quickly led to a kind of truth that many people did not want to accept—that there is a Nazi in every person, and that any tribe, national group or country in the world could experience the same moral collapse as Germany experienced, given the right conditions. That was too threatening for many people, because they did not want to acknowledge how deep evil ran in human nature.

And it was, also, the ultimate threat to the neo-cons that were beginning to gain power in the US. If the same moral collapse that happened in Germany could happen elsewhere, such an analysis could be applied anywhere, which meant that the big neo-conservative foundations could not control discourse about the Holocaust. An objective deconstruction of the development of evil in Germany could even serve as a guide to what is happening in Israel. The neo-cons could not allow that to happen, because of their position that Israel’s government could never be criticized; and because the neo-conservatives did not want a truly objective deconstruction of the Holocaust that could teach people how to defeat systemic evil. On the contrary—they sought to create their own systemic evil in the US and in the Middle East, by using the Holocaust to arouse fear, anger, guilt and aggression, as well as religious nationalism generally.

Invoking the Holocaust in social and political discourse became a way for the powerful neo-cons and the Israel Lobby to use the unresolved trauma of the Holocaust, in some cases to generate ideas and in other cases to suppress them. The use of the Holocaust to manipulate people and societies to uncritically support Israel depends on a particularization of the Holocaust—it insists, in other words, that Nazi evil cannot be compared to any other form of systemic evil. It insists that the causes of German moral collapse (violent nationalism, fanatical identification with victim status, deep feelings of inferiority, a longing for apocalyptic solutions) cannot be applied anywhere else. That is despicable nonsense.

Not only can the causes of German moral collapse be seen in other nations and situations; such an analysis must be applied to other nations and situations, if we are to learn anything about how systemic evil works. Neo-cons generally dislike that, because they wish to discuss the Holocaust only within a context of Jewish exceptionalism. But sadly, there’s a Nazi in everybody—in fact, that’s the most important thing that the Holocaust teachers us. As Avraham Burg writes, today’s Israel feels a lot like Weimer, not because Israeli culture is so similar to central Europe’s culture, but because the decline into evil is always similar wherever it occurs. How could Israel not look like Weimer, when so much of what passes for a national consciousness in Israel is simply trauma from the Holocaust, which people do not attempt to deconstruct along universal lines but to which they cling as personal as well as national identities?

It was not until after Simon Wiesenthal died in 2005 that a British historian was able to write frankly about the duplicity in Simon Wiesenthal’s stories. Again I must ask, why did not the people who may have known about Wiesenthal’s casual relationship with the truth speak up about it? Predictably, the Simon Wiesenthal Center of Los Angeles, California, is in no hurry to accept this new historical appraisal of their namesake—their website, in fact, faithfully replicates many of Wiesenthal’s lies and inaccuracies. But that should not surprise us, because the Simon Wiesenthal Center, like Simon Wiesenthal himself, is not interested in historical truth, nor is it committed to teaching about the history of the Holocaust in all its complexity. The Simon Wiesenthal Center is, rather, committed to using the Holocaust to raise money, and using the trauma associated with it to promote the Center’s extremist political perspectives.

Lawrence Swaim is the Executive Director of the Interfaith Freedom Foundation. This article is from his upcoming book Trauma Bond–An Inquiry Into the Nature of Evil,

The new Internet Explorer® 8 - Faster, safer, easier. Optimized for Yahoo! Get it Now for Free!
River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

VIVA PALESTINA~THE BOYS ON PRESSTV


VIA I4P

two videos to share, one more coming we hope.
Well, we're just back from the celebration, I'm sure the weather is great in Gaza as it's snowing and freezing in Ireland! We had to laugh as the first interviews we saw were three of our five guys on PressTV! First the Ambulance arrived driven by Eanna who had a few words as it passed (video below) then JJ gave a nice interview (video below) then Eddie gave a great interview but we dont have it yet cos the fellow that has it still at the pub celebrating LOL, Hope to have that up soon. So Ireland was well represented today!! Thanks to everyone for all your great comments and good wishes for the lads. We had a scary time last night, but today things are as they should be. They are in Gaza and delivering the aid and ambulance now. You've read their words on the blog, now you can hear them, here's the two short videos:

Derry to Gaza Five in ambulance arriving in Gaza. Eanna, man of few words
"Great, Great to be in Gaza"



JJ interviewd by Aljazeera:


River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

Without Egypt there would be no siege and therefore no need for convoys.

Contributed by Lu from Spain


Lucia said...


"...constant remiders to the Arab people that without Egypt there would be no siege in the first place, and therefore no need for convoys."
(My views, exactly! - Never mind that Israel imposed it. IF EGYPT did not reinforce it, there would be no siege)

Comment:
Exactly,
Neopatriots are defending the zionist regime in Cairo, premoting abu alghait zionist propagnda, calling for the return PA to Gaza, the slogans of: Israel is the enemy, stopping Drag and terrorists smugling,

"General" Sami Jamil Jadalla is calling to to put Gaza under an international custody… under the slogan liberating Palestinians from Fath and Hamas. You know that I fought the last 2-3 years defending Hamas, I was against those calling Hamas, after knocking the wall to pic a fight with Egypt. Having lived 4 years in Egypt, I knew how easy it is for the Regime to mobilize the street against Hamas. besides the street was not ripe, And Hamas was not ready. Things changed after the Cast lead operation, and the continued Siege. All the time I was mocking the guy picking a statement, here and there to support his theory of Hamas using resistance to get to negociation Table, and the theory that Cairo negociation would produce a domasticated Hamas.

Back to the Neopatriots, mocking Galloway, calling him to apologize to Pharaoh, accusing him for lack of transpiracy, going beyond soliderity, and using the Palestine Cause to serve his Agenda.

Yes, Galloway has an Agenda, I would say, well co-ordinated with Hamas and Hamas supporter. The Agenda is breaking the siege at the weakest point, and reminding Egyptions, Arabs, and the whole world "that without Egypt there would be no siege in the first place, and therefore no need for convoys."


"Admiral" Galloway did it, and arrived in time with help of Hamas supporters, I could name Turkey and Syria. We know that there is an extra cost of some $300,00 but we don't know who paid that extra cost. The Neopatriots are desperate to know under the slogan of transperacy.
All the time I was saying: Hamas is buying time, and preparing for confrontation with Egypt if necessary. After the Wall of Shame, Hamas has nothing to lose, especially with Hamas 2010=Hizbollah 2006.
UP




Faith and frustration
Posted by Joti Brar on Wednesday, January 6, 2010 Comment on this post
On Christmas Eve, we were just half a day’s journey away from Gaza. Nearly two weeks later, we are still 40km and nobody knows how many hours or days from our destination.

Despite the full glare of middle-eastern press scrutiny, and the diplomatic backing of the current Turkish and former Malaysian prime ministers, Egypt has thrown every possible obstacle in our path.

Clearly, the Egyptian Government and its Western/Zionist allies have no desire to see more convoys coming through, constant remiders to the Arab people that without Egypt there would be no siege in the first place, and therefore no need for convoys.

On Christmas Day, one convoy member, dressed as Santa, appeared on Al Jazeera explaining that Gaza was the only part of the world where he had been unable to deliver presents that morning.

The general feeling was one of optimism, but there was much anger at the continued news blackout in the mainstream British media,and frustration at the closeness of our final destination. While the convoy’s situation and the plight of Gazans under siege has been the lead story on Al Jazeera and many other middle-eastern TV networks throughout this trip, the British corporate media preferred to fill their air time/print space over Christmas with items of such vital import as the potential life expectancy of a fascistic old Pope and the unexpected arrival of snow in winter.

Boxing Day was a day of rest for those not busy in internet cafés, but by 27 December, the anniversary of last year’s war on Gaza, and the date on which the convoy had hoped to arrive in Palestine, the mood had changed.

We marked the anniversary of the start of the war with a three-minute silence at 11.20am, which was broadcast live by Al Jazeera and covered by several other TV networks, including our embedded Turkish, Malaysian and Press TV crews. The names of the 15 martyred medics,deliberately targeted during the Gaza assault as they tried to reach the wounded, were read out in turn, along with the dates of their deaths.

Following this tribute, we left the compound and staged a solidarity protest at a major road junction nearby. Around 20 members of the convoy also started a hunger strike to highlight the plight of those going hungry in Gaza every day, and to protest at Egypt’s refusal to allow the convoy into Gaza via Nuweiba.

After the main solidarity demonstration, a smaller protest took place outside the Egyptian consulate in Aqaba, while on the beach more convoy members took Viva Palestina banners out into the Red Sea and onto the pier.

That evening, candles were lit to commemorate the 1,400 people killed during Israel’s 22-day assault on the Gaza Strip. Having missed the main vigil, a few of us staged another, smaller one down by the beach later on.

The hunger strike was called off the next afternoon following news that an agreement had been reached with Egypt that we would agree to travel via the Mediterranean port of El-Arish instead of the Red Sea port of Nuweiba in return for an undertaking to let all the aid and all convoy members into Gaza once we arrived in Egypt.

So back we drove, all the way through Jordan and into Syria once more, arriving late on the 29th at the Sahara hotel complex in Damascus, while Viva Palestina scoured the Med for a boat or three that would be able to get all the vehicles and all the people across the sea and be suitable for landing in the low-tech, shallow dock at El-Arish.

Two days later, we were on the move once more, heading for Lattakia in Syria, where we were put up in the Palestinian refugee camp while further negotiations were conducted. Not only was it hard to find the right sort of boats, but there were many firms who simply didn’t want to get involved with shipping cargo that might upset Israel and possibly cause them to be attacked. Meanwhile, written confirmation of Egypt’s agreement to let us all in was proving elusive.

Two days later, a Turkish boat had been found that was willing and able to carry all the vehicles to El-Arish, the only snag being that it first needed to make its way from Libya to Lattakia, and that it was a cargo ship, which meant that separate arrangements would have to be made for the drivers. So while we waited for the boat to arrive at the port, the organizers got to work chartering a small plane that could shuttle us all in several trips to El-Arish.

In the end, we waited four days in Lattakia, but the wait was made easier by the spectacular hospitality and generosity of the people, both in the camp and the town. In the camp, Palestinian families were queueing up to take convoy members home for food and showers, offering us beds and generally treating us like long-lost relatives. In the town, Syrian stall-holders and cafe owners went out of their way to be friendly and helpful, making gifts of food, giving discounted rates for hotels and internet and generally proving by the intelligence of their conversation to be a very civilized, well-educated people.

A day and a half after we had loaded our vehicles onto the boat at Lattakia, Viva Palestina finally received written confirmation from the Egyptians that our planes would be allowed to land in El-Arish and that all volunteers would be taken to the port to be reunited with their aid. Of course, it didn’t prove quite that simple. The first plane-load to arrive found themselves issued with emergency exit visas and were told they would be taken straight to Rafah.

A night of negotiation coupled with spirited protest ensued (publicised by Al Jazeera), following which the customs officials backed down, cancelled the exit visas and took the volunteers to a hotel to await the arrival of the rest of the convoy.

Meanwhile, the second plane-load of volunteers was held up by engine trouble, which meant that the plane was diverted to Damascus airport and a replacement had to be found. On arrival at El-Arish, more shenanigans ensued as customs officials, having failed to stop three convoy members they had given advance warning would be refused entry to Egypt, decided to detain three others instead.

A combination of negotiation and protest carried the point in our favour once again, however, no doubt helped by the pressure of the last group of volunteers who were queueing up outside the building to be processed, having just arrived at the airport.

As the sun went down on another unpredictable day yesterday, we were all here in El-Arish port, people and vehicles reunited and aid all intact. After all the delays and extra costs, Gaza is only 40km away, but there were more unpleasant surprises in store for us, when the local authorities walked out of negotiations about which vehicles and aid they wanted to allow into Gaza.


Instead of returning, they sent 2,000 uniformed riot cops and non-uniformed provocateurs to surround the port, blockading us in and then attacking those protesting at the gates with paving slabs and more.
So instead of driving to Gaza, the convoy spent the first half of the night in a pitched battle with Egyptian police, who used pepper spray, water cannon, rocks and metal batons against a couple of hundred of our volunteers. Middle-eastern TV broadcast five hours of live coverage of the battle into homes across the region, exposing still further the criminal role of Egypt in the siege of Gaza.

Fifty-five convoy members were wounded during the fighting, several of whom had to be taken to hospital for treatment, being beyond the scope of the ad hoc first aid station we set up within the port compound. Six brothers of various nationalities were arrested and held all night and most of today in a police van without food, water or toilet facilities.

This morning, Viva Palestina announced that negotiations at the highest level, between the Egyptian and Turkish prime ministers, had failed to persuade the Egyptians to let all our vehicles in, so cars and 4x4s requested by doctors and clinics will not be delivered to Gaza, but will instead be taken by Turkish drivers to refugee camps in Syria and Lebanon.

All the people and aid have been agreed to, however, so now we are just waiting for the army to open the gates and then we will make our way to Rafah and on into Gaza this evening.



River to Sea
Uprooted Palestinian

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Hamas Detainees Ready to Wait for Deal




06/01/2010 Hamas detainees jailed in the Israeli jails are pressuring the movement's leaders not to finalize a prisoner exchange deal which will not include the release of all the detainees demanded by the Palestinian organization.

Ynet has learned that the Hamas detainees' leadership recently conveyed a message to the movement's leaders that they are willing to wait many more months until a deal is implemented, as long as Hamas does not give in to the Israeli veto on some of the detainees on its list.

Sources in Hamas told Ynet on Tuesday evening that the message conveyed by the detainees encouraged the movement's leadership not to give up on its demand that all the detainees required by Hamas would be included in a deal securing the release of captured occupation soldier Gilad Shalit.

"We won't rush and won't give in to any Israeli attempt to avoid the understandings already received, or to the recent Israeli toughening," one of the sources said.

"Our list is known, our demands are familiar and our prisoners and their family members support us. Everyone understands that we want the prisoners released, but they understand very well that without a deal many prisoners will stay behind, and therefore the message is not to give up and not to compromise."

Meanwhile, the Hamas leadership in Gaza has not revealed any details from the discussions held in the past few days, and its conclusions were relayed Tuesday to German mediator Gerhard Konrad. But sources in Hamas have reiterated that it was made clear that the latest Israeli proposal was insufficient.

Nonetheless, Hamas is not slamming the door on the agreement. "The movement is interested in continuing the negotiations," a movement sources said Tuesday morning.

The organization understands that a possible diplomatic move between Israel and the Palestinians, sponsored by Egypt and the United States, may make it difficult to make a breakthrough in the Shalit affair, and that it is quite possible that the efforts will be halted in the near future, as each side is insisting on its demands.

Hamas deputy politburo chief Mousa Abu Marzouk said Tuesday that Israel's latest offer on a deal was a retreat from its prior stance. "This is the Israelis' way, every time we got close to reaching an agreement – they withdrew in the last minute," Abu Marzouk told the London-based Arabic-language al-Hayat newspaper.

The Hamas deputy hinted that a deal was far from being reached: "The German mediator is not the first mediator, and he won't be the last. We are sticking to our demands, and are working to achieve an honorable exchange deal that will free our heroic prisoners, who have paid a heavy price for the homeland. We will not give up on them, and this is the movement's commitment to them."

River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

Photostory: Commemorating the assault on Gaza

The Electronic Intifada
Photostory, The Electronic Intifada, 5 January 2010

Approximately one year ago, Israel unleashed its assault on the Gaza Strip -- amidst its ongoing siege and occupation -- killing more than 1,400 Palestinians, the majority of them civilians. Thirteen Israelis were killed during the attacks, most of them soldiers. Israel has since been accused of war crimes by numerous international human rights organizations as well as in a UN-commissioned inquiry led by South African Judge Richard Goldstone. The attacks sparked mass demonstrations around the world in solidarity with Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. Solidarity actions have continued, and a number of groups have attempted to travel to Gaza and break the siege. The below images are from around the one year anniversary, when many groups around the world again led demonstrations to show their continued solidarity with Palestine. If you have images to which you hold the rights documenting Palestine, Palestinian life, politics and culture, or of solidarity with Palestine, please email images and captions to photos A T electronicintifada D O T net.



San Francisco, 31 December 2009. (Rick Sterling)



Erez Crossing between Israel and Gaza, 31 December 2009. (Oren Ziv/ActiveStills)



Anchorage, Alaska, US, 2 January 2010. (Alaskans For Palestine)



New York City, US, 27 December 2009. (Andy Pollack)



Cairo, Egypt, 29 December 2009. (Dana Elborno)



Belfast, Ireland, 28 December 2009. (Ciaran O Brolchain)



Blue Hill, Maine, US, 30 December 2009. (Gaza Freedom March)



Adelaide, Australia, 31 December 2009. (Gaza Freedom March)



Boston, US, 31 December 2009. (Kade Ellis)



Chicago, US, 30 December 2009. (Maureen Clare Murphy)



Amsterdam, Netherlands, 27 December 2009. (Netherlands Palestine Committee)



Eureka, Canada, 31 December 2009. (Gaza Freedom March)



Philadelphia, US, 30 December 2009. (Pam Hinden)



Bern, Switzerland, 27 December 2009. (Gaza Freedom March)



Seattle, US, 27 December 2009. (Aditya Ganapathiraju)



Ottawa, Canada, 27 December 2009. (Rehab Nazzal)


River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian

Bahar: All conspiracies aimed to blackmail Gaza people will fail


[ 06/01/2010 - 05:00 PM ]

GAZA, (PIC)-- Dr. Ahmed Bahar, the first deputy speaker of the Palestinian legislative council (PLC), stressed Wednesday that all conspiracies that are aimed to undermine the steadfastness of Gaza people and blackmail them into making concessions would fail.

During the opening ceremony of Besan city in northern Gaza Strip, Dr. Bahar said that the blockade, the military aggression and the steel wall being built to starve the Gaza people and kill them would not succeed in forcing them to give up their steadfastness and their rights regardless of the sacrifices.

In a speech, the deputy speaker questioned whether Gaza is really a threat to Egypt’s national security, emphasizing that the real threat to Egypt is Israel which uses Sinai airspace to hit Gaza tunnels.

For his part, Dr. Mohamed Al-Agha, the Palestinian minister of agriculture, affirmed the government’s insistence on making achievements and entrench the Palestinian presence despite the blockade and aggression.

Dr. Agha highlighted some of the major projects which his ministry planned to develop in order to achieve food security including the opening of the largest palm nursery in Palestine in addition to the cultivation of a quarter million seedlings of various nuts such as apricots and almonds.

At the conclusion of the ceremony, Dr. Bahar along with Dr. Agha and interior minister Fathi Hammad cut the ribbon and planted a group of saplings to mark the opening of the city.


River to Sea
 Uprooted Palestinian