Posted on
March 28, 2013 by Libya 360°
Haaretz piece reveals Syrian conflict is direct punitive result of Assad defying West, obstructing US-Israeli attack on Iran.
Haaretz has recently
published an exceptionally revealing article, confirming that the Brooking
Institution’s “Which
Path to Persia?” report – a plan for the undermining and destruction of Iran
– had indeed been set in motion, and that the current Syrian conflict is a
direct result of Syria and Iran defying the West and disrupting what was to be a
coup de grâce delivered to Tehran.
The article is titled, “Assad’s
Israeli friend,” appears at first to be a ham-handed attempt to portray
Syrian President Bashar Al Assad as somehow allied with Israel’s Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu. Instead, it actually reveals that Israel had attempted to
execute verbatim, the strategies prescribed in the Brookings Institution’s
“Which Path to Persia?” report, where Israel was to lure Syria away from Iran
ahead of a US-Israeli strike and subsequent war with Tehran.
The Haaretz piece states specifically:
In moving closer to Assad, Netanyahu had a number of motives. First, he wanted to put some space between Syria and Iran, in the hope that Damascus would stand aside in the event of an Israeli strike against Iranian nuclear facilities in Natanz and Fordow.Of course, while Haaretz admits that the so-called “Syrian rebels” are in fact vicious Al Qaeda terrorists with no intention of instituting anything resembling “freedom” or “democracy” in Syria, contrary to the West’s own long-peddled narrative, Israel is in fact one of three primary co-conspirators in raising the terrorist army in the first place.
Second, Israel’s loss of its alliances with Turkey and later with Egypt, compounded by apprehension about a deteriorating security situation in the south, pushed Jerusalem into buying quiet on its northern borders.
The third motive was to weaken Hezbollah, while the fourth was to address concerns that the Syrian rebels were in fact Al-Qaida operatives and that the fall of Assad’s regime would turn Syria into a hostile Islamic state.
In Pulitzer Prize-winning
journalist Seymour Hersh’s 2007 New Yorker article, “The
Redirection: Is the Administration’s new policy benefiting our enemies in the
war on terrorism?” Israel was implicated directly in an insidious conspiracy
to funnel aid and arms to sectarian extremists in a bid to topple Iran and its
regional allies:
In the past year, the Saudis, the Israelis, and the Bush Administration have developed a series of informal understandings about their new strategic direction. At least four main elements were involved, the U.S. government consultant told me. First, Israel would be assured that its security was paramount and that Washington and Saudi Arabia and other Sunni states shared its concern about Iran.The Israeli belief that pressuring Syria would make it more “conciliatory and open to negotiations,” as well as the “motivations” cited by the recent Haaretz piece, are torn straight from Brooking Institution’s 2009 “Which Path to Persia?” report. The report stated specifically:
Second, the Saudis would urge Hamas, the Islamist Palestinian party that has received support from Iran, to curtail its anti-Israeli aggression and to begin serious talks about sharing leadership with Fatah, the more secular Palestinian group. (In February, the Saudis brokered a deal at Mecca between the two factions. However, Israel and the U.S. have expressed dissatisfaction with the terms.)
The third component was that the Bush Administration would work directly with Sunni nations to counteract Shiite ascendance in the region.
Fourth, the Saudi government, with Washington’s approval, would provide funds and logistical aid to weaken the government of President Bashir Assad, of Syria. The Israelis believe that putting such pressure on the Assad government will make it more conciliatory and open to negotiations. Syria is a major conduit of arms to Hezbollah. The Saudi government is also at odds with the Syrians over the assassination of Rafik Hariri, the former Lebanese Prime Minister, in Beirut in 2005, for which it believes the Assad government was responsible. Hariri, a billionaire Sunni, was closely associated with the Saudi regime and with Prince Bandar. (A U.N. inquiry strongly suggested that the Syrians were involved, but offered no direct evidence; there are plans for another investigation, by an international tribunal.)
“…the Israelis may want to hold off [on striking Iran] until they have a peace deal with Syria in hand (assuming that Jerusalem believes that one is within reach), which would help them mitigate blowback from Hizballah and potentially Hamas. Consequently, they might want Washington to push hard in mediating between Jerusalem and Damascus.” -page 109 (.pdf)
Clearly Syria refused the
disingenuous “peace deal” with Israel, unlike its regional neighbors Turkey,
Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar who are now all working in lock step with
US-Israeli interests. While these neighbors were spared the sedition and carnage
visited upon other Arab nations during the US State
Department orchestrated “Arab Spring,” Syria has been hit hardest and
longest. The resilience of Syria may have delayed or even shelved Western
designs aimed at reasserting hegemony across the Middle East, including delaying
indefinitely war with Iran.
Israel’s disingenuous
attempts to reproach Syria are only one of several prescribed strategies
Brookings called for in their 2009 report that have already come to pass.
Another was Brookings’ suggestion to deslist and arm the bizarre terrorist cult,
Mujahedeen e-Khalq (MEK). MEK had been listed as a foreign terrorist
organization by the US State Department for decades, yet it was
still heavily armed, funded, and its operatives even trained on US soil –
this despite the group being listed for kidnapping and slaughtering US officers
and civilian contractors.
In 2012, the US State
Department would finally officially delist MEK, and announce that they would
begin funding and arming them in earnest against Iran. The LA Times would report
in their September 2012 article, “U.S.
to remove Iranian group Mujahedin Khalq from terrorist list,” that:
The small but influential Iranian exile group Mujahedin Khalq will be removed from the U.S. list of foreign terrorist organizations, a U.S. official said Friday, following a high-priced lobbying campaign claiming the controversial group had renounced violence.
The New
Yorker and the Uk’s
Daily Mail would each in turn report that MEK was being armed, trained, and
directed by the West in terrorist activities against Iran, including the
assassination of Iranian scientists.
Image>: MEK is just one of many terrorist organizations, that despite being listed by the US State Department as such, still receives weapons, training, cash, and political support from the US government. This is a pattern seen repeated in Libya and most recently in Syria – each case spun and excused with a myriad of lies wrapped in false, constantly shifting narratives.
The US’ delisting and
arming of MEK proves that the West possesses the political duplicity to
hypocritically arm their own “declared” enemies. This double game of condemning
terrorist organizations while simultaneously arming and directing them against
the West’s enemies goes far in explaining how thousands of tons of weapons NATO
and its regional allies have sent to so-called “moderates” in Syria have
ended up almost exclusively in the hands of Al Qaeda’s Syrian franchise,
al-Nusra , which has emerged as the most heavily armed, well funded, most
organized militant front in the conflict.
The Brookings report is
not just a piece of paper – it is a documented conspiracy, executed in plain
sight by corporate-financier
interests that have transcended at least two US presidencies in their latest
campaign against Iran, Syria, and the wider Middle East. Haaretz may hope that
people quickly read the article and conclude that Israel is somehow backing the
Syrian state, never realizing what is being reported is instead a disingenuous
“peace deal” meant to lure in, then fatally betray Syria just as was done to
Libya.
It is clear that Syria is
being punished, divided, and destroyed for obstructing Western designs against
Iran. It is also clear that those forces fighting inside Syria against the
Syrian people and their government, are aiding and abetting foreign aggression
and what is essentially an attempt by Western interests to recolonize the Arab
World. As mortars fired by NATO’s proxy forces, aimed
at Damascus University, claim another 10-15 innocent lives, the public must
be aware of the
premeditated, punitive nature of the unhinged atrocities now being committed
by these “rebels.”
أكد رئيس الموساد السابق
شبتاي شبيط، أن الولايات المتحدة لم تقدم خدمة لإسرائيل بقدر ما قام به حمد بن
خليفة أل ثاني أمير دولة قطر. ونقلت صحيفة يديعوت أحرونوت الإسرائيلية، عن شبيط،
قوله: "إنه يعتقد أن حمد أمير قطر قدم خدمة عظمى لإسرائيل لم تقدمها الدول التي
دعمت اليهود كبريطانيا والولايات المتحدة على مر السنين". وأعرب رئيس الموساد
السابق عن أسفه من موقف الولايات المتحدة المترنح في الدفاع عن دولة «إسرائيل»
ورفضهم توجيه ضربة عسكرية للعدو الإيراني الذي يهدد ليلاً ونهاراً بازالة
«إسرائيل», بينما أصدقاء المنطقة هم أكثر اخلاص منهم,
ويتضح هذا الأمر جلياً في موقف قطر الأخير من النظام المعادي لإسرائيل في
سوريا .
Uprooted Palestinian
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!
No comments:
Post a Comment