Search This Blog

Loading...

Thursday, 23 September 2010

Anti-Semitism versus Anti-Gentile(ism)

21. Sep, 2010
Bishop Donald R. Corder


Over Palestine

The cry of anti-Semitism was first fashioned and employed in 1847 to deflect attention from the emotionally charged hostilities invoked by the mention of a people who were initially identified having a racial designation of Hebrew, Israelites as their national origin and Jewish as the tribal designation. Anti-Semitism as a defensive ploy diverted attention from the negative emotional charge aimed against the individual and re-directed focus to an impersonal intellectual fabrication used to communicate and shape social interactions, behavioral norms and value constructs. Hence, the misleading notion of the term anti-Semitism can more accurately now be understood to represent real world personages who give rise to anti-Jewish feelings. In most cases as political and ethical reaction to Jewish tribal politics, Zionism, Israel, Israeli lobbying, global Zionist affairs, Jewish ideology, Jewish supremacy, Israeli war crimes and so on.” Gilad Atzmon.

Power of the social construct Anti-Semitism is found in the collective consciousness fashioned by theatrical versions of the Holocaust, massive control of social engineering media, UN Resolutions and the laws of European Nations providing social stigma and consequence suffering the full force and weight of the law upon the slightest of suggestion of its real, imagined or fabricated sighting.

Perpetuating in its wake, a hypocrisy ignoring the factual continuity of Zionist political, social and economic involvements where attention can be re-directed to the far more trivial of being politically correct rather than forearmed through knowledge and informed thinking.

Witnessed in the attacks upon and eventual resignation of EU trade chief trade Karel De Gucht after his having referred to the power of the “Jewish lobby” in US policy and the difficulty of having “rational” discussions with Jews on the Middle East. Likewise, the British ambassador to Lebanon, Frances Guy and American journalist Lebanese-born Octavia Nasr, senior editor with CNN television a long-time analyst of the Arab world.  Suffered technological lynchings by the Zionist controlled media and puppet regimes after acknowledging their deep respect for the late Sayyed Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah, the Lebanese Shiite Muslim religious figure, enjoyed throughout Lebanon and the Islamic world. Fadlallah, who elicited enormous respect but also angered many in Israel and the West for supporting military resistance to the Israeli occupation of south Lebanon. After veteran White House journalist Helen Thomas was also forced to resign from her position with Hearst Newspapers, following the wave of criticism faced after having said “Jews should get the hell out of Palestine.” Where anti-Semitism can be reduced and understood as committing the crime in one’s telling of the truth.

Strategic necessity for these high profile martyrdom moves beyond simply keeping the other troops in line. But, in the quest for Zionist World Domination we find David Rockefeller in his address to the Trilateral Commission “… I extend my thanks to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years.”

Moving beyond the practical nuance admonished by Rockefeller and into the mystical mind of the Jewish Talmud, “To communicate anything to a Goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.” Libbre David 37. Designs for Zionist World Domination are framed to support perceptions of Gentile inferiority. (See Protocols). Hence, our studies provide for us license to intrude upon the militaristic mind anticipating the outcomes of Anti-Semitism versus Anti-Gentile(ism) Over Palestine and the world.

Simple name calling, flag burning and Nazi swastikas strategically painted upon Jewish artifacts are monitored worldwide along with over 10,000 websites, Facebook and Twitter entries. As Israeli spokespersons disclose on American television they have compiled within their database demographic profiles of growing anti-Semitic or more accurately anti-Israeli Anglo-American view points not made subservient to the Israeli’s digital reconstruction of real world realities. Nonetheless, we find far weightier matters uncovered when we pause to consider, how will this reconnaissance be employed if we are permitted to explore the notion Gaza is only a spiritual microcosm of the global design inspired by the mystical Father of Modern Zionism; Theodore’s Herzl and his model for The Jewish State.
Herzl’s declaration of financial warfare and the historical position of the Jewish Protocols providing the strategic and tactical necessities for invoking massive economic crisis upon the Gentiles are envisioned with the 2008 global economic banking crisis. After the sudden and unexpected digital tsunami assailing the cash reserves of American banks, causing them to become insolvent. US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson employed threats of martial law and civil unrest amounting to fear-mongering, unjustified, and proven wrong, which nonetheless provided passage of the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP). Whereby, cash infusions amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars were directed to Wall Street’s eight largest banks and bailout of the New York Federal Reserve amounting to trillions in government-backed loans. Thereinafter, the financial meltdown provided opportunity for massive consolidation and centralization of banking power along with a window through which new discretionary capitol was utilized against weaker competitors within the financial market, as they were targeted then absorbed through mergers and acquisitions.

But, also triggered and hidden away in the dark corridors and backrooms, were designs to arrest the freedoms of a democratic Gentile Society. Protests against business, government or runs on the troubled banks anticipated the use of military force in response to bailout legislation and the feigned crisis alluded to by Secretary Paulson. Where we now learn the Army’s New Role as first developed in 1968 as response to the major protests and disturbances of the 1960’s. Evolved into the secret Continuity of Government (COG) planning of former US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, Vice President Dick Cheney and others who upon taking office codified through law the US military’s role was not to protect American Society but was to be lent in controlling with mechanisms of the Patriot Act, domestic operations of the US Northern Command (CINC-USNORTHCOM) for the continental United States and suspension of the constitution under martial law on the assumption of domestic emergency.

“Foundations are in Place for Martial Law in the US” Sydney Morning Herald, by Ritt Goldstein 27 July 2002.

Evolving has been the increased numbers of gated communities and private security mobilizations on behalf of the Zionist Ruling Class and their agents; Homeland Security being publicly attacked for identifying right wing groups and former US military as hostile forces with potential for offering armed resistance to perceived anarchy; and the report of the British Defense Ministry setting forth polarizations and concentration of wealth will create a revolutionary middle class and under classes threats to social order –  creating a unification in accessing knowledge, resources and skills to shape transnational processes more conducive to their personal and national self-interests. “The Political Economy of Dictatorship” by Ronald Wintrobe Cambridge University Press, 2000, p. 130.

From which we deduce the absence of political will to reverse the domestic decay necessitated by dismantling the political alliances with the militaristic state of Israel and uprooting its entire domestic power configuration; undermining efforts to achieve an open democratic society serving the interests of the American people. Faced with the reality that the US government by and large does not support the well being of its own citizenry other options must be considered as we address the liberation of Palestine and relieving the suffering of Gaza. Naively looking to Middle Eastern leadership we who support the Palestinians in America discover the need for a reality check.

Alan Hart publishes, ‘…as things are I think it is unrealistic to expect the governments of the major powers either to use the leverage they have to call and hold the Zionist state to account for its past crimes, or to intervene to prevent the crimes it will commit in a foreseeable future.’ Last year I had a private conversation in London with a major royal from the Arab world. I said to him, “Nothing is going to change in the Arab world until your regimes are more frightened of their own masses than they are of offending Zionism and America”. He replied, “You’re right.” I also said to him, “If the Zionists do resort to a final round of ethnic cleaning to close the Palestine file, Arab leaders, behind closed doors, will give thanks and celebrate.” His reply was the same, “You’re right.” “Does the Palestinian Diaspora Care Enough To Become Engaged?” By Alan Hart

The maintenance of the Jewish people throughout the centuries endures through the same mechanism as the incredible almost superhuman steadfastness of the occupied and oppressed Palestinians constituting a prophetic thorn in the side of a nation who would be king. Therein, providing reason to anticipate why Zionism will never be able to close the re-opened Palestine file in Israel’s quest for regional and global domination over the Gentiles. “We as a people shall get to the promised land,” envisions the will of a body united gathered together around the world in a spirit of support for the victims of the Palestinian Holocaust of Zionism. Let us lift our voices up as one lest they forget.

Just as the Jews developed the term anti-Semitism to ward off the disdain engendered in response to their personal interests and collective agenda. Anti-Gentile(ism) can similarly be employed to identify design elements directed to the degradation of non-Jews. “We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population.” –The Koenig Report. “We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live here as slaves.” –Heilbrun, the Chairman of the committee for the Re-election of General Shlomo Lahat, the mayor of Tel Aviv. Anti-Gentile(ism) can be defined as any acts, caricatures or systemic designs employed to subjugate or dehumanize the freewill of a people in a non-Jewish civil society.

Let the cry of Anti-Gentile(ism) resound when they attempt to silence the truth tellers. Let us cry ‘Anti-Gentile(ism)!’ when the Zionist Ruling Classes seek to undermine our institutions and rights to self-determination. Let us cry ‘Anti-Gentile(ism)!’ as they murder our babies and send our love ones to the fridge using US taxpayer dollars. Let us cry ‘Anti-Gentile(ism)!’ as the Zionist Ruling Class alliances siphon away our national resources and we seek through the vestibules of the US Federal, International Courts and sovereign national forums to liquidate the wealth and shake off the strangleholds of these terrorists and Enemies to the Gentile States.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Intifada Palestine
Bishop Donald R. Corder is the spiritual leader of the Spirit of Life International Believers Fellowship and Senior Pastor for the Pillar of Truth Ministries.

Mr. Corder is a published author, grassroots organizer and community activist, in addition to his work in urban and international development as a business consultant and entrepreneur. 


River to Sea Uprooted Palestinian

No comments: